Article | Open

24-hour-restraint stress induces long-term depressive-like phenotypes in mice

  • Scientific Reports 6, Article number: 32935 (2016)
  • doi:10.1038/srep32935
  • Download Citation
Received:
Accepted:
Published online:

Abstract

There is an increasing risk of mental disorders, such as acute stress disorder (ASD), post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and depression among survivors who were trapped in rubble during earthquake. Such long-term impaction of a single acute restraint stress has not been extensively explored. In this study, we subjected mice to 24-hour-restraint to simulate the trapping episode, and investigated the acute (2 days after the restraint) and long-term (35 days after the restraint) impacts. Surprisingly, we found that the mice displayed depression-like behaviors, decreased glucose uptake in brain and reduced adult hippocampal neurogenesis 35 days after the restraint. Differential expression profiling based on microarrays suggested that genes and pathways related to depression and other mental disorders were differentially expressed in both PFC and hippocampus. Furthermore, the depression-like phenotypes induced by 24-hour-restraint could be reversed by fluoxetine, a type of antidepressant drug. These findings demonstrated that a single severe stressful event could produce long-term depressive-like phenotypes. Moreover, the 24-hour-restraint stress mice could also be used for further studies on mood disorders.

Introduction

Natural disasters, such as earthquakes, not only lead to great devastation and enormous deaths and injuries, but also pose psychological consequences to people1. Survivors from the disaster are more likely to develop stress-related disorders, including ASD, PTSD, substance abuse and depression2,3,4,5,6. Over the two decades, studies about depression after a disaster have demonstrated that the prevalence of depression range from 4.9% to 54%, persisting for weeks, months or even years7. Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies showed the connectivity among prefrontal-limbic systems was increased but limbic-striatal areas and default-mode areas were attenuated in earthquake survivors8. Another study found the white matter microstructure in right prefrontal lobe and parahippocampus was decreased after less than a month of the earthquake9. These reports showed that traumatic experiences could affect the fronto-limbic network involved in emotion regulation. However, most researches about mental health of earthquake survivors largely relied on surveys and neuroimaging studies, which could not reveal the specific biological mechanism of how traumatic experience about earthquake leads to mood disorders.

Various risk factors of mood disorders (like PTSD or depression) in survivors after the earthquake have been investigated, and some studies have demonstrated that being trapped in the earthquake is a strong or even the strongest risk factor of mental disorders1,3,7,10. Based on these results, we decided to subject mice to 24 hours restraint to mimic the situation victims being trapped under the rubble. Restraint is commonly used to stress animals11. Previous studies have revealed that body temperature, arterial pressure, heart rate and serum corticosterone levels were increased during/after acute restraint stress12,13. In contrast, aggressive conflicts, motor activity and exploration were generally found decreased among stressed animals13,14. Acute stress could also induce dendritic remodeling and reduce phosphorylated cofilin in medial prefrontal cortex15. Moreover, alternations of immune, neurogenesis, cognition and memory in restraint animals also indicated multiple influences of acute stress on immunity system and neuronal plasticity16,17,18. However, the long-term impact of a single severe restraint stress has not been extensively explored.

In this study, we subjected mice to 24 hours restraint to simulate the episode survivors trapped under collapsed buildings after an earthquake. Both behavioral and molecular changes were investigated to reveal the acute (2 days after the restraint) and long-term (5 weeks after the restraint) impact of the 24-hour-restraint. Interestingly, we found that the 24-hour-restraint stress could produce long-term depressive-like phenotypes, which could be reversed by fluoxetine, a type of antidepressant drug. The 24-hour-restraint stress mice could also be used as a feasible mouse model for further studies on mood disorders, like PTSD or depression.

Result

Depressive-like behaviors induced by 24-hour restraint

Mice were subjected to 24 hours restraint to simulate the episode victims being trapped. During the restraint, we ensured that the mice’s bodies and hindquarters could not move or turn around, but their head and anterior limb could move. And the mice had no access to food and water. The details of restraint procedure are described in Methods and the apparatus and illustrations of the restraint are shown in Supplementary Figure S1.

To study the impact of the restraint, we measured the corticosterone (CORT) level in serum at different time points during the 24-hour-restraint. As a result, the CORT was immediately elevated at 1 hour after the beginning of the restraint, and reached to ~2 fold at the end of the restraint (Supplementary Figure S2). After 24 hours’ recovery, the CORT level went back to the normal level. Previous studies also showed that acute stress would activate the hypothalamus-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis, producing a transient increase of CORT in rodent19. Besides, significant body weight loss (26.7%) was found in the restraint mice immediately after the 24-hour-restraint (Supplementary Figure S3), largely as a result of the deprivation of food and water. The body weight returned to the normal level after one day’s recovery. However, it showed a slight (3.4%) but significant weight gain 35 days after the restraint (Supplementary Figure S3). These results suggested the 24-hour-restraint is a strong acute stress.

In order to distinguish the short-term and long-term effects of the restraint on animals’ behaviors, we separated mice into two groups (S group and L group) (Fig. 1A). Behavioral tests on S group were carried out at 2 days after the restraint, while behavioral tests on L group were performed at 35 days after the restraint. Before the 24-hour-restraint, we conducted sucrose preference test to measure the level of experiencing pleasure. As a result, there’s no difference of sucrose preference between the unrestraint mice and the control before the 24-hour-restraint (Supplementary Figures S4 and S5). However, after the restraint, mice displayed a decreased sucrose preference than the controls in both S group and L group (Fig. 1B,C). These results suggested the restraint mice lack reactivity to pleasure, known as anhedonia, which is a core symptom of depression20. In the forced swimming test, a measure of behavioral despair, reduced latency to abandon and increased immobility were found in the restraint mice for both S group (Fig. 1D) and L group (Fig. 1E). Moreover, we carried out the contextual fear-conditioning (CFC) test to assess the fear memory. There was no difference in freezing time between the restraint and the control mice in S group (Fig. 1F). Interestingly, the restraint mice exhibited less freezing time in L group (Fig. 1G). Previous study also reported that animals exposed to chronic stress showed deficits in learning and cognition flexibility21. The CFC tests indicated that the 24-hour restraint could induce abnormal cognition function and the visible abnormality occurred after long-time accumulation.

Figure 1: The 24-hour-restraint stress induced depressive-like behaviors.
Figure 1

(A) Experiment designs to test the short-term (S group) and long-term (L group) impact of the restraint on mice. (B–C) Sucrose preference percentage of 24 hours in sucrose preference test of S group (B) and L group (C). The p-value (t-test) for S group is <0.05 (N = 24 vs. 25) and L group is <0.05 (N = 23 vs. 25). (D–E) The struggling time before the first abandon and total time of immobility in the forced swimming test of S group (D) and L group (E). The p-values of t-test of first abandon are <0.05 (N = 24 vs. N = 25) and <0.01(N = 25 vs. 28) respectively. And the p-values of t-test of immobility are <0.01 (N = 24 vs. N = 25) and <0.01 (N = 26 vs. 28) respectively. (F,G) The percentage of freezing time in the contextual fear conditioning test for the S group (F) and L group (G). The p-values of t-test are 0.30 (N = 21 vs. 23) and <0.001 (N = 20 vs. 21) respectively. Data are presented as mean ± SEM, *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001.

Furthermore, in other mood- and cognition- related behavioral tests, including open field test (OFT), elevated plus maze (EPM), social interaction test (SIT) and prepulse inhibition (PPI) test, we found no significant difference between restraint and control animals in both S group and L group (Supplementary Figure S6 and S7).

These findings implied that the 24-hour-restraint could induce depressive-like phenotypes, and the effects of the stress on behaviors were long lasting. More importantly, some defects (like cognitive memory) may be only visible after long-time accumulation of abnormal biological changes.

Alternation of glucose uptake of brain revealed by PET

Neurons account for the majority energy consumption of brain, therefore the dynamic changes of energy demand reflex the alteration in neuronal activation, which can be measured by18 F-fuoro-2-deoxyglucose (FDG)-PET scanning22. Hence we checked the brain glucose metabolism by small-animal PET scanning (Fig. 2A). In S group, the glucose uptake of specific brain regions were increased in restraint mice, including striatum (STR), cortex (CTX), basal forebrain/septum (BS), left amygdala (LAMY), superior colliculus (SC), olfactory areas (OLF) and right inferior colliculus (RIC) (Fig. 2C). However the average glucose uptake of the whole brain showed no significant difference (Fig. 3B). While in L group, it was significantly decreased in the restraint mice (Fig. 2D). The brain regions with decreased glucose uptake consist of STR, CTX, SC and IC, which were increased in the S group. In addition, brain regions including hippocampal region (HIP), thalamus (THA), cingulate gyrus (CG) and midbrain (MID) were also found to display decreased glucose uptake in L group (Fig. 2E). Our results showed that 24-hour-restraint could alter the glucose uptake of brain, differently in short term and long term.

Figure 2: Alternations of glucose metabolism by small animal PET scanning.
Figure 2

Glucose uptake is measured as %ID/cc (%injected dose per mL of tissue). (A) Experiment design of the PET scanning. (B) The average glucose uptake of the whole brain of S group shows no difference between control and restraint mice (N = 7 vs. 9). (C) The changes of glucose uptake in brain regions of S group. Glucose uptake of brain regions including STR, CTX, BFS, LAMY, SC, OLF, RIC is significantly increased in restraint mice. (D) The average glucose uptake of the whole brain for L group is significantly decreased in restraint mice (N = 8 vs. N = 7), p value of student t-test is<0.01. (E) The glucose uptake of different brain regions of L group. Brain regions such as STR, CTX, HIP, THA, CG, SC, MID and IC were significantly decreased in restraint mice. (F) Representatives of the glucose uptake of S and L group. Data are presented as mean ± SEM, *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01. Abbreviations: RSTR, right striatum; LSTR, left striatum; CTX, cortex; RHIP, right hippocampal region; LHIP, left hippocampal region; THA, thalamus; CB, cerebellum; BFS, basal forebrain/septum; HYP, hypothalamus; RAMY, right amygdala; LAMY, left amygdala; CG, cingulate gyrus; SC, superior colliculus; OLF, olfactory areas; RMID, right midbrain; LMID, left midbrain; LIC, left inferior colliculus; RIC, right inferior colliculus.

Figure 3: Effects of the 24-hour-restraint stress on adult neurogenesis.
Figure 3

(A) Representative staining of BrdU (green), Ki67 (red) and DAPI (blue) in DG of hippocampus. (B–C) The numbers of BrdU+ (B) and Ki67+ (C) cells of S group display no difference between control and restraint mice. The p-values are 0.76 (N = 6 vs. 7) and 0.61 (N = 4 vs. 4) respectively. (D–E) The numbers of BrdU+ (D) and Ki67+ (E) cells of L group are decreased in the restraint mice. The p-values are <0.01 (N = 7 vs. 7) and <0.05 (N = 4 vs. 4) respectively. Data are presented as mean ± SEM, *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01.

Decreased adult neurogenesis in long-term dentate gyrus

In the last decade, there are increasing evidences demonstrating the important role of adult hippocampal neurogenesis in the pathogenesis and therapeutics of depression23,24. Since our results above demonstrated that the 24-hour-restraint mice exhibited depressive-like behaviors, we examined whether the 24-hour-restraint stress had an influence on adult hippocampal neurogenesis. Both BrdU and Ki67 were employed to label the newborn neurons (Fig. 3A), and BrdU was injected 3 times during the 24-hour restraint. In S group, there was no significant difference of BrdU-positive cells in dentate gyrus (DG) between the restraint and the control mice (Fig. 3B) as well as Ki67-positve cells (Fig. 3C). However, in L group, we found significant reduction of cell survival by BrdU labeling (Fig. 3D) and decreased cell proliferation by Ki67 labeling (Fig. 3E). These results demonstrated that the impact of 24-hour-restaint on adult hippocampal neurogenesis was long lasting.

Differential expression profiling of the restraint mice

Neuroimaging studies of major depression on humans and animal models have identified abnormalities in prefrontal cortex (PFC) and hippocampus25,26,27. Decreased volume of hippocampus and PFC has been reported among patients suffering depression26,27. These two brain regions have been intensively studied with regard to stress, depression and antidepressant actions28.

In order to reveal the underlying molecular mechanism, we measured the gene profiles of the hippocampus and PFC of mice in S group and L group (N = 3 in each condition and N = 3*4 = 12 totally) by expression microarrays. We carried out differential expression analysis among each group. As a result, in the PFC, we detected 439 differentially expressed genes (DEGs, p-value < 0.05 and fold change>2) for S group experiment and 85 DEGs for L group experiment (Fig. 4A), indicating the effect of the restraint on the PFC declined after 5 weeks. In contrast, in the hippocampus, we detected 130 DEGs for S group experiment but more (255) DEGs in L group experiment (Fig. 4A). This suggested gene expressions of the hippocampus undergo dramatic changes after 5 weeks of the restraint. Moreover, few overlapped DEGs were found between S group experiments and L group experiments of the same tissues (Fig. 4B), further demonstrating the long-term changes after the restraint differed from short-term changes.

Figure 4: High-throughput gene expression analysis in short-term (S) and long-term (L) brain tissues (PFC and hippocampus) by microarrays.
Figure 4

(A) Number of detected differentially expressed genes (DEGs). (B) Number of overlapping DEGs among short-term PFC, long-term PFC, short-term hippocampus and long-term hippocampus. (C) Enriched KEGG pathways revealed by the DEGs. Enrichments from up-regulated DEGs and down-regulated DEGs are shown in “red” and “green” respectively. (D–E). Fold changes of selected genes in PFC (D) and hippocampus (E) of S group measured by quantitative RT-PCR. F-G. Fold changes of selected genes in PFC (F) and hippocampus (G) of L group. Data are presented as mean ± SEM, *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001.

In addition, enrichment analysis based on KEGG pathways29 and Gene Ontology (GO)30 annotations were carried out (Fig. 4C, Supplementary Table S1 and S2). Interestingly, neuroactive ligand-receptor interaction pathway was enriched in down-regulated DEGs in PFC of S group. And it was also enriched in up-regulated DEGs in both PFC and hippocampus of L group. Besides, MAPK signaling pathway, endocytosis, antigen processing and presentation pathway were down-regulated and gap junction was up-regulated in both PFC and hippocampus of L group. We carried out quantitative real time PCR (qPCR) to verify expression changes of genes involved in neuroactive ligand-receptor interaction pathway (including Drd1a, Drd2, Adora2a and Htr1d, Nmbr). As a result, Drd1a, Adora2a and Htr1d gene expressions were significantly increased in PFC of L groups (Fig. 4F) but were decreased in PFC of S group (Fig. 4D). Drd2 and Nmbr gene expressions were also up-regulated in PFC of L group but had no changes in S group (Fig. 4D). In addition, in the long-term hippocampus, Drd1a and Htr1d gene expressions were increased (Fig. 4G) but no difference were found in the short-term hippocampus (Fig. 4E). As is known, the dopamine D1 receptor31, D2 receptor32, the adenosine A2A receptor31 and serotonin receptors33,34 have long been associated with anxiety disorders.

Moreover, GO enrichment suggested decreased myelination (including Plp1, Mbp, Ugt8a and Ermn) of PFC and hippocampus in L group (Table S2), which were also verified by qPCR experiments (Fig. 4F,G). But there were no significant changes in S group (Fig. 4D,E). These signaling pathways and differentially expressed genes might underline the possible molecular mechanisms involved in the depressive-like phenotypes induced by the 24-hour-restraint and need further exploration.

Reversal of depressive-like phenotypes by fluoxetine treatment

The 24-hour restraint mice showed depressive-like behaviors and we wondered if these behaviors could be reversed with antidepressant. Fluoxetine (flx) is a classical serotonin selective reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) antidepressant and is widely used for therapy of depression35. It is also effective in the treatment of PTSD36. We administrated fluoxetine to mice for 5 weeks (Fig. 5A) since 2 days after the restraint and conducted similar behavioral tests mentioned above. Firstly, the sucrose preference of the restraint mice treated with fluoxetine was significantly enhanced (Fig. 5B). Secondly, the latency to first immobility and duration of immobility in the forced swim test were also increased in the restraint mice treated with fluoxetine (Fig. 5C,D). Thirdly, the decreased freezing time in restraint mice was also reversed by fluoxetine treatment (Fig. 5E). In addition, after five weeks fluoxetine treatment, increased generation of new granule neurons were found in DG of the restraint mice (Fig. 5F), similar to findings of previous researches that chronic fluoxetine treatment could increase neurogenesis in adult hippocampus37. We further inspected the ATP abundance in the brain, as previous research suggested low ATP abundance in the brain was associated with depressive-like behaviors38. Notably, we found the concentration of ATP was decreased in PFC (student t-test, p < 0.05) and hippocampus (student t-test, p < 0.05) in the restraint mice compared to controls and this decrease could be reversed with fluoxetine treatment (Fig. 5G,H). In summary, the depression-like phenotypes induced by 24-hour-restraint could be reversed by chronic fluoxetine treatment.

Figure 5: Fluoxetine treatment reverses the depressive-like phenotypes induced by 24-hour-restraint.
Figure 5

(A) Experiment design in order to test the effect of fluoxetine (flx) treatment. (B) The sucrose consumption in the sucrose preference test. (2-way ANOVA, stress × durg: p < 0.01, drug: p = 0.03; stress: p < 0.01, N = C:23, R:28, flx-C:28, flx-R:28). (C) The struggling time before the first abandon in the forced swim test (2-way ANOVA, stress×durg: p = 0.2271; drug: p = 0.092; stress: p < 0.01; N = C:30, R:30, flx-C:29, flx-R:30). (D) The total time of immobility in the forced swim test (2-way ANOVA, stress×durg: p < 0.01; drug: p = 0.095; stress: p < 0.05, N = C:30, R:30, flx-C:29, flx-R:30). (E) The percentage of freezing in the fear condition test (2-way ANOVA, stress × durg: p = 0.25; drug: p < 0.001; stress: p < 0.01, N = C:30, R:30, flx-C:29, flx-R:27). (F) The number of Brdu+ cells (2-way ANOVA, stress × durg: p = 0.62; drug: p < 0.01; stress: p = 0.09, N = C:4, R:4, flx-C:3, flx-R:3). (G,H) Changes of ATP concentration level in the PFC (G) (2-way ANOVA, stress × durg: p = 0.945; drug: p < 0.05; stress: p = 0.436, N = 5 for each group) and hippocampus (H) (2-way ANOVA, stress × durg: p < 0.01; drug: p = 0.25; stress: p = 0.73, N = 5 for each group). The asterisks in the figures showed the significant interactions of subgroups detected by post-hoc tests (Tukey Honest Significant Differences): *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001. Data are presented as mean ± SEM.

Discussion

Recent studies suggested being trapped in an earthquake is one of the strongest risks for depression7, PTSD10 and ASD1. And a number of studies showed the psychiatric symptoms after earthquakes were long lasting, even for years7. However, there were few studies targeting on the biological mechanism by using animal model to investigate the impact of stressors related to the earthquake. In our study, we developed 24-hour-restraint mice to simulate the situation of being trapped in an earthquake and found striking depressive-like behaviors and molecular changes. Our study is the first attempt to revel the impact of the 24-hour-restraint condition on mouse model. In our mouse model, we found the impaction of 24-hour-restraint stress on behaviors was long-lasting, and some depressive-like changes (like abnormal cognition function revealed by fear conditioning and the decreased glucose uptake in the brain) are protracted, which was also consistent with previous findings that only a few of acute stress reaction appeared in earthquake victims within 48 hours after the earthquake and the major abnormalities occurred in the following week39. Furthermore, several brain regions (STR, CTX, SC and IC) displayed increased glucose uptake in short-term group (48 hours after restraint) and decreased glucose uptake in long-term group (35 days after restraint) by small-animal PET scanning. Considering that there is a delay-action stage of response to stress, the hyperactive glucose metabolism in short-term group might be a temporary acute response to the 24-hour-restraint stress, and the hypoactive glucose metabolism of most brain regions (STR, CTX, SC, IC, HIP, THA, CG and MID) in long-term group presented the long-lasting alterations caused by the 24-hour-restraint stress. Decreasing glucose uptake in cortico-limbic circuitry (as we found in L group experiment) was also found in people with major depressive disorder (MDD)40 and PTSD41. The results suggested that the dysfunction of cortico-limbic structures might impair the modulation of stress response.

In addition, several differentially expressed genes induced by the 24-hour-restraint were verified by qPCR. The up-regulated genes in long-term PFC and hippocampus, including Drd242 and Adora2a43, had already been recognized and targeted for therapies in schizophrenia, suggesting their specific roles in the pathological process of mental disorders. Besides, genes related to myelination (Mbp, Plp1, Ugt8a and Ernm) were found decreased in long-term PFC and long-term hippocampus in our study. Expression level of Plp1 was decreased in MMD patients44 and expression of Mbp was reduced in schizophrenia patients45. Moreover, a previous microarray study also found genes involved in myelination or structural components of myelin were down-regulated in MDD patients46. Although we found several signaling pathways and differentially expressed genes (DEGs) might be involved in the response to the 24-hour-restraint stress, the underlying mechanisms are multifactorial and complex, and the specific roles of these DEGs in the generation of depressive-like behaviors are still unclear and need further exploration. Future studies may focus on these DEGs and related pathways, aiming to reveal the underlying molecular mechanisms.

Previous studies have proved that adult neurogenesis in hippocampus plays an important role in the pathogenesis of mental disorders47,48 and the regulation of response to stress23,49. Attenuation of adult-born hippocampal granule neurons could develop depressive actions50,51. Chronic stress is known to reduce neurogenesis52, while the effect of acute stress is somewhat ambiguous. Some studies suggested that acute restraint stress suppressed the generation of new neurons53,54, while other works acclaimed no changes of proliferation55,56. An interesting finding was that the cell proliferation was reduced after immobilization for 1 hour and returned to basal level after one day’s recovery compared with controls54, suggesting there exists a quick self-balancing capability of adult neurogenesis in response to acute stress. This may be one of the reasons that there is no significant difference about adult neurogenesis between restraint and control mice in short-term group. A recent study found that there was an increased hippocampal cell proliferation in dorsal hippocampus, not ventral hippocampus after 3 hours immobilization57, indicating the different roles of ventral and dorsal hippocampus in modulating response to stress. In contrast, another research showed that acute social defeat stress reduced cell survival of adult newborn hippocampal cells without altering the acute proliferation58. In our mice model, 24-hour-restraint did not influence the short-term proliferation and survival of adult-born granule cells but inhibited the long-term proliferation and survival of neural cells. These results indicated that the impact of the 24-hour-restraint stress on neurogenesis is time-lapse rather than immediately reacted on the brain. The complex results of acute stress on adult neurogenesis may attribute to the different manipulations to animals, stressors and animal species, and the specific reasons still need further study.

During the past decades, numerous animal models have been established to investigate the neurobiological process of mood disorders, such as depression59,60 and PTSD61, and also to test novel therapeutic drugs. In this paper, we established a new animal model by using 24-hour-restraint condition. The construction procedure of the 24-hour-restraint stress is simple. After 24-hours-restraint, mice were housed in the regular condition, and the mice displayed long-term depressive-like phenotypes 35 days after the restraint. Furthermore, the depressive-like phenotypes of restraint mice are reversed by chronic administrating SSRI drug fluoxetine. Though the modeling process is very much like to build a PTSD model, the restraint mice showed no anxiety-like behaviors (measured by open field test and elevated plus maze), which is a characteristic feature of PTSD62. Instead, core depressive-like behaviors (anhedonia and despair) were observed. However, it is also known that comorbid conditions of PTSD and depression are widespread in disaster survivors63,64, and the depressive-like phenotypes exist both in the PTSD and depression animal models59,62. Therefore, the 24-hour-restraint mice may be used for further studies on mood disorders.

Materials and methods

Animals

Adult male C57/BL6 mice (12 weeks old) were obtained from Model Animal Research Center (MARC) of Nanjing University (Nanjing, China). Mice were housed in groups (N = 5) in standard cages and allowed to acclimate for 7 days before experiments. The mice were kept on a 12h: 12h cycle (lights on at 7:00 a.m.) in a temperature-controlled room maintained at 25 °C with free access to food and water. In this study, different groups of animals were used for the behavioral tests, the PET scan, the post mortem histology and the microarray analysis. All animal experiments were approved by the University Committee on Animal Care and Use of Shanghai Jiao Tong University and conducted in accordance with the approved guidelines.

Procedure of the 24-hour restraint

The mouse was placed in a ventilated clear plastic tube (3cm in diameter and 10cm in length) and subjected for 24 hours restraint from 10:00 a.m. to 10:00 a.m. of the next day, kept in dark with a background noise by the air-conditioning vents. The holes (0.5 cm in diameter) in the head and along the sidewall of the tune enabled air flowing. Animals could move head and anterior limb, but the body and hindquarters were not able to move or turn around. During the restraint, the animals had no access to food and water. Once the restraint ended, mice were put back to their home cages immediately, with access to food and water freely. Non-restraint mice (control group) remained in the home cages until behavioral experiments started.

Drug administration

The fluoxetine hydrochloride (J.Huan Chemical Company, Shanghai, China) was dissolved in drinking water with a light-protected bottle. Solutions were prepared freshly everyday with concentration of 0.08 mg/mL, according to the volume of daily water intake of mice to reach approximately 20 mg/kg per day’s dosing. The treatment of fluoxetine was continued for 5 weeks two days after the 24-hour restraint, and throughout all behavioral tests until the mice were sacrificed.

Sucrose preference test (SPT)

Sucrose preference test was conducted according to a modified protocol described by Snyder, J.S. et al.50. Briefly, in the adaptation period, mice were individually housed and provided two bottles, containing water and 2% sucrose solution (Vetec, Sigma-Aldrich), respectively. The positions of two bottles were exchanged each 24 hours. After 3 days of habituation, the sucrose preference was first accessed by a pre-SPT to ensure the animals’ preference of sucrose were normal, and mice with preference of sucrose under 65% were considered as anhedonia and would not be used65. Water was removed at 4:00 p.m. the day before the sucrose preference test and after 17 hours water deprivation, mice were given access to two bottles containing water and 2% sucrose solution, respectively. The positions of two bottles were exchanged 12 hours later and the consumption of water or sucrose was measured by weighting the bottles at 24h later. After the 24-hour restraint, SPTs of the short and long term groups were also measured as like as the pre-SPT.

Forced swimming

The forced swimming test was performed in a clear glass cylinder (19.5cm in height, 14.5cm in diameter), filled with water (25 ± 1 °C). The test lasted for 5min in a dim environment. Latency to abandon was scored as the duration from the time when animal was introduced into the water pool, to the first moment of complete immobility (at least 2 seconds long). Parameters of floating behavior were defined as immobility with only occasional slight movements required for keeping the body balanced and the nose above water66.

Contextual fear-conditioning

All animals were allowed to adapt to the experimental room for at least 1 hour before the test. Each test consisted of a training phase and a testing phase. During the training phase, mice were individually placed into the conditioning chamber and allowed to explore for 2 min. The mice were given three shocks (0.75 mA intensity) at 1-min intervals and then returned to their home cages. Training chambers were cleaned with 75% ethanol solution before and after each trial to avoid any olfactive cues. Twenty-four hours after training, mice were placed back into the same conditioning chamber that was used during training for 5 min, and freezing behavior during the 5 min re-exposure to the fear-conditioning chamber was scored.

Small-animal positron emission tomography (PET) scanning

The small-animal PET scanning was conducted at 2 days and 35 days after restraint. Mice were treated with intraperitoneal injection of 200–300 μCi of 18-fluoro-6-deoxy-glucose (18F-FDG) after 48h fasting. After 60min of 18F-FDG uptake, mice were anesthetized with isoflurane. Images were obtained after 10-15min scanning by a prototype-dedicated small-animal positron emission tomography (PET; Trans-PET BioCaliburn LH system) scanner developed at the Xie Laboratory, HUST67. More details can be found in the supplementary methods.

Immunohistochemistry

BrdU (Sigma, USA) was intraperitoneally (i.p.) injected with a dose of 100 mg per kg body weight three times during the 24-hour restraint. Animals were deeply anesthetized, then perfused through the heart with 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) in PBS (pH 7.4). Brains were removed from the skull, postfixed in 4% PFA for 24h at 4 °C, and dehydration in 30% sucrose in PBS solution for 24–48 h until sunk to the bottom. Coronal brain sections were obtained by a cryostat (CM3050 S, Leica) at 40 μm and every six sections were collected in one well. For BrdU staining, the DNA was denatured for 30 min at 37 °C with 2 M HCl, neutralized by 10 min with 0.1 M borate buffer (pH 8.5), then washed with PBS (pH 7.4) three times for 10min. Sections were blocked by 5% goat serum in PBS solution containing 0.3% TritonX-100 (PBST) to prevent non-specific bindings. Then the sections were incubated with the primary antibodies: rat anti-BrdU (1:500, Abcam), rabbit anti-Ki67 (1:50, Millipore) overnight at 4 °C in a humiliated box. After washed with PBS three times of 10min, secondary antibodies, 488 anti-rat (1:500) and 594 anti-rabbit (1:500) (Invitrogen life technologies), were reacted for 2 hours at room temperature and followed with DAPI (Sigma-Aldrich). The numbers of BrdU- and Ki67- positive cells in DG were counted from images obtained under a Leica confocal microscope.

Microarray

RNA was extracted from prefrontal cortex and hippocampus tissues using the TRIzol® Reagent (Invitrogen Life Technologies) and clean-up by RNasey Mini Kit (Qiagen p/n 74104). RNA was quantified using a NanoDrop ND-1000 and assessed for integrity and gDNA contamination by denaturing agarose gel electrophoresis. The cDNA was generated and labeled by Quick Amp Labeling Kit, One-Color (Agilent p/n 5190-0442) and then hybridization by using Agilent Gene Expression Hybridization Kit (Agilent p/n 5188-5242). Samples were scanning with Agilent Microarray Scanner (Agilent p/n G2565BA). Each mouse was run as an individual to preserve the within-group variability (N = 3 mice per group). Quantile normalization and subsequent data processing were performed using the GeneSpring GX v11.5.1 software package (Agilent Technologies). Probes that passed quality control were filtered for expression before statistical tests (18 948 probes). Pairwise comparisons between conditions were performed with student’s t-test, differentially expressed genes were considered with p < 0.05 and fold change>2 based on the Volcano Plot. Significant differential expressed genes were subjected to pathway analysis and GO analysis based on Genespring to identify their specific biological process or functions.

Real-Time quantitative PCR (qPCR) verification

Total RNA was purified from the mouse PFC and hippocampus using the PureLink™ RNA Mini Kit (Invitrogen, USA) and reverse transcribed into cDNA using the PrimeScript™ RT reagent Kit (Takara Bio Inc., Japan). The transcripts were amplified using the ABI 7500 Real-Time PCR system (Applied Biosystems) by SYBR™ Fast qPCR Mix (Takara Bio Inc., Japan). Fold changes of expression of genes of interest were normalized to GAPDH endogenous reference gene and then normalized to control samples, and calculated using the ΔΔCt method68. The primers used for qPCR were shown as following. Adenosine A2A receptor (Adora2a): 5′-CTGCAGAACGTCACCAACTT-3′ (forward) and 5′-CCATTGTACCGGAGTGGAAT-3′ (reverse); Dopamine receptor D2 (Drd2): 5′-ACTCAAGGGCAACTGTACCC-3′ (forward) and 5′-TAGACCGTGGTGGGATGGAT-3′ (reverse); Dopamine receptor D1 (Drd1a): 5′-CAGATCGGGCATTTGGAGAGA-3′ (forward) and 5′-GGTCCCTAGATTCCCCAAGG-3′ (reverse); 5-hydroxytryptamine (serotonin) receptor 1D (Htr1d): 5′-CGTGGAATAGCTGCTGAGTT-3′ (forward) and 5′-TGGAAGCTCTGAGGTGTTTG-3′ (reverse); Neuromedin-B receptor (Nmbr): 5′-TGGGTGGTCTCTGTGTTGTT-3′ (forward) and 5′-CCGTGTCTCCATCTGCTTT-3′ (reverse); Myelin basic protein (Mbp): 5′-CAGCACCACTCTTGAACACC-3′ (forward) and 5′-GTCCCATTGTTCTGGATCGC-3′ (reverse); Proteolipid protein (myelin) 1 (Plp1): 5′-TGTTGTATGGCTCCTGGTGT-3′ (forward) and 5′-ACGCAGCAATAAACAGGTGG-3′ (reverse); UDP galactosyltransferase 8A (Ugt8a): 5′-AAGGACGCGCTATGAAGTCT-3′ (forward) and 5′-GCCGATGCTAGTGTCTTGAA-3′ (reverse); Ermin, ERM-like protein (Ermn): 5′-TCCGAGAAGGGCATCCGT-3′ (forward) and 5′-AACCCCAGCCATTCGATTTC-3′ (reverse); Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (Gapdh): 5′-TGACGTGCCGCCTGGAGAAAC-3′ (forward) and 5′-CCGGCATCGAAGGTGGAAGAG-3′ (reverse).

ATP level determination

The extraction of ATP from freshly tissues was performed according to a phenol–TE extraction protocol69. The ATP levels were determined using a bioluminescent ATP assay kit (FF2000, Promega) following the manufacturer’s instructions.

Statistical analysis

All results are presented as means ± SEM. For all experiments, student’s t test, two-way or three-way ANOVAs with or without repeated-measure were applied as appropriate. Significant interactions were further detected by unpaired t-test/two-way ANOVA + Holm-Bonferroni correction or Tukey Honest Significant Differences test. All data were analyzed with R.

Additional Information

How to cite this article: Chu, X. et al. 24-hour-restraint stress induces long-term depressive-like phenotypes in mice. Sci. Rep. 6, 32935; doi: 10.1038/srep32935 (2016).

References

  1. 1.

    , , , & Acute stress reactions and associated factors in the help-seekers after the L’Aquila earthquake. Psychopathology 46, 120–130 (2013).

  2. 2.

    , , & Prevalence of mental disorders and suicidal thoughts among community-dwelling elderly adults 3 years after the Niigata-Chuetsu earthquake. Journal of Epidemiology 21, 144–150 (2011). at

  3. 3.

    , & Traumatic stress responses in earthquake survivors in Turkey. Journal of traumatic stress 15, 269–276 (2002).

  4. 4.

    , , , & Mental health problems among the survivors in the hard-hit areas of the Yushu earthquake. PLoS ONE 7, e46449 (2012).

  5. 5.

    , & Marked increase in substance use among young people after L’Aquila earthquake. European child & adolescent psychiatry 20, 429–430 (2011). at .

  6. 6.

    et al. Acute stress-related psychological impact in children following devastating natural disaster, the Sikkim earthquake (2011), India. J Neurosci Rural Pract 4, S19–S23 (2013).

  7. 7.

    , , , & A meta-analysis of risk factors for depression in adults and children after natural disasters. Bmc Public Health 14, 623 (2014).

  8. 8.

    et al. High-field MRI reveals an acute impact on brain function in survivors of the magnitude 8.0 earthquake in China. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 106, 15412–15417 (2009).

  9. 9.

    et al. Impact of acute stress on human brain microstructure: An MR diffusion study of earthquake survivors. Hum Brain Mapp 34, 367–373 (2013).

  10. 10.

    & Over-time changes in PTSD and depression among children surviving the 1999 Istanbul earthquake. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry 18, 384–391 (2009).

  11. 11.

    & Restraint stress in biobehavioral research: Recent developments. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 33, 1089–1098 (2009).

  12. 12.

    , , , & Induction and habituation of immediate early gene expression in rat brain by acute and repeated restraint stress. J. Neurosci. 14, 5929–5938 (1994).

  13. 13.

    , , , & Behavioral and autonomic responses to acute restraint stress are segregated within the lateral septal area of rats. PLoS ONE 6, e23171 (2011).

  14. 14.

    , , & Acute and chronic restraint stress alter the incidence of social conflict in male rats. Horm Behav 43, 205–213 (2003).

  15. 15.

    et al. Temporal Dynamics of Acute Stress-Induced Dendritic Remodeling in Medial Prefrontal Cortex and the Protective Effect of Desipramine. Cereb. Cortex. 10.1093/cercor/bhv254 (2015).

  16. 16.

    et al. Acute stress enhances glutamatergic transmission in prefrontal cortex and facilitates working memory. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 106, 14075–14079 (2009).

  17. 17.

    et al. Restraint stress increases hemichannel activity in hippocampal glial cells and neurons. Front Cell Neurosci 9, 102 (2015).

  18. 18.

    & Acute stress enhances while chronic stress suppresses cell-mediated immunity in vivo: a potential role for leukocyte trafficking. Brain Behav. Immun. 11, 286–306 (1997).

  19. 19.

    , , & Effects of stress throughout the lifespan on the brain, behaviour and cognition. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 10, 434–445 (2009).

  20. 20.

    , stress, and anhedonia: toward a synthesis and integrated model. Annual review of clinical psychology 10, 393–423 (2014).

  21. 21.

    et al. Learning and memory impairments in a neuroendocrine mouse model of anxiety/depression. Front Behav Neurosci 8, 136 (2014).

  22. 22.

    , & Brain energy metabolism: focus on astrocyte-neuron metabolic cooperation. Cell Metab. 14, 724–738 (2011).

  23. 23.

    & Adult hippocampal neurogenesis in depression. Nature neuroscience 10, 1110–1115 (2007).

  24. 24.

    , , & Neurogenesis and generalization: a new approach to stratify and treat anxiety disorders. Nature neuroscience 15, 1613–1620 (2012).

  25. 25.

    3D MRI studies of neuroanatomic changes in unipolar major depression: the role of stress and medical comorbidity. Biological psychiatry (2000). at .

  26. 26.

    , , , & Interaction of childhood stress with hippocampus and prefrontal cortex volume reduction in major depression. Journal of psychiatric research 44, 799–807 (2010).

  27. 27.

    & Hippocampal volume and depression: a meta-analysis of MRI studies. American Journal of Psychiatry (2004). at .

  28. 28.

    , & Neural mechanisms of stress resilience and vulnerability. Neuron 75, 747–761 (2012).

  29. 29.

    & KEGG: kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 28, 27–30 (2000).

  30. 30.

    et al. Gene ontology: tool for the unification of biology. The Gene Ontology Consortium. Nat. Genet. 25, 25–29 (2000).

  31. 31.

    et al. Convergent functional genomics of anxiety disorders: translational identification of genes, biomarkers, pathways and mechanisms. Transl Psychiatry 1, e9 (2011).

  32. 32.

    et al. Genetic variants in the DRD2 gene moderate the relationship between stressful life events and depressive symptoms in adults: cardiovascular risk in young Finns study. Psychosomatic Medicine 69, 391–395 (2007).

  33. 33.

    Involvement of serotonin in depression: evidence from postmortem and imaging studies of serotonin receptors and the serotonin transporter. Journal of psychiatric research (2003). at .

  34. 34.

    , & Transcriptional dysregulation of 5-HT1A autoreceptors in mental illness. Molecular brain 4, 1 (2011).

  35. 35.

    et al. Metabolomic identification of biochemical changes induced by fluoxetine and imipramine in a chronic mild stress mouse model of depression. Sci Rep 5, 8890 (2015).

  36. 36.

    & Psychopharmacological treatment in PTSD: a critical review. Journal of psychiatric research (2002). at .

  37. 37.

    , , , & Chronic fluoxetine stimulates maturation and synaptic plasticity of adult-born hippocampal granule cells. J. Neurosci. 28, 1374–1384 (2008).

  38. 38.

    et al. Astrocyte-derived ATP modulates depressive-like behaviors. Nature Medicine 19, 773–777 (2013).

  39. 39.

    , , , & Protracted acute stress reaction following an earthquake. Acta Psychiatr Scand 107, 18–24 (2003).

  40. 40.

    et al. Cerebral metabolism in major depressive disorder: a voxel-based meta-analysis of positron emission tomography studies. BMC Psychiatry 14, 321 (2014).

  41. 41.

    Neuroimaging studies in post-traumatic stress disorder. Current psychiatry reports (2002). at .

  42. 42.

    & The dopamine hypothesis of schizophrenia: version III—the final common pathway. Schizophrenia bulletin 35, 549–562 (2009).

  43. 43.

    Potential role of adenosine A2A receptors in the treatment of schizophrenia. Frontiers in bioscience: a journal and virtual library (2007).

  44. 44.

    et al. Oligodendrocyte morphometry and expression of myelin - Related mRNA in ventral prefrontal white matter in major depressive disorder. J Psychiatr Res 65, 53–62 (2015).

  45. 45.

    , & Reduced myelin basic protein and actin-related gene expression in visual cortex in schizophrenia. PLoS ONE 7, e38211 (2012).

  46. 46.

    , & Transcriptional profiling reveals evidence for signaling and oligodendroglial abnormalities in the temporal cortex from patients with major depressive disorder. Mol. Psychiatry 10, 309–322 (2005).

  47. 47.

    et al. mTOR Inhibition ameliorates cognitive and affective deficits caused by Disc1 knockdown in adult-born dentate granule neurons. Neuron 77, 647–654 (2013).

  48. 48.

    Psychiatric disorders: The dangers of adult-born neuron defects. Nature Reviews Neuroscience. 10.1038/nrn3477 (2013)

  49. 49.

    , , & Depression research: where are we now? Mol Brain 3, 8 (2010).

  50. 50.

    , , , & Adult hippocampal neurogenesis buffers stress responses and depressive behaviour. Nature 476, 458–461 (2011).

  51. 51.

    & Can adult neurogenesis buffer stress responses and depressive behaviour? Mol. Psychiatry 17, 9–10 (2012).

  52. 52.

    et al. Chronic psychosocial stress and concomitant repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation: effects on stress hormone levels and adult hippocampal neurogenesis. Biol. Psychiatry 52, 1057–1065 (2002).

  53. 53.

    , & Nuclear factor-κB is a critical mediator of stress-impaired neurogenesis and depressive behavior. Proceedings of the … (2010). at .

  54. 54.

    , , & Suppressed proliferation and apoptotic changes in the rat dentate gyrus after acute and chronic stress are reversible. European Journal of …, 10.1046/j.1460-9568.2003.03100.x (2004).

  55. 55.

    , , & Repeated restraint stress suppresses neurogenesis and induces biphasic PSA‐NCAM expression in the adult rat dentate gyrus. Eur J Neurosci 17, 879–886 (2003).

  56. 56.

    , & Several stressors fail to reduce adult hippocampal neurogenesis. Psychoneuroendocrinology 36, 1520–1529 (2011). at .

  57. 57.

    et al. Acute stress enhances adult rat hippocampal neurogenesis and activation of newborn neurons via secreted astrocytic FGF2. eLife 2, e00362 (2013).

  58. 58.

    & Acute psychosocial stress reduces cell survival in adult hippocampal neurogenesis without altering proliferation. The Journal of Neuroscience 27, 2734–2743. (2007). at .

  59. 59.

    , , , & Behavioral animal models of depression. Neurosci Bull 26, 327–337 (2010).

  60. 60.

    & Stress models of depression: forming genetically vulnerable strains. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 29, 799–804 (2005).

  61. 61.

    & Animal models for posttraumatic stress disorder: An overview of what is used in research. World J Psychiatry 5, 387–396 (2015).

  62. 62.

    et al. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation ameliorates anxiety-like behavior and impaired sensorimotor gating in a rat model of post-traumatic stress disorder. PLoS ONE 10, e0117189 (2015).

  63. 63.

    et al. Symptoms of posttraumatic stress disorder, depression, and anxiety among junior high school students in worst-hit areas 3 years after the Wenchuan earthquake in China. Asia Pac J Public Health 27, NP1985–NP1994 (2015).

  64. 64.

    , , & Comorbidity of 9/11-related PTSD and depression in the World Trade Center Health Registry 10-11 years postdisaster. J Trauma Stress 27, 680–688 (2014).

  65. 65.

    , , , & Stress-induced anhedonia in mice is associated with deficits in forced swimming and exploration. Neuropsychopharmacology 29, 2007–2017 (2004).

  66. 66.

    , , & Specific developmental disruption of disrupted-in-schizophrenia-1 function results in schizophrenia-related phenotypes in mice. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA (2007). 10.1073/pnas.0706900104

  67. 67.

    et al. Performance evaluation of the Trans-PET® BioCaliburn® LH system: a large FOV small-animal PET system. Phys Med Biol 60, 137–150 (2015).

  68. 68.

    & Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2− ΔΔCT method. methods (2001). at .

  69. 69.

    , , & An efficient extraction method for quantitation of adenosine triphosphate in mammalian tissues and cells. Analytica chimica acta 727, 8–12 (2012).

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to all those who participated in this research for their contributions. This work was supported by the National Major Scientific Instruments Development Project (2012YQ03026007, 2013YQ030923), the National Nature Science Foundation of China (81271511, 31300895, 81421061), the Shanghai Municipal Commission of Science and Technology Program (14JC1403700), “Eastern Scholar” project supported by Shanghai Municipal Education Commission, the fund of Shanghai Jiao Tong University (15JCZZ02), National Key Laboratory of Human Factors Engineering Open Fund Project (HF2013-K-02), the Funds of Shanghai Key Laboratory of Psychotic Disorder (13dz2260500, 15-K01), the National Key Laboratory Grant of Human Factors Engineering (SYFD140051801) and the National Basic Research Program of China (2011CB711000).

Author information

Author notes

    • Xixia Chu
    • , Ying Zhou
    • , Zhiqiang Hu
    •  & Jingyu Lou

    These authors contributed equally to this work.

Affiliations

  1. Bio-X Institutes, Key Laboratory for the Genetics of Development and Neuropsychiatric Disorders (Ministry of Education), Shanghai Key Laboratory of Psychotic Disorders, and Brain Science and Technology Research Center, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 800 Dongchuan Road, Shanghai 200240, China

    • Xixia Chu
    • , Ying Zhou
    • , Jingyu Lou
    • , Wei Song
    • , Shuai Wang
    • , Beimeng Yang
    • , Lei Chen
    • , Xu Zhang
    • , Jinjing Song
    • , Yujie Dong
    • , Shiqing Chen
    • , Lin He
    •  & Weidong Li
  2. School of Life Science and Biotechnology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 800 Dongchuan Road, Shanghai 200240, China

    • Zhiqiang Hu
  3. Huazhong University of Science and Technology, 1037 Luoyu Road, Wuhan 430074, Hubei, China

    • Jing Li
    • , Xiao Liang
    • , Chen Chen
    •  & Qingguo Xie
  4. National Key Laboratory of Human Factors Engineering, China Astronaut Research and Training Center, Beijing 100094, China

    • Xiaoping Chen
  5. Wuxi Mental Health Center, 156 Qianrong Road, Wuxi 214151, Jiangsu, China

    • Weidong Li

Authors

  1. Search for Xixia Chu in:

  2. Search for Ying Zhou in:

  3. Search for Zhiqiang Hu in:

  4. Search for Jingyu Lou in:

  5. Search for Wei Song in:

  6. Search for Jing Li in:

  7. Search for Xiao Liang in:

  8. Search for Chen Chen in:

  9. Search for Shuai Wang in:

  10. Search for Beimeng Yang in:

  11. Search for Lei Chen in:

  12. Search for Xu Zhang in:

  13. Search for Jinjing Song in:

  14. Search for Yujie Dong in:

  15. Search for Shiqing Chen in:

  16. Search for Lin He in:

  17. Search for Qingguo Xie in:

  18. Search for Xiaoping Chen in:

  19. Search for Weidong Li in:

Contributions

W.L. conceived and designed the study. X.C. and Y.Z. constructed the animal model and took part in almost all behavioral tests. W.S. and S.W. conducted the forced swim test. B.Y. and L.C. conducted the sucrose preference test. J.L., Q.X., X.L. and C.C. conducted the PET scanning. Z.H. analyzed the microarray data. X.Z. and Y.D. carried out qPCR verification. J.S. and S.C. conducted the ATP assay. X.C., L.H., Z.H. and W.L. wrote the manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Qingguo Xie or Xiaoping Chen or Weidong Li.

Supplementary information

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Creative Commons BYThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/