Abstract
In quantum gravity, several approaches have been proposed until now for the quantum description of discrete geometries. These theoretical frameworks include loop quantum gravity, causal dynamical triangulations, causal sets, quantum graphity, and energetic spin networks. Most of these approaches describe discrete spaces as homogeneous network manifolds. Here we define Complex Quantum Network Manifolds (CQNM) describing the evolution of quantum network states, and constructed from growing simplicial complexes of dimension . We show that in d = 2 CQNM are homogeneous networks while for d > 2 they are scalefree i.e. they are characterized by large inhomogeneities of degrees like most complex networks. From the selforganized evolution of CQNM quantum statistics emerge spontaneously. Here we define the generalized degrees associated with the faces of the dimensional CQNMs, and we show that the statistics of these generalized degrees can either follow FermiDirac, Boltzmann or BoseEinstein distributions depending on the dimension of the faces.
Introduction
Several theoretical approaches have been proposed in quantum gravity for the description and characterization of quantum discrete spaces including loop quantum gravity^{1,2,3}, causal dynamical triangulations^{4,5}, causal sets^{6,7}, quantum graphity^{8,9,10}, energetic spin networks^{11,12}, and diffusion processes on such quantum geometries^{13}. In most of these approaches, the discrete spaces are network manifold with homogeneous degree distribution and do not have common features with complex networks describing complex systems such as the brain or the biological networks in the cell. Nevertheless it has been discussed^{14} that a consistent theory of quantum cosmology could also be a theory of selforganization^{15,16}, sharing some of its dynamical properties with complex systems and biological evolution.
In the last decades, the field of network theory^{17,18,19,20,21} has made significant advances in the understanding of the underlying network topology of complex systems as diverse as the biological networks in the cell, the brain networks, or the Internet. Therefore an increasing interest is addressed to the study of quantum gravity from the information theory and complex network perspective^{22,23}.
In network theory it has been found that scalefree networks^{24} characterizing highly inhomogeneous network structures are ubiquitous and characterize biological, technological and social systems^{17,18,19,20}. Scalefree networks have finite average degree but infinite fluctuation of the degree distribution and in these structures nodes (also called “hubs”) with a number of connections much bigger than the average degree emerge. Scalefree networks are known to be robust to random perturbation and there is a significant interplay between structure and dynamics, since critical phenomena such as in the Ising model, synchronization or epidemic spreading change their phase diagram when defined on them^{25,26}.
Interestingly, it has been shown that such networks, when they are evolving by a dynamics inspired by biological evolution, can be described by the BoseEinstein statistics, and they might undergo a BoseEinstein condensation in which a node is linked to a finite fraction of all the nodes of the network^{27}. Similarly evolving Cayley trees have been shown to follow a FermiDirac distribution^{28,29}.
Recently, in the field of complex networks increasing attention is devoted to the characterization of the geometry of complex networks^{30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39}. In this context, special attention has been addressed to simplicial complexes^{40,41,42,43,44}, i.e. structures formed by gluing together simplices such as triangles, tetrahedra etc.
Here we focus our attention on Complex Quantum Network Manifolds (CQNMs) of dimension d constructed by gluing together simplices of dimension d. The CQNMs grow according to a nonequilibrium dynamics determined by the energies associated to its nodes, and have an emergent geometry, i.e. the geometry of the CQNM is not imposed a priori on the network manifold, but it is determined by its stochastic dynamics. Following a similar procedure as used in several other manuscripts^{8,9,10,41}, one can show that the CQNMs characterize the time evolution of the quantum network states. In particular, each network evolution can be considered as a possible path over which the path integral characterizing the quantum network states can be calculated. Here we show that in d = 2 CQNMs are homogeneous and have an exponential degree distribution while the CQNMs are always scalefree for d > 2. Therefore for d = 2 the degree distribution of the CQNM has bounded fluctuations and is homogeneous while for d = 2 the CQNM has unbounded fluctuations in the degree distribution and its structure is dominated by hub nodes. Moreover, in CQNM quantum statistics emerges spontaneously from the network dynamics. In fact, here we define the generalized degrees of the faces forming the manifold and we show that the average of the generalized degrees of the faces with energy follows different statistics (FermiDirac, Boltzmann or BoseEinstein statistics) depending on the dimensionality of the faces and on the dimensionality of the CQNM. For example in d = 2 the average of the generalized degree of the links follows a FermiDirac distribution and the average of the generalized degrees of the nodes follows a Boltzmann distribution. In d = 3 the faces of the tetrahedra, the links and the nodes have an average of their generalized degree that follows respectively the FermiDirac distribution, the Boltzmann distribution and the BoseEinstein distribution.
Consider a dimensional simplicial complex formed by gluing together simplices of dimension , i.e. a triangle for d = 2, a tetrahedron for d = 3 etc. A necessary requirement for obtaining a discretization of a manifold is that each simplex of dimension can be glued to another simplex only in such a way that the (d−1)faces formed by (d−1)dimensional simplices (links in d = 2, triangles in d = 3, etc.) belong at most to two simplices of dimension .
Here we indicate with the set of all faces belonging to the dimensional manifold with δ < d. If a (d−1)face belongs to two simplices of dimension we will say that it is “saturated” and we indicate this by an associated variable ξ_{α} with value ξ_{α }= 0; if it belongs to only one simplicial complex of dimension we will say that it is “unsaturated” and we will indicate this by setting ξ_{α }= 1.
The CQNM is evolving according to a nonequilibrium dynamics described in the following.
To each node i = 1, 2…, N an energy of the node _{i} is assigned from a distribution . The energy of the node is quenched and does not change during the evolution of the network. To every face we associate an energy given by the sum of the energy of the nodes that belong to the face α,
At time t = 1 the CQNM is formed by a single dimensional simplex. At each time t > 1 we add a simplex of dimension to an unsaturated (d−1)face of dimension d−1. We choose this simplex with probability Πα given by
where β is a parameter of the model called inverse temperature and Z is a normalization sum given by
Having chosen the (d−1)face α, we glue to it a new ddimensional simplex containing all the nodes of the (d−1)face α plus the new node i. It follows that the new node i is linked to each node j belonging to α.
In Fig. 1 we show few steps of the evolution of a CQNM for the case d = 2, while in Fig. 2 we show examples of CQNM in d = 2 and in d = 3 for different values of β.
From the definition of the nonequilibrium dynamics described above, it is immediate to show that the network structure constructed by this nonequilibrium dynamics is connected and is a discrete manifold.
Since at time t the number of nodes of the network manifold is N = t + d, the evolution of the network manifold is fully determined by the sequence , and the sequence , where , for i ≤ d + 1 indicates the energy of an initial node, while for with it indicates the energy of the node added at time , and where indicates the (d−1)face to which the new dimensional simplex is added at time .
The dynamics described above is inspired by biological evolutionary dynamics and is related to selforganized critical models. In fact the case is dictated by an extremal dynamics that can be related to invasion percolation^{28,45}, while the case β = 0 can be identified as an Eden model^{46} on a dimensional simplicial complex.
Here we call these network manifolds Complex Quantum Network Manifolds because using similar arguments already developed in^{8,9,10,41} it can be shown that they describe the evolution of Quantum Network States (see Methods and Supplementary Information for details). The quantum network state is an element of an Hilbert space H_{tot} associated to a simplicial complex of N nodes formed by gluing dimensional simplices (see Methods and Supplementary Information for details). The quantum network state evolves through a Markovian nonequilibrium dynamics determined by the energies of the nodes. The quantity Z(t) enforcing the normalization of the quantum network state can be interpreted as a path integral over CQNM evolutions determined by the sequences and . In fact we have
where the explicit expression of is given in the Supplementary Information. Moreover, Z(t) can be interpreted as the partition function of the statistical mechanics problem over the CQNM temporal evolutions. If we identify the sequences and , determining Z(t) with the sequences indicating the temporal evolution of the CQNM we have that the probability of a given CQNM evolution is given by
Therefore each classical evolution of the CQNM up to time t corresponds to one of the paths defining the evolution of the quantum network state up to time t.
A set of important structural properties of the CQNM are the generalized degrees of its faces. Given a CQNM of dimension , the generalized degree of a given face , (i.e. ) is defined as the number of dimensional simplices incident to it. For example, in a CQNM of dimension d = 2, the generalized degree k_{2,1}(α) is the number of triangles incident to a link while the generalized degree k_{2,0}(α) indicates the number of triangles incident to a node α. Similarly in a CQNM of dimension d = 3, the generalized degrees k_{3,2,} k_{3,2} and k_{3,0} indicate the number of tetrahedra incident respectively to a triangular face, a link or a node. If from a CQNM of dimension one extracts the underlying network, the degree K_{d}(i) of node i is given by the generalized degree K_{d,0}(i) of the same node plus d−1, i.e.
We indicate with the distribution of generalized degrees k_{d,δ }= k. It follows that the degree distribution of the network constructed from the ddimensional CQNM is given by
Let us consider the generalized degree distribution of CQNM in the case β = 0. In this case the new ddimensional simplex can be added with equal probability to each unsaturated (d−1)face of the CQNM. Here we show that as long as the dimension d is greater than two, i.e. d > 2, the CQNM is a scalefree network. In fact each face, with , which has generalized degree , is incident to
unsaturated (d−1)faces. Therefore the probability to attach a new dimensional simplex to a face with generalized degree and with δ < d−1, is given by.
Therefore, as long as δ < d − 2, the generalized degree increases dynamically due to an effective “linear preferential attachment^{24}”, according to which the generalized degree of a δface increases at each time by one, with a probability increasing linearly with the current value of its generalized degree. Since the preferential attachment is a wellknown mechanism for generating scalefree distributions, it follows, by putting δ = 0, that we expect that as long as the CQNMs are scalefree. Instead, in the case d = 2, by putting δ = 0 it is immediate to see that the probability is independent of the generalized degree of the face (node) α, and therefore there is no “effective preferential attachment”. We expect therefore^{17} that the CQNM in d = 2 has an exponential degree distribution, i.e. in d = 2 we expect to observe homogeneous CQNM with bounded fluctuations in the degree distribution. These arguments can be made rigorous by solving the master equation^{19}, and deriving the exact asymptotic generalized degree distributions for every δ < d (see Methods and Supplementary Information for details). For δ = d − 1 we find a bimodal distribution
For instead, we find an exponential distribution, i.e.
Therefore in d = 2, the CQNMs have an exponential degree distribution that can be derived from Eq. (11) and Eq. (7). Finally for 0 ≤ δ < d − 2 we have the distribution
It follows that for 0 ≤ δ < d − 2 and the generalized degree distribution follows a powerlaw with exponent , i.e.
and
The distribution given by Eq. (12) is scalefree if an only if . Using Eq. (14) we observe that for d ≥ 3 and δ = 0 we observe that the distribution of generalized degrees is always scalefree. Therefore the degree distribution given by Eq. (7), for large values of the degree K and for d ≥ 3 is scalefree and goes like
with
Therefore, for d = 3 the CQNMs have and for they have powerlaw exponent .
These theoretical expectations perfectly fit the simulation results of the model as can been seen in Fig. 3 where the distribution of generalized degrees P_{3,1}(k) and P_{3,0}(k) observed in the simulations for β = 0 are compared with the theoretical expectations.
In the case β > 0 the distributions of the generalized degrees depend on the density of dimensional simplices with energy in a CQNM and are parametrized by selfconsistent parameters called the chemical potentials, indicated as and defined in the Supplementary Information.
Here we suppose that these chemical potentials exist and that the density is given, and we find the selfconsistent equations that they need to satisfy at the end of the derivation. Using the master equation approach^{19} we obtain that for the generalized degree follows the distribution
while for δ = d − 2 it follows
Finally for the generalized degree is given by
It follows that also for β > 0 the CQNMs in d > 2 are scalefree. Interestingly, we observe that the average of the generalized degrees of simplices with energy follows the FermiDirac distribution for δ = d − 2, the Boltzmann distribution for δ = d − 2 and the BoseEinstein distribution for δ = d > 2. In fact we have,
where , is proportional to the Boltzmann distribution and , indicate respectively the FermiDirac and BoseEinstein occupation numbers^{47}. In particular we have
These results suggest that the dimension d = 3 of CQNM is the minimal one necessary for observing at the same time scalefree CQNMs and the simultaneous emergence of the FermiDirac, Boltzmann and BoseEinstein distributions. In particular in d = 3 the average generalized degree of triangles of energy follows the FermiDirac distribution, the average of the generalized degree of links of energy follows the Boltzmann distribution, while the generalized degree of nodes of energy follows the BoseEinstein distribution.
Finally the chemical potentials , if they exist, can be found selfconsistently by imposing the condition.
dictated by the geometry of the CQNM, which implies the following selfconsistent relations for the chemical potentials
In Fig. 4 we compare the simulation results with the theoretical predictions given by Eqs. (20) finding very good agreement for sufficiently low values of the inverse temperature β. The disagreement occurring at large value of the inverse temperature β is due to the fact that the selfconsistent Eqs. (23)–(25), , do not always give a solution for the chemical potentials . In particular the CQNM with can undergo a BoseEinstein condensation when Eq. (25) cannot be satisfied. When the transition occurs for the generalized degree with , the maximal degree in the network increases linearly in time similarly to the scenario described in^{27}.
In summary, we have shown that Complex Quantum Manifolds in dimension d > 2 are scalefree, i. e. they are characterized by large fluctuations of the degrees of the nodes. Moreover the faces with follow the FermiDirac, Boltzmann or BoseEinstein distributions depending on the dimensions and . In particular for d = 3, we find that triangular faces follow the FermiDirac distribution, links follow the Boltzmann distribution and nodes follow the BoseEinstein distribution. Interestingly, we observe that the dimension d = 3 is not only the minimal dimension for having a scalefree CQNM, but it is also the minimal dimension for observing the simultaneous emergence of the FermiDirac, Boltzmann or BoseEinstein distributions in CQNMs.
Methods
Quantum network states
The Quantum Network State is an element of an Hilbert space H_{tot} associated to a simplicial complex formed by gluing dimensional simplices of nodes. This Hilbert space is given by
with indicating the maximum number of (d−1)dimensional simplices in a network of nodes. Here a Hilbert space is associated to each possible node of the simplicial complex, and two Hilbert spaces and are associated to each possible (d−1)dimensional simplex of a network of nodes. The Hilbert space is the one of a fermionic oscillator of energy , with basis , with . These states can be mapped respectively to the presence () or the absence () of a node of energy in the simplicial complex. We indicate with respectively the fermionic creation and annihilation operators acting in this space. The Hilbert space associated to a (d−1) simplex is the Hilbert space of a fermionic oscillator with basis , with . The quantum number is mapped to the presence of the simplex in the network while the quantum number is mapped to the absence of such a simplex. We indicate with respectively the fermionic creation and annihilation operators acting in this space. Finally the Hilbert space associated to a (d−1) simplex is the Hilbert space of a fermionic oscillator with basis , with . We indicate with respectively the fermionic creation and annihilation operators acting in this space. The quantum number is mapped to a saturated simplex, i. e. incident to two dimensional simplices, while the quantum number is mapped either to an unsaturated simplex (if also ) or to the absence of such a simplex (if .
A quantum network state can therefore be decomposed as
where with we indicated all the possible (d−1)faces of the CQNM of nodes.
We assume that the quantum network state follows a Markovian evolution as it has been proposed already in the literature^{8,41}. In particular we assume that at time t = 1 the state is given by
with enforcing the normalization condition . The quantum network state at each time is updated according to the Markov chain
with the unitary operator given by
where indicates the set of all the simplices formed by the node and a subset of the nodes in . The quantity present in the definition of the unitary operator enforces the normalization condition and can be interpreted as a path integral over CQNM evolutions determined by the sequence of the energy values of the nodes added at time and the energy values , together with the sequence of the faces where the new dimensional simplex is added at time . In fact we have.
where the probability of a given CQNM evolution is given by
For the exact expression of see the Supplementary Information.
Generalized degree distribution for β = 0
The average number of faces of a dimensional CQNM of generalized degree that are incident to the new dimensional simplex at a given time t is given, for , by
where indicates the Kronecker delta while for δ < d − 1 is given by,
Using Eqs. (32), (33) and the master equation approach, it is possible to derive the exact distribution for the generalized degrees. We indicate with the average number of faces that at time have generalized degree . The master equation for reads
with k ≥ 1. The master equation can be solved by observing that for large times we have where is the generalized degree distribution. In this way Eqs. (10)–(12), , are obtained.
Generalized degree distribution for β = 0
For β > 0 the probability that a given face of energy and generalized degree increases its generalized degree by one at time can be expressed in terms of selfconsistent parameters called chemical potentials and defined in the Supplementary Material. Using these probabilities the master equations can be written for the average number of faces that at time have generalized degree and energy . These equations can be solved similarly to the case β = 0 obtaining for the generalized degree distributions Eqs. (17)–(19), , .
Additional Information
How to cite this article: Bianconi, G. and Rahmede, C. Complex Quantum Network Manifolds in Dimension d>2 are ScaleFree. Sci. Rep. 5, 13979; doi: 10.1038/srep13979 (2015).
References
 1.
Rovelli, C. & Smolin, L. Discreteness of area and volume in quantum gravity. Nuclear Physics B 442, 593–619 (1995).
 2.
Rovelli, C. & Smolin, L. Loop space representation of quantum general relativity. Nuclear Physics B 331, 80–152 (1990).
 3.
Rovelli, C. & Vidotto, F. Covariant Loop Quantum Gravity (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2015).
 4.
Ambjorn, J., Jurkiewicz, J. & Loll, R. Reconstructing the universe. Phys. Rev. D 72, 064014 (2005).
 5.
Ambjorn, J., Jurkiewicz, J. & Loll, R. Emergence of a 4D world from causal quantum gravity. Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 131301 (2004).
 6.
Rideout, D. P. & Sorkin, R. D. Classical sequential growth dynamics for causal sets. Phys. Rev. D 61, 024002 (1999).
 7.
Eichhorn, A. & Mizera, S. Spectral dimension in causal set quantum gravity. Class. Quant. Grav. 31, 125007 (2014).
 8.
Antonsen, F. Random graphs as a model for pregeometry. International Journal of Theoretical Physics, 33, 1189–1205 (1994).
 9.
Konopka, T., Markopoulou, F. & Severini, S. Quantum graphity: a model of emergent locality. Phys. Rev. D 77, 104029 (2008).
 10.
Hamma, A., Markopoulou, F., Lloyd, S., Caravelli, F., Severini, S. & Markström, K. Quantum BoseHubbard model with an evolving graph as a toy model for emergent spacetime. Phys. Rev. D 81, 104032 (2010).
 11.
Cortês, M. & Smolin, L. Phys. Rev. D 90, 084007 (2014).
 12.
Cortês, M. & Smolin, L. Phys. Rev. D, 90, 044035 (2014).
 13.
Calcagni, G., Eichhorn, A. & Saueressig, F. Probing the quantum nature of spacetime by diffusion. Phys. Rev. D 87 124028 (2013).
 14.
Smolin, L. The life of the cosmos. (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1997).
 15.
Bak, P. & Sneppen, K. Punctuated equilibrium and criticality in a simple model of evolution. Phys. Rev. Lett. 71, 4083–4086 (1993).
 16.
Jensen, H. J. Selforganized criticality: emergent complex behavior in physical and biological systems. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1998).
 17.
Albert, R. & Barabási, A.L. Statistical mechanics of complex networks. Rev. Mod. Phys. 74, 47–97 (2002).
 18.
Newman, M. E. J. Networks: An introduction. (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2010).
 19.
Dorogovtsev, S. N. & Mendes, J. F. F. Evolution of networks: From biological nets to the Internet and WWW. (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2003).
 20.
Boccaletti, S., Latora, V., Moreno, Y., Chavez, M. & Hwang, D. H. Complex networks: Structure and dynamics. Phys. Rep. 424, 175–308 (2006).
 21.
Caldarelli, G. Scalefree networks:complex webs in nature and technology. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2007).
 22.
Krioukov, D., Kitsak, M., Sinkovits, R. S., Rideout, D., Meyer, D. & Boguñá, M. Network Cosmology. Scientific Reports 2, 793 (2012).
 23.
C. A. Trugenberger, C. A. Quantum Gravity as an Information Network: SelfOrganization of a 4D Universe. arXiv preprint. arXiv:1501.01408 (2015).
 24.
Barabási, A.L. & Albert, R. Emergence of scaling in random networks. Science 286, 509–512 (1999).
 25.
Dorogovtsev, S. N., Goltsev, A. V. & Mendes, J. F. F. Critical phenomena in complex networks. Rev. Mod. Phys. 80, 1275 (2008).
 26.
Barrat, A., Barthelemy, M. & Vespignani, A. Dynamical processes on complex networks. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2008).
 27.
Bianconi, G. & Barabási, A.L. BoseEinstein condensation in complex networks. Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 5632–5635 (2001).
 28.
Bianconi, G. Growing Cayley trees described by a Fermi distribution. Phys. Rev. E 66, 036116 (2002).
 29.
Bianconi, G. Quantum statistics in complex networks. Phys. Rev. E 66, 056123 (2002).
 30.
Aste, T., Di Matteo, T. & Hyde, S. T. Complex networks on hyperbolic surfaces. Physica A 346, 20–26 (2005).
 31.
Kleinberg, R. Geographic routing using hyperbolic space. In INFOCOM 2007. 26th IEEE International Conference on Computer Communications. IEEE. 1902–1909 (2007).
 32.
Boguñá, M., Krioukov, D. & Claffy, K. C. Navigability of complex networks. Nature Physics 5, 74–80 (2008).
 33.
Krioukov, D., Papadopoulos, F., Kitsak, M., Vahdat, A. & Boguñá, M. Hyperbolic geometry of complex networks. Phys. Rev. E 82 036106 (2010).
 34.
Narayan, O. & Saniee, I. Largescale curvature of networks. Phys. Rev. E 84, 066108 (2011).
 35.
Taylor, D., Klimm, F., Harrington, H. A., Kramar, M., Mischaikow, K., Porter, M. A. & Mucha, P. J. Complex contagions on noisy geometric networks. arXiv preprint. arXiv:1408.1168 (2014).
 36.
Aste, T., Gramatica, R., & Di Matteo, T. Exploring complex networks via topological embedding on surfaces. Phys. Rev. E 86, 036109 (2012).
 37.
Petri, G., Scolamiero, M., Donato, I. & Vaccarino, F. Topological strata of weighted complex networks. PloS One 8, e66506 (2013).
 38.
Petri, G., Expert, P., Turkheimer, F., CarhartHarris, R., Nutt, D., Hellyer, P. J. & Vaccarino, F. Homological scaffolds of brain functional networks. Journal of The Royal Society Interface 11, 20140873 (2014).
 39.
Borassi, M., Chessa, A. & Caldarelli, G. Hyperbolicity Measures Democracy in RealWorld Networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:1503.03061 (2015).
 40.
Wu, Z., Menichetti, G., Rahmede, C. & Bianconi, G. Emergent network geometry. Scientific Reports, 5, 10073 (2015).
 41.
Bianconi, G., Rahmede, C. & Wu, Z. Complex quantum network geometries: Evolution and phase transitions Phys. Rev. E 92, 022815 (2015).
 42.
Costa, A. & Farber, M. Random Simplicial complexes. arXiv preprint. arxiv:1412.5805 (2014).
 43.
Kahle, M. Topology of random simplicial complexes: a survey. AMS Contemp. Math 620, 201–222 (2014).
 44.
Zuev, K., Eisenberg, O. & Krioukov, D. Exponential Random Simplical Complexes, arXiv:1502.05032 (2015).
 45.
Wilkinson, D. & Willemsen, J. F. Invasion percolation: a new form of percolation theory. Journal of Physics A 16, 3365–3376 (1983).
 46.
Barabási, A.L. Fractal concepts in surface growth. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1995).
 47.
Kardar, M. Statistical physics of particles. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2007).
Acknowledgements
This work has been supported by SUPERSTRIPES Institute.
Author information
Affiliations
School of Mathematical Sciences, Queen Mary University of London, London E1 4NS, United Kingdom
 Ginestra Bianconi
Institute for Theoretical Physics, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, 76128 Karlsruhe, Germany
 Christoph Rahmede
Authors
Search for Ginestra Bianconi in:
Search for Christoph Rahmede in:
Contributions
G.B. and C.R. designed the research, G.B. wrote the codes, prepared figures. G.B. and C.R. wrote the main manuscript text.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Corresponding author
Correspondence to Ginestra Bianconi.
Supplementary information
PDF files
Rights and permissions
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
About this article
Further reading

1.
Complex Network Geometry and Frustrated Synchronization
Scientific Reports (2018)

2.
Network Geometry and Complexity
Journal of Statistical Physics (2018)

3.
Machine learning meets complex networks via coalescent embedding in the hyperbolic space
Nature Communications (2017)

4.
Emergent Hyperbolic Network Geometry
Scientific Reports (2017)

5.
Cosmological flux noise and measured noise power spectra in SQUIDs
Scientific Reports (2016)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.