Introduction

In food manufacturing and packaging industries, antimicrobials play a pivotal role in ensuring the safety of perishable food products such as dairy and meat products1. These products require protection from the growth of spoilage and pathogenic bacteria throughout the different stages of preparation, storage, and distribution to achieve the desired shelf life2. And such foods are consistently susceptible to acquiring and harboring foodborne pathogens from the farm to the consumer’s table1,2. However, in response to the imperative of seeking alternative strategies to combat the global challenge of antimicrobial resistance (AMR)1,3 and driven by the evident shift in consumer preferences towards food production systems that are both health-conscious and environmentally sustainable, a noteworthy trend has emerged. This trend has catalyzed the exploration of innovative biopreservation strategies that pivot towards the utilization of natural antimicrobial agents as opposed to synthetic preservatives4. The use of essential oils represents a proposed approach in food preservation that has been documented to effectively mitigate AMR1.

AMR bacterial infections are the cause of approximately 700,000 deaths worldwide, with projections indicating that this number will surge to 10 million by the year 20505,6. For decades, the use of antibiotics has greatly reduced the mortality caused by various infectious diseases. However, their misuse or overuse has led to the emergence of antibiotic-resistant bacteria7. According to the WHO, Salmonella spp., Enterobacteriaceae, and Staphylococcus aureus are listed on the priority pathogen list for future research and development of new antibiotics8. This investment, with a specific emphasis on addressing gram-negative bacteria, represents an opportunity to combat AMR for an extended period, potentially spanning several decades1,9.

Studies had demonstrated the antimicrobial activity of numerous plant essential oils, including citrus limon10, lavender11, chicory12, and Mentha pulegium L.13. A plant with multifaceted effects is the date palm tree (Phoenix dactylifera L.), a member of the Arecaceae family encompassing over 1500 species across approximately 200 genera. Within this vast botanical family, the Phoenix palms represent a significant cluster, comprising 12 distinct species14. This plant has shown several biological activities including antioxidant, antimicrobial, anti-inflammatory, anti-hyperglycemic, anti-lipidemic, and anti-cancer activities15. Moreover, according to the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) in 2020, the worldwide production of date palm accounts for 8,526,218 metric tons (MT), with Asia and Africa being the leading regions (55.8% and 43.4%, respectively)16 with a substantial annual generation of date seed waste, which accounts for approximately 825,000 tons16,17. The seeds make up—10–15% of the date fruit weight depending on the cultivar18, and chemical composition differ due to differences in the type of cultivar, growing conditions, geographical region, stage of maturity, and the different analytical methods used for extraction and detection19. Despite the variation in chemical composition, date seeds have been shown to contain significantly high amounts of fiber, phenols and flavonoids, and relatively high antioxidant activities20. Date seeds have also been recently investigated for their valuable fat component, date seed oil21. The oil is considered to be oleic-lauric22 and has been shown to contain a remarkably high tocol content with dominancy to α-tocotrienol, followed by γ-tocopherol, γ-tocotrienol, δ-tocopherol, and β-tocopherol23. To the best of our knowledge, studies investigating the antimicrobial effects of date seed oil extracts are limited. The Medjoul date variety is the major cultivar grown in Jordan24. Accordingly, this study aimed to test the antimicrobial activity of Medjoul date seed oil against a number of selected pathogenic gram-negative and gram-positive bacteria in microbiological media at different storage temperatures (37 °C and 10 °C), and in the ultra-high temperature (UHT) milk as a food matrix at two different storage temperatures (10 °C and 4 °C).

Results

GC–MS analysis of date seed oil

To investigate whether temperature and time affect the antimicrobial activity of date seed oil, two sets of temperatures/times were chosen in this study. One set involved drying the date seeds at 50 °C for 5 h prior to oil extraction, and the other involved drying at 70 °C for 3 h. For simplification, the date seed oils (DSO) will be referred to as DSO (50 °C/5 h) and DSO (70 °C/3 h) respectively.

The antimicrobial effect of oils may result from a cascade of reactions rather than a unique mechanism and it is dependent on the chemical composition of the oil25. The GC–MS analysis for the two Medjoul DSO (50 °C/5 h and 70 °C/3 h) in the current study showed a total of 20 peaks for both oils including alkanes, fatty acids, aldehydes, fatty alcohols, and amides (Supplementary Figs. 1, 2). Supplementary Tables S1 and S2 list the retention times, compound names, and peak areas (%) of the detected compounds. The chemical constituents detected in DSO (50 °C/5 h) were 1.24% heptadecane, 1.29% 1-Nanodecene, 1.37% n-hexadecanoic acid, 2.39% tetradecane, 5.00% oleic acid, 6.60% pentadecane, 7.34% 9-Octadecenoic acid (Z)-, 8.54% heptane, and 55.43% octadecane. The chemical constituents detected in DSO (70 °C/3 h) were 1.35% 1-nanodecene, 1.66% glycidyl palmitate, 1.97% n-hexadecanoic acid, 2.13% tetradecane, 6.42% pentadecane, 10.95% 9-octadecenoic acid (Z)-, 13.36% oleic acid, and 52.22% octadecane.

Fatty acid composition of date seed oil

Seventeen fatty acids were detected in both date seed oils (Supplementary Table S3). For the date seed oil (50 °C/5 h), the most abundant fatty acid was oleic acid (42.26%), followed by lauric acid (19.79%), myristic acid (10.67%), linoleic acid (9.82%), palmitic acid (9.23%), and stearic acid (3.52%). The order of fatty acids and their abundance were also similar for the date seed oil (70 °C/3 h) with slight differences in the percentages of oleic acid (43.06%), lauric acid (20.31%), myristic acid (10.67%), linoleic acid (9.78%), palmitic acid (9.11%), and stearic acid (3.68%).

Antimicrobial activity of date seed oil

The antimicrobial activity of the two date seed oils against major foodborne pathogens was investigated at two different incubation temperatures, 37 °C for 24 h and 10 °C for 7 days (Table 1). At an incubation temperature of 37 °C for 24 h, DSO (50 °C/5 h) showed a significant bactericidal effect against the gram-negative bacteria E. coli O157:H7 (02:0627 and 02:0628), S. enteritidis, and S. typhimurium at a concentration of 15 µl/ml and reduced the counts by 6.7, 6.0, 4.3, and 6.0 logs, respectively. The numbers of gram-positive bacteria St. aureus ATCC 33591 and ATCC 43300 under the same incubation conditions were reduced by 2.0 and 5.0 log, respectively, at the same concentration. However, DSO (70°C/3h) showed a slightly higher inhibition against all strains compared to DSO (50°C/5h), where at a concentration of 15 µl/ml, the oil (treatment at 70 °C for 3 h) reduced the numbers of E. coli O157:H7 (02:0627), St. aureus (ATCC 33591), St. aureus (ATCC 43300), S. enteritidis, and S. typhimurium by 6.0, 3.5, 6.0, 4.5, and 7.0 logs respectively, and the numbers of E. coli O157: H7 (02:0628) were completely eliminated at concentrations of 10µl/ml and 15µl/ml. On the other hand, both oil treatments showed a lower inhibition concentration after incubation at 10 °C for 7 days compared to the previous incubation conditions. For instance, both treatments resulted in a reduction of E. coli O157:H7 (02:0627) count by 3.8–5.1 logs at different concentrations of 5–15 µl/ml. Similarly, the reduction of St. aureus ATCC 33591 by DSO (50°C/5h) and DSO (70 °C/3 h) reached 1.5 logs and 2 log, respectively, at a concentration of 5–10 µl/ml at 10 °C. While for St. aureus ATCC 43300, DSO (50 °C/5 h) and DSO (70 °C/3 h) resulted in 1.0 log and 1.4 log reductions at a concentration of 5 µl/ml and 2.5 µl/ml, respectively. However, in both St. aureus strains, higher concentrations led to a decrease in the log reduction. Contrary to previous data, the results indicated that both date seed oils had little to no antimicrobial effect against L. monocytogenes strains. Among the two L. monocytogenes strains, the highest log reduction was observed for DSO (50 °C/5 h) against L. monocytogenes ATCC 19115 at an incubation temperature of 37 °C, which was approximately 0.64 logs.

Table 1 Log numbers for the different foodborne pathogens after treatment with date seed oil and control.

Antimicrobial activity of date seed oil in UHT skim milk

Given that food matrices are composed of several different food ingredients, various molecular interactions can occur when an antimicrobial is added, which could affect its behavior in the food matrix when compared with microbiological media26,27. In this study, UHT-skim milk stored at 10 °C and 4 °C for 7 days was used as a food model system (in situ) to evaluate the efficiency of date seed oil at a concentration of 15 µl/ml. The results showed that the addition of date seed oil to UHT-skim milk did not inhibit the growth of the gram-positive bacteria St. aureus and L. monocytogenes at 10 °C and 4 °C (Figs. 1, 2). In contrast, date seed oil had a significant inhibitory effect against gram-negative bacteria including Salmonella and E. coli O157:H7 at 10 °C and a slight inhibition at 4 °C. For DSO (50 °C/5 h), log reductions of approximately 6.8 and 5.7 for Salmonella and E. coli O157:H7, respectively, were observed by the end of the storage period at an incubation temperature of 10 °C. However, at a storage temperature of 4 °C, DSO (50 °C/5 h) resulted in a lower log reduction of approximately 0.8 logs and 1.1 logs for Salmonella and E. coli O157:H7, respectively. However, a higher inhibitory effect was observed for DSO (70°C/3h) at a storage temperature of 10 °C, resulting in 7.2 logs and 7.0 logs reduction in Salmonella and E. coli O157: H7, respectively, after 7 days. Similarly, at a storage temperature of 4 °C, the DSO (70 °C/3 h) had a weaker inhibitory effect than the higher storage temperature (10 °C) and resulted in log reductions of approximately 0.8 logs and 2 logs for Salmonella and E. coli O157:H7, respectively (Figs. 3, 4).

Figure 1
figure 1

Log number of St. aureus on days 0, 1, 3, 5, and 7 with control and two treatments of date seed oil (50 °C/5h) and (70 °C/3 h) in UHT Skim milk. The concentration used for both oils was 15 µl/ml. (a) Incubation at 10 °C; (b) incubation at 4 °C; DSO date seed oil.

Figure 2
figure 2

Log number of L. monocytogenes on days 0, 1, 3, 5, and 7 with control and two treatments of date seed oil (50 °C/5h) and (70 °C/3 h) in UHT Skim milk. The concentration used for both oils was 15 µl/ml. (a) Incubation at 10 °C; (b) incubation at 4 °C. DSO date seed oil.

Figure 3
figure 3

Log number of Salmonella spp. on days 0, 1, 3, 5, and 7 with control and two treatments of date seed oil (50 °C/5 h) and (70 °C/3 h) in UHT Skim milk. The concentration used for both oils was 15 µl/ml. (a) Incubation at 10 °C; (b) incubation at 4 °C; DSO date seed oil.

Figure 4
figure 4

Log number of E. coli O157:H7 on days 0, 1, 3, 5, and 7 with control and two treatments of date seed oil (50 °C/5 h) and (70 °C/3 h) in UHT skim milk. The concentration used for both oils was 15 µl/ml. (a) Incubation at 10 °C; (b) incubation at 4 °C; DSO date seed oil.

Morphological changes in bacterial cells

Imaging of bacteria was performed using atomic force microscopy (AFM), which is a powerful tool that allows the study of microbial surfaces and changes in structure at nanometer scale28. The non-contact mode was applied in this study, with the cantilever maintaining a distance of tens to hundreds of angstroms (Å) away from the sample and only vibrating near it29, which protects the sample and the tip from damage and is considered one of the main advantages of using the non-contact mode instead of the contact mode30. The purpose of using AFM in our study was to examine morphological changes in the cells and to gain insight into the mechanism of action of DSO. As shown in Fig. 5, control images revealed bacterial surfaces that were smooth, where Staphylococcus cocci cells were arranged in clusters; a typical morphology characteristic of St. aureus, and gram-negative bacteria (i.e., E. coli and Salmonella spp.) maintained a characteristic rod-like shape. In contrast, when treated with DSO (10µl/ml), St. aureus cells showed a loss of cluster arrangement, and the bacteria had distorted shapes, surface blebs (protrusions), indentations, stiffness, and swelling (particularly in gram-negative cells). To analyze the morphological changes in more detail, AFM images were analyzed using the Gwyddion Software (Table 2). According to these results, St. aureus cells treated with DSO showed a decrease in length and width compared with the control. In contrast, E. coli and Salmonella spp. cells showed an increase in length and width. The average roughness and root mean square roughness were shown to decrease in all treated samples, except for Salmonella spp. treated with DSO (70°C/3 h).

Figure 5
figure 5

2D and 3D atomic force microscopy (AFM) images of (A) Staphylococcus aureus, (B) Salmonella spp., and (C) Escherichia coli control and date seed oil treated cells. Scan area 5 µm × 5 µm.

Table 2 Bacterial cell dimensions and cell roughness for the different foodborne pathogens after treatment with date seed oil and control.

Discussion

Traditionally, synthetic preservatives have played a crucial role in the food industry by effectively preventing microbial growth and lipid oxidation31. However, the use of these preservatives has raised significant concerns owing to their associated health risks, including allergies, hyperactivity, cancer, and neurological damage32. Moreover, these preservatives have been reported to be a potential stress factor that could contribute to AMR3,33. Consequently, there has been a notable shift in the demand for safer and more natural food products by both food manufacturers and consumers, driven by increasing awareness of the potential health hazards posed by synthetic preservatives and the demand for minimally processed foods, especially those containing natural preservatives2,34. The use of phytochemicals such as essential oils has demonstrated efficacy in various applications by reducing the growth and viability of microorganisms, making them suitable alternatives to antibiotics35. For instance, in a study carried out by Alizadeh Behbahani et al.12, chicory essential oil (CEO) was incorporated into Lepidium perfoliatum seed mucilage to develop an edible coating with rich antioxidant and antimicrobial properties Alizadeh Behbahani et al.12. The successful application of this edible coating was evident through the notable reduction in microbial growth, lipid oxidation, texture alteration, and weight loss in the tested beef slices compared to their oil-free counterparts. This outcome ultimately enhanced the shelf life of the food product through the use of natural compounds12. Likewise, essential oils like citrus limon and Mentha pulegium, when combined with different seed mucilages, have exhibited enhanced antimicrobial properties, and prolonged the shelf life of perishable meat products10,13. Thus, these findings demonstrate the effective utilization of natural phytochemicals as antimicrobial agents for the preservation of food products.

Previous studies have investigated the antimicrobial activity of aqueous, ethanolic, and methanolic extracts derived from date seeds. However, the antimicrobial potential of date seed oil has been relatively underexplored. A study investigating the antimicrobial effect of Nigerian date seed cultivars against strains of S. aureus, Majekodunmi et al.36 used two types of extracts (aqueous and ethanolic) and reported the same MIC values of 20 mg/ml and with 80 mg/ml MBC values for both extracts. Despite having the same values, Majekodunmi et al.36 observed that the ethanolic extract exhibited superior efficacy based on the inhibition zones previously determined. Specifically, the ethanolic extract demonstrated an inhibition zone of 12 mm at a concentration of 100 mg/ml, whereas the aqueous extract only achieved an inhibition zone of 8mm. This discrepancy was attributed to the active ingredients present in the date seeds which could have been more soluble in ethanol than in water. Similar findings were obtained by Chinelo et al.37, when investigating the effect of a methanolic seed extract against several E. coli and reported a MIC value ranging between 10 and 19.9 mg/ml. On the other hand, Shakiba et al.38 conducted a study using a methanolic extract to evaluate the antimicrobial effect of an Iranian cultivar against three St. aureus strains and one E.coli strain. According to the results, one E. coli strain along with two of the S. aureus strains exhibited identical MIC values of 1.25 mg/ml and an MBC values of 2.5 mg/ml. In contrast, the third strain displayed an MIC value of 2.5 mg/ml and an MBC value of 5 mg/ml. These findings underscore the potential of date seeds as promising agents, warranting further extensive research, with the prospect of addressing infections, including gram-positive bacteria38. These results were in agreement with those obtained by Barakat et al.39 who evaluated an ethanolic seed extract from an Egyptian cultivar, revealing an MIC value of 1.7 mg/ml and 1.2 mg/ml against a strain of E. coli O157:H7 and S. aureus respectively. Regarding other species such as L. monocytogenes, a study carried out by Smaoui et al.40 utilized an acetone-ethanol (50:50, v/v) seed extract from a Tunisian cultivar. The study reported MIC values ranging between 0.78 and 3.125 mg/ml and MBC values ranging between 1.56 and 12.48 mg/ml.

It is noteworthy that although several studies have explored alcohol and aqueous extracts of date seeds, to the best of our knowledge, there is notable absence of data regarding the MIC and MBC values of date seed extracts against other foodborne pathogens such as S. typhimurium and S. enteritidis. Furthermore, studies investigating the antimicrobial efficacy of date seed oil extracts are limited. The findings from current study showed that date seed oil exhibited lower MIC values against certain bacterial strains (10–15 µl/ml), underscoring its higher antimicrobial activity. Essential oils have been reported in previous studies to exhibit higher antimicrobials when compared to their ethanolic and aqueous extract counterparts41,42.

Compared to other studies that aimed to identify the phytoconstituents of date seed oil using GC–MS analysis, Qadir et al.43 analyzed the hexane fraction of Ajwa date seed oil, revealing 40 peaks. In parallel with our findings, GC–MS analysis of Ajwa date seed oil revealed the presence of several peaks, some of which were identified as hydrocarbons, including two instances of octadecane. However, a notable divergence from our findings was observed in the peak areas, which were significantly lower (0.30% and 1.05%)43. This disparity in results could be attributed to various factors including variety, geographic origin, climate, growing conditions, soil type, fertilizer used, cultural methods, storage conditions, different analytical methods used, different standards used, and the solvents used for extraction44,45.

The rich hydrocarbon content of date seed oil, their role as antimicrobial agents, and their mechanism of action are of specific interest in this study. The antioxidant activity of hydrocarbons has been reported in various studies on other oils. According to a study carried out by Yassa et al.46, the essential oil of the plant Rosa damascene, exhibited strong radical scavenging activity, surpassing vitamin E, and butylated hydroxytoluene (BHT). This potency was potentially ascribed to the oil’s rich content of hydrocarbons, including linalool, geraniol, nerol, 1-nanodecene, n-tricosane, n-pentacosane, and n-hexatriacontane, along with other compounds including octadecane. Moreover, variations in the compositions of alkanes present in oils have been used to explain their different inhibitory effects47. For instance, in a study assessing the antimicrobial effect of the oils derived from various parts of the Tunisian plant Allium nigrum L., including stems, leaves, bulbs, and flowers. It has been shown that these plant organs contain different alkane compositions. While palmitic acid was shown to be the major fatty acid in all organs, bulb oil had the highest percentage of octadecane (30.5%). Notably, bulb oil exhibited inhibitory effects against a range of gram-positive and gram-negative strains, including St. aureus, Enterococcus faecalis, and Proteus mirabilis, with MIC values of 250, 125, and 250 µl/ml respectively47. In a study conducted by Uma and Parvathavarthini48, the antibacterial potential of sea urchin extracts against various gram-positive and negative strains, including Staphylococcus aureus, Bacillus subtilis, E. faecalis, E. coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Klebsiella pneumoniae was investigated. The hexane extract of the marine plant exhibited a rich composition of alkanes including pentadecane, eicosane, heptadecane, docosane, and heneicosane, which were believed to be responsible for its potent antibacterial effect against all bacterial strains except Klebsiellapneumoniae48. Likewise, in the current study, date seed oil was shown to constitute various compounds including heptadecane, 1-Nanodecene, n-hexadecanoic acid, tetradecane, pentadecane, heptane, and majorly octadecane which could be used to explain its antimicrobial effect. However, as is the case with other oils, the mechanism of action is still not completely understood35. This complexity in determining the precise cause of the antimicrobial effect of oils can be attributed to the interaction of the different classes of active compounds49.

The fatty acid composition of date seed oils in our study were found to align with prior research, including an investigation carried out by Golshan Tafti and Panahi22. These studies reported that oleic acid and lauric acid constituted approximately 48.1–50.5% and 14–15.8% of these fatty acids, respectively. Additionally, palmitic acid (\({\mathrm{C}}_{16:0})\), myristic acid (\({\mathrm{C}}_{14:0})\), linoleic acid (\({\text{C}}_{18:2}\text{)}\) and stearic acid (\({\mathrm{C}}_{18:0})\) were present at percentages ranging from 10.8–11.8%, 10.6–10.9%, 7.7–8.2%, and 3–3.4%, respectively. These results are in agreement with other reported values, such as the work by Laghouiter et al.50 where oleic acid levels ranged from 37.83 to 55.0% across nine Algerian cultivars. Furthermore, lauric acid accounted for 6.63–25.36%, myristic acid for 9.30–19.33%, palmitic acid for 9.63–17.59%, linoleic acid for 5.71–10.44%, and stearic acid for 0.77–3.4%. Our results indicate that the oils extracted from the date seeds of Jordaninan Medjoul is also considered an oleic-lauric acid-rich oil51,52.

An extensive review of the existing literature indicates that there is a notable scarcity of studies investigating the antimicrobial effect of date seed oil. Only one study, thus far, has investigated this subject, specifically focusing on the lipophilic fraction of three Algerian date seed varieties. This single investigation employed the disc diffusion method to assess the antimicrobial efficacy against different bacteria, including E. coli, E. faecalis, P. aeruginosa, and methicillin-resistant St. aureus (MRSA). The results from this study showed that the treatment with Deglet Nour and Takerbucht cultivars had highest inhibition zones measuring 19.25 mm and 18.75 mm against E. faecalis and E. coli, respectively53. Our current study is the first to assess the antimicrobial potential of Medjoul date seed oil against different foodborne pathogens, using the broth dilution method. Our research demonstrated that while St. aureus was susceptible to inhibition by seed oil, demonstrating an overall reduction of 2.0–6.0 logs, the oil exhibited discrepancies depending on the St. aureus strain, with St. aureus (ATCC 43300) having a higher sensitivity comparatively and little to no inhibitory effect on L. monocytogenes strains. This observation could potentially be explained by the presence of a strain-dependent effect4. This lack of significant inhibitory effect of date seed oil against L. monocytogenes may also be due to the low range of date seed oil concentrations investigated in this study. Upon further investigation in the literature, we found that other oils such as olive oil had a significant inhibitory effect against L. monocytogenes with an MIC value of 1.25 mg/ml54. According to the study, olive oil resulted in adenosine 5′-triphosphate (ATP) depletion and further morphological changes including cell membrane damage as evidenced by the leakage of cell fluid54. Accordingly, further studies may be required to investigate whether higher date seed oil concentrations would be sufficient to cause significant antimicrobial activities against L. monocytogenes. Conversely, in the current study, date seed oil revealed a significant inhibitory effect against the gram-negative bacteria, E. coli, S. enteritidis, and S. typhimurium. This finding is interesting and unanticipated, as gram-positive bacteria are often reported to be more susceptible to bactericidal antimicrobials than gram-negative bacteria55. This can be justified by the fact that some antimicrobial agents have a narrow specific activity spectrum, and thus are not active against a particular species or category of microorganisms56,57.

In this study, we examined the effect of incubation temperature on the inhibitory potential of date seed oil against various foodborne pathogens. Evidently, date seed oil exhibited a more pronounced inhibitory effects on all foodborne pathogens when incubated at the optimum growth temperature of 37 °C, with the exception of L. monocytogenes. This could be attributed to the increased metabolic activity of bacterial cells at optimum growth temperatures58,59,60. At the lower incubation temperature of 10 °C, certain bacterial strains such as E. coli O157:H7 (02:0627), St. aureus ATCC 33591, and St. aureus ATCC 43300 demonstrated similar trends. These strains demonstrated the highest log reductions when exposed to lower concentrations of date seed oil (ranging between 2.5 to 10 µl/ml), potentially due to the saturation of efflux activity in the bacterial cells61. Moreover, our results indicated a temperature-dependent effect on the tested foodborne pathogens. Incubation at 10 °C showed a stronger inhibitory effect on the tested gram-negative bacteria than the lower incubation temperature of 4 °C. This observation corroborates the work of Gavriil et al.50, who reported similar temperature-dependent outcomes with nine hydro-distilled extracts of various plants including basil, thyme, oregano, rosemary, and other plants. At 37 °C, the plant extracts either reduced or inhibited the growth of three S. typhimurium strains, whereas at 4 °C, the plant extracts solely resulted in the reduction of the bacterial cells. This heightened activity can be attributed to the enhanced antibacterial activity with increasing temperatures58,59,60, which could be attributed to the increased active state of the bacterial cells that leads to higher growth and death rates at higher temperatures62. Conversely, lower temperatures, decrease the growth rate of the bacterial cells, rendering them less susceptible to the action of the antimicrobial agent63. Additionaly, lower temperatures can lower the efficiency of the oils due to the decreased diffusion rates and reduced fluidity of bacterial membranes64.

To gain insight into the mechanism of action underlying the observed antimicrobial effects, atomic force microscopy (AFM) analysis was conducted. In terms of the AFM images, St. aureus cells exhibited a decrease in length and width following treatment with the date seed oil compared to the control. This change may be attributed to the loss of cytoplasmic content and cell lysis. Conversely, E. coli and Salmonella spp. cells, showed an increase in length and width, potentially indicative of enhanced permeability of the membrane and cell swelling65. Furthermore, we observed a decrease in the average roughness and root mean square roughness in all treated samples, except for Salmonella spp. treated with DSO (70 °C/3 h). This reduction in cell roughness has been linked to decreased cell adhesion66. Additionally, the formation of blebs, which has been reported in previous studies, is suggested to be due to damage to the membrane components, which consequently leads to the destruction of the cell membrane and wall interaction67. Loss of St. aureus cluster formation and cell shape irregularity have also been documented in other studies involving essential oils67,68. Notably, our findings are consistent with those of previous studies. For instance, Fu et al.28 investigated the effect of rosemary oil on Propionibacterium acnes, and observed binding of the oil to the bacterial cell surface at lower concentrations, along with cell wall desquamation, cytoplasm discharge, and damage to the cell with increasing concentrations. This antimicrobial effect was attributed to the fat-soluble and low-molecular-weight components of the oil, including terpenes and terpenoids28. Similarly, Hafedh et al.69 also noted a higher susceptibility of gram-negative bacteria as opposed to the gram-positive bacteria when treated with Mentha longifolia L. spp essential oil. This susceptibility was linked to the high levels of monoterpenes in the oil, which were thought to be responsible for the disruptions in the outer membrane, such as holes on the cell wall surface, as well as affecting the cytoplasmic membrane or peptidoglycan layer and the release or disentanglement of the exopolysaccharides found in the outer membrane69.

Contrary to the common notion that gram-positive bacteria are more susceptible to antimicrobials due to the absence of an outer membrane (OM)70, our study indicated greater sensitivity of gram-negative bacteria to date seed oil. This phenomenon may be attributed to the presence of the hydrophilic channels known as porins. These channels are present in the OM and are responsible for regulating the passage of substances through the membrane which depends on the chemical nature of the antimicrobial agent71. These channels, typically excluding the passage of hydrophobic molecules; can be weakened by disintegration of the lipopolysaccharide (LPS) layer by molecules known as permeabilizers72,73,74. In contrast, gram-positive bacteria are characterized by a thicker layer of peptidoglycan, rendering the passage of antimicrobials difficult due to the rigidity of the cells, potentially explaining the higher susceptibility of gram-negative bacteria to essential oils75. Moreover, it is worth noting that organic solvents at high concentrations are also known to denature proteins by their solubilizing effect on nonpolar side residues by weakening hydrophobic interactions in proteins76.

Our GC–MS analysis revealed that date seed oil comprises a high percentage of saturated and unsaturated aliphatic hydrocarbons, ranging from approximately 66.33% in date seed oil (70 °C/3 h) and 77.75% in date seed oil (50 °C/5 h). The mechanism of action attributed to hydrocarbons is thought to involve their accumulation in the cell membrane, where they interact with the cell membrane or its constituents. This interaction results in the loss of membrane integrity and an increase in the permeability of the membrane to ions and protons77. Figure 6 shows a schematic of the mechanism of action of hydrocarbons on cell membranes. Octadecane, the predominant hydrocarbon constituent in date seed oil, comprising approximately half of the constituents, could explain the observed antimicrobial activity. Nonetheless, understanding the precise mechanism of action for oils is complex, and further research is needed to investigate the chiral properties of the present compounds78. Furthermore, fatty acid composition analysis of Medjoul date seed oil identified it as oleic-lauric in nature. Because of their aliphatic structure, fatty acids exhibit detergent properties that have been used to explain their detrimental effects on bacterial cells. This property enables them to interact with the cell membrane, forming temporary or permanent pores of varying sizes. At high concentrations, this interaction can result in the release of components from the lipid bilayer, including membrane proteins or larger sections79,80. Among saturated fatty acids, lauric acid (C12:0) is considered to have the most potent antimicrobial effect and is reported to exert its antimicrobial effect by means of tubule formation, leading to various defects in the lipid bilayer55,81. Oleic acid (C18:1) isolated from the leaves of Helichrysum pedunculatum, has also exhibited antimicrobial effects against gram-positive bacterial strains, including Micrococcus kristinae, Staphylococcus aureus, and Bacillus subtilis82. In another study, the essential oil of the Rosa damascene plant was found to exert a strong antimicrobial effect against the gram-negative bacterium K. pneumonia, possibly due to its major compounds including nonadecane, heneicosane, oleic acid, and citronellol (each constituting 24.72%, 19.325%, 17.63%, and 12.61% respectively)83. While the precise antimicrobial mechanism of fatty acids remains unclear55, the cell membrane is thought to be the first target of oils84. Several mechanisms have been proposed, including the ability of oils to degrade the cell wall85, damage the cell membrane and membrane proteins86, induce the leakage of cellular components as a result of increased permeability, reduce proton motive force, and deplete the ATP pool87.

Figure 6
figure 6

Schematic of the mechanism of action of hydrocarbons on bacterial cell membrane. Adapted from Heipieper and Martínez-Lavanchy65.

Conclusion

The chemical analysis of Phoenix dactylifera L. seed oil showed that the oil is predominantly an oleic–lauric oil with the dominance of hydrocarbons. Among the identified compounds, octadecane was identified as the major compound comprising 52.22–55.43%. DSO had a significant inhibitory effect, particularly against gram-negative bacteria, both in microbiological media and UHT skim milk. In the case of gram-positive bacteria, DSO showed a significant inhibitory effect against St. aureus in microbiological media, although its impact diminished in the food matrix. The effect of the oil against L. monocytogenes was considered weak using the investigated oil concentrations. It was demonstrated using AFM imaging that DSO is able to induce considerable alterations in the surface of the bacterial cells suggesting its potential role on the cell membrane. Abnormal cell protrusions and grooves, distortion of distinctive cell shapes and arrangements, as well as cell enlargement in E. coli and Salmonella spp., and shrinkage in St. aureus were evident from the images. Our results highlight the potential of Phoenix dactylifera L. seed oil as a potential natural preservative and antimicrobial to address the issue of AMR. The utilization of this by-product, which can be challenging to dispose of opens avenue for further applications in the future including its nanoencapsulation in active food packaging films to preserve various perishable food products.

Methods

Date (Phoenix dactylifera L.) seed collection and preparation

A permission was obtained from a local Mejdoul date farm located in North Shouneh, Jordan to collect the seeds from their farm. All methods were performed according to the guidelines and regulations at Jordan University of Science and Technology. The obtained seeds were washed thoroughly to remove any remaining flesh from the edible fruit, and they were divided into two treatment groups. The first group was dried at 50 °C for 5 h, whereas the second group of date seeds was dried at 70 °C for 3 h. After drying, the seeds were ground into coarse pieces using a pistol and mortar and then ground using a mechanical grinder (Mikro-Feinmühle-Culatti, Germany) into powder with a particle size of 1.5 mm.

Extraction of date seed oil

Oil extraction of date seeds of both treatments was done using hexane (BBC chemical for lab China) using Soxhlet extraction as reported by Laghouiter et al.50. Cellulose thimble (33–100-mm) was filled with date seed powder (25 g). The heating mantle was set to the boiling temperature of the solvent and the process was allowed to run for 6 h. The oils were then weighed after evaporating the solvent using a rotatory evaporator and stored at − 18 °C until further use.

GC–MS analysis of the phytoconstituents in date seed oil

The phytochemical profile of the oil was analyzed using the method described by Qadir et al.43. A gas chromatograph (GC) (SUIMDZU QP2010, Japan) connected with mass spectrometry (MS) with a fused-silica capillary column was used, dimension: 30 m, ID: 0.25 mm, film: 0.25 mm and flow rate of mobile phase carrier gas (Helium) was set at 1.0 ml/min. The oven temperature of the GC instrument was increased from 100 to 260 °C at 10 °C min−1, and the injection volume was 5 μl. Samples dissolved in n-hexane and methanol were run in the range of 10–850 m/z, and the results were compared using the Wiley spectral library search program. Mass spectra were detected at 30–35 min.

Fatty acid composition of date seed oil

The phytochemical profile of the oil was analyzed using the protocol followed by the International Olive Council88. Approximately 0.1 g of the oil was added to a 10 ml screw tube and 2 ml heptane was added. The tube was shaken using a vortex mixer, and then 0.2 ml of 2N methanolic potassium hydroxide solution was added and shaken vigorously for 30 s. The mixture was allowed to stratify until the upper layer solution became clear, and the upper layer containing methyl esters was decanted into 2 ml screw vials. The solution was injected into a gas–liquid chromatograph equipped with a flame ionization detector (Column: DB-23 (60 m × 0.25 mm × 0.15 µm)). The injector temperature was maintained at 230 °C, whereas that of the flame ionization detector was maintained at 240 °C. Helium (1.20 ml/min) was used as carrier gas.

Bacterial strains and culture preparation

The bacterial strains used in this study were E. coli O157:H7 (02:0627 and 02:0628) human isolates which were mutated and become nonpathogenic, were obtained from Dr. Rafiq Ahmed, National Microbiology Laboratory, Public Health Agency, Canadian Science Center for Human and Animal Health, Winnipeg, MB, Canada. S. enteritidis (CRIFS 1016) and S. typhimurium (02:8423) isolated from animal and human sources that have been used in a previous study89 were obtained from Dr. Amin Olaimat, Department of Clinical Nutrition and Dietetics, The Hashemite University, Jordan. L. monocytogenes (ATCC 7644 and ATCC 19115), and St. aureus (ATCC 43300 and ATCC 33591) were obtained from the bacterial collection in the microbiology research laboratory, Department of Nutrition and Food Technology, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Jordan. Each working culture was prepared by streaking the stock bacteria on tryptic soy agar (TSA; Oxoid Ltd., Basingstoke, UK), which was then incubated at 37°C for 24 h to obtain a single colony for subculturing on tryptic soy broth (TSB, Oxoid Ltd., Basingstoke, UK), except for L. monocytogenes, in which the TSB was supplemented with 0.6% yeast (Oxoid Ltd, Basingstoke, UK) at 37 °C for 24 h. The final bacterial cell concentration was adjusted to \({10}^{6}\) CFU/ml.

Antimicrobial activity assay

The antimicrobial activity of date seed oil was assessed using the microdilution method in a 96-well plate according to Wiegand et al.90. Briefly, date seed oils from the two treatments (50 °C for 5 h and 70 °C for 3 h) were dissolved in 0.5% dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) (Fisher Scientific, UK) to a concentration of 300 µl/ml. Subsequently, a 30 µl/ml solution of the oil in Mueller–Hinton broth (MHB) (Oxoid Ltd. Basingstoke, UK) was prepared as the original stock, and serial dilution was performed to prepare subsequent concentrations 20 µl/ml, 10 µl/ml, 5 µl/ml, 2.5 µl/ml and 1.25 µl/ml. Then, 100 µl of the prepared bacterial suspension for each strain was added to each dilution (100 µl) in a 96-well plate, subsequently, the final concentrations after the addition of the bacterial suspension were 15 µl/ml, 10 µl/ml, 5 µl/ml, 2.5 µl/ml, 1.25 µl/ml, and 0.625 µl/ml. The experiment was repeated three times with replicate determinations under different incubation conditions: 37 °C for 24 h and 10 °C for 7 days. After incubation, the suspension was mixed with a digital pipette and 100 µl of each concentration was plated on TSA and incubated for 24 h at 37 °C for E. coli, St. aureus, and Salmonella spp. and 48 h at 37 °C for L. monocytogenes to determine the bacterial log reduction.

Antimicrobial activity of date seed oil in skim ultra-high-temperature (UHT) milk as a food model

The oil concentration that showed the best response in the in vitro test (15 µl/ml) was selected to evaluate its effectiveness against the four foodborne pathogens in commercial skim UHT milk as a food model. All steps were performed under aseptic conditions. A cocktail consisting of two strains of each bacterial culture was inoculated in 10 ml of UHT milk to achieve a final density of 105 CFU/ml. After that, date seed oil was added to the milk to yield a final concentration of 15 µl/ml and the tubes were vortexed for 2 min to achieve good homogeneity. The samples were divided into two groups and stored at two cooling temperatures (4 and 10 °C). The bacterial survival count in log CFU/ml was performed in an appropriate selective medium, xylose lysine deoxycholate agar (XLD, Oxoid Ltd., Basingstoke, UK) for Salmonella spp., Baird Parker agar (Oxoid Ltd., Basingstoke, UK) for the St. aureus strains, Oxoid Ltd. (Oxoid Ltd., Basingstoke, UK) for the L. monocytogenes strains, and sorbitol MacConkey agar (MAC, Oxoid Ltd., Basingstoke, UK) for E. coli O157:H7, overlaid with TSA on days 0, 1, 3, 5, and 7. The plates were incubated for 24h at 37°C for E. coli, St. aureus, and Salmonella spp. and 48h at 37 °C for L. monocytogenes.

Atomic force microscopy (AFM) imaging

Preparation of mica sheets

To prepare the bacterial cells for imaging, mica sheets (Ted Pella Inc., Redding, CA, USA) were used as the mounting surface to immobilize the sample. The mica slides were prepared according to the protocol described by Allison et al.91. The mica slides were first cut to an appropriate size that fit into the microscope (approximately 10 × 22 mm). The outer layers of the slides were then cleaved off on both sides using tape. Then, the slides were coated with gelatin by dipping and withdrawing the slides quickly in the warm gelatin solution (0.5 g/100 ml distilled water; 60–70 °C). The slides were then left to dry overnight on a paper towel and supported on an edge under a biosafety cabinet to avoid any contamination.

Preparation and mounting of bacterial cells

Bacteria were mounted on gelatin-coated mica. For each of the control and treated bacteria, a cocktail consisting of two strains from each bacterial culture was prepared. For the oil-treated bacteria, 1 ml of each bacterial culture in MHB (OD: 0.08–0.13 at 600 nm) was mixed with 1 ml of the oil treatments at a concentration of 10 µl/ml. The tubes were then incubated at 37 °C for 24 h. After incubation, the tubes were centrifuged (4500 rpm for 10 min) and the pellet was washed with sterilized distilled water. The tubes were centrifuged again, the supernatant was discarded, and the pellet was mixed with 50 µl distilled water and vortexed. From this solution, 20 µl was mounted on a mica slide, left to dry, washed with distilled water, and left to dry. The slides were then prepared for imaging. For the control, bacteria were added to sterilized distilled water (OD: 0.5–1.0 600 nm), followed by the same process. All bacteria in this study were imaged, except for L. monocytogenes, as the oil showed no significant effect on bacterial cells. Imaging of the bacterial cells was performed using the AFM non-contact mode (QScan Sync SP mode, AIST-NT), n-type silicon tip (NSC15/Al BS, Mikromasch), nominal spring constant of 40 N/m, resonance frequency of 356 kHz, and scanning rate of 0.3–0.7 Hz. Images were analyzed using the Gwyddion Software.

Statistical analysis

Data were analyzed using two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) [IBM® SPSS® Statistics (version 25)]. Data are expressed as mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM). Tukey’s test was performed for pairwise comparisons to identify significant differences between the treatments (p < 0.05).