Abstract
Microscopy in the context of biomedical research is demanding new tools to automatically detect and capture objects of interest. The few extant packages addressing this need, however, have enjoyed limited uptake due to complexity of use and installation. To overcome these drawbacks, we developed iMSRC, which combines ease of use and installation with high flexibility and enables applications such as rare event detection and high-resolution tissue sample screening, saving time and resources.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
High automation capabilities applied to optical microscopy paved the way for converting microscopes into intelligent screening platforms, i.e. instruments able to automatically detect objects of interest based on an image analysis routine and capture them at high resolution. The use of this new strategy saves on acquisition time, optimizes resources (Fig. 1 and Fig. 2b and c and Supplementary Fig. S5) and enables advanced applications, such as rare event detection (e.g. circulating tumour cells (CTCs); Fig. 1 and Fig. 2c).
While there are a small number of open-source codes which might permit microscope automation (see, e.g. Icy1, Endrov2 or Micropilot3), these usually require advanced programming skills and are often hobbled by hardware compatibility issues (e.g. driver availability on the Micro-manager4 platform), making their implementation difficult for core facilities and, more importantly, being complex to use and adapt.
On the other hand, microscope manufacturers’ acquisition software is much easier to use and boasts optimized hardware compatibility. However, due to its very limited flexibility, its use in intelligent screening approaches is often unfeasible.
To overcome these limitations, we developed iMSRC (intelligent Matrix Screener Remote Control), a new open source software-based solution capable of implementing distinct intelligent screening applications through exploiting the simplicity of the microscope’s native software (Supplementary Fig. S1).
iMSRC gathers all relevant information from acquisition files generated by proprietary software. Then, upon analyzing preliminary images (“First scan”) through conventional image analysis platforms (e.g. ImageJ5 or MATLAB) it creates new acquisition files containing ad hoc generated settings, managing the launch of a new capture sequence focused on objects of interest, meeting the specific requirements of any experimental design and allowing for complex experimental set-up not otherwise possible (Fig. 1 and Supplementary Fig. S1). Symbiosis with proprietary software guarantees hardware compatibility (there is no need for installing new pieces of hardware or drivers, or programming new drivers), ease of use (there is no need to learn to use a new capturing environment) and avoids the need for complex hardware and software installation.
iMSRC-driven microscopy is user-friendly, fully compatible with both confocal and wide-field microscopes and accessible to any user, independently of their programming or microscopy skills.
iMSRC has already proven its functionality and versatility in several research applications, including high-resolution Tissue Microarray confocal capture6 (Fig. 2b), live, time-lapse, single stem cell detection in customized PDMS microchips7,8, hippocampus dentate gyrus-specific cell-type detection in brain sections (Supplementary Fig. S6) and circulating tumour cell (CTCs) detection9 (Fig. 2c). The identification and high-magnification mosaic capturing of specific regions within tissue sections, such as in the case of breast metastasis and GFP-expressing regions in different organs have also been successfully accomplished.
iMSRC can be deployed in any conventional Linux PC following a few simple installation steps, publishing the user graphical interface for software control as a web page, which is then fully accessible through the most common web browsers from any computer within the same network (Supplementary Fig. S1b). The addition of new microscopes to the structure is straightforward, rapid and can be performed within the same web page (Supplementary Fig. S2).
Although direct connection with a microscope workstation is also possible, network access offers the following advantages, which are particularly useful to core facilities and laboratories that share equipment: (i) a single iMSRC installation can be accessed by all instruments, managing intelligent screening in all of them, unifying access and simplifying use; (ii) access to all required utilities, including image analysis script routines and microscope choice dialog, is centralized, making management easier; (iii) to ensure safety, all software administration (including macro upload, see Supplementary Fig. S3, or a new microscope addition, see Supplementary Fig. S2) can be made accessible only to authorized staff using authentication. Besides the novelty of this approach, no additional software installation on the microscope computers is required, maintaining maximum performance.
iMSRC’s full compatibility has been thoroughly assessed in different institutions and on a wide variety of systems and local network configurations.
iMSRC has been tested on Leica TCS-SP5 and TCS-SP8 laser scanning confocals and in Leica DMI6000B and DMI8 wide-field microscopes. The only requisite for iMSRC to work is that the proprietary software running a microscope generates a comprehensive metadata file that can be edited and loaded again into such software. For this reason, compatibility with Nikon and Zeiss does not seem plausible to date; compatibility with any other microscopes (e.g. Olympus) is conditioned to the fact that the previous criteria are fulfilled.
How to use iMSRC
Intelligent screenings with iMSRC are performed in three steps (Figs. 1,2 and Supplementary Fig. S6).
Step 1. First scan: capture of a searching mosaic, composed of juxtaposed images covering the entire sample. This is intended to have minimum resolution, with a large field of view in order to locate the events of interest at the maximum possible speed.
Step 2. Running an image analysis routine designed to locate the coordinates of the objects of interest previously defined in the searching mosaic
Step 3. Second scan: Final acquisition of identified objects using the parameter settings predefined to achieve the desired image properties (i.e. objective, zoom, Z-stack and time lapse). Importantly, the change of objective lenses between scans will be directly controlled by iMSRC, which automatically applies predefined paracentricity correction (Supplementary Fig. S4).
iMSRC supports multiple sample acquisition and allows any format compatible with a particular microscope’s frame adapters, such as microtiter plates and dishes, or up to five slides in parallel (Supplementary Fig. S6).
Parameters for both first and second scans are built up in the proprietary software and must be stored as two independent files in a local or remote shared folder (Supplementary Fig. S2).
iMSRC is equipped by default with a series of macros for tissue or cell detection which covers the vast majority of applications. If these are not sufficient to implement a particular object detection, a user with no programming skills but basic knowledge of image analysis could create his or her own image analysis routine and simply copy and paste one line of code in order to make it fully compatible with iMSRC (Supplementary Fig. S3).
New image analysis routines can be virtually, designed using any image analysis software, as long as the final result is a list of coordinates of detected objects. Additionally, objects of interest can also be manually selected from the searching mosaic image by the user, adding a further layer of useful flexibility to the whole system (Supplementary Fig. S6).
The iMSRC graphical interface is accessible through a web page where the user can easily choose among different options, allowing for loading the previously saved capture settings for both first and second scans on extendable menus and fine-tuning of all parameters necessary for objects detection (Fig. 2a and Supplementary Fig. S3).
Once all the settings have been defined, they can be saved as a template and reloaded, which simplifies further experiments.
When iMSRC is launched, objects smaller than a single field of view will be captured as an individual picture; bigger objects will be covered by high-resolution mosaics. In the case of the latter, the acquisition of non-informative regions (NoIR) in the vicinity of the objects of interest can be prevented by activating the “NoIR” option (Fig. 2a). When this additional feature is activated, a secondary analysis for just those objects identified in Step 2 will run, disabling irrelevant acquisition fields. This ensures the perfect fitting for irregular samples, saving valuable acquisition time and resources — something that is particularly relevant when capturing large, irregularly-shaped objects (Supplementary Fig. S5).
If a microscope is equipped with a communications port (i.e. the Computer Aided Microscope port [CAM] of Leica microscopes), iMSRC can automatically launch the whole process that directs information flow between the capturing and analysis software by means of a single click (“Play”; Supplementary Fig. S1). Importantly, even when this port is not available, each step can still be sequentially launched by the user. Manual workflow is also recommended when performing complex image analysis, which might require a revision of the identified areas prior to launching the final acquisition step.
Conclusions
We present iMSRC, a tool based on a new approach that converts conventional automated microscopes into easy-to-use intelligent systems able to automatically localize and capture events of interest, making novel experimental designs affordable.
iMSRC’s has already proved its applicability thorough its implementation in several papers publications and its spreading to different institutions. The combination of features offered by the iMSRC platform make it a valuable tool, which fills a wide gap in the field of bioimaging software usability, as identified in a recent publication10.
IMSRC download and more details are available in http://iMSRC.bioinfo.cnio.es web page.
Materials and Methods
In all cases, images were acquired using a confocal TCS-SP5-WLL (AOBS) spectral microscope (Leica Mycrosystems, Wetzlar, Germany). Its acquisition software is LAS AF v2.6 (Leica).
Automated, multiple, size- and shape-heterogeneous, tissue microarray capturing (Fig. 2b).
This is based on previously published work — check reference 7 for further details.
Several control and clinical tissues can be extracted, fixed, cut into small pieces and placed on the same slide for further staining. The result is called a Tissue Microarray (TMA), which is useful for minimizing sample variation and use of reagents.
Briefly, TMAs consisting of a mixture of healthy and cancerous tissue types and phases were obtained from mouse xenograft models, double immunostained for different pairs of primary antibodies, revealed with Alexa Fluor 488 and Alexa Fluor 555 and nucleus-counterstained with DAPI.
The resulting sample was analyzed under a microscope driven by iMSRC which was tuned to automatically detect and capture at high resolution every single region of tissue in the TMA.
The acquisition workflow is detailed in supplementary materials and methods.
Automated image analysis detection of rare circulating tumour cells (Fig. 2c).
Circulating tumour cells (CTCs) spread to the blood from both primary and metastatic cancers and are believed to play a role in the spread of the disease throughout the body9.
A novel microfluidic device (The IsoFlux System, Fluxion Biosciences Inc, South San Francisco,CA) has recently been described and which enables the CTC enrichment of blood samples. These samples are usually further tested using an immunofluorescence assay based on detecting nucleated, cytokeratin (CK)-positive, CD45-negative cells.
Detailed protocols can be found in reference 9 and in Fluxion Biosciences Inc’s CTC Enumeration and CTC Enrichment kits.
A typical analytical design for testing CTC recovery in this device begins with preparing samples with a defined number of CTCs, which is done by isolating a known number of positive CTCs and spiking them into blood from a healthy donor. The frequency of CTCs in these samples is generally less than 1 in 400 (0.25%), which justifies the need for automated cell detection.
Briefly, clinical blood samples were processed for CTC enrichment, subsequently spiked into healthy donor blood and dispensed on to a standard slide for imaging. Cell nuclei were then counterstained with Hoechst 33342 and double immunostained for CK (FITC directly conjugated fluorophore) and CD45 (indirectly labeled with a Cy3-conjugated antibody).
The resulting sample was analyzed under a microscope driven by iMSRC set to automatically detect and capture CTCs at high resolution.
The acquisition workflow is detailed in supplementary materials and methods.
Additional Information
How to cite this article: Carro, A. et al. iMSRC: converting a standard automated microscope into an intelligent screening platform. Sci. Rep. 5, 10502; doi: 10.1038/srep10502 (2015).
References
de Chaumont, F. et al. Icy: an open bioimage informatics platform for extended reproducible research. Nat. Methods 9, 690–696 (2012).
Henriksson, J. et al. Endrov: an integrated platform for image analysis. Nat. Methods 10, 454–456 (2013).
Conrad, C. et al. Micropilot: automation of fluorescence microscopy-based imaging for systems biology. Nat. Methods 8, 246 (2011).
Edelstein A., Amodaj N., Hoover K., Vale R., Stuurman N. Computer control of microscopes using μManager. Curr. Protoc. Mol. Biol. Chapter 14:Unit14.20 (2010).
Schneider, C. A., Rasband, W. S. & Eliceiri, K. W. NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis. Nat. Methods 9, 671–675 (2012).
Alonso-Curbelo, D. et al. RAB7 controls melanoma progression by exploiting a lineage-specific wiring of the endolysosomal pathway. Cancer Cell 26, 61–76 (2014).
Clausell-Tormos, J. et al. Nano-volume well array chip for large-scale propagation and high-resolution analysis of individual cancer stem cells. J. Nanomed. Nanotechnol. 5, 191–198 (2014)
Miranda-Lorenzo, I. et al. Intracellular autofluorescence: a biomarker for epithelial cancer stem cells. Nat. Methods 11, 1161–1169 (2014).
Harb, W. et al. Mutational Analysis of Circulating Tumor Cells Using a Novel Microfluidic Collection Device and qPCR Assay. Transl. Oncol. 6, 528–538 (2013).
Carpenter, A. E., Kamentsky, L., & Eliceiri, K. W. A call for bioimaging software usability. Nat. Methods 9, 666–670 (2012).
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank Dr. Rocio Ramos-Medina, from the Laboratory of Translational Oncology, Health Research Institute of Gregorio Marañón [IiSGM], Madrid, Spain, for her contribution on cell rare detection, Ms. Lola Martínez and Drs Maria Luigia de Bonis and Ultan Philip Cronin for reviewing the manuscript, Juan Luis Monteagudo, Paco Porto and Frank Sieckmann for technical support and Drs. Direna Alonso and Jenifer Clausell for beta testing.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
D. conceived iMSRC. A. developed iMSRC software and website. J. developed and tested the image analysis scripts. D. M. and J. designed the experiments, tested the system, analyzed data and wrote the main text of the manuscript. D. and D.G. supervised microscopy and software development, respectively. All authors reviewed the manuscript, prepared the figures and contributed to the website contents.
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Electronic supplementary material
Rights and permissions
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
About this article
Cite this article
Carro, A., Perez-Martinez, M., Soriano, J. et al. iMSRC: converting a standard automated microscope into an intelligent screening platform. Sci Rep 5, 10502 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1038/srep10502
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/srep10502
This article is cited by
-
Enabling reactive microscopy with MicroMator
Nature Communications (2022)
-
Somatic genome editing with the RCAS-TVA-CRISPR-Cas9 system for precision tumor modeling
Nature Communications (2018)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.