Letter | Published:

Meis1 regulates postnatal cardiomyocyte cell cycle arrest

Nature volume 497, pages 249253 (09 May 2013) | Download Citation

Abstract

The neonatal mammalian heart is capable of substantial regeneration following injury through cardiomyocyte proliferation1,2. However, this regenerative capacity is lost by postnatal day 7 and the mechanisms of cardiomyocyte cell cycle arrest remain unclear. The homeodomain transcription factor Meis1 is required for normal cardiac development but its role in cardiomyocytes is unknown3,4. Here we identify Meis1 as a critical regulator of the cardiomyocyte cell cycle. Meis1 deletion in mouse cardiomyocytes was sufficient for extension of the postnatal proliferative window of cardiomyocytes, and for re-activation of cardiomyocyte mitosis in the adult heart with no deleterious effect on cardiac function. In contrast, overexpression of Meis1 in cardiomyocytes decreased neonatal myocyte proliferation and inhibited neonatal heart regeneration. Finally, we show that Meis1 is required for transcriptional activation of the synergistic CDK inhibitors p15, p16 and p21. These results identify Meis1 as a critical transcriptional regulator of cardiomyocyte proliferation and a potential therapeutic target for heart regeneration.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

References

  1. 1.

    et al. Transient regenerative potential of the neonatal mouse heart. Science 331, 1078–1080 (2011)

  2. 2.

    et al. Regulation of neonatal and adult mammalian heart regeneration by the miR-15 family. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 187–192 (2013)

  3. 3.

    et al. A temporal chromatin signature in human embryonic stem cells identifies regulators of cardiac development. Cell 151, 221–232 (2012)

  4. 4.

    et al. Dynamic and coordinated epigenetic regulation of developmental transitions in the cardiac lineage. Cell 151, 206–220 (2012)

  5. 5.

    et al. Evidence for cardiomyocyte renewal in humans. Science 324, 98–102 (2009)

  6. 6.

    et al. Evidence from a genetic fate-mapping study that stem cells refresh adult mammalian cardiomyocytes after injury. Nature Med. 13, 970–974 (2007)

  7. 7.

    et al. Hippo pathway inhibits Wnt signaling to restrain cardiomyocyte proliferation and heart size. Science 332, 458–461 (2011)

  8. 8.

    et al. Primary contribution to zebrafish heart regeneration by gata4+ cardiomyocytes. Nature 464, 601–605 (2010)

  9. 9.

    et al. Zebrafish heart regeneration occurs by cardiomyocyte dedifferentiation and proliferation. Nature 464, 606–609 (2010)

  10. 10.

    , , & The homeodomain protein Meis1 is essential for definitive hematopoiesis and vascular patterning in the mouse embryo. Dev Biol 280, 307–320 (2005)

  11. 11.

    et al. Hematopoietic, angiogenic and eye defects in Meis1 mutant animals. EMBO J. 23, 450–459 (2004)

  12. 12.

    et al. Frequent co-expression of HoxA9 and Meis1 genes in infant acute lymphoblastic leukaemia with MLL rearrangement. Br. J. Haematol. 119, 119–121 (2002)

  13. 13.

    et al. Meis1 regulates the metabolic phenotype and oxidant defense of hematopoietic stem cells. Blood 120, 4963–4972 (2012)

  14. 14.

    et al. AbdB-like Hox proteins stabilize DNA binding by the Meis1 homeodomain proteins. Mol. Cell. Biol. 17, 6448–6458 (1997)

  15. 15.

    , , & Neuregulin1/ErbB4 signaling induces cardiomyocyte proliferation and repair of heart injury. Cell 138, 257–270 (2009)

  16. 16.

    , , , & Targeted expression of cyclin D2 results in cardiomyocyte DNA synthesis and infarct regression in transgenic mice. Circ. Res. 96, 110–118 (2005)

  17. 17.

    et al. Akt promotes increased cardiomyocyte cycling and expansion of the cardiac progenitor cell population. Circ. Res. 99, 381–388 (2006)

  18. 18.

    et al. Rb and p130 control cell cycle gene silencing to maintain the postmitotic phenotype in cardiac myocytes. J. Cell Biol. 194, 407–423 (2011)

  19. 19.

    & Cardiomyocyte cell cycle regulation. Circ. Res. 90, 1044–1054 (2002)

  20. 20.

    , , & Cardiomyocyte cell cycle control and growth estimation in vivo–an analysis based on cardiomyocyte nuclei. Cardiovasc. Res. 86, 365–373 (2010)

  21. 21.

    , & Cell cycle profiles and expressions of p21CIP1 AND P27KIP1 during myocyte development. Int. J. Cardiol. 67, 133–142 (1998)

  22. 22.

    et al. Overlapping roles of pocket proteins in the myocardium are unmasked by germ line deletion of p130 plus heart-specific deletion of Rb. Mol. Cell. Biol. 25, 2486–2497 (2005)

  23. 23.

    et al. The distinct metabolic profile of hematopoietic stem cells reflects their location in a hypoxic niche. Cell Stem Cell 7, 380–390 (2010)

  24. 24.

    et al. De novo cardiomyocytes from within the activated adult heart after injury. Nature 474, 640–644 (2011)

  25. 25.

    et al. Evidence that human cardiac myocytes divide after myocardial infarction. N. Engl. J. Med. 344, 1750–1757 (2001)

  26. 26.

    et al. Cardiomyocyte proliferation contributes to heart growth in young humans. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 1446–1451 (2013)

  27. 27.

    et al. Mammalian heart renewal by pre-existing cardiomyocytes. Nature 493, 433–436 (2013)

  28. 28.

    et al. Functional screening identifies miRNAs inducing cardiac regeneration. Nature 492, 376–381 (2012)

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank J. Shelton for help with histology, J. Cabrera for help with figures, N. Copeland and N. Jenkins for providing the Meis1 KO mice, S. Das for statistics consultation, K. Luby-Phelps for help with microscopy, A. Bugde for confocal assistance, D. Farrar for discussions, H. Nguyen for help with echocardiography, as well as K. Sheth, A. Mercadel and Z. Sadek for technical assistance. This work is supported by grants from the American Heart Association (Grant in Aid) (H.A.S.), the Gilead Research Scholars Program in Cardiovascular Disease (H.A.S.), the Foundation for Heart Failure Research, NY, and the National Institutes of Health (1R01HL115275-01) (H.A.S.).

Author information

Author notes

    • Ahmed I. Mahmoud
    • , Fatih Kocabas
    •  & Shalini A. Muralidhar

    These authors contributed equally to this work.

Affiliations

  1. Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Cardiology, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas 75390, USA

    • Ahmed I. Mahmoud
    • , Fatih Kocabas
    • , Shalini A. Muralidhar
    • , Wataru Kimura
    • , Suwannee Thet
    •  & Hesham A. Sadek
  2. School of Medicine, Ain Shams University, Cairo, 1156, Egypt

    • Ahmed S. Koura
  3. School of Biomedical Sciences, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland 4072, Australia

    • Enzo R. Porrello

Authors

  1. Search for Ahmed I. Mahmoud in:

  2. Search for Fatih Kocabas in:

  3. Search for Shalini A. Muralidhar in:

  4. Search for Wataru Kimura in:

  5. Search for Ahmed S. Koura in:

  6. Search for Suwannee Thet in:

  7. Search for Enzo R. Porrello in:

  8. Search for Hesham A. Sadek in:

Contributions

A.I.M, F.K., S.A.M., E.R.P. and H.A.S. designed the experiments. A.I.M., F.K., S.A.M., W.K. and S.T. performed the experiments. A.I.M., F.K., S.A.M., A.S.K., E.R.P. and H.A.S. analysed the data. A.I.M., F.K., S.A.M. and H.A.S. made the figures. A.I.M. and H.A.S. wrote the manuscript. All authors approved the manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hesham A. Sadek.

Supplementary information

PDF files

  1. 1.

    Supplementary Information

    This file contains Supplementary Methods, Supplementary References and Supplementary Figures 1-5.

About this article

Publication history

Received

Accepted

Published

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/nature12054

Further reading

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.