Abstract
Antihypertensives are widely prescribed and could influence kidney stone risk by altering urinary calcium excretion. However, the impact of different classes of antihypertensives on kidney stone risk is unknown. To assess this impact, we conducted a retrospective, population-based cohort study using linked health administrative databases. Individuals aged >65 years who initiated one of the four antihypertensive classes (that is, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEis)/angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs), beta-blockers, calcium channel blockers or thiazide diuretics) were included. The participants were followed for the occurrence of a kidney stone event while maintaining continuous usage on their drug class. The association between antihypertensive class and outcome was estimated by Cox regression. Of the 542 581 people included, we observed 4533 kidney stone events (0.83%) over a median follow-up of 368 days (365–729). Compared with beta-blockers, thiazides were associated with a lower risk of kidney stones (hazard ratio (HR) 0.76; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.68–0.84), ACEis/ARBs with a borderline decreased risk (HR 0.90; 95% CI 0.83–0.98) and calcium channel blockers with a comparable risk (HR 1.02; 95% CI 0.92–1.13). When the risk of requiring an intervention for a kidney stone was examined, the results were consistent with the primary analysis; however, the protective effect of ACEis/ARBs was eliminated (HR 0.96; 95% CI 0.87–1.06). In conclusion, relative to beta-blockers, thiazide diuretics were associated with a decreased risk of kidney stone formation in adults aged >65 years, whereas ACEis/ARBs and calcium channel blockers had a comparable risk of presenting with a kidney stone.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Kidney stones are common, affecting 1 in 10 men and 1 in 20 women,1 and co-occur with many other common conditions, including chronic kidney disease, cardiovascular disease, diabetes and hypertension.2, 3, 4, 5 Antihypertensive medications are commonly prescribed to individuals with these conditions and may independently influence the risk of developing kidney stones by affecting urinary calcium excretion.
Most kidney stones are composed of calcium; consequently, hypercalciuria is the greatest risk factor for kidney stone formation.6 Several classes of antihypertensive medications can affect renal calcium handling. Thiazide diuretics reduce urinary calcium excretion and are protective against kidney stone formation.7 By contrast, calcium channel blockers increase urinary calcium excretion and may lead to a higher risk of stones.8, 9, 10 The effects of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEis) and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) are less clear, but these antihypertensives may increase urinary calcium excretion by blocking the action of angiotensin II.8, 9, 10, 11, 12 We are unaware of an effect of beta blockade on urinary calcium excretion. Whether the modification of urinary calcium excretion by different antihypertensive classes translates into a significantly increased risk of developing kidney stones is unknown.
The primary objective of our study was to determine whether initiating treatment with different classes of antihypertensive agents influences the likelihood of presenting with a kidney stone.
Methods
Population/data sources
We used linked, administrative health databases housed at the Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences in Ontario, Canada to conduct a retrospective, population-based cohort study. Ontario has a population of approximately 13.7 million people, including 2 million individuals aged >65 years who have access to a universal health-care system and provincially funded prescription drug coverage.
The data sets were linked using unique, encoded identifiers derived from health card numbers, and patient-level data were analyzed at the Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences. The vital statistics data were obtained from the Registered Persons Database. The Ontario Drug Benefits database provided prescription drug data.13 The Canadian Institute for Health Information Discharge Abstract Database (CIHI-DAD) was used to identify hospital admissions, baseline comorbidity data and emergency department visits. The reasons for the visits were captured in the CIHI National Ambulatory Care Reporting System database. Finally, physician billing claims were used to identify visits for kidney stone episodes, and other relevant episodes of care were captured from the Ontario Health Insurance Plan database. The reporting of this study followed the guidelines for observational studies (Supplementary Table S1).14
Cohort entry criteria
We identified a cohort of individuals aged ⩾66 years (to avoid an incomplete medication history), who filled a new prescription for any of the following four drug classes between 1 April 2003 and 31 March 2014: calcium channel blockers, ACEis/ARBs, beta-blockers, or thiazide diuretics. Supplementary Table S3 includes a detailed list of the drug identification numbers used. Individuals with invalid data regarding the health-care number, age, sex or death were excluded. The date of the antihypertensive prescription served as the index date. To capture new users, we excluded individuals, who received a prescription for any of these drugs in the 180 days prior to the index date. For all analyses, individuals prescribed a beta-blocker were treated as the referent category because beta-blockers are not thought to alter urinary calcium excretion. All individuals who had filled a prescription for drugs that might alter kidney stone risk in the preceding 180 days, including loop diuretics, potassium-sparing diuretics, alpha adrenergic blocking agents, centrally acting anti-adrenergics, vasodilator antihypertensive drugs, adrenergic neuron blockers, direct renin inhibitors, indinavir, topiramate, prednisone or any non-oral formulation or a combination therapy of the study drugs, were excluded. Patients with end-stage renal disease (defined as being on chronic dialysis or having received a kidney transplant) and those who had a hospital admission in the previous 90 days prior to the index date were also excluded.
Baseline covariates
Demographic information, including age and sex, was obtained from the Registered Persons Database, and socioeconomic status was determined based on the neighborhood income quintile according to Statistics Canada. We used a 5-year look-back window to identify important baseline comorbidities, including alcoholism, chronic liver disease, dementia, heart failure, history of kidney stones, human immunodeficiency virus, hypercalcemia, hyperparathyroidism, hypertension, inflammatory bowel disease, leukemia, peripheral vascular disease and stroke/transient ischemic attack. We used 3 years of prior CIHI-DAD hospitalization data to calculate the Charlson comorbidity index. The Charlson comorbidity index was calculated based on the adaptation by Quan et al.15 Codes were used to ascertain exposures, and the covariates are detailed in Supplementary Tables S3 and S4. The baseline demographic, comorbidity and treatment information was reported according to the first class of antihypertensive agent prescribed.
Identification of kidney stone events
Our primary outcome was the first presentation with a kidney stone to a primary care physician or emergency department or an admission to a hospital following the index antihypertensive prescription. These outcomes were captured using the Ontario Health Insurance Plan, CIHI-DAD and National Ambulatory Care Reporting System databases via a validated algorithm2, 3, 16 based on the International Classification of Diseases (ICD), Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) diagnostic codes and the Tenth Revision (ICD-10-CA) diagnostic codes. A more specific outcome definition of kidney stones requiring surgery was evaluated in a secondary analysis. Refer to Supplementary Table S2 for a complete list of the diagnostic codes used to identify our primary outcome of interest.
Statistical analysis
Variables were complete with no missing values except for income quintile (0.3% missing) and rural residence (<0.1% missing). Standardized differences were used to assess the balance in baseline variables between the groups, with a standardized difference of >10% being considered potentially important.17
Patients were followed up from the time of the index prescription until the occurrence of the primary outcome, death, a prescription for a different study antihypertensive (that is, switch to prevent a carry-over effect), no subsequent prescription refill (stop) or the end of the study follow-up period (31 March 2015). To be defined as continually using the study drug, an individual was required to have a subsequent prescription refill for the same index drug class within 1.5 times the days supplied of their previous prescription.18 Individuals were censored 365 days after their last prescription refill in order to allow time for a stone formed to become clinically apparent.
We used Cox proportional hazards regression with beta-blockers as the referent group to model the unadjusted hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence limits of a kidney stone event according to the class of antihypertensive prescribed. The models were adjusted for the following factors defined a priori: age (per 1 year), sex (male referent), number of primary care provider visits in the prior year (per one visit), and Charlson comorbidity score (per one unit increase) as well as history of stroke, diabetes, hypertension, hypercalcemia, hyperparathyroidism, kidney stones and inflammatory bowel disease. Please refer to Supplementary Table S4 for the specific codes.
Several sensitivity analyses were performed. First, we restricted the outcome definition to a kidney stone requiring surgical intervention. Second, calcium channel blockers were classified as either dihydropyridine or non-dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers based on their mechanism of action and their potential effect on urinary calcium excretion and were analyzed as two separate groups in an additional analysis. Finally, in subgroup analyses using interaction terms, we evaluated whether the presence or absence of a history of kidney stones, diabetes or hypertension in the preceding 5 years modified the relationship between the antihypertensive class and the risk of kidney stones.
We conducted all analyses using SAS version 9.4 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA, 2011) according to a prespecified protocol that was approved by the Institutional Review Board at Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre (Toronto, Ontario, Canada). Participant informed consent was not required for this study. Two-sided P-values <0.05 were considered significant.
Results
Characteristics of the cohort
A total of 2 004 789 patients filled a prescription for an antihypertensive drug during the accrual period. After the exclusions were applied, 542 581 patients met our criteria for cohort entry (Figure 1). A total of 255 120 (47%) patients had a prescription for an ACEi or an ARB; 85 650 (16%) patients received a calcium channel blocker; 105 493 (19%) patients received a thiazide diuretic; and 96 318 (18%) patients received a beta-blocker. The median follow-up time for the entire cohort was 368 days (365–729). The median follow-up time was 401 days (interquartile range (IQR): 365–888) for patients who were prescribed an ACEi or an ARB and 365 days for patients who received a beta-blocker (IQR: 349–576), calcium channel blocker (IQR: 260–685) or thiazide diuretic (IQR: 248–570). The baseline characteristics are presented in Table 1 according to the antihypertensive drug class. The groups were well balanced. Individuals prescribed a beta-blocker had a history of more visits to their primary care physicians, and those prescribed thiazide diuretics tended to have lower Charlson comorbidity scores and fewer baseline medications relative to those prescribed beta-blockers. There were more females prescribed a thiazide, and more individuals with diabetes mellitus received an ACEi/ARB relative to beta-blockers. The reasons for censoring are shown in Supplementary Table S5.
Relationship between the type of antihypertensive prescribed and kidney stone events
Overall, 0.83% of the cohort (4533 patients) experienced a kidney stone episode following a new antihypertensive prescription. The median time to event was 375 days (IQR: 147–910) for patients prescribed an ACEi or an ARB, 307 days (IQR; 136–714) for patients prescribed a beta-blocker, 300 days (IQR: 100–710) for patients prescribed a calcium channel blocker and 281 days (IQR: 107–606) for patients prescribed a thiazide diuretic. Using beta-blockers as the referent group, we examined the risk of a kidney stone event based on the antihypertensive drug class (Table 2). Of those prescribed a beta-blocker, 795 (5.3 per 1000 person-years) experienced a kidney stone episode. Of those prescribed an ACEi or an ARB, 2500 (4.8 per 1000 person-years) had an event (HRadjusted 0.90; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.83–0.98, P=0.01). Of those prescribed a calcium channel blocker, 699 (4.8 per 1000 person-years) had a stone episode (HRadjusted 1.02; 95% CI: 0.92–1.13, P=0.76) and 539 (3.3 per thousand person-years) of those receiving a thiazide had an event (HRadjusted 0.76; 95% CI: 0.68–0.84, P<0.01) (Table 2).
Sensitivity analyses
The lack of an altered risk in the calcium channel blocker group persisted in a sensitivity analysis examining the risk of presenting with a kidney stone requiring surgical intervention (HRadjusted 1.10; 95% CI: 0.97–1.25, P=0.12). This stricter, more specific definition attenuated the significantly decreased risk of kidney stones in patients receiving an ACEi/ARB (HRadjusted 0.96; 95% CI: 0.87–1.06, P=0.42). However, the protective association of thiazides was retained (HRadjusted 0.76; 95% CI: 0.67–0.88, P<0.01) (Table 3).
The risk of a kidney stone event did not vary according to the subclass of calcium channel blocker prescribed (Supplementary Table S6). A history of a prior kidney stone did not modify the effect of antihypertensive class on the occurrence of a subsequent stone (P-value for interaction=0.30, Table 4) and neither did diabetes (P-value for interaction=0.66) or hypertension (P-value for interaction=0.27). Finally, the exclusion of patients with hypercalcemia and hyperparathyroidism did not significantly alter the results.
Discussion
We examined the risk of presenting with a kidney stone in elderly patients treated with different classes of antihypertensive agents. New thiazide diuretic prescriptions were associated with a decreased risk relative to beta-blockers. Although ACEi/ARBs had a slight protective effect in the primary analysis, this effect did not persist when the stricter outcome of kidney stone surgery was used. Calcium channel blockers did not confer an altered risk of developing kidneys stones relative to beta-blockers in either analysis. Given the widespread long-term use of antihypertensive medications, these results are reassuring.
Kidney stones and hypertension are both common, and individuals who experience a kidney stone are more likely to have hypertension.3, 4 Furthermore, the administration of calcium channel blockers causes both natriuresis and calciuria.8, 9, 10 Although the chronic administration of either Quinapril or Enalapril did not cause hypercalciruia,19 angiotensin induces hypocalciuria,11, 12 suggesting that this inhibition could raise urinary calcium excretion. It is therefore biologically plausible that the increased urinary calcium excretion induced by the calcium channel blockers or ACEi/ARBs could confer an increased risk of kidney stone formation in persons receiving these drugs. Moreover, ACE signaling has been implicated in bone remodeling after injury.20 These associations led us to examine the relative risk of stone formation by antihypertensive drug class prescription. In this large cohort of older persons (>65 years of age), we were unable to find an increased risk of kidney stones in those receiving a new prescription for either ACEi/ARBs or calcium channel blockers. We are unaware of any other studies examining kidney stone risk in persons receiving these classes of drugs.
Thiazide diuretics induce hypocalciuria, and multiple studies, including a large meta-analysis, support their clinical utility in reducing the risk of kidney stone formation.21 Most kidney stones are composed of calcium (calcium oxalate or calcium phosphate), and drugs that reduce urinary calcium excretion decrease the risk of kidney stone formation. It should also be considered that renal calculi can take significant time to form.22 Given our relatively short follow-up of approximately 1 year, we must consider the possibility that thiazides have a stabilizing effect, preventing stones from passing and, therefore, becoming clinically significant. Overall, our results support this notion and the utility of thiazides in preventing kidney stones.
Our results have potential implications for the delivery of health care and, in particular, the choice of antihypertensive agents. First, our study is consistent with previous studies suggesting that the use of thiazide diuretics is associated with a reduced risk of kidney stones.7 However, the other classes of antihypertensives, despite their potential effects on urinary calcium excretion, do not appear to confer an altered risk of kidney stone formation. Thus the choice of antihypertensive should consider the potential cardiovascular or renal benefits of these therapies rather than the kidney stone risk when tailoring therapy to an individual patient.
Our study has several limitations. Our outcome relied on patients presenting to physicians for care of a kidney stone; therefore, asymptomatic kidney stones were not detected. Although we adjusted for multiple potential confounders, we were not able to adjust for some factors potentially affecting kidney stone formation, such as dietary factors, the occurrence of primary or secondary hypertension, the degree of blood pressure lowering, over-the-counter medications such as calcium and vitamin D and body mass index. Furthermore, individuals were not randomly assigned to the treatment groups. Thus the risk of residual confounding remains. In addition, as our cohort only included individuals aged >65 years, a confirmation of our results in younger patients is required. The need to censor when another study drug was administered to prevent contamination is also a limitation because the study drug may induce the development of a kidney stone, which may not present clinically for years to come. Despite these limitations, with the strict restriction of the outcomes to patients receiving a single study drug, we were still able to observe differences in the risk conferred by thiazide diuretics.
In conclusion, we found a decreased risk of kidney stones in adults aged >65 years who were prescribed a thiazide diuretic relative to beta-blockers. However, the new prescription of a calcium channel blocker or ACEi/ARB was not associated with an altered risk of kidney stone formation relative to beta-blockers. Given the number of individuals with kidney stones and hypertension, the lack of an increased risk of a clinically significant kidney stone episode in persons receiving a new prescription for ACEi/ARBs or calcium channel blockers is reassuring.
References
Scales CD Jr, Smith AC, Hanley JM, Saigal CS, Urologic diseases in America Project. Prevalence of kidney stones in the United States. Eur Urol 2012; 62: 160–165.
Alexander RT, Hemmelgarn BR, Wiebe N, Bello A, Morgan C, Samuel S, Klarenbach SW, Curhan GC, Tonelli M . Kidney stones and kidney function loss: a cohort study. BMJ 2012; 345: e5287.
Alexander RT, Hemmelgarn BR, Wiebe N, Bello A, Samuel S, Klarenbach SW, Curhan GC, Tonelli M, for the Alberta Kidney Disease Network. Kidney stones and cardiovascular events: a cohort study. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2013; 9: 506–512.
Ferraro PM, Taylor EN, Eisner BH, Gambaro G, Rimm EB, Mukamal KJ, Curhan GC . History of kidney stones and the risk of coronary heart disease. JAMA 2013; 310: 408–415.
Taylor EN, Stampfer MJ, Curhan GC . Diabetes mellitus and the risk of nephrolithiasis. Kidney Int 2005; 68: 1230–1235.
Levy FL, Adams-Huet B, Pak CY . Ambulatory evaluation of nephrolithiasis: an update of a 1980 protocol. Am J Med 1995; 98: 50–59.
Escribano J, Balaguer A, Pagone F, Feliu A, Roque IFM . Pharmacological interventions for preventing complications in idiopathic hypercalciuria. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2009, CD004754.
Brown B, Churchill P . Renal effects of methoxyverapamil in anesthetized rats. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 1983; 225: 372–377.
Dietz JR, Davis JO, Freeman RH, Villarreal D, Echtenkamp SF . Effects of intrarenal infusion of calcium entry blockers in anesthetized dogs. Hypertension 1983; 5: 482–488.
Schmitz A . Acute renal effects of oral felodipine in normal man. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 1987; 32: 17–22.
Charbonneau A, Leclerc M, Brunette MG . Effect of angiotensin II on calcium reabsorption by the luminal membranes of the nephron. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 2001; 280: E928–E936.
Lima MC, Ajzen HA, Ribeiro AB, Andrade U, Ramos OL . Effect of angiotensin II on urinary magnesium, calcium, and sodium excretion in normal subjects. Am J Med Sci 1972; 263: 173–179.
Levy AR, O'Brien BJ, Sellors C, Grootendorst P, Willison D . Coding accuracy of administrative drug claims in the Ontario Drug Benefit database. Can J Clin Pharmacol 2003; 10: 67–71.
Benchimol EI, Langan S, Guttmann A, RECORD Steering Committee. Call to RECORD: the need for complete reporting of research using routinely collected health data. J Clin Epidemiol 2013; 66: 703–705.
Quan H, Sundararajan V, Halfon P, Fong A, Burnand B, Luthi JC, Saunders LD, Beck CA, Feasby TE, Ghali WA . Coding algorithms for defining comorbidities in ICD-9-CM and ICD-10 administrative data. Med Care 2005; 43: 1130–1139.
Rule AD, Bergstralh EJ, Melton LJ 3rd, Li X, Weaver AL, Lieske JC . Kidney stones and the risk for chronic kidney disease. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2009; 4: 804–811.
Austin PC . Using the standardized difference to compare the prevalence of a binary variable between two groups in observational research. Commun Stat Simul Comput 2009; 38: 1228–1234.
Carter AA, Gomes T, Camacho X, Juurlink DN, Shah BR, Mamdani MM . Risk of incident diabetes among patients treated with statins: population based study. BMJ 2013; 346: f2610.
Perez-Castrillon JL, Silva J, Justo I, Sanz A, Martin-Luquero M, Igea R, Escudero P, Pueyo C, Diaz C, Hernandez G, Duenas A . Effect of quinapril, quinapril-hydrochlorothiazide, and enalapril on the bone mass of hypertensive subjects: relationship with angiotensin converting enzyme polymorphisms. Am J Hypertens 2003; 16: 453–459.
Kawahata H, Sotobayashi D, Aoki M, Shimizu H, Nakagami H, Ogihara T, Morishita R . Continuous infusion of angiotensin II modulates hypertrophic differentiation and apoptosis of chondrocytes in cartilage formation in a fracture model mouse. Hypertens Res 2015; 38: 382–393.
Seitz H, Jaworski ZF . Effect of hydrochlorothiazide on serum and urinary calcium and urinary citrate. Can Med Assoc J 1964; 90: 414–420.
Trinchieri A, Ostini F, Nespoli R, Rovera F, Montanari E, Zanetti G . A prospective study of recurrence rate and risk factors for recurrence after a first renal stone. J Urol 1999; 162: 27–30.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by a Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) operating grant (MOP no. 136891) to RTA and the Stollery Children’s Hospital Foundation through the Women and Children’s Health Research Institute and the Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences Kidney, Dialysis and Transplantation (ICES KDT) Program. RTA is an Alberta Innovates Health Solutions (AIHS) Clinical Scholar. AXG was supported by the Dr Adam Linton Chair in Kidney Health Analytics. This study was supported by the ICES Western site. ICES is a non-profit research corporation funded by an annual grant from the Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care (MOHLTC). Core funding for the ICES Western is provided by the Academic Medical Organization of Southwestern Ontario (AMOSO), the Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry (SSMD), Western University and the Lawson Health Research Institute (LHRI). The analysis was conducted by members of the ICES KDT team at the ICES Western facility, who are supported by a grant from CIHR. The study design, opinions, results and conclusions reported in this paper are those of the authors and are independent of the funding sources. No endorsement of ICES, AMOSO, SSMD, LHRI, CIHR or the MOHLTC is intended or should be inferred. Parts of this material are based on data and information compiled and provided by CIHI. However, the analyses, conclusions, opinions and statements expressed herein are those of the authors and not necessarily those of CIHI. We also thank IMS Brogan for the use of their Drug Information Database.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Supplementary Information accompanies the paper on Hypertension Research website
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Alexander, R., McArthur, E., Jandoc, R. et al. Antihypertensive medications and the risk of kidney stones in older adults: a retrospective cohort study. Hypertens Res 40, 837–842 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/hr.2017.42
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/hr.2017.42
Keywords
This article is cited by
-
Antihypertensive medication and risk of kidney stones: a Canadian wake-up call
Hypertension Research (2017)