Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Application of GFP imaging in cancer



Multicolored proteins have allowed the color-coding of cancer cells growing in vivo and enabled the distinction of host from tumor with single-cell resolution. Non-invasive imaging with fluorescent proteins enabled the dynamics of metastatic cancer to be followed in real time in individual animals. Non-invasive imaging of cancer cells expressing fluorescent proteins has allowed the real-time determination of efficacy of candidate antitumor and antimetastatic agents in mouse models. The use of fluorescent proteins to differentially label cancer cells in the nucleus and cytoplasm can visualize the nuclear–cytoplasmic dynamics of cancer cells in vivo including: mitosis, apoptosis, cell-cycle position, and differential behavior of nucleus and cytoplasm that occurs during cancer-cell deformation and extravasation. Recent applications of the technology described here include linking fluorescent proteins with cell-cycle-specific proteins such that the cells change color from red to green as they transit from G1 to S phases. With the macro- and micro-imaging technologies described here, essentially any in vivo process can be imaged, giving rise to the new field of in vivo cell biology using fluorescent proteins.


‘...during periods of revolution when the fundamental tenets of a field are once more at issue, doubts are repeatedly expressed about the possibility of continued progress if one or another of the opposed paradigms is adopted.’

Thomas S. Kuhn in The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (3rd Edition, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago and London, 1996).


When the Nobel Prize in chemistry was awarded for the discovery of green fluorescent protein (GFP) in 2008, the Nobel Committee called GFP a guiding star for biochemistry enabling processes that were previously invisible, such as cancer cells spreading, to be strikingly visible. GFP and its red, blue, yellow, and orange cousins have revolutionized bio-medical research and enabled every major disease, both cause and effect, to ‘light-up’ in the laboratory for researchers to visualize, understand, and eventually conquer them. Fluorescent proteins allow us to visualize, in real time, all important aspects of cancer in living animals, including the cancer cell cycle, mitosis, apoptosis, motility, invasion, metastasis, and angiogenesis. Multicolored proteins have allowed the color-coding of cancer cells growing in vivo and enabled the distinction of host from tumor with single-cell resolution in vivo.1, 2

Fluorescent proteins of many different colors have now been characterized and these can be used to color-code cancer cells of a specific genotype or phenotype. For example, the behavior of cancer stem cells labeled with GFP and non-stem cells labeled with red fluorescent protein (RFP) can be simultaneously compared in vivo.3 The stroma and the cancer cells can be color-coded with fluorescent proteins. For example, a transgenic mouse expressing GFP in all of its cells (or in specific cells such as endothelial cells) transplanted with cancer cells expressing RFP enables the interaction between the cancer cells and the host cells to be visualized in real time.4, 5, 6

The long wavelength excitation of some fluorescent proteins, such as Katushka,7 also reduces the extent of photobleaching and enables deep imaging. Therefore, real-time imaging of tumor growth and metastasis can be carried out in the intact animal in deep tissues. For single-cell resolution, reversible skin flaps as well as chronic-transparent window models can be used over many parts of the body (skin, brain, lung, liver, etc.).8, 9, 10 Real-time imaging with fluorescent proteins is especially important when evaluating the efficacy of therapeutics on metastasis, tumor recurrence,11 and cell cycle dependence.12

Properties of GFP and Other Fluorescent Proteins as Imaging Agents

GFP and related fluorescent proteins are a family of proteins with emission spectra ranging from 442 to over 650 nm.13 There are many spectrally distinct fluorescent proteins resulting in a palette of colors14 that can be simultaneously imaged. Fluorescent proteins range in size from 25 to 30 kDa and form internal chromophores that do not require cofactors or substrates to fluoresce. Fluorescent proteins generally have very high extinction coefficients ranging up to approximately =95 000. In addition, fluorescent proteins have very high quantum yields up to 0.8.15 These properties make fluorescent proteins very bright. Two-photon absorption of GFP is important for deep-tissue imaging in vivo.10 Another important feature of fluorescent proteins is the spectral distinction between many members of the family, enabling of multicolor fluorescent proteins to be used simultaneously for multifunctional in vivo imaging. Spectral separation imaging is also very useful to distinguish different colors including autofluorescence.16

In Vivo Imaging with Fluorescent Proteins

Fluorescent proteins are so bright that simple equipment can be used for in vivo imaging. Macro-imaging studies require equipment as simple as an LED flashlight with appropriate excitation emission filters.17 In vivo images can even be acquired with a cell phone camera because fluorescent proteins are so bright!

A fluorescence light box with fiber-optic lighting at approximately 490 nm and appropriate filters, placed on top of the light box (Figure 1), can be used to image tumors and metastasis that can be viewed with a camera to enable the images to be displayed on a monitor and digitally stored.18 Excitation with a narrow band filter at approximately 490 nm should be used. Fluorescence emission can be observed through a 520 nm long-pass filter.18

Figure 1
figure 1

Imaging apparatus from simple to complex. (a) An example of the earliest prototype for in vivo imaging with GFP is the Illumatool, a simple instrument with light sources that are properly filtered to avoid autofluorescence and an emission filter through which it is possible to image GFP fluorescence from unrestrained animals.18 (b) Whole-body imaging of GFP- and RFP-expressing tumors implanted in the brain in a single nude mouse. The excitation light was produced with a simple blue-LED flashlight equipped with an excitation filter with a central peak of 470 nm (shown in the figure). The image was acquired with a Hamamatsu charge-coupled device (CCD) camera. (c) An example of the best state of the art, OV100 Small Animal Imaging System (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan). The OV100 contains an MT-20 light source (Olympus) and DP70 CCD camera (Olympus). The optics of the OV-100 fluorescence imaging system have been specially developed for macroimaging as well as microimaging with high light-gathering capacity. The instrument incorporates a unique combination of high numerical aperture and long working distance. Individually optimized objective lenses, parcentered and parfocal, provide a 105-fold magnification range for seamless imaging of the entire body down to the subcellular level without disturbing the animal. The OV-100 has the lenses mounted on an automated turret with a high magnification range of × 1.6 to × 16 and a field of view ranging from 6.9 to 0.69 mm. The optics and antireflective coatings ensure optimal imaging of multiplexed fluorescent reporters in small animals. High-resolution images are captured directly on a PC (Fujitsu Siemens, Munich, Germany).20

A powerful hand-held imaging device that inputs the image directly to a computer monitor can also be used.19

A variable-magnification small animals imaging system (OV100, Olympus Corp., Tokyo, Japan), containing an MT-20 light source (Olympus Biosystems, Planegg, Germany) and DP70 CCD camera (Olympus), can be used for macro- and subcellular imaging in live mice. The optics of the OV100 fluorescence imaging system have been specially developed for macroimaging as well as microimaging with high light-gathering capacity. The objectives have high numerical aperture and long working distance. Individually optimized objective lenses, parcentered and parfocal, provide a 105-fold magnification range for imaging of the entire body down to the subcellular level without disturbing the animal. The OV100 has lenses mounted on an automated turret with a high magnification range of × 1.6 to × 16 and a field of view ranging from 6.9 to 0.69 mm. The optics and anti-reflective coatings ensure optimal imaging of multiplexed fluorescent reporters in small animals (Figure 1).20

The use of tunable filters allows the isolation of any individual spectrum in any fluorescent pixel. This technique eliminates autofluorescence as well as enabling high-resolution spectral distinction when multiple fluorescent proteins are being used. Spectral resolution enables imaging of tumor on deep tissues or high-resolution non-invasive visualization of tumor blood vessels16 which express a fluorescent protein of a different color.

Ex Vivo Imaging Using Fluorescent Proteins

The first use of GFP for in vivo imaging, visualized cancer cells growing in athymic nude mice in our laboratory.21 Cancer cells were stably transfected with GFP and were transplanted into several mouse models, including orthotopic models that have a high metastatic capacity. Metastases could be observed in any organ at the single-cell level in unprocessed tissues. In addition, cells were visualized in the process of intravasation and extravasation. The visualization of single cancer cells in tissue is beyond the capabilities of standard histological techniques.

Intravital Imaging Using Fluorescent Proteins

Before our laboratory’s pioneering use of GFP for in vivo imaging, in vivo fluorescence imaging was limited to the visualization of cells that were transiently labeled with vital dyes. Use of fluorescent proteins, now allows the direct imaging of single cells in vivo for unlimited periods.

Reversible skin flaps can be introduced onto different parts of the animal to image single cancer cells or small colonies on internal organs.8 The skin flaps are reversed by simple suturing. External imaging can then be done through the relatively transparent body walls of the mouse, which include the skull, at the single-cell level, by use of a simple fluorescence dissecting microscope or more sophisticated equipment described in this review. Blood vessels growing on tumors can also be observed using skin-flaps because they contrast with the fluorescence of the tumors.8

With intravital microscopy,22 imaging through the opened skin or body walls of live mice visualizes single cancer cells. All steps in the metastatic process can be visualized. Individual, nondividing cells as well as micro- and macrometastases can be clearly visualized and quantified. Cellular details, such as pseudopodial projections, can be clearly seen.23 In early studies, Farina et al24 observed cancer cell invasion at the single-cell level, including intravasation and extravasation, using GFP-expressing cells. Condeelis et al25 used confocal GFP imaging to observe the polarity of cancer cells responding to chemotatic cytokines by intravital imaging.

Multiphoton Laser-Scanning Microscopy

Multiphoton laser-scanning microscopy26 can provide high-resolution to image deeper regions of GFP-expressing tumors.23, 24 Fukumura et al27, 28 monitored the activity of the vascular endothelial growth factor promoter in transgenic mice that expressed GFP under the control of this promoter. Multiphoton laser-scanning microscopy showed that the tumor was able to induce activity of this promoter and subsequent blood-vessel formation.27, 28

Color-Coded Imaging of Tumor Angiogenesis

Following transplantation of the RFP-expressing murine melanoma cell line B16F10 into transgenic mice in which the promoter of the gene coding for the stem cell-marker nestin drives GFP (ND-GFP), angiogenesis was visualized using dual-color fluorescence imaging. This was possible because ND-GFP was expressed in the proliferating endothelial cells and nascent blood vessels in the growing tumor which was labeled with RFP. Color-coded imaging demonstrated that doxorubicin inhibited tumor angiogenesis as well as tumor growth in these mice.29 The ND-GFP stem cells are endothelial cell precursors. For state-of-the-art information on nestin-GFP expression, please see Matsuzaki et al.30

Imaging GFP-Labeled Cancer Cells in Blood Vessels

Cancer cell trafficking in blood vessels was originally observed in real time after injection of GFP-expressing cancer cells in the tail vein of mice.31 Lung carcinoma cells32 and mammary cancer cells,33 both expressing GFP, interacted with the blood-vessel wall as seen via skin window chambers in rodents. Angiogenesis was induced by as few as 60–80 cancer cells. In the surrounding tissue, increased vasodilation and changes in blood-vessel morphology were also observed. Angiogenesis was also visualized using a GFP-expressing gliosarcoma rodent cell line.34

Hematogenous metastases containing GFP cancer cells were visualized in intact perfused mouse and rat lung. The GFP-expressing cells were visualized attached to the endothelia of pulmonary precapillary arterioles and capillaries as well as in colonies formed within the blood vessels.35, 36

PC-3-GFP human prostate cancer cells metastasized from the orthotopic site to within the blood vessels of the liver and the lung, where they proliferated. The intravascular cancer cells produced their own microenvironment, where they could continue to proliferate. Extravasation occurred earlier in the lung than in the liver.37

In order to study cytoplasmic and nuclear deformation, dual-color cancer cells expressing GFP in the nucleus and RFP in the cytoplams were injected intracardially. Cancer cells which reached capillaries elongated to fit the width of these vessels. The average length of the major axis of the cancer cells in the capillaries increased to 3.97 times their normal length and nuclei increased their length 1.64 times in the capillaries. Non-dividing cancer cells in capillaries over 8 μm in diameter could migrate up to 48.3 μm/h.38 The limits of cell migration may depend on deformation of the nucleus, as shown with the dual-color cancer cells expressing GFP in the nucleus and RFP in the cytoplasm.39

The nuclear and cytoplasmic behavior of dual-color cancer cells with GFP in the nucleus and RFP in the cytoplasm were imaged in real time in large blood vessels as they moved by various means or adhered to the vessel surface in the abdominal skin flap. During extravasation, real-time dual-color imaging showed that cytoplasmic processes of the cancer cells exited the vessels first, with nuclei following along the cytoplasmic projections. Both cytoplasm and nuclei underwent deformation during extravasation.20

HT-1080 human fibrosarcoma cells, were labeled with RFP (mCherry), linked to histone H2B, was expressed in the nucleus and GFP expressed in the cytoplasm. Cancer cells were injected in the epigastric cranialis vein in an abdominal flap of nude mice as an imaging model. The cell cycle position of individual living cells was visualized by the nuclear–cytoplasmic ratio and nuclear morphology. Real-time induction of apoptosis was observed by nuclear size changes and progressive nuclear fragmentation. Intra- and extravascular mitotic cells were also visualized. One hour after cell injection, round and elongated cancer cells were observed in the vessels. Five hours after injection, dual-color cancer cells began to divide within the vessel. By 10 h, some intravascular cancer cells underwent apoptosis. Deformed new blood vessels in the tumor were observed 10 days later. Extravascular cancer cells were imaged dividing in the tumor at day 14 after injection.40

GFP-expressing metastatic (MTLn3) and non-metastatic (MTC) cell lines, derived from the rat mammary adenocarcinoma 13762 NF cell line, were compared for their behavior in blood vessels. The metastatic cells had a greater affinity for blood vessels. In contrast, the non-metastatic cells lost part of their cytoplasm when interacting with the vessel wall, possibly as a result of the shearing of cell pseudopods that were inserted into the blood flow during intravasation.25

Cancer Cell Trafficking in Lymphatic Channels Imaged with RFP and RFP

GFP/RFP-labeled cancer cells trafficked through lymphatic vessels where they were imaged via a skin flap in real time at the cellular level until they entered an axillary lymph node.41

Transdifferentiation of Cancer Cells into Blood Vessel Cells

GFP-labeled colon carcinoma were also visualized interacting with blood vessels. These tumors had mosaic vessels with focal regions in which no CD31- or CD105-expressing immunoreactivity was detected and cancer cells appeared to contact the vessel lumen. The cancer cells appeared to form part of their own vasculature.42 Transplantation of glioma cells expressing GFP in transgenic mice ubiquitously expressing RFP demonstrated that tumor-derived endothelial cells originated from tumor-initiating cells and did not result from cell fusion of endothelial cells and cancer cells. Thus, cancer cells differentiated to endothelial cells which formed blood vessels within the tumor.43

Cancer Neurogenesis

In ND-GFP mice, GFP is also expressed in neural stem cells as well as nascent blood vessels. A human intramedullary spinal cord tumor transplanted to ND-GFP nude mice attracted nestin-GFP cells expressing neuronal class III-β-tubulin as well as CD31 expressing cells. Both cell types surrounded the tumor. These results suggest that the tumor stimulated both neurogenesis as well as angiogenesis.44

Imaging Metastatic Cells with GFP

The initial method used to introduce cancer cells into an animal model can affect the metastatic processes, with surgical orthotopic implantation (SOI) of tumor fragments resulting in the most patient-like model.45

Imaging Bone Metastasis

A GFP-expressing MDA-MB-435 human breast carcinoma cell line produced widespread osteolytic skeletal metastases following injection into the left ventricle of the heart.46 GFP expression also permitted ex vivo detection of single cells and microscopic metastases in bone at early time points.

Fragments of subcutaneously growing H460-GFP lung tumors were implanted by surgical orthotopic implantation in the left lung of nude mice. Subsequent micrometastases were visualized by GFP fluorescence in the contralateral lung, plural membrane and widely throughout the skeletal system including the skull, vertebra, femur, tibia, pelvis, and bone marrow of the femur and tibia.47

B16 GFP cells were i.v. injected in C57BL/6 mice and human LOX GFP melanoma cells intradermally injected in nude mice. Extensive bone and bone marrow metastases of B16 were visualized by GFP expression when the animals were killed. Metastases of both cell lines were visualized in many organs, including the brain, lung, pleural membrane, liver, kidney, adrenal gland, lymph nodes, skeleton, muscle, and skin by GFP fluorescence.48

PC-3-GFP prostate cancer cells produced extensive bone lesions when injected into the tibia of immunocompromised mice. The skeletal progression of the PC-3 cells could be monitored by GFP imaging, X-ray, and by measurements of tumor products in serum, including parathyroid hormone-related protein (PTHrP) and osteoprotegrin. The bisphosphonate, pamidronate, reduced tumor burden as assessed by imaging and biomarkers.49

In a subsequent study, another bisphosphonate, 3,3-dimethylaminopropane-1-hydroxy-1,1-diphosphonic acid (olpadronate) was the most effective bisphosphonate in reducing tumor burden as assessed by GFP imaging and radiography. The GFP tumor area and X-ray score significantly correlated. Reduced tumor growth in the bone was accompanied by reduced serum calcium, PTHrP, and osteoprotegrin.50

PC-3-GFP cells were transfected to express different forms of PTHrP and were injected intraskeletally. Skeletal progression of the prostate cancer cells was evaluated radiologically and by measurement of serum tumor markers. PTHrP transfection converted a non-invasive cell line into one that progressed in the skeleton: Injection of the PTHrP-transfected cells resulted in greater tumor progression in bone when compared with non-transfected cells, and this effect was also influenced by non-amino terminal peptides of PTHrP.51

Increased tumor progression was observed in PTHrP-overexpressing DU 145-GFP cells, whereas decreased progression was observed by PTHrP-knockdown in PC-3-GFP cells. PTHrP-overexpressing DU 145-GFP formed large tumors when implanted orthotopically into nude mice and resulted in spinal metastasis in one mouse, which was not observed in mice implanted with parental DU 145 cells. PTHrP-overexpressing DU 145-GFP cells also caused significant bone destruction when injected into the tibiae of nude mice, unlike parental DU 145 cells.52

Peyruchaud and colleagues53 established a GFP-expressing bone-metastasis subclone of MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cells (B02/GFP.2) that grows preferentially in bone. Whole-body fluorescence imaging of live mice showed that bone metastases could be detected about a week before radiologically distinctive osteolytic lesions developed. Furthermore, when the tumor-bearing mice were treated with a bisphosphonate, the progression of established osteolytic lesions and the expansion of the breast cancer cells in the bone were inhibited. Using whole-body GFP imaging, Peyruchaud et al54 also showed that the angiogenesis inhibitor angiostatin inhibited tumor growth in bone by inhibiting osteoclast activity.

Brain Metastasis

In early experiments, the human lung adenocarcinoma cell-line Anip 973 was transfected with GFP and stable high-level GFP-expressing transfectants were established. GFP-expressing cells were injected intravenously in nude mice as an experimental metastasis model. Intravenously injected mice had metastases in the brain and other organs as detected by GFP expression in fresh tissue.55

In subsequent experiments, bright and highly stable GFP-expressing transfectants of the B16 mouse malignant-melanoma cell line and the LOX human-melanoma line were made. Metastases for both cell lines were visualized in many organs as described above, including the brain by GFP fluorescence.48

PC-3-GFP growing orthotopically in nude mice formed micrometastases and metastases in the central nervous system in many organs, including the brain and spinal cord as visualized by GFP imaging.56

Androgen-dependent variants of the LNCaP human prostate cancer were developed, which were more tumorigenic and exhibited invasion and metastasis compared with the parent LNCaP cells. Orthotopic transplantation of the androgen-independent variants of LNCaP expressing GFP resulted in multi-organ metastasis including the brain.57

Orthotopic transplantation of the murine Lewis lung carcinoma (LLC)-GFP resulted in rapid tumor growth in nude mice and extensive metastasis visualized by GFP expression. Brain metastases were visualized in 30% of the animals.58

LLC cells, stably expressing GFP, were injected in the chick embryo chorioallantoic membrane. GFP-LLC metastases were visualized by fluorescence, 7 days additional incubation, in the brain and other organs, with the most frequent site being the brain.59

An orthotopic retinoblastoma (RB) model was established with human RB cells expressing GFP. RB-GFP cells were injected into the subretinal space of nude mice. The growth of transplanted RB was observed in vivo using fluorescence stereomicroscopy. Metastasis to the cranium along the optic nerve was observed, with green fluorescent RB cells migrating along the optic nerve sheath and long posterior ciliary artery.60

Two nasopharyngeal carcinoma cell lines stably expressing GFP, 5-8F-GFP and 6-10B-GFP, were established. The cells were orthotopically injected into the nasopharynx. Whole-body fluorescence imaging was used to monitor the growth of the primary tumor as well as angiogenesis and metastasis, which demonstrated brain metastasis of 5-8-F GFP. Cell line 6-10B was less metastatic, but occasionally resulted in pulmonary metastasis. GFP enabled imaging of micrometastasis. 5-8F was highly sensitive to 5-fluorouracil, whereas 6-10B was moderately sensitive.61

To develop an imageable, patient-like model of spinal cord glioma, U87 human glioma tumor fragments expressing RFP grown in nude mice were transplanted by surgical orthotopic implantation into the spinal cord of non-transgenic nude mice or transgenic nude mice expressing ND-GFP as described above. The intramedullary spinal cord tumor grew at the primary site, caused hind-limb paralysis, and also metastasized to the brain.44 Primary tumor size was significantly reduced by temozolomide treatment compared with untreated controls and brain metastases were found only in the control group. Histological analysis of the control group showed aggressive tumor invasion in the spinal cord. In contrast, temozolomide-treated animals showed mostly scar tissue after tumor transplantation.44

Multiphoton laser scanning microscopy was used to image brain metastasis formation in real time at the single-cell level. Brain metastases arrested at vascular branch points and were closely associated with microvessels. Long-term dormancy was observed for some of the brain metastatic cells.62

Estrogen-receptor-positive breast cancer cells expressing GFP, resistant to puromycin and non-tumorigenic without exogenous estrogen, were injected intracardially into mice that already had growing orthotopic tumors formed by estrogen-receptor -negative cells resistant to the antibiotic G418. A variant cell line containing both estrogen-dependent and -independent cells was isolated from GFP-expressing cells in the bone marrow, which was resistant to both puromycin and G418, suggesting its origin from the fusion of the two cells types. The fused cells were also metastatic to the brain detected by GFP, unlike parental cells. It was suggested that cell fusion can contribute to brain metastasis ability.63

The effect of UVC irradiation was investigated on a model of experimental brain metastasis. For the brain metastasis model, lung cancer cells were injected intra-carotidally or stereotactically. The LLC line was used for the experimental brain metastasis model. The cancer cells were double-labeled with GFP in the nucleus and RFP in the cytoplasm. A craniotomy open window was used to image single cancer cells in the brain. The double-labeling of cancer cells with GFP and RFP enabled apoptosis of single cells to be imaged at the subcellular level through the craniotomy open window in live mice in real time. UVC irradiation, beamed through the craniotomy open window, induced apoptosis in the cancer cells. UVC irradiation was effective on LLC and significantly extended survival of the mice with experimental brain metastasis (Figure 2).64

Figure 2
figure 2

Real-time imaging of apoptotic cell death in the brain in live mice. (a) Seven days after dual-color Lewis lung carcinoma (LLC) cell inoculation via the internal carotid artery, the cells were irradiated for 60 s with UVC. (b) Three hours after irradiation, aggregation of chromatin at the nuclear membrane (arrow) and fragmented nuclei (arrowheads) were observed. (c) Six hours after irradiation, the nuclei appeared to form numerous additional fragments and destruction of RFP-expressing cytoplasm was observed (scale bars, a,b: 100 mm; c: 20 mm).64

The dual-color LLC cells were imaged through the craniotomy open window 10 days after treatment with temozolomide. After treatment, dual-color cancer cells with fragmented nuclei were visualized, indicating apoptosis. GFP-expressing apoptotic bodies and the destruction of RFP-expressing cytoplasm were also visualized in real time in nude mice through the craniotomy open window.65

Mitosis of the individual metastatic cancer cells on the brain were imaged dynamically in real time through the craniotomy open window. This model can be used to evaluate brain metastasis and brain cancer at the subcellular level including their sensitivity to currently used and experimental drugs (Figure 3).66

Figure 3
figure 3

Time-course dynamic imaging of a dual-color Lewis lung carcinoma (LLC) cell undergoing mitosis in the brain visualized through a craniotomy window with the OV100 imaging system. Arrows point to the same cell undergoing mitosis.66

BALB/c or SCID mice were injected intracardially with either 4T1-GFP or MDA231BR-GFP breast cancer cells, and they subsequently formed brain metastasis. Antibody neutralization of either ALCAM or VLA-4 significantly reduced tumor seeding within the brain, suggesting that ALCAM/ALCAM and VLA-4/VCAM-1 interactions are important in the early stages of metastasis seeding in the brain.67

The mTOR inhibitor, rapamycin and Temsirolimus-CCI-779, inhibited brain metastasis of MDA-MB-231-BR and CN34-BrM2 cancer cells expressing GFP.68 Sunitinib and dasatinib were visualized to inhibit brain metastases derived from human breast cancer MDA-MB-231-BR cells expressing GFP.69 4T1-BrM5-GFP breast cancer cells administered into mammary fat pads of Balb/c mice subsequently formed brain metastasis. The substance P inhibitor spantide III reduced cancer cell colonization in the brain. Substance P inhibition in combination with other therapies may prevent breaching the blood-brain barrier by breast cancer cells and their colonization in the brain.70 Sunitinib and dasatinib are multi-kinase inhibitors that may target metastasis.69

Role of Stroma and Other Host Cells in Metastasis

Human colon cancer cells that express GFP in the nucleus and RFP in the cytoplasm (HCT-116-GFP-RFP) were injected in either the portal vein (pv) or spleen of transgenic nude mice expressing GFP and imaged at the subcellular level in vivo. Extensive clasmocytosis (destruction of the cytoplasm) of the cancer cells occurred within 6 h after pv injection and essentially all the cancer cells died. In contrast, splenic injection of these cancer cells resulted in the aggressive formation of liver and distant metastasis. GFP spleen cells were found in the liver metastases that resulted from intrasplenic injection of the cancer cells. When spleen cells and the cancer cells were coinjected in the pv, liver metastasis resulted that contained GFP spleen cells. These results suggest that the splenocytes are not just passengers but are required for liver metastasis.71

Subsequent studies have shown that the metastatic cells can bring their own stromal components, including activated fibroblasts, from the primary site to the lungs. Viability of circulating metastatic cancer cells is higher if they are in emboli with stroma and have a growth advantage in the lung, confirming that stromal cells drive metastasis.72

Human HCT-116-GFP-RFP colon cancer and mouse mammary tumor (MMT-RFP-GFP) cells were imaged in the pv of nude mice. Most HCT-116-GFP-RFP cells remained in sinusoids near peripheral portal veins. Only a small fraction of the cancer cells invaded the lobular area. Extensive clasmocytosis of the HCT-116-GFP-RFP cells occurred within 6 h. Apoptosis was imaged in the dual-color cells by their altered nuclear morphology. In contrast, dual-color MMT-GFP-RFP cells injected into the pv mostly survived in the liver of nude mice 24 h after injection. The cells grew aggressively and formed colonies in the liver. However, when the host mice were pretreated with cyclophosphamide, the HCT-116-GFP-RFP cells also survived and formed colonies in the liver after pv injection. These results suggest that a cyclophosphamide-sensitive host cellular system attacked the HCT-116-GFP-RFP cells but could not effectively kill the MMT-GFP-RFP cells. This cyclophosphamide-sensitive cellular system appears to inhibit metastasis of some cancer cell types and not others.73

In another study that shows cyclophosphamide pre-treatment can drive metastasis, HT1080-GFP-RFP human fibrosarcoma cells with GFP in the nucleus and RFP in the cytoplasm were injected into the epigastric cranialis vein of nude mice. Twenty-four hours before cancer cell injection, cyclophosphamide was given i.p. and greatly increased metastasis of HT-1080 GFP-RFP cells. Cyclophosphamide seems to interfere with a host process that inhibits intravascular proliferation, extravasation, and extravascular colony formation of cancer cells, which are important events in metastasis. Cyclophosphamide does not directly affect the cancer cells because cyclophosphamide was cleared by the time the cancer cells were injected.74

Identifying Clonality of Metastasis with GFP and RFP Imaging

GFP-labeled and RFP-labeled HT-1080 human fibrosarcoma cells were co-injected in the tail vein in order to determine clonality by fluorescence visualization of metastatic colonies. Pure red or pure green colonies were scored as clonal, whereas mixed red and green colonies were non-clonal. The clonality of the lung metastases was found to be dependent on the number of cells injected. Spontaneous metastasis were often clonal and experimental metastasis were often non-clonal.9, 75

Imaging Circulating Tumor Cells (CTCs) with GFP

GFP-expressing PC-3 implanted orthotopically produced viable CTCs, but tumors of the same lineage did not when implanted subcutaneously. GFP-labeled circulating cells were more metastatic than the RFP-labeled parental cells when they were co-implanted in the prostate.76

Mixtures of RFP- and GFP-expressing PC-3 human prostate carcinoma cells were implanted in the nude mouse prostate and metastasized. Yellow fluorescent PC-3 cells were observed and isolated from the circulation. The yellow fluorescent phenotype was heritable and stably maintained by cancer cells for many generations in vitro and in vivo. In the animals implanted with the yellow-fluorescing cells, 100% developed aggressive lung metastases. In contrast, when the GFP- and RFP-expressing parental cells were separately inoculated into the mouse prostate, none of the animals developed lung metastasis. All co-implanted animals had almost exclusively yellow fluorescent cells in the blood and bone marrow. These results are consistent with the idea that spontaneous genetic exchange occurring between cancer cells in vivo contributes to genomic instability and creation of highly metastatic cells.77

In another study, using color-coded imaging of high-metastatic and low-metastatic osteosarcoma, it was observed that the high-metastatic phenotype could be transferred to the low-metastatic cells. The K-ras and possibly other genes were involved in conferring the high-metastatic phenotype.78

Metastatic human prostate carcinoma cells selected for survival in the circulation have increased resistance to anoikis, which is apoptosis induced by cell detachment.79

Using the GFP-expressing PC-3 orthotopic model and immunomagnetic beads coated with anti-epithelial cell adhesion molecule and anti-prostate specific membrane antigen, GFP-expressing CTCs were isolated within 15 min and were readily visualized by GFP fluorescence. It was possible to immediately place the immunomagnetic-bead-captured GFP-expressing PC-3 CTCs in three-dimensional Gelfoam® sponge-gel cell culture, where they proliferated.80

The PC-3-GFP CTCs were then expanded in culture in parallel with the parental PC-3-GFP cell line. Both cell types were then inoculated onto the chorioallantoic membrane of chick embryos. Eight days later, embryos were harvested and the brains were processed for frozen sections. The IV100 intravital laser scanning microscope enabled rapid identification of fluorescent metastatic foci within the chick embryonic brain. Inoculation of embryos with PC-3-GFP CTCs resulted in a 3–10-fold increase in brain metastasis when compared with the parental PC-3-GFP cells.81

The PC-3-GFP CTC had a significantly increased sensitivity to both cisplatin and docetaxel when compared with PC-3 GFP parental cells, with docetaxel having the greater efficacy.82

Imaging Quiescent or Dormant Cancer Cells

Fluorescent protein probes were developed, which label individual G1 phase nuclei red and those in S/G2/M phases green. This system is called a fluorescence ubiquitination-based cell cycle indicator (FUCCI).12

FUCCI 3D confocal imaging demonstrated that cancer cells in G0/G1 phase in Gelfoam® histoculture migrated more rapidly and further than cancer cells in S/G2/M phases. Cancer cells ceased migrating when they entered S/G2/M phases and restarted migrating after cell division when the cells re-entered G0/G1. Migrating cancer cells also were resistant to cytotoxic chemotherapy, because they were preponderantly in G0/G1, where cytotoxic chemotherapy is not effective (Figure 4).83

Figure 4
figure 4

Invasive cancer cells are predominantly in G0/G1. FUCCI-expressing cancer cells (5 × 106) were placed on Gelfoam® (1 × 1 cm) in RPMI 1640 medium. (a) High-magnification real-time images of invading cancer cells cultured on Gelfoam® for 48 h. Arrows show the direction of invading cancer cells. (b) Histogram shows cell cycle phase of invading cancer cells.83

FUCCI imaging showed that approximately 90% of cancer cells in the center and 80% of total cells of an established tumor are in G0/G1 phase. Similarly, approximately 75% of cancer cells far from (>100 μm) tumor blood vessels of an established tumor are in G0/G1. Longitudinal real-time imaging demonstrated that cytotoxic agents killed only proliferating cancer cells at the surface and, in contrast, had little effect on quiescent cancer cells, which are the vast majority of an established tumor. Moreover, resistant quiescent cancer cells restarted cycling after the cessation of chemotherapy (Figure 5a,b).84

Figure 5
figure 5

Cell-cycle phase distribution of cancer cells at the tumor surface and center. (a) FUCCI-expressing MKN45 human stomach cancer cells were implanted directly in the liver of nude mice and imaged at 35 days. (b) Histogram shows the cell-cycle distribution in the tumor at 35 days after implantation. (c) Representative 3D reconstruction images of a nascent tumor at 35 days after implantation. Data are means (each group n=5). Scale bars represent 100 μm.84 (d) S.typhimurium A1-R decoys the cell cycle transit of quiescent cancer cells in tumors in vivo. Representative images of a cross-section of FUCCI-expressing MKN45 tumor xenograft treated with S.typhimurium A1-R or untreated control.86

FUCCI imaging demonstrated that OBP-301 adenovirus decoyed quiescent cancer cells to advance from G0/G1 to S/G2/M phases by mobilizing cell-cycle-related proteins. OBP-301 decoyed quiescent cancer stem-like cells in tumor spheres and also decoyed tumors in vivo into S/G2/M phases where they became chemosensitive.85 Tumor-targeting Salmonella typhimurium A1-R also decoyed quiescent cancer cells to cycle and become chemosensitive (Figure 5d).86

Imageable Color-Coded Tumor-Host Models

Dual-color fluorescence imaging can be effected by using RFP-expressing tumors growing in GFP-expressing transgenic mice. Tumor–stroma interaction, especially tumor-induced angiogenesis and tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes can be readily imaged in the model. GFP-expressing dendritic cells were observed contacting RFP-expressing cancer cells with their dendrites. GFP-expressing macrophages were observed engulfing RFP-expressing cancer cells. GFP lymphocytes were seen surrounding cells of the RFP tumor, which eventually regressed (Figures 6 and 7).4

Figure 6
figure 6

Visualization of angiogenesis in live tumor tissue 3 weeks after s.c. injection of B16F10-RFP melanoma cells in the transgenic GFP mouse. Well developed, host-derived GFP-expressing blood vessels are visualized in the RFP-expressing mouse melanoma.4

Figure 7
figure 7

Visualization of host macrophage–tumor cell interaction in fresh tumor tissue. Images show host macrophages expressing GFP interacting with human PC-3-RFP prostate cancer cells on day 35 after orthotopic implantation of PC-3-RFP cells in the transgenic GFP nude mouse. (a) Host GFP macrophage (arrowhead) contacting RFP cancer cell (arrow). (b) GFP macrophage (arrowhead) engulfing RFP cancer cell (arrow). (c) RFP cancer cell (arrow) engulfed by GFP macrophage (arrowhead). (d) RFP cancer cell (arrows) digested by GFP macrophage (arrowhead). (Scale bars, 20 μm.)4

HT-1080-GFP-RFP human fibrosarcoma cells were visualized surrounded by host-derived lymphocytes and macrophages, both expressing GFP. It was possible to observe host GFP macrophages contacting, engulfing, and digesting dual-color HT-1080-GFP-RFP cells in real time. The dual-color cancer cells were readily visible after being engulfed in the GFP macrophages. Other cancer cells were visualized being killed by lymphocytes (Figure 8).87

Figure 8
figure 8

Visualization of host macrophage-cancer cell interaction in live mice. (a) Host GFP macrophages (arrow, broken arrow) were visualized contacting HT-1080-GFP-RFP cells. Macrophage processes can be seen extending into the HT-1080-GFP-RFP cells (arrowhead). Another macrophage (broken arrow) contained cytoplasmic fragments after digesting an HT-1080-GFP-RFP cell. (b) A macrophage (arrow) engulfing the RFP-expressing cytoplasm of an HT-1080 cell shown in contact with additional HT-1080-GFP-RFP cells (broken arrows). Bar=20 μm.87

The Olympus IV100 Laser Scanning Microscope, with ultra-narrow microscope objectives (‘stick objectives’), was used for non-invasive three-color whole-body imaging of GFP-RFP expressing cancer cells with GFP in the nucleus and RFP in the cytoplasm interacting with the GFP-expressing stromal cells in their transgenic nude-mouse host footpad. In this model, drug response of both cancer and stromal cells in the intact live animal was also imaged in real time. Tumor–host interaction and cellular dynamics were non-invasively imaged, including mitotic and apoptotic tumor cells, stromal cells interacting with the cancer cells, tumor vasculature, and tumor blood flow.88

Human tumors grew extensively in nestin-driven (ND-GFP) transgenic nude mice. ND-GFP was shown to be highly expressed in proliferating endothelial cells and nascent blood vessels in the growing tumors, visualized by dual-color fluorescence imaging as described above. Results of immunohistochemical staining showed that CD31 was expressed in the ND-GFP-expressing nascent blood vessels.89

The tumor microenvironment (TME) has an important influence on tumor progression. Six different implantation models were developed to image the TME using multiple colors of fluorescent proteins: (i) RFP- or GFP-expressing HCT-116 human colon cancer cells were implanted subcutaneously in cyan fluorescent protein (CFP)-expressing nude mice. CFP stromal cells from the subcutaneous TME were visualized interacting with the RFP- or GFP-expressing tumors. (ii) RFP-expressing HCT-116 cells were transplanted into the spleen of CFP nude mice, which resulted in experimental metastases formed in the liver. CFP stromal cells from the liver TME were visualized interacting with the RFP-expressing tumor. (iii) RFP-expressing HCT-116 cancer cells were injected in the tail vein of CFP-expressing nude mice, forming experimental metastases in the lung. CFP stromal cells from the lung were visualized interacting with the RFP-expressing tumor. (iv) In order to visualize two different tumors in the TME, GFP- and RFP-expressing HCT-116 cancer cells were co-implanted subcutaneously in CFP-expressing nude mice. A three-color TME was formed subcutaneously in the CFP mouse, and CFP stromal cells were visualized interacting with the RFP- and GFP-expressing tumors. (v) In order to have two different colors of stromal cells, GFP-expressing HCT-116 cells were initially injected subcutaneously in RFP-expressing nude mice. After 14 days, the tumor, which consisted of GFP cancer cells and RFP stromal cells derived from the RFP nude mouse, was harvested and transplanted into the CFP nude mouse. CFP stromal cells invaded the growing transplanted tumor containing GFP cancer cells and RFP stroma. (vi) MMT cells expressing GFP in the nucleus and RFP in the cytoplasm were implanted in the spleen of a CFP nude mouse. Cancer cells were imaged in the liver 3 days after cell injection. The dual-color dividing MMT cells and CFP hepatocytes, as well as CFP non-parenchymal cells of the liver were imaged interacting with the two-color cancer cells. CFP-expressing host cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) (Figure 9) were predominantly observed in the TME models developed in the CFP nude mouse (Figure 10).90

Figure 9
figure 9

Interactions (arrows) of host stromal GFP-expressing fibroblast cell (small arrow) and Dunning RFP-expressing rodent prostate cancer cells (large arrows) in live tumor tissue. Scale bar, 20 μm.121

Figure 10
figure 10

Dual-color mouse mammary tumor (MMT) cells with GFP in the cytoplasm and RFP in the nucleus, growing in the liver of a CFP nude mouse after splenic injection. Dual-color MMT cells formed tumors in the liver of a CFP mouse 28 days after splenic injection. CFP, non-parenchymal liver cells (yellow arrows), and dual-color MMT cancer cells (red arrows) were visualized simultaneously. The image was taken with an FV1000 confocal microscope. (Bar=50 μm).90

Non-colored HCT-116 human colon cancer cells were injected in the spleen of GFP nude mice which led to the formation of experimental liver metastasis. The TME of the liver metastasis was imaged. GFP-expressing host cells were recruited by the metastatic tumors as visualized by fluorescence imaging. A desmin-positive area increased around and within the liver metastasis over time, suggesting CAFs were recruited by the liver metastasis, which appeared to have a role in tumor progression of the metastasis.91

Patient pancreatic tumors were passaged orthotopically in transgenic nude mice ubiquitously expressing RFP. The primary patient tumors acquired RFP-expressing stroma. The RFP-expressing stroma included CAFs and tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs). Further passage to transgenic nude mice ubiquitously expressing GFP resulted in tumors that acquired GFP stroma in addition to their RFP stroma, including CAFs and TAMs as well as blood vessels. The RFP stroma persisted in the tumors growing in the GFP mice. Further passage to transgenic nude mice ubiquitously expressing CFP resulted in tumors acquiring CFP stroma in addition to persisting RFP and GFP stroma, including RFP- and GFP-expressing CAFs, TAMs and blood vessels.92

After unlabeled primary patient tumors acquired GFP-expressing stroma by passage in GFP mice, subsequent liver metastases and disseminated peritoneal metastases carried the stroma from the primary tumor, and recruited additional GFP-expressing stroma, resulting in the very bright fluorescence of the metastasis. The GFP-expressing stroma included CAFs and TAM in both the primary and metastatic tumors.93

Patient pancreatic tumors previously passaged orthotopically into transgenic nude mice ubiquitously expressing GFP and subsequently to nude mice ubiquitously expressing RFP, where they acquired very bright GFP and RFP stroma, respectively, were then orthotopically passaged to non-transgenic nude mice. It was possible to image the brightly fluorescent tumors non-invasively longitudinally as they progressed in the non-transgenic nude mice (Figure 11).94

Figure 11
figure 11

(a) Whole-body non-invasive imaging of human pancreatic cancer orthotopic tumor in non-transgenic nude mice. Mice were non-invasively imaged at day 21 (upper panel), day 30 (middle panel), and day 74 (lower panel). The tumors in the non-transgenic nude mice are in the F4 passage after F1, in NOD/SCID mice after patient surgery; F2, in transgenic green fluorescent protein (GFP)-expressing nude mice; and F3 in transgenic red fluorescent protein (RFP)-expressing nude mice. The tumor acquired GFP and RFP stroma in the F2 and F3 passages, respectively. Images were obtained with the Olympus OV100 Small Animal Imaging System. (b) Image of human pancreatic cancer tumor tissue resected from the F4 passage with RFP and GFP stroma. Image was obtained with an FV1000 confocal laser microscope. Yellow arrows indicate RFP-expressing cancer-associated fibroblast cells (CAFs). Blue arrows indicate GFP-expressing CAFs.94

Color-Coding Cancer Stem Cells and Non-Stem Cells

The differential behavior of cancer stem-like and non-stem cells was simultaneously distinguished in the same tumor by real-time color-coded imaging. CD133+ Huh-7 human hepatocellular carcinoma cells were considered as cancer stem-like cells, and CD133 Huh-7 cells were considered as non-stem cancer cells. CD133+ cells were labeled with GFP and CD133 cells were labeled with RFP. GFP-cancer stem-like cells were highly tumorigenic and metastatic as well as very resistant to chemotherapy in vivo compared with RFP- non-stem cancer cells.3

Use of Fluorescent Protein Imaging to Evaluate Therapeutics

Human pancreatic cancer cell line MiaPaCa-2-RFP formed widespread metastases after orthotopic implants in mice. Gemcitabine greatly improved survival by inducing transient tumor regression over the first 3 weeks. However, at this time, non-invasive imaging visualized tumor growth and dissemination which occurred despite continued treatment, suggesting the development of tumor resistance to gemcitabine. Drug efficacy was followed noninvasively in real time by imaging the RFP-expressing tumor and metastases, and was confirmed by fluorescence open imaging of autopsy specimens.95

Mice with orthotopic, MiaPaCa-2 RFP pancreatic cancer were subsequently treated with gemcitabine on a low metronomic dose schedule (METG) or maximum tolerated dose (MTDG) schedule with or without sunitinib. Treatment with METG suppressed metastasis at multiple sites, an effect enhanced by sunitinib.96

Clinical Application and Potential Clinical Application of GFP Imaging

The telomerase-specific replication-selective adenovirus expressing GFP (OBP-401) was able to detect viable human CTCs in peripheral blood ex vivo. The fluorescence signal was amplified only in viable, infected CTC by viral replication.97 OBP-401-GFP labeled both epithelial and mesenchymal CTCs, providing a non-invasive alternative to tissue biopsy or surgical resection of primary tumors for companion diagnostics.98

Fong et al99 used a herpes simplex virus (NV1066) vector that expresses the gfp gene to label, in a mouse model, metastatic lung tumor foci of less than 1 mm located in the pleural cavity. The tumor foci became fluorescent because NV1066 selectively replicates in cancer cells and expresses GFP. The fluorescently labeled tumors were detected by using a thoracoscopic endoscope system (which can be inserted into the thoracic cavity) equipped with fluorescent filters. Thus, fluorescent proteins have the potential for tumor diagnosis.

Kishimoto et al100 selectively and accurately labeled existing tumors in mice with GFP using the OBP-401 telomerase-dependent GFP-containing adenovirus (Figure 12). The labeled tumors could then be resected under fluorescence guidance. Tumors that recurred after fluorescence-guided surgery maintained GFP expression.101 Because the recurrent cancer cells stably express GFP, detection of cancer recurrence and metastasis is also possible with OBP- 401 GFP labeling. Maintenance of label in recurrent tumors is not possible with nongenetic probes.102

Figure 12
figure 12

Fluorescence-guided surgical removal of peritoneal disseminated HCT-116 tumors after GFP labeling with OBP-401 telomerase-dependent GFP-containing adenovirus. Non-colored HCT-116 human colon cancer cells were injected into the abdominal space of nude mice. Ten days later, 1 × 108 PFU of OBP-401 were i.p. injected. (a) Disseminated nodules were efficiently labeled and noninvasively visualized by GFP expression 5 days after virus administration. (b) Under general anesthesia, laparotomy was performed to remove intra-abdominal disease under GFP-guided navigation. (c) Disseminated nodules visualized by GFP-guided navigation were removed. (Scale bars: a–c, 10 mm). (d) Frozen section of resected HCT-116 disseminated nodules with fluorescence detection. (Scale bar, 500 μm). (e) H&E section of HCT-116 disseminated nodules shown in d. The box outlines a region of d and e analyzed in f. (Scale bar, 500 μm). (f) Detail of the boxed region of d and e. (Scale bar, 50 μm).100

U87-RFP human glioma cells, expressing RFP, were injected stereotactically into the nude mouse brain through a craniotomy open window. Resulting gliomas were resected under fluorescence guidance or by bright light surgery (BLS). Almost all cancer cells were removed using fluorescence-guided navigation without damage to the brain tissue. In contrast, brain tumors were difficult to visualize under BLS and many residual cancer cells remained in the brain after bright-light surgery.103

Human MiaPaCa-2-GFP pancreatic cancer cells were transplanted orthotopically in nude mice. BLS was performed on all tumor-bearing mice. The residual tumors were resected using a hand-held portable imaging system in mice treated with FGS. The surgical resection bed was irradiated with UVC. The average residual tumor area after FGS was significantly smaller than that after BLS only. The BLS-treated mice had significantly reduced survival compared with FGS- and FGS-UVC-treated mice for both relapse-free survival and overall survival. FGS-UVC-treated mice had increased relapse-free survival and overall survival compared with FGS-only treated mice with relapse-free survival lasting at least 150 days, indicating the animals were cured.104

New In Vivo GFP Imaging Technology

In order to image the fate of cancer-cell-derived exosomes in orthotopic nude mouse models of breast cancer, GFP was linked to CD63, which is a general marker of exosomes. Orthotopic nude-mouse models of breast cancer engineered with CD63-GFP secreted exosomes into the tumor microenvironment. These results suggested that tumor-derived exosomes may contribute to forming a niche to promote tumor growth and metastasis.105

Human 143B osteosarcoma cells expressing αv integrin-GFP were generated by transfection with an αv integrin-GFP vector. Gelfoam® (5.5 mm) was transplanted subcutaneously in transgenic RFP nude mice. The implanted Gelfoam® became highly vascularized with RFP vessels. 143B cells expressing αv integrin-GFP were injected into the vascularized Gelfoam®. Cancer cells and blood vessels were imaged in the vascularized Gelfoam® by color-coded confocal microscopy via a skin flap. Strong expression of αv integrin-GFP in 143B cells was observed near RFP vessels in the Gelfoam®.106

When the 143B αv integrin-GFP cells were orthotopically transplanted into the tibia of nude mice, the cells aligned along the collagen fibers within the tumor and had punctuate expression of αv integrin-GFP. Invading osteosarcoma cells had punctate αv integrin-GFP in the muscle tissue at the primary tumor margin.107

Using color-coded imaging, the interaction between GFP-expressing mesenchymal stromal cells and RFP-expressing 4T1 mouse mammary tumor cells was monitored. As few as five 4T1 cells could give rise to tumor formation when co-injected along with mesenchymal stromal cells into the mouse mammary fat pad, but no tumor was formed when 5 or 10 4T1 cells were implanted alone. Mesenchymal stromal cells created a vascularized environment that enhances the ability of 4T1 cells to colonize and proliferate.108

After tail vein injection of dual-color HT1080 RFP-GFP cancer cells, they could be imaged seeding and growing on the lung by open-chest assisted-ventilation imaging. The seeding and arrest of single cancer cells on the lung, accumulation of cancer-cell emboli, cancer-cell viability, and metastatic colony formation were imaged in real time by open-chest imaging.109

Dual-color imaging has also visualized RFP- and GFP-expressing blood vessels anastomosing (Figure 15).110


Fluorescent Proteins are the Method of Choice for Whole-Body Imaging

The features of fluorescent-protein-based imaging, such as a very strong and stable signal, enable noninvasive whole-body imaging down to the subcellular level,88 especially with red-shifted proteins, and make it far superior to luciferase-based imaging. Luciferase, with its very weak signal,111 precluding image acquisition and allowing only photon counting with pseudocolor-generated images, has very limited applications.112 The luciferase reporter technique requires that animals are anesthetized and restrained so that sufficient photons can be collected to construct a pseudo-image. Detection of luciferase-labeled cells in vivo is very low resolution.1 Therefore, cellular or subcellular imaging in vivo is not possible with luciferase. The dependence on circulating luciferin makes the signal from luciferase imaging unstable.112 The luciferin substrate has to reach every cancer cell to be useful and the clearance of the luciferin results in an unstable signal.113, 114 This process must be carried out in an almost light-free environment. The requirement for photon counting using luciferase precludes real-time imaging. The one possible advantage of luciferase-based imaging is that no excitation light is necessary. However, far-red absorbing proteins such as Katushka greatly reduce problems with excitation, even in deep tissues, as shown by Shcherbo et al.7 In comparison with the luciferase reporter, GFP has a much stronger signal and can therefore be used to image unrestrained animals down to the subcellular level with non-damaging blue light. The RFP signal was approximately 1000 times stronger than that of the luciferase reporter.111 Real-time images from fluorescent proteins in vivo can be captured using fairly simple apparatus and there is no need for total darkness.113

In vivo GFP images can be captured using even an LED flashlight with a proper excitation filter and an emission filter with costs as low as a few hundred dollars17 in comparison with hundreds of thousands of dollars worth of equipment necessary for luciferase imaging.

A novel fusion protein has been developed, ffLuc-cp156, which consists of a yellow variant of Aequorea GFP and firefly luciferase that has a three orders of magnitude increase in photon yields over current luciferase systems and should prove to be very useful for in vivo imaging by allowing the advantages of both types of imaging simultaneously.115

Be careful of misconceptions in the literature. For example, the following was recently published ‘Whole animal fluorescence imaging in vivo suffers from low signal-to-noise as a result of background autofluorescence, modeling-dependent photon quantification, photobleaching, low tissue penetration, and low resolution’.116 Despite enormous evidence to the contrary, as outlined above, this type of misleading misinformation continues to be published even in 2013.

GFP, RFP, and CFP transgenic nude mice appear to have a life span similar to that of non-transgenic nude mice, such that long-term tumor growth and metastasis studies can be carried out.5, 117 Thus, fluorescent proteins are not toxic to the animal (Figure 13).

Figure 13
figure 13

Transgenic RFP nude mouse. All of the major organs and tissues are red under fluorescence excitation with blue light. (a) Whole-body image of transgenic RFP nude mouse. Image was taken with a Hamamatsu C5810 tree-chip CCD camera. (b) Brain. (c) Heart and lungs. (d) Liver. (e) Circulatory system. (f) Uterus and ovary. (g) Pancreas. (h) Kidney and adrenal gland. (i) Spleen. (b–i) Images were taken with the Indec Biosystems FluorVivo imaging system.117

Non-invasive subcellular imaging88 is a significant improvement from the inserted-window models22 or abdominal imaging windows118 or of the skin flap models we have previously developed to image tumors.4, 20

Cell and tissue culture can be performed on different substrates such as on plastic, in Matrigel™, and on Gelfoam®, a sponge matrix. Each of these substrates consists of a very different surface, ranging from hard and inflexible, a gel, and a sponge-matrix, respectively. Folkman and Moscona119 found that cell shape was tightly coupled to DNA synthesis and cell growth. Therefore, the flexibility of a substrate is important for cells to maintain their optimal shape. Human osteosarcoma cells, stably expressing a fusion protein of α(v) integrin and GFP, grew as a simple monolayer without any structure formation on the surface of a plastic dish. When the osteosarcoma cells were cultured within Matrigel™, the cancer cells formed colonies but no other structures. When the cancer cells were seeded on Gelfoam®, the cells formed three-dimensional tissue-like structures. The behavior of 143B osteosarcoma cells on Gelfoam® in culture is remarkably different from those of these cells in monolayer culture or in Matrigel™. Tissue-like structures were observed only in Gelfoam® culture. A flexible structural substrate such as Gelfoam® provides a more in vivo-like culture condition than monolayer culture or Matrigel™. Matrigel™ does not result in actual three-dimensional culture (Figure 14).120

Figure 14
figure 14figure 14

Image rendering. Phase contrast fluorescence micrographs and rotating images of 143B human osteosarcoma cells expressing αv integrin fused to GFP on plastic plates (left panels); in MatrigelTM culture (middle panels); in Gelfoam® culture (right panels); using the Olympus FV1000 confocal microscope. Z-stack in 1 μm steps. The depths of images are on plastic surface 20 μm; MatrigelTM 70 μm; Gelfoam® 180 μm. The images are rotated around the z axes from 0° to 80° in five sections, using the FV-10 ASW software system.120

Figure 15
figure 15

In vivo visualization of anastomosis between RFP vessels in Gelfoam® and GFP host vessels in ND-GFP transgenic nude mice. Skin flaps were made after re-transplantation of RFP vascularized Gelfoam® into ND-GFP nude mice, previously transplanted in RFP nude mice. Fourteen days after re-transplantation, RFP-expressing vessels were observed anastomosed to ND-GFP-expressing blood vessels. At x40 magnification, a hybrid vessel with mixed expression of RFP and ND-GFP was imaged (arrow). Bar=100 μm.106

It is important to minimize autofluorescence of tissue and body fluids by using proper filters. Excitation filters should have a narrow band as close to 490 nm as possible to specifically excite GFP whose peak is distinct from that of the skin, tissues, and fluid of the animal. In addition, proper band-pass emission filters should be used with a cutoff of approximately 515 nm.6, 112, 121


  1. Hoffman RM . The multiple uses of fluorescent proteins to visualize cancer in vivo. Nat Rev Cancer 2005;5:796–806.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Zimmer M . Illuminating Disease: An Introduction to Green Fluorescent Protein. Oxford University Press: New York, 2015.

  3. Suetsugu S, Osawa Y, Nagaki M et al. Simultaneous color-coded imaging to distinguish cancer “stem-like” and non-stem cells in the same tumor. J Cell Biochem 2010;111:1035–1041.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Yang M, Li L, Jiang P et al. Dual-color fluorescence imaging distinguishes tumor cells from induced host angiogenic vessels and stromal cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2003;100:14259–14262.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Yang M, Reynoso J, Jiang P et al. Transgenic nude mouse with ubiquitous green fluorescent protein expression as a host for human tumors. Cancer Res 2004;64:8651–8656.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Hoffman RM, Yang M . Color-coded fluorescence imaging of tumor–host interactions. Nat Protoc 2006;1:928–935.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Shcherbo D, Merzlyak EM, Chepurnykh TV et al. Bright far-red fluorescent protein for whole-body imaging. Nat Methods 2007;4:741–746.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Yang M, Baranov E, Wang J-W et al. Direct external imaging of nascent cancer, tumor progression, angiogenesis, and metastasis on internal organs in the fluorescent orthotopic model. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2002;99:3824–3829.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Yamamoto N, Yang M, Jiang P et al. Real-time imaging of individual color-coded metastatic colonies in vivo. Clin Exp Metastasis 2003;20:633–638.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Brown EB, Campbell RB, Tsuzuki Y et al. In vivo measurement of gene expression, angiogenesis and physiological function in tumors using multiphoton laser scanning microscopy. Nat Med 2001;7:864–868.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Katz MH, Bouvet M, Takimoto S et al. Survival efficacy of adjuvant cytosine-analogue CS-682 in a fluorescent orthotopic model of human pancreatic cancer. Cancer Res 2004;64:1828–1833.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Sakaue-Sawano A, Kurokawa H, Morimura T et al. Visualizing spatiotemporal dynamics of multicellular cell-cycle progression. Cell 2008;132:487–498.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Verkhusha V, Lukyanov KA . The molecular properties and applications of Anthozoa fluorescent proteins and chromoproteins. Nat Biotechnol 2004;22:289–296.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Chudakov DM, Matz MV, Lukyanov S et al. Fluorescent proteins and their applications in imaging living cells and tissues. Physiol Rev 2010;90:1103–1163.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Zimmer M . Green fluorescent protein (GFP): applications, structure and related photophysical behavior. Chem Rev 2002;102:759–781.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Levenson R, Yang M, Hoffman RM . Whole-body dual-color differential fluorescence imaging of tumor angiogenesis enhanced by spectral unmixing. Proc Am Assoc Cancer Res 2004;45:46.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Yang M, Luiken G, Baranov E et al. Facile whole-body imaging of internal fluorescent tumors in mice with an LED flashlight. Biotechniques 2005;39:170–172.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Yang M, Baranov E, Jiang P et al. Whole-body optical imaging of green fluorescent protein-expressing tumors and metastases. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2000;97:1206–1211.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Hiroshma Y, Maawy A, Sato S et al. Hand-held high-resolution fluorescence imaging system for fluorescence-guided surgery of patient and cell-line pancreatic tumors growing orthotopically in nude mice. J Surg Res 2014;187:510–517.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Yamauchi K, Yang M, Jiang P et al. Development of real-time subcellular dynamic multicolor imaging of cancer cell-trafficking in live mice with a variable-magnification whole-mouse imaging system. Cancer Res 2006;66:4208–4214.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Chishima T, Miyagi Y, Wang X et al. Cancer invasion and micrometastasis visualized in live tissue by green fluorescent protein expression. Cancer Res 1997;57:2042–2047.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Jain RK, Munn LL, Fukumura D . Dissecting tumor pathopysiology using intravital microscopy. Nat Rev Cancer 2002;2:266–276.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Naumov GN, Wilson SM, MacDonald IC et al. Cellular expression of green fluorescent protein, coupled with high-resolution in vivo videomicroscopy, to monitor steps in tumor metastasis. J Cell Sci 1999;112:1835–1842.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Farina KL, Wyckoff JB, Rivera J et al. Cell motility of tumor cells visualized in living intact primary tumors using green fluorescent protein. Cancer Res 1998;58:2528–2532.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Condeelis J, Segall JE . Intravital imaging of cell movement in tumors. Nat Rev Cancer 2003;3:921–930.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Denk W, Strickler JH, Webb WW . Two-photon laser scanning fluorescence microscopy. Science 1999;248:73–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Fukumura D, Yuan F, Monsky WL et al. Effect of host microenvironment on the microcirculation of human colon adenocacinoma. Am J Pathol 1997;151:679–688.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Fukumura D, Xavier R, Sugiura T et al. Tumor induction of VEGF promoter activity in stromal cells. Cell 1998;94:715–725.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Amoh Y, Li L, Yang M et al. Hair follicle-derived blood vessels vascularize tumors in skin and are inhibited by doxorubicin. Cancer Res 2005;65:2337–2343.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Matsuzaki Y, Mabuchi Y, Okano H . Leptin receptor makes its mark on MSCs. Cell Stem Cell 2014;15:112–114.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Chishima T, Miyagi Y, Wang X et al. Metastatic patterns of lung cancer visualized live and in process by green fluorescent protein expression. Clin Exp Metastasis 1997;15:547–552.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Huang MS, Wang TJ, Liang CL et al. Establishment of fluorescent lung carcinoma metastasis model and its real-time microscopic detection in SCID mice. Clin Exp Metastasis 2002;19:359–368.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Li CY, Shan S, Huang Q et al. Initial stages of tumor cell-induced angiogenesis: evaluation via skin window chambers in rodent models. J Natl Cancer Inst 2000;92:143–147.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Moore A, Marecos E, Simonova M et al. Novel gliosarcoma cell line expressing green fluorescent protein: a model for quantitative assessment of angiogenesis. Microvasc Res 1998;56:145–153.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Al-Mehdi AB, Tozawa K, Fisher AB et al. Intravascular origin of metastasis from the proliferation of endothelium-attached tumor cells: a new model for metastasis. Nat Med 2000;6:100–102.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Wong CW, Song C, Grimes MM et al. Intravascular location of breast cancer cells after spontaneous metastasis to the lung. Am J Path 2002;161:749–753.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Zhang Q, Yang M, Shen J et al. The role of the intravascular microenvironment in spontaneous metastasis development. Intl J Cancer 2010;126:2534–2541.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Yamauchi K, Yang M, Jiang P et al. Real-time in vivo dual-color imaging of intracapillary cancer cell and nucleus deformation and migration. Cancer Res 2005;65:4246–4252.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Wolf K, te Lindert M, Krause M et al. Physical limits of cell migration: Control by ECM space and nuclear deformation and tuning by proteolysis and traction force. J Cell Biol 2013;201:1069–1084.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Suetsugu A, Jiang P, Moriwaki H et al. Imaging nuclear-cytoplasm dynamics of cancer cells in the intravascular niche of live mice. Anticancer Res 2013;33:4229–4236.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Hayashi K, Jiang P, Yamauchi K et al. Real-time imaging of tumor-cell shedding and trafficking in lymphatic channels. Cancer Res 2007;67:8223–8228.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Chang YS, di Tomaso E, McDonald DM et al. Mosaic blood vessels in tumors: frequency of cancer cells in contact with flowing blood. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2000;97:14608–14613.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Soda Y, Marumoto T, Friedmann-Morvinski D et al. Transdifferentiation of glioblastoma cells into vascular endothelial cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2011;108:4274–4280.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Hayashi K, Yamauchi K, Yamamoto N et al. A color-coded orthotopic nude-mouse treatment model of brain-metastatic paralyzing spinal cord cancer that induces angiogenesis and neurogenesis. Cell Prolif 2009;42:75–82.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Hoffman RM . Orthotopic metastatic mouse models for anticancer drug discovery and evaluation: a bridge to the clinic. Invest New Drugs 1999;17:343–359.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Harms JF, Welch DR . MDA-MB-435 human breast carcinoma metastasis to bone. Clin Exp Metastasis 2003;20:327–334.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Yang M, Hasegawa S, Jiang P et al. Widespread skeletal metastatic potential of human lung cancer revealed by green fluorescent protein expression. Cancer Res 1998;58:4217–4221.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Yang M, Jiang P, An Z et al. Genetically fluorescent melanoma bone and organ metastasis models. Clin Cancer Res 1999;5:3549–3559.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Burton DW, Geller J, Yang M et al. Monitoring of skeletal progression of prostate cancer by GFP imaging, X-ray, and serum OPG and PTHrP. Prostate 2005;62:275–281.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Yang M, Burton DW, Geller J et al. The bisphosphonate olpadronate inhibits skeletal prostate cancer progression in a green fluorescent protein nude mouse model. Clin Cancer Res 2006;12:2602–2606.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Deftos LJ, Barken I, Burton DW et al. Direct evidence that PTHrP expression promotes prostate cancer progression in bone. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2005;327:468–472.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Ongkeko WM, Burton D, Kiang A et al. Parathyroid hormone related-protein promotes epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition in prostate cancer. PLoS One 2014;9:e85803.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Peyruchaud O, Winding B, Pécheur I et al. Early detection of bone metastases in a murine model using fluorescent human breast cancer cells: application to the use of the bisphosphonate zoledronic acid in the treatment of osteolytic lesions. J Bone Miner Res 2001;16:2027–2034.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Peyruchaud O, Serre C-M, NicAmhlaoibh R et al. Angiostatin inhibits bone metastasis formation in nude mice through a direct anti-osteoclastic activity. J Biol Chem 2003;278:45826–45832.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Chishima T, Miyagi Y, Wang X et al. Visualization of the metastatic process by green fluorescent protein expression. Anticancer Res 1997;17:2377–2384.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Yang M, Jiang P, Sun FX et al. A fluorescent orthotopic bone metastasis model of human prostate cancer. Cancer Res 1999;59:781–786.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Tso CL, McBride WH, Sun J et al. Androgen deprivation induces selective outgrowth of aggressive hormone-refractory prostate cancer clones expressing distinct cellular and molecular properties not present in parental androgen-dependent cancer cells. Cancer J 2000;6:220–233.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Rashidi B, Yang M, Jiang P et al. A highly metastatic Lewis lung carcinoma orthotopic green fluorescent protein model. Clin Exp Metastasis 2000;18:57–60.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Bobek V, Plachy J, Pinterova D et al. Development of a green fluorescent protein metastatic-cancer chick-embryo drug-screen model. Clin Exp Metastasis 2004;21:347–352.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Wang XL, Xu P, Wang F et al. A new orthotopic retinoblastoma model expressing green fluorescent protein. Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi 2004;40:225–228.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Liu T, Ding Y, Xie W et al. An imageable metastatic treatment model of nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res 2007;13:3960–3967.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Kienast Y, von Baumgarten L, Fuhrmann M et al. Real-time imaging reveals the single steps of brain metastasis formation. Nat Med 2010;16:116–122.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Mukhopadhyay KD, Bandyopadhyay A, Chang TT et al. Isolation and characterization of a metastatic hybrid cell line generated by ER negative and ER positive breast cancer cells in mouse bone marrow. PLoS One 2011;6:e20473.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Momiyama M, Suetsugu A, Kimura H et al. Imaging the efficacy of UVC irradiation on superficial brain tumors and metastasis in live mice at the subcellular level. J Cell Biochem 2013;114:428–434.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Momiyama M, Suetsugu A, Chishima T et al. Subcellular real-time imaging of the efficacy of temozolomide on cancer cells in the brain of live mice. Anticancer Res 2013;33:103–106.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Momiyama M, Suetsugu A, Kimura H et al. Dynamic subcellular imaging of cancer cell mitosis in the brain of live mice. Anticancer Res 2013;33:1367–1372.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Soto MS, Serres S, Anthony DC et al. Functional role of endothelial adhesion molecules in the early stages of brain metastasis. Neuro Oncol 2014;16:540–551.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Zhao H, Cui K, Nie F et al. The effect of mTOR inhibition alone or combined with MEK inhibitors on brain metastasis: an in vivo analysis in triple-negative breast cancer models. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2012;131:425–436.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Zhao H, Jin G, Cui K et al. Novel modeling of cancer cell signaling pathways enables systematic drug repositioning for distinct breast cancer metastases. Cancer Res 2013;73:6149–6163.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Rodriguez PL, Jiang S, Fu Y et al. The proinflammatory peptide substance P promotes blood–brain barrier breaching by breast cancer cells through changes in microvascular endothelial cell tight junctions. Int J Cancer 2014;134:1034–1044.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  71. Bouvet M, Tsuji K, Yang M et al. In vivo color-coded imaging of the interaction of colon cancer cells and splenocytes in the formation of liver metastases. Cancer Res 2006;66:11293–11297.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  72. Duda DG, Duyverman AM, Kohno M et al. Malignant cells facilitate lung metastasis by bringing their own soil. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2010;107:21677–21682.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  73. Tsuji K, Yamauchi K, Yang M et al. Dual-color imaging of nuclear-cytoplasmic dynamics, viability, and proliferation of cancer cells in the portal vein area. Cancer Res 2006;66:303–306.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  74. Yamauchi K, Yang M, Hayashi K et al. Induction of cancer metastasis by cyclophosphamide pretreatment of host mice: an opposite effect of chemotherapy. Cancer Res 2008;68:516–520.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  75. Yamamoto N, Yang M, Jiang P et al. Determination of clonality of metastasis by cell-specific color-coded fluorescent-protein imaging. Cancer Res 2003;63:7785–7790.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. Glinskii AB, Smith BA, Jiang P et al. Viable circulating metastatic cells produced in orthotopic but not ectopic prostate cancer models. Cancer Res 2003;63:4239–4243.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. Glinsky GV, Glinskii AB, Berezovskaya O et al. Dual-color-coded imaging of viable circulating prostate carcinoma cells reveals genetic exchange between tumor cells in vivo, contributing to highly metastatic phenotypes. Cell Cycle 2006;5:191–197.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  78. Tome Y, Tsuchiya H, Hayashi K et al. In vivo gene transfer between interacting human osteosarcoma cell lines is associated with acquisition of enhanced metastatic potential. J Cell Biochem 2009;108:362–367.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  79. Berezovskaya O, Schimmer AD, Glinskii AB et al. Increased expression of apoptosis inhibitor protein XIAP contributes to anoikis resistance of circulating human prostate cancer metastasis precursor cells. Cancer Res 2005;65:2378–2386.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  80. Kolostova K, Pinterova D, Hoffman RM et al. Circulating human prostate cancer cells from an orthotopic mouse model rapidly captured by immunomagnetic beads and imaged by GFP expression. Anticancer Res 2011;31:1535–1539.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  81. Menen RS, Pinney E, Kolostova K et al. A rapid imageable in vivo metastasis assay for circulating tumor cells. Anticancer Res 2011;31:3125–3128.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  82. Menen R, Zhao M, Zhang L et al. Comparative chemosensitivity of circulating human prostate cancer cells and primary cancer cells. Anticancer Res 2012;32:2881–2884.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  83. Yano S, Miwa S, Mii S et al. Invading cancer cells are predominantly in G0/G1 resulting in chemoresistance demonstrated by real-time FUCCI imaging. Cell Cycle 2014;13:953–960.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  84. Yano S, Zhang Y, Miwa S et al. Spatial-temporal FUCCI imaging of each cell in a tumor demonstrates locational dependence of cell cycle dynamics and chemoresponsiveness. Cell Cycle 2014;13:2110–2119.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  85. Yano S, Tazawa H, Hashimoto Y et al. A genetically engineered oncolytic adenovirus decoys and lethally traps quiescent cancer stem-like cells into S/G2/M phases. Clin Cancer Res 2013;19:6495–6505.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  86. Yano S, Zhang Y, Zhao M et al. Tumor-targeting Salmonella typhimurium A1-R decoys quiscent cancer cells to cycle as visualized by FUCCI imaging and become sensitive to chemotherapy. Cell Cycle 2014;13:3683–3688.

    Google Scholar 

  87. Yamauchi K, Tome Y, Yamamoto N et al. Color-coded real-time subcellular fluorescence imaging of the interaction between cancer and host cells in live mice. Anticancer Res 2012;32:39–44.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  88. Yang M, Jiang P, Hoffman RM . Whole-body subcellular multicolor imaging of tumor-host interaction and drug response in real time. Cancer Res 2007;67:5195–5199.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  89. Amoh Y, Yang M, Li L et al. Nestin-linked green fluorescent protein transgenic nude mouse for imaging human tumor angiogenesis. Cancer Res 2005;65:5352–5357.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  90. Suetsugu A, Hassanein MK, Reynoso J et al. The cyan fluorescent protein nude mouse as a host for multicolor-coded imaging models of primary and metastatic tumor microenvironments. Anticancer Res 2012;32:31–38.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  91. Suetsugu A, Osawa Y, Nagaki M et al. Imaging the recruitment of cancer-associated fibroblasts by liver-metastatic colon cancer. J Cell Biochem 2011;112:949–953.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  92. Suetsugu A, Katz M, Fleming J et al. Multi-color palette of fluorescent proteins for imaging the tumor microenvironment of orthotopic tumorgraft mouse models of clinical pancreatic cancer specimens. J Cell Biochem 2012;113:2290–2295.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  93. Suetsugu A, Katz M, Fleming J et al. Imageable fluorescent metastasis resulting in transgenic GFP mice orthotopically implanted with human-patient primary pancreatic cancer specimens. Anticancer Res 2012;32:1175–1180.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  94. Suetsugu A, Katz M, Fleming J et al. Non-invasive fluorescent-protein imaging of orthotopic pancreatic-cancer-patient tumorgraft progression in nude mice. Anticancer Res 2012;32:3063–3068.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  95. Katz M, Takimoto S, Spivac D et al. A novel red fluorescent protein orthotopic pancreatic cancer model for the preclinical evaluation of chemotherapeutics. J Surg Res 2003;113:151–160.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  96. Tran Cao HS, Bouvet M, Kaushal S et al. Metronomic gemcitabine in combination with Sunitinib inhibits multisite metastasis and increases survival in an orthotopic model of pancreatic cancer. Mol Cancer Therap 2010;9:2068–2078.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  97. Kojima T, Hashimoto Y, Watanabe Y et al. A simple biological imaging system for detecting viable human circulating tumor cells. J Clin Invest 2009;119:3172–3181.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  98. Shigeyasu K, Tazawa H, Hashimoto Y et al. Fluorescence virus-guided capturing system of human colorectal circulating tumour cells for non-invasive companion diagnostics. Gut 2014, May 28. pii: gutjnl-2014-306957 doi:10.1136/gutjnl-2014-306957[Epub ahead of print].

  99. Stiles BM, Adusumilli PS, Bhargava A et al. Minimally invasive localization of oncolytic herpes simplex viral therapy of metastatic pleural cancer. Cancer Gene Ther 2006;13:53–64.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  100. Kishimoto H, Zhao M, Hayashi K et al. In vivo internal tumor illumination by telomerase-dependent adenoviral GFP for precise surgical navigation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2009;106:14514–14517.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  101. Kishimoto H, Aki R, Urata Y et al. Tumor-selective, adenoviral-mediated GFP genetic labeling of human cancer in the live mouse reports future recurrence after resection. Cell Cycle 2011;10:2737–2741.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  102. Bouvet M, Hoffman RM . Glowing tumors make for better detection and resection. Sci Transl Med 2011;3:110fs10.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  103. Momiyama M, Hiroshima Y, Suetsugu A et al. Enhanced resection of orthotopic red-fluorescent-protein-expressing human glioma by fluorescence-guided surgery in nude mice. Anticancer Res 2013;33:107–111.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  104. Hiroshima Y, Maawy A, Zhang Y et al. Fluorescence-guided surgery in combination with UVC irradiation cures metastatic human pancreatic cancer in orthotopic mouse models. PLoS One 2014;9:e99977.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  105. Suetsugu A, Honma K, Saji S et al. Imaging exosome transfer from breast cancer cells to stroma at metastatic sites in orthotopic nude mouse models. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 2013;65:383–390.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  106. Uehara F, Tome Y, Yano S et al. A color-coded imaging model of the interaction of αv integrin-GFP expressed in osteosarcoma cells and RFP expressing blood vessels in Gelfoam® vascularized in vivo. Anticancer Res 2013;33:1361–1366.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  107. Tome Y, Sugimoto N, Yano S et al. Real-time imaging of αv integrin molecular dynamics in osteosarcoma cells in vitro and in vivo. Anticancer Res 2013;33:3021–3025.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  108. Ke C-C, Liu R-S, Suetsugu A et al. In vivo fluorescence imaging reveals the promotion of mammary tumorigenesis by mesenchymal stromal cells. PLoS One 2013;8:e69658.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  109. Kimura H, Hayashi K, Yamauchi K et al. Real-time imaging of single cancer-cell dynamics of lung metastasis. J Cell Biochem 2010;109:58–64.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  110. Uehara F, Tome Y, Reynoso J et al. Color-coded imaging of spontaneous vessel anastomosis in vivo. Anticancer Res 2013;33:3041–3045.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  111. Ray P, De A, Min JJ et al. Imaging tri-fusion multimodality reporter gene expression in living subjects. Cancer Res 2004;64:1323–1330.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  112. Hoffman RM, Yang M . Whole-body imaging with fluorescent proteins. Nat Protoc 2006;1:1429–1438.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  113. Burgos JS, Rosol M, Moats RA et al. Time course of bioluminescent signal in orthotopic and heterotopic brain tumors in nude mice. Biotechniques 2003;34:1184–1188.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  114. Hoffman RM . Fluorescent proteins as visible in vivo sensors. In: Morris May C ed. Progress in Molecular Biology and Translational Science. Academic Press: Burlington, 2013;113, pp 389–402.

    Google Scholar 

  115. Hara-Miyauchi C, Tsuji O, Hanyu A et al. Bioluminescent system for dynamic imaging of cell and animal behavior. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2012;419:188–193.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  116. Kocher B, Piwnica-Worms D . lluminating cancer systems with genetically engineered mouse models and coupled luciferase reporters in vivo. Cancer Disc 2013;3:616–629.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  117. Yang M, Reynoso J, Bouvet M et al. A transgenic red fluorescent protein-expressing nude mouse for color-coded imaging of the tumor microenvironment. J Cell Biochem 2009;106:279–284.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  118. Ritsma L, Steller EJ, Beerling E et al. Intravital microscopy through an abdominal imaging window reveals a pre-micrometastasis stage during liver metastasis. Sci Transl Med 2012;4:158ra145.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  119. Folkman J, Moscona A . Role of cell shape in growth control. Nature 1978;273:345–349.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  120. Tome Y, Uehara F, Mii S et al. 3-dimensional tissue is formed from cancer cells in vitro on Gelfoam®, but not on MatrigelTM. J Cell Biochem 2014;115:1362–1367.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  121. Hoffman RM, Yang M . Subcellular imaging in the live mouse. Nat Protoc 2006;1:775–782.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


These studies were supported in part by the National Cancer Institute grants CA132971 and CA142669 and CA183280.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations


Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robert M Hoffman.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

Robert M Hoffman is an unsalaried affiliate of AntiCancer Inc.

Additional information

DEDICATION: This article is dedicated to the memory of AR Moossa, MD.

Green fluorescent protein (GFP) technology allows is a non-invasive method that allows for the visualization of cells and their components both in-vivo and in tissue culture. This review focuses on advances in utilizing this technology in cancer research such as tracking metastatic disease and determination of the efficacy of tumor therapy in murine models.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hoffman, R. Application of GFP imaging in cancer. Lab Invest 95, 432–452 (2015).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI:

Further reading


Quick links