Letter | Published:

Targeting neuronal activity-regulated neuroligin-3 dependency in high-grade glioma

Nature volume 549, pages 533537 (28 September 2017) | Download Citation

Abstract

High-grade gliomas (HGG) are a devastating group of cancers, and represent the leading cause of brain tumour-related death in both children and adults. Therapies aimed at mechanisms intrinsic to glioma cells have translated to only limited success; effective therapeutic strategies will need also to target elements of the tumour microenvironment that promote glioma progression. Neuronal activity promotes the growth of a range of molecularly and clinically distinct HGG types, including adult and paediatric glioblastoma (GBM), anaplastic oligodendroglioma, and diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma (DIPG)1. An important mechanism that mediates this neural regulation of brain cancer is activity-dependent cleavage and secretion of the synaptic adhesion molecule neuroligin-3 (NLGN3), which promotes glioma proliferation through the PI3K–mTOR pathway1. However, the necessity of NLGN3 for glioma growth, the proteolytic mechanism of NLGN3 secretion, and the further molecular consequences of NLGN3 secretion in glioma cells remain unknown. Here we show that HGG growth depends on microenvironmental NLGN3, identify signalling cascades downstream of NLGN3 binding in glioma, and determine a therapeutically targetable mechanism of secretion. Patient-derived orthotopic xenografts of paediatric GBM, DIPG and adult GBM fail to grow in Nlgn3 knockout mice. NLGN3 stimulates several oncogenic pathways, such as early focal adhesion kinase activation upstream of PI3K–mTOR, and induces transcriptional changes that include upregulation of several synapse-related genes in glioma cells. NLGN3 is cleaved from both neurons and oligodendrocyte precursor cells via the ADAM10 sheddase. ADAM10 inhibitors prevent the release of NLGN3 into the tumour microenvironment and robustly block HGG xenograft growth. This work defines a promising strategy for targeting NLGN3 secretion, which could prove transformative for HGG therapy.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

Accessions

Primary accessions

Gene Expression Omnibus

References

  1. 1.

    et al. Neuronal activity promotes glioma growth through neuroligin-3 secretion. Cell 161, 803–816 (2015)

  2. 2.

    et al. Neuroligins determine synapse maturation and function. Neuron 51, 741–754 (2006)

  3. 3.

    et al. Neuroligin-3-deficient mice: model of a monogenic heritable form of autism with an olfactory deficit. Genes Brain Behav. 8, 416–425 (2009)

  4. 4.

    et al. A neuroligin-3 mutation implicated in autism increases inhibitory synaptic transmission in mice. Science 318, 71–76 (2007)

  5. 5.

    et al. Autism-linked neuroligin-3 R451C mutation differentially alters hippocampal and cortical synaptic function. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 13764–13769 (2011)

  6. 6.

    et al. Neuroligin-1 deletion results in impaired spatial memory and increased repetitive behavior. J. Neurosci. 30, 2115–2129 (2010)

  7. 7.

    et al. Combination inhibition of PI3K and mTORC1 yields durable remissions in mice bearing orthotopic patient-derived xenografts of HER2-positive breast cancer brain metastases. Nat. Med. 22, 723–726 (2016)

  8. 8.

    et al. Most human non-GCIMP glioblastoma subtypes evolve from a common proneural-like precursor glioma. Cancer Cell 26, 288–300 (2014)

  9. 9.

    et al. Expression, mutation and copy number analysis of platelet-derived growth factor receptor A (PDGFRA) and its ligand PDGFA in gliomas. Br. J. Cancer 101, 973–982 (2009)

  10. 10.

    et al. A positive feed-forward loop associating EGR1 and PDGFA promotes proliferation and self-renewal in glioblastoma stem cells. J. Biol. Chem. 291, 10684–10699 (2016)

  11. 11.

    et al. Tweety-homolog 1 drives brain colonization of gliomas. J. Neurosci. 37, 6837–6850 (2017)

  12. 12.

    et al. Transcriptional dependencies in diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma. Cancer Cell 31, 635–652.e6 (2017)

  13. 13.

    et al. An RNA-sequencing transcriptome and splicing database of glia, neurons, and vascular cells of the cerebral cortex. J. Neurosci. 34, 11929–11947 (2014)

  14. 14.

    , , & Glutamatergic synapses on oligodendrocyte precursor cells in the hippocampus. Nature 405, 187–191 (2000)

  15. 15.

    & Synaptic signaling between GABAergic interneurons and oligodendrocyte precursor cells in the hippocampus. Nat. Neurosci. 7, 24–32 (2004)

  16. 16.

    , , , & Vesicular release of glutamate from unmyelinated axons in white matter. Nat. Neurosci. 10, 321–330 (2007)

  17. 17.

    et al. Activity-dependent proteolytic cleavage of neuroligin-1. Neuron 76, 410–422 (2012)

  18. 18.

    et al. Transsynaptic signaling by activity-dependent cleavage of neuroligin-1. Neuron 76, 396–409 (2012)

  19. 19.

    et al. Systematic substrate identification indicates a central role for the metalloprotease ADAM10 in axon targeting and synapse function. eLife 5, 1174–1189 (2016)

  20. 20.

    et al. ADAM10 and BACE1 are localized to synaptic vesicles. J. Neurochem. 135, 606–615 (2015)

  21. 21.

    , , , & Expression of a-disintegrin and metalloproteinase 10 correlates with grade of malignancy in human glioma. Oncol. Lett. 9, 2157–2162 (2015)

  22. 22.

    et al. A-Disintegrin and Metalloprotease (ADAM) 10 and 17 promote self-renewal of brain tumor sphere forming cells. Cancer Lett. 326, 79–87 (2012)

  23. 23.

    et al. Metalloproteinases ADAM10 and ADAM17 mediate migration and differentiation in glioblastoma sphere-forming cells. Mol. Neurobiol. 54, 3893–3905 (2016)

  24. 24.

    , , & ADAM-10-mediated N-cadherin cleavage is protein kinase C-alpha dependent and promotes glioblastoma cell migration. J. Neurosci. 29, 4605–4615 (2009)

  25. 25.

    , , L. N. et al. A multicenter phase Ib study of the safety, pharmacokinetics, biological activity and clinical efficacy of INCB7839, a potent and selective inhibitor of ADAM10 and ADAM17. Breast Cancer Res. Treat. 106 (Suppl.), S269 (2007)

  26. 26.

    et al. Clinical benefit of INCB7839, a potent and selective inhibitor of ADAM10 and ADAM17, in combination with trastuzumab in metastatic HER2 positive breast cancer patients. Cancer Res. 69, 5056 (2014)

  27. 27.

    et al. A disintegrin-metalloproteinase prevents amyloid plaque formation and hippocampal defects in an Alzheimer disease mouse model. J. Clin. Invest. 113, 1456–1464 (2004)

  28. 28.

    & ELDA: extreme limiting dilution analysis for comparing depleted and enriched populations in stem cell and other assays. J. Immunol. Methods 347, 70–78 (2009)

  29. 29.

    et al. Immunoaffinity profiling of tyrosine phosphorylation in cancer cells. Nat. Biotechnol. 23, 94–101 (2005)

  30. 30.

    et al. Complementary PTM profiling of drug response in human gastric carcinoma by immunoaffinity and IMAC methods with total proteome analysis. Proteomes 3, 160–183 (2015)

  31. 31.

    et al. PTMScan direct: identification and quantification of peptides from critical signaling proteins by immunoaffinity enrichment coupled with LC–MS/MS. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 11, 187–201 (2012)

  32. 32.

    et al. Parts per million mass accuracy on an Orbitrap mass spectrometer via lock mass injection into a C-trap. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 4, 2010–2021 (2005)

  33. 33.

    , & An approach to correlate tandem mass spectral data of peptides with amino acid sequences in a protein database. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 5, 976–989 (1994)

  34. 34.

    et al. A tissue-specific atlas of mouse protein phosphorylation and expression. Cell 143, 1174–1189 (2010)

  35. 35.

    , , & Large-scale phosphorylation analysis of mouse liver. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 104, 1488–1493 (2007)

  36. 36.

    et al. TopHat2: accurate alignment of transcriptomes in the presence of insertions, deletions and gene fusions. Genome Biol. 14, R36 (2013)

  37. 37.

    , & featureCounts: an efficient general purpose program for assigning sequence reads to genomic features. Bioinformatics 30, 923–930 (2014)

  38. 38.

    , & Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biol. 15, 550 (2014)

  39. 39.

    , & Systematic and integrative analysis of large gene lists using DAVID bioinformatics resources. Nat. Protocols 4, 44–57 (2009)

  40. 40.

    , & Bioinformatics enrichment tools: paths toward the comprehensive functional analysis of large gene lists. Nucleic Acids Res. 37, 1–13 (2009)

  41. 41.

    & The Mouse Brain in Stereotaxic Coordinates 3rd edn (Academic, 2008)

  42. 42.

    et al. Functionally defined therapeutic targets in diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma. Nat. Med. 21, 827 (2015)

  43. 43.

    et al. Integrated genomic analysis identifies clinically relevant subtypes of glioblastoma characterized by abnormalities in PDGFRA, IDH1, EGFR, and NF1. Cancer Cell 17, 98–110 (2010)

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge support from the V Foundation, Liwei Wang Research Fund, National Institutes of Health (NINDS R01NS092597; NCI 1F31CA200273, P50 CA168504, P50 CA165962, R35 CA210057), Department of Defense (W81XWH-151-0131), McKenna Claire Foundation, Alex’s Lemonade Stand Foundation, The Cure Starts Now Foundation and DIPG Collaborative, Lyla Nsouli Foundation, Unravel Pediatric Cancer, California Institute for Regenerative Medicine (RN3-06510), Childhood Brain Tumor Foundation, Matthew Larson Foundation, the Joey Fabus Childhood Cancer Foundation, the Wayland Villars DIPG Foundation, the Connor Johnson, Zoey Ganesh, and Declan Gloster Memorial Funds, N8 Foundation, Virginia and D.K. Ludwig Fund for Cancer Research, Child Health Research Institute at Stanford Anne T. and Robert M. Bass Endowed Faculty Scholarship in Pediatric Cancer and Blood Diseases, and Breast Cancer Research Foundation and the intramural programs of the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences and the National Cancer Institute.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Department of Neurology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA

    • Humsa S. Venkatesh
    • , Lydia T. Tam
    • , Pamelyn J. Woo
    • , James Lennon
    • , Surya Nagaraja
    • , Shawn M. Gillespie
    •  & Michelle Monje
  2. Cancer Biology Graduate Program, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA

    • Humsa S. Venkatesh
    •  & Shawn M. Gillespie
  3. Department of Cancer Biology, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA

    • Jing Ni
    •  & Jean J. Zhao
  4. Department of Biological Chemistry and Molecular Pharmacology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA

    • Jing Ni
    •  & Jean J. Zhao
  5. Division of Preclinical Innovation, National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA

    • Damien Y. Duveau
    • , Patrick J. Morris
    •  & Craig J. Thomas
  6. Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA

    • Michelle Monje
  7. Department of Pathology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA

    • Michelle Monje
  8. Institute for Stem Cell Biology and Regenerative Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA

    • Michelle Monje

Authors

  1. Search for Humsa S. Venkatesh in:

  2. Search for Lydia T. Tam in:

  3. Search for Pamelyn J. Woo in:

  4. Search for James Lennon in:

  5. Search for Surya Nagaraja in:

  6. Search for Shawn M. Gillespie in:

  7. Search for Jing Ni in:

  8. Search for Damien Y. Duveau in:

  9. Search for Patrick J. Morris in:

  10. Search for Jean J. Zhao in:

  11. Search for Craig J. Thomas in:

  12. Search for Michelle Monje in:

Contributions

H.S.V., L.T.T., P.J.W., S.M.G., J.L., D.Y.D. and P.J.M. conducted experiments. H.S.V. and M.M. designed the experiments. H.S.V., S.N., S.M.G., J.L., C.J.T. and M.M. analysed the data. J.N. and J.J.Z. developed the breast cancer brain metastasis xenograft model. All authors contributed to manuscript editing. H.S.V. and M.M. wrote the manuscript. M.M. supervised all aspects of the work.

Competing interests

M.M. and H.S.V. declare that Stanford University filed a patent application (15/011260) related to this work.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michelle Monje.

Reviewer Information Nature thanks G. Murphy, M. Taylor and the other anonymous reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Extended data

Supplementary information

PDF files

  1. 1.

    Supplementary Information

    This file contains the uncropped western blots and a Supplementary Discussion.

  2. 2.

    Reporting Summary

Excel files

  1. 1.

    Supplementary Data

    This file contains phosphoproteomic source data relating to Figure 2 and Extended Data Figure 3.

About this article

Publication history

Received

Accepted

Published

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/nature24014

Further reading

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.