Xinjiang is located in the arid zone of northwest China, where water resources and irrigation for farmland are scarce1. Along with water scarcity, agricultural production is harmed by indiscriminately applying large amounts of fertilizers2, resulting in low fertilizer efficiency and serious environmental pollution3. Water and fertilizer are considered the most important factors affecting cotton yield and quality4, therefore, research on cotton fertilization and irrigation research have received widespread attention worldwide5,6.

Nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) are important nutrients for crop growths7,8. Although N fertilizer is the most demanded in crop production, the environmental pollution problem caused by excessive application of N fertilizer is also becoming more serious9. Research have shown that the current farmland N fertilizer utilization rate is only about 30%, due to various reasons such as excessive application of N fertilizer, unreasonable irrigation management methods, crop types and soil properties, as well as the volatile and easy leaching characteristics of N fertilizer, the loss rate of N fertilizer is high. The rest of the nitrate nitrogen (NO3-N) residue in the soil10, surface residue (0–40 cm) N can still be next crop reuse, but because the NO3-N is not easy to soil colloidal adsorption11, residual part in rainfall or diffuse irrigation conditions of deep leaching loss, NO3-N leaching in farmland soil is one of the important ways of N fertilizer loss and the main source of groundwater pollution, becoming an increasingly serious environmental pollution factor12,13. Unlike N, P is easily fixed and adsorbed in the soil, thus greatly reducing the efficiency of P use14,15. Therefore, reducing N leaching, increasing the displacement distance of P in soil, and exploring reasonable fertilization methods to promote the full use of N and P are urgent problems to be solved at present16.

Drip irrigation17 is a modern water-saving irrigation technology with controllable irrigation and fertilizer application in terms of time, sequence and quantity18,19. It can directly supply water and fertilizer to the soil near the crop roots at the right time and amount according to the crop's demand at different growth stages20,21,22, reduced losses such as leaching and volatilization of fertilizers, and significantly improving the efficiency of water and fertilizer utilization22,23. By applying water and fertilizer coupling, synchronization of the role of promoting fertilizer transformation, conducive to crop absorption and utilization24,25, fertilizer management is more efficient26. In the current cotton production in Xinjiang, the drip irrigation system in the field is usually about 1/3 time of water in one irrigation process, followed by N, P and potassium (K) fertilizer solution, and finally about 1/3 time of water in the drip to flush the pipe network, but the effect of this drip irrigation system is not ideal26.

To address this issue, this study utilizes perfect high-efficiency and water-saving drip irrigation technology in Xinjiang. Using the advantages of drip irrigation in terms of controllable fertilization and irrigation timing sequences, six different fertilization timing sequences management of NPK were established. Explore the impact of different fertilization timing sequences management on nutrient absorption and fertilizer utilization efficiency in the soil petiole system, and find the optimal NPK fertilization timing sequences management method.

Materials and methods

Materials

The experiment was conducted in 2020–2021 at the teaching trial site of Shihezi University, Shihezi City, Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region (44°18′N, 86°02′E). The cotton variety used in this study was Lumianyan 24, selected by Shandong Cotton Research Center, which is a medium-late maturing variety with a fertility period of about 130 days. Fertilization and weeding of plants in the present study complies with international, national and institutional guidelines.

Experimental design

The experiment was designed with six treatments (Table 1) with three replications randomized in completely zoned groups, planting pattern: 1 film, 3 rows and 3 strips, mulching, each plot 20 m long, row spacing 0.66 m. In all treatments (Table 1), S6 is the conventional drip irrigation (The drip irrigation is surface) fertilization timing sequences management and S7 is the treatment without N fertilization, where W denotes water drip, N denotes N drip, and PK denotes P and K drip. In which 1/3 time N–1/3 time PK–1/3 time W (S1), means the whole drip irrigation fertilization process, 1/3 of the total time of drip irrigation dripping N fertilizer solution first, followed by 1/3 of the total time of drip irrigation dripping P and K fertilizer solution, 1/3 of the total time of drip irrigation dripping water last, and the rest is the same. The application rates of N, P and K were 300 kg/ha, 109.8 kg/ha (P2O5) and 91.8 kg/ha (K2O), respectively. The types of fertilizers used as sources of N, P and K were urea, KH2PO4 and K2SO4, all of them are special fertilizer for drip irrigation with excellent water solubility. Eight (2020) and nine (2021) times during the cotton growth stages, with the ratio of 2:8 for N fertilizer and 3:7 for P and K fertilizer between bud stage (BS) and flowering and bolling stage (FABS), and the total amount of N, P and K fertilizer applied in a single application was the same for each plot (Table 2). The total amount of N, P and K fertilizer was the same for each plot.

Table 1 NPK fertilization timing sequences.
Table 2 Fertilization proportion.

Determination of NO3 N, NH4 +-N and AP content in soils

Soil samples were collected under the drip irrigation belt and between the planting rows at the full bud stage (FBS), full flowering stage (FFS), peak boll stage (PBS) and boll opening stage (BOS) of cotton, respectively, and soil NO3-N and ammonium nitrogen (NH4+-N) were measured at depths of 0–20 cm, 20–40 cm and 40–60 cm. Soil available phosphorus (AP) was measured at sampling depths of 0–5 cm, 5–15 cm, and 15–25 cm.

Determination of NO3-N and NH4+-N in soil: The samples were collected and stored immediately on ice. Before measurement, thaw the sample. Immediately after thawing, thoroughly mix the sample through a 2 mm sieve, weigh 5 g of soil sample, add 50 mL of 2 mol/L KCl solution, shake for 30 min, and filter. The extract is immediately frozen and stored. The extracts were thawed before measurement, and the NO3-N and NH4+-N contents of the soils were determined using a flow analyzer.

Determination of NO3 -N and PO4 3–-P content in petioles

Since a large number of petioles need to be removed to test the nutrient content of cotton petioles, the plot area was divided into two parts in the ratio of 3:2, where 3/5 plot area (SCA1) was used for plant sampling, and 2/5 plot area (SCA2) was used for petiole sampling.

Sampling is generally carried out on sunny days from 12:00 to 14:00. Cotton metabolism is in dynamic equilibrium during this period, and the stored NO3N, inorganic phosphorus (PO43–-P) content in the body best reflects the relative relationship between nutrient uptake and assimilation. The content of NO3N, PO43–-P in cotton petiole is relatively stable, which can reflect the authenticity of nutrient content in cotton petiole during the important reproductive period of cotton.

Ten petioles with leaves were collected at fixed points in each SCA2 plot, and their leaves were removed leaving only the petioles. The samples were washed with distilled water, and the petioles and leaves were separated. The petioles were cut and pressed. The contents of NO3-N in cotton petioles were determined using LAQUA Twin NO3- meter and K+ meter (HORIBA Inc., Japan), while the PO43–-P content was determined using RQflex20 Reflectoquant (Merck Inc., Germany).

Plant N content and yield determination

Three uniformly growing cotton plants were taken from each SCA1 plot and broken down into three parts: leaves, stems and reproductive organs from above the cotyledons. The dried cotton stems, leaves and reproductive organs were crushed and passed through 0.5 mm sieve. The N content of each organ was determined by the Kjeldahl method using sulfuric acid digestion.

The number of harvested plants and the number of spatted bolls in an area of 3 m × 2.28 m were counted in each plot selected for 3 m length during the harvesting period, after which 50 spatted bolls were harvested in each plot, weighed and the single boll weight was calculated. The seed cotton yield was obtained according to the yield calculation formula.

Data processing

Significance of elements under different NPK fertilization timing sequences management was evaluated by using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Duncan test. Significance was reported at P < 0.05 level. All data were analyzed with SPSS 27.0 statistical software (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) and the graphs were drawn by using Origin 2018 (Origin Lab Corporation, Northampton USA).

N recovery efficiency27 (NRE%) = (N uptake in N application area − N uptake in no N application area)/N application.

N fertilizer agronomic utilization efficiency28 (aNUE kg kg−1) = (Yield in N application area − Yield in no N application area)/N application.

Fertilizer Partial productivity28 (FPP kg kg−1) = Yield/Fertilizer input.

Results

Effect of different NPK fertilization timing management on N uptake in soil-petiole system

The effect of different NPK fertilization timing sequences management on the NO3-N content of different soil layers under cotton is shown in Table 4. With the change of the cotton growth period, the soil NO3-N content of each treatment decreased rapidly at the FBS, increased again at the FFS, was relatively low at the PBS, and increased slightly at the BOS. Soil NO3-N content was more depleted during the FBS and PBS, and the overall soil NO3-N content in 2021 was slightly higher than that in 2020.

Under different NPK timing sequences management, the S1 and S3 showed a trend of increasing soil NO3-N content with increasing the same soil depth. S4 showed the same trend as S1 and S3 at FBS (2021), FFS and PBS, while S2, S5 and S6 showed a higher concentration of soil NO3-N in the 0–20 cm layer. S5 accumulates more in the 20–40 cm soil layer during all important growth stages.

The significance of soil NO3-N content in different soil layers under different NPK fertilization timing sequences management was analyzed (Table 3). In the 20–40 cm soil layer, the overall performance of soil NO3-N content is S5 > S2 > S6 > S4 > S3 > S1 > S7. The soil NO3-N content of S5 is significantly higher than that of other treatments and significantly higher than that of other treatments. At the FFS, the soil NO3-N content of S5 is 9.4% (2021) higher than that of S6 and 23.7% (2021) higher than that of S7. In 40-60 cm soil layer, the overall content of soil NO3-N is S3 > S1 > S4 > S6 > S2 > S5 > S7. The content of soil NO3-N in S3 and S1 is significantly higher than that in other treatments. In individual growth stages, the content of soil NO3-N in S4 is also significantly higher than that in other treatments, except that it has no significant difference with S1 and S3. N application was significantly higher than no N application. The content of soil NO3-N in each treatment had strong significance in FBS (except 2020), FFS and PBS, and decreased significantly among treatments at BOS.

Table 3 Significance of NO3-N content in different soil layers under different fertilization timing sequences in 2020–2021.

The soil NH4+-N content showed a general trend of gradually decreasing with increasing soil depth under different NPK fertilization timing sequences management, but the soil NH4+-N content was significantly lower than the NO3-N content.

The trend of soil NH4+-N content in each treatment under different NPK fertilization timing sequences management is shown in Table 4. S1 showed a trend of decreasing and then increasing soil NH4+-N content with increasing soil depth at the FFS and PBS, where the soil NH4+-N content peaked at 40–60 cm soil layer at the PBS, showing a trend of gradually deepening soil NH4+-N content with deepening soil layer. The S4 also showed a decreasing trend followed by an increasing trend in the FBS (2021), PBS (2021) and BOS (2021) stages. The NH4+-N content of soil in S2 was higher than that of other treatments except for S5, which showed a trend of increasing and then decreasing with the increase of soil depth in S5 at FFS and PBS stage (2021), and reached the peak in 20–40 cm soil layer.

Table 4 Significance of NH4+-N content in different soil layers under different fertilization timing sequences in 2020–2021.

The significance of soil NH4+-N content in different soil layers under different NPK fertilization timing sequences management was analyzed (Table 4). In the 020 cm soil layer, the soil NH4+-N content of the S6 was significantly higher than the other treatments and not significantly different from the S2 and S5. In the 2040 cm soil layer, the soil NH4+-N content of S5 was significant with other treatments, and the S5 increased 6.4%-38.5% (2020) and 4.3%-33.0% (2021) compared with other treatments at the FFS, and 20.7% (2020) and 8.4% (2021) compared with S6 (CK), and S5 increased S2 had significantly higher soil NH4+-N content at FFS, PBS and BOS stages than the other treatments, except for the S5, which was lower than the S5. In the 4060 cm soil layer, the soil NH4+-N content of S3 and S1 was significantly higher than the other treatments, and S4 was also significantly higher than the other treatments in individual growth stages, except that it was not significant with S1 and S3. The soil NH4+-N content was significantly higher in the N application than in the non-N application. The soil NH4+-N content of each treatment was highly significant at the FBS, FFS and PBS, and the difference between treatments decreased when the BOS was reached.

The petiole NO3-N content of functional leaves of cotton showed a trend of gradual decrease with the advancement of the growth stages, reaching a maximum at the FBS and a minimum at the PBS (Fig. 1). 2020, under the management of different NPK fertilization timing sequences management, the petiole NO3-N content at the FBS was S4 > S2 > S5 > S6 > S1 > S3 > S7, among which the difference between the petiole NO3-N content of S2, S4, S5 and S6 was not significant. S2 and S4 were significantly higher than S1, S3 and S7, no difference between S1, S5 and S6, and significantly higher than S1, S3 and S7. The FFS showed S5 > S2 > S6 > S4 > S1 > S3 > S7, no significant difference between S2, S5 and S6 in petiole NO3-N content, but all were significantly higher than other treatments, no significant difference between S1 and S4, difference between S1 and S3 was not significant, and all treatments were significantly higher than S7. At the PBS it showed S5 > S2 > S6 > S4 > S1 > S3 > S7. The NO3-N content of petiole was significantly higher in S5 than in other treatments, the difference between S2, S4 and S6 was not significant, and the difference between S1 and S3 was not significant, but both were significantly higher than in S7.

Figure 1
figure 1

Changes of NO3-N content in petioles under different NPK fertilization timing sequences management in important growth stages in 2020–2021. Different letters indicated significant difference at 5% probability level in the same observation period.

Under different NPK fertilization timing sequences management in 2021, the petiole NO3-N content at the bloom stage showed S5 > S2 > S4 > S6 > S1 > S3 > S7, among which the difference in petiole NO3-N content among S2, S4 and S5 was not significant, and S5 was significantly higher than S1, S3, S6 and S7. The significant performance at the FFS and PBS stage was consistent with the trend in 2020.

Effect of different NPK fertilization timing management on P uptake in soil-petiole system

With the change of growth stage, the soil AP content was the highest at the FBS, decreased rapidly at the FFS, was the lowest at the PBS and increased at the BOS under different NPK fertilization timing sequences management. The soil AP content decreased gradually with the increase of soil depth from the FBS to the BOS. As with soil NO3-N and NH4+-N, the overall soil AP content was higher in 2021 than in 2020.

The trend of soil AP content of each treatment under different NPK fertilization timing sequences management is shown in Table 5. S1, S3, S4 and S6 have more soil AP content aggregated in 05 cm. S5 has the highest content in 515 cm and 1525 cm soil layer. The S5 had higher soil AP content at FFS (2020) and 1525 cm soil layer at PBS than at 515 cm soil layer, while the S7 had lower soil AP content than the other treatments.

Table 5 Significance of AP content in different soil layers under different fertilization timing sequences in 2020–2021.

The significance of soil AP content in different soil layers under different NPK fertilization timing sequences management was analyzed (Table 5). In the 05 cm soil layer, the S4 was significantly higher than the other treatments at the FFS, PBS and BOS. In the 515 cm soil layer, the soil AP content of S5 was significant and highest compared with other treatments, and the average soil AP content of S5 increased by 3.1% (2020) and 2.6% (2021) compared with S6 (CK). In the 1525 cm soil layer, the soil AP content of S5 was also significantly higher than the other treatments, and the soil AP content of S5 increased 11.6%23.2% (2020) and 7.6%15.5% (2021) compared with the other treatments at the FFS, and 20.7% (2020) and 8.4% (2021) compared with S6 (CK) at the bell bloom stage soil AP content increased by 4.7%20.9% (2020), 7.4%24.3% (2021) compared to other treatments and 8.0% (2020), 9.3% (2021) compared to S6 (CK).The average soil AP content increased by 8.2% (2020), 6.3% (2021) in S5 compared to S6 (CK). S5 significantly enhanced the mobility of soil phosphorus to deeper soil layers.

The trend of PO43–-P content of cotton petioles under different NPK fertilization timing sequences management is shown in Fig. 2, which shows a trend of increasing and then decreasing as the growth stage progresses, reaching a maximum at the FFS and a minimum at the FBS. In 2020, at FBS, petiole PO43–-P content was significantly higher in S5 than in other treatments, and S2 was also significantly higher than in other treatments. The difference between S4 and S6 was not significant, and the difference between S1 and S4 was not significant. S6 was significantly higher than S1, S3 and S7, and there was no significant difference between S1, S3 and S7. At FFS, petiole PO43–-P content was significantly higher in S5 than in other treatments, and S2 was significantly higher than in other treatments, except no significant difference between S1, S3 and S4, and all treatments were significantly higher than in S7. At PBS, petiole PO43–-P content was significantly higher in the S5 than in the other treatments, S2 was significantly higher than in the other treatments, except for no significant difference with the S6, all were significantly higher than in the other treatments, S1, S3 and S4 were not significantly different from each other, and all were significantly higher than in S7. All treatments were significantly higher than the S7.

Figure 2
figure 2

Changes of PO43–-P content in petioles under different NPK fertilization timing sequences management in important growth stages in 2020–2021. Different letters indicated significant difference at 5% probability level in the same observation period.

In 2021, at FBS, the trend of PO43–-P content of petiole was the same as in 2020, except that S1 and S3 had significantly higher PO43–-P content than S7. At FFS, S5 had significantly higher PO43–-P content of petiole than other treatments, except for no significant difference with S2. S6 were not significantly different from each other, and all treatments were significantly higher than S7. At the PBS, the PO43–-P content of petiole of S5 was significantly higher than other treatments except for no significant difference with S2. There was no significant difference between S2, S4 and S6, but S2 and S6 were significantly higher than S1, S3 and S7. The difference between S1 and S4 was not significant, and the difference between S1 and S3 was not significant. All treatments were significantly higher than S7.

Effect of different NPK fertilizer fertilization timing sequences management on fertilizer utilization efficiency

Different NPK fertilizer fertilization timing sequences management significantly affected fertilizer utilization efficiency (Table 6). 2020, N fertilizer recovery efficiency (NRE) under different NPK fertilizer fertilization timing sequences management showed S5 > S2 > S6 > S4 > S1 > S3, where NRE under S5 was significantly highest among the other treatments, the difference between S2, S4 and S6 was not significant, S2 and S6 were significantly higher than S1 and S3. The difference between S4 and S1 was not significant but significantly higher than S3, and the difference between S1 and S3 was not significant. N fertilizer agronomic utilization efficiency (aNUE) was significantly higher in S5 followed by S2 which was also significantly higher than other treatments. The difference between S4 and S6 was not significant and S6 was significantly higher than S1 and S3. In terms of fertilizer partial productivity (FPP) significance, S5 was significantly higher than the other treatments, and S2 was also significantly higher than the other treatments, except for no significant difference with S5. NRE was 58.5% and 24.0% higher and aNUE was 55.9 and 76.6% higher under S5 compared to S6 (CK).

Table 6 Fertilizer utilization efficiency as influenced by different NPK fertilization timing sequences management in 2020–2021.

Discussion

The distribution law of soil NO3-N and NH4+-N is affected by numerous factors. Different fertilization timing sequences of N, P, and K are critical in NO3-N and NH4+-N distribution, and the contents of soil NO3-N and NH4+-N directly affect absorption and utilization of plant nutrients29. Due to the characteristics of drip irrigation and fertilization with water, nutrients are also concentrated in the moist body formed by dripping water. According to research N fertilizer exhibits high solubility and good mobility in soil30. This study confirmed that when N fertilizer was applied in the early stage of drip irrigation process, soil NO3-N and NH4+-N contents significantly increased in 40–60 cm soil layer. Among them, S1 and S3 treatments demonstrated a trend of increasing soil NO3-N and NH4+-N content with increasing soil depth, increasing the risk of NO3-N and NH4+-N leaching31. When N fertilizer is applied in the middle and early stages of drip irrigation, the contents of soil NO3-N and NH4+-N contents significantly increase in 0–20 cm soil layer, and S2 and S6 concentrations in the upper soil are the most obvious, which is not conducive to better absorption of nutrients by cotton roots. When N fertilizer is applied in the middle and late stages of drip irrigation, soil NO3-N and NH4+-N contents significantly increase in 20–40 cm. Among them, soil NO3-N and NH4+-N contents in S5 are significantly higher than in other treatments, indicating that appropriate backward fertilization timing sequences of N fertilizer can adjust the distribution of soil NO3-N and NH4+-N and make it aggregate in the middle soil layer, which helps cotton roots better absorb and utilize N and improve N utilization efficiency. The indoor simulation results of Li et al32,33, indicated that medium-term fertilization treatment (1/4 Time W–1/2 Time N–1/4 Time W) improved N distribution uniformity in soil. Gardenas et al34, selected four micro-irrigation and fertilization systems in 4 different soil types to form 16 cases, and simulated the effect of system operation mode on NO3-N leaching. The simulation results reveal that fertilization in the later stage of irrigation process can reduce the leaching loss of NO3-N yielding, similar conclusions during this test.

P is mainly adsorbed by the soil, with poor mobility. When P comes in contact with the soil, adsorption, fixation, and chemical reaction fixation occur35, resulting in P is fixation as ineffective state P fertilizer for plant uptake and utilization36. As a result, P is subjected to stronger adsorption by the soil, affecting the amount and the rate of migration37. According to changes in AP content in different soil depths under various NPK timing sequences, it can be seen that during drip irrigation process, in the process of drip irrigation, with the postponement of the fertilization timing sequence of P fertilizer, the soil AP accumulates more at 0–5 cm, among which soil AP content under S4 was most concentrated in 0–5 cm soil layer, which was significantly higher than other treatments. Soil AP content was the lowest in 5–15 cm and 15–25 cm soil layers. This indicates that directly application P into the soil during drip irrigation does not promote downward migration of soil AP content. In contrast, in the drip irrigation process, the soil AP content was more concentrated in 5–15 cm and 15–25 cm soil layers when water was applied for a period of time before applying P, at the same time, the plant can absorb P better, and the PO43–-P content of petiole is also higher. In particular, soil AP content of S5 was significantly higher than other treatments. This implies that according to the law of P fertilizer transport in soil, irrigating water for a period of time before applying P during in the drip irrigation process improved P mobility in the soil38. This may be because the drip irrigation process with water first activates the organic matter and microorganisms in the soil, reducing P fixation by the soil and activating insoluble P compounds39, due to changing the timing sequences of drip irrigation fertilization, placing P fertilizer earlier in the soil is beneficial for the movement of P fertilizer towards a deeper layer based on the characteristics of the fertilizer following the water during the drip irrigation process.

Conclusion

In summary, this work confirms that the drip irrigation cotton NPK fertilization timing sequences management method of S5 (1/4Time W-1/4Time PK-1/4Time N-1/4Time W), which prevents N leaching from the cotton soil, increases P displacement distance, benefits plant nutrient absorption, significantly improves fertilizer utilization efficiency, and reduces environmental pollution.