Letter | Published:

Cloned lines of natural killer cells

Abstract

A class of cytotoxic effector cells has recently been discovered1,2 in normal and immunodeficient nude mice that lyse a wide range of targets of both tumour and non-tumour origin. Unlike other lymphocytes, these natural killer (NK) cells are present at high levels without prior priming and have no immunological memory. Because NK cells act without prior sensitization, they could have a crucial role in immunosurveillance, providing a first defence against arising neoplastic cells. The question of NK-cell specificity is not well understood; results so far suggest that they may recognize specific antigens on their targets. Thus unlabelled competitor cells can inhibit the cytotoxic reaction of NK cells3. Furthermore, target–effector binding can be inhibited by isolated target structures4. Experiments in which the lysis of mouse and human NK-sensitive targets was competitively inhibited with target suggested that the targets recognized by NK cells are not common ones. To study this important aspect, permanent lines and clones of NK cells have been established in vitro. I report here a successful attempt to do this, and show that sublines display the same specificity spectrum as NK cells from normal cells even after recloning. This proves that antigen receptors on NK cells are not clonally distributed but leaves open the two possibilities that NK cells either recognize common structures on NK-sensitive targets or carry many receptors each with a different specificity. Cell-surface markers of NK lines distinguished them from allospecific thymus-derived lymphocyte cell lines through their lack of Lyt-1 and Lyt-2 antigen.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

References

  1. 1

    Roder, J. C. & Kiessling, R. Scand. J. Immun. 8, 135 (1978).

  2. 2

    Herberman, R. B. & Holden, H. T. Adv. Cancer Res. 27, 305 (1978).

  3. 3

    Kiessling, R., Klein, E. & Wigzell, H. Eur. J. Immun. 5, 112 (1975).

  4. 4

    Roder, J. C., Rosèn, A., Fenyö, E. M. & Troy, F. A. Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 76, 1405 (1979).

  5. 5

    Rosenberg, S. A., Spiess, P. J. & Schwarz, S. J. Immun. 121, 1946 (1978).

  6. 6

    Dennert, G. & Hyman, R. Eur. J. Immun. (in the press).

  7. 7

    Dennert, G. & Hyman, R. Eur. J. Immun. 7, 251 (1979).

  8. 8

    Herberman, R. B., Nunn, M. E. & Holden, H. T. J. Immun. 121, 304 (1978).

  9. 9

    Mattes, M. J., Sharrow, S. O., Herberman, R. B. & Holden, H. T. J. Immun. 123, 2851 (1979).

  10. 10

    Omary, B., Trowbridge, I. & Scheid, M. J. exp. Med. (in the press).

  11. 11

    Dennert, G. Nature 277, 476 (1979).

Download references

Author information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Further reading

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.