Protective effect of vascular endothelial growth factor/vascular permeability factor 165 and 121 on glomerular endothelial cell injury in the rat

Abstract

Vascular endothelial growth factor/vascular permeability factor (VEGF/VPF) promotes the repair of injured vessels by stimulating angiogenesis. VEGF/VPF reportedly has cytoprotective activity but no study has shown the protective effect of VEGF/VPF on glomerular endothelial cells. We examined whether recombinant VEGF/VPF121 and VEGF/VPF165 isoforms could prevent injury of glomerular endothelial cells. Mild glomerular injury was induced in rats by an intravenous-injection of a limited dose of anti-Thy-1.1 antibody to obtain lesions similar to those found in the human disease. Recombinant VEGF/VPF165, VEGF/VPF121 or BSA was administered 4 h before the injection of the antibody, and once daily for 3 days. In the BSA-injected rats, mesangial cell lysis and endothelial cell injury in dilated capillary tufts were evident without endothelial cell apoptosis on days 1–4. Thereafter, cell proliferation and repair began and remodeling of the glomeruli was completed by day 28. Macrophages but not polymorphonuclear leukocytes accumulated significantly in the glomeruli on days 1–4. Treatment with VEGF/VPF isoform protected endothelial cells but not mesangial cells from destruction on day 1, and accelerated the repair of both types of cells, which was completed by day 18, 10 days earlier than that of the control animals. The results indicate that VEGF/VPF121 or VEGF/VPF165 can protect glomerular endothelial cells against injury, independent of apoptosis-inhibition activity, thereby promoting reconstruction of glomeruli. The protective effect of VEGF/VPF on endothelial cells suggests that it could provide therapeutic benefit for certain kidney diseases.

Main

Vascular endothelial growth factor/vascular permeability factor (VEGF/VPF) mediates angiogenesis and vasculogenesis, and regulates vascular permeability.1 There are six VEGF isoforms in human beings, VEGF/VPF121, 145, 165, 183, 189 and 206,1 and at least three isoforms in mice, VEGF/VPF120, 164 and 188.2 The isoforms have different affinities for VEGF/VPF receptors,3, 4 heparan sulfate5 and coreceptor, neuropilin-1,6 and they are expressed at different levels in different tissues in both embryos and adults.2 In human glioma cells, there was a difference in angiogenesis induced by overexpression of each isoform.7 Glioma cells show increased vascular density in intracranial space by overexpressing either VEGF/VPF165 or VEGF/VPF189 but not VEGF/VPF121. Mice expressing only VEGF/VPF120 showed impaired cardiac8 and renal angiogenesis.9 Thus, it is likely that VEGF/VPF isoforms have distinct activities.

In the kidney, glomerular endothelial cells are continuously exposed to high blood pressure for blood filtration, and are continuously destroyed and regenerated physiologically.10 When the endothelial cells are severely injured, defective repair leads to glomerular sclerosis.11 Under such conditions, endothelial cells rely on various protective mechanisms to survive. One well-known strategy involves VEGF/VPF signaling.12, 13, 14, 15, 16 Although the angiogenic effect of VEGF/VPF165 has been studied during the repair of glomerular injury,17, 18 glomerulonephritis models used in these studies show excessive glomerular destruction, which differs greatly from the changes observed in human disease. It was reported recently that VEGF/VPF plays a so-called nonangiogenic role19 to protect endothelial cells,20, 21 neural cells22 and the liver23 against injury. It is important to study the VEGF/VPF effect on glome-rular endothelial cells and the mechanism in a biologically relevant model.

Therefore, we induced relatively mild glomerular injury by injecting a limited dose of Thy-1.1 antibody into rats to obtain endothelial cell changes similar to those seen in human mesangial proliferative glomerulonephritis. We then examined the protective effect of recombinant VEGF/VPF165 and VEGF/VPF121 on the glomerular changes.

Materials and methods

Animals

Approval for animal studies was obtained from the Ethics Committee for animal experiments in Kumamoto University. Male 6-week-old Wistar rats, weighing about 160 g, were used for these studies.

Induction of Mesangial Proliferative Glomerulonephritis

Glomerulonephritis was induced in rats by injecting a mouse monoclonal antibody to Thy-1.1, as a purified IgG (MCA47G, Serotec Ltd, Oxford, England), into jugular veins through indwelling catheters (day 0). The amounts of the antibody varied from 0.06 to 0.25 mg per animal and the induction of glomerular changes initiated by mesangiolysis was assessed. The severity of glomerular changes depended on the dose of injected anti-Thy-1.1 antibody, which was between 0.06 and 0.25 mg. Glomerulonephritis induced by injecting 0.20 mg of the antibody caused severe mesangiolysis and capillary rupture (ballooning) in the glomerulus, which may be too severe to simulate histological changes in human mesangial proliferative glomerulonephritis. On the other hand, 0.12 mg of the antibody induced milder but significant glomerular changes, and we selected this dose to induce glomerulonephritis in this study.

Treatment Protocol

Since the administered anti-Thy-1.1 antibody remains detectable in glomeruli for 3 days,24 recombinant VEGF/VPF165 was administered for three consecutive days after the initial anti-Thy-1.1 injection to counteract the nephritogenic activity of the antibody. An amount of 10 μg of recombinant VEGF/VPF165 (Pepro Tech EC Ltd, London, England) or 8 μg of recombinant VEGF/VPF121 (TOAGOSEI CO Ltd, Tsukuba, Japan) was dissolved in 0.1 ml of saline and administered into the jugular vein of the animal through the catheter 4 h before injecting the anti-Thy-1.1 antibody. For experiments with VEGF/VPF165, 10 μg of the protein per dose was additionally administered 1 (day 1), 2 (day 2) and 3 days (day 3) after injecting the antibody. As a control, the same amount of BSA on a molar concentration (Sigma Chemical Co., St Louis, MO, USA) was administered instead of VEGF/VPF. Kidneys were harvested under anesthesia on days 1, 4, 18 and 28, and submitted for histological examination. The same animal was used to harvest one kidney on day 4 and the other on day 18. For experiments with VEGF/VPF121, there were no additional injections and the kidneys were harvested on day 1. Experiments were repeated three times independently for VEGF/VPF165 and VEGF/VPF121.

Histological Assessment

Routine histological observation and immunohistochemistry

Renal tissues were embedded in the OCT compound and rapidly frozen in liquid nitrogen, or were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde in phosphate buffer and embedded in paraffin. Paraffin sections of 4 μm thickness were stained with either hematoxylin and eosin (HE), periodic acid-Schiff (PAS) or Azan–Mallory. Immunohistochemistry for vWF and proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) was performed on frozen sections, and staining with RM-4,25 that specifically recognizes rat macrophage/dendritic cells, was performed on paraffin sections. Frozen sections of 8 μm thickness were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde and 0.05% glutaraldehyde in 0.1 M phosphate buffer at room temperature for 10 min, followed by incubation with 0.001% pepsin in 0.01 N HCl at 37°C for 5 min for antigen unmasking or retrieval. Paraffin sections of 6 μm thickness were preincubated with 0.1% trypsin (Sigma) in 50 mM Tris-HCl buffer (pH 7.6) at 37°C for 15 min to unmask antigen. Intrinsic peroxidase activity was blocked by treating tissues with 1% H2O2/methanol at room temperature for 20 min. Sections were incubated overnight at 4°C with mouse monoclonal anti-PCNA antibody, rabbit anti-human vWF polyclonal antibody, or mouse monoclonal antibody RM-4, followed by DAKO Envision™ PO or AP sys-tem. Bound antibody was visualized by peroxidase reaction in a 3,3′-diaminobenzoic tetrahydrochlo-ride (DAB) (brown) and H2O2 solution, or by alkaline phosphatase reaction for Fuchsin (DAKO Corp., Carpinteria, CA, USA) (red).

For morphometrical studies, more than 30 cross-sections of glomeruli were examined sequentially in each kidney sample.

Confocal Microscopy

For detailed observation of PCNA-positive endothelial cells in glomeruli, confocal microscopic analysis was also performed. Frozen sections of 8 μm thickness were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde and 0.05% glutaraldehyde in 0.1 M phosphate buffer at room temperature for 10 min, followed by an incubation with 0.001% pepsin in 0.01 N HCl at 37°C for 5 min, for unmasking or antigen retrieval. Sections were incubated overnight at 4°C with anti-PCNA mouse monoclonal antibody and anti-human vWF rabbit polyclonal antibody at a final dilution of 1:100 and 1:10 000, respectively. Next, tissue sections were incubated with goat anti-rabbit-Alexa488 antibody (Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR, USA) and goat anti-mouse-Alexa546 antibody (Molecular Probes) at a final dilution of 1:100. The images were collected on a microscope (model IX70; Olympus) attached to a confocal laser scanning device (model Fluoview FV500; Olympus, Tokyo, Japan). The laser lines were 488 nm (Alexa488) and 543 nm (Alexa546).

Counts of nuclei and tufts

The number of nuclei was regarded as the number of cells. The degree of mesangiolysis was determined by the decrease in glomerular cell numbers. The number of nuclei on day 1 was counted in 25 glomeruli at their equatorial sections on HE-stained slides from six kidney samples. Each value was divided by its corresponding glomerular area to compute a relative number of nuclei per glomerulus. The number of tufts on day 1 was also counted in 25 glomeruli from six kidney samples at their equatorial sections on Azan–Mallory-stained slides and a relative number of tufts per glomerulus was similarly determined. Countings were performed by three observers independently and the average values were used as data.

VEGF/VPF Measurement

Serum samples were stored at −80°C until use and submitted to colorimetric enzyme immunoassay to quantitate VEGF/VPF.

Mesangial proliferation

On PAS-stained sections, 24 glomeruli from three kidney samples were observed at their equatorial sections at each time point by three observers. The degree of mesangial proliferation was scored as follows: expanded mesangial areas in ≤25, 26–50, 51–75 and 76–100% of the total glomerular area were scored as 0, 1, 2 and 3, respectively.

Endothelial cells

Tissues were made to reacted with anti-human vWF polyclonal antibody (DAKO Corp.), at a final dilution of 1:20 000, followed by DAKO Envision™ PO system, to identify endothelial cells immunohistochemically. The percentage of vWF-positive brown-colored area in glomerulus at its equatorial section was calculated by computer-assisted image analysis using the Mac Scope software (Mitani Corp., Fukui, Japan) in 15 glomeruli from each of three kidney samples per time point.

Proliferating cells

Proliferating cells in the tissue were stained immunohistochemically using an antibody to proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) (DAKO Corp.) at a final dilution of 1:200, followed by the DAKO Envision™ AP system. The number of PCNA-positive cells was counted in 30 glomeruli at their equatorial sections in three kidney samples per time point by three observers independently. Each value was expressed as a relative number of proliferating cells per glomerulus. Double staining for vWF and PCNA was also performed.

Polymorphonuclear leukocytes (PMN) and macrophages

PMN were identified morphologically and counted in 15 HE-stained glomeruli at their equatorial sections in three kidney tissues from three independent experiments at each time point by three observers independently. Macrophage/dendritic cells were stained immunohistochemically using a monoclonal antibody RM-4, at a final concentration of 10 μg/ml, followed by the DAKO Envision™ PO system. RM-4-positive cells were counted in 18 glomeruli at their equatorial sections in the three kidney samples from three independent experiments per time point by three observers independently. Each value was expressed as a relative number of the cells per glomerulus.

Apoptotic endothelial cells

Apoptotic endothelial cells were detected by TUNEL method using an apoptosis detection kit (ApopTag; Serologicals Corp., Norcross, GA, USA) followed by immunostaining for RECA-1 (SANBIO BV, Uden, Netherlands). Briefly, 4 μm paraffin-embedded sections were deparaffinized, rehydrated, and treated with proteinase K (20 mg/ml) for 15 min. Intrinsic peroxidase activity was blocked with 3% H2O2 in PBS for 5 min at room temperature. Sections were incubated in a terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase reaction mixture containing digoxigenin-dNTP for 1 h at 37°C, followed by treatment with antidigoxigenin peroxidase conjugate for 30 min at room temperature. Apoptosis was visualized with peroxidase reaction for DAB with NiCl2, CoCl2 and H2O2 solution (black). The sections were then incubated with anti-RECA-1 at a final dilution of 1:50, followed by detection using the Envision™ AP system (DAKO Corp.). Immunoactivity was visualized by alkaline phosphatase reaction for Fuchsin (red) (DAKO Corp.).

Electron Microscopy Studies

For electron microscopic observations, on day 1 small blocks of fresh kidney were fixed with 2.5% glutaraldehyde for 1 h, washed with 0.1 mol/l cacodylate buffer (pH 7.4), and fixed further with 1% osmium tetroxide for 1 h. Then the samples were dehydrated through a graded series of ethanol, and embedded in epoxy resin. Ultrathin sections were examined by an electron microscope (Hitachi H-7500, Tokyo, Japan), with counter staining by uranyl acetate and lead citrate.

Assessment of renal function

Creatinine concentrations in serum or urine samples were measured using an autoanalyzer, and urinary protein was measured by a pyrogallol red method. The degree of proteinuria was evaluated by the ratio of urinary protein to urinary creatinine.

Western Blotting

Renal cortical tissues were homogenized by sonication in lysis buffer containing 0.5% Triton X-100, 0.15 M NaCl, 10 mM HEPES, 0.1 mg/ml aprotinin, 0.1 mg/ml leupeptin and 1mM phenylmethanesulfonyl fluoride. Homogenates were mixed by rotation for 2 h at 4°C to extract membrane proteins and were centrifuged at 15 000 r.p.m. for 30 min at 4°C to get supernatants. The supernatants containing the same amount of proteins were electrophoresed on a 7.5% sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel, and blotted to a membrane. Flk-1 was immunologically detected with a specific polyclonal antibody (SC-504, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA, USA).

Statistics

All data were reported as mean±standard deviation. Data were analyzed by ANOVA.

Results

Effects of VEGF/VPF Treatment on the Course of Glomerulonephritis

After injection of anti-Thy-1.1 antibody, mesangiolysis was observed and capillary tuft fusions appeared on day 1 (Figure 1b) and these glomerular injuries were more evident on day 4 (Figure 1c). Thereafter, the repair process began and mesangial cell proliferation with an increased matrix was clearly evident on day 18 (Figure 1d). By day 28, remodeling of injured glomeruli was completed and glomerular cellularity, mesangial expansion and tuft shapes were similar to those observed before anti-Thy-1.1 antibody injection (Figure 1e). Ballooning caused by severe capillary injury in glomeruli was scarcely seen throughout the course of the disease. On observation by electron microscopy, on day 1, glomerular capillary tufts were expanded, ruptured and fused to each other (Figure 2a): no apoptotic endothelial cells were observed (Figure 2c). Administration of VEGF/VPF165 reduced the glomerular capillary damage but mesangiolysis was still present on day 1 (Figure 1f). On day 4, mesangial cell proliferation was already evident (Figure 1g). Thereafter, mesangial proliferation was attenuated and on day 18 the glomerular structure was similar to that before anti-Thy-1.1 antibody injection (Figure 1h). On observation by electron microscopy, on day 1, capillary tufts were protected from rupture by VEGF/VPF121 treatment (Figure 2b). Similar ultrastructural changes were observed with VEGF/VPF165 treatment (data not shown). Accumulation of PMN in the glomeruli was negligible through the course of glomerulonephritis (Figure 3a). In control and VEGF/VPF165-treated glomerulonephritis, RM-4(+) macrophage accumulation in the glomeruli was evident on days 1 and 4 (Figure 3b). On day 1, more macrophages had accumulated in the glomeruli of the VEGF/VPF-treated animals than in the untreated controls.

Figure 1
figure1

Histological changes along the course of glomerulonephritis in the control (ae) and the VEGF/VPF-treated (fh) animals. Representative glomeruli are shown before antibody injection (a), on day 1 (b, f), on day 4 (c, g), on day 18 (d, h) and on day 28 (e). A representative tuft fusion is indicated by the arrow in (b). Many tuft fusions are evident in (c). (a, c, d, e, g, h) PAS staining. (b, f) Azan–Mallory staining (magnification × 200).

Figure 2
figure2

Ultrastructure (a, b) and TUNEL staining (c) of glomeruli on day 1 of glomerulonephritis. (a) A representative glomerulus of the control animal. Mesangiolysis and fusion of tufts (*) by rupture of endothelial cells (En) are shown. The arrowhead shows an apoptotic cell. (b) A representative glomerulus of the VEGF/VPF-treated animals. Although mesangiolysis (M) is evident, endothelial cells (En) are not ruptured. Bars represent 2 μm. (c) Double staining of the tissue of control glomerulonephritis. Endothelial cells are stained by anti-RECA-1 antibody (red) and an apoptotic cell, shown by the arrow, is stained by TUNEL (black). No apoptotic endothelial cells are found in the glomeruli (magnification × 100).

Figure 3
figure3

PMN (a) and macrophage (b) accumulations in the glomeruli of animals with BSA or VEGF/VPF165 treatment. *P<0.05, **P<0.01.

Effect of VEGF/VPF Treatment on Glomerular Changes on Day 1

Mesangiolysis

On day 1, the number of cells per glomerulus was decreased and neither VEGF/VPF165 nor VEGF/VPF121 treatment was significantly protective (Figure 4a, b). Subtracting the sum of PMN and macrophage counts from the total nuclear counts did not alter this result.

Figure 4
figure4

Protective effect of VEGF/VPF165 and VEGF/VPF121 on mesangial cell and endothelial cell injury during glomerulonephritis. Recombinant VEGF/VPF165 (a, c) or VEGF/VPF121 (b, d) was administered before injecting the anti-Thy-1.1 antibody, and number of nuclei (a, b) and number of tufts (c, d) per glomerular area on day 1 are shown. As a control, BSA was injected instead of VEGF/VPF. The number of nuclei and the number of tufts in glomeruli before the anti-Thy-1.1 antibody injection were used for normalization. Each experiment was repeated three times independently. **P<0.01.

Capillary injury

Since capillary tufts are supported by the mesangium, mesangiolysis results in dilation or fusion of capillary tufts and a decrease of the tuft number in the glomerulus. In the control group, the tuft number decreased (Figure 4c). In the VEGF/VPF165-treated animals, the decrease in tuft number was less than that observed in the control group. Essentially, the same result was obtained when VEGF/VPF121 was used instead of VEGF/VPF165 (Figure 4d).

Effect of VEGF/VPF on Glomerular Repair and Cellular Proliferation

Mesangial proliferation

The score of mesangial proliferation was defined as 1.0 before the anti-Thy-1.1 antibody injection (Figure 5a). In the control group, the mesangial proliferation score remained at a low level on day 4, but it increased 2.6-fold on day 18 (Figure 5a). With VEGF/VPF165 treatment, the score increased already 2.1-fold higher than that of the controls on day 4, and decreased to the initial level by day 18 (Figure 5a).

Figure 5
figure5

Effect of recombinant VEGF/VPF165 on the proliferation of the cells in the glomerulus during the course of glomerulo-nephritis. Recombinant VEGF/VPF165 or BSA was administered on the first 4 days of the experiment as described in the text. Mesangial proliferation score (a), vWF-positive area per glome-rulus (b) and relative number of PCNA-positive cells per glomerulus (c) on day 0 (before the anti-Thy-1.1 antibody injection), day 4 and day 18 are shown. Each experiment was independently repeated three times. **P<0.01.

Endothelial cell proliferation

In the control animals (Figures 5b and 6d, j), the area composed of endothelial cells had increased by 1.6-fold on day 4 and remained at the same level through day 18. With VEGF/VPF165 treatment (Figures 5b and 6g, m), the endothelial area increased by about 2.3-fold on day 4 but returned to almost the initial level on day 18. The endothelial area of VEGF/VPF-treated animals was larger than that of the control animals on day 4, but smaller on day 18.

Figure 6
figure6

Changes of endothelial cells and proliferating cells during the course of glomerulonephritis. Immunofluorescent staining with vWF (green, left lane) and PCNA (red, middle lane), and merge of both the images (right lane) of a representative glomerulus before anti-Thy-1.1 antibody injection (ac), and representative glomeruli in control (day 4 (d–f) and day 18 (j–l)) and VEGF/VPF-treated animals (day 4 (g–i) and day 18 (m–o)) are shown (magnification × 140).

Proliferating cells

In the control group (Figures 5c and 6e, k), PCNA-positive cells increased by about two-fold on day 4, and returned to almost the initial level on day 18. With VEGF/VPF165 treatment (Figures 5c and 6h, n), the number of PCNA-positive cells increased about three-fold on day 4, but it had decreased to a level much lower than the initial level on day 18.

VEGF/VPF Concentration in the Blood

Serum VEGF/VPF concentration was under detection limit (<30 pg/ml) throughout the course of glomerulonephritis both in control and VEGF-treated animals.

Assessment of renal function

Serum creatinine concentration did not change throughout the course of glomerulonephritis. In control animals, the ratio of urinary protein to urinary creatinine was 0.69±0.16 before the anti-Thy-1.1 antibody injection, and 3.77±1.83 on day 4. In VEGF/VPF165-treated animals, the ratio was 1.11±0.30 before the antibody injection and 1.58±0.65 on day 4. Thus, urinary protein excretion on day 4 was suppressed to less than half by VEGF/VPF treatment.

Expression of Flk-1 in the renal cortex

On day 1, Flk-1 expression level in renal cortical tissue was suppressed by the anti-Thy-1.1 antibody injection, and further suppressed by VEGF/VPF165 (Figure 7a) or VEGF/VPF121 treatment (Figure 7b).

Figure 7
figure7

Suppression of Flk-1 expression in renal cortical tissues by VEGF/VPF165 (a) or VEGF/VPF121 (b) treatment. Densities of the Flk-1 bands decrease in the order of normal>control>VEGF/VPF. Normal, control and VEGF/VPF represent the supernatants of homogenates from the animal before the antibody injection, from the control animal on day 1, and from the VEGF/VPF-treated animal on day 1, respectively.

Discussion

In glomerulonephritis, induced in rats by injecting the monoclonal antibody to Thy-1.1, the degree of glomerular injury is dependent on the amount of injected antibody. By injecting a typical dose of antibody, severe mesangiolysis and ballooning of tufts were induced, changes rarely observed in human mesangial proliferative glomerulonephritis. To produce histological changes more compatible to those in human disease, we injected much less antibody and obtained glomerulonephritis lesions with relatively mild structural changes (Figure 1b–e) and without significant renal dysfunction. The changes were similar to glomerular changes seen in human disease.

VEGF/VPF165 or VEGF/VPF121 reduced the loss of capillary tufts but not of mesangial cells on day 1 after antibody injection (Figure 4), which indicates that either isoform prevents tuft dilation or rupture without preventing mesangiolysis (Figure 1f). This capillary protection may not be explained by angio-genic activity to maintain the microvasculature.15 Since glomerular endothelial apoptosis was not observed on day 1 under the present experimental condition, this protective effect cannot be explained by the antiapoptosis activity of VEGF/VPF.14, 17, 26 The VEGF/VPF activity to stimulate endothelial cells, reorganizing their cytoskeleton,27 may make them more resistant to the stretching stress caused by loss of mesangial cells. The fact that the proliferation of endothelial cells was observed on day 4, when mesangial proliferation had not yet been present (Figure 5a, b), indicates that endothelial cell proliferation precedes mesangial proliferation. Since capillary structure can be a scaffold for the glomerular remodeling, this order of events may be essential for efficient repairing of injured glomeruli. The origin of mesangial cells committed to repair the lesion of mesangiolysis has not yet been identified. Mesangial cells might migrate to the lesion along the capillary from a vascular pole of the injured glomerulus or bone marrow-derived cells might migrate and differentiate in the lesion as reported recently.28 Whatever the origin is, preserved vessel structure is mandatory as an access for the cells to the lesion. The protection of endothelial cells by VEGF/VPF treatment caused an early onset of endothelial and mesangial cell proliferation, and resulted in early completion of repair as compared with the nontreated animals (Figure 1). This may explain the degree of proteinuria suppression caused by VEGF/VPF165 treatment. It is likely that the rate of glomerular cell repair inversely correlates to the degree of the initial endothelial injury.11

Besides proliferation,VEGF/VPF stimulates endothelial cells to secrete cytokines including platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF),29 hepatocyte growth factor (HGF),23 nitric oxide (NO),30 and prostacyclin.31 PDGF stimulates mesangial cells to proliferate32 and, in turn, activated mesangial cells secrete VEGF/VPF. HGF induces VEGF/VPF expression.33 NO and prostacyclin provide vascular protection.19 Thus, VEGF/VPF may protect glomerular endothelial cells in an indirect way, whereby positive-feedback mechanisms may operate.

VEGF/VPF isoforms administered intravenously stimulate the receptor Flk-1, located in the luminal side of the endothelial cells.34 The different binding affinities of isoforms to the matrix5 are not involved in this route of administration. The isoforms injected into the animals in the present study should result in plasma VEGF/VPF concentrations higher than 10 nM. This is at concentrations in which binding of the isoforms to recombinant Flk-1 is saturated. Therefore, the endothelial cell mitogenic activity is similar between VEGF/VPF165 and VEGF/VPF121 in our experimental condition; although the VEGF/VPF165 is more effective than the smaller isoform at lower concentrations. As intrinsic VEGF/VPF isoform concentrations in the blood are less than 30 pg/ml and administered VEGF/VPF concentration is initially higher than 1 μg/ml, the Flk-1 at the luminal side of endothelial cells is presumably occupied by the administered VEGF/VPF isoforms. The Flk-1 expression level in the renal cortex was equally suppressed by VEGF/VPF165 and VEGF/VPF121. Therefore, it may be relevant that VEGF/VPF165 and VEGF/VPF121 intravenous administrations equally protected glomerular endothelial cells (Figure 4). To compare the protective activities of the two isoforms more precisely, further studies using lower concentrations of the isoforms would be necessary.

Conclusion

This is the first study to show that VEGF/VPF121 and VEGF/VPF165 equally protect glomerular endothelial cells against injury by an apoptosis-independent mechanism. This protection might be applicable as a therapeutic strategy in renal diseases.

References

  1. 1

    Ferrara N . Vascular endothelial growth factor: molecular and biological aspects. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol 1999;237:1–30.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. 2

    Ng YS, Rohan R, Sunday ME, et al. Differential expression of VEGF isoforms in mouse during development and in the adult. Dev Dyn 2001;220: 112–121.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3

    Gitay-Goren H, Cohen T, Tessler S, et al. Selective binding of VEGF121 to one of the three vascular endothelial growth factor receptors of vascular endo-thelial cells. J Biol Chem 1996;271:5519–5523.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4

    Keyt BA, Berleau LT, Nguyen HV, et al. The carboxyl-terminal domain (111–165) of vascular endothelial growth factor is critical for its mitogenic potency. J Biol Chem 1996;271:7788–7795.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5

    Houck KA, Leung DW, Rowland AM, et al. Dual regulation of vascular endothelial growth factor bio-availability by genetic and proteolytic mechanisms. J Biol Chem 1992;267:26031–26037.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. 6

    Soker S, Takashima S, Miao HQ, et al. Neuropilin-1 is expressed by endothelial and tumor cells as an isoform-specific receptor for vascular endothelial growth factor. Cell 1998;92:735–745.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7

    Guo P, Xu L, Pan S, et al. Vascular endothelial growth factor isoforms display distinct activities in promoting tumor angiogenesis at different anatomic sites. Cancer Res 2001;61:8569–8577.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. 8

    Carmeliet P, Ng YS, Nuyens D, et al. Impaired myocardial angiogenesis and ischemic cardiomyo-pathy in mice lacking the vascular endothelial growth factor isoforms VEGF164 and VEGF188. Nat Med 1999;5:495–502.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9

    Mattot V, Moons L, Lupu F, et al. Loss of the VEGF164 and VEGF188 isoforms impairs postnatal glomerular angiogenesis and renal arteriogenesis in mice. J Am Soc Nephrol 2002;13:1548–1560.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10

    Pabst R, Sterzel RB . Cell renewal of glomerular cell types in normal rats. An autoradiographic analysis. Kidney Int 1983;24:626–631.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. 11

    Shimizu A, Kitamura H, Masuda Y, et al. Rare glomerular capillary regeneration and subsequent capillary regression with endothelial cell apoptosis in progressive glomerulonephritis. Am J Pathol 1997; 151:1231–1239.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. 12

    Alon T, Hemo I, Itin A, et al. Vascular endothelial growth factor acts as a survival factor for newly formed retinal vessels and has implications for retinopathy of prematurity. Nat Med 1995;1:1024–1028.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13

    Benjamin E, Keshet E . Conditional switching of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) expression in tumors: induction of endothelial cell shedding and regression of hemangioblastoma-like vessels by VEGF withdrawal. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1997;94: 8761–8766.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14

    Gerber HP, Dixit V, Ferrara N . Vascular endothelial growth factor induces expression of the antiapoptotic proteins Bcl-2 and A1 in vascular endothelial cells. J Biol Chem 1998;273:13313–13316.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15

    Kang DH, Hughes J, Mazzali M, et al. Impaired angiogenesis in the remnant kidney model: II. Vascular endothelial growth factor administration reduces renal fibrosis and stabilizes renal function. J Am Soc Nephrol 2001;12:1448–1457.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. 16

    Kelly DJ, Hepper C, Wu LL, et al. Vascular endothelial growth factor expression and glomerular endothelial cell loss in the remnant kidney model. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2003;18:1286–1292.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17

    Ostendorf T, Kunter U, Eitner F, et al. VEGF(165) mediates glomerular endothelial repair. J Clin Invest 1999;104:913–923.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18

    Masuda Y, Shimizu A, Mori T, et al. Vascular endo-thelial growth factor enhances glomerular capillary repair and accelerates resolution of experimentally induced glomerulonephritis. Am J Pathol 2001;159: 599–608.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19

    Zachary I, Mathur A, Yla-Herttuala S, et al. Vascular protection: a novel nonangiogenic cardiovascular role for vascular endothelial growth factor. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2000;20:1512–1520.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20

    Castilla MA, Caramelo C, Gazapo RM, et al. Role of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) in endothelial cell protection against cytotoxic agents. Life Sci 2000;67:1003–1013.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21

    Kuzuya M, Ramos MA, Kanda S, et al. VEGF protects against oxidized LDL toxicity to endothelial cells by an intracellular glutathione-dependent mechanism through the KDR receptor. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2001;21:765–770.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22

    Jin KL, Mao XO, Greenberg DA . Vascular endothelial growth factor: direct neuroprotective effect in in vitro ischemia. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2000;97: 10242–10247.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23

    LeCouter J, Moritz DR, Li B, et al. Angiogenesis-independent endothelial protection of liver: role of VEGFR-1. Science 2003;299:890–893.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24

    Ishizaki M, Masuda Y, Fukuda Y, et al. Experimental mesangioproliferative glomerulonephritis in rats induced by intravenous administration of anti-thymocyte serum. Acta Pathol Jpn 1986;36:1191–1203.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. 25

    Iyonaga K, Takeya M, Yamamoto T, et al. A novel monoclonal antibody, RM-4, specifically recognizes rat macrophages and dendritic cells in formalin-fixed, paraffin- embedded tissues. Histochem J 1997;29:105–116.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26

    Watanabe Y, Dvorak HF . Vascular permeability factor/vascular endothelial growth factor inhibits anchorage-disruption-induced apoptosis in microvessel endothelial cells by inducing scaffold formation. Exp Cell Res 1997;233:340–349.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27

    Enomoto T, Okamoto T, Sato JD, et al. Vascular endothelial growth factor induces the disorganization of actin stress fibers accompanied by protein tyrosine phosphorylation and morphological change in Balb/C3T3 cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 1994;202: 1716–1723.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28

    Imasawa T, Utsunomiya Y, Kawamura T, et al. The potential of bone marrow-derived cells to differentiate to glomerular mesangial cells. J Am Soc Nephrol 2001; 12:1401–1409.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. 29

    Collins T, Ginsburg D, Boss JM, et al. Cultured human endothelial cells express platelet- derived growth factor B chain: cDNA cloning and structural analysis. Nature 1985;316:748–750.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30

    Ku DD, Zaleski JK, Liu S, et al. Vascular endothelial growth factor induces EDRF- dependent relaxation in coronary arteries. Am J Physiol 1993;265:H586–H592.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. 31

    Wheeler-Jones C, Abu-Ghazaleh R, Cospedal R, et al. Vascular endothelial growth factor stimulates prostacyclin production and activation of cytosolic phospholipase A2 in endothelial cells via p42/p44 mitogen-activated protein kinase. FEBS Lett 1997;420: 28–32.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32

    Shultz PJ, DiCorleto PE, Silver BJ, et al. Mesangial cells express PDGF mRNAs and proliferate in response to PDGF. Am J Physiol 1988;255:F674–F684.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33

    Van Belle E, Witzenbichler B, Chen D, et al. Potentiated angiogenic effect of scatter factor/hepatocyte growth factor via induction of vascular endothelial growth factor: the case for paracrine amplification of angiogenesis. Circulation 1998;97:381–390.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34

    Feng D, Nagy JA, Brekken RA, et al. Ultrastructural localization of the vascular permeability factor/vascular endothelial growth factor (VPF/VEGF) receptor-2 (FLK-1, KDR) in normal mouse kidney and in the hyperpermeable vessels induced by VPF/VEGF- expressing tumors and adenoviral vectors. J Histochem Cytochem 2000;48:545–556.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Dr J Evan Sadler and Dr Ivette Revollo for useful discussions. We also thank Miss Noriko Teramoto and Miss Yasuyo Hayashida for their technical assistance. This work was supported by Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research from Japanese Ministry of Education and Science (13671120 to YK).

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yasunori Kitamoto.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Miyamoto, K., Kitamoto, Y., Tokunaga, H. et al. Protective effect of vascular endothelial growth factor/vascular permeability factor 165 and 121 on glomerular endothelial cell injury in the rat. Lab Invest 84, 1126–1136 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1038/labinvest.3700134

Download citation

Keywords

  • VEGF/VPF165
  • VEGF/VPF121
  • endothelial protection
  • repair
  • glomerulonephritis

Further reading

Search