Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Protocol
  • Published:

Cell separation using cryogel-based affinity chromatography

Subjects

Abstract

In cell affinity chromatography, type-specific cell separation is based on the interaction between cell-surface receptors and an immobilized ligand on a stationary matrix. This protocol describes the preparation of monolithic polyacrylamide and polydimethylacrylamide cryogel affinity matrices that can be used as a generic type-specific cell separation approach. The supermacroporous monolithic cryogel has highly interconnected large pores (up to 100 μm) for convective migration of large particles such as mammalian cells. In this protocol, they are functionalized to immobilize a protein A ligand by a two-step derivatization of epoxy-containing cryogel monolith (reaction with ethylenediamine and glutaraldehyde). Target cells were labeled with specific antibodies and then they were captured in the cryogel through affinity with protein A. These specifically captured cells were recovered in high yields while retaining their viability by mechanical squeezing of the spongy and elastic cryogel matrices. The suggested cell separation protocol takes <30 min for complete separation on a preprepared protein A–immobilized cryogel column.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Cryogelation process: polymer or monomer is mixed in aqueous solvent and then the whole system is incubated at subzero temperature for cryopolymerization and/or gelation, along with ice crystal formation (ice crystals function as a porogen).
Figure 2
Figure 3: The cell separation strategy used for stem cell separation from umbilical cord blood.
Figure 4: Mechanical squeezing of the cryogel matrix for the recovery of bound cells.
Figure 5: Physical characteristics of the monolithic cryogel chromatography column.
Figure 6: Scanning electron micrograph of the inner part of the supermacroporous cryogel-protein A matrix loaded with lymphocytes.
Figure 7: The cell separation efficiency on an affinity-based cryogel chromatographic column (per milliliter adsorbent).

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kumar, A., Galaev, I.Y. & Mattiasson, B. Cell Separation: Fundamentals, Analytical and Preparative Methods (Springer-Verlag Berlin, Heidelberg, 2007).

  2. Shortman, K. Physical procedures for the separation of animal cells. Annu. Rev. Biophys. Bioeng. 1, 93–130 (1972).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Kumar, R.K. & Lykke, A.W.J. Cell separation: a review. Pathology 16, 53–92 (1984).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. de Wildt, R.M., van den Hoogen, F.H., van Venrooij, W.J. & Hoet, R.M. Isolation and characterization of single anti-U1A-specific B cells from autoimmune patients. Ann. NY Acad. Sci. 815, 440–442 (1997).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Edelman, G.M., Rutishauser, U. & Millette, C.F. Cell fractionation and arrangement on fibers, beads, and surfaces. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 68, 2153–2157 (1971).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Givan, A.L. Flow cytometry: an introduction. Methods Mol. Biol. 263, 1–32 (2004).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Herzenberg, L.A., Parks, D., Sahaf, B., Perez, O. & Roederer, M. The history and future of the fluorescence activated cell sorter and flow cytometry: a view from Stanford. Clin. Chem. 48, 1819–1827 (2002).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Hoffman, R.A. & Houck, D.W. Cell separation using flow cytometric cell sorting. In Cell Separation Methods and Applications Vol. 106 (eds. Recktenwald, D. & Radbruch, A.) 237 (Marcel Dekker, New York, 1997).

  9. Bjerke, T., Nielsen, S., Helgestad, J., Nielsen, B.W. & Schiotz, P.O. Purification of human blood basophils by negative selection using immunomagnetic beads. J. Immunol. Methods 157, 49–56 (1993).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Bonanno, G. et al. Clinical isolation and functional characterization of cord blood CD133+ hematopoietic progenitor cells. Transfusion 44, 1087–1097 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Sonti, S.V. et al. Large scale isolation of expression vector cassette by magnetic triple helix affinity capture. Nucleic Acids Res. 23, 3995–3996 (1995).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Albertson, P.A. Partition of Cell Particles and Macromolecules (Wiley, 1986).

  13. Kumar, A., Kamihira, M., Galaev, I.Y., Mattiasson, B. & Iijima, S. Type-specific separation of animal cells in aqueous two-phase systems using antibody conjugates with temperature-sensitive polymers. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 75, 570–580 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Clemmitt, R.H. & Chase, H.A. Impact of operating variables on the expanded bed adsorption of Saccharomyces cerevisiae cells using a concanavalin A derivatized perfluorocarbon. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 82, 506–516 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Ujam, L.B. et al. Isolation of monocytes from human peripheral blood using immuno-affinity expanded-bed adsorption. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 83, 554–566 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Ghetie, V., Mota, G. & Sjoquist, J. Separation of cells by affinity chromatography on SpA-Sepharose 6mb. J. Immunol. Methods 21, 133–141 (1978).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Feucht, H.E., Hadam, M.R., Frank, F. & Riethmuller, G. Efficient separation of human lymphocytes-T from venous-blood using PVP-coated colloidal silica particles (Percoll). J. Immunol. Methods 38, 43–51 (1980).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Lozinsky, V.I., Plieva, F.M., Galaev, I.Y. & Mattiasson, B. The potential of polymeric cryogels in bioseparation. Bioseparation 10, 163–188 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Lozinsky, V.I. et al. Polymeric cryogels as promising materials of biotechnological interest. Trends Biotechnol. 21, 445–451 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Kumar, A., Plieva, F.M., Galaev, I.Y. & Mattiasson, B. Affinity fractionation of lymphocytes using a monolithic cryogel. J. Immunol. Methods 283, 185–194 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Dainiak, M.B., Galaev, I.Y. & Mattiasson, B. Macroporous monolithic hydrogels in a 96-minicolumn plate format for cell surface-analysis and integrated binding/quantification of cells. Enzyme Microb. Technol. 40, 688–695 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Arvidsson, P. et al. Chromatography of microbial cells using continuous supermacroporous affinity and ion-exchange columns. J. Chromatogr. A 977, 27–38 (2002).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Dainiak, M.B., Plieva, F.M., Galaev, I.Y., Hatti-Kaul, R. & Mattiasson, B. Cell chromatography: separation of different microbial cells using IMAC supermacroporous monolithic columns. Biotechnol. Prog. 21, 644–649 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Dainiak, M.B., Galaev, I.Y. & Mattiasson, B. Affinity cryogel monoliths for screening for optimal separation conditions and chromatographic separation of cells. J. Chromatogr. A 1123, 145–150 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Ahlqvist, J. et al. Affinity binding of inclusion bodies on supermacroporous monolithic cryogels using labeling with specific antibodies. J. Biotechnol. 122, 216–225 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Teilum, A. et al. Binding mitochondria to cryogel monoliths allows detection of proteins specifically released following permeability transition. Anal. Biochem. 348, 209–221 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Williams, S.L., Eccleston, M.E. & Slater, N.K.H. Affinity capture of a biotinylated retrovirus on macroporous monolithic adsorbents: towards a rapid single-step purification process. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 89, 783–787 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Kumar, A. et al. Affinity binding of cells to cryogel adsorbents with immobilized specific ligands: effect of ligand coupling and matrix architecture. J. Mol. Recognit. 18, 84–93 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. GE Life Sciences. Ficoll-Paque Plus intended use: for in vitro isolation of lymphocytes. Instructions 71-7167-00 AG (2007).

Download references

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge the financial support from the Department of Biotechnology (DBT) and the Department of Science and Technology (DST), Ministry of Science and Technology, Government of India.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

The protocol was jointly conceived and written by both the authors.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ashok Kumar.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kumar, A., Srivastava, A. Cell separation using cryogel-based affinity chromatography. Nat Protoc 5, 1737–1747 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2010.135

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2010.135

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing