Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • News & Views
  • Published:

Rheumatoid arthritis

Triple therapy or etanercept after methotrexate failure in RA?

Since the 1990s, patients with rheumatoid arthritis have been treated with at least one DMARD. Methotrexate, which is usually the first-line treatment, elicits good or even excellent clinical results in 20–30% of patients—but in most patients it does not. Thus, an important question is what to do after methotrexate failure.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

References

  1. O'Dell, J. R. et al. Therapies for active rheumatoid arthritis after methotrexate failure. N. Engl. J. Med. http://dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1303006.

  2. O'Dell, J. R. et al. Treatment of rheumatoid arthritis with methotrexate alone, sulfasalazine and hydroxychloroquine, or a combination of all three medications. N. Engl. J. Med. 334, 1287–1291 (1996).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. O'Dell, J. R. et al. Treatment of rheumatoid arthritis with methotrexate and hydroxychloroquine, methotrexate and sulfasalazine, or a combination of the three medications: results of a two-year, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Arthritis Rheum. 46, 1164–1170 (2002).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Mottonen, T. et al. Comparison of combination therapy with single-drug therapy in early rheumatoid arthritis: a randomised trial. FIN-RACo trial group. Lancet 353, 1568–1573 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Goekoop-Ruiterman, Y. P. et al. Comparison of treatment strategies in early rheumatoid arthritis: a randomized trial. Ann. Intern. Med. 146, 406–415 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Emery, P. et al. Guidelines for initiation of anti-tumour necrosis factor therapy in rheumatoid arthritis: similarities and differences across Europe. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 68, 456–459 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Smolen, J. S. et al. EULAR recommendations for the management of rheumatoid arthritis with synthetic and biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 69, 964–975 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Moreland, L. W. et al. A randomized comparative effectiveness study of oral triple therapy versus etanercept plus methotrexate in early aggressive rheumatoid arthritis: the treatment of Early Aggressive Rheumatoid Arthritis Trial. Arthritis Rheum. 64, 2824–2835 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. van Vollenhoven, R. F. et al. Addition of infliximab compared with addition of sulfasalazine and hydroxychloroquine to methotrexate in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis (Swefot trial): 1 year results of a randomised trial. Lancet 374, 459–466 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. van Vollenhoven, R. F. et al. Conventional combination treatment versus biological treatment in methotrexate-refractory early rheumatoid arthritis: 2 year follow-up of the randomised, non-blinded, parallel-group Swefot trial. Lancet 379, 1712–1720 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ronald F. van Vollenhoven.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

R. F. van Vollenhoven has acted as a consultant for and received grant/research support from AbbVie, BMS, GSK, MSD, Pfizer, Roche and UCB. K. Chatzidionysiou declares no competing interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

van Vollenhoven, R., Chatzidionysiou, K. Triple therapy or etanercept after methotrexate failure in RA?. Nat Rev Rheumatol 9, 510–512 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1038/nrrheum.2013.118

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nrrheum.2013.118

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing