Abstract
A novel approach was developed to prepare porous carbon materials with an extremely high surface area of 2459.6 m2g−1 by using Aspergillus flavus conidia as precursors. The porous carbon serves as a superior cathode material to anchor sulfur due to its uniform and tortuous morphology, enabling high capacity and good cycle lifetime in lithium sulfur-batteries. Under a current rate of 0.2 C, the carbon-sulfur composites with 56.7 wt% sulfur loading deliver an initial capacity of 1625 mAh g−1, which is almost equal to the theoretical capacity of sulfur. The good performance may be ascribed to excellent electronic networks constructed by the high-surface-area carbon species. Moreover, the semi-closed architecture of derived carbons can effectively retard the polysulfides dissolution during charge/discharge, resulting in a capacity of 940 mAh g−1 after 120 charge/discharge cycles.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Although lithium-ion (Li-ion) batteries with high energy densities have dominated power sources of portable electronic devices, they fail to meet requirements in large-scale applications of electrical vehicles and grids because of cost, safety and capacity limitations from intercalating-type cathode materials such as LiCoO2, LiFePO4 and Li2MnO41,2,3. Researchers in battery communities aim to develop high capacity cathodes to replace the current interaction compounds. Under this circumstance, Li-air and Li-S batteries have been thus proposed and paid tremendous attention in recent years as promising alternatives to conventional Li-ion batteries4,5,6.
As a cathode material for Li-S battery, sulfur can theoretically deliver a large specific capacity of 1675 mAh g−1 and a specific energy up to 2600 Wh kg−1, almost ten times over those of intercalation compounds7. Moreover, the use of sulfur could remarkably reduce the battery cost since it is one of the most abundant elements in the earth8. Nevertheless, the low conductivity and poor cycling performance of sulfur greatly restrict its use in Li-S batteries9,10. To overcome the barriers, sulfur has been incorporated into various carbon materials such as microporous carbon11,12, carbon nanofiber13,14,15,16, carbon nanotubes17,18,19,20 and graphene21,22,23,24 to form functionalized carbon/sulfur composites for battery applications. Among them, porous carbons may act as good host matrices and help to build an electrically conductive network for sulfur cathode25,26. The pioneering work was reported by Nazar et al.27 to directly encapsulate sulfur in mesoporous carbon particles, demonstrating a relatively high capacity of about 1000 mAh g−1 for 20 cycles. The porous structures can effectively seize sulfur in carbonaceous matrices and prevent it from dissolving into the electrolyte during charge/discharge, improving the cycle life of Li-S battery28. Various approaches have been developed to synthesize carbon materials with porous structures recently. Zhao et al.29 developed a solvent-evaporation-induced coating and self-assembly way to obtain porous carbons, well confining the sulfur within the cathode region. Oschatz et al.30 achieve a unique network-like carbon hosts from poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) spheres. In addition, porous carbons made from metal organic frameworks (MOFs), as reported by Xia et al., were also confirmed to be good host matrix for sulfur31. Based on extensive efforts, the performance of Li-S batteries has been improved significantly in the past decade. However, these porous carbon materials aforementioned are still facing formidable challenges arising from their high prices and complicated synthesis procedures.
Beyond conventional methods with inorganic precursors, we herein present a unique biological approach, via using Aspergillus flavus (A. flavus) conidia for the first time, to prepare porous carbon materials with an extremely high surface area of 2459.6 m2g−1. The as-prepared carbon/sulfur composite demonstrates a high reversible capacity, good rate capability and long-term cycling stability, showing great potential in future applications of Li-S batteries.
Results
Synthesis and characterization
Geometric morphologies of CM, PCM and PCM/S were initially observed by SEM. Figure 1(a) shows a representative SEM overview of CM samples, which are evidently made of aggregated microspheres. The CM spheres with an average diameter of ~1.5 μm possess plicate and rough surfaces covered by plenty of wrinkles and folds (Fig. 1b). Clearly, after KOH activation, the plicate spheres become relatively scattered when compared to the case of CM (Fig. 1c,d)). The SEM images of PCM/S composites were displayed in Fig. 1(e,f). Distinctly from the pristine PCM, the PCM/S composites become more hardened. In comparison to the PCM, the spheres have a relatively smoother surface, which may be due to the fusion of sulfur into PCM.
The CM, PCM and PCM/S samples were further characterized by TEM. As shown in Fig. 2a, the CM well inherits the plicate texture of A. flavus conidia. After carbonized at 600 °C, highly disordered macropores can be observed in CM (Fig. 2a,b). After undergoing KOH activation, the surface of PCM becomes much slacker and rougher (Fig. 2c). The magnified TEM image (Fig. 2d) reveals that a large number of pores are homogeneously dispersed on PCM. Morphologies and microstructures of PCM/S composites were presented in Fig. 2e,f, signifying that their spherical profiles could still be remained. However, the PCM/S composites become even dense. Particularly, some fingerprint-liked structures are presented (Fig. 2f), which may be due to the successful fusion of sulfur into the PCM pores. The SEM-EDS elemental mappings were further used to characterize the sulfur distribution in the carbon materials. Obvious boundary lines of elemental C and S can be well distinguished in Fig. 3a–d, indicating that sulfur cannot enter into CM. Sulfur particles are actually covering on the spherical samples. The findings are highly in agreement with the TEM results. Figure 3e–h successively show the SEM observation and EDS elemental mapping records toward PCM/S. Clearly, sulfur has been homogeneously embedded into the PCM reservoirs.
The X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns of sulfur (red), CM (black), PCM (blue) and PCM/S (purple) samples are presented in Fig. 4a. Two broad peaks are observed in XRD patterns of CM and PCM materials. The one located at around 24o may be attributed to (002) reflection of graphitic planes. The peak at around 44o may be due to the superposition of (100) and (101) reflections of the graphitic-type lattices. The characteristic peaks of sulfur cannot be detected for PCM/S composites, suggesting that sulfur has successfully diffused into pore structures of PCM and been highly dispersed30. Raman patterns of CM (black), PCM (blue) and PCM/S (purple) composites are shown in Fig. 4b. Two peaks lying at about 1330 cm−1 and 1590 cm−1, which are respectively well known as D-band and G-band of carbon, can be found in the spectra of all samples. Generally, the D band is ascribed to the disordered graphite structure whereas the G band is denoted as the presence of crystalline graphitic carbon32. The intensity ratio (ID/IG) can be used to estimate the defective degree of carbon materials7. The ID/IG of CM, PCM, PCM/S are calculated to be 0.82, 0.95 and 0.97, respectively. The ID/IG enhancement of PCM may be attributed to the defects and highly porous structures that are created during KOH treatment33, agreeing well with the TEM observations. The ID/IG ratio of PCM/S suggests that more lattice defects are generated, which may arise from the merging of sulfur into the PCM lattice. The XPS spectra of C 1s and S 2p of PCM/S are displayed in Fig. 4(c,d). The C1s peak can be well fitted with four isolated peaks. The peak above 286 eV is assigned to the surface of amorphous carbon and the lowest environment carbon, while the one lying at around 284.5 eV indicates the existence of graphitic-type carbon, in accordance with the profile of our XRD analysis. The peak at around 285.4 eV could be attributed to the presence of sulfur-bound or aliphatic-like carbon species34. Figure 4d shows the appearance of S 2p1/2 and S 2p3/2 peaks. The position of S 2p3/2 peak is measured at about 163.8 eV, indicating the existence of sulfur-doped carbonaceous materials wherein an aromatic C−S−C type bonding is involved35. Combined with C 1s peak location aforementioned, it is highly suggested that the C-S bond could indeed exist in our PCM/S composite. Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) toward PCM/S composite was carried out under N2 atmosphere (Fig. 5) so as to confirm the content of sulfur. There is only one weight loss stage observed in TGA curve. In the temperature range from 190 °C to 430 °C, the mass loss of sulfur in the PCM/S composite is determined to be ~56.7 wt%. From Fig. S1, the mass loss of ~59.7 wt% from 180 °C to 290 °C reveals the actual content of sulfur in CM/S composite.
The BET surface area of PCM is measured to be 2459.6 m2g−1 (Fig. 6c), which is almost 10 times more than that of CM (249.0 m2g−1, see Fig. 6a). The pore size distribution of PCM (Fig. 6d) indicates that the material has a well-defined mesoporous structure with a central pore size ranging from 1.5 to 3.5 nm. In order to further prove the immersion of sulfur into porous carbon materials, the specific surface area of the PCM/S composite was also tested (Fig. 6e). The specific surface area of PCM/S composite reduced sharply from 2459.6 to 11.62 m2g−1 (Table 1). This implies that the sulfur was infiltrated into the nanoporous of the PCM and is fully consistent with our TEM and EDS results.
Electrochemical Performance
The CV of the PCM/S composite electrode is shown in Fig. 7a, with a scanning rate of 0.1 mV s −1 from the 1st to 3rd cycle. Two main reduction peaks at 2.3 V and 2.05 V are observed, respectively, which are tightly associated with the interactions between Li and sulfur according to energy-storage mechanisms in lithium-sulfur batteries8. Within a two-step discharging process, sulfur is firstly reduced to S8- (in accordance with the reduction peak at 2.3 V) and furthermore changed into S2-, as related to a reduction peak emerging at 2.05 V36,37. Figure 7b shows the charge-discharge profile of PCM/S composite under a current density of 0.2 C (1C = 1675 mA g−1) at the 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 5th, 10th and 20th cycle, respectively. The PCM/S exhibits excellent performance with an initial specific capacity of 1625 mAh g−1. This may be attributed to the good electrons conductivity of the overall hybrid system. After 20 cycles, the discharge capacity is close to 1070 mAh g−1. Also, two obvious discharge plateaus could be found in this curve, which is consistent with CV peaks described above. The rate performance of the PCM/S composite electrode is summarized in Fig. 7c. The cell was operated at five different current densities of 0.2 C, 0.3 C, 0.5 C, 1 C and 2 C in a voltage window of 1.5 ~ 3 V, respectively. As expected, PCM/S demonstrates the favorable rate performance. It achieves a discharge capacity of ~1250 mAh g−1; even at a large current density of 2 C, the discharge capacity can still reach ~900 mAh g−1. In addition to its considerable initial capacity, the PCM/S electrode also shows stable cyclic performance (Fig. 7d). The discharge capacity can be achieved up to nearly 800 mAh g−1 after 120 cycles under a current density of 0.5 C. Also for the lower current discharge test at 0.2 C, the PCM/S composite still retains 940 mAh g−1, revealing its good cycling behavior in Li-S batteries. From close observations toward cycled electrodes (Fig. S2), we found that the hybrid cathode can almost remain its original structures even after 120 cycles, unquestionably confirming its good stability in battery applications. In sharp contrast, the discharge capacity of CM/S composite is only ~300 mAh g−1 after 120 cycles at a current density of 0.5 C (Fig. S3), which highly suggests the critical role of porous structures in PCM/S electrode.
Discussion
A novel method was developed to fabricate PCM with extremely large surface areas up to 2459.6 m2g−1 by using A. flavus conidia as precursors. The experimental results suggest that the PCM material is a reliable host matrix for sulfur reservoirs because of its high surface area and rich pore structures. The PCM/S electrodes with 56.7 wt% sulfur loading exhibit higher reversible capacity, better rate capability and longer cycling lifetime in comparison to the CM/S counterparts. This may be due to a fact that PCM with adequate small pores can function as a good sulfur host, improving the sulfur utilization rate and well restraining the dissolution of polysulfides into electrolytes.
Methods
Materials preparation
A. flavus conidia were initially washed by glutaraldehyde and alcohol and then dried at room temperature for 24 h. The dried conidia were carbonized at 600 °C for 2 h with a heating rate of 2 °C min−1. The obtained carbon material from A. flavus conidia was called CM for short. To fabricate porous carbon material (PCM), the CM was grinded with KOH (wc:wKOH = 1:2) for 15 min. The mixtures were subsequently calcined at 300 °C for 1.5 h and at 750 °C for 2 h with a heating rate of 5 °C min−1 in a quartz-tube furnace under Ar atmosphere. The samples were washed with 1 M HCl and deionized water for three times, followed by drying at 80 °C for 12 h in a vacuum oven.
The combination of CM or PCM with sulfur was prepared by a simple melting diffusion way. The as-prepared CM and the sublimed S were grinded together with a mass ratio of wc:ws = 2:3. The mixture was then heated in a tubular furnace at 155 °C for 10 h at a heating rate of 3 °C min−1 under Ar atmosphere. The as-formed hybrids were called CM/S and PCM/S, respectively.
Material characterization
Crystal structures of the samples were characterized by X-ray diffractometer (Maxima-X XRD-7000) and Cu K-alpha radiation (λ = 1.5406 nm) over the 2θ range of 10°–60°. Morphology and microstructures of the as-prepared products were examined by field-emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM, JSM-7800N) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM, JEM-2100). Raman spectra were obtained using a HORIBA Scientific LabRAM HR Raman spectrometer system equipped with a 532.4 nm laser as the exciting radiation. The weight percent of sulfur was determined by thermogravimetric analyzer (TGA, Q50). X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) measurements were performed on a Thermo Scientific ESCALAB 250Xi electron spectrometer. Nitrogen adsorption−desorption isotherms and pore size distribution were characterized by Quadrasorb evo 2QDS-MP-30 (Quantachrome Instruments, USA).
Electrochemical measurements
The electrodes were fabricated by coating a slurry (75% active material, 15% carbon black and 10% polyvinylidenefluoride (PVDF) binder dissolved in N-methyl pyrolidine (NMP)) onto an aluminum foil and then dried in vacuum at 55 °C for 15 h. CR3025 coin cells were used and assembled in an argon-filled glove box. Li foil was utilized as the counter electrode. The electrolyte was 1 M bis(trifluoromethane) sulfonimide lithium salt (LiTFSI) dissolved in a mixture of 1,3-dioxolane (DOL) and dimethoxymethane (DME) with a volume ratio of 1:1, with 0.1 M LiNO3 as the electrolyte additive. All cells were aged for several hours before charge–discharge to ensure the adequate penetration of electrolyte into the electrode. The cells were galvanostatically charged and discharged between 1.5 V and 3 V (versus Li/Li+) using a Land instruments testing system.
Additional Information
How to cite this article: Xu, M. et al. Aspergillus flavus Conidia-derived Carbon/Sulfur Composite as a Cathode Material for High Performance Lithium–Sulfur Battery. Sci. Rep. 6, 18739; doi: 10.1038/srep18739 (2016).
References
Larcher, D. et al. Recent findings and prospects in the field of pure metals as negative electrodes for Li-ion batteries. J. Mater.Chem. 17, 3759–3772 (2007).
Whittingham, M. S. Lithium Batteries and Cathode Materials. Chem. Rev. 104, 4271–4301 (2004).
Etacheri, V., Marom, R., Elazari, R., Salitra, G. & Aurbach, D. Challenges in the development of advanced Li-ion batteries: a review. Energy Environ.Sci. 4, 3243–3262 (2011).
Armand, M. & Tarascon, J. M. Building better batteries. Nature. 451, 652–657 (2008).
Zhang, B. et al. Novel Hierarchically Porous Carbon Materials Obtained from Natural Biopolymer as Host Matrixes for Lithium−Sulfur Battery Applications. Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 6, 13174–13182 (2014).
Liang, C., Dudney, N. J. & Howe, J. Y. Hierarchically Structured Sulfur/Carbon Nanocomposite Material for High-Energy Lithium Battery. Chem. Mater. 21, 4724–4730 (2009).
Li, Y. et al. Sulfur-nitrogen doped multi walled carbon nanotubes composite as a cathode material for lithium sulfur batteries. Int. J. Hydrogen Energ. 39, 16073–16080 (2014).
Li, X. et al. Tailoring interactions of carbon and sulfur in Li–S battery cathodes: significant effects of carbon–heteroatom bonds. J. Mater. Chem. A. 2, 12866–12872 (2014).
Seh, Z. W. et al. Sulphur–TiO2 yolk–shell nanoarchitecture with internal void space for long-cycle lithium–sulphur batteries. Nat. Commun. 4, 1331 (2013).
Gao, X., Li, J., Guan, D. & Yuan, C. A Scalable Graphene Sulfur Composite Synthesis for Rechargeable Lithium Batteries with Good Capacity and Excellent Columbic Efficiency. Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 6, 4154–4159 (2014).
Xin, S. et al. Smaller sulfur molecules promise better lithium-sulfur batteries. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 134, 18510–18513 (2012).
Oschatz, M. et al. Micro- and mesoporous carbide-derived carbon prepared by a sacrificial template method in high performance lithium sulfur battery cathodes. J. Mater. Chem. A. 2, 17649–17654 (2014).
Zheng, G. et al. Amphiphilic Surface Modification of Hollow Carbon Nanofibers for Improved Cycle Life of Lithium Sulfur Batteries. Nano Lett. 13, 1256–1270 (2013).
Zeng, L. et al. Free-standing porous carbon nanofibers–sulfur composite for flexible Li–S battery cathode. Nanoscale. 6, 9579–9587 (2014).
Zu, C., Fu, Y. & Manthiram, A. Highly reversible Li/dissolved polysulfide batteries with binder-free carbon nanofiber electrodes. J. Mater. Chem. A. 1, 10362–10367 (2013).
Miao, L., Wang, W., Yuan, K., Yang, Y. & Wang, A. A lithium–sulfur cathode with high sulfur loading and high capacity per area: a binder-free carbon fiber cloth–sulfur material. Chem. Commun. 50, 13231–13234 (2014).
Wang, G., Lai, Y., Zhang, Z., Li, J. & Zhang, Z. Enhanced rate capability and cycle stability of lithium–sulfur batteries with a bifunctional MCNT@PEG-modified separator. J. Mater. Chem. A. 3, 7139–7144 (2015).
Sun, L. et al. Sulfur Nanocrystals Confined in Carbon Nanotube Network As a Binder-Free Electrode for High-Performance Lithium Sulfur Batteries. Nano Lett. 14, 4044–4049 (2014).
Su, Y.-S. & Manthiram, A. A new approach to improve cycle performance of rechargeable lithium–sulfur batteries by inserting a free-standing MWCNT interlayer. Chem. Commun. 48, 8817–8819 (2012).
Wang, C. et al. Sulfur–amine chemistry-based synthesis of multiwalled carbon nanotube–sulfur composites for high performance Li–S batteries. Chem. Commun. 50, 1202–1204 (2014).
Li, L. et al. Enhanced Cycling Stability of Lithium Sulfur Batteries Using Sulfur− Polyaniline−Graphene Nanoribbon Composite Cathodes. Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 6, 15033–15039 (2014).
Kim, H., Lim, H.-D., Kima, J. & Kang, K. Graphene for advanced Li/S and Li/air batteries. J. Mater. Chem. A. 2, 33–47 (2014).
You, Y. et al. Hierarchically micro/mesoporous activated graphene with a large surface area for high sulfur loading in Li–S batteries. J. Mater. Chem. A. 3, 4799–4802 (2015).
Xu, H. et al. Graphene-encapsulated sulfur (GES) composites with a core–shell structure as superior cathode materials for lithium–sulfur batteries. J. Mater. Chem. A. 1, 15142–15149 (2013).
Zhang, L. et al. Preparation of a macroscopic, robust carbon-fiber monolith from filamentous fungi and its application in Li–S batteries. Green Chem. 16, 3926–3934 (2014).
Sohn, H. et al. Porous Spherical Carbon/Sulfur Nanocomposites by Aerosol-Assisted Synthesis: The Effect of Pore Structure and Morphology on Their Electrochemical Performance As Lithium/Sulfur Battery Cathodes. Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 6, 7596–7606 (2014).
Ji, X., Lee, K. T. & Nazar, L. F. A highly ordered nanostructured carbon–sulphur cathode for lithium–sulphur batteries. Nat. Mater. 8, 500–506 (2009).
Zheng, G., Yang, Y., Cha, J. J., Hong, S. S. & Cui, Y. Hollow Carbon Nanofiber-Encapsulated Sulfur Cathodes for High Specific Capacity Rechargeable Lithium Batteries. Nano. Lett. 11, 4462–4467 (2011).
Xue, C., Tu, B. & Zhao, D. Evaporation-Induced Coating and Self-Assembly of Ordered Mesoporous Carbon-Silica Composite Monoliths with Macroporous Architecture on Polyurethane Foams. Adv. Funct. Mater. 18, 3914–3921 (2008).
Xu, G. et al. Sulfur embedded in metal organic framework-derived hierarchically porous carbon nanoplates for high performance lithium–sulfur battery. J. Mater. Chem. A. 1, 4490–4496 (2013).
Xia, W., Qiu, B., Xia, D. & Zou, R. Facile preparation of hierarchically porous carbons from metal-organic gels and their application in energy storage. Scientific. Reports. 3, 1935–1941 (2013)
Jiang, J. et al. Evolution of disposable bamboo chopsticks into uniform carbon fibers: a smart strategy to fabricate sustainable anodes for Li-ion batteries. Energy Environ. Sci. 7, 2670–2679 (2014).
Korenblit, Y. et al. High-Rate Electrochemical Capacitors Based on Ordered Mesoporous Silicon Carbide-Derived Carbon. ACS Nano. 4, 1337–1344 (2010).
Li, G. et al. Acacia Senegal–Inspired Bifunctional Binder for Longevity of Lithium–Sulfur Batteries. Adv. Energy Mater. 1500878 (2015).
See, K. A. et al. Sulfur-Functionalized Mesoporous Carbons as Sulfur Hosts in Li−S Batteries: Increasing the Affinity of Polysulfide Intermediates to Enhance Performance. Appl.Mater.Interfaces. 6, 10908–10916 (2014).
Wang, J.-Z. et al. Sulfur-graphene composite for rechargeable lithium batteries. J. Power Sources. 196, 7030–7034 (2011).
Jiang, J. et al. Encapsulation of sulfur with thin-layered nickel-based hydroxides for long-cyclic lithium–sulfur cells, Nat. Commun. 6, 8622 (2015).
Acknowledgements
This work is financially supported by National Program on Key Basic Research Project of China (973 Program) under contract No.2013CB127804. Chongqing Key Laboratory for Advanced Materials and Technologies of Clean Energies under cstc2011pt-sy90001. The work is supported by grants from Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (SWU 113079, XDJK2014C051). Z.S. Lu would like to thank the supports by the Specialized Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education (RFDP) (Grant No. 20130182120025), Young Core Teacher Program of the Municipal Higher Educational Institution of Chongqing and Chongqing Natural Science Foundation (cstc2012jjA1137). J. Jiang would like to thank the supports by Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (SWU 115027, XDJK2016C002).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
M.X. and Z.L. designed the experiments. M.J. performed the experiments and M.X. and M.J. prepared the manuscript. S.L. prepared Figure 1 and S.B. prepared Figure 2 C.M. provide the precursor for A. flavus conidias. M.X., M.J., C.M., S.L., J.J., Y.L. and Z.L. reviewed the manuscript.
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Electronic supplementary material
Rights and permissions
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
About this article
Cite this article
Xu, M., Jia, M., Mao, C. et al. Aspergillus flavus Conidia-derived Carbon/Sulfur Composite as a Cathode Material for High Performance Lithium–Sulfur Battery. Sci Rep 6, 18739 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/srep18739
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/srep18739
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.