Introduction

Chronic heart failure (CHF), one of the major causes of mortality and morbidity worldwide,1 is the end-stage outcome of many cardiovascular diseases.2, 3 The pathophysiology of CHF includes the upregulation of: (1) neurohumoral factors, such as sympathetic nerves, the renin–angiotensin–aldosterone system4 and the growth hormone and cytokine systems;5 (2) the Klotho/FGF23 system;6 and (3) signal transduction proteins, such as the mammalian target of rapamycin.7 These diverse axes can independently influence the proliferative functions of their target organs. The most common cause of death in Western countries8 as well as in Japan9 is cancer; however, there has been no clear evidence that CHF is related to this disease. Intriguingly, recent reports have suggested that the pathophysiology and treatment of heart failure (HF) cause cancer,10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 and a retrospective cohort study demonstrated that the risk of CHF increased in patients with breast cancer after anthracycline and trastuzumab treatment.16 Furthermore, the causes of CHF and cancer can overlap; for example, diabetes mellitus can cause both cardiovascular disease17 and cancer.18 This indicates that there might be a cause and effect relationship between CHF and cancer, although this association remains unclear; it is also unknown whether CHF induces cancer or whether cancer precedes CHF. Interestingly, a recent report showed that atrial natriuretic peptide, a potential biomarker of CHF,19 decreased both cancer metastasis and the incidence of cancer.20, 21 Therefore, there is a need to investigate whether the pathophysiology of CHF induces or reduces the incidence of cancer and what types of cancer might be involved.

To investigate these issues, we consecutively enrolled patients with CHF in a retrospective study and examined the clinical profiles of and prevalence of cancer in these patients. Furthermore, we investigated the time of onset of each cancer and CHF and examined the prevalence of CHF preceding cancer onset.

Methods

Study design

This study was a retrospective, single-center, cohort study. We consecutively enrolled 5238 CHF patients who were hospitalized in the Department of Cardiovascular Medicine in our institute between 2001 and 2013, and we followed these patients until April 2015. We also obtained data from the 2008 cancer database ‘Monitoring of Cancer Incidence in Japan’ from the National Cancer Center, Japan. The patients in this database comprised the control group (controls). This study was approved by the National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center Research Ethics Committee (M27-077). The Committee decided that, according to the Japanese Clinical Research Guidelines, the acquisition of informed consent from the subjects was not required because it was a retrospective observational study. Instead, a public announcement was made in accordance with the Ethics Committee’s request and the Japanese Clinical Research Guidelines.

Study population

We verified the presence of CHF in the 5238 patients who were hospitalized in the Department of Cardiovascular Medicine in our institute from 2001 to 2013. The patient characteristics are shown in Table 1. The diagnosis of CHF was confirmed by an expert team of cardiologists using the Framingham Heart Failure Diagnostic Criteria.22 We also assessed the existence and severity of CHF using echocardiograms and plasma B-type natriuretic peptide (brain natriuretic peptide (BNP)) levels.23 In addition, careful medical histological analysis, physical examination, laboratory testing, chest X-rays, electrocardiography, complete Doppler echocardiography, coronary angiography, right heart catheterization, cardiac scintigraphy, cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging, cardiopulmonary exercise testing and polysomnography were performed in all patients to diagnose the causes of CHF. By contrast, the cancers in the CHF patient cohort had been diagnosed by researchers who specialized in the diagnosis and treatment of cancers. We confirmed the evidence of cancer in the medical records of the relevant patients. We also examined the time of onset of CHF and cancer, defined as the time of the first diagnosis of CHF and cancer, respectively, at National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center or at other specialized hospitals.

Table 1 Patients’ characteristics

We also obtained data pertaining to the prevalence of cancer in Japan from the 2008 Cancer Registry and Statistics, collected and collated legally by the Cancer Information Service of the National Cancer Center, Japan. This registry is based on the results of a nationwide survey of cancer patients (Monitoring of Cancer Incidence in Japan) that aimed to ascertain the actual rate of cancer incidence and acquire data for cancer countermeasures in Japan. We used the data from 2008 as our control group because this was the median year of the 2001–2015 timeframe of our study.

Study protocol

We determined the prevalence of cancer in the CHF patient cohort and compared it with that in all Japanese cancer patients. We also determined the prevalence of individual cancers, such as lung cancer, in these two populations. Finally, we compared the prevalence of cancer in patients whose cancer originated after the onset of CHF with that in the cancer patient control group.

Primary outcome measure

The primary outcome measure was defined as the prevalence of all cancers and the comparison of cancer incidence in CHF patients and the cancer patient control group.

Secondary outcome measure

The secondary outcome measures were defined as the prevalence of each cancer, the comparison of the incidence of each cancer in CHF patients and in the cancer patient control group. We also investigated the characteristic of CHF such as causes of CHF, plasma BNP levels, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and LV dimensions in CHF patients.

Statistical analysis

Descriptive statistics of continuous variables are presented as the mean and s.d. or as medians with the 25th and 75th percentiles, depending on the distribution of the variables. Categorical variables are presented as frequencies and percentages. The overall prevalence of cancer in patients with CHF and the prevalence for each cancer type were calculated with the 95% confidence interval (CI). To compare the prevalence rates in the CHF and non-CHF populations, the prevalence rates were adjusted for age and sex, the most common variables used for standardization, using published data from the National Cancer Center database ‘Monitoring of Cancer Incidence in Japan’. All P-values were two-sided, and a P-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. All statistical analyses were performed using the SAS Statistical Software version 9.3 for Windows (SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA).

Results

Table 1 shows the characteristics of the 5238 CHF patients. The severity of CHF was characterized by BNP levels, and LV systolic and diastolic diameters (LVDs and LVDd, respectively) and LVEF, which were determined by echocardiography at discharge. Table 2 shows that the incidence of cancer in CHF patients was higher than that in controls (overall: 2.27% vs 0.59%, P<0.0001; men: 2.12% vs 0.71%, P<0.0001; and women: 2.40% vs 0.47%, P<0.0001) after matching for sex and age. Furthermore, the incidences of stomach cancer, lung cancer, prostate cancer, breast cancer and colon cancer were higher in CHF patients than in controls. There was no correlation between the incidence of cancer and CHF etiology, although cancer incidence appeared to be higher in CHF patients with valvular heart diseases (Table 3). Table 4 shows the relationship between the incidence of cancer and CHF severity according to plasma BNP levels and LVEF; the results showed that the incidence of cancer increased as the BNP level increased but not as LVEF decreased. Intriguingly, the incidence of cancer increased as LVDd decreased. Progression of the severity of cardiovascular damage with smaller LV volume could be a clinical characteristic of CHF patients with cancer. We further examined the characteristics of CHF patients with and without cancer and found that those with cancer were older and that the prevalence of hemoglobin A1c >6.4% in CHF patients with and without cancer was 18.7% and 16.7%, respectively (P=0.464).

Table 2 Prevalence of cancers in patients with CHF
Table 3 Baseline diseases of patients with cancers
Table 4 Cancer prevalence of the CHF patients in the case of stratification in plasma BNP levels, LVEF and LVDd

Table 5 shows the characteristics of CHF patients diagnosed with CHF before cancer and CHF patients diagnosed with cancer before CHF. After eliminating those cancer patients in whom cancer was diagnosed prior to CHF, we still found a higher incidence of cancer in CHF patients than in controls (0.99% vs 0.59%, P<0.001). We found that these cancers were diagnosed at a mean duration of 8.8 years after the diagnosis of CHF.

Table 5 Characteristics of the patients with CHF and cancers

Discussion

In the present study, we demonstrated a higher prevalence of cancer in patients with CHF compared with an age- and sex-matched cancer patient control group, particularly for cancers of the stomach, lung, prostate, breast and colon; thus, we propose that there is a strong correlation between the pathophysiology of CHF and cancer. To our knowledge, this is the first report of such a correlation; however, we need to consider several issues and plausible mechanisms before reaching any firm conclusions.

Issues regarding the results and conclusions of the present study

The first issue that we need to consider is the diagnostic accuracy for CHF and cancer. If the diagnosis of either CHF or cancer were not accurate, the current results would be incorrect. For CHF, we used many modalities to reach the diagnosis, such as echocardiograms, imaging with radioisotope, computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging tests, cardiac catheterization with myocardial biopsies, physical examinations and blood examinations, which strongly indicate the very high accuracy of the diagnoses and the efficacy of CHF treatments in Japan. The cancer diagnoses in patients with CHF were also made by professionals who specialized in both the diagnosis and treatment of cancers; we checked the medical records of all patients to verify their accuracy. In addition, the diagnosis of cancer in the general Japanese population is also very accurate. A database of registered patients with cancer was created under the Cancer Control Act (Act No. 98 2006), which came into force on 1 April 2007. As a result of this Act, all cancers are precisely diagnosed in Japan and registered into the National Cancer Center database. Therefore, both the cancer and CHF databases were reliable sources to use for the present study.

The second issue was that the Japanese cohort for the control group in the present study already included patients with CHF. As a control for the CHF cohort, it would have been preferable to investigate the incidence of cancer in non-CHF subjects. Unfortunately, that particular cohort has not yet been created for the investigation of cancer incidence. In Japan, the population of CHF patients is considered to be between 0.2 and 1 million people, which corresponds to approximately 0.2–1% of the general Japanese population. Given that the incidence of cancer was higher in CHF patients than in the general Japanese population, the incidence of cancer in the non-CHF subjects should be marginally lower than the value we obtained (0.59%); this further increases the difference in the prevalence of cancer between the CHF and non-CHF populations. Thus it would be appropriate to conclude that CHF increased the incidence of cancer >3.85 times in our study population (2.27/0.59).

The third issue pertains to other comorbidities that can cause cancer in patients with CHF. Given that diabetes mellitus can cause cardiovascular disease17 and cancer,18 we checked plasma hemoglobin A1c levels; however, we found no differences in plasma hemoglobin A1c levels between CHF patients with and without cancer. Several drugs for CHF have been reported to induce cancer13, 14, 15; however, all drugs used to treat our CHF patient cohort have been approved for safety. Additionally, the rate of carcinogenesis should be too low to account for the differences between CHF patients with and without cancer and to provoke cancer over an average of 4 years (Table 5).

Finally, we found that the incidence of cancer in the stomach, lung, prostate, breast and colon was increased in the CHF cohort; however, we were unable to confirm that CHF pathophysiology was the reason why these organs were more likely to develop cancer. CHF causes low perfusion and edema in all organs, which can cause carcinogenesis. In this study, because: (1) the number of cancer patients was small; (2) the species of cancer were heterogeneous; and (3) we did not check the blood levels of neurohumoral factors, such as cytokines, that can facilitate the development and progression of each individual cancer, we hypothesize that the neurohumoral factors elevated during HF generally increase carcinogenesis. Furthermore, we only examined the cancer groups that contained more than five patients; thus, we cannot exclude the possibility that low-frequency cancers, such as ovarian cancer, are influenced by CHF.

Several possibilities that the onset of CHF may be followed by the onset of cancer

There are various mechanisms by which CHF pathophysiology could affect the onset or progression of cancer. The first is that the activation of neurohumoral factors, such as cytokines and endothelin, could affect oncogenesis. Endothelin has been reported to activate the transcription factor nuclear factor-κB,24 and the GATA-4 transcription factor25 can affect oncogenesis in remote organs via mitogen-activated protein kinase-mediated phosphorylation. Second, cancer drugs can cause HF. Indeed, trastuzumab, a drug for breast cancer, has been found to be toxic to the heart and can cause CHF.26 It has been reported that survivors of young adult cancer were at increased risk of developing cardiovascular disease.27 However, we observed an increased incidence of cancer in patients with CHF, even after excluding those patients in whom the onset of cancer preceded the onset of CHF; this suggested that the pathophysiology of CHF primed oncogenesis. This was in agreement with the results of Hasin et al.,10 who prospectively observed the onset of cancer in 961 CHF and non-CHF subjects and found a 68% increase in cancer in the CHF patients. We also observed a 68% increase in the onset of cancer in patients with CHF ((0.99–0.59)/0.59=0.68). The third possibility is the existence of common risk factors between CHF and cancer. Indeed, smoking and diabetes mellitus have been reported to be risk factors for both CHF and cancer.28 However, the percentages for comorbidity with diabetes mellitus were similar between patients with and without CHF. Conversely, there might be unknown common risk factors for both CHF and cancer. The fourth possibility is that there might be genes or foods that are related to both cancer and CHF. The fifth possibility is that, because hospitalized CHF patients undergo examinations for both cardiac function and general physical condition, cancers are diagnosed incidentally, which could contribute to the increased incidence of cancer diagnosis in CHF patients. However, even in the general population, the Japanese Government has budgeted money to examine cancer onset, suggesting that we may also accidently find cancer in non-CHF subjects as well as in CHF patients. Taken together, because we could not identify the specific mechanisms through which cancer might be primed by the pathophysiology of CHF, there is a need for further investigation.

Clinical importance

First, when we examine patients with CHF, we usually focus not only on cardiac function but also on the general condition of the patients. However, we typically only assess general conditions associated with CHF, such as renal dysfunction, pulmonary dysfunction or hepatic dysfunction. The current observation strongly supports the idea that these examinations are not sufficient and that we need to be vigilant regarding possible cancer onset in patients with CHF. Second, we hypothesize that CHF patients with cancer are likely to have more severe cardiovascular damage and a small LV. Interestingly, LVEF did not affect the incidence of cancer, suggesting that cancers could be observed in patients with HF with preserved EF. Third, we observed that the incidence of cancer in CHF patients increased as LVDd decreased, although LVEF was not significantly different between CHF patients with and without cancer. These results suggest that HF with preserved EF is associated with cancer. Although the reasons for this coincidence are not clear, one possible explanation is that modifiers of HF with preserved EF and cancers, such as aging, are similar. Finally, when we investigate CHF pathophysiology, we may also be taking a step forward in the identification of unknown oncogenesis mechanisms.

Social impacts

Although we have noted that cancer is related to the pathophysiology of CHF and that we need to be vigilant about concurrent cancer when examining CHF patients, we need to consider the present results in terms of their social impact. First, the present study could be interpreted as suggesting that cancer screening in CHF patients would be useful. However, the present retrospective study does not provide such evidence, and a prospective study is warranted because cancer screening in CHF patients might not find early-stage cancers. Second, we note that cancer screening in CHF patients might not improve the prognosis for all-cause mortality. Third, the improved prognosis that might be attributable to cancer screening in patients with CHF would not help in reducing the social burden, because such cancer screenings are not generally recommended at present. Instead, we emphasize that clinicians should always consider the possibility of cancer when examining CHF patients. Finally, before the prospective investigation of the cost-effectiveness of cancer screening in CHF patients, the conclusion of this study should not be extrapolated as a recommendation for the general practice of cancer screening in CHF patients under the present Japanese medical insurance system.

Study limitations

The present study has some limitations. First, because this study was a single-center study, the number of patients was limited, particularly, in the CHF cohort. Our hospital is a leading hospital with a high volume of CHF patients, and we have a database of >8000 CHF patients with precise information on the etiology and severity of their CHF. Nevertheless, we cannot analyze the incidence of rare cancers in our database of CHF patients. To resolve this, we suggest testing the present hypothesis using larger multicenter trials. Second, although most of our patients came from the area near Osaka, where our hospital is located, we also enrolled patients from all over Japan because our hospital is the only institution that specializes in cardiovascular diseases and HF. By contrast, the cancer database comprised subjects from all over the country. These differences in residency could also affect the quantitative results of the present study. However, we Japanese are relatively homogenous in terms of our living style and genetics. In addition, we were not able to exclude the data of CHF patients who were also diagnosed with cancer from the 2008 Japanese cancer database, which might have underestimated but not overestimated the number of patients in our cohort who had cancer with concurrent CHF. Finally, based on the data in this study, we were unable to determine the cause and effect relationship between CHF and cancer; thus further research is required to this end.

Clinical perspectives

We observed increased cancer onset in patients with CHF, which suggests that the pathophysiology of CHF primes the oncogenesis process.

Given that CHF might prime the onset of cancers, we should be vigilant regarding cancer comorbidity in patients with CHF.

Translational perspectives

Both CHF and cancer are among the most frequent causes of death in developed countries. Given that CHF modulates the activation of neurohumoral factors, such as cytokines, the pathophysiology of CHF could prime the onset or progression of cancer. We found that the incidence of cancer in CHF patients was approximately four times higher than that in control patients after adjustments for age and sex. The most frequent cancers in CHF patients were stomach, lung, prostate, breast and colon cancers. Thus we propose that there is a strong correlation between the pathophysiology of CHF and cancer.