Abstract
The control of emission from localized light sources is an objective of outstanding relevance in nanophotonics. In a recent past, a large number of metallic nanostructures has been proposed to this end, wherein plasmonic modes are exploited as energy carriers on a subwavelength scale. As an interesting alternative, we present here the use of surface modes on patterned dielectric multilayers to deliver electromagnetic power from free-space to localized volumes and vice versa. Thanks to this low-loss energy transfer, proper periodic ring structures are shown to provide a subwavelength focusing of an external radiation onto the multilayer surface. By reciprocity, the radiated power from emitters within the ring center is shown to be efficiently beamed in the free-space, with a well-controlled angular divergence. This mechanism overcomes some important limitations involved in the all-plasmonic approach, while opening new opportunities for hybrid devices in photon management applications such as optical sensing and lighting.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
The transfer of electromagnetic energy between free-space and localized volumes has deserved intense research efforts during the last years. The nano-antenna paradigm well illustrates this general concept at optical frequencies1, especially in cases wherein the energy delivery is resonantly assisted by plasmonic modes2. Individual antennas constituted by single or few nano-scatterers3,4,5,6,7 can convert deeply confined energy into freely propagating radiation (and vice versa) according to some angularly anisotropy, i.e. the antenna directivity. On the other hand, when multiple antennas are spatially arranged in proper arrays, the overall directivity can be greatly improved, at the cost of a general lack of energy localization in the near-field8,9,10,11. However, periodic structures can also act as mere couplers for propagating surface plasmons12 that can be further localized on a subwavelength scale by several additional means13,14,15. Therefore, a system based on periodic structures can still support an energy conversion process between localized volumes and free-space, when mediated by propagating surface plasmons16. Previously proposed arrangements, which exploit circular gratings coupled to plasmonic nano-cavities, have been demonstrated to exhibit both a strong energy confinement capability and a good directivity of the radiated electromagnetic field17,18. Unfortunately, the use of surface plasmons as energy carriers in these systems suffers from ohmic losses that reduce the efficiency of the overall mechanism.
In order to overcome the limitation above, we propose here an alternative approach wherein the energy transfer between free-space and localized volumes is mediated by surface modes on dielectric multilayers. The low absorption exhibited by the multilayer materials makes the surface modes propagating over long distances, in the order of hundreds of micrometers19 in a very wide spectral range. In the specific arrangement presented here, we demonstrate that a structure constituted by a circular grating on a planar multilayer shows optical features similar to the well-known plasmonic ring antennas18 with much narrower resonances. In fact, despite the underlying physics is radically different, the multilayered grating structure can out-couple radiation emitted by localized sources with a very high directivity into the free-space and in-couple and focus surface waves on a subwavelength scale, according to the limitations imposed by an all-dielectric structure. In addition to the experimental evidence for these two effects, we also provide a quantitative estimation of the fluorescence collection enhancement obtained by exploiting the antenna effect in an exemplary low-Numerical Aperture optical system.
Results
BWS coupling and focusing
The sample structure is sketched in Figure 1 and detailed in the Method section. Very briefly, it consists of a dielectric multilayer constituted by a periodic stack of Silica and Tantalia layers, whereon circular gratings are fabricated. The multilayer is such that TE-polarized surface modes (also called Bloch Surface Waves –BSWs-) can be sustained at wavelengths below 600 nm, as illustrated by the angularly resolved reflectivity map shown in Supplementary Figure S1(a). The BSW field distribution across the multilayer is quite strongly confined on the surface, where an intense near-field enhancement occurs20 (Supplementary Figure S1(b)). This effect is due to two reasons: (i) the BSW is a surface-bound state (i.e. the BSW wavevector is larger than 2π/λ and therefore it does not leak in air), (ii) the BSW dispersion curve lays within a forbidden band of the underlying multilayer. Given the stack sequence described in the Method section, two kinds of multilayers are considered here: a “regular” layout consisting of 16 total layers and a “low leakage” layout, consisting of 22 layers. The main difference between the two layouts is in the total amount of power that can be resonantly transferred from/to the BSW to/from propagating radiation in the glass substrate. Although the band structure of these two kinds of multilayers is substantially similar (and so is the BSW dispersion curve), the “low leakage” layout sustains BSW with lower losses due to leakage into the substrate.
The circular grating is etched on the multilayer top layer in such a way that a ring pattern is arranged with a spatial period Λ = 520 nm around a flat inner spacer. The total thickness of the grating is about 100 nm. The grating vector is radially oriented with respect to the circular grating center and has a module K = 2π/Λ = 12.08 μm−1 that is very close to the BSW wavevector in the wavelength range between 532 nm and 590 nm wavelength.
When an external radiation of a specific wavelength λ is impinging on the circular grating from air, it undergoes diffraction according to the Bragg's law. The first-order (+1) diffracted radiation has a wavevector component kT+1 parallel to the multilayer surface as given by kT+1 = kT0 + K, where kT0 is the wavevector component of the incident radiation parallel to the multilayer surface. When kT+1 matches the BSW wavevector, energy coupling between the incident radiation and the surface mode can occur. For an incidence radiation with wavelength λ = 532 nm (as used here), the BSW cannot be coupled at a perfectly normal incidence, but an incidence angle of about 2.3 degrees is required.
In a recent paper it has been demonstrated that a linear grating can couple BSW on a planar multilayer21. In the case of the ring structures shown here, the grating has a curvature radius and an in-plane focusing effect can be expected for the grating-coupled BSW, in analogy to surface plasmons22,23. This effect has been observed by locally illuminating a portion of a circular grating fabricated on a “regular” multilayer and observing the leakage radiation associated to BSW as collected with an interference leakage radiation microscope (detailed in the Method section and illustrated in Supplementary Figure S2). Starting from the illuminated area, a BSW is coupled and then focused in a central region of the inner spacer surrounded by the circular grating. Experimental amplitude and phase maps of the focused BSW are shown in Supplementary Figure S3. The appearance of a pair of phase dislocations in the BSW focal region supports the observation of the focusing effect24.
More interestingly, when the circular grating is homogeneously and fully illuminated with the laser beam, the coupling to BSW can occur according to the local spatial orientation of the grating. A circular BSW converging toward the center can be then produced. In order to provide momentum matching between BSW and the incident radiation through the grating, the angular spread of the laser beam can be slightly adjusted (see Methods section). Experimental amplitude and phase maps of focused BSW are presented in Fig. 2(a,b). If the laser is linearly polarized, BSW can be coupled only from locations of the rings wherein a polarization matching condition is satisfied. Specifically, the TE-polarization of BSW allow efficient coupling only from those regions having grating vector perpendicular to the laser polarization. In the present case, for a y-polarized incident beam, the leakage radiation associated to the focused BSW has a two-lobe symmetric distribution oriented along the x-axis. When the laser polarization is rotated, the observed pattern is rotated accordingly (see Supplementary Figure S4). The BSW focusing effect produces a subwavelength central lobe in the spacer center, with an estimated Full Width Half Height of about 220 nm (Fig. 2(c)).
We observe that the amplitude profile shows a fringe pattern with a spatial frequency doubled as compared to the wavefront frequency appearing in Fig. 2(b). This is due to an interference effect by two counter-propagating BSWs. The phase cross-section along the horizontal line sketched in Fig. 2(b) shows a sawtooh profile indicating the two counter-propagating BSWs converging at the grating center (Fig. 2(d)). The existence of these two counter-propagating BSWs can be better appreciated by considering the Fourier spectrum amplitude calculated from the complex field (obtained from measured amplitude and phase) along the horizontal line (Fig. 2(e)). The Fourier spectrum amplitude exhibits two main contributions peaked at spatial frequencies fx = ±2.025 μm−1, corresponding to the calculated BSW spatial frequency obtained from the BSW dispersion shown in Supplementary Figure S1(a).
The benefits from BSW focusing can be appreciated in cases wherein a selective enhanced fluorescence excitation is desired in the spacer center only. Fluorescence measurements are performed after incubation of AlexaFluor 546-labelled protein A on the sample. In this way, a rather photostable fluorescent layer can be homogeneously provided over a large surface area. Figure 3 shows direct plane fluorescence images of a ring structure homogeneously illuminated by a collimated laser. The setup used for these measurements is described in the Method section. The illumination area is extending well beyond the lateral size of the circular grating. Moreover, it is worth to underline that fluorescence collection is performed here by a NA = 0.2 objective working in air, in such a way that the BSW-coupled fluorescence leaking into the substrate is prevented to contribute to the image formation.
When the incident laser is circularly polarized, a fluorescence image as shown in Fig. 3(a) is collected. We observe some fluorescence emitted from the whole grating surrounding a bright spot located in the spacer center. Although the organic emitter is homogeneously distributed on the whole multilayer surface, at the outside of the ring structure the background fluorescence is rather low. By taking a (normalized) intensity profile along the horizontal line drawn in Fig. 3(a), the intensity contrast across the structure can be better appreciated. The bright central spot shows a fluorescence intensity that is roughly 10 times higher than the fluorescence coming from the outside of the ring (Fig. 3(b)). This increase in fluorescence is produced by the BSW coupling and focusing from the laser illumination. Since the spacer region is flat and rather wide, any physical accumulation of the emitting molecules on the surface can be excluded.
In case the incident laser radiation is linearly polarized, the fluorescence pattern shows a two-lobed shape, whose orientation rotates depending on the orientation of the laser polarization (Fig. 3(c–e)). By comparing results with the interferometric analysis of Fig. 2, we can conclude that the fluorescence distribution presented above mainly represents the fluorescence trace of the BSW coupled from the laser. However, it is well known that the fluorescence emission can in turn couple to surface modes25. This effect is separately addressed in the next sections.
Fluorescence beaming
In this section, the coupling of localized emitters to BSW on the multilayered ring structure is considered. In order to investigate the coupling of fluorescence into the multilayer modes and the corresponding propagation directions out of the sample, a microscopy technique based on Back Focal Plane (BFP) imaging26,27 is employed (details in the Methods section). Illumination is provided as a focused laser beam.
Figure 4(a) shows a typical BFP fluorescence image collected from a planar area with no adjacent structures. The observed bright rings correspond to fluorescence coupled to TE and TM modes of the multilayer and leaking into the glass substrate20. In particular, fluorescence coupled into BSW is associated to the bright yellow ring with radius [(kx/k0)2 + (ky/k0)2]1/2 ≈ 1.04. The radius of the detected BSW-coupled fluorescence ring depends on the BSW dispersion curve28. The other rings correspond to fluorescence coupled in other multilayer modes. Superposed to the BFP image, cross sectional intensity profiles (R-channel and G-channel) along an horizontal line at ky/k0 = 0 are plotted. In addition, individual images corresponding to the R-channel and G-channel intensities are separately shown in a row on top of the RGB image. A polarization analysis shows that the BSW-coupled fluorescence has an inhomogeneous polarization that is azimuthally distributed28, as expected from the TE-polarization of BSW (see Supplementary Figure S6). A more detailed BFP-based analysis of BSW-coupled fluorescence from planar multilayers can be found at Ref. 20.
When fluorescence is locally excited in the flat center of a grating spacer (D = 5 μm, Λ = 520 nm), a bright spot appears at kx/k0 = 0, ky/k0 = 0 in the corresponding BFP image, while the BSW-coupled fluorescence ring gets weaker (Fig. 4(b)). By illuminating the flat central area surrounded by the circular grating, we prevent the direct BSW coupling from the laser. The bright spot at kx/k0 = 0, ky/k0 = 0 is associated to fluorescence leaving the sample almost normally to the surface, with an estimated full divergence of less than 15 degrees. Thanks to a mechanism analogous to some plasmonic systems29,30, a portion of the energy emitted by the excited sources (characterized by randomly distributed dipolar momenta) is transferred to BSWs which in turn radially propagate away from the illuminated area. BSWs are then diffracted out of the multilayer by means of the circular grating, producing the observed beaming effect. In this respect, BSWs are mediating the transfer of energy from the localized sources to the free-space.
Unfortunately, as BSWs propagate onto the multilayer surface, some losses due to radiation leakage into the substrate occur. In order to prevent or minimize this unwanted effect, a “low leakage” multilayer has been employed (see Method section). Similarly to Fig. 4(b), Fig. 4(c) shows a fluorescence BFP image for a circular grating fabricated on a “low leakage” multilayer. Illumination is still provided by focusing the laser in the grating spacer center. After looking at the intensity contrast between the beamed central spot and the fluorescence coupled into other multilayers modes (including the BSW) or the fluorescence background, a general improvement of the beaming effect can be appreciated. Both the R-channel and the G-channel data indicate a significant increase in the light emitted along the multilayer normal direction, thanks to a reduction of losses in the energy-transfer mechanism mediated by BSWs.
The beaming effect can be largely improved if the circular grating is fabricated as an additive pattern on top of the last SiO2 layer of the stack. By properly playing with the dielectric loading mechanism (producing a redshift of the BSW dispersion curve19,31) and the circular grating period, we managed to fabricate an additive polymeric grating that significantly increases the amount of beamed fluorescence in a given spectral range. An exemplary result is illustrated in Supplementary Figure S7.
As discussed, the beaming effect arises from diffraction of BSW-coupled fluorescence propagating radially from the grating center, where multiple sources are excited. No such an effect can be observed if the circular symmetry is broken (i.e. the excitation laser spot is off-center). In order to interpret the observed beaming in the BFP images, the following geometrical model is proposed. The circular grating can be considered as composed by multiple wedges of locally linear gratings, radially oriented. In a polar reference system centered in the spacer center, each wedge corresponds to a specific azimuthal angle. Assuming most of the radiated power as coupled to BSW, we can apply the Bragg law to each wedge, taking the fluorescent BSW as the incident radiation. On the Fourier plane, fluorescence diffracted on the first order (+1) is distributed as a circular branch obtained by shifting the BSW-coupled fluorescence ring by an amount equal to the local grating vector module16. The direction of such a displacement is radial and oriented according to the azimuthal angle of the specific wedge considered. As a result, multiple first-order (+1) diffraction branches appear within the portion of the Fourier plane limited by the maximum NA of collection (NA = 1.49 in the present case). The superposition of all diffraction branches leads to the appearance of a circular caustic in the Fourier plane, i.e. a geometrical locus wherein the diffracted power from each wedge accumulates. The size of the circular caustic depends on the grating vector K = 2π/Λ. When K equals the fluorescent BSW wavevector (for a given wavelength), the caustic collapses into a single accumulation point, thus leading to a normally diffracted beaming with almost zero divergence. This model is very well supported by experimental observations. Several gratings with different periods Λ have been fabricated and employed for BSW-assisted beaming. Results are shown in Fig. 5, together with the corresponding caustics calculated analytically on the Fourier plane.
When looking at the direct image of the 1DPC surface, we observe that the fluorescence beaming effect involves a diffraction mechanism occurring on the whole surface of the grating. BSW-coupled fluorescence can propagate radially from the sources excited in the inner spacer by the focused laser. Thanks to the low losses, BSW can propagates for long distances and undergo diffraction by the grating Fig. 6(a)). Similarly to the direct plane images in Fig. 3, the collection optics used here has a low NA to prevent the contribution of substrate-leaking BSW-coupled fluorescence to the image (See Methods section). The measured intensity profile along a horizontal cross section shows a central maximum surrounded by a pair of symmetric, decreasing lobes. While the lobes are due to a BSW-assisted diffraction effect only, the intensity from the central peak is also due to fluorescence that is directly emitted in the free-space without any coupling to 1DPC modes (Fig. 6(b)). In particular, the lobe intensity drops quickly at the outer boundary of the circular grating, where no any further diffraction occurs. During the propagation across the grating, the BSW-coupled fluorescence undergoes losses mainly due to leakage and diffraction and the observed fluorescence intensity becomes weaker and weaker as the grating outer boundaries are approached.
The plurality of sources excited by the focused laser have randomly oriented dipolar momentum, therefore the coupling to BSW can occur over all radial directions. However, the BSW are TE-polarized and this polarization state can be directly observed in the beamed fluorescence as well. Specifically, the diffracted fluorescence possesses an inhomogeneous polarization distribution depending on the azimuthal position of the local grating region it comes from. By inserting a polarization analyser along the collection path, the image in Fig. 6(a) is polarization filtered according to the analyser angular position, as shown in Fig. 6(c–e). This result confirms the BSW-assisted characteristics of the beamed fluorescence. It should be recalled now that most of the fluorescence intensity observed in Fig. 6 is directed almost normally to the 1DPC surface, leading to a BSW-assisted radiation extraction mechanism somehow complementary to the BSW focusing shown in Fig. 2 and Fig. 3.
Improvement in fluorescence collection at low Numerical Apertures
Results shown above suggest that the collection of fluorescence at low NA would be significantly improved thanks to the BSW-assisted beaming effect. In this section we attempt a quantitative estimation of the fluorescence collection improvement.
In order to quantify the enhancement in fluorescence collection, we setup an original scanning microscope as illustrated in Fig. 7 and detailed in the Method section. Briefly, a scanning system is employed to locally laser-illuminate the sample surface and to feed the collected fluorescence into a spectrometer through a collection fiber. The fiber can be positioned on a BFP image plane, in such a way that only light having specific propagation directions is collected during the scan. Therefore, this system can provide image data with spatial, angular and spectral resolution for the collected fluorescence over a given raster scanned area. In the next, we present experimental results wherein the collection fiber collects fluorescence from a circular region centered at kx/k0 = ky/k0 = 0 on the BFP and corresponding to a NA ≈ 0.1.
The false-color image in Fig. 8(a) is related to the collected fluorescence from a scan area containing the circular grating. Intensity values are integrated over a wavelength range from λ = 570 nm to λ = 595 nm, after background subtraction. A significant increase of fluorescence is observed corresponding to the grating inner spacer, while the grating itself shows a faint fluorescence as compared to the background. This means that the BSW-assisted beaming effect improves the collection of fluorescence at NA ≈ 0.1 only when the focused laser illuminates the spacer center, contrary to the case wherein the laser is focused elsewhere.
In Fig. 8(b), the emission spectrum from the inner spacer (integration over the black square in Fig. 8(a)) is compared to the emission spectrum from a region outside the structure (integration over the green square on top right corner in Fig. 8(a)). In order to quantify a collection enhancement factor due to the beaming effect, several spectral ranges are considered, as sketched in the Fig. 8(b). For each spectral range, the ratio Ispacer/Ioutside is calculated, wherein Ispacer and Ioutside refer to the fluorescence intensities integrated over the corresponding spectral range and over spatial regions defined by the black box and the green box in Fig. 8(a), respectively. A set of values for the ratio Ispacer/Ioutside is obtained by making the green box sequentially sampling the whole image, with the exclusion of the grating area. Finally, the collected data set for each spectral range are represented as histograms, as shown in Fig. 8(c–g). Each histogram provides information about the statistical distribution of the enhancement factor, clearly wavelength-dependent. For example, the highest enhancement factor is estimated as 26.37 ± 10.93 and it is observed for wavelengths between 582.5 nm and 588.75 nm (Fig. 8(e)). If the total wavelength range from λ = 570 nm to λ = 595 nm is considered, the enhancement factor is estimated as 19.18 ± 5.36 (Fig. 8(g)).
Discussion
In this work we demonstrate that BSW on 1DPC can play the role of mediator of energy transfer from localized volumes to free space and vice versa. For example, a grating coupler can focus BSW at the 1DPC/air interface on a region smaller than the diffraction limit for propagating light in air. The surface-bound nature of BSW is such that the field intensity reaches its maximum substantially at the 1DPC surface. Although such an all-dielectric approach is not suitable to attain to a deep subwavelength localization of electromagnetic energy, as in many nano-plasmonic arrangements, BSW focusing represents a real three dimensional confinement of radiation over a region that is substantially planar and several microns apart from the coupling structure.
By reciprocity, emitters located on the 1DPC surface are likely to couple a significant portion of energy to BSW, despite the inherently multimodal features of the 1DPC32. This preferential coupling can also be ascribed to the surface-bound nature of BSW. Once radiated energy is transferred to BSW, it can be manipulated with diffraction gratings, as shown in the results presented above. Other arrangements can be used as well, including waveguides19, refractive elements33 and so on. Unlike the majority of photonic crystal structures, the surface modes are here sustained without the need of any surface corrugation34. Therefore, BSW can be further manipulated by fabricating suitable elements on a basically flat surface, thus easing the overall fabrication process.
The use of BSW as energy carrier presents some advantages as compared, for example, to the surface plasmon counterpart. First, losses due to absorption are dramatically reduced thanks to the use of dielectric materials. This effect produces direct benefits in terms of surface wave propagation length, resonance quality factor and near-field enhancement on the 1DPC surface as well. Furthermore, BSW spectral range (from UV to near infrared), dispersion and polarization state (either TE or TM) can be almost arbitrarily tuned by operating on the 1DPC design35,36,37.
In conclusion, we provide here an all-dielectric platform showing an inherent surface-resonant behavior38 that can be exploited for energy transfer over large distances. Although we presented a specific illustrative example of some BSW-mediated effects, the underlying principle can be widely applied to other arrangements. For example, plasmonic nano-structures such as nano-antennas or nano-particles can be integrated on a 1DPC surface, in a so-called hybrid configuration39 in such a way that further field confinement effects can be produced. The use of dielectric multilayers is compatible with most of the fabrication technology currently employed for optical nano-antennas on transparent substrates. Therefore, it would be possible to surround the plasmonic nano-objects with a photonic-tailored environment that can ease the coupling of energy (e.g. elastic scattering, fluorescence, Raman) to/from the outer world, mediated by BSW40,41,42,43. The improvements from this platform can be readily appreciated in a number of surface-optics application fields such as lens-free optical sensing44,45 and lighting46,47.
Methods
Sample fabrication
The 1DPC consists of a dielectric multilayer made of a stack of Ta2O5 (high refractive index) and SiO2 (low refractive index) layers, deposited on a glass coverslip 150 μm thickness by plasma ion assisted deposition under high vacuum conditions (APS904 coating system, Leybold Optics). A schematic of the sample is presented in the Fig. 1. The stack sequence is glass-[Ta2O5-SiO2] × 6-Ta2O5-SiO2-air for the “regular” layout, while we have glass-[Ta2O5-SiO2] × 10-Ta2O5-SiO2-air for the “low leakage” layout. Therefore, the “regular” multilayer has a total of 16 layers, while the “low-leakage” multilayer keeps the same stack sequence but has 22 layers in total. The Ta2O5 layer is 95 nm thick, the SiO2 layer is 137 nm thick, but the latest SiO2 layer on top of the stack is only 127 nm thick. The ring structure is fabricated by electron beam lithography followed by a Reactive Ion Etching step. The geometrical parameters are detailed in the Fig. 1. For fluorescence-based measurements, a homogeneous thin layer of protein A labelled with AlexaFluor 546 at a concentration of 3 μg/ml is incubated on the sample surface and then washed. Due to electrostatic interaction, the fluorescent protein is homogeneously grafted on the sample surface, thus providing a very thin layer of fluorescent material. Having a uniform distribution of emitters on the sample surface raises some advantages. Indeed, it allows to locally excite fluorescence in any location, by simply focusing an excitation laser beam where needed. In addition, when the illumination is distributed over a large area, intensity contrast comparisons are readily accessible by a simple offline analysis of wide-field images.
The planar multilayer sustains BSW having a dispersion curve as illustrated by the calculated reflectance map shown in Supplementary Figure S1(a). The calculated BSW intensity profile at a wavelength λ = 532 nm shows a 600 fold enhancement on the multilayer surface, as illustrated in Supplementary Figure S1(b).
Leakage radiation interference microscopy setup
The experimental setup is sketched in Supplementary Figure S2. A detailed description of the working principle of the interferometric technique employed for the amplitude and phase retrieval in this arrangement can be found elsewhere48. A collimated beam from a frequency doubled Nd:YAG laser source at λ = 532 nm is split in two arms of a Mach-Zehnder interferometer by means of a Polarizing Beam Splitter (PBS). The polarization of the light beams can be independently controlled through a pair of half wavelength plates and Glan-Taylor polarizers. The object beam is used for illumination and sent to an objective (Numerical Aperture, NA = 0.5) used for sample illumination. The effective NA of the illumination objective can be reduced by operating on a diaphragm in front of the objective entrance pupil. In this way, the angular spread of the incident laser beam can be tuned in order to satisfy the momentum matching required for BSW grating-coupling.
Leakage radiation emerging from the sample is collected with an oil immersion objective (Nikon APO TIRF 100×, NA = 1.49) and imaged through a tube lens on a Charge-Coupled Device (CCD), where it is superposed with the reference beam. The phase of the reference beam is changed from 0 to 2π in five steps by means of a piezo-actuated mirror. The five corresponding images are fed into an offline image processing algorithm based on the Schwider–Hariharan method49 and amplitude and phase distributions of the collected field (leakage radiation) are then retrieved. In order to collect the leakage radiation only, a beam blocker has been inserted after the collection objective in such a way that the light propagating inside the light cone in air (NA ≤ 1) is filtered out.
Fluorescence imaging systems
Fluorescence images are collected by employing two apparatuses. For the Back Focal Plane (BFP) measurement, a colour RGB CMOS camera (DCC1645C from Thorlabs) is used. The setup is sketched in Supplementary Figure S5(a) and has an upper illumination stage and a lower collection stage. In the measurements presented here, the upper stage mounts a NA = 0.2 objective (Zeiss Ultrafluar 10×) working in air. The lower stage mounts a NA = 1.49 oil immersion objective with (Nikon APO TIRF 100×). The illumination objective focuses a doubled frequency Nd:YAG laser beam (λ = 532 nm) onto the sample surface. The laser beam is obtained by collimating the output of a single-mode fiber wherein a free-space propagating beam has been injected from the laser cavity. In order to filter out the Raman signal coming from the fiber, a laser line filter is employed after the collimation of the beam (532 nm MaxLine®, Semrock). Upon illumination, the light leaking into the substrate is collected by the oil immersion objective and then spectrally filtered (RazorEdge® Longpass 532, Semrock) in order to block the laser radiation. A tube lens produces a BFP image of the collection objective onto the camera. Thanks to this feature, the angular distribution of fluorescence leaking into the substrate can be imaged. For the direct imaging of the multilayer surface (e.g. as shown in Fig. 3 and Fig. 5), a monochromatic CCD camera (Apogee Ascent) is employed, as shown in Supplementary Figures S5(b,c). Most of the setup is analogous to the previous one, but the laser illumination from the upper objective is distributed as a uniform beam over a circular region 150 μm wide. This homogeneous illumination can be obtained by feeding the illumination objective with a laser beam weakly focused on its back focal plane, in such a way that the objective operates as a collimator. In alternative, illumination can be a focused laser beam (Supplementary Figure S5(c)). Fluorescence is collected by a NA = 0.2 objective operating in air, in such a way that only the directly emitted fluorescence and the beamed BSW-coupled fluorescence contribute to the final image recorded on the camera, therefore excluding the BSW-coupled fluorescence leaking into the substrate.
BFP Scanning fluorescence microscope
The setup is aimed at performing a spectral analysis of light emitted from the sample surface with both spatial and angular resolution. As sketched in Fig. 7, the sample is scanned through a focused laser beam (λ = 532 nm) emerging from an oil immersion objective (NA = 1.49). The leakage radiation is collected by means of the same objective and then passed through an edge filter (RazorEdge® Longpass 532) to filter out the laser radiation. A tube lens produces a magnified BFP image of the collection objective onto a remote plane, wherein a multimode fiber end is located. The fiber end is supported by a two-dimensional translational stage and can be accurately moved onto the BFP image plane. The fiber collects fluorescence from specific portions on the BFP image and delivers the collected radiation to a spectrometer (Acton SpectraPro 300, Princeton Instruments). Since the angular resolution achievable with such a system is inversely proportional to the lateral dimension of the collection fiber core, we found a tradeoff between fiber diameter, BFP magnification factor and signal-to-noise ratio of fluorescence spectra as measured by the spectrometer CCD. In a suitable configuration, the fiber diameter is completely contained within a region of NA ≤ 0.1 on the BFP image plane. During the scan, fluorescence is locally excited by the focused laser spot. For each scan position, the fluorescence spectrum can be recorded, according to the specific propagation direction as determined by positioning the collection fiber onto the BFP image. The presented measurement consists of an array of 150 × 150 pixels, with an integration time of 5 ms for each pixel. The laser illumination is kept at low power to avoid rapid photobleaching of the emission during the scan.
References
Novotny, L. & Van Hulst, N. F. Antennas for light. Nat. Photon. 5, 83–90 (2011).
Liu, Z. et al. Focusing surface plasmons with a plasmonic lens. Nano Lett. 5, 1726 (2005).
Kosako, T., Kadoya, Y. & Hofmann, H. F. Directional control of light by a nano-optical Yagi-Uda antenna. Nat. Photon. 4, 312–315 (2010).
Coenen, T., Vesseur, E. J., Polman, A. & Koenderink, F. A. Directional emission from plasmonic Yagi-Uda antennas probed by angle-resolved cathodoluminescence spectroscopy. Nano Lett. 11, 3779–84 (2011).
Curto, A. G. et al. Unidirectional emission of a quantum dot coupled to a nanoantenna. Science 329, 930–933 (2010).
Taminiau, T. H., Stefani, F. D., Segerink, F. B. & Van Hulst, N. F. Optical antennas direct single-molecule emission. Nat. Photon. 2, 234–237 (2008).
Schoen, D. T., Coenen, T., Garcia de Abajo, F. J., Brongersma, M. L. & Polman, A. The planar parabolic optical antenna. Nano Lett. 13, 188–193 (2013).
Dregely, D. et al. 3D optical Yagi-Uda nanoantenna array. Nat. Comm. 2, 267 (2011).
Langguth, L., Punj, D., Wenger, J. & Koenderink, F. A. Plasmonic band structure controls single-molecule fluorescence. ACS Nano 7, 8840–8848 (2013).
Li, H. et al. Tunable plasmons in shallow silver nanowell arrays for directional surface-enhanced raman scattering. J. Phys. Chem. C. 116, 23608–15 (2012).
Li, H. et al. Active plasmonic nanoantennas for controlling fluorescence beams. J. Phys. Chem. C. 117, 19154–59 (2013).
Baron, A. et al. Compact antenna for efficient and unidirectional launching and decoupling of surface plasmons. Nano Lett. 11, 4207 (2011).
Zhao, C., Liu, Y., Zhao, Y., Fang, N. & Huang, T. J. A reconfigurable plasmofuidic lens. Nat. Comm. 4, 2305 (2013).
Lerman, G. M. & Levy, U. Pin cushion plasmonic device for polarization beam splitting, focusing and beam position estimation. Nano Lett. 13, 1100–1105 (2013).
Zentgraf, T., Liu, Y., Mikkelsen, M. H., Valentine, J. & Zhang, X. Plasmonic luneburg and eaton lenses. Nat. Nano. 6, 151–155 (2011).
Offerhaus et al. Creating focused plasmons by noncollinear phasematching on functional gratings. Nano Lett. 5, 2144–2148 (2005).
Jun, C., Huang, K. C. Y. & Brongersma, M. Plasmonic beaming and active control over fluorescent emission. Nat. Comm 2, 283 (2011).
Aouani, H. et al. Plasmonic antennas for directional sorting of fluorescence emission. Nano Lett. 11, 2400–2406 (2011).
Descrovi, E. et al. Guided Bloch surface waves on ultrathin polymeric ridges. Nano Lett. 10, 2087–2091 (2012).
Badugu, R., Nowaczyk, K., Descrovi, E. & Lakowicz, J. R. Radiative Decay engineering 6: fluorescence on one-dimensional photonic crystal. Anal. Biochem. 442, (2013).
Descrovi, E. et al. Leakage radiation interference microscopy. Opt. Lett. 38, 3374–3376 (2013).
Lerman, G. M., Yanai, A. & Levy, U. Demonstration of nanofocusing by the use of plasmonic lens illuminated with radially polarized light. Nano Lett. 9, 2139–2143 (2009).
Zhaowei, L. et al. Focusing surface plasmons with a plasmonic lens. Nano Lett. 5, 1726–1729 (2005).
Kim, J. et al. Experimental and theoretical study of the Gouy phase anomaly of light in the focus of microlenses. J. Opt. 15, 105708 (2013).
Ballarini, M. et al. Bloch surface waves-controlled emission of organic dyes grafted on a one-dimensional photonic crystal. Appl. Phys. Lett. 99, 043302 (2011).
Zhang, D. G., Yuan, X. C., Yuan, G. H., Wang, P. & Ming, H. Directional fluorescence emission characterized with leakage radiation microscopy. J. Opt. 12, 035002 (2010).
Sersic, I., Tuambilangana, C. & Koenderink, A. F. Fourier microscopy of single plasmonic scatterer. New J. Phys. 13, 083019 (2011).
Angelini, A. et al. Fluorescence diffraction assisted by Bloch surface waves on a one-dimensional photonic crystal. New J. Phys. 15, 073002 (2013).
Rui, G., Abeysinghe, D. C., Nelson, R. L. & Zhan, Q. Demonstration of beam steering via dipole-coupled plasmonic spiral antenna. Sci. Rep. 3, 2237 2013 (2013).
Aouani, H. et al. Bright unidirectional emission of molecules in a nanoaperture with surface corrugations. Nano Lett. 11, 637–644 (2011).
Lu, H. et al. Polymer-loaded propagating modes on a one-dimensional photonic crystal. Appl. Phys. Lett. 104, 061115 (2014).
Zhang, D. et al. Back focal plane imaging of directional emission from dye molecules coupled to one-dimensional photonic crystals. Nanotechnology 25, 145202 (2014).
Yu, L. et al. Manipulation Bloch surface waves in 2D: a platform concept based flat lens. Light: Sci. Appl. 3, e124 (2014).
Ganesh, N. et al. Enhanced fluorescence emission from quantum dots on a photonic crystal surface. Nat. Nano. 2, 515–520 (2007).
Descrovi, E., Giorgis, F., Dominici, L. & Michelotti, F. Experimental observation of optical bandgaps for surface electromagnetic waves in a periodically corrugated one-dimensional silicon nitride photonic crystal. Opt. Lett. 33, 243–245 (2008).
Farmer, A., Friedli, C. A., Wright, S. M. & Robertson, W. M. Biosensing using surface electromagnetic waves in photonic bandgap multilayers. Sens. Actuators B 173, 79–84 (2012).
Sreekanth, K. V., Zeng, S., Shang, J., Yong, K. T. & Yu, T. Excitation of surface electromagnetic waves in a graphene-based Bragg grating. Sci. Rep. 2, 737 (2012).
Lee, K. G. et al. A planar dielectric antenna for directional single-photon emission and near-unity collection efficiency. Nat. Photon. 5, 166–169 (2011).
Chanda, D. et al. Coupling of plasmonic and optical cavity modes in quasi-three-dimensional plasmonic crystals. Nat. Comm. 2, 479 (2011).
Wang, D., Yang, T. & Crozier, K. B. Optical antennas integrated with concentric ring gratings: electric field enhancement and directional radiation. Opt. Express 19, 2148 (2011).
Ahmed, A. & Gordon, R. Directivity enhanced Raman spectroscopy using nanoantennas. Nano Lett. 11, 1800–1803 (2011).
Pirotta, S. et al. Surface-Enhanced Raman Scattering in Purely Dielectric Structures via Bloch Surface Waves. J. Phys. Chem. C 117, 6821–6825 (2013).
Schmidt, M. A., Lei, D. Y., Wondraczek, L., Nazabal, V. & Maier, S. Hybrid nanoparticle–microcavity-based plasmonic nanosensors with improved detection resolution and extended remote-sensing ability. Nat. Comm. 3, 1108 (2012).
Cetin, A. E. et al. Handheld high-throughput plasmonic biosensor using computational on-chip imaging. Light: Sci. Appl. 3, e122 (2014).
Toma, M. et al. Surface plasmon-coupled emission on plasmonic Bragg gratings. Opt. Express 20, 14042–14053 (2012).
Choy, J. T. et al. Spontaneous emission and collection efficiency enhancement of single emitters in diamond via plasmonic cavities and gratings. Appl. Phys. Lett. 103, 161101 (2013).
Lozano, G. et al. Plasmonics for solid-state lighting: enhanced excitation and directional emission of highly efficient light sources. Light: Sci. Appl. 2, e66 (2013).
Kim, M. S., Scharf, T., Etrich, C., Rockstuhl, C. & Herzig, H. P. Longitudinal-differential interferometry: direct imaging of axial superluminal phase propagation. Opt. Lett. 37, 305–307 (2012).
Hariharan, P. P., Oreb, B. F. & Eiju, T. Digital phase-shifting interferometry: a simple error-compensating phase calculation algorithm. Appl. Opt. 26, 2504 2056 (1987).
Acknowledgements
This research has received funding from the Italian Flagship Project NANOMAX (Progetto Bandiera MIUR PNR 2011–2013), the Italian FIRB 2011 NEWTON (RBAP11BYNP), the Swiss National Science Foundation (SNSF) and the EU FP7 project BILOBA (Grant # 318035).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
E.D. conceived the idea and wrote the manuscript. A.A. performed calculations and fluorescence measurements. E.B. performed the interferometric measurements. P.M. performed the multilayer deposition. L.B., N.D.L. and E.E. developed the fabrication process for ring structures on multilayers. C.F.P., F.G. and H.P.H. supervised the activities. All authors contributed to the scientific discussion and revision of the article.
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Electronic supplementary material
Supplementary Information
Supplementary Figures
Rights and permissions
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder in order to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
About this article
Cite this article
Angelini, A., Barakat, E., Munzert, P. et al. Focusing and Extraction of Light mediated by Bloch Surface Waves. Sci Rep 4, 5428 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1038/srep05428
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/srep05428
This article is cited by
-
High-Q lasing via all-dielectric Bloch-surface-wave platform
Nature Communications (2023)
-
Correcting the formalism governing Bloch Surface Waves excited by 3D Gaussian beams
Communications Physics (2020)
-
Interacting polariton fluids in a monolayer of tungsten disulfide
Nature Nanotechnology (2018)
-
Multiple self-healing Bloch surface wave beams generated by a two-dimensional fraxicon
Communications Physics (2018)
-
High-speed flow of interacting organic polaritons
Light: Science & Applications (2016)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.