Article | Open | Published:

The use of the terrestrial snails of the genera Megalobulimus and Thaumastus as representatives of the atmospheric carbon reservoir

Scientific Reports volume 6, Article number: 27395 (2016) | Download Citation

Abstract

In Brazilian archaeological shellmounds, many species of land snails are found abundantly distributed throughout the occupational layers, forming a contextualized set of samples within the sites and offering a potential alternative to the use of charcoal for radiocarbon dating analyses. In order to confirm the effectiveness of this alternative, one needs to prove that the mollusk shells reflect the atmospheric carbon isotopic concentration in the same way charcoal does. In this study, 18 terrestrial mollusk shells with known collection dates from 1948 to 2004 AD, around the nuclear bombs period, were radiocarbon dated. The obtained dates fit the SH1-2 bomb curve within less than 15 years range, showing that certain species from the Thaumastus and Megalobulimus genera are reliable representatives of the atmospheric carbon isotopic ratio and can, therefore, be used to date archaeological sites in South America.

Introduction

Archaeological shellmounds are the testimony of the hunter-fisher-gatherer populations who first occupied the Brazilian coast. They are dated mostly from 5 to 2 ka BP and can be found along a considerable extension of the Brazilian coastline1. The archaeological remains usually recovered in such sites are charcoal fragments (scattered or associated with hearths), human bones, lithic tools (e.g. scrapers, mortar and pestles), stone arrow points and a great amount of food remains such as animal bones, mollusk shells (both marine and terrestrial) and fish otoliths. More than simple remnants, the shells constitute the base of the mounds, which can reach up to 30 m in height. Despite being the most abundant and well preserved material found in this type of site, for chronological studies marine shells are often avoided due to the lack of knowledge about local marine reservoir effects2. Therefore, charcoal has become the most commonly dated material by archaeologists3,4.

Charcoal dating has to be performed with care due to the possibility of the old wood effect, that is the use of long-lived trees in fires, which would reflect the age of the wood instead of the time of the burning5. However, the anthracological analysis of the samples can prevent the use of such species or otherwise allow recognizing charcoal from barks or twigs, which would be contemporary of the death of the tree6. Moreover, depending on the way charcoal samples are found over the settlement, different information can be achieved7. Concentrated charcoal, usually associated with hearths, is more visible in the excavations, but there is also a great amount of scattered charcoal present in the sediment8,9,10,11. The latter is more difficult to be contextualized within the site due to possible events of bioturbation and weathering processes that would disturb its archaeostratigraphy.

In this context, the use of terrestrial mollusk shells as representatives of the atmospheric carbon isotopic ratio presents itself as a possibility of dating more and better distributed and contextualized samples over the settlement. However, as with charcoal, care should be taken in choosing the appropriate species for sampling. Some terrestrial mollusks scrape carbonate from limestone, which is a source of old carbon, i.e. low in radiocarbon content. This depleted carbon 14 material can be incorporated into the animal shell and result in false old dates12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19. Goodfriend & Hood13 reported 0–33% dead carbon incorporation in gastropod shells from Jamaica in regions with limestone. Dye15 compared gastropod shells from Pleistocene limestone and Holocene volcanic coasts with known collecting dates and estimated apparent ages of up to 620 yr in the former for shells of the same species. Quarta et al.16 studied two gastropod species from Italy and found an age anomaly of 1000 yr.

Goodfriend & Hood13 describe the different pathways by which limestone carbon can end up as shell carbonate. Yates20 discussed the incorporation of old carbon by diagenesis that would add up to the limestone effect. Stott19, based on a labelled feeding experiment, suggested that only metabolic carbon would influence the isotopic composition of the shell. Despite the limestone effect, in other works, some species were found to be in equilibrium with the atmosphere during the animal’s life and therefore would provide reliable dates21,22. Pigati, Rech & Nekola21 studied 46 different species of land snails from habitats on carbonate terrains. Amongst these, 78% did not contain old carbon, and only 3% contained more than 10% dead carbon. Therefore, there may be differences related to carbonate incorporation between species. Also, for fossil shells of small terrestrial gastropods recovered from well-dated, late-Pleistocene sediments in the Midwest of the United States, they found ages that were statistically indistinguishable from ages obtained from well-preserved plant macrofossils (wood, bark, plant remains)21. Carvalho et al.22 compared archaeological charcoal and land snails from the same context and have shown that the terrestrial mollusk Thaumastus achilles (Pfeiffer, 1852) provides reliable atmospheric dates. In such work those dates were used for marine reservoir effect calculations.

In the present study, the choice of samples belonging to the genera Megalobulimus and Thaumastus (Fig. 1), out of the hundreds of terrestrial snails genera present in South America23, was based on their common occurrence in the region, both at present and within archaeological context. Both genera are widespread, but endemic in South America, where they are easily found, allowing comparative studies in other areas of the continent.

Figure 1: Apertural view of used species (measurements made with a digital caliper).
Figure 1

(A) Thaumastus taunaisii MZUSP 104511 (length = 63.4 mm); (B) Thaumastus achilles MZUSP 111243 (length = 50.9 mm); (C) Thaumastus magnificus MZUSP 72411 (length = 72.9 mm); (D) Megalobulimus sp. MZUSP 26557 (length = 56.0 mm).

In many of the Brazilian shellmounds, terrestrial mollusk shells are widely distributed. In the sites located on the Rio de Janeiro coast, specimens of Thaumastus sp. and Megalobulimus sp. are abundant. Therefore, the use of these snails as archaeological records for dating purposes could be an important tool in the study of hunter-fisher-gatherers settlements in Brazil. The aim of this study is to evaluate the use of such species as representatives of the atmospheric carbon reservoir.

Radiocarbon concentration in the atmosphere varies over time mainly due to variations in Earth magnetic field and solar activity. Provided that an organism is in isotopic equilibrium with the atmospheric reservoir, its initial concentration is easily related to the atmospheric calibration curves and reliable dating can be performed.

Due to nuclear weapons tests carried out by different countries, the 14C atmospheric concentration started rapidly increasing in 1955 AD reaching a maximum in the 1960s24. This so-called bomb peak was higher in the Northern Hemisphere, since this is where most of the tests were performed25, and almost doubled the quantity of 14C in terrestrial materials26,27,28. Since then, the atmospheric levels of bomb 14C have decreased due to the incorporation of this carbon into the global carbon cycle and the industrial effect acting in the opposite direction24,29,30,31,32. Currently, atmospheric 14C is slightly higher than its pre-bomb value.

The difference in bomb 14C atmospheric concentration between the Hemispheres generated a great 14C gradient in the troposphere (between North and South, and between high and low latitudes) during the early bomb period. Consequently, the contrast in 14C content between regional tropospheric air masses was increased and excess 14C was transferred southwards. Atmospheric circulation drove the spatial distribution of bomb 14C in the troposphere during the early bomb period33,34,35. This does not create a simply latitudinal gradient of 14C, but 3 different zones in the Northern Hemisphere and 2 zones in the Southern Hemisphere. Brazilian south, southeast, and part of west-central and northeast regions belong to zone 1–2 (Fig. 2), therefore the post-bomb atmospheric SH1-2 calibration curve35 should reflect the isotopic composition of terrestrial snails’ shells from this region since 1950 AD (Fig. 3). The curve is based on annual data but using mean values for summer months, necessary to produce unbiased weighted zonal mean values. According to Hua, Barbetti & Rakowski35, SH zone 1–2 was compiled using a separate dataset from zone 3 in the period from 1950 to 1972, and for the period from 1973 onwards, only 1 dataset for the SH was compiled.

Figure 2: South America map showing the different zones considered by Hua et al.35 and Brazilian states where the samples were collected (Santa Catarina-SC, Paraná-PR, São Paulo-SP, Rio de Janeiro-RJ, Espírito Santo-ES, Minas Gerais-MG, Goiás-GO, Pernambuco-PE).
Figure 2

The solid line represents the Equator. Starred and dotted lines mark Intertropical Convergence Zone (ITCZ). Map generated with R 3.2.3 (http://www.R-project.org/) and edited with Gimp 2.8 (https://www.gimp.org).

Figure 3: Red: Thaumastus sp. Blue: Megalobulimus sp. Fraction of modern carbon of the measured land snails x collecting years (a negative error bar was applied to estimate the longevity of individuals up to 5 or 10 years); Black: post-bomb atmospheric SH1-2 calibration curve35.
Figure 3

In order to evaluate carbon isotopic ratios in terrestrial mollusk shells, we have dated 18 individual snail shells from the repository of the Zoology Museum of São Paulo University (MZUSP) which were collected around the radiocarbon bomb peak period, between 1948 and 2004 AD.

Results

The results of the radiocarbon isotopic ratios for each of the mollusk shells along with the collecting years and locations are presented in Table 1. We have also included the results from 3 Thaumastus achilles samples collected alive in 2013 AD, from the work of Carvalho et al.22. Sample codes from the USP zoology museum collection are presented, as well as lab codes for each radiocarbon age measured. Radiocarbon determinations for four of the samples were duplicated at the Fluminense Federal and Oxford universities’ laboratories. Location refers to the Brazilian states as shown in the map in Fig. 2.

Table 1: Collecting years and Fraction modern carbon obtained from the set of analysed samples.

The values are expressed in Fraction Modern, i.e. the radiocarbon isotopic ratio corrected for isotopic fractionation and divided by the hypothetic isotopic ratio of the atmospheric reservoir in 1950 AD36.

Figure 3 shows the results of Fraction Modern for the land snails versus their collecting dates, along with the SH1-2 bomb peak curve35. Since the shell grows during the animal’s life, its composition may reflect the radiocarbon concentration of the atmosphere in any of the years it was alive. Although gastropod shells grow in a spiral pattern it is not straightforward that growth bands would contain only carbon from specific years since there is evidence that broken shells can regenerate and will therefore contain carbon from any of which years. A 10 years old gastropod sample collected in 1970, for instance, is likely to contain carbon incorporated in 1960, before the peak, when atmospheric levels were lower than those of 1970. Consistently, the same could happen for samples collected in 1980, as they enclose carbon from 1970, when atmospheric levels were higher than those of 1980. Since the measured samples are small compared to the size of the shell, there is also the possibility of the sampling process selecting carbon from the year of death of the animal, what would lead to the actual atmospheric levels at such year. For this reason, an asymmetric error bar was used, in order to account for the animals’ lifespan.

Discussion

From the Fraction modern results presented in Table 1 it is possible to evaluate the consistency between the two laboratories. Results are statistically similar for the four compared samples, which indicates that the different preparation methods (see methods section) give equivalent results.

In Fig. 3 it can be observed that, for both Thaumastus and Megalobulimus genera, most of the dating results follow the SH1-2 bomb 14C concentration in respective collecting years within less than 5 years range. This implies that these terrestrial snails can correctly record the radiocarbon atmospheric concentration over time.

Since both genera of terrestrial mollusks were found to be in equilibrium with the atmospheric carbon reservoir during their lives, they constitute a satisfactory alternative to the use of charcoal in chronological studies within archaeological sites. According to Pigati, Rech & Nekola21, carbonate in gastropod shells can have four different sources: atmospheric CO2 (by respiration), food (plants and general organic detritus), water (from dew, soil moisture, standing water and precipitation) and carbonate rocks (scraping limestone, dolomite or soil carbonate). Amounts of each source contribution are variable and depend on species and habitat. Amongst these sources, incorporation from limestone and other carbonate rocks presents the most significant problem to using shells as a proxy for atmospheric carbon21.

According to Wilbur37 bicarbonate in the extrapallial fluid is originated in the hemolymph or by direct diffusion of CO2 from the environment13 and is then deposited in the shell carbonate. Rubin, Likins & Berry12 claim that major inputs of limestone-derived carbon come from ingestion, followed by dissolution in the gut and diffusion into the hemolymph, or from uptake of limestone dissolved in secretions through the foot17,38. Considering the observed results, we excluded the possibility of the incorporation of old carbon by most of the studied herbivorous terrestrial snails of Thaumastus and Megalobulimus22,39. According to the distribution of the karst regions in Brazil40, most of the studied sites present potential availability of carbonate rocks. Moreover, for regions as São Domingos, in the state of Goiás, where samples were collected from inside a cave with great amount of limestone, or important areas of carbonate rocks exploitation, as Aracruz and Baixo Gandú, in the state of Espírito Santo, the studied snails are not affected by the dead carbon effect for reasons that remain unexplained. According to Pigati, Rech & Nekola21 the need for calcium would push larger snails to obtain it from rocks as opposed to smaller taxa, which would fulfil their needs with a regular diet (plants, detritus and water). If this was the case for the studied taxa, especially for the very large snails from the Megalobulimus genera, dietary contribution to the shell composition would be negligible, since none of the studied snails did incorporate dead carbon.

Four of the analysed Thaumastus sp. samples are between 10 and 15 years far from the curve (MZUSP 111243, MZUSP 104511 and 2 shells from MZUSP 62044). Samples MZUSP 111243 and MZUSP 104511 present values lower than the corresponding collecting years, 1972 and 1967, respectively. This could be explained by incorporation of dead carbon by the Thaumastus taunaisii snail collected in Iporanga, SP, a recognized area of limestone. However, in the case of the Thaumastus achilles snail, collected at Marataizes, ES, this explanation is not so straightforward. Although the Espírito Santo state has important exploitation sites for ornamental stones production, the southern coast is characterized by Quaternary sand deposits intercalated with cliffs of the Tertiary Barreiras formation with no significant limestone presence41.

Concerning the two individual samples from MZUSP 62044 batch, the results are higher than the atmospheric concentration in 1985. This suggests that the reason for the lag in dates for all four samples which fall away from the bomb curve is due to lifespan rather than the incorporation of fossil carbon through scraping. Hence, it is very likely that they were collected (or died) a few years earlier than the date this specific samples were handed to the museum by fisherman (see methods section). Another possible reason for discrepancy for these four samples could be the lifespan of terrestrial mollusks, as previously discussed.

There is not much in literature on the longevity of such animals42,43,44. Moreover, the diversity of species is great and the lifespans depends on many factors. In a survey of the available literature, Heller42 has revealed longevity records of 75 species from 57 different genera from an overall estimate of 1700 existing genera. According to this author, lifespans of terrestrial gastropods usually range from several months to 19 years. A study on the species Placostylus hongii (Pulmonata: Bulimulidae) estimates a lifespan of at least 10 years43. Large snails, such as some species of Megalobulimus, are believed to live for decades. Recent studies on specific species reveal lifespans of about 30 years for Megalobulimus paranaguensis44 or even up to 88 years for Megalobulimus intertextus45.

The taxonomy of such land snails is still confused, the number of species is very likely underestimated and, if there is poor information in relation to the species themselves, a worse scenario can be expected in relation to the remaining biological information. It is expected that the ongoing analysis of several samples from the same shell will help to solve this question and maybe to understand whether there is a pattern of growth that could be related to age. Further work is also in progress in order to estimate more precise lifespans for the studied animals.

For archaeological studies, a lifespan of 20 years or less would not represent a problem. It is less than the typical uncertainties from radiocarbon determinations and it is less than the typical lifespan of a short lived tree species. Therefore, charcoal samples would provide similar or even larger uncertainties if lifespan was to be considered. A terrestrial mollusk based chronology would then provide results as accurate as charcoal samples would, presenting an option for charcoal samples from long-lived trees, making it possible to avoid the old-wood effect. Furthermore, the conclusions drawn here allow chronological studies to be performed in sites with either none or non-contextualized charcoal.

For the Thaumastus taunaisii and the Thaumastus achilles taxa, more studies are needed to explain the observed discrepancy. Measurements of present day specimens from such species in areas of limestone would help to confirm whether the differences in concentration are due to the animal’s lifespan or to the incorporation of dead carbon. Either way, for archaeological samples collected in areas without limestone, the method would still be valid. The conclusions of this study are valuable in the sense that they expand the variety of possible studies on Brazilian shellmounds and other archaeological sites in South America, where the presence of the studied genera have been reported.

In the work of Carvalho et al.22 Thaumastus achilles shells and charcoal samples from the Manitiba shellmound, in Saquarema, RJ, were found to have similar radiocarbon concentration, with conventional ages ranging from 3659 ± 25 to 3748 ± 38 yr BP for terrestrial snails and from 3598 ± 46 to 3747 ± 22 yr BP for charcoal. Ongoing work on archaeological Megalobulimus specimens from the Usiminas shellmound, in Ilha de Cabo Frio, RJ, also seem to corroborate our results. On the other hand, none of these areas have carbonate rocks, what would limit the validity of such works for non-karstic areas.

Another issue concerning mollusk shells, either for marine or terrestrial organisms, could be the possibility of recrystallization since it has been observed that for old samples, aragonite can transform into calcite, allowing exogenous carbon atoms to be incorporated20,46. In this case, monitoring with X-ray diffraction, for example, can give information regarding the aragonite/calcite ratios. Even though extra care is required, carbonate samples are the most straightforward, cheaper and less time consuming to chemically prepare.

Methods

Sample selection

For this study we have analyzed 12 Thaumastus and 6 Megalobulimus selected from the MZUSP collection. The animals were sampled by researchers over the last decades for zoological purposes across several Brazilian States, comprising Cerrado and Atlantic forest biomes, in regions with and without limestone. Our aim was to relate the collection dates of the animals to the radiocarbon bomb peak based on their radiocarbon ratios, provided that the samples were collected alive by zoologists and the collection dates were accurately recorded. Since terrestrial snails’ shells could contain carbon from any year during the animal’s life, we took into account a negative error bar considering an estimate longevity. Two of the samples (MZUSP 62044) were handed to the museum by fishermen, so the collection date should be understood as a limit year, since they could have been collected dead or stored for an unknown period of time.

Sample preparation and measurement

The shells had their radiocarbon content measured at either the Radiocarbon Laboratory of the Fluminense Federal University (LAC-UFF), in Brazil, or at the Oxford Radiocarbon Accelerator Unit (ORAU), United Kingdom. Four of the studied samples were prepared and measured in both laboratories to check for consistency.

The sample preparation followed standard procedures in each laboratory47,48. From each shell a sample of approximately 40 mg was collected by cutting the shell with a diamond cutter. At ORAU samples were soaked in Feigl’s solution to indicate the presence of calcite from recrystallization. The outer layer, which could have been contaminated, was removed with a sand blaster at ORAU while at LAC-UFF it was done by etching with hydrochloric acid. In both laboratories, all the samples were then hydrolyzed in phosphoric acid and the carbon dioxide purified and graphitized. At LAC-UFF graphitization is performed in independently sealed pyrex tubes containing titanium hydride and zinc at the bottom and an inner tube with iron. The tubes are baked at 520 °C for 7 h47. At ORAU the graphitization takes place in a double fold tube filled with hydrogen gas. The side of the tube containing iron is heated to 560 °C for 6 h49. At ORAU the samples were measured in a High Voltage 2 MV accelerator50 and at LAC-UFF the samples were measured in a single stage 250 kV AMS system built by National Electrostatics Corporation. The measurements were corrected for isotopic fractionation using stable isotopes ratios measured simultaneously in the accelerator.

Additional Information

How to cite this article: Macario, K.D. et al. The use of the terrestrial snails of the genera Megalobulimus and Thaumastus as representatives of the atmospheric carbon reservoir. Sci. Rep. 6, 27395; doi: 10.1038/srep27395 (2016).

References

  1. 1.

    Considerations of the sambaquis of the Brazilian coast. Antiquity 72, 592–615 (1998).

  2. 2.

    , , & Early maritime adaptations in the Andes: Preliminary studies at the Ring Site, Peru In , , (Eds), Ecology, Settlement, and History in the Osmore Drainage, Peru. BAR International Series 35–84 (1989).

  3. 3.

    & Archaeology in Practice A Student Guide to Archaeological Analyses (Blackwell, 2006).

  4. 4.

    Dating by AMS radiocarbon analysis. in (Ed.) Handbook of Rock Art Research AltaMira Press, Walnut Creek, California, 139–166 (2001).

  5. 5.

    Dating New Zealand archaeology by radiocarbon. New Zeal. J. Sci. 25, 379–392 (1982).

  6. 6.

    et al. Radiocarbon Reservoir corrections on the Brazilian coast from pre-bomb marine shells. Quat. Geochronol. 29, 30–35 (2015).

  7. 7.

    Teoria e métodos em antracologia. 1. Considerações teóricas e perspectivas. Arq. do Museu Nacional 62, 3–14 (2004).

  8. 8.

    Pourquoi et comment prélever les charbons de bois pour la période antique: les méthodes utilisées sur le site de Lattes (Hérault). Lattara 1, 187–222 (1988).

  9. 9.

    Forêt et sociétés en Languedoc (Néolithique final, Antiquité final, Antiquité tardive), L’anthracologie, méthode et paléoécologie. Documents d’Archaéologie Française 63 Éditions de la Maison des Sciences de l’Homme, Paris, 192 p (1997).

  10. 10.

    Dynamique des végétations holocènes en Méditerranée nord occidentale d’après l’anthracoanalyse de sites préhistoriques: méthodologie et paléoécologie. Paléobiologie Continentale, Montpellier 16, 1–212 (1990).

  11. 11.

    & Méthodes utilisées en Anthracologie pour l’étude de sites préhistoriques. In Recent Developments in Western Mediterranean Prehistory Vol. 2 Archaeological Techniques, Technology and Theory (ed. ) 17–47 (Archaeopress, 1991).

  12. 12.

    , & On the Validity of Radiocarbon Dates from Snail Shells. The Journal of Geology 71(1), 84–89 (1963).

  13. 13.

    & Carbon isotope analysis of land snail shells: implications for carbon sources and radiocarbon dating. Radiocarbon 25, 810–830 (1983).

  14. 14.

    & Limestone and the problem of radiocarbon dating of land-snail shell carbonate. Geology 11, 575–577 (1983).

  15. 15.

    Apparent ages of marine shells: implications for archaeological dating in Hawai’i. Radiocarbon 36, 51–57 (1994).

  16. 16.

    , , , & Radiocarbon age anomalies in pre- and post-bomb land snails from the coastal Mediterranean basin. Radiocarbon 49, 817–826 (2007).

  17. 17.

    Validity of Radiocarbon Dates on Terrestrial Snail Shells. American Antiquity 35(1), 94–100 (1970).

  18. 18.

    Studies of non-marine mollusks for the selection of shell samples for radiocarbon dating. Radiocarbon 28, 457–463 (1986).

  19. 19.

    , , , & The reliability of AMS radiocarbon dating of shells from China. Radiocarbon 41(1), 17–24 (1999).

  20. 20.

    The influence of diet on the δ13C of shell carbon in the pulmonate snail Helix aspersa. Earth and Planetary Science Letters 195(3), 249–259 (2002).

  21. 21.

    , & Radiocarbon dating of small terrestrial gastropod shells in North America. Quat. Geochronol. 5, 519–532 (2010).

  22. 22.

    et al. Potential Use of Archaeological Snail Shells for the Calculation of Local Marine Reservoir Effect. Radiocarbon 57, 459–467 (2015).

  23. 23.

    Land and freshwater molluscs of Brazil (EGB, Fapesp, São Paulo, 2006).

  24. 24.

    & Radiocarbon – a Unique Tracer of Global Carbon Cycle Dynamics. Radiocarbon 42, 69–80 (2000).

  25. 25.

    & Carbon-14 measurements in atmospheric CO2 from northern and southern hemisphere sites, 1962–1993, ORNL/CDIAC-93. NDP-057, Carbon Dioxide Information Analysis Centre, Oak Ridge National. Laboratory Oak Ridge, 193–201 (1996).

  26. 26.

    Further investigation on the transfer of radiocarbon in nature. J. Geophys. Res. 73, 3617–3635 (1968).

  27. 27.

    et al. 25 years of tropospheric 14C observations in Central Europe. Radiocarbon 27, 1–19 (1985).

  28. 28.

    Radiocarbon Dating: An Archaeological Perspective New York: Academic Press, Inc,. (1987).

  29. 29.

    , & Does the ocean-atmosphere system have more than one stable mode of operation? Nature 315, 21–26 (1985).

  30. 30.

    , & Environmental impact of atmospheric Carbon-14 emissions resulting from the nuclear energy cycle. In Radiocarbon after Four Decades 519–534 (1992).

  31. 31.

    , , & Observations and modelling of the global distribution and long‐term trend of atmospheric 14CO2. Tellus B 62, 26–46 (2010).

  32. 32.

    , , , & Changing controls on oceanic radiocarbon: New insights on shallow‐to‐deep ocean exchange and anthropogenic CO2 uptake. J. Geophys. Res. 117 C10 (2012).

  33. 33.

    & Influence of atmospheric circulation on regional 14CO2 differences. J. Geophys. Res. 112(19), D19102–1 (2007).

  34. 34.

    & Review of tropospheric bomb 14C data for carbon cycle modeling and age calibration purposes. Radiocarbon 46(3), 1273–1298 (2004).

  35. 35.

    , & Atmospheric radiocarbon for the period 1950-2010. Radiocarbon 55, 2059–2072 (2013).

  36. 36.

    , & Isotope-ratio and background corrections for accelerator mass spectrometry radiocarbon measurements. Radiocarbon 32, 135–42 (1990).

  37. 37.

    Shell formation in mollusks. Chemical zoology 7, 103–145. (1972).

  38. 38.

    Kalziumstoffwechsel bei Helix pomatia unter dem Einfluß wechselnder Kohlensäureatmosphären. Mitteilungen aus dem Museum für Naturkunde in Berlin. Zoologisches Museum und Institut für Spezielle Zoologie (Berlin), 41(1), 95–120 (1965).

  39. 39.

    & Population dynamics of Megalobulimus paranaguensis (Gastropoda: Pulmonata) In The southeast coast of Brazil. Zoologia (Curitiba), 32(6), 463–468 (2015).

  40. 40.

    , & Mapa de potencialidade de ocorrência de cavernas no Brasil, na escala de 1:2.500.000. Revista Brasileira de Espeleologia, 1(2), 42–57 (2012).

  41. 41.

    , , & Coastal quaternary formations of the Southern part of the state of Espirito Santo (Brazil). Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciencias 68(3), 389–404 (1996).

  42. 42.

    Longevity in molluscs. Malacologia 31, 259–295 (1990).

  43. 43.

    , & Population structure, growth and longevity of Placostylus hongii (Pulmonata: Bulimulidae) on Tawhiti Rahi Island, Poor Knights Islands, New Zealand. Pacific Conservation Biology 9, 241–247 (2004).

  44. 44.

    & The use of outer lip in age estimation of Megalobulimus paranaguensis (Gastropoda, Pulmonata). Strombus 19, 15–22 (2012).

  45. 45.

    On a gerontic Megalobulimus from Mato Grosso, Brazil (Gastropoda, Strophocheilidae). Visaya 1, 55–58 (2005).

  46. 46.

    , & Improved AMS 14C dating of shell carbonates using high-precision X-ray diffraction and a novel density separation protocol (CarDS). Radiocarbon 52(3), 735–751 (2010).

  47. 47.

    et al. Advances in the graphitization protocol at the Radiocarbon Laboratory of the Universidade Federal Fluminense (LAC-UFF) in Brazil. Nuclear Instr. And Meth. In Phys. Res. B 361, 402–405 (2015).

  48. 48.

    , , & Current Pretreatment Methods for AMS Radiocarbon Dating at the Oxford Radiocarbon Accelerator Unit (ORAU). Radiocarbon 52, 103–112 (2010).

  49. 49.

    & Refinement of graphite target production at ORAU. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B 172, 449–53 (2000).

  50. 50.

    , & Towards high-precision AMS: progress and limitations. Radiocarbon 46, 17–24 (2004).

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Brazilian financial agencies CNPq (Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico, 305079/2014-0), CAPES (Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior, 99999.005288/2014-02) and FAPERJ (Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, E-26/110.138/2014) for their support. We thank Dr Alberto Figueiredo and Dr Heloisa Coe for discussion on geological features of the studied regions.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Laboratório de Radiocarbono, Universidade Federal Fluminense, Av. Gal. Milton Tavares de Souza, s/n, Niterói, 24210-346, RJ, Brazil

    • Kita D. Macario
    •  & Fabiana M. Oliveira
  2. Oxford Radiocarbon Accelerator Unit, University of Oxford, Dyson Perrins Building, South Parks Road, Oxford, OX1 3QY, United Kingdom

    • Eduardo Q. Alves
    • , Christopher Bronk Ramsey
    •  & David Chivall
  3. Departamento de Geoquímica, Universidade Federal Fluminense, Outeiro São João Batista, s/n, Niterói, 24001-970, RJ, Brazil

    • Carla Carvalho
  4. Departamento de Biologia Marinha, Universidade Federal Fluminense, Outeiro São João Batista, s/n, Niterói, 24001-970, RJ, Brazil

    • Rosa Souza
  5. Museu de Zoologia da Universidade de São Paulo, Avenida Nazaré, 481, São Paulo, 04263-000, SP, Brazil

    • Luiz Ricardo L. Simone
    •  & Daniel C. Cavallari

Authors

  1. Search for Kita D. Macario in:

  2. Search for Eduardo Q. Alves in:

  3. Search for Carla Carvalho in:

  4. Search for Fabiana M. Oliveira in:

  5. Search for Christopher Bronk Ramsey in:

  6. Search for David Chivall in:

  7. Search for Rosa Souza in:

  8. Search for Luiz Ricardo L. Simone in:

  9. Search for Daniel C. Cavallari in:

Contributions

K.D.M. designed the study. K.D.M. and E.Q.A. led the writing of the paper. L.R.L.S., D.C.C., E.Q.A. and R.S. selected the samples from the museum collection. F.M.O. and C.C. prepared the samples in Brazil. K.D.M, E.Q.A. and D.C. prepared the samples in the UK. K.D.M. and C.B.R. were responsible for sample measurement in Brazil and UK, respectively. All authors discussed results and commented on the manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kita D. Macario.

About this article

Publication history

Received

Accepted

Published

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/srep27395

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.