Abstract
Macro-fungi play important roles in the soil elemental cycle in terrestrial ecosystems. Many researchers have focused on the interactions between mycorrhizal fungi and host plants, whilst comparatively few studies aim to characterise the relationships between macro-fungi and bacteria in situ. In this study, we detected endophytic bacteria within fruit bodies of ectomycorrhizal and saprophytic fungi (SAF) using high-throughput sequencing technology, as well as bacterial diversity in the corresponding hyphosphere soils below the fruit bodies. Bacteria such as Helicobacter, Escherichia-Shigella, and Bacillus were found to dominate within fruit bodies, indicating that they were crucial in the development of macro-fungi. The bacterial richness in the hyphosphere soils of ectomycorrhizal fungi (EcMF) was higher than that of SAF and significant difference in the composition of bacterial communities was observed. There were more Verrucomicrobia and Bacteroides in the hyphosphere soils of EcMF, and comparatively more Actinobacteria and Chloroflexi in the hyphosphere of SAF. The results indicated that the two types of macro-fungi can enrich, and shape the bacteria compatible with their respective ecological functions. This study will be beneficial to the further understanding of interactions between macro-fungi and relevant bacteria.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Macro-fungi, also known as mushrooms, are a type of chlorophyll-free heterotrophic organism1. Ectomycorrhizal fungi (EcMF) and saprophytic fungi (SAF) represent two major fungal guilds in terrestrial ecosystems and both play crucial roles in material conversion and elemental cycles2,3,4. EcMF are able to establish mutualistic interactions with host plants and form ectomycorrhizae in the natural environment5. They provide mineral elements for host plants by weathering minerals or decomposing organic matter6,7, or/and take-up mineral nutrients directly from soils to obtain valuable photosynthetic carbon in return8,9. The photosynthetic carbon is transferred to extramatrical mycelia and becomes a nutrient supply for underground heterotrophic organisms10. SAF are mainly responsible for decomposing litter and complex organic carbon in soils for nutrients11,12. Therefore, there are noteworthy differences in the ecological functions of the two types of macro-fungi in the terrestrial ecosystem.
The evolution of fungi in terrestrial ecosystems has exerted a strong impact on bacterial niche development13. Bacteria had developed competitive strategies for plant-derived substrates in their long-term evolution, and the utilisation of fungal-derived substrates has also led to different ecological strategies ranging from mutualist, endosymbiotic, and mycophagous bacteria14. In boreal forests, extramatrical mycelia of EcMF are important parts of underground biomass15. Compared to the root tips of plants, EcMF have a complex hyphal network and larger surface area which may provide a sufficient niche for relevant varied bacteria. Bacteria in ectomycorrhizosphere are not only influenced by the local soil environment, but strongly selected by particular fungal symbionts, namely, specific EcMF harboured distinct bacteria and ascomycete communities16. Tornberg and Olsson17 proposed that wood-decomposing fungi could influence bacterial community structure by using phospholipid fatty acid profiles to characterise bacterial communities. Furthermore, the bacteria may also be responsible for the changes in the structure of fungal communities demonstrated by the results from the study by Höppener-Ogawa18, who inoculated the genus Collimonas to soils and examined fungal diversity in soils and rhizosphere soils of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi by PCR-DGGE. Therefore, fungal hyphae, to some extent, may affect the bacterial compositions of the underlying soils and a stable community structure in hyphosphere soils by mutual selection and adaptation processes.
Endophytic bacteria in fruit bodies have attracted more attention to the study of the microbiome of bacteria associated with macro-fungi. Pent and Bahram19 investigated and sequenced the endophytic bacteria from the fruit bodies of Agaricomycetes and found that both the soils, and the fungal species, contributed to the bacterial communities in fruit bodies. They hypothesised that the bacteria in fungal fruit bodies may be selected based on their symbiotic functions or environmental requirements. Benucci and Bonito20 also drew a similar conclusion, namely that fungal species, and their regional distribution may contribute to bacterial diversity associated with fruit bodies of Pezizales. Therefore, the bacteria living in the fruit bodies of macro-fungi may play an important role in the development of the fruit bodies.
Based on the aforementioned analysis, we proposed that the hyphae of EcMF and SAF are capable of maintaining, or regulating, some special bacterial populations in their fruit bodies and hyphosphere soils. Therefore, an experiment was conducted to reveal the ecological relationship between macro-fungi and bacteria in situ, which is conducive to understanding of their ecological roles.
Results
Molecular identification of the collected macro-fungi
Six species of macro-fungi collected were morphologically identified according to the Dictionary of the Fungi21, the results showed that the EcMF belonged to Amanitaceae and Boletaceae and SAF belonged to Agaricaceae and Tricholomataceae, respectively. Then a molecular method was employed to corroborate the fungi based on the ITS sequence and the BLAST results of the fungi were as follows (Table 1): the EcMF collected were: Amanita pantherina (Fig. 1a), Suillus placidus (Fig. 1b), and Tylopilus felleus (Fig. 1c), which are mainly symbiotic with Pinus massoniana and Cyclobalanopsis glauca, and the SAF collected were: Agaricus flocculosipes (Fig. 1d), Chlorophyllum molybdites (Fig. 1e), and Termitomyces albuminosus (Fig. 1f).
Sequences of the ITS region of strains LS08, LS07, LS090, LS095, LS091, and LS092 were deposited in Genbank with accession numbers KR456156, KT381612, MG270070, MG270071, MG270072, and MG270073, respectively.
The endophytic bacteria within the fruit bodies of EcMF were regarded as bEMF, and the endophytic bacteria within the fruit bodies of A. pantherina, S. placidus and T. felleus were labelled as AP, SP, and TF, respectively; the endophytic bacteria within the fruit bodies of SAF were regarded as bSAF, and the endophytic bacteria within the fruit bodies of A. flocculosipes, C. molybdites, and T. albuminosus were labelled as AF, CM, and TA, respectively.
The bacteria of hyphosphere soils below the fruit bodies of EcMF were seen as EMFs, and the bacteria of hyphosphere soils below the fruit bodies of A. pantherina, S. placidus and T. felleus were labelled as APs, SPs, and TFs, respectively; the bacteria of hyphosphere soils below the fruit bodies of SAF were regarded as SAFs, and the bacteria of hyphosphere soils below the fruit bodies of A. flocculosipes, C. molybdites, and T. albuminosus were labelled as AFs, CMs, and TAs, respectively.
Data analysis and bacterial diversity
After merging and quality control, each experimental sample received more than 26,000 valid reads. The sample rarefaction curves of the operational taxonomic units (OTUs) (Fig. 2) showed that the sequencing depth covered nearly all bacterial communities in each of the samples and can be used for downstream analyses of bacterial diversity.
All samples were normalised to 26,000 reads for downstream analyses in QIIME. As for the alpha diversity of the bacterial communities, the richness of endophytic bacteria of EcMF (bEMF) was shown to be significantly lower than EMFs (t = −14.97, p = 0.00) from observed OTUs (Fig. 3a). A similar result was obtained in predicted OTUs by Chao1 (t = −18.96, p = 0.00) (Fig. 3b). Similarly, the same conclusions were drawn for the endophytic bacteria of SAF (bSAF).
In addition, the bacterial richness in hyphosphere soils below the fruit bodies of EcMF was greater than that of SAF. Conversely, the richness of endophytic bacteria in EcMF was lower than that of SAF. It can be seen from the Shannon and Simpson indices that the distribution of bacteria in the two types of fungal fruit bodies was more uniform than that in the corresponding soils (Fig. 3c,d).
PCoA analysis was mainly integrated the relative abundance and richness of species to explain the difference of bacterial communities in different groups. The PC1-axis was able to divide most of the bacteria in the corresponding soils into two parts (Fig. 4); however, it was unable to separate endophytic bacteria of fruit bodies entirely from two ecological types of macro-fungi. The PC2-axis was able to differentiate the bacterial community between fruit bodies and the corresponding soils. Although the hyphosphere soils were collected from the same sampling site, there were differences in the composition of bacteria between hyphosphere soils of different ecological types of fungi. However, the endophytic bacterial communities of different macro-fungi were similar (R = 0.80, p = 0.00, number of permutations = 999).
The bacterial composition of each sample
According to the annotation of OTUs, we found that endophytic bacteria within the fruit bodies or the bacteria in corresponding hyphosphere soils were mainly concentrated in Proteobacteria, Acidobacteria, Actinobacteria, Verrucomicrobia, Chloroflexi, Bacteroidetes, and Nitrospirae, which accounted for 67.09% to 94.58% of all test samples. The dominant endophytic bacteria groups in both the fruit bodies of EcMF and SAF were significantly different from the dominant bacteria in the corresponding soils. Proteobacteria dominated in both types of fruit bodies (39.36–89.48%), whilst it was not dominant in the corresponding soils (15.99–36.03%). Although the dominant bacteria at the level of phylum in the EMFs and SAFs were similar, their relative abundances differed (Fig. 5).
The compositions of bacteria at the level of genus were analysed and showed some differences between different groups (Table 2). The top five genera in bEMF: were Enterobacter (18.18 ± 0.25%), g_Enterobacteriaceae (12.11 ± 0.21%), Burkholderia (5.47 ± 0.13%), g_Xanthomonadaceae(3.99 ± 0.07%), and Acinetobacter (3.87 ± 0.058%); the top five genera in bSAF were Helicobacter (12.13 ± 0.13%), Escherichia-Shigella (4.86 ± 0.03%), Bacteroides (4.03 ± 0.03%), Halomonas (3.26 ± 0.03%), and Bacillus (3.14 ± 0.03%). The top five genera in EMFs were g_Acidobacteria (8.21 ± 0.04%), g_Chthoniobacterales (5.06 ± 0.05%), g_Acidobacteria (4.90 ± 0.04%), g_Acidobacteriaceae (3.67 ± 0.04%), and g_ Acidobacteriales (2.77 ± 0.04%), and the top five genera in SAFs were g_Acidobacteria (10.34 ± 0.05%), g_RB41 (4.92 ± 0.04%), g_Chloroflexi (3.82 ± 0.02%), Thermoleophilia (3.00 ± 0.02%), and Acidothermus (2.50 ± 0.04%).
Intergroup comparison
The comparison between groups showed that more than half OTUs in the fruit bodies can be detected in soils, which indicated the bacteria in the fruit bodies may mainly originate from the corresponding hyphosphere soils (Fig. 6a,b).
The common OTUs shared by the two types of fruit bodies accounted for less than 40% of the total number of OTUs (Fig. 6c), but the total reads of common OTUs were more than 75% of the total number of effective sequences. This indicated that the common bacteria occupied high relative abundances in the whole endophytic bacteria community within the two types of fruit bodies and that the common bacteria may play an important role in the life history of the fruit bodies. Moreover, a considerable part of the bacteria was common in both hyphosphere soils (Fig. 6d).
Discussion
The bacteria inhabiting the macro-fungi are correlated with their hosts probably due to favourable growth environment and the selection of the fungi22. Rangel-Castro et al.23 analysed the growth media of Cantharellus cibarius by 13C-NMR and found exudation of trehalose and mannitol which may explain how millions of bacteria can reproduce inside long-lasting fruit bodies of chanterelles without damaging the hyphae thereof. The dominant bacteria may occupy the niche quickly and play a role in inhibiting the entry of other bacteria or pathogens, which has been confirmed in isolation experiments of endophytic bacteria in fruit bodies24.
The common endophytic bacteria of the two types of macro-fungi comprised the main bacteria groups, which was similar to the results found in a study by Dahm et al.25, who observed that the majority of bacteria derived from the fruiting bodies of EcMF were Gram-positive cocci. The similar physical environment and nutrients may account for the high abundance of common bacteria23. Furthermore, the high relative abundance of common bacteria may also be important for the growth of macro-fungi22. Tsukamoto et al.26 found that bacteria, such as Acinetobacter sp., Bacillus pumilus, and Sphingobacterium multivorum, isolated from wild Agaricales, are capable of detoxifying tolaasin produced by Pseudomonas tolaasiithe. Associated bacteria inhabit spores, the hyphal surface, and internal structures of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi can promote growth of hyphae24, and accelerate the sporulation of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi27. Similarily, bacteria associated with EcMF could play an important role in sporocarp formation28 and in promotion of mycorrhizal symbiosis29,30,31,32. Furthermore, some endophytic bacteria within plants exhibit a vertical transmission phenomenon in which endophytic bacteria are passed from parent to offspring through seeds conducive to the survival of the offspring33. In particular, fruit bodies of different fungal taxa create various specific conditions that filter certain bacteria from the surrounding bulk soil34,35. The endophytic bacteria within fruit bodies may be important to the growth of fruit bodies and the development of their spores.
Our results showed that the bacterial richness in EMFs was significantly higher than that in SAFs (t = 2.48, p = 0.03, Fig. 3a), which may be related to the fungus-derived carbon sources. Ectomycorrhizal symbiont can serve as a two-way channel to achieve transfer of the nutrition between plants and EcMF. EcMF provide a large number of mineral elements for plants and acquired valuable plant photosynthetic products in return36,37. The carbohydrates are an important carbon source of certain bacteria inhabiting the mycorrhizosphere38. So the hyphosphere soils of EcMF were able to support more types of bacteria.
We analysed the bacteria with significant differences of the hyphosphere soils between two ecological types of macro-fungi based on the phylum level of classification (Fig. 7). The results showed that the growth of different fungal hyphae had a directional selection effect on the surrounding bacteria and tended to shape the microbial community to serve their respective ecological functions. It is interesting to note that Actinobacteria were dominant in SAFs, which may be associated with their producing rich antibiotics and inhibiting growth of pathogenic bacteria39, which were beneficial to the growth of hyphae of SAF and contribute to the formation of their fruit bodies. In contrast, EcMF were capable of secreting antibacterial substances which inhibit pathogenic microorganism, such as Fusarium oxysporum40,41. Thus the relative abundance of Actinobacteria in EMFs was markedly lower than that in SAFs. The microbial communities of the hyphosphere soils of EcMF were more conducive to the establishment of cooperative relationships between mycorrhizal fungi and specific plants. The measured pH of the soil samples showed the hyphosphere soils of the EcMF were generally acidic (Table 3). The acidic environment was beneficial to the release of insoluble mineral elements (such as K and P) and improved the efficiency with which the plant could use these mineral elements42,43,44. EcMF were likely to enrich the bacteria which were capable of producing acidic matter and weathering minerals36,45, and Taylor et al.46 found that EcMF secrete organic acids and decrease the pH of the surrounding soil to increase the content of mineral elements in the mycorrhizosphere. This might be a possible explanation to why Acidobacteria (t = 1.88, p = 0.09) and Bacteroides (t = 2.22, p = 0.05) were present in greater number in EMFs than that in SAF in this experiment. The EcMF also provided nitrogen to the plants27 which was consistent with the presence of a considerable portion of the Nitrospirae and Planctomycetes. Nitrospirae bacteria converted ammonium nitrogen into nitrate28 which was more easily absorbed and utilised by plants. These bacteria were involved in the cycle of nitrogen in the rhizosphere region. There were also some bacterial species with a special biological function in the hyphosphere soils of EcMF, mycorrhiza helper bacteria, which play an irreplaceable role in the formation of mycorrhizae, included Bacillus sp.29, Pseudomonas sp.30, and Burkholderia sp.31. The results of this study also proved that the relative abundance of these bacteria in the hyphosphere soils of EcMF was higher than that in SAF.
Methods
The description of the sampling site and the collection of samples
Zijin Mountain is located in the east suburb of Nanjing city, Jiangsu Province, eastern China, and this location has a sub-tropical monsoon climate and has annual rainfall of 900–1000 mm. The vegetation types are mainly defoliation broadleaved forest with evergreen plants. Through a site investigation in situ, a suitable sampling site was found in the east of the foothills to Zijin Mountain (adjacent of the mountain itself), where the dominant trees are Quercus L. and Pinus Linn. Six species of macro-fungi were identified as potential research subjects. After morphological identification, the six species of fungi were divided into two ecological types of fungi, namely: EcMF, A. pantherina (LS08), S. placidus (LS07), and T. felleus (LS090); SAF, A. flocculosipes (LS095), C. molybdites (LS091), and T. albuminosus (LS092) referring to the source of the carbon, and the way in which they preliminary obtain carbon (Table 1). Three intact fruit bodies of each fungus were collected in July 2016, and a total of 18 fruit bodies were collected, placed on the ice and brought back to the laboratory.
Additionally, the hyphosphere soils below the corresponding fruit bodies (5 cm × 5 cm × 5 cm) were also collected and stored on ice in sterile Ziplock bags. Eighteen soil samples were collected in total. Each soil sample was blended and divided in two subsamples. One subsample was frozen at −80 °C for total bacterial DNA extraction and the others were air-dried and sieved (through a 1 mm square aperture sieve)) for the determination of specific soil properties. To measure the pH, 10 g dry soil samples were placed into a 100 mL Erlenmeyer flask and mixed with 25 mL water, shaken for 30 min, and then tested by pH meter SevenEasy (METTLER TOLEDO, Switzerland)47. Soil samples were treated with 1 mol/L hydrochloric acid and total organic carbon and total nitrogen was determined by vario EL III Element Analyzer48 (Elementar, Germany). Soil exchangeable cations and phosphorus were extracted using the ammonium bicarbonate-diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid (AB-DTPA) multi-extractant method49, and the concentration of exchangeable cations and phosphorus were determined by Inductively Coupled Plasma Atomic Emission Spectrometer (LEEMAN LABS INC., USA).
Identification of fungi
The modified pre-treatment of sporocarp was conducted with reference to Kumari et al.22. Briefly, the sporocarp surface was disinfected with 75% ethyl alcohol for 1 min, then as much of the inner tissues of the basidiocarps as possible were picked with a sterilised knife. The tissues linking pileus and stipe of EcMF were isolated from fruit bodies on solid Melin-Norkans medium (NaCl 0.025 g/L; (NH4)2HPO4 0.25 g/L; KH2PO4 0.5 g/L; FeCl3 5 mg/L; CaCl2 0.05 g/L; MgSO4∙7H2O 0.15 g/L; thiamine 0.1 g/L; glucose 10 g/L; casamino acids 1 g/L, malt 5 g/L, and agar 20 g/L in tap water50). Tissues linking pileus and stipe of SAF were isolated from fruit bodies on solid potato dextrose agar (potato 200 g/L; glucose 20 g/L; agar 20 g/L in tap water51). The purified fungal mycelia were selected to extract genomic DNA by Rapid Fungi Genomic DNA Isolation Kit (Sangon Biotech, China) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The universal primers ITS1: 5′-TCCGTAGGTGAACCTGCGG-3′ and ITS4: 5′-TCCTCCGCTTATTGATATGC-3′ were employed to identify fungal taxa52.
DNA extraction of endophytic bacteria and Illumina sequencing
Total bacterial DNA was extracted using a FastDNA® Spin Kit for soils (MP Biomedicals, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Extracted DNA was diluted to 1 ng/μL with sterile deionised water according to the concentration. Primers Bakt_341F (5′-CCTACGGGNGGCWGCAG-3′) and Bakt_805R (5′-GACTACHVGGGTATCTAATCC-3′)52 (N = any base, W = A/T, H = A/C/T, and V = A/C/G) were used to amplify the V3-V4 region of the 16 S rDNA. Barcodes were added to the forward and reverse primers to attribute sequences to each sample. The program for V3-V4 region amplification was set so as to impose the following conditions: a lid temperature of 105 °C; initial denaturation for 30 s at 98 °C; annealing and Taq operation cycle repeated 30 times at 98 °C for 15 s, 58 °C for 15 s, and 72 °C for 1 min; followed by the final lengthening process at 72 °C for 1 min. All PCR reactions were performed with Phusion® High-Fidelity PCR Master Mix. Agencourt AMPure XP 60 ml Kit (Beckman Coulter, USA) was used to purify PCR products. The purified PCR products were detected by Nanodrop (THERMO, USA) apparatus, to evaluate the quality of DNA. Then according to the concentration, target PCR products were mixed at an equimolar ratio and electrophoresed on 2% agarose gel and extracted using an AxyPrep™ DNA Gel Extraction Kit (AXYGEN SCIENTIFIC, USA). Sequencing libraries were quantifies using Library Quant Kit Illumina GA revised primer-SYBR Fast Universal kit according to the manufacturer’s recommendations. The library quality was assessed using the Qubit dsDNA HS Assay Kit (THERMO, USA) and Agilent Bioanalyzer 2100 system (AGILENT TECHNOLOGIES, USA). Finally, the library was sequenced on an Illumina Miseq platform by the Guhe Information Technology Co., Ltd, Hangzhou, China. The whole metagenomics dataset was submitted to Sequence Read Archive (SRA) of NCBI and the SRA accession is SRP128958.
Data processing and statistical analyses
Raw sequencing data generated by Illumina were separated by samples according to barcode sequences. Raw reads were merged into a complete sequence in FLASH as supposed from valid reads53. The primer of the merged reads was moved by cutadapt54. Then, the high-quality clean reads thus obtained were used for OTU clustering by simultaneously removing singleton reads by using Uparse. Representative reads with the highest abundance in each OTU were selected for annotating information with SILVA55 by using the UCLUST algorithm56 in QIIME at 97% similarity. Finally, to ensure fair comparison between samples, all samples were normalised to the minimum number of effective reads and the normalised data were used for downstream analyses. Rarefaction curves and α-diversity indices of Chao1, Shannon, and Simpson were produced in QIIME. For β-diversity, an OTU level-based dissimilarity weighted_unifrac metric was used to measure the pair-wise community similarity between samples, and principal component analysis was used to visualise the distance matrix of all 36 samples in QIIME. A T-test was performed in SPSS 20 (IBM, USA).
References
Pecoraro, L. et al. Macrofungi in Mediterranean maquis along seashore and altitudinal transects. Plant Biosystems 148, 367–376 (2014).
Root, R. B. The niche exploitation pattern of the Bluegray Gnatcatcher. Ecol. Monogr. 37, 317–350 (1967).
Fernandez, C. W. et al. Ectomycorrhizal fungal response to warming is linked to poor host performance at the boreal-temperate ecotone. Global Change Biol. 23, 1598–1609 (2017).
Dighton, J. Nutrient cycling in different terrestrial ecosystems in relation to fungi. Can. J. Bot. 73, 1349–1360 (1995).
Grove, S., Haubensak, K. A., Gehring, C. & Parker, I. M. Mycorrhizae, invasions, and the temporal dynamics of mutualism disruption. J. Ecol. 105, 1496–1508 (2017).
Rineau, F. et al. Carbon availability triggers the decomposition of plant litter and assimilation of nitrogen by an ectomycorrhizal fungus. ISEM J. 7, 2010–2022 (2013).
Lindahl, B. D. & Tunlid, A. Ectomycorrhizal fungi - potential organic matter decomposers, yet not saprotrophs. New Phytol. 205, 1443–1447 (2015).
Finlay, R. D. Ecological aspects of mycorrhizal symbiosis: with special emphasis on the functional diversity of interactions involving the extraradical mycelium. J. Exp. Bot. 59, 1115–1126 (2008).
Hobbie, E. A. & Hobbie, J. E. Natural abundance of 15N in nitrogen-limited forests and tundra can estimate nitrogen cycling through mycorrhizal fungi: A review. Ecosystems 11, 815–830 (2008).
Cairney, J. W. G., Ashford, A. E. & Allaway, W. G. Distribution of photosynthetically fixed carbon within root systems of Eucalyptus pilularis plants ectomycorrhizal with Pisolithus tinctorius. New Phytol. 112, 495–500 (1989).
Talbot, J. M. et al. Independent roles of ectomycorrhizal and saprotrophic communities in soil organic matter decomposition. Soil Biol. Biochem. 57, 282–291 (2013).
Fernandez, C. W. & Kennedy, P. G. Revisiting the ‘Gadgil effect’: do interguild fungal interactions control carbon cycling in forest soils? New Phytol. 209, 1382–1394 (2016).
Wd, B. et al. Living in a fungal world: impact of fungi on soil bacterial niche development. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 29, 795–811 (2005).
Izumi, H. & Finlay, R. D. Ectomycorrhizal roots select distinctive bacterial and ascomycete communities in Swedish subarctic forests. Environ. Microbiol. 13, 819–830 (2011).
Lindahl, B. D. & Finlay, R. D. Spatial separation of litter decomposition and mycorrhizal nitrogen uptake in a boreal forest. New phytol. 173, 611–620 (2007).
Leake, J. et al. Networks of power and influence: the role of mycorrhizal mycelium in controlling plant communities and agroecosystem functioning. Can. J. Bot. 82, 1016–1045 (2004).
Tornberg, K., Bååth, E. & Olsson, S. Fungal growth and effects of different wood decomposing fungi on the indigenous bacterial community of polluted and unpolluted soils. Biol. Fert. Soils 37, 190–197 (2003).
Höppener-Ogawa, S. et al. Impact of Collimonas bacteria on community composition of soil fungi. Environ. Microbiol. 11, 1444–1452 (2009).
Pent, M., Põldmaa, K. & Bahram, M. Bacterial communities in boreal forest mushrooms are shaped both by soil parameters and host identity. Front. Microbiol. 8, 836 (2017).
Benucci, G. M. & Bonito, G. M. The Truffle microbiome: species and geography effects on bacteria associated with fruiting bodies of hypogeous Pezizales. Microb. Ecol. 72, 4–8 (2016).
Paul, M. K., Paul, F. C., David, W. M. & Joost, A. S. Ainsworth & Bisby’s Dictionary of the Fungi 10th ed. (CAB International, 2008).
Kumari, D., Reddy, M. S. & Upadhyay, R. C. Diversity of cultivable bacteria associated with fruiting bodies of wild Himalayan Cantharellus spp. Ann. Microbiol. 63, 845–853 (2013).
Rangel-Castro, J. I., Danell, E. & Pfeffer, P. E. A 13C-NMR study of exudation and storage of carbohydrates and amino acids in the ectomycorrhizal edible mushroom Cantharellus cibarius. Mycologia 94, 190–199 (2017).
Hildebrandt, U., Janetta, K. & Bothe, H. Towards growth of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi independent of a plant host. Appl. Environ. Microb. 68, 1919–1924 (2002).
Dahm, H. et al. Diversity of culturable bacteria associated with fruiting bodies of ectomycorrhizal fungi. Phytopathol. Pol. 38, 51–62 (2005).
Tsukamoto, T., Murata, H. & Shirata, A. Identification of non-pseudomonad bacteria from fruit bodies of wild agaricales fungi that detoxify tolaasin produced by Pseudomonas tolaasii. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 66, 2201–220 (2002).
Hildebrandt, U. et al. The bacterium Paenibacillus validus stimulates growth of the arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus Glomus intraradices up to the formation of fertile spores. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 254, 258–267 (2006).
Sbrana, C. et al. Adhesion to hyphal matrix and antifungal activity of Pseudomonas strains isolated from Tuber borchii ascocarps. Can. J. Microbiol. 46, 259–268 (2000).
Garbaye, J. Helper bacteria: a new dimension to the mycorrhizal symbiosis. New Phytol. 128, 197–210 (1994).
Frey-Klett, P. et al. Ectomycorrhizal symbiosis affects functional diversity of rhizosphere fluorescent pseudomonads. New phytol. 165, 317–328 (2005).
Poole, E. J. et al. Bacteria associated with Pinus sylvestris-Lactarius rufus ectomycorrhizas and their effects on mycorrhiza formation in vitro. New Phytol. 151, 743–751 (2010).
Bending, G. D. et al. Characterisation of bacteria from Pinus sylvestris-Suillus luteus mycorrhizas and their effects on root-fungus interactions and plant growth. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 39, 219–227 (2002).
Truyens, S. et al. Bacterial seed endophytes: genera, vertical transmission and interaction with plants. Environ. Microbiol. Rep. 7, 40–50 (2015).
Antony-Babu, S. et al. Black truffle-associated bacterial communities during the development and maturation of Tuber melanosporumascocarps and putative functional roles. Environ. Microbiol. 16, 2831–2847 (2014).
Barbieri, E. et al. New evidence for nitrogen fixation within the Italian white truffle Tuber magnatum. Fungal Biol. 114, 936–942 (2010).
Colin, Y. et al. Mineral types and tree species determine the functional and taxonomic structures of forest soil bacterial communities. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 83, 1–23 (2017).
Read, D. J. & Perez-Moreno, J. Mycorrhizas and nutrient cycling in ecosystems - a journey towards relevance? New Phytol. 157, 475–492 (2003).
van Schöll, L., Hoffland, E. & van Breemen, N. Organic anion exudation by ectomycorrhizal fungi and Pinus sylvestris in response to nutrient deficiencies. New Phytol. 170, 153–163 (2006).
Verma, V. C. et al. Endophytic Actinomycetes from Azadirachta indica A. Juss.: Isolation, diversity, and anti-microbial activity. Microb. Ecol. 57, 749–756 (2009).
Sylvia, D. M. & Sinclair, W. A. Phenolic compounds and resistance to fungal pathogens induced in primary roots of Douglas fir seedlings by the ectomycorrhizal fungus Laccaria laccata. Phytopathology 73, 390–397 (1983).
Chakravarty, P. & Hwang, S. F. Effect of an ectomycorrhizal fungus, Laccaria laccata, on Fusarium damping-off in Pinus banksiana seedlings. Forest Pathol. 21, 97–106 (2010).
Becquer, A. et al. From soil to plant, the journey of P through trophic relationships and ectomycorrhizal association. Front. Plant Sci. 5, 1–7 (2014).
Wang, J. et al. Molecular cloning and functional analysis of a H+-dependent phosphate transporter gene from the ectomycorrhizal fungus Boletus edulis in southwest China. Fungal Biol. 118, 453–461 (2014).
Hobbie, J. E. & Hobbie, E. A. 15N in symbiotic fungi and plants estimates nitrogen and carbon flux rates in Arctic tundra. Ecology 87, 816–822 (2006).
Uroz, S. et al. Effect of the mycorrhizosphere on the genotypic and metabolic diversity of the bacterial communities involved in mineral weathering in a forest soil. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 73, 3019–3027 (2007).
Taylor, L. L. et al. Biological weathering and the long-term carbon cycle: integrating mycorrhizal evolution and function into the current paradigm. Geobiology 7, 171–191 (2009).
Islam, K. R. & Weil, R. R. Land use effects on soil quality in a tropical forest ecosystem of Bangladesh. Agr. Ecosyst. Environ. 79, 9–16 (2000).
Huang, X. et al. Performance and bacterial community dynamics of vertical flow constructed wetlands during the treatment of antibiotics-enriched swine wastewater. Chem. Eng. J. 316, 727–735 (2017).
Soltanpour, P. N. Use of ammonium bicarbonate DTPA soil test to evaluate elemental availability and toxicity. Commun. Soil Sci. Plan. 16, 323–338 (1985).
Carocho, M. et al. Antioxidants in Pinus pinaster roots and mycorrhizal fungi during the early steps of symbiosis. Ind. Crop. Prod. 38, 99–106 (2012).
Liu, S. et al. Biocontrol of Sugarcane smut disease by interference of fungal sexual mating and hyphal growth using a bacterial isolate. Front. Microbiol. 8, 1–11 (2017).
Herlemann, D. P. et al. Transitions in bacterial communities along the 2000 km salinity gradient of the Baltic Sea. ISEM J. 5, 1571–1579 (2011).
Magoč, T. & Salzberg, S. L. FLASH: fast length adjustment of short reads to improve genome assemblies. Bioinformatics 27, 2957–2963 (2011).
Martin, D. P. et al. Recombination in eukaryotic single stranded DNA viruses. Viruses 3, 1699–1738 (2011).
Barbosa, L., Freire, J. & Silva, A. Organizing Hidden-Web Databases by clustering visible web documents. IEEE 29th International Conference on Data Engineering (ICDE) 51, 326–335 (2007).
Edgar, R. C. Search and clustering orders of magnitude faster than BLAST. Bioinformatics 26, 2460–2461 (2010).
Acknowledgements
This work was jointly supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 41772360; 41373078).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
B.L. designed the experiments; J.L., Q.S. and Y.L. carried out experiments and data analysis. B.L. and Y.L. wrote the paper, and all authors reviewed the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing Interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Liu, Y., Sun, Q., Li, J. et al. Bacterial diversity among the fruit bodies of ectomycorrhizal and saprophytic fungi and their corresponding hyphosphere soils. Sci Rep 8, 11672 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-30120-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-30120-6
This article is cited by
-
Soil microbial community response to ectomycorrhizal dominance in diverse neotropical montane forests
Mycorrhiza (2024)
-
Association of Bacterial Communities with Psychedelic Mushroom and Soil as Revealed in 16S rRNA Gene Sequencing
Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology (2023)
-
Bacterial communities associated with mushrooms in the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau are shaped by soil parameters
International Microbiology (2022)
-
Changes in Bacterial Diversity and Composition in Response to Co-inoculation of Arbuscular Mycorrhizae and Zinc-Solubilizing Bacteria in Turmeric Rhizosphere
Current Microbiology (2022)
-
Fruitbody chemistry underlies the structure of endofungal bacterial communities across fungal guilds and phylogenetic groups
The ISME Journal (2020)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.