Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Ecosystem energetic implications of parasite and free-living biomass in three estuaries


Parasites can have strong impacts but are thought to contribute little biomass to ecosystems1,2,3. We quantified the biomass of free-living and parasitic species in three estuaries on the Pacific coast of California and Baja California. Here we show that parasites have substantial biomass in these ecosystems. We found that parasite biomass exceeded that of top predators. The biomass of trematodes was particularly high, being comparable to that of the abundant birds, fishes, burrowing shrimps and polychaetes. Trophically transmitted parasites and parasitic castrators subsumed more biomass than did other parasitic functional groups. The extended phenotype biomass controlled by parasitic castrators sometimes exceeded that of their uninfected hosts. The annual production of free-swimming trematode transmission stages was greater than the combined biomass of all quantified parasites and was also greater than bird biomass. This biomass and productivity of parasites implies a profound role for infectious processes in these estuaries.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Relevant articles

Open Access articles citing this article.

Access options

Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.


All prices are NET prices.

Figure 1: Biomass of animals and proportional contribution of parasites in three estuaries.
Figure 2: Ecosystem-level biomass density of animal parasites in three estuaries.
Figure 3: Ecosystem-level biomass density of parasitically castrated (extended phenotypes) and uninfected phenotypes of hosts supporting parasitic castrators in three estuaries.
Figure 4: Standing crop biomass and cercarial productivity of trematodes in Cerithidea californica snails.


  1. Loreau, M., Roy, J. & Tilman, D. in Parasitism and Ecosystems (eds Thomas, F., Renaud, F. & Guégan, J.-F.) 13–21 (Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, 2005)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  2. Polis, G. A. & Strong, D. R. Food web complexity and community dynamics. Am. Nat. 147, 813–846 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Poulin, R. The functional importance of parasites in animal communities: many roles at many levels? Int. J. Parasitol. 29, 903–914 (1999)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Linderman, R. L. The trophic–dynamic aspect of ecology. Ecology 23, 399–418 (1942)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Odum, E. P. Strategy of ecosystem development. Science 164, 262–270 (1969)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Yodzis, P. & Innes, S. Body size and consumer–resource dynamics. Am. Nat. 139, 1151–1175 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Kuris, A. M. & Lafferty, K. D. in Evolutionary Biology of Host–Parasite Relationships: Theory Meets Reality (eds Poulin, R., Morand, S. & Skorping, A.) 9–26 (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 2000)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Lafferty, K. D. & Kuris, A. M. Trophic strategies, animal diversity and body size. Trends Ecol. Evol. 17, 507–513 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Dawkins, R. The Extended Phenotype: The Long Reach of the Gene (Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, 1982)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Erwin, R. M. Dependence of waterbirds and shorebirds on shallow-water habitats in the mid-Atlantic coastal region: An ecological profile and management recommendations. Estuaries 19, 213–219 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Spruzen, F. L., Richardson, A. M. M. & Woehler, E. J. Spatial variation of intertidal macroinvertebrates and environmental variables in Robbins Passage wetlands, NW Tasmania. Hydrobiologia 598, 325–342 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Allen, L. G. Seasonal abundance composition and productivity of the littoral fish assemblage in Upper Newport Bay, California. Fish. Bull. 80, 769–790 (1982)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ramer, B. A., Page, G. W. & Yoklavich, M. M. Seasonal abundance habitat use and diet of shorebirds in Elkhorn Slough, California. Western Birds 22, 157–174 (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  14. O’Brien, J. & Van Wyk, P. in Crustacean Issues: Factors in Adult Growth (ed. Wenner, A.) 191–218 (Balkema, Rotterdam, 1985)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Hechinger, R. F. et al. How large is the hand in the puppet? Ecological and evolutionary effects on body mass of 15 trematode parasitic castrators in their snail host. Evol. Ecol. 10.1007/s10682-008-9262-4 (in the press)

  16. Fingerut, J. T., Zimmer, C. A. & Zimmer, R. K. Patterns and processes of larval emergence in an estuarine parasite system. Biol. Bull. 205, 110–120 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Browne, R. A. & Russell-Hunter, W. D. Reproductive effort in molluscs. Oecologia 37, 23–27 (1978)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  18. Hughes, R. N. & Roberts, D. J. Reproductive effort of winkles (Littorina spp.) with contrasted methods of reproduction. Oecologia 47, 130–136 (1980)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  19. Arias-Gonzalez, J. E. & Morand, S. Trophic functioning with parasites: a new insight for ecosystem analysis. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 320, 43–53 (2006)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  20. McLusky, D. S. The Estuarine Ecosystem 2nd edn (Blackie, Glasgow, 1989)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  21. Calow, P. Pattern and paradox in parasite reproduction. Parasitology 86, 197–207 (1983)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Rigby, M. C., Hechinger, R. F. & Stevens, L. Why should parasite resistance be costly? Trends Parasitol. 18, 116–120 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Lochmiller, R. L. & Deerenberg, C. Trade-offs in evolutionary immunology: just what is the cost of immunity? Oikos 88, 87–98 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Lafferty, K. D., Dobson, A. P. & Kuris, A. M. Parasites dominate food web links. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 103, 11211–11216 (2006)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Lafferty, K. D. et al. in Disease Ecology: Community Structure and Pathogen Dynamics (eds Collinge, S. K. & Ray, C.) 119–134 (Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, 2006)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  26. Lafferty, K. D. & Morris, A. K. Altered behavior of parasitized killifish increases susceptibility to predation by bird final hosts. Ecology 77, 1390–1397 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Huxham, M. & Raffaelli, D. Parasites and food-web patterns. J. Anim. Ecol. 64, 168–176 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Thompson, R. M., Mouritsen, K. N. & Poulin, R. Importance of parasites and their life cycle characteristics in determining the structure of a large marine food web. J. Anim. Ecol. 74, 77–85 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Bush, A. O., Lafferty, K. D., Lotz, J. M. & Shostak, A. W. Parasitology meets ecology on its own terms: Margolis et al. revisited. J. Parasitol. 83, 575–583 (1997)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Peters, R. H. The Ecological Implications of Body Size (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 1983)

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references


We thank many assistants, in particular I. Jimenez, A. Kaplan, M. Saunders, J. Smith, A. Wood and the research team of L. Ladah. L. Ladah and the Huttinger family provided facilities for fieldwork. Satellite imagery of CSM was provided by K. Clarke. The University of California Natural Reserve System provided access to CSM. The National Science Foundation/National Institutes of Health Ecology of Infectious Diseases Program provided funding.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations


Corresponding author

Correspondence to Armand M. Kuris.

Supplementary information

Supplementary information

The file contains Supplementary Methods. (PDF 96 kb)

Supplementary information

The file contains Supplementary Data 1 with the standard errors and degrees of freedom associated with the stratified means and confidence limits depicted in all the figures. (XLS 30 kb)

PowerPoint slides

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kuris, A., Hechinger, R., Shaw, J. et al. Ecosystem energetic implications of parasite and free-living biomass in three estuaries. Nature 454, 515–518 (2008).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI:

This article is cited by


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing