This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$209.00 per year
only $17.42 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
References
Connor S and Garden OJ (2006) Bile duct injury in the era of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg 93: 158–168
Schmitz R et al. (1997) Randomized clinical trial of conventional cholecystectomy versus minicholecystectomy. Br J Surg 84: 1683–1686
Assalia A et al. (1993) Minicholecystectomy vs conventional cholecystectomy: a prospective randomized trial–implications in the laparoscopic era. World J Surg 17: 755–759
McGinn FP et al. (1995) Randomized trial of laparoscopic cholecystectomy and mini-cholecystectomy. Br J Surg 82: 1374–1377
Majeed AW et al. (1996) Randomised, prospective, single-blind comparison of laparoscopic versus small-incision cholecystectomy. Lancet 347: 989–994
Acknowledgements
The synopsis was written by Rachel Jones, Associate Editor, Nature Clinical Practice.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The author declares no competing financial interests.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kendrick, M. Minilaparotomy cholecystectomy or laparoscopic cholecystectomy for symptomatic gallstones?. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 3, 662–663 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1038/ncpgasthep0660
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ncpgasthep0660