Abstract
A supercycle describes a long-term cluster of differently-sized megathrust earthquakes, leading up to the final complete failure of a subduction zone segment1,2. The precise controls on supercycles are unclear, although structural and frictional heterogeneities are proposed1. We recognize that supercycles are suggested to occur in those regions1,2,3,4 where the estimated downdip width of the seismogenic zone5,6,7 is larger than average. Here we investigate the link between supercycles and the seismogenic zone downdip width using a two-dimensional numerical model8. In our simulations, the first megathrust earthquakes in a supercycle generally rupture only the outermost parts of the seismogenic zone. These partial ruptures are stopped owing to a large excess of strength over stress, and transfer stresses towards the centre of the seismogenic zone. In addition to the continued tectonic loading, they thereby gradually reduce the strength excess so that the largest megathrust events finally rupture the entire seismogenic zone and release most of the accumulated stress. A greater width increases the average strength excess and thus favours supercycles over ordinary cycles of only similarly sized complete ruptures. Our results imply that larger than thus far observed earthquakes could conclude a supercycle where seismogenic zone widths are larger than average.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$259.00 per year
only $21.58 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on SpringerLink
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Sieh, K. et al. Earthquake supercycles inferred from sea-level changes recorded in the corals of West Sumatra. Science 322, 1674–1678 (2008).
Goldfinger, C., Ikeda, Y., Yeats, R. S. & Ren, J. Superquakes and supercycles. Seismol. Res. Lett. 84, 24–32 (2013).
Metois, M. et al. GPS-derived interseismic coupling on the subduction and seismic hazards in the Atacama region, Chile. Geophys. J. Int. 196, 644–655 (2014).
Chlieh, M. et al. Distribution of discrete seismic asperities and aseismic slip along the Ecuadorian megathrust. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 400, 292–301 (2014).
Heuret, A., Lallemand, S., Funiciello, F., Piromallo, C. & Faccenna, C. Physical characteristics of subduction interface type seismogenic zones revisited. Geochem. Geophys. Geosys. 12, Q01004 (2011).
Hayes, G. P., Wald, D. J. & Johnson, R. L. Slab1.0: A three-dimensional model of global subduction zone geometries. J. Geophys. Res. 117, B01302 (2012).
Hayes, G. P., McNamara, D. E., L.Seidman, L. & Roger, J. Quantifying potential earthquake and tsunami hazard in the Lesser Antilles subduction zone of the Caribbean region. Geophys. J. Int. 196, 510–521 (2013).
van Dinther, Y. et al. The seismic cycle at subduction thrusts: 2. Dynamic implications of geodynamic simulations validated with laboratory models. J. Geophys. Res. 118, 1502–1525 (2013).
Ando, M. Source mechanisms and tectonic significance of historical earthquakes along the Nankai trough, Japan. Tectonophysics 27, 119–140 (1975).
Kanamori, H. & McNally, K. C. Variable rupture mode of the subduction zone along the Ecuador–Colombia coast. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 72, 1241–1253 (1982).
Thatcher, W. Order and diversity in the modes of circum-Pacific earthquake recurrence. Geophys. Res. 95, 2609–2623 (1990).
Cisternas, M. et al. Predecessors of the giant 1960 Chile earthquake. Nature 437, 404–407 (2005).
Hyndman, R. D. The Seismogenic Zone of Subduction Thrust Faults 15–40 (Columbia Univ. Press, 2007).
McCaffrey, R. Global frequency of magnitude 9 earthquakes. Geology 36, 263–266 (2008).
Stein, S., Geller, R. J. & Liu, M. Why earthquake hazard maps often fail and what to do about it. Tectonophysics 562-563, 1–25 (2012).
Kagan, Y. Y. & Jackson, D. D. Tohoku Earthquake: A Surprise? Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 103, 1181–1194 (2013).
Hasegawa, A., Yoshida, K. & Okada, T. Nearly complete stress drop in the 2011 MW 9.0 off the Pacific coast of Tohoku Earthquake. Earth Planets Space 63, 703–707 (2011).
Heaton, T. H. Evidence for and implications of self-healing pulses of slip in earthquake rupture. Phys. Earth Planet. Inter. 64, 1–20 (1990).
Kostrov, B. V. Self-similar problems of propagation of shear cracks. J. Appl. Math. Mech. 28, 889–898 (1964).
Burridge, R. & Knopoff, L. Model and theoretical seismicity. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 57, 341–371 (1967).
Ben-Zion, Y., Eneva, M. & Liu, Y. Large earthquake cycles and intermittent criticality on heterogeneous faults due to evolving stress and seismicity. J. Geophys. Res. 108, 2307 (2003).
Gabriel, A-A., Ampuero, J-P., Dalguer, L. A. & Mai, P. M. The transition of dynamic rupture styles in elastic media under velocity-weakening friction. J. Geophys. Res. 117, B09311 (2012).
Zheng, G. & Rice, J. R. Conditions under which velocity-weakening friction allows a self-healing versus a cracklike mode of rupture. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 88, 1466–1483 (1998).
Lykotrafitis, G., Rosakis, A. J. & Ravichandran, G. Self-healing pulse-like shear ruptures in the laboratory. Science 313, 1765–1768 (2006).
Kaneko, Y., Avouac, J. P. & Lapusta, N. Towards inferring earthquake patterns from geodetic observations of interseismic coupling. Nature Geosci. 3, 363–369 (2010).
Gerya, T. V. & Yuen, D. A. Robust characteristics method for modelling multiphase visco-elasto-plastic thermo-mechanical problems. Phys. Earth Planet. Inter. 163, 83–105 (2007).
Drucker, D. C. & Prager, W. Soil mechanics and plastic analysis of limit design. Q. Appl. Math. 10, 157–165 (1952).
Corbi, F. et al. The seismic cycle at subduction thrusts: 1. Insights from laboratory models. J. Geophys. Res. 118, 1483–1501 (2013).
van Dinther, Y. et al. The seismic cycle at subduction thrusts: Insights from seismo-thermo-mechanical models. J. Geophys. Res. 118, 6183–6202 (2013).
Thomas, M. Y., Lapusta, N., Noda, H. & Avouac, J-P. Quasi-dynamic versus fully dynamic simulations of earthquakes and aseismic slip with and without enhanced coseismic weakening. J. Geophys. Res. 119, 1986–2004 (2014).
Acknowledgements
We thank F. Corbi and F. Funiciello for comments that have helped improve the manuscript. We thank A-A. Gabriel and H. Tobin for discussions. We are grateful to A. Heuret for providing us with a GMT script to plot Fig. 1. Numerical simulations were performed on ETH cluster Brutus. R.H. was supported by the SNSF grant 200021-153524, Y.v.D. and T.G. by an ERC-ITN grant ZIP.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
All authors contributed in the design of the study. R.H. carried out, analysed and interpreted the numerical experiments, and conducted literature research. Y.v.D., T.G. and L.A.D. supervised this work. R.H. wrote the manuscript together with contributions from Y.v.D., T.G. and L.A.D. reviewed the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Supplementary information
Supplementary Information
Supplementary Information (PDF 1425 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Herrendörfer, R., van Dinther, Y., Gerya, T. et al. Earthquake supercycle in subduction zones controlled by the width of the seismogenic zone. Nature Geosci 8, 471–474 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2427
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2427
This article is cited by
-
Numerical simulation of multiscale fault systems with rate- and state-dependent friction
Computational Geosciences (2023)
-
The occurrence and hazards of great subduction zone earthquakes
Nature Reviews Earth & Environment (2022)
-
MCMC inversion of the transient and steady-state creep flow law parameters of dunite under dry and wet conditions
Earth, Planets and Space (2021)
-
The stop-start control of seismicity by fault bends along the Main Himalayan Thrust
Communications Earth & Environment (2021)
-
Structural control and system-level behavior of the seismic cycle at the Nankai Trough
Earth, Planets and Space (2020)