Abstract
P16Ink4a is an important factor in carcinogenesis and its expression can be linked to oncogene-induced senescence. Oncogene-induced senescence is characterized by growth arrest and occurs as a consequence of oncogene activation due to KRAS or BRAF mutation. It has been shown that the induction of p16Ink4a in premalignant lesions and its loss during malignant transformation is an important mechanism in the carcinogenesis of several tumours. Loss of p16Ink4a is often caused by CDKN2A promoter hypermethylation. This mechanism of gene silencing is associated with the CpG island methylator phenotype (CIMP) in colorectal carcinomas, which is characterized by widespread promoter methylation. In particular, colorectal carcinomas with BRAF mutations have been shown to be strongly associated with CIMP. Also, BRAF mutations are strongly correlated with the serrated route to colorectal cancer. In this study, we investigated p16Ink4a expression and promoter methylation in BRAF-mutated serrated lesions of the colon. P16Ink4a expression was found to be upregulated in premalignant lesions and was lost in invasive serrated carcinomas. P16Ink4a expression and Ki67 expression were mutually exclusive, indicating that p16Ink4a acts as cell cycle inhibitor. Additionally, progression of malignant transformation in serrated lesions was accompanied by increasing methylation of the CDKN2A promoter. Therefore, our data provide evidence for oncogene-induced senescence in the serrated route to colorectal cancer with BRAF mutation and upregulation of p16Ink4a expression appears to be a useful indicator of induction of senescence. Loss of p16Ink4a expression occurs during malignant transformation and is caused mainly by aberrant methylation of the CDKN2A promoter.
Similar content being viewed by others
Main
P16Ink4a is a cell cycle inhibitor and an important factor in carcinogenesis. It controls p16Ink4a-dependent growth arrest and its expression can be linked to oncogene-induced senescence.1, 2, 3 Oncogene-induced senescence is characterized by an irreversible growth arrest and occurs as a consequence of oncogene activation due to KRAS or BRAF mutation.4, 5, 6 The rupture of oncogene-induced senescence is an important mechanism for malignant transformation and can be caused by genetic alterations leading to a loss of function of p16Ink4a. The induction of p16Ink4a in premalignant lesions and its loss during malignant transformation have been demonstrated in the carcinogenesis of the liver, lung and pancreas.7, 8, 9 Loss of p16Ink4a is often caused by CDKN2A (p16Ink4a) promoter hypermethylation.10 This mechanism of gene silencing is associated with the CpG island methylator phenotype (CIMP) of colorectal cancer, which implies widespread promoter methylation including CDKN2A.11, 12, 13, 14 Especially, colorectal carcinomas with BRAF mutations have been shown to be strongly associated with CIMP.15 In addition, BRAF mutations are strongly correlated with the serrated route to colorectal cancer comprising hyperplastic polyps, sessile serrated adenomas and traditional serrated adenomas as precancerous lesions.16, 17, 18
Most molecular studies of malignant transformation in the serrated route are dealing with promoter methylation of hMLH1 and the development of mismatch repair deficiency as well as high-degree microsatellite instability after loss of MLH1 expression. However, there are few analyses focussing on p16Ink4a. Up to now it is known that the expression of p16Ink4a is upregulated in hyperplastic polyps and sessile serrated adenomas19 and that promoter methylation of CDKN2A can be observed in serrated carcinomas.20, 21 Our work is the first comprehensive analysis of the expression and promoter methylation of CDKN2A in the spectrum of serrated lesions of the colon with BRAF mutation. Our findings of an initial p16Ink4a upregulation in premalignant serrated lesions and of a methylation-associated p16Ink4a downregulation during malignant transformation indicate an induction and loss of an oncogene-induced senescence barrier in colon carcinogenesis initiated by BRAF mutation.
Materials and methods
Specimens
Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue from 98 serrated tumour cases was taken from the archives of the Department of Pathology, Ludwig-Maximillians Universität, München. All samples were classified by two independent observers (TK and LK) applying the criteria of Torlakovic et al.22 Discrepancies were discussed until consensus was found. Our study enrolled hyperplastic polyps, sessile serrated adenomas without intraepithelial neoplasia, traditional serrated adenomas with low-grade intraepithelial neoplasia, sessile serrated adenomas with low-grade intraepithelial neoplasia, traditional serrated adenomas and sessile serrated adenomas with high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia and early invasive serrated ex-adenoma adenocarcinoma (pT1-category).
All cases were investigated with regard to BRAF and KRAS mutational status. Neither KRAS nor BRAF mutation was found in 15 cases. KRAS mutation was detected in 13 cases and BRAF mutation was found in 70 cases. KRAS-mutated lesions were enrolled in a previous study which was recently published.23 For the final case collection only the 70 tumours with BRAF mutation were included.
Immunohistochemistry
Immunohistochemical staining was done on 5 μm tissue sections of formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tumour samples. As primary antibodies, anti-p16Ink4a mouse monoclonal antibody (Diagnostic Biosystems, dilution 1:100) and anti-Ki67 monoclonal mouse antibody (DAKO, dilution 1:50) were used. Staining was performed on a Ventana Benchmark XT autostainer with the XT ultraView DAB Kit (Ventana Medical Systems). All slides were counterstained with Haematoxylin (Vector). To exclude unspecific staining, system controls were included. As positive controls for the immunohistochemistry, cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (p16Ink4a) and palatine tonsil (Ki67) were used.
KRAS−/BRAF Mutational and CDKN2A Hypermethylation Analyses
Analyses of mutation of KRAS codon 12/13 and BRAF(p.V600E) were done as described before.24 Briefly, genomic DNA was extracted from microdissected serrated lesions employing QIAamp® DNA FFPE Tissue kit (Qiagen, Hilden). In early invasive serrated ex-adenoma adenocarcinoma only invasive areas were microdissected and in serrated lesions with IEN only the region of IEN was investigated. For CDKN2A hypermethylation analyses, DNA was deaminated by bisulphite treatment using EZ DNA Methylation-Gold Kit (HiSS Diagnostics GmbH, Freiburg). Pyro-sequencing was done by subjecting the purified DNA to a p16Ink4a methyl specific PCR employing Empyromark Q24 p16 kit (Qiagen) and the subsequent analysis of the PCR products on a Q24 pyrosequencing device (Qiagen) together with Pyro-Gold kit (Qiagen). The data were analysed using the PyroMark™ Q24 software according to the manufacturer's recommendations.25, 26 All reactions and procedures were carried out as recommended by the respective user's manual.
Hypermethylation Score
DNA of the colon cancer cell line HCT116 that is hemimethylated for the CDKN2A promoter was used as internal control. Grade of hypermethylation was scored as hypermethylated, partially hypermethylated or not unmethylated in comparison with methylation status of HCT116 DNA which was between 40 and 45% within all seven CpG islands. For each case, the arithmetic average was taken regarding methylation status of the seven CpG islands. Unmethylated was defined as 0–20% methylation, partial methylation was defined as 21–55% methlyation and hypermethylated was defined as 56–100% methylation.
Results
Classification and Clinical Data of BRAF-Mutated Serrated Lesions
The final case collection included 70 tumours with BRAF mutation. It comprised 20 hyperplastic polyp (17 microvesicular type, 2 mucin-poor and 1 goblet-cell-rich), 24 sessile serrated adenomas without IEN, 2 sessile serrated adenomas with low-grade intraepithelial neoplasia, 8 sessile serrated adenomas with high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia, 10 traditional serrated adenomas with low-grade intraepithelial neoplasia, 1 traditional serrated adenoma with high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia and 5 early invasive serrated ex-adenoma adenocarcinoma. Details about the location and age of patients are given in Table 1.
p16Ink4a Expression and Hypermethylation of the CDKN2A Promoter
Immunohistochemical p16Ink4a expression is absent in normal colonic mucosa (Figure 1a). An upregulation of p16Ink4a can be detected in premalignant serrated lesions with BRAF mutation. A low and high expression pattern can be distinguished. The low expression pattern is characterized by an immunostaining of p16Ink4a in epithelial cells at the base of the crypts or in randomly distributed tiny spots of epithelial cells of the BRAF-mutated serrated lesions (Figure 1b). The high expression pattern is defined by confluent areas of epithelial cells with very strong immunostaining of p16Ink4a (Figure 1c).
The low expression pattern occurs in all hyperplastic polyps (100%), in the majority of sessile serrated adenomas (71%) and in almost half of the traditional serrated adenomas (45%) (Table 2). The high expression is seen only in sessile serrated adenomas and traditional serrated adenomas, but not in hyperplastic polyps. It is found more frequently in traditional serrated adenomas (37%) than in sessile serrated adenomas (15%). Few sessile serrated adenomas (15%) and traditional serrated adenomas (18%) and all early invasive adenocarcinoma (100%) are p16Ink4a negative.
Up and downregulation of p16Ink4a expression correlates with the presence of IEN and invasiveness. Almost all serrated lesions without IEN (93%) show low p16Ink4a expression (Table 3). High expression occurs mainly in adenomas with low-grade intraepithelial neoplasia (33%) or high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia (33%). On the other hand, loss of p16Ink4a is detected in more than half of polyps with high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia (56%) and in all early invasive ex-adenoma adenocarcinoma (100%). This indicates a switch from up to downregulation of p16Ink4a in the phase of high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia.
Immunohistochemical p16Ink4a expression correlates with hypermethylation of the CDKN2A promoter. No methylation is seen in normal mucosa and in the majority of hyperplastic polyps (80%) (Table 2). There is an increase of partial methylation or hypermethylation in sessile serrated adenomas (53%) compared with hyperplastic polyps (20%). Hypermethylation is most frequently observed in traditional serrated adenomas (45%) and early invasive adenocarcinoma (100%). Moreover, the detection of hypermethylation is very low in lesions without IEN (5%), increases in lesions with low-grade intraepithelial neoplasia (33%), occurs frequently in lesions with high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia (67%) and characterizes all lesions of early invasive adenocarcinoma (100%) (Table 3).
During serrated tumorigenesis from normal colonic mucosa to early invasive adenocarcinoma p16Ink4a expression and methylation status starts with p16Ink4a negativity without CDKN2A methylation, which is the finding of normal mucosa (100%) (Table 4). The end point of the serrated route is p16Ink4a negativity with CDKN2A promoter hypermethylation, which occurs in some sessile serrated adenomas (15%) and traditional serrated adenomas (18%) and in all early invasive adenocarcinoma (100%). In between, hyperplastic polyps, sessile serrated adenomas and traditional serrated adenomas exhibit low or high p16Ink4a expression with an increasing percentage of high expression from hyperplastic polyps (0%) to sessile serrated adenomas (15%) and to traditional serrated adenomas (37%) (Table 4).
Correlation of p16Ink4A Expression and the Ki67 Proliferation Index
Immunohistochemical Ki67 staining as an index of proliferation and p16Ink4a expression are mutually exclusive in serrated lesions (Figure 2a–h). Accordingly, in polyps with low p16Ink4a expression, which is mainly confined to the base of the crypts, the zone of proliferation moves towards the middle compartment of the elongated serrated crypts with no Ki67 staining at the base of the crypts (Figure 2c and d). An almost complete loss of Ki67 staining is seen in lesions with a high expression of p16Ink4a defined by confluent areas of positive cells (Figure 2e and f). Conversely, early invasive adenocarcinomas with loss of p16Ink4a expression are characterized by strong Ki67 staining indicating a high proliferation index.
Discussion
In this study, we demonstrate the absence of p16Ink4a expression in normal mucosa and its upregulation in BRAF-mutated serrated lesions of the colon. All hyperplastic polyps and the majority (84%) of sessile serrated adenomas and traditional serrated adenomas exhibit p16Ink4a expression. The expression of p16Ink4a and Ki67 is mutually exclusive in serial sections, indicating that p16Ink4a acts as cell cycle inhibitor. While all serrated lesions with low-grade intraepithelial neoplasia show low or high expression of p16Ink4a, serrated lesions with high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia are characterized either by a high expression or loss of p16Ink4a expression. All ex-adenoma serrated adenocarcinoma show a loss of p16Ink4a expression. This indicates a final loss of p16Ink4a during the process of malignant transformation and an up and downregulation of p16Ink4a in the serrated route to colon cancer.
Our observations are similar to investigations concerning human naevi where the concept of oncogene-induced senescence associated with BRAF mutation has been established. In melanocytic naevi, a stop of cell proliferation is correlated with a high p16Ink4a expression and found in combination with a frequent mutation in the BRAF oncogen. In the model proposed by Michaloglou et al,6 BRAF signalling primarily causes benign naevi exhibiting a limited growth due to an induction of senescence. This senescence barrier must be overcome by further genetic alterations for the development of malignant melanoma. Our data indicate an analogous process in human serrated polyps where oncogene-induced senescence driven by initiating BRAF mutations might cause a growth arrest and stop further malignant transformation. The loss of p16Ink4a expression due to hypermethylation of the CDKN2A promoter might overcome the senescence barrier and could enable further progression into invasive colon cancer (Figure 3).
Interestingly, ultrastructural studies have already demonstrated features of senescence in serrated polyps.21, 27 Our recent study of a mouse model shows additional support for the concept of oncogene-induced senescence in the serrated route. In this model, intestinal cell-specific expression of oncogenic K-rasG12D induced murine serrated polyps, which were characterized by p16Ink4a overexpression and induction of senescence. Deletion of the Ink4a/Arf locus in these K-rasG12D mice prevented senescence and correlated with the development of invasive, metastasizing carcinomas. These tumours exhibited morphological and molecular alterations comparable to human KRAS-mutated serrated carcinomas. In human KRAS-mutated serrated carcinomas decreased expression or loss of p16Ink4a was associated with CDKN2A promoter methylation in correspondence with our findings in human BRAF-mutated serrated lesions.23
Furthermore, it was recently published that oncogenic BRAFV600E mice show gastrointestinal serrated carcinogenesis. After a phase of high proliferation, the lesions developed a state of oncogene-induced senescence. This was overcome by methylation of the CDKN2A promoter leading to the development of invasive carcinomas.28 The mouse model confirms our findings in human serrated polyps.
Progression of malignant transformation in serrated lesions can be correlated with different degrees of CDKN2A promoter methylation. Serrated lesions without IEN or low-grade IEN exhibit no or only partial CDKN2A promoter methylation, whereas lesions with high-grade IEN or invasive carcinomas display in the majority of cases hypermethylation of the CDKN2A promoter. Therefore, the morphological stage of high-grade IEN can be correlated with a gradual loss of p16Ink4a expression and a concomitant loss of growth arrest. Thus, high-grade IEN appears to indicate the phase of which the senescence barrier is ruptured.
In conclusion, our data provide evidence for an oncogene-induced senescence in the serrated route to colorectal cancer with BRAF mutation. Upregulation of p16Ink4a expression appears to be a useful indicator of induction of senescence in BRAF-mutated serrated lesions. Loss of p16Ink4a expression is found during malignant transformation and is caused mainly by epigenetic silencing through aberrant methylation of the CDKN2A promoter.
References
Collado M, Blasco MA, Serrano M . Cellular senescence in cancer and aging. Cell 2007;130:223–233.
Campisi J, d’Adda di Fagagna F . Cellular senescence: when bad things happen to good cells. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2007;8:729–740.
Schmitt CA . Cellular senescence and cancer treatment. Biochim Biophys Acta 2007;1775:5–20.
Uhrbom L, Dai C, Celestino JC, et al. Ink4a-Arf loss cooperates with KRas activation in astrocytes and neural progenitors to generate glioblastomas of various morphologies depending on activated Akt. Cancer Res 2002;62:5551–5558.
Serrano M, Lin AW, McCurrach ME, et al. Oncogenic ras provokes premature cell senescence associated with accumulation of p53 and p16INK4a. Cell 1997;88:593–602.
Michaloglou C, Vredeveld LC, Soengas MS, et al. BRAFE600-associated senescence-like cell cycle arrest of human naevi. Nature 2005;436:720–724.
Gutierrez-Reyes G, del Carmen Garcia de Leon M, Varela-Fascinetto G, et al. Cellular senescence in livers from children with end stage liver disease. PLoS One 2010;5:e10231.
Jeong J, Park YN, Park JS, et al. Clinical significance of p16 protein expression loss and aberrant p53 protein expression in pancreatic cancer. Yonsei Med J 2005;46:519–525.
Dankort D, Filenova E, Collado M, et al. A new mouse model to explore the initiation, progression, and therapy of BRAFV600E-induced lung tumors. Genes Dev 2007;21:379–384.
Gonzalez-Quevedo R, Garcia-Aranda C, Moran A, et al. Differential impact of p16 inactivation by promoter methylation in non-small cell lung and colorectal cancer: clinical implications. Int J Oncol 2004;24:349–355.
Barault L, Charon-Barra C, Jooste V, et al. Hypermethylator phenotype in sporadic colon cancer: study on a population-based series of 582 cases. Cancer Res 2008;68:8541–8546.
Toyota M, Ahuja N, Ohe-Toyota M, et al. CpG island methylator phenotype in colorectal cancer. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1999;96:8681–8686.
Samowitz WS, Albertsen H, Herrick J, et al. Evaluation of a large, population-based sample supports a CpG island methylator phenotype in colon cancer. Gastroenterology 2005;129:837–845.
Ogino S, Cantor M, Kawasaki T, et al. CpG island methylator phenotype (CIMP) of colorectal cancer is best characterised by quantitative DNA methylation analysis and prospective cohort studies. Gut 2006;55:1000–1006.
Weisenberger DJ, Siegmund KD, Campan M, et al. CpG island methylator phenotype underlies sporadic microsatellite instability and is tightly associated with BRAF mutation in colorectal cancer. Nat Genet 2006;38:787–793.
Rashid A, Houlihan PS, Booker S, et al. Phenotypic and molecular characteristics of hyperplastic polyposis. Gastroenterology 2000;119:323–332.
Jass JR . Serrated adenoma and colorectal cancer. J Pathol 1999;187:499–502.
Jass JR, Biden KG, Cummings MC, et al. Characterisation of a subtype of colorectal cancer combining features of the suppressor and mild mutator pathways. J Clin Pathol 1999;52:455–460.
Sandmeier D, Benhattar J, Martin P, et al. Serrated polyps of the large intestine: a molecular study comparing sessile serrated adenomas and hyperplastic polyps. Histopathology 2009;55:206–213.
O’Brien MJ, Yang S, Mack C, et al. Comparison of microsatellite instability, CpG island methylation phenotype, BRAF and KRAS status in serrated polyps and traditional adenomas indicates separate pathways to distinct colorectal carcinoma end points. Am J Surg Pathol 2006;30:1491–1501.
Minoo P, Baker K, Goswami R, et al. Extensive DNA methylation in normal colorectal mucosa in hyperplastic polyposis. Gut 2006;55:1467–1474.
Torlakovic E, Skovlund E, Snover DC, et al. Morphologic reappraisal of serrated colorectal polyps. Am J Surg Pathol 2003;27:65–81.
Bennecke M, Kriegl L, Bajbouj M, et al. Ink4a/Arf and oncogene-induced senescence prevent tumor progression during alternative colorectal tumorigenesis. Cancer Cell 2010;18:135–146.
Neumann J, Zeindl-Eberhart E, Kirchner T, et al. Frequency and type of KRAS mutations in routine diagnostic analysis of metastatic colorectal cancer. Pathol Res Pract 2009;205:858–862.
Ogino S, Kawasaki T, Brahmandam M, et al. Sensitive sequencing method for KRAS mutation detection by Pyrosequencing. J Mol Diagn 2005;7:413–421.
Poehlmann A, Kuester D, Meyer F, et al. K-ras mutation detection in colorectal cancer using the Pyrosequencing technique. Pathol Res Pract 2007;203:489–497.
Hayashi T, Yatani R, Apostol J, et al. Pathogenesis of hyperplastic polyps of the colon: a hypothesis based on ultrastructure and in vitro cell kinetics. Gastroenterology 1974;66:347–356.
Carragher LA, Snell KR, Giblett SM, et al. V600EBraf induces gastrointestinal crypt senescence and promotes tumour progression through enhanced CpG methylation of p16INK4a. EMBO Mol Med 2010;2:458–471.
Acknowledgements
We thank A Sendelhofert, A Heier, H Prelle, S Liebmann and G Janssen for their expert support and experimental assistance.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kriegl, L., Neumann, J., Vieth, M. et al. Up and downregulation of p16Ink4a expression in BRAF-mutated polyps/adenomas indicates a senescence barrier in the serrated route to colon cancer. Mod Pathol 24, 1015–1022 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1038/modpathol.2011.43
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/modpathol.2011.43
Keywords
This article is cited by
-
Exploring and modelling colon cancer inter-tumour heterogeneity: opportunities and challenges
Oncogenesis (2020)
-
An update on the morphology and molecular pathology of serrated colorectal polyps and associated carcinomas
Modern Pathology (2019)
-
Erdheim-Chester Disease: a Concise Review
Current Rheumatology Reports (2019)
-
Serrated neoplasia—role in colorectal carcinogenesis and clinical implications
Nature Reviews Gastroenterology & Hepatology (2015)
-
A clinicopathological and molecular analysis of 200 traditional serrated adenomas
Modern Pathology (2015)