Effect of human very low-density lipoproteins on cardiotrophin-like cytokine factor 1 (CLCF1) activity

Pasquin, Sarah; Chehboun, Salma; Dejda, Agnieszka; Meliani, Yasmine; Savin, Virginia; Warner, Gregory J.; Bosse, Roger; Tormo, Aurélie; Mayer, Gaétan; Sharma, Mukut; Sapieha, Przemyslaw; Martel, Catherine; Gauchat, Jean-François

doi:10.1038/s41598-018-22400-y

Download PDF

Article
Open access
Published: 05 March 2018

Effect of human very low-density lipoproteins on cardiotrophin-like cytokine factor 1 (CLCF1) activity

Sarah Pasquin¹^na1,
Salma Chehboun¹^na1,
Agnieszka Dejda²,
Yasmine Meliani¹,
Virginia Savin³,
Gregory J. Warner⁴,
Roger Bosse⁴,
Aurélie Tormo¹,
Gaétan Mayer⁵,
Mukut Sharma³,
Przemyslaw Sapieha²,
Catherine Martel⁶ &
…
Jean-François Gauchat¹

Scientific Reports volume 8, Article number: 3990 (2018) Cite this article

2556 Accesses
10 Citations
Metrics details

Subjects

Abstract

The cytokines CLCF1 and CNTF are ligands for the CNTF receptor and the apolipoprotein E (ApoE) receptor sortilin. Both share structural similarities with the N-terminal domain of ApoE, known to bind CNTF. We therefore evaluated whether ApoE or ApoE-containing lipoproteins interact with CLCF1 and regulate its activity. We observed that CLCF1 forms complexes with the three major isoforms of ApoE in co-immunoprecipitation and proximity assays. FPLC analysis of mouse and human sera mixed with CLCF1 revealed that CLCF1 co-purifies with plasma lipoproteins. Studies with sera from ApoE^−/− mice indicate that ApoE is not required for CLCF1-lipoprotein interactions. VLDL- and LDL-CLCF1 binding was confirmed using proximity and ligand blots assays. CLCF1-induced STAT3 phosphorylation was significantly reduced when the cytokine was complexed with VLDL. Physiological relevance of our findings was asserted in a mouse model of oxygen-induced retinopathy, where the beneficial anti-angiogenic properties of CLCF1 were abrogated when co-administrated with VLDL, indicating, that CLCF1 binds purified lipoproteins or lipoproteins in physiological fluids such as serum and behave as a “lipocytokine”. Albeit it is clear that lipoproteins modulate CLCF1 activity, it remains to be determined whether lipoprotein binding directly contributes to its neurotrophic function and its roles in metabolic regulation.

Crystal structure of LRG1 and the functional significance of LRG1 glycan for LPHN2 activation

Article Open access 01 May 2023

Lipocalin 2 stimulates bone fibroblast growth factor 23 production in chronic kidney disease

Article Open access 02 August 2021

Cardiotrophin-1 Deficiency Abrogates Atherosclerosis Progression

Article Open access 01 April 2020

Introduction

Cardiotrophin-like cytokine (CLCF1) is an IL-6 family cytokine^1,2 efficiently secreted as a complex with the soluble cytokine receptor cytokine-like factor 1 (CRLF1)^3,4. CLCF1 activates the tripartite ciliary neurotrophic factor receptor (CNTFR), comprised of CNTFRα, gp130 and LIFRβ⁵. CLCF1 and CNTF share signaling pathways^5,6 suggesting that the extensive pre-clinical and clinical investigations conducted on CNTF might also be indicative of the therapeutic potential of CLCF1. CNTF demonstrated potent neurotrophic activities in vitro and in animal models of neurodegenerative diseases, leading to clinical trials in patients suffering from Huntington’s disease, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and promising effects in retinal degeneration pathologies^7,8,9,10,11. Systemic administration of CNTF resulted in unexpected substantial weight loss⁸. This observation triggered pre-clinical investigations of CNTF in models of metabolic syndrome. Daily CNTF injections led to long term anorexic effects in diet-induced obese and leptin-deficient mice^12,13. CNTF decreased hyperglycemia and hyperinsulinemia suggesting that it could overcome leptin resistance in obese individuals and benefit type II diabetics^12,13. The effects of CNTF are believed to be both central and systemic, as CNTFR is expressed in the region of the brain controlling energy balance, in adipose tissues and in skeletal muscle^12,14,15,16.

Thanks to these promising preclinical results, a CNTF derivative was tested in clinical trials in which significant weight loss was observed^17,18, indicating that activation of the CNTFR can regulate food intake and metabolism.

The existence of a second CNTFR ligand had been predicted from, i) dramatic differences between the phenotypes of CNTFR and CNTF deficient mice¹⁹; ii) observations that CNTF is a cytoplasmic cytokine devoid of signal peptide^20,21; iii) identification of a CNTF-inactivating mutation homozygous in 2–3% of the study population, without observable neuropathology²². The role of CLCF1 as a key CNTFR ligand during development is corroborated by similarities in the phenotypes of CLCF1, CRLF1 and CNTFR deficient mice^19,23,24,25 and the overlap between the syndromes associated with mutations in CLCF1, CRLF1 and LIFRβ genes^4,26,27,28. Mutations in CRLF1 and CLCF1 genes result in Crisponi (MIM 601378) and cold-induced sweating (CISS; MIM 272430 and 610313) syndromes, two rare overlapping recessive conditions^4,26,27,29. Infants with these conditions manifest marked disinterest in food^4,26,27,29 suggesting CLCF1, alike CNTF can regulate food intake. Crisponi syndrome patients tend to suffer from high grade fever episodes and most die during the first year of life^4,26, supporting a role of CLCF1 in the regulation of metabolism.

Kidney cells express CNTFR³⁰. CLCF1 and CRLF1 are detectable in the developing kidney and can induce the development of mature nephron structure in vitro³¹. A urinary system anomaly has been reported in a CISS patient with a mutation in CRLF1³², supporting a role of CLCF1 in kidney development. Our results³³ suggest an involvement of CLCF1 in focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS), the most common primary glomerular cause of renal disease in children and adults³⁴. Numerous lines of evidence support the presence of a circulating factor in FSGS patient with recurrence³³. We identified CLCF1 in the serum of FSGS patients and observed that CLCF1 activates the STAT3 signaling in glomeruli and podocytes and induces albuminuria in mice and proteinuria in rats³³, indicating that this cytokine could represent such factor.

Normal serum comprises components that can inactivate the permeability inducing factor detected in FSGS sera. Fractionation studies of sera from healthy volunteers identified ApoE as an anti-permeabilty factor³⁵. This suggests CLCF1 could interact with ApoE. In support of this hypothesis, lipoprotein apheresis, a procedure that depletes ApoE complexed with lipids³⁶, is used as a therapeutic option for steroid-resistant FSGS^37,38 and CNTF was shown to interact with ApoE in vitro³⁹.

Interestingly, recent studies have demonstrated an association between ApoE variants and aberrant lipid metabolism in age-related macular degeneration^40,41,42,43. CNTF is a potent treatment in retinal degeneration pathologies, such as retinitis pigmentosa, underlying a possible interaction between CNTF and ApoE containing lipoproteins in the retina^11,44,45,46.

We observed that CLCF1, like CNTF³⁹, binds ApoE an important modulator of lipids transport and metabolism. CLCF1, when incubated with serum or purified lipoproteins, participates in lipoprotein-lipid complexes. Formation of complexes with lipoprotein particles changes the biological activity of CLCF1 on CNTFR transfectants and CNTFR expressing cell lines and tissues. This indicates that CLCF1 is likely a “lipocytokine” in serum or cerebrospinal fluid and, that lipoprotein may regulate the neurotrophic and metabolic functions of this cytokine as well as its pathological role in FSGS.

Results

CLCF1 forms complexes with ApoE2, 3 and 4

As an initial test to determine whether CLCF1 formed a complex with ApoE, we incubated biotinylated CLCF1 with ApoE and immunoprecipitated ApoE using an anti-CLC mAb. As reported for CNTF³⁹, co-immunoprecipitation of CLCF1 with the three most common ApoE isoforms, ApoE2, 3 and 4 could be observed (Fig. 1A). We next analyzed whether CLCF1 and ApoE form complexes when co-expressed in transfectants. Efficient secretion of CLCF1 by fibroblasts requires co-expression of the soluble cytokine receptor CRLF1^4,5. We therefore generated stable tranfectants expressing ApoE2, 3 or 4, co-expressing CLCF1 and CRLF1 or co-expressing CLCF1 and CRLF1 with either ApoE2, 3 or 4. As expected, ApoE2, 3 and 4 or CLCF1 could be detected in the culture medium of the cells transfected with the corresponding cDNA (Fig. 1B lower panels). Isolation of ApoE2, 3 and 4 from the transfectants culture medium by affinity chromatography using anti-ApoE mAb resulted in co-isolation of CLCF1 (Fig. 1B upper panels). This confirmed the ApoE-CLCF1 interaction (Fig. 1A) when ApoE2, 3 or 4 was co-incubated with CLCF1 and also indicated that the formation of ApoE-CLCF1 complex was not prevented by CRLF1.

To avoid potential competition between exogenous or secreted ApoE and fetal bovine serum ApoE, these experiments were performed using buffered solutions (Fig. 1A) or serum-free cell culture medium (Fig. 1B). Serum ApoE is involved in transport of bound lipids. The formation of complexes with lipids is believed to strongly affect ApoE structure including the four helix NH₂ domain that resembles type I cytokines^47,48. We therefore determined whether CLCF1 could also form complexes with serum ApoE. We mixed mouse CLCF1 with serum isolated from WT or ApoE^−/− mice and subjected the mixture to immunoaffinity chromatography using anti-mouse ApoE mAb. Co-immunoprecipitation of CLCF1 and ApoE could be detected (Fig. 1C). However, similar immunoaffinity chromatography using a mixture of CLCF1 and ApoE deficient mouse serum did not result in co-immunoprecipitation thus ruling out a non-specific isolation of CLCF1 (Fig. 1C). As it is unclear whether mouse ApoE should be considered as ApoE3 or ApoE4 subtype^49,50, we examined whether CLCF1 forms a complex with human serum ApoE3 (Fig. 1D). As observed with mouse serum, co-immunoprecipitation of human serum ApoE and CLCF1 was detected, indicating that formation of the CLCF1-ApoE complex could be detected in the presence of serum proteins and lipids (Fig. 1D).

Complexes between ApoE2, 3 and 4 and CLCF1 can be detected in solution using an AlphaLISA proximity assay

We next examined whether the formation of complexes could also be observed in solution using a proximity assay. In this assay biotinylated CLCF1 is used to recruit the streptavidin coated donor beads while the anti-rat IgG acceptor beads are recruited by the anti-ApoE mAb/ApoE, putative CLCF1 binding partner (Fig. 2). A strong energy transfer was detected between the donor and acceptor beads, indicating that interaction between CLCF1 and ApoE2, 3 and 4 could be detected in solution. (Fig. 2A). The observed signal was more that 10 × higher than the background energy transfer in the absence of CLCF1, ApoE or anti-ApoE mAb, indicating that it was induced by the formation of CLCF1-ApoE-anti-ApoE complexes (Fig. 2A).

CLCF1-ApoE complexes are not disrupted by lipids

Having shown that CLCF1-ApoE can be detected in solution using the AlphaLISA proximity assay (Fig. 2A), we used this approach to assess the effect of lipid-induced change in ApoE structure on the interaction between CLCF1 and ApoE. While our data on co-immunoprecipitaiton between serum ApoE and CLCF1 suggest that ApoE can interact with CLCF1 in the presence of lipids, the formation of complex between lipid-free ApoE and the cytokine could not be excluded. 1,2-dimyristoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine (DMPC) is extensively used as a model lipid that binds and induces ApoE conformation changes⁴⁷. We therefore investigated the effect of DMPC on CLCF1-ApoE3 interaction. Preincubation of ApoE with DMPC at concentration previously used to alter ApoE four α-helix NH₂ domain structure⁴⁷ markedly increased the proximity assay signal (Fig. 2B), indicating that lipid-bound ApoE, which is believed to represent the bulk of extracellular ApoE, can still form a complex with CLCF1. Interestingly, the interaction between the predominant ApoE isotype, ApoE3, and CLCF1 was more sensitive to the effect of DMPC than ApoE2-CLCF1 or ApoE4-CLCF1 according to the proximity assay signal (Fig. 2B).

ApoE increases the biological activity of CLCF1

Next, we determined whether ApoE could modify CNTFR recruitment and activation using Ba/F3 transfectants expressing the tripartite CNTFR⁵. Interestingly, while the binding of biotinylated CLCF1 was slightly decreased in the presence of ApoE3 (Fig. 3A), CLCF1-induced STAT3 phosphorylation was increased in the presence of ApoE3 (Fig. 3B).

CLCF1 co-purifies/co-elutes with ApoE-containing lipoprotein complexes

This observation prompted us to examine whether CLCF1 participated in ApoE-containing lipoprotein complexes. We therefore subjected CLCF1 mixed with mouse or human serum to Fast Performance Liquid Chromatography (FPLC). This approach is widely used to analyze lipoprotein complexes⁵¹. CLCF1 was detected in the ApoE containing fractions suggesting that the two proteins form complexes (Fig. 4A,B). No CLCF1 could be revealed in the fractions containing free proteins or small size protein complexes, indicating that CLCF1 is mainly bound to large size, presumably lipoprotein complexes. This is further supported by the data obtained when CLCF1 was mixed with sera from ApoE^−/− mice. The lipoprotein elution profile is modified in these mice i.e. the proportion of VLDL, IDL and LDL is markedly increased while that of HDL is decreased⁵². Although the CLCF1 elution profile was altered (Fig. 4C), CLCF1 remained in lipoprotein fractions. This suggests that CLCF1 can interact with lipoprotein complexes independent of ApoE and that it represents a “lipocytokine”.

CLCF1 binds VLDL and LDL

To test whether CLCF1 can bind lipoproteins we used a ligand blotting approach used to detect LDL receptors⁵³. CLCF1 was subjected to SDS-PAGE under non-reducing conditions, transferred to nitrocellulose and incubated with biotinylated LDL, HDL or VLDL (Fig. 5A). A clear signal was detected when CLCF1 monomers and multimers were incubated with VLDL and LDL while no signal could be observed with BSA, used as a specificity control or when CLCF1 was incubated only with the reagent used to detect biotinylated lipoproteins (Fig. 5A left panel). A very faint signal was observed with HDL.

To confirm CLCF1-lipoprotein interactions, we performed AlphaLISA proximity assays between biotinylated CLCF1 (to recruit streptavidin coated donor beads) and VLDL, LDL or HDL covalently conjugated to acceptor beads. Strong fluorescent signals where obtained when CLCF1 was mixed with LDL and VLDL (Fig. 5B). As observed with the ligand blot assays, no clear positive signals were detected when the proximity assay was performed using HDL-conjugated beads (Fig. 5B). To assess the specificity of the signal, we carried out competition experiments by adding increasing amount of unlabeled CLCF1 to protein-protein interactions assays. As expected, the presence of unlabeled CLCF1 decreased biotinylated CLCF1-LDL and CLCF1-VLDL proximity assay signal indicating that the latter was specific (Supplementary Figure S1). No competition was observed for the very low CLCF1-HDL signal suggesting that it was nonspecific. These results indicate that CLCF1 can efficiently participate to form complexes with LDL and VLDL lipoproteins.

Lipoproteins modify CLCF1 binding to CNTFR-expressing transfectants and cell lines

Next, we investigated whether the formation of CLCF1-lipoprotein complex influences the binding of CLCF1 to Ba/F3 transfectants expressing the tripartite CNTFR (CNTFRα, gp130 and LIFRβ). When Ba/F3 cells were incubated with biotinylated CLCF1 in the presence of HDL or LDL, the binding of the cytokine was not significantly modified (Fig. 6A). Inclusion of VLDL markedly enhanced CLCF1 binding to the CNTFR transfectants (Fig. 6A). To exclude possibility that the VLDL-effect is linked to a characteristic of the Ba/F3 pro-B cell line, we investigated the effect of the lipoproteins on the binding of CLCF1 to IMR-32 human neuroblastoma cells or the 3T3-L1 mouse pre-adipocytes both expressing CNTFR^5,14. As observed with the Ba/F3 CNTFR, the presence of VLDL strongly increases the binding to the CNTFR expressing cells (Fig. 6B and C). No CLCF1 binding could be detected on Ba/F3 expressing LIFRβ in the presence or absence of lipoproteins (data not shown).

CLCF1 activity is modified by HDL, LDL and VLDL

We next used CNTFR expressing Ba/F3 transfectants to evaluate whether binding to lipoprotein would modify the activity of CLCF1. We analyzed the activation of the CNTFR signaling pathways by phospho-specific flow cytometry⁵⁴. CLCF1 did not induce a significant change of STAT3 phosphorylation in Ba/F3 cells when HDL or LDL concentration in the medium was close to serum levels⁵⁵ (Fig. 7A). Inclusion of VLDL sharply reduced CLCF1-induced signaling (Fig. 7A). Time-course experiments indicated that the signaling reduction observed at 15 min in the presence of VLDL was not due to a delay in STAT3 activation (Fig. 7C).

In preclinical mouse models of retinopathy, activation of the JAK-STAT3 pathway by the CNTFR ligand CNTF was shown to be therapeutically beneficial in blocking pathological neovascularization and led to CNTF delivered by encapsulated cell intraocular implant as an established treatment for retinitis pigmentosa and macular telangiectasia^11,44,45,46. We therefore tested the capacity of VLDL to inhibit CLCF1-induced STAT3 phosphorylation in ARPE-19 retinal epithelial cell line cultures. As observed with Ba/F3 transfectants, inclusion of VLDL markedly attenuated the CLCF1-induced phosphorylation of STAT3 (Fig. 7B). Altogether, our results indicate that VLDL, while increasing CLCF1 binding to its receptor, decreased the capacity of the CLCF1 receptor complexes to activate the JAK-STAT3 signaling pathway. Our results indicate that lipoproteins bind and regulate CLCF1 activity, suggesting that variation of the ratio between the different lipoproteins in serum or other body fluids could control the neurotrophic, metabolic and immunoregulatory functions of CLCF1.

CLCF1 in oxygen induced retinopathy

In order the investigate the relevance of our findings in vivo, we interrogated on the ability of CLCF1 to inhibit angiogenesis in a mouse model of oxygen induced retinopathy that is widely used to study pathological neovascularization in the retina⁵⁶. Mouse pups are placed in 75% O₂ from postnatal day 7 to 12 to induce vascular degeneration and then returned to room air for 5 days. This model mimics retinopathy of prematurity and serves as a proxy for the angiogenic phase of proliferative diabetic retinopathy⁵⁷. Intraocular injection of CLCF1 or VLDL individually significantly augmented vascular regeneration (Fig. 8A and C) and reduced pathological pre-retinal neovascularization (Fig. 8B and D) as determined at postnatal day 17. These findings are similar to those recently reported by Bucher and colleagues for CNTF alone⁵⁸. Interestingly, injections of the CLCF1-VLDL complex did not result in additive beneficial effect compared with VLDL alone suggesting that VLDL prevents the effect of CLCF1 and, that the biological activity of CLCF1can be regulated by lipoproteins in vivo (Fig. 8).

Discussion

CLCF1 is a potent neurotrophic factor with the ability to activate the tripartite CNTFR. Symptoms associated with mutations in the genes coding for CLCF1 or its binding partner CRLF1 suggest that this cytokine could regulate metabolism and food intake. In this study we observed that CLCF1, alike CNTF, forms complexes with ApoE, an important regulator of lipids transport and lipid metabolism. These complexes could be detected when the two binding partners were mixed or co-expressed using mouse or human proteins. CLCF1 also formed complexes with the three most common ApoE isotypes (ApoE2, 3 and 4). The formation of ApoE complexes was not prevented by co-expression with the soluble cytokine receptor CRLF1 that is necessary for efficient secretion of CLCF1 and recently shown to participate in CNTFR activation^59,60. CLCF1-ApoE complexes could be observed using complementary approaches based on unrelated principles: co-immunoprecipitation, chromatography or proximity assays. The formation of ApoE-CLCF1 complexes was increased in presence of DMPC, a compound known to bind ApoE and previously used to investigate the lipid-induced changes of ApoE conformation⁴⁷. This together with the observation that CLCF1 interacts with ApoE in lipid-containing serum indicates that CLCF1 is likely to bind ApoE in circulation. CLCF1-ApoE complexes could also be present in the central nervous system where ApoE plays a key role in lipid transport and regulation of neural function. CLCF1 has neuroprotective role during development in mouse models²⁴. Interestingly, considering the high physiological concentration of ApoE in serum and cerebrospinal fluids, CLCF1 is expected to play its exocrine functions in an ApoE-complexed form. In support of this notion, no CLCF1 could be detected in the small protein fraction of mouse and human serum. While ApoE binds CLCF1, fractionation of ApoE-deficient mouse sera mixed with this cytokine indicates that ApoE is not required for the interaction of CLCF1 with lipoproteins. Further analysis revealed that CLCF1 binds with different plasma lipoproteins (LDL and VLDL). Thus, these results provide a strong rationale to consider CLCF1 as a “lipocytokine” and to pursue the investigation of its functions and pharmacology in lipid-complexed forms.

In line with its capacity to bind lipoprotein, CLCF1 has been shown to bind with high affinity to two lipoprotein receptors, sortilin and the sortilin-related multi-ligand receptor sorLA^59,60. It will be of interest to evaluate whether CLCF1-lipoportein complexes mediate specific functions through this receptors and whether lipoproteins modify CLCF1 pharmacology by targeting the cytokine to cells expressing sortilin, sorLA or other lipoprotein receptors.

CLCF1 is a regulator of kidney development, of glomerular function and is believed to be a permeability factor implicated in the development and recurrence of the progressive renal disease FSGS³³. Interestingly, depletion of lipoproteins by plasmapheresis is successfully used in treating FSGS and preventing kidney graft loss^59,60. Therefore, we suggest, that CLCF1 could be the critical factor that is removed from the patients’ circulation during plasmapheresis. Future investigation on the regulatory role of ApoE and lipoproteins on the glomerular effect of CLCF1 might open new therapeutic approaches to treat FSGS.

We investigated the effect of ApoE and lipoproteins on CLCF1 biological activity through CNTFR. These experiments were significantly complicated by the fact that most biological assays are carried out in the presence of serum that contain lipoproteins. We found that addition of lipoproteins in proliferation assays strongly modified the background response even when we used delipidated serum or serum-free media, and prevented interpretation of the results (data not shown). Therefore, our experiments focused on signalling assays that could be performed in serum-free solutions and condition in which lipoprotein alone had no effect on the signalling cascade investigated. Data obtained regarding STAT3 phosphorylation, a key CNTFR signalling molecule activated by CLCF1^5,6 indicate a significant modulation of the biological activity of CLCF1 by lipoproteins. Similar results were obtained with CNTFR transfectants and cell lines constitutively expressing CNTFR. Intriguingly, HDL-CLCF1 and LDL-CLCF1 complexes induced a slight but not significant increase of STAT3 phosphorylation in vitro compared to CLCF1 alone. The most striking effects were observed with VLDL: addition of this type of lipoprotein strongly reduced the induction of STAT3 phosphorylation by CLCF1. As VLDL did not inhibit CLCF1-CNTFR binding, this suggests that the binding of CLCF1 on VLDL interferes with the recruitment or the heterodimerization of the signaling chain LIFRβ and gp130. This prompted us to study the effect of VLDL in an in vivo assay in which activation of the CNTFR might be relevant for preclinical studies. Intraocular injection of either VLDL or CLCF1 in a mouse model of oxygen-induced retinopathy showed a beneficial effect on both retinal neovascularization and vaso-obliteration. No differences could be detected between VLDL alone and CLCF1 plus VLDL suggesting that the effect of CLCF1 is prevented by VLDL per se. Altogether, these results suggest that the cholesterolemic profile, (i.e. the concentration and the ratio between the different lipoproteins) could directly influence the biological activities of CLCF1 in functions such as neuron survival, immune response and metabolism. It would be of interest to investigate whether a disruption or an imbalance of CLCF1 activity regulation by lipoproteins could contribute to the deleterious effects observed in FSGS patients and whether recombinant ApoE or synthetic lipoprotein complexes could be beneficial in this pathology.

While our study focused on CLCF1, this cytokine shares biological activities and biochemical properties with other cytokines that may also interact with lipoproteins. Our results provide novel insight on lipoproteins and type 1 cytokine interactions and suggest that apolipoprotein- or lipoprotein-cytokine complexes could be used to modify the therapeutic properties of recombinant cytokines.

Methods

Production and purification of recombinant CLCF1

Mouse or human codon optimized synthetic cDNA (GeneArt™, Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc, Burlington, ON) coding for mature CLCF1 tagged with 6 his and a biotinylated Avitag⁶¹ or 6 his and a Flag (YKDDDDK) epitope were cloned in the expression vector pET24d (Novagen, Millipore Canada Ltd, Etobicoke, ON). The constructs were co-transformed with the BirA biotin-ligase coding vector pBirAcm (Avidity, Aurora, CO) in BL21 (DE3) (ThermoFisher Scientific). Expression was induced as described previously⁶² in THY medium supplemented with 12 mg/L biotin, 50 μg/ml kanamycin and 12.5 μg/ml chloramphenicol. Proteins were purified from the bacterial inclusion bodies by immobilized metal affinity chromatography⁶³. Purifications were performed according to the instructions of the manufacturer (Qiagen Inc, Toronto, ON) using LPS free reagents and detoxified glassware. The recombinant proteins were renatured by dialysis against decreasing concentrations of urea, 100 mM glycine pH 3.5, 1 mM reduced glutathione, 0.1 mM oxidized glutathione followed by 1 mM reduced glutathione, 0.1 mM oxidized glutathione in 4 mM HCl and lastly 4 mM HCl. Purified cytokine was detoxified using polymyxin B-agarose (Sigma-Aldrich, Oakville, ON) to endotoxin levels below 0.1 EU/μg protein, assessed using a Limulus endotoxin assay (Pierce, ThermoFisher Scientific). Biological activity was measured using Ba/F3 transfected with the cDNA coding for mouse or human gp130, LIFRβ and CNTFRα and a Alamar Blue proliferation assay⁶⁴.

Generation of transfectants co-expressing CLCF1 and ApoE

Synthetic cDNA coding for hCLCF1/hCLRF1, ApoE2, 3 and 4 or the combinations of hCLCF1/hCLRF1 modified by the insertion of sequences coding for T2A “self-cleaving peptides”⁶⁵ and the three ApoE isoforms were generated using synthetic cDNA (GeneArt™) and standard molecular biology methods⁶⁶. The mono or multicistronic cDNA were inserted in the expression vector pcDNA™5/FRT vector and stable Flp-In™−293 cells transfectants generated and maintained according the Flp-In™ instruction manual (ThermoFisher Scientific).

Analysis of CLCF1/ApoE interaction by co-immunoprecipitation

For co-immunoprecipitation assays between recombinant proteins, CLCF1 (200 ng) and ApoE 2, 3 or 4 (250 ng; BioVision, Cedarlane, Burlington, ON) were incubated alone or in combination for 16 h in 1 ml Opti-MEM™ (Life Technologies). CLCF1 was immunoprecipitated with 1 μg anti-CLCF1 mAb (R&D systems, Cedarlane, Burlington, ON) and 30 μl protein G agarose (Santa Cruz Biotechnology Inc, Dallas, TX). Co-immunprecipitated proteins were analyzed by Western Blotting (WB) using anti-CLCF1 or anti-ApoE mAbs (R&D systems, Cedarlane) and horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-labelled secondary Abs.

To analyze CLCF1-ApoE interaction in culture medium from Flp-In™ HEK-293 transfectants, cells stably transfected with pcDNA5 containing synthetic cDNAs coding for CLCF1/CRLF1, ApoE isotypes, combinations of these proteins or empty pcDNA™5/FRT were expanded to near confluence in DMEM supplemented with fetal calf serum (FCS) and then maintained for 5 days in Opti-MEM™ medium. Culture medium was concentrated 20 × by ultrafiltration centrifugation and analyzed for CLCF1 or ApoE by WB as described above. One ml concentrated culture medium aliquots were incubated with 1 μg rat anti-ApoE mAb (R&D systems) and 50 μl anti-rat Ig agarose resin (Sigma-Aldrich). Resin was washed with PBS and elution induced with 70 μl of 100 μM glycine pH 2.5 (glycine buffer). Neutralized eluates were analyzed by WB.

To investigate whether CLCF1 can form a complex with mouse serum ApoE, 30 μl aliquots of WT or ApoE^−/− mouse serum diluted 1:20 with PBS were incubated with or without 0.3 μg biotinylated mouse CLCF1 and 2.5 μg rabbit anti-mouse ApoE IgG for 16 h at 4 °C. Complexes were immunoprecipitated by adding 50 μl anti-rabbit Ig TrueBlot™ beads (Rockland Immunochemicals Inc, Limerick, PA). Beads were washed with 10 vol. PBS and retained proteins eluted with glycine buffer. Eluates were analyzed by WB using HRP-streptavidin (GE-Healthcare Life Science, Cedarlane, Burlington, ON) or rabbit anti-mouse ApoE Ab (Abcam Inc, Cedarlane) followed by HRP-labelled TrueBlot™ anti-rabbit Ab (Rockland Immunochemicals Inc).

To assess whether CLCF1 can form a complex with human serum ApoE, 50 μl aliquots human serum diluted 1:20 with PBS were incubated with or without 0.5 μg biotinylated CLCF1 and 2.5 μg rat-anti ApoE IgG for 16 h at 4 °C. Complexes immunoprecipitated by adding 50 μl anti-rat Ig agarose resin were washed with 10 vol. PBS. Glycine buffer eluates were analyzed by WB using HRP-streptavidin or rat-anti-ApoE and HRP-labelled anti-rat Ig.

Analysis of ApoE/CLCF1 complexes by fast protein liquid chromatography (FPLC)

Aliquots of human, WT mouse or ApoE^−/− mouse serum (50 μl) were mixed with 1 μg biotinylated human or mouse CLCF1 and fractionated by FPLC using on Superose 6™ HR 10/30 column at the Lipid and Lipid Metabolite Analysis Core Facility (University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB). The 40 FPLC fractions were analyzed for ApoE by WB using anti-mouse ApoE IgG as described above or biotinylated anti-human ApoE IgG (Abcam Inc) and HRP-labelled streptavidin. CLCF1 was detected using HRP-labelled streptavidin.

Analysis of ApoE-CLCF1 interaction by AlphaLISA

AlphaLISA protein-protein interaction assay was developed to evaluate CLCF1-ApoE interaction using streptavidin coated donor beads and anti-rat IgG acceptor beads (Perkin Elmer, Woodbridge, ON). ApoE2, 3 or 4 (0–100 nM) were mixed with CLCF1 (10 nM) in PBS 0.1% BSA for 1 h with rat IgG anti-ApoE (3 nM) (R&D systems, Cedarlane) and anti-rat IgG acceptor beads (10 μg/mL). Streptavidin donor beads (40 μg/mL) were further added for 1 h protected from light. Fluorescence was quantified using an Envision multilabel plate reader (Perkin Elmer). The signal without rat IgG anti-ApoE (background) was subtracted from the data.

The effect of lipid on CLCF1-ApoE interaction was assessed by AlphaLISA protein-protein interaction assay in presence of 1,2-dimyristoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine (DMPC) (0–1000 μM). ApoE2, 3, 4 (at 30 nM) were preincubated with increasing concentrations of DMPC for 1 h at 37 °C. ApoE-DMPC mix were further incubated with CLCF1 (at 10 nM) in PBS 0.1% BSA with rat IgG anti-ApoE (3 nM) and anti-rat IgG acceptor beads (10 μg/mL).Subsequently, streptavidin donor beads (40 μg/mL) were added and incubated for 1 h protected from light. Fluorescence was quantified as described above.

Lipoprotein biotinylation

Lipoproteins (HDL, VLDL, LDL, 500 μg aliquots; Alpha Aesar, Ward Hill, MA) were biotinylated using a Sulfo-NHS-Biotin Kit (Pierce, ThermoFisher Scientific) for 1 h at 37 °C. Biotinylated lipoproteins were separated from free biotin by gel filtration on Sephacryl S-100 (GE Healthcare). Biotinylation was assessed by WB. Lipoproteins were diluted in 50 mM Tris-HCL pH 8, 2 mM CaCl₂, 90 mM NaCl, 50 mg/ml BSA to a final concentration of 50 µg/ml for ligand blot experiments.

Ligand Blot experiments with biotinylated lipoproteins and immobilized CLCF1

Aliquots of recombinant human CLCF1 (100–200 ng) were subjected to SDS-PAGE and electro-transferred to nitrocellulose membrane. The membranes were blocked in 50 mM Tris-HCL pH 8, 2 mM CaCl₂, 90 mM NaCl, 50 mg/ml BSA and incubated with biotinylated lipoproteins at 50 μg/ml for 1 h. Membrane-bound lipoproteins were revealed using HRP-labelled neutravidin (ThermoFisher Scientific). One μg aliquots of LDLR, VLDLR, and SR-B1 (all from Alpha Aesar) were used as positive controls.

Analysis of lipoproteins-CLCF1 interaction by AlphaLISA

Lipoproteins-CLCF1 interactions were assessed by AlphaLISA proximity assay using streptavidin-coated donor beads and lipoproteins-conjugated AlphaLISA acceptor beads. For lipoproteins conjugations on acceptor beads, 500 μg of unconjugated acceptor beads (Perkin Elmer) where washed in PBS and centrifuged at 16 000 g for 15 min. The conjugation was performed by mixing the acceptor beads with 50 μg of LDL, HDL or VLDL in 200 μl of 130 mM phosphate buffer pH 8.0 containing 20 mM of NaBH₃CN. Beads where incubated for 18 h at 37 °C, washed twice in 200 μl of 100 mM Tris-HCl pH 8.0 and stored at 5 mg/mL in 100 mM Tris-HCl 0,01% sodium azide.

For the interaction assays, biotinylated CLCF1 (10 nM) was mixed in PBS 0.1% BSA for 1 h with LDL, HDL or VLDL-conjugated acceptor beads (10 μg/mL). Streptavidin donor beads (40 μg/mL) were further added for 1 h protected from light. Fluorescence was quantified using an Envision multilabel plate reader. The signal without CLCF1 (background) was subtracted from the data. The specificity of the signal was assessed by including increasing concentrations of unlabeled CLCF1 (0–1000 nM) in the interaction assay.

Quantification of CLCF1-induced STAT3 tyrosine phosphorylation

CLCF1 (100 ng/ml) was preincubated for 1 h at 37 °C with ApoE2, 3 or 4 (10 μg/ml) or purified HDL, LDL and VLDL (100 μg/ml; Alpha Aesar). Ba/F3 transfectants cells were starved for 4 h and stimulated for 15 min at 37 °C with CLCF1, ApoE (10 μg/ml), purified lipoprotein complexes (100 μg/ml) or combinations of these reagents in PBS. ARPE-19 retinal pigmented epithelial cells (American Type Culture Collection, Manassas, VA) were starved for 24 h, detached and stimulated for 5 min at 37 °C with CLCF1, purified lipoprotein complexes (100 μg/ml) or combinations of these reagents in PBS. For Western blot analysis, lysates of Ba/F3 transfectants were subjected to SDS-PAGE on 7.5% polyacrylamide gels and protein were electro-transferred to PVDF membranes. Total and phopho-STAT3 (Tyr 705) were detected using specific rabbit IgG (Cell signaling Technologies, Danvers, MA) and HRP-labelled anti-rabbit antibody (R&D systems, Cedarlane). For flow cytometry experiments, cells were fixed, permeabilized and stained with anti-phospho STAT3 Abs (from BD Biosciences, Mississauga, ON or eBioscience, Affimetrix, Cedarlane) as described previously^64,67. Fluorescence was quantified with a FACSCanto II flow cytometer (BD Biosciences).

CLCF1-CNTFR binding assays

CLCF1 (1 μg/ml) was preincubated for 1 h at 37 °C with ApoE2, 3 or 4 (10 μg/ml) or purified HDL, LDL and VLDL (100 μg/ml). Ba/F3 tranfectants, IMR32 neuroblastoma cells, or 3T3-L1 fibroblasts were incubated for 1 h on ice in PBS 0.1% BSA alone or supplemented with biotinylated CLCF1 (1 μg/ml), ApoE (10 μg/ml), lipoproteins complexes (100 μg/ml) or combinations of these reagents. CLCF1 binding was revealed using PE-labelled streptavidin (1 μg/ml) and flow cytometry⁶⁸.

Oxygen Induced Retinopathy

All procedures conformed to the Canadian Council on Animal Care guidelines and were approved by the Animal Ethics Committee of the Maisonneuve-Rosemont Hospital Research Centre. C57BL/6 mice were purchased from The Jackson Laboratory, Bar Arbor, ME. Mouse pups and their fostering mothers (CD1, Charles River) were exposed to 75% O₂ from P7 to P12 and returned to room air⁵⁷. This model serves as a proxy to human ocular neovascular diseases such as diabetic retinopathy, which is characterized by a late phase of destructive pathological angiogenesis^69,70. Mice were injected intraoccularly at P12 with CLCF1 (final intraocular concentration: 100 ng/mL), VLDL (10 μg/mL) or a combination of both. The retinas were dissected at P17, flatten mounted and incubated overnight with fluoresceinated isolectin B4 (1:100) in 1 mM CaCl₂ to determine extent of avascular area or neovascularization area using ImageJ and the SWIFT-neovascularization method⁷¹.

References

Shi, Y. et al. Computational EST database analysis identifies a novel member of the neuropoietic cytokine family. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 262, 132–138, https://doi.org/10.1006/bbrc.1999.1181 (1999).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Senaldi, G. et al. Novel neurotrophin-1/B cell-stimulating factor-3: a cytokine of the IL-6 family. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 96, 11458–11463 (1999).
Article ADS CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Elson, G. C. et al. Cytokine-like factor-1, a novel soluble protein, shares homology with members of the cytokine type I receptor family. J Immunol 161, 1371–1379 (1998).
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Herholz, J. et al. Differential secretion of the mutated protein is a major component affecting phenotypic severity in CRLF1-associated disorders. Eur J Hum Genet 19, 525–533, https://doi.org/10.1038/ejhg.2010.253 (2011).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Elson, G. C. et al. CLF associates with CLC to form a functional heteromeric ligand for the CNTF receptor complex. Nat Neurosci 3, 867–872, https://doi.org/10.1038/78765 (2000).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Lelievre, E. et al. Signaling pathways recruited by the cardiotrophin-like cytokine/cytokine-like factor-1 composite cytokine: specific requirement of the membrane-bound form of ciliary neurotrophic factor receptor alpha component. J Biol Chem 276, 22476–22484, https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M101681200 (2001).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Bloch, J. et al. Neuroprotective gene therapy for Huntington’s disease, using polymer-encapsulated cells engineered to secrete human ciliary neurotrophic factor: results of a phase I study. Hum Gene Ther 15, 968–975, https://doi.org/10.1089/hum.2004.15.968 (2004).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Miller, R. G. et al. Toxicity and tolerability of recombinant human ciliary neurotrophic factor in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Neurology 47, 1329–1331 (1996).
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Miller, R. G. et al. A placebo-controlled trial of recombinant human ciliary neurotrophic (rhCNTF) factor in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. rhCNTF ALS Study Group. Ann Neurol 39, 256–260, https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.410390215 (1996).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Aebischer, P. et al. Intrathecal delivery of CNTF using encapsulated genetically modified xenogeneic cells in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis patients. Nat Med 2, 696–699 (1996).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Zhang, K. et al. Ciliary neurotrophic factor delivered by encapsulated cell intraocular implants for treatment of geographic atrophy in age-related macular degeneration. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108, 6241–6245, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1018987108 (2011).
Article ADS CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Gloaguen, I. et al. Ciliary neurotrophic factor corrects obesity and diabetes associated with leptin deficiency and resistance. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 94, 6456–6461 (1997).
Article ADS CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Lambert, P. D. et al. Ciliary neurotrophic factor activates leptin-like pathways and reduces body fat, without cachexia or rebound weight gain, even in leptin-resistant obesity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98, 4652–4657, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.061034298 (2001).
Article ADS CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Zvonic, S., Cornelius, P., Stewart, W. C., Mynatt, R. L. & Stephens, J. M. The regulation and activation of ciliary neurotrophic factor signaling proteins in adipocytes. J Biol Chem 278, 2228–2235, https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M205871200 (2003).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Helgren, M. E. et al. Trophic effect of ciliary neurotrophic factor on denervated skeletal muscle. Cell 76, 493–504 (1994).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Watt, M. J. et al. CNTF reverses obesity-induced insulin resistance by activating skeletal muscle AMPK. Nat Med 12, 541–548, https://doi.org/10.1038/nm1383 (2006).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Ettinger, M. P. et al. Recombinant variant of ciliary neurotrophic factor for weight loss in obese adults: a randomized, dose-ranging study. JAMA 289, 1826–1832, https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.289.14.1826 (2003).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Bays, H. E. Current and investigational antiobesity agents and obesity therapeutic treatment targets. Obes Res 12, 1197–1211, https://doi.org/10.1038/oby.2004.151 (2004).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
DeChiara, T. M. et al. Mice lacking the CNTF receptor, unlike mice lacking CNTF, exhibit profound motor neuron deficits at birth. Cell 83, 313–322 (1995).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Sendtner, M., Carroll, P., Holtmann, B., Hughes, R. A. & Thoenen, H. Ciliary neurotrophic factor. J Neurobiol 25, 1436–1453, https://doi.org/10.1002/neu.480251110 (1994).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Stockli, K. A. et al. Molecular cloning, expression and regional distribution of rat ciliary neurotrophic factor. Nature 342, 920–923, https://doi.org/10.1038/342920a0 (1989).
Article ADS CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Takahashi, R. et al. A null mutation in the human CNTF gene is not causally related to neurological diseases. Nat Genet 7, 79–84, https://doi.org/10.1038/ng0594-79 (1994).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Alexander, W. S. et al. Suckling defect in mice lacking the soluble haemopoietin receptor NR6. Curr Biol 9, 605–608 (1999).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Zou, X. et al. Neonatal death in mice lacking cardiotrophin-like cytokine is associated with multifocal neuronal hypoplasia. Veterinary pathology 46, 514–519, https://doi.org/10.1354/vp.08-VP-0239-B-BC (2009).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Forger, N. G. et al. Cardiotrophin-like cytokine/cytokine-like factor 1 is an essential trophic factor for lumbar and facial motoneurons in vivo. J Neurosci 23, 8854–8858 (2003).
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Hahn, A. F. et al. Cold-induced sweating syndrome: CISS1 and CISS2: manifestations from infancy to adulthood. Four new cases. J Neurol Sci 293, 68–75, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jns.2010.02.028 (2010).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Dagoneau, N. et al. Mutations in cytokine receptor-like factor 1 (CRLF1) account for both Crisponi and cold-induced sweating syndromes. Am J Hum Genet 80, 966–970, https://doi.org/10.1086/513608 (2007).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Dagoneau, N. et al. Null leukemia inhibitory factor receptor (LIFR) mutations in Stuve-Wiedemann/Schwartz-Jampel type 2 syndrome. Am J Hum Genet 74, 298–305, https://doi.org/10.1086/381715 (2004).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Knappskog, P. M. et al. Cold-induced sweating syndrome is caused by mutations in the CRLF1 gene. Am J Hum Genet 72, 375–383, https://doi.org/10.1086/346120 (2003).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Sleeman, M. W., Anderson, K. D., Lambert, P. D., Yancopoulos, G. D. & Wiegand, S. J. The ciliary neurotrophic factor and its receptor, CNTFR alpha. Pharm Acta Helv 74, 265–272 (2000).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Schmidt-Ott, K. M. et al. Novel regulators of kidney development from the tips of the ureteric bud. J Am Soc Nephrol 16, 1993–2002, https://doi.org/10.1681/ASN.2004121127 (2005).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Aljabari, S., Howard, E., Bell, T. & Vasylyeva, T. L. Cold induced sweating syndrome with urinary system anomaly association. Case reports in pediatrics 2013, 173890, https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/173890 (2013).
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
McCarthy, E. T., Sharma, M. & Savin, V. J. Circulating permeability factors in idiopathic nephrotic syndrome and focal segmental glomerulosclerosis. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 5, 2115–2121, https://doi.org/10.2215/CJN.03800609 (2010).
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Gbadegesin, R., Lavin, P., Foreman, J. & Winn, M. Pathogenesis and therapy of focal segmental glomerulosclerosis: an update. Pediatric nephrology 26, 1001–1015, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00467-010-1692-x (2011).
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Candiano, G. et al. Apolipoproteins prevent glomerular albumin permeability induced in vitro by serum from patients with focal segmental glomerulosclerosis. J Am Soc Nephrol 12, 143–150 (2001).
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Koizumi, J. et al. Removal of apolipoprotein E-enriched high density lipoprotein by LDL-apheresis in familial hypercholesterolaemia: a possible activation of the reverse cholesterol transport system. Atherosclerosis 74, 1–8 (1988).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Kawasaki, Y. et al. Long-term efficacy of low-density lipoprotein apheresis for focal and segmental glomerulosclerosis. Pediatric nephrology 22, 889–892, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00467-006-0426-6 (2007).
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Hattori, M. et al. A combined low-density lipoprotein apheresis and prednisone therapy for steroid-resistant primary focal segmental glomerulosclerosis in children. American journal of kidney diseases: the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation 42, 1121–1130 (2003).
Article Google Scholar
Gutman, C. R., Strittmatter, W. J., Weisgraber, K. H. & Matthew, W. D. Apolipoprotein E binds to and potentiates the biological activity of ciliary neurotrophic factor. J Neurosci 17, 6114–6121 (1997).
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Malek, G. et al. Apolipoprotein E allele-dependent pathogenesis: a model for age-related retinal degeneration. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102, 11900–11905, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0503015102 (2005).
Article ADS CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Loane, E., McKay, G. J., Nolan, J. M. & Beatty, S. Apolipoprotein E genotype is associated with macular pigment optical density. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 51, 2636–2643, https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.09-4397 (2010).
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Sun, E. et al. Apolipoprotein E gene and age-related macular degeneration in a Chinese population. Mol Vis 17, 997–1002 (2011).
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Joyal, J. S. et al. Retinal lipid and glucose metabolism dictates angiogenesis through the lipid sensor Ffar1. Nat Med 22, 439–445, https://doi.org/10.1038/nm.4059 (2016).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Kauper, K. et al. Two-year intraocular delivery of ciliary neurotrophic factor by encapsulated cell technology implants in patients with chronic retinal degenerative diseases. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 53, 7484–7491, https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.12-9970 (2012).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Thanos, C. G. et al. Sustained secretion of ciliary neurotrophic factor to the vitreous, using the encapsulated cell therapy-based NT-501 intraocular device. Tissue Eng 10, 1617–1622, https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.2004.10.1617 (2004).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Wen, R., Tao, W., Li, Y. & Sieving, P. A. CNTF and retina. Prog Retin Eye Res 31, 136–151, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.preteyeres.2011.11.005 (2012).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Hatters, D. M., Budamagunta, M. S., Voss, J. C. & Weisgraber, K. H. Modulation of apolipoprotein E structure by domain interaction: differences in lipid-bound and lipid-free forms. J Biol Chem 280, 34288–34295, https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M506044200 (2005).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Hatters, D. M., Peters-Libeu, C. A. & Weisgraber, K. H. Apolipoprotein E structure: insights into function. Trends Biochem Sci 31, 445–454, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibs.2006.06.008 (2006).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Poirier, J. et al. Apolipoprotein E and lipid homeostasis in the etiology and treatment of sporadic Alzheimer’s disease. Neurobiology of aging 35(Suppl 2), S3–10, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2014.03.037 (2014).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Raffai, R. L. Apolipoprotein E regulation of myeloid cell plasticity in atherosclerosis. Curr Opin Lipidol 23, 471–478, https://doi.org/10.1097/MOL.0b013e328356f967 (2012).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
de Silva, H. V., Mas-Oliva, J., Taylor, J. M. & Mahley, R. W. Identification of apolipoprotein B-100 low density lipoproteins, apolipoprotein B-48 remnants, and apolipoprotein E-rich high density lipoproteins in the mouse. Journal of lipid research 35, 1297–1310 (1994).
PubMed Google Scholar
Jawien, J., Nastalek, P. & Korbut, R. Mouse models of experimental atherosclerosis. Journal of physiology and pharmacology: an official journal of the Polish Physiological Society 55, 503–517 (2004).
CAS Google Scholar
Wade, D. P., Knight, B. L. & Soutar, A. K. Detection of the low-density-lipoprotein receptor with biotin-low-density lipoprotein. A rapid new method for ligand blotting. The Biochemical journal 229, 785–790 (1985).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Krutzik, P. O., Hale, M. B. & Nolan, G. P. Characterization of the murine immunological signaling network with phosphospecific flow cytometry. J Immunol 175, 2366–2373 (2005).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Conference on Health Effects of Blood Lipids–Optimal Distributions for, P., Wynder, E. L. & American Health, F. Plasma lipids: optimal levels for health (1980).
Smith, L. E. et al. Oxygen-induced retinopathy in the mouse. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 35, 101–111 (1994).
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Miloudi, K. et al. Assessment of vascular regeneration in the CNS using the mouse retina. J Vis Exp, e51351, https://doi.org/10.3791/51351 (2014).
Bucher, F. et al. CNTF Attenuates Vasoproliferative Changes Through Upregulation of SOCS3 in a Mouse-Model of Oxygen-Induced Retinopathy. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 57, 4017–4026, https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.15-18508 (2016).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Larsen, J. V. et al. Cytokine-Like Factor 1, an Essential Facilitator of Cardiotrophin-Like Cytokine:Ciliary Neurotrophic Factor Receptor alpha Signaling and sorLA-Mediated Turnover. Mol Cell Biol 36, 1272–1286, https://doi.org/10.1128/MCB.00917-15 (2016).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Larsen, J. V. et al. Sortilin facilitates signaling of ciliary neurotrophic factor and related helical type 1 cytokines targeting the gp130/leukemia inhibitory factor receptor beta heterodimer. Mol Cell Biol 30, 4175–4187, https://doi.org/10.1128/MCB.00274-10 (2010).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Beckett, D., Kovaleva, E. & Schatz, P. J. A minimal peptide substrate in biotin holoenzyme synthetase-catalyzed biotinylation. Protein Sci 8, 921–929, https://doi.org/10.1110/ps.8.4.921 (1999).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Cognet, I. et al. Expression of recombinant proteins in a lipid A mutant of Escherichia coli BL21 with a strongly reduced capacity to induce dendritic cell activation and maturation. J Immunol Methods 272, 199–210 (2003).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Crowe, J. et al. 6xHis-Ni-NTA chromatography as a superior technique in recombinant protein expression/purification. Methods Mol Biol 31, 371–387, https://doi.org/10.1385/0-89603-258-2:371 (1994).
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Tormo, A. J. et al. The cytokines cardiotrophin-like cytokine/cytokine-like factor-1 (CLC/CLF) and ciliary neurotrophic factor (CNTF) differ in their receptor specificities. Cytokine 60, 653–660, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cyto.2012.08.014 (2012).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Szymczak, A. L. et al. Correction of multi-gene deficiency in vivo using a single ‘self-cleaving’ 2A peptide-based retroviral vector. Nat Biotechnol 22, 589–594, https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt957 (2004).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Sambrook, J., Fritsch,EF., Maniatis, T. Molecular Cloning. A laboratory manual. Second edition. (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, 1989).
Crabe, S. et al. The IL-27 p28 subunit binds cytokine-like factor 1 to form a cytokine regulating NK and T cell activities requiring IL-6R for signaling. J Immunol 183, 7692–7702, https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.0901464 (2009).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Cognet, I. et al. Cardiotrophin-like cytokine labelling using Bir A biotin ligase: a sensitive tool to study receptor expression by immune and non-immune cells. J Immunol Methods 301, 53–65, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jim.2005.03.012 (2005).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Sapieha, P. et al. Retinopathy of prematurity: understanding ischemic retinal vasculopathies at an extreme of life. J Clin Invest 120, 3022–3032, https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI42142 (2010).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Stahl, A. et al. The mouse retina as an angiogenesis model. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 51, 2813–2826, https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.10-5176 (2010).
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Stahl, A. et al. Computer-aided quantification of retinal neovascularization. Angiogenesis 12, 297–301, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10456-009-9155-3 (2009).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are very grateful to Prof. Dr. Jürgen Scheller (Institut für Biochemie und Molekularbiologie II, Heinrich-Heine Universität Düsseldorf, Germany) for the kind gift of hCNTFR-expressing Ba/F3 cells. We thank the Institute for Research in Immunology and Cancer (IRIC) genomic platform for the DNA sequencing as well as Dr. Sebastien Guiral and Dr. Jean Duchaine from the IRIC HTS core facility for the AlphaLISA signal measurements. We are grateful to Mr. Audric Moses (Lipid and Lipid Metabolite Analysis Core Facility, University of Alberta) for the FPLC fractionations. This work was supported by The Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) grant MOP-57832 to J.F.G. S.P. was supported by a fellowship from the Frederick Banting and Charles Best Canada Graduate Scholarship-Masters (CIHR), and a doctoral scholarship from the Fond de Recherche Santé Québec (FRQS).

Author information

Sarah Pasquin and Salma Chehboun contributed equally to this work.

Authors and Affiliations

Département de pharmacologie et physiologie, Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, H3T 1J4, Canada
Sarah Pasquin, Salma Chehboun, Yasmine Meliani, Aurélie Tormo & Jean-François Gauchat
Département de Biochimie et Médecine Moléculaire, Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, H3T 1J4, Canada
Agnieszka Dejda & Przemyslaw Sapieha
Renal Division, KCVA Medical Center, Kansas City, MO, 64128-2226, USA
Virginia Savin & Mukut Sharma
Perkin Elmer, 940 Winter Street, Waltham, MA, 02451, USA
Gregory J. Warner & Roger Bosse
Faculté de Pharmacie, Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, H3T 1J4, Canada
Gaétan Mayer
Département de Médecine, Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, H3T 1J4, Canada
Catherine Martel

Authors

Sarah Pasquin
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Salma Chehboun
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Agnieszka Dejda
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Yasmine Meliani
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Virginia Savin
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Gregory J. Warner
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Roger Bosse
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Aurélie Tormo
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Gaétan Mayer
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Mukut Sharma
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Przemyslaw Sapieha
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Catherine Martel
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Jean-François Gauchat
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

S.P. designed and performed AlphaLISA experiments, proliferations, binding and STAT3 phosphorylation assays, analyzed data and wrote the paper. S.C. designed and performed co-immunoprecipitation assays, the ligand blotting experiments and the WB assays on the FPLC-fractionated serum. A.D. and P.S. designed and performed all intraocular injections in mice model of retinopathy and generated and analyzed the corresponding data. Y.M. and A.T. did the preliminary experiments for the CLCF1-ApoE co-immunoprecipitations. G.W. and R.B. helped design AlphaLISA experiments. J.F.G. conceived and supervised the project, analyzed data and wrote the paper. C.M., G.M., V.S. and M.S. contributed to the conception of the study, the analysis of the data and the revision of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jean-François Gauchat.

Ethics declarations

Competing Interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Supplementary Figure 1

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pasquin, S., Chehboun, S., Dejda, A. et al. Effect of human very low-density lipoproteins on cardiotrophin-like cytokine factor 1 (CLCF1) activity. Sci Rep 8, 3990 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-22400-y

Download citation

Received: 03 January 2017
Accepted: 15 January 2018
Published: 05 March 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-22400-y

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.