Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • News & Views
  • Published:

Liver transplantation

Toward a unified allocation system

The multiple indications for liver transplantation make prioritization for organ allocation a hotly debated topic. Evidence is building that the current allocation system favors patients with hepatocellular carcinoma and should be replaced with one based on transplant benefit and not just survival.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

References

  1. Cucchetti, A. et al. Can the dropout risk of candidates with hepatocellular carcinoma predict survival after liver transplantation? Am. J. Transplant. 11, 1696–1704 (2011).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Ioannou, G. N., Perkins, J. D. & Carithers, R. L. Jr. Liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma: impact of the MELD allocation system and predictors of survival. Gastroenterology 134, 1342–1351 (2008).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Washburn, K., Edwards, E., Harper, A. & Freeman, R. Hepatocellular carcinoma patients are advantaged in the current liver transplant allocation system. Am. J. Transplant. 10, 1643–1648 (2010).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Lesurtel, M. & Clavien, P. A. 2010 international consensus conference on liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma. Liver Transpl. doi:10.1002/lt.22350.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Schaubel, D. E. et al. Survival benefit-based deceased-donor liver allocation. Am. J. Transplant. 9, 970–981 (2009).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Cholongitas, E., Germani, G. & Burroughs, A. K. Prioritization for liver transplantation. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 7, 659–668 (2010).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Merion, R. M. Current status and future of liver transplantation. Semin. Liver Dis. 30, 411–421 (2010).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Zarrinpar, A., Kaldas, F. & Busuttil, R. W. Liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma: an update. Hepatobiliary Pancreat. Dis. Int. 10, 234–242 (2011).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. DuBay, D. et al. Liver transplantation for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma using poor tumor differentiation on biopsy as an exclusion criterion. Ann. Surg. 253, 166–172 (2011).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Freeman, R. B., Edwards, E. B. & Harper, A. M. Waiting list removal rates among patients with chronic and malignant liver diseases. Am. J. Transplant. 6, 1416–1421 (2006).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ronald W. Busuttil.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zarrinpar, A., Busuttil, R. Toward a unified allocation system. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 8, 542–543 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1038/nrgastro.2011.163

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nrgastro.2011.163

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing