Scientific Reports 5: Article number: 10285; published online: 20 May 2015; updated: 14 September 2016

This Article contains typographical errors in the Methods section,

“We varied the excess pressure drop between 1 · 107 and 5 · 108 Pa. We evaluated the best fitting model compared to the residual InSAR velocities based on the residual sum of squares, weighted by the inverse of the covariance matrix. The best fit model had an excess pressure drop of 3.2 · 108 Pa”.

should read:

“We varied the excess pressure drop between 1 · 104 and 5 · 105 Pa. We evaluated the best fitting model compared to the residual InSAR velocities based on the residual sum of squares, weighted by the inverse of the covariance matrix. The best fit model had an excess pressure drop of 3.2 · 105 Pa”.