Article | Open

Phase transition induced strain in ZnO under high pressure

  • Scientific Reports 6, Article number: 24958 (2016)
  • doi:10.1038/srep24958
  • Download Citation
Received:
Accepted:
Published online:

Abstract

Under high pressure, the phase transition mechanism and mechanical property of material are supposed to be largely associated with the transformation induced elastic strain. However, the experimental evidences for such strain are scanty. The elastic and plastic properties of ZnO, a leading material for applications in chemical sensor, catalyst, and optical thin coatings, were determined using in situ high pressure synchrotron axial and radial x-ray diffraction. The abnormal elastic behaviors of selected lattice planes of ZnO during phase transition revealed the existence of internal elastic strain, which arise from the lattice misfit between wurtzite and rocksalt phase. Furthermore, the strength decrease of ZnO during phase transition under non-hydrostatic pressure was observed and could be attributed to such internal elastic strain, unveiling the relationship between pressure induced internal strain and mechanical property of material. These findings are of fundamental importance to understanding the mechanism of phase transition and the properties of materials under pressure.

Introduction

Pressure induced phase transition has been considered as an important and extensively used approach in designing new materials1,2,3,4,5 and in geoscientific research6,7. For instance, under high pressure and high temperature soft graphite and carbon transform into diamond, the hardest known bulk material8,9; olivine in the deep earth transforms to spinel and result in the abnormal seismic velocity and the deep earthquake10,11. The phase transition mechanism of materials under high pressure has shown many unique features and is still under exploration12,13,14.

During a pressure induced first order solid-solid transformation, usually both phases can co-exist over a certain pressure range (transition zone). The crystal structure and lattice parameters of the new phase are different from the original phase, thus, theoretically speaking internal lattice strain should be generated during the nucleation and growth of new phase to accommodate the misfit between nucleus and matrix15. Especially, in a displacive phase transition there would be an orientation relationship between each phase and the new phase grows epitaxially on certain lattice plane of the matrix phase, thereby the lattices of each phase on the interface may be mismatched and internal strain arises16. The internal strain stemmed from lattice misfit enhances the transformation potential barrier. Thereby it affects the transformation kinetics and is assumed to be responsible for many important phenomena under pressure14,17,18,19. In addition, the phase transition induced elastic strain is usually anisotropic, making the actual microscopic deviatoric stress on material higher than external applied stress and is expected to result in plastic deformation in material19,20,21. Namely, misfit strain could soften materials during phase transition. However, such phase transition induced elastic lattice strain has not yet been well examined experimentally under high pressure, therefore it is still an ambiguous explanation for related phenomena. Whether such internal strain exists, what are the characteristics of it, how it evolves during phase transition and how mechanical property is affected are all unresolved questions.

In the present work, using in situ high pressure synchrotron x-ray diffraction, we checked the compressibility of ZnO which experiences a wurtzite-rocksalt phase transition under pressure22,23,24, identifying the transformation induced elastic strain. Moreover, the expected strength softening during phase transition of ZnO was observed under non-hydrostatic pressure.

Results and Discussions

In the axial x-ray diffraction (AXRD) experiments, the wurtzite-to-rocksalt transition starts from 10.1 GPa with increasing pressure. These two phases coexist over a pressure range of 10.1 GPa to 16.75 GPa, in good agreement with previous reports23,24,25. A typical XRD pattern and its Rietveld refinements of both wurtzite and rocksalt phases at 12.7 GPa are shown in Fig. 1. Figure 2 displays the variations of ratio d100/d002 for wurtzite phase and the ratio d200/d220 for rocksalt phase. Before phase transition the d100/d002 increases linearly with pressure, and deviates from the linear relationship in the transition zone [Fig. 2(a)], while d200/d220 decreases with pressure after the phase transition and deviates from this trend in the transition zone [Fig. 2(b)]. These observations indicate that both the wurtzite phase and rocksalt phase of ZnO are distorted in the transition zone.

Figure 1: A Rietvelt refinement of the powder x-ray diffraction pattern of ZnO under 12.7 GPa.
Figure 1

Both wurtzite and rocksalt phases are co-existed and fitted simultaneously. The inset shows the SEM image of ZnO with particle size ranges from 100 nm to 500 nm.

Figure 2
Figure 2

Pressure dependencies of ratio d100/d002 for wurtzite phase (a) and ratio d200/d220 for rocksalt phase (b). The straight lines guide for eyes.

To explore the compression behavior of each lattice plane during phase transition, we take the (111) d-spacing of Au as a reference, and the ratio is used to represent the relative value of (h k l) d-spacing of ZnO compared to the (111) d-spacing of Au. As a common pressure standard, Au is believed to display no abnormal compression discontinuity in the pressure range in this work, so any discontinuities of the variation of should be attributed to the unusual compression behavior of ZnO itself. Figure 3 shows the pressure evolution of ratio for wurtzite phase. Before the wurtzite-rocksalt phase transition,, , and all decrease monotonically with pressure. In the transition zone, evolution of shows an abnormal change, indicating an unusual compression behavior of the d-spacing of (100) plane of wurtzite ZnO, while the pressure evolutions of, and keep the linear relationships just as those before the phase transition. Furthermore, deviates to larger values from the normal linear relationship, indicating an enlarged (100) d-spacing of wurtzite phase, which result in that the ratio d100/d002 deviates to larger values, as seen in Fig. 2(a).

Figure 3
Figure 3

Relative value of d-spacings of (100) plane (a), (002) plane (b), (102) plane (c) and (103) plane (d) of wurtzite phase compared to the d-spacing of (111) plane of Au. The straight lines guide for eyes.

The pressure dependent and for rocksalt phase are presented in Fig. 4. After the phase transition completes, and decrease approximately linearly with pressure. However, in transition zone these two ratios deviate to small values from the extrapolated line from higher pressure data, indicating an internal compressive strain on (200) plane and (220) plane of rocksalt phase. The relative deviation of is more significant than that of , as a result the ratio d200/d220 of rocksalt phase deviates to smaller values, as seen in Fig. 2(b).

Figure 4
Figure 4

Relative value of d-spacings of (200) plane (a) and (220) plane (b) of rocksalt phase ZnO compared to the d-spacing of (111) plane of Au. The straight lines guide for eyes.

Limpijumnong et al.26 proposed that the wurtzite-rocksalt phase transition should follow the hexagonal path, in which the c/a ratio decreased first, and then the hexagonal angle opens up while the atoms in the center of the triangle move horizontally to the center of the square, the rocksalt phase then occurs. In this model, wurtzite phase (Fig. 5(a)) can continuously transform into rocksalt phase (Fig. 5(b)) along a simple homogeneous orthorhombic shear strain path, consequently the relative crystallographic orientation of the wurtzite and rocksalt phases with (001)wurtzite || (001)rocksalt is expected26. This phase transition model is also believed to apply to nanocrystals27 and has been validated by experimental observations28,29.

Figure 5
Figure 5

Top views of wurtzite phase (a) and rocksalt phase (b) crystal structures.

At the onset of the phase transition, the rocksalt phase grows epitaxially on the matrix of the wurtzite phase because of the crystallographic relationship of these two phases. When wurtzite and rocksalt phases occur as intimately mixed phases with an epitaxial relationship between them, each phase is subjected to a stress imposed by the other phase. As a result, each phase would be elastically deformed with respect to what it would be when the other phase were absent. As a result of the crystallographic relationship with (001)wurtzite || (001)rocksalt, the (001) plane of rocksalt phase is expected to grow epitaxially on the (001) plane of wurtzite phase. In the wurtzite-rocksalt phase transition, the rhombus-shaped unit cell projection along the [001] direction in wurtzite phase transforms to a square in rocksalt phase (Fig. 5)26. In this process the d-spacing of (100) plane of wurtzite phase needs to increase to match the (110) plane of rocksalt phase, as d110 of rocksalt phase is larger than d100 of wurtzite phase. Therefore, d100 of wurtzite phase would be stretched by the larger lattice dimension of (110) plane of rocksalt phase, while accordingly d110 (or d220) of rocksalt phase would be compressed to match the smaller lattice dimension of (100) plane of wurtzite phase. Owing to the symmetry of rocksalt phase, d200 equals to d220 and thus shows more obvious unusual compression behavior than d220 (Fig. 4), therefore the d200/d220 of rocksalt phase deviates to smaller values, as seen in Fig. 2(b).

In the initial stage of transformation, the amount of rocksalt phase is small. The lattice parameter of wurtzite phase does not deviate significantly (Fig. 3(a)) due to the relative small strained interface compared to the whole detected volume, while the deviation of lattice parameters of rocksalt phase is large (Fig. 4). For a similar reason, as the amount of the rocksalt phase is dominant near the end of transition, the deviation of lattice parameter of wurtzite phase increases and the lattice parameter deviation in rocksalt phase decreases.

To check the influence of internal strain on the plastic property of ZnO, we derive differential elastic lattice strains for both phases of ZnO from line shifts in radial X-ray diffraction (RXRD) data collected at pressure30 (Fig. 6(a)). The RXRD measurements were performed under non-hydrostatic conditions. Before the wurtzite-rocksalt phase transition, the average differential strain <Q (hkl)>, which refer the arithmetic average of measured differential strains of all lattice planes, increases with pressure. The differential strain of rocksalt ZnO also increases with pressure when the phase transition finished. But during the phase transition, <Q (hkl)> of each phase ZnO decreases steeply with pressure, indicating that plastic flow is achieved31 (Fig. 6(b)) and the strength of each phase ZnO decreases.

Figure 6
Figure 6

(a) Caked RXRD pattern of ZnO at 9.7 GPa showing detector azimuth versus 2θ. (b) Average lattice strains of wurtzite ZnO and rocksalt ZnO under pressure.

As indicated in Figs 3 and 4, the internal strain on different lattice planes vary considerably, implying that the internal strain in ZnO is significantly anisotropic and leads to the development of localized shear stress. Such internal shear stress could make the actual shear stress in ZnO reach its yield strength, resulting in the deformation of ZnO. In the perspective of energy, the strain energy resulted from the lattice misfit accompanying transformation inhibits the phase transition by counteracting the chemical free energy driving force for growth. The plastic flow may relax this internal strain and enable the growth of rocksalt phase to continue19,20. Thereby, the anisotropic internal strain during phase transition could lead to the decrease of strength.

In summary, in situ synchrotron XRD measurements under quasi-hydrostatic conditions reveal unusual compression behaviors in ZnO during the wurtzite-rocksalt phase transition, indicating the internal elastic strain on selected lattice planes. Combined with the established phase transition model of ZnO, the observed elastic strain is believed to be caused by the lattice misfit between wurtzite phase and rocksalt phase during phase transition. Additionally, the internal elastic strain is supposed to give rise to strength softening of each phase ZnO during phase transition, which is observed in the present RXRD measurements at non-hydrostatic conditions. These results supply a strong evidence for the existence of phase transition induced elastic lattice strain under pressure and indicate that such strain could have significant affect on the physical property of material.

Methods

In situ high pressure AXRD experiments were performed at room temperature, and designed to generate quasi-hydrostatic conditions by using neon as a pressure transmitting medium. Polycrystalline ZnO powder (inset in Fig. 1) with a purity of 99.99% (Aladdin Company) was pressed to a pellet with thickness about 10 μm, and then loaded into a 120-μm-diameter sample hole drilled in a rhenium gasket with 40 μm in thickness. Fine Au powder was mixed with the sample while a tiny ruby ball was loaded near the sample. The equation of state of Au32 and the ruby fluorescence shift33 were used for pressure calibrations. In the RXRD experiments an x-ray transparent boron-epoxy disc with 40 μm in thickness was used as gasket. The mixture of ZnO and gold powder was loaded into a 40-μm-diameter sample hole and the equation of state of Au32 was used for pressure calibrations. No pressure medium was used in the RXRD measurements.

The AXRD experiments were performed at the 4W2 beamline of the Beijing Synchrotron Radiation Facility (BSRF) with a wavelength of 0.6199 Å. The RXRD measurements were carried out at 16-BMD station of the High-Pressure Collaborative Access Team (HPCAT), Advanced Photon Source, Argonne National Laboratory, with a wavelength of 0.3101 Å. Diffraction patterns at various pressures were recorded with a Mar345 imaging plate detector. Collected data were analyzed for lattice parameters and differential elastic lattice strains using the programs FIT2D34 and MAUD35.

Additional Information

How to cite this article: Yan, X. et al. Phase transition induced strain in ZnO under high pressure. Sci. Rep. 6, 24958; doi: 10.1038/srep24958 (2016).

References

  1. 1.

    New materials from high-pressure experiments. Nat. Mater. 1, 19–25 (2002).

  2. 2.

    et al. Pressure-induced metallization of molybdenum disulfide. Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 036802 (2014).

  3. 3.

    et al. Pressure-induced phase transformation, reversible amorphization, and anomalous visible light response in organolead bromide perovskite. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 137, 11144–11149 (2015).

  4. 4.

    et al. Novel High-Pressure Monoclinic Metallic Phase of V2O3. Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 056401 (2014).

  5. 5.

    et al. Nanotwinned diamond with unprecedented hardness and stability. Nature 510, 250–253 (2014).

  6. 6.

    et al. Deep-focus earthquake analogs recorded at high pressure and temperature in the laboratory. Science, 341, 1377–1380 (2013).

  7. 7.

    et al. Disproportionation of (Mg, Fe)SiO4 perovskite in earth’s deep lower mantle. Science 344, 877–882 (2014).

  8. 8.

    , , , & Ultrahard polycrystalline diamond from graphite. Nature 421, 599–600 (2003).

  9. 9.

    et al. Ultrahard nanotwinned cubic boron nitride. Nature 493, 385–358 (2013).

  10. 10.

    , & Mantle phase changes and deep-earthquake faulting in subducting lithosphere. Science 252, 216–225 (1991).

  11. 11.

    , , , & Phase transformation and nanometric flow cause extreme weakening during fault slip. Nat. Geosci. 8, 484–489 (2015).

  12. 12.

    et al. Direct observation of a pressure-induced precursor lattice in silicon. Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 205503 (2012).

  13. 13.

    et al. Pressure-induced crossover between diffusive and displacive mechanisms of phase transitions in single-crystalline alpha-GeO2. Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 145503 (2003).

  14. 14.

    , , , & Neutron scattering study of the nucleation and growth process at the pressure-induced first-order phase transformation of RbI. Phys. Rev. B 33, 7770–7776 (1986).

  15. 15.

    The determination of the elastic field of a spheroidal inclusion and related problems. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 241, 376–396 (1957).

  16. 16.

    & Mechanism of the body-centered cubic–hexagonal close-packed phase transition in iron. Science 238, 780–783 (1987).

  17. 17.

    , , , & Nucleation mechanism for the direct graphite-to-diamond phase transition. Nat. Mater. 10, 693–697 (2011).

  18. 18.

    & Effect of lattice-mismatch-induced strains on coupled diffusive and displacive phase transformations. Phys. Rev. B 75, 794–802 (2007).

  19. 19.

    , , , & Effects of water on the α-β transformation kinetics in san carlos olivine. Science 281, 85–87 (1998).

  20. 20.

    , , & Strength of (mg,fe)2sio4 wadsleyite determined by relaxation of transformation stress. Phys. Earth Planet. Inter. 120, 63–78 (2000).

  21. 21.

    & The elastic strain energy associated with the olivine-spinel transformation and its implications. Phys. Earth Planet. Inter. 89, 177–197 (1995).

  22. 22.

    & New high-pressure polymorph of zinc oxide. Science 137, 993–993 (1962).

  23. 23.

    et al. Rietveld refinement study of the pressure dependence of the internal structural parameter u in the wurtzite phase of ZnO. Phys. Rev. B 71, 212103 (2005).

  24. 24.

    High-density phases of ZnO: structural and compressive parameters. Phys. Rev. B 58, 14102–14105 (1998).

  25. 25.

    & The high-pressure phase of zincite. J. Synchrot. Radiat. 2, 233–235 (1995).

  26. 26.

    & Homogeneous strain deformation path for the wurtzite to rocksalt high-pressure phase transition in GaN. Phy. Rev. Lett. 86, 91 (2001).

  27. 27.

    & Simulation of the pressure-driven wurtzite to rock salt phase transition in nanocrystals. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 8, 3304–3313 (2006).

  28. 28.

    et al. Pressure-induced structural transformations of ZnO nanowires probed by x-ray diffraction. J. Phys. Chem. C 116, 2102–2107 (2011).

  29. 29.

    & High-pressure x-ray investigation of zincite ZnO single crystals using diamond anvils with an improved shape. J. Appl. Cryst. 39, 169–175 (2006).

  30. 30.

    , , , & Analysis of lattice strains measured under nonhydrostatic pressure. J. Appl. Phys. 83, 7567–7575 (1998).

  31. 31.

    & Slab stagnation in the shallow lower mantle linked to an increase in mantle viscosity. Nat. Geosci. 8, 311–314 (2015).

  32. 32.

    et al. Toward an internally consistent pressure scale. PNAS 104, 9182–9186 (2007).

  33. 33.

    , & Calibration of the ruby pressure gauge to 800 kbar under quasi-hydrostatic conditions. J. Geophys. Res. 91, 4673–4676 (1986).

  34. 34.

    , , , & . Two-dimensional detector software: from real detector to idealised image or twotheta scan. High Press Res. 14, 235–248 (1996).

  35. 35.

    , , , & Combined texture and structure analysis of deformed limestone from time-of-flight neutron diffraction spectra. J. Appl. Phys. 81, 594–600 (1997).

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work is supported by the China 973 Program (Grant No. 2011CB808200), NSFC (Grant No. 11027405) and NSAF (Grant No. U1530402). HPCAT operations are supported by DOE-NNSA under Award No. DE-NA0001974 and DOE-BES under Award No. DE-FG02-99ER45775, with partial instrumentation funding by NSF. APS is supported by DOE-BES, under Contract No. DE-AC02-06CH11357.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Institute of Atomic and Molecular Physics, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610065, P. R. China

    • Xiaozhi Yan
    •  & Duanwei He
  2. Center for High Pressure Science and Technology Advanced Research (HPSTAR), Shanghai 201203, P. R. China

    • Xiaozhi Yan
    • , Haini Dong
    •  & Wenge Yang
  3. Key Laboratory of High-temperature and High-pressure Study of the Earth’s Interior, Institute of Geochemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guiyang, Guizhou 550081, China

    • Haini Dong
  4. Beijing Synchrotron Radiation Laboratory, Institute of High Energy Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100039, P. R. China

    • Yanchun Li
  5. HPCAT, Carnegie Institution of Washington, 9700 South Cass Avenue, Argonne, Illinois 60439, US

    • Chuanlong Lin
    •  & Changyong Park
  6. Institute of Fluid Physics and National Key Laboratory of Shockwave and Detonation Physic, China Academy of Engineering Physics, Mianyang 621900, P. R. China

    • Duanwei He
  7. High Pressure Synergetic Consortium (HPSynC), Geophysical Laboratory, Carnegie Institution of Washington, Argonne, Illinois 60439, USA

    • Wenge Yang

Authors

  1. Search for Xiaozhi Yan in:

  2. Search for Haini Dong in:

  3. Search for Yanchun Li in:

  4. Search for Chuanlong Lin in:

  5. Search for Changyong Park in:

  6. Search for Duanwei He in:

  7. Search for Wenge Yang in:

Contributions

D.W.H. and W.G.Y. conceived and designed the research; X.Z.Y., H.N.D., Y.C.L., C.L.L, C.P. and W.G.Y. conducted the experiments; X.Z.Y., W.G.Y. and D.W.H. wrote the paper.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Duanwei He or Wenge Yang.

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Creative CommonsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/