Protocol | Published:

Optical sensors for monitoring dynamic changes of intracellular metabolite levels in mammalian cells

Nature Protocols volume 6, pages 18181833 (2011) | Download Citation


Knowledge of the in vivo levels, distribution and flux of ions and metabolites is crucial to our understanding of physiology in both healthy and diseased states. The quantitative analysis of the dynamics of ions and metabolites with subcellular resolution in vivo poses a major challenge for the analysis of metabolic processes. Genetically encoded Förster resonance energy transfer (FRET) sensors can be used for real-time in vivo detection of metabolites. FRET sensor proteins, for example, for glucose, can be targeted genetically to any cellular compartment, or even to subdomains (e.g., a membrane surface), by adding signal sequences or fusing the sensors to specific proteins. The sensors can be used for analyses in individual mammalian cells in culture, in tissue slices and in intact organisms. Applications include gene discovery, high-throughput drug screens or systematic analysis of regulatory networks affecting uptake, efflux and metabolism. Quantitative analyses obtained with the help of FRET sensors for glucose or other ions and metabolites provide valuable data for modeling of flux. Here we provide a detailed protocol for monitoring glucose levels in the cytosol of mammalian cell cultures through the use of FRET glucose sensors; moreover, the protocol can be used for other ions and metabolites and for analyses in other organisms, as has been successfully demonstrated in bacteria, yeast and even intact plants. The whole procedure typically takes 4 d including seeding and transfection of mammalian cells; the FRET-based analysis of transfected cells takes 5 h.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.


All prices are NET prices.


  1. 1.

    & Functional properties and genomics of glucose transporters. Curr. Genomics 8, 113–128 (2007).

  2. 2.

    et al. Sugar transporters for intercellular exchange and nutrition of pathogens. Nature 468, 527–532 (2010).

  3. 3.

    et al. Metabolic flux analysis of CHO cells in perfusion culture by metabolite balancing and 2D [13C, 1H] COSY NMR spectroscopy. Metab. Eng. 12, 138–149 (2010).

  4. 4.

    , & Metabolic ux analysis in eukaryotes. Curr. Opin. Biotech. 21, 63–69 (2010).

  5. 5.

    , & Evaluation of 13C isotopic tracers for metabolic flux analysis in mammalian cells. J. Biotech. 144, 167–174 (2009).

  6. 6.

    , , & Metabolic flux analysis in mammalian cell culture. Metab. Eng. 12, 161–171 (2010).

  7. 7.

    , & A detailed metabolic flux analysis of an underdetermined network of CHO cells. J. Biotech. 150, 497–508 (2010).

  8. 8.

    et al. Characterization of carrier-mediated efflux in human embryonic kidney 293 cells stably expressing the rat serotonin transporter: a superfusion study. J. Neurochem. 74, 1317–1324 (2000).

  9. 9.

    , & Na+-dependent glucose transporter SGLT1 is localized in the apical plasma membrane upon completion of tight junction formation in MDCK cells. Histochem. Cell Biol. 106, 529–533 (1996).

  10. 10.

    13C metabolic flux analysis. Metab. Eng. 3, 195–206 (2001).

  11. 11.

    & Glucose release from GLUT2-null hepatocytes: characterization of a major and a minor pathway. Am. J. Physiol. Enocriol. Metab. E794–E801 (2002).

  12. 12.

    et al. Conformational changes couple Na+ and glucose transport. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95, 7789–7794 (1998).

  13. 13.

    et al. Measurement of glucose uptake and intracellular calcium concentration in single, living pancreatic beta-cells. J. Biol. Chem. 275, 22278–22283 (2000).

  14. 14.

    , & Quantitative imaging for discovery and assembly of the metabo-regulome. New Phytol. 180, 271–295 (2008).

  15. 15.

    , & Sugar and signal-transducer binding sites of the Escherichia coli galactose chemoreceptor protein. Science 242, 1290–1295 (1988).

  16. 16.

    , & Visualization of maltose uptake in living yeast cells by fluorescent nanosensors. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99, 9846–9851 (2002).

  17. 17.

    , , & Live imaging of glucose homeostasis in nuclei of COS-7 cells. J. Fluoresc. 14, 603–609 (2004).

  18. 18.

    et al. Construction and optimization of a family of genetically encoded metabolite sensors by semirational protein engineering. Protein Sci. 14, 2304–2314 (2005).

  19. 19.

    et al. Hue-shifted monomeric variants of Clavularia cyan fluorescent protein: identification of the molecular determinants of color and applications in fluorescence imaging. BMC Biol. 6, 13 (2008).

  20. 20.

    et al. Rapid metabolism of glucose detected with FRET glucose nanosensors in epidermal cells and intact roots of Arabidopsis RNA-silencing mutants. Plant Cell 18, 2314–2325 (2006).

  21. 21.

    et al. In vivo imaging of the dynamics of glucose uptake in the cytosol of COS-7 cells by fluorescent nanosensors. J. Biol. Chem. 278, 19127–19133 (2003).

  22. 22.

    Principles of Fluorescence Spectroscopy 2nd edn. (Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, 1999).

  23. 23.

    , & GLUT1 and GLUT9 as major contributors to glucose influx in HepG2 cells identified by a high sensitivity intramolecular FRET glucose sensor. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1778, 1091–1099 (2008).

  24. 24.

    et al. Dynamic analysis of cytosolic glucose and ATP levels in yeast using optical sensors. Biochem. J. 432, 399–406 (2010).

  25. 25.

    , , & Evidence for high-capacity bidirectional glucose transport across the endoplasmic reticulum membrane by genetically encoded fluorescence resonance energy transfer nanosensors. Mol. Cell. Biol. 25, 11102–11112 (2005).

  26. 26.

    et al. High resolution measurement of the glycolytic rate. Front. Neuroenerg. 2, pii. 26 (2010).

  27. 27.

    et al. A novel analytical method for in vivo phosphate tracking. FEBS Lett. 580, 5885–5893 (2006).

  28. 28.

    & Facilitative plasma membrane transporters function during ER transit. FASEB J. 24, 2849–2858 (2010).

  29. 29.

    et al. Protonophore- and pH-insensitive glucose and sucrose accumulation detected by FRET nanosensors in Arabidopsis root tips. Plant J. 56, 948–962 (2008).

  30. 30.

    , , , & Optical sensors for measuring dynamic changes of cytosolic metabolite levels in yeast. Nat. Protoc. 6, 1806–1817 (2011).

  31. 31.

    et al. In vivo biochemistry: quantifying ion and metabolite levels in individual cells or cultures of yeast. Biochem. J. 438, 1–10 (2011).

  32. 32.

    , & Plant science—Hexokinase, jack-of-all-trades. Science 300, 261–262 (2003).

  33. 33.

    , , & Minimally invasive dynamic imaging of ions and metabolites in living cells. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 7, 345–351 (2004).

  34. 34.

    et al. Detection of glutamate release from neurons by genetically encoded surface-displayed FRET nanosensors. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102, 8740–8745 (2005).

  35. 35.

    & Intracellular Ca2+ imaging in C. elegans. Methods Mol. Biol. 351, 253–264 (2006).

  36. 36.

    , , & Visualizing voltage dynamics in zebrafish heart. J. Physiol. 588, 2017–2021 (2010).

  37. 37.

    et al. Imaging neural activity in worms, flies and mice with improved GCaMP calcium indicators. Nat. Methods 6, 875–881 (2009).

  38. 38.

    et al. Genetically encoded FRET sensors to monitor intracellular Zn2+ homeostasis. Nat. Methods 6, 737–740 (2009).

  39. 39.

    et al. Dynamic copper(I) imaging in mammalian cells with a genetically encoded fluorescent copper(I) sensor. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 132, 2567–2569 (2010).

  40. 40.

    , , & Development of a fluorescent nanosensor for ribose. FEBS Lett. 553, 85–89 (2003).

  41. 41.

    et al. Fluorescence resonance energy transfer sensors for quantitative monitoring of pentose and disaccharide accumulation in bacteria. Biotechnol. Biofuels 1, 11 (2008).

  42. 42.

    et al. Conversion of a putative Agrobacterium sugar-binding protein into a FRET sensor with high selectivity for sucrose. J. Biol. Chem. 281, 30875–30883 (2006).

  43. 43.

    et al. Nanosensor detection of an immunoregulatory tryptophan influx/kynurenine efflux cycle. PLoS Biol 5, e257 (2007).

  44. 44.

    & FRET or no FRET: a quantitative comparison. Biophys. J. 84, 3992–4010 (2003).

  45. 45.

    , & Fanciful FRET. Science STKE 2006, re2 (2006).

  46. 46.

    et al. Calibration of fluorescence resonance energy transfer in microscopy using genetically engineered GFP derivatives on nickel chelating beads. Biotechnology et alia 3, 1–18 (1997).

  47. 47.

    Facilitated glucose transporters in epithelial cells. Annu. Rev. Physiol. 55, 591–608 (1993).

  48. 48.

    & The fluorescent protein palette: tools for cellular imaging. Chem. Soc. Rev. 38, 2887–2921 (2009).

  49. 49.

    et al. Bright cyan fluorescent protein variants identified by fluorescence lifetime screening. Nat. Methods 7, 137–139 (2010).

Download references


This research was supported by the National Institutes of Health (National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases; 1RO1DK079109). G.G. was supported by the European Molecular Biology Organization. X.-Q.Q. was supported by a stipend from the Scholarship Program of the Chinese Scholarship Council (file no. 2009635108). We thank the members in our lab for the corrections and suggestions in this paper. Special thanks go to K.-J. Huang (Stanford University) for his intensive support in writing and discussion during the preparation of this manuscript.

Author information


  1. Carnegie Institution for Science, Stanford, California, USA.

    • Bi-Huei Hou
    • , Hitomi Takanaga
    • , Guido Grossmann
    • , Li-Qing Chen
    • , Xiao-Qing Qu
    • , Alexander M Jones
    • , Sylvie Lalonde
    •  & Wolf B Frommer
  2. Santen, Inc., Emeryville, California, USA.

    • Hitomi Takanaga
  3. Key Laboratory of Plant and Soil Interactions, College of Resources and Environmental Sciences, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China.

    • Xiao-Qing Qu
  4. Institute of Bio- and Geo-Sciences, IBG-1: Biotechnology, Forschungszentrum Jülich, Jülich, Germany.

    • Oliver Schweissgut
    •  & Wolfgang Wiechert


  1. Search for Bi-Huei Hou in:

  2. Search for Hitomi Takanaga in:

  3. Search for Guido Grossmann in:

  4. Search for Li-Qing Chen in:

  5. Search for Xiao-Qing Qu in:

  6. Search for Alexander M Jones in:

  7. Search for Sylvie Lalonde in:

  8. Search for Oliver Schweissgut in:

  9. Search for Wolfgang Wiechert in:

  10. Search for Wolf B Frommer in:


B.-H.H. and H.T. conducted experiments and data analysis. H.T. had a major role in the development of this FRET imaging technology. L.-Q.C., G.G., X.-Q.Q., A.M.J. and S.L. assisted in the preparation of the paper and figures. O.S. and W.W. wrote the FRET script for MATLAB. B.-H.H. and W.B.F. wrote the paper.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wolf B Frommer.

Supplementary information

Text files

  1. 1.

    Supplementary Data 1

    Example of data (.txt) exported from the software SlideBook.

Zip files

  1. 1.

    Supplementary Data 2

    The script (FRETnorm) for FRET imaging in Matlab.

PDF files

  1. 1.

    Supplementary Data 3

    The manual of the Matlab script, FRETnorm.

CSV files

  1. 1.

    Supplementary Data 4

    Example of the loading instruction (external-load.csv). The column provides the glucose concentrations at a given time (corresponding to time points in the input data file, cf Supplemental Data 5) for a defined perfusion experiment, e.g. as shown in Figure 8.

  2. 2.

    Supplementary Data 5

    Example of an input data file (.csv) recognized by FRETnorm. This file provides the time, the background and the actual fluorescence data for each ROI. It is generated from the Supplementary file 1 (.txt). The data in this file were further analyzed by Matlab and plotted in Figure 8b.

About this article

Publication history



Further reading


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.