Abstract
The Old World non-human primates (NHP) - baboons (Papio spp.) share similarities with humans regarding fetal and placental development and some pregnancy-related complications. Information about the mechanism of birth and complications arising during parturition in these species is relatively sparse. In this manuscript, we add information from a series of pathological and observational cases to highlight insights and selected complications of birth in Papio spp, based on video-recording of the delivery process, X-ray, MRI, and ultrasound evaluations in pregnant baboons. Additionally, we abstracted pathology records obtained from perinatal loss in a large baboon colony during a 17 year period. The presented cases provide important information for the management of pregnancy and delivery in Papio spp.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Successful vaginal delivery involves an intricate interaction between the fetus and the maternal bony pelvis as the infant negotiates the birth canal via a mechanism of rotations of the presented part during the descent through the maternal pelvis. Increased fatness of the infant1, increased brain size in the fetus2, and constrains of the bipedalism and straight posture on the size and shape of the maternal pelvis3 in humans are associated with numerous potential opportunities for complications4.
The Old World non-human primates (NHP) - baboons (Papio spp.)5 share similarities with humans regarding mechanisms, regulating reproduction6, fetal and placental development and some pregnancy-related complications5,7,8. However information about the mechanism of birth and the complications arising during parturition in these species is relatively sparse.
The observations by Yeligulashvili9, representing cumulative data on over 200 births spanning a 16 year period in the Sukhumi nursery, remain one of the largest reports documenting labor in NHP. The author catalogued a number of observations on conditions associated with reproductive success in this colony and reported several characteristics of baboon parturition including the relative frequency of fetal presentation in labor (most often a face presentation with the head fully extended) and that the vast majority of births happened at night. He reported that delivery in the breech position was associated with a high rate of loss, recalling only two live births delivered breech. The nocturnal predilection of time of birth was thought to allow the pregnant female to move with the troupe during daytime to forage and not to be caught alone and relatively unprotected due to a daytime delivery. The nocturnal switch in the frequency and amplitude of the uterine contractility has been confirmed in these species by Nathanielsz’s group10. Although the uterine contractility patterns around the time of deliveries have been described in detail11,12 direct observations of the birthing process have only rarely been reported9,13,14,15.
In this manuscript, we add information from a series of pathological and observational cases to highlight insights and selected complications of birth in Papio spp. based on video-recording of the delivery process, X-ray, MRI and ultrasound evaluations in pregnant baboons, and pathology records obtained from perinatal loss in a large baboon colony during a 17 year period5,16.
Materials and Methods
Animal housing, characteristics and study design
Animals were housed in animal facilities at the Southwest National Primate Research Center, Texas Biomedical Research Institute (SNPRC), as described in detail elsewhere5 and in individual cages in the ALLAAC approved animal facilities at the Department of Comparative Medicine, University of Tennessee Health Science Center17. All protocols were approved by Texas Biomedical Research Institute, University of Texas at San Antonio, or University of Tennessee Health Science Center IACUC Committees and all methods were performed in accordance with the relevant guidelines and regulations. The detailed pathological evaluations were performed in cases of maternal and fetal death/euthanasia. Pathology records (17 years) of the baboon colony were analyzed for the presence of dystocia and selected cases with documented diagnosis of dystocia are reviewed in the present manuscript. Additionally incidental findings pertaining to pregnancy and dissection of the pelvic floor in diseased animals were performed. The characteristics of the animals are listed in Table 1.
Results
Dystocia cases (#1- #10)
Diagnosis of labor dystocia in the pathology records was documented in 70 cases, including 15 cases of breech presentation during the 17 years’ time period. During this period, there were 1021 cesarean deliveries, 5195 vaginal deliveries, 191 stillbirths/abortions with total number of deliveries 6449 and 1.09 cases of dystocia per 100 deliveries.
Photographic documentations of the fetal and or maternal condition were available in ten of the 70 cases (Table 1). All but one of the photo-documented cases, were associated with facial presentation and fetal demise. Additional morphometric fetal measurements were available for each case of dystocia and are presented on Table 1S (Supplementary material). In two out of ten cases the fetus was female. Fetal weight ranged from 764 g to 1248 g and the weight of the fetal brain from 80.4 g to 107.3 g.
The gross pathological appearance of fetuses of dystocia cases had one common feature - noticeable edema and bruising of the snout (Figure 1S.1A, case #2, Supplementary material) with bruising in frontal and midsagittal areas of the skull and absence of scalp molding (Figure 1S.1B, Supplementary material). In cases #2 and #5 there was visible bruising at the low uterine segment and utero-cervical junction suggesting that there had been a protracted dystocia (Figure 1S.1C and D, case #2, Supplementary material). In case #8, a posterior rupture of the cervix/vaginal junction took place (Fig. 1S.2, Supplementary material). In all three these cases (#2, #5, and #8), the fetal faces were engaged in a partially dilated (2.5–3 cm) cervix or pelvis.
Maternal complications
Cases #8 and #13
Maternal delivery complications included cases of uterine rupture and retained placenta. Maternal humane euthanasia due to deteriorating maternal conditions was performed in severe cases. The examination of the uterus in case #13 showed a short, dilated cervix, and lower uterine segment (Figure 1S.3A,E, Supplementary material), placenta was adherent in the uterine fundus (Figure 1S.1B, C and D, Supplementary material).
Cases #11, #12 and, #16
At 147 days of gestation (human equivalent of 32 weeks gestation) (Fig. 1S.4A and B), case #11) the fetus had occipital presentation and the cervical canal was closed. The same finding was present in case #12 and #16 (Fig. 1S 4, Supplementary material).
Uncomplicated deliveries
Imaging (case #17)
MRI. The MRI picture, obtained at 147 days show that the uterine wall thickness in the baboon is less than that seen in the human uterus when analyzed at a comparable gestational age. There is also less fetal adipose tissue and a lesser amount of amniotic fluid around the fetal baboon compared to that typically seen around the human fetus at an equivalent gestational age (Figure 2S, Supplementary material).
Ultrasound evaluation. (cases #18 and #19). The ultrasound evaluation of a term baboon fetus (Figure 3S, Supplementary material) shows the snout engaged in the pelvis shortly prior to the onset of labor (Figure 3SA, Supplementary material). The head was extended with facial presentation. The length of the cervix was 4.02 cm (Figure 3SB, Supplementary material). These images were obtained during performance of an experimental protocol17. The fetus was externally rotated into the breech presentation for the experimental intervention and then positioned back into cephalic presentation at the end of the surgery. Pre-intervention ultrasonography revealed low amniotic fluid volume; therefore 250 ml of warm saline solution were instilled during the procedure to facilitate the manipulation and operative intervention. It was observed that this infusion resulted in dilation of internal cervical os and eventual rupture of the fetal membranes. The animal delivered a healthy female infant 72 h after the fetal procedure.
Video-taping (case #20). We were able to capture the birth process of a baboon Case #20 on videotape (Addendum). During the second stage of this videotaped labor, several maternal expulsive bursts were observed in rapid order of initial brief (5 seconds) pushing efforts brought the snout down to be visible through the introitus, but the presented part of the fetus did not stay on the perineum at the introitus between expulsive efforts (Fig. 1A–C). After three sucessive efforts, a sustained push with a duration of 17 second resulted in snout fixation (Fig. 1D). During the pentultimate pushing effort which lasted eight seconds, the head was born in a facial anterior presentation (Fig. 1E–G). Following expulsion of the head pointed toward the ventral side of the mother, it rotated 90° and a final push effected delivery of the body of the newborn so that the fetus was able to placed on the ground in prone anterior position. Placenta was delivered shortly after and eaten. The animal did not vocalize during labor.
Anatomy of the pelvic floor (cases #14 and #15)
Pelvic dissections in old nulliparous (Figure 4SA, Supplementary material) and young multiparous (Figure 4SB, Supplementary material) baboons showed, that vaginal musculature was enveloped in well-developed connective tissue which was dissected from the levator complex (Figure 4SA,B Supplementary material). The pubocaudalis extended from the medial surface of the puboischiatic symphysis to converge and attach to second and third caudal vertebrae. The iliocaudalis originated directly from the pelvic brim. The arcus tendineus fascia pelvis were absent in baboons. The vaginal muscularis was enveloped in connective tissue that suspends the vaginal wall and urethra to the pubo- and ilio-caudalis musculature. The homologous puborectalis muscles were absent; the retractor recti originated at the sacrum and encircled the anterolateral sides of the rectum.
Discussion
Observations of labor and deliveries in baboons and macaques (rhesus and lapunders) were described by Yeligulashvili in 19559 in the largest-to-date study regarding documentation of labor in non-human primates (106 baboons and 117 macaques). The author observed that the majority of pregnant dams are carrying a fetus in a longitudinal position during the last month of pregnancy and frequency of delivery in facial presentation was 62% and occipital presentation was 37% among fetuses delivering in the vertex presentation. This high rate of extended face presentation stands in contradistinction to chimpanzees and humans which have almost exclusively occipital presentation during labor. Birth in chimpanzees occurs predominantly in the posterior occipital position, while in humans this position is present in only 3% of deliveries12,18. Stoller performed radiographic evaluation of the delivery process in four baboons19 and described head extension and facial presentation in all cases studied. He also reported a breech delivery with an intrapartum death. In our case series, we showed the presence of head extension and the beginning of cervical dilation on ultrasound examination at least 2 days prior to delivery.
Because of the high incidence of reproductive loss, some veterinarians have recommended external version of the baboon fetus in case of breech presentation as an alternative to either vaginal breech or Cesarean delivery of the fetus in labor20. It is difficult to estimate the number of perinatal losses due to breech presentation in baboons but historical and anecdotal data from veterinarian experiences support the fact that it is a prominent reproductive hazard. However, the baboon fetus has higher mobility, compared to human: Yeligulashvili described numerous instances of the fetus in a breech presentation within 24 h of delivery, only to spontaneously convert to a cephalic presentation for birth. He reported about a 16% rate of breech delivery and a large stillbirth risk associated with this delivery position, recalling only two live births from a breech fetus even with assistance at delivery.
The reasons for the poor survival with breech birth may be due to a combination of factors. In our work, we show that the hip circumference in the fetal baboon is less than the abdominal, chest and head circumferences. Since the breech presentation is a compound one, (with feet and buttock as presenting parts), the total circumference of the dilating wedge could be comparable with the head circumference, but more likely the dilating wedge is smaller. Partial delivery through an incompletely dilated cervix may lengthen the transit time with a breech presentation beyond the usually short birth process. In addition, in contrast to the head extension seen in most baboon deliveries, a breech delivery leads to a prolonged delay in the clearance of the airway at delivery increasing the likelihood of birth asphyxia.
The decreased amount of amniotic fluid combined with the thinner uterine wall at the end of gestation, and absence of the well-developed lower uterine segment, compared to humans, might be involved in the mechanism of the head extension rather than flexion (observed in Homo sapiens) of baboon fetuses prior to their delivery. Based on these data the dimensions of the fetal head to be measured for the accessing labor prognosis, delivery and fetal development in the baboons should be submento-bregmaticus, sub-occipito-bregmaticus and verticomento diameters19.
The baboon fetus has less percentage of adipose tissue and a greater degree of muscle tissue compared to human fetus21. This difference might affect timing of labor, since subcutaneous adipose tissue may function as an endocrine organ which interacts with the placenta22,23.
We have previously reported on reproductive loss in the baboon5,16 and in the current report we have included a number of cases which highlight both the normal mechanisms of labor as well as traumatic causes of reproductive loss. The investigation into causes of loss in baboons is hampered by the fact that the birth is usually not witnessed and the majority of baboon placentas are consumed at birth and therefore not available for pathologic evaluation5.
It appears that while the mechanisms of birth in baboons are less complicated compared to humans, traumatic delivery and dystocia still are factors in the reproductive success16. The incidence of the dystocia, reported in this manuscript, is less than reported for some geographical regions in humans (12.2%)24, but within the range with some other reports (0.96%)25. The fetal baboon head does not undergo much molding during labor19 and the complex rotational movement that the human fetus experiences to exploit the gynecoid birthing adaptations of the female human pelvis are not seen in NHP26,27. The baboon parturient delivers her fetus without assistance13,15. Breech delivery appears to be a traumatic event in both the human and NHP28. Similarly, absolute cephalopelvic disproportion and birth dystocia can lead to both maternal and fetal morbidity and mortality29,30.
Duration of the third stage of labor which is the time from delivery of the fetus to expulsion of the placenta has been reported to last up to two hours in baboons in the wild and pathologic retained placenta is rare in these species31. However, in the baboon breeding colonies retained placenta was the most common cause of clinical admission32 and severe bleeding, leading to maternal death/euthanasia was documented in 0.6% cases32. Despite this fact, the diagnosis of placenta accreta is non-existing in the primatology bibliography. Documented in the present study case is the only one, indicating possible presence of abnormally deep invasion in this species, which parallels cesarean scar placentation in humans33,34,35.
We were not able to observe clear separation of the puborectalis part of the levator ani muscle groups in the baboon, while other authors described such presence36,37. Interestingly, vaginal prolapse (associated the damage of the puborectal muscle in humans) is very rare in baboons38.
In conclusion, the presented cases provide examples of normal and pathologic instances of the parturition process in the baboon. From these data, important information for the management of pregnancy and delivery in the non-human primates can be inferred.
References
Cunnane, S. C. & Crawford, M. A. Survival of the fattest: fat babies were the key to evolution of the large human brain. Comparative biochemistry and physiology. Part A, Molecular & integrative physiology 136, 17–26 (2003).
DeSilva, J. M. & Lesnik, J. J. Brain size at birth throughout human evolution: a new method for estimating neonatal brain size in hominins. Journal of human evolution 55, 1064–1074, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhevol.2008.07.008 (2008).
Weiner, S., Monge, J. & Mann, A. Bipedalism and parturition: an evolutionary imperative for cesarean delivery? Clinics in perinatology 35, 469–478, ix, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clp.2008.06.003 (2008).
Filippi, V., Chou D., Ronsmans C., Graham W., Say L. In Reproductive, Maternal, Newborn, and Child Health: Disease Control Priorities Vol. 2 (ed Black R. E. et al.) (The World Bank, 2016).
Schenone, M. H. et al. Abruptio placentae in the baboon (Papio spp.). Placenta 33, 278–284, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.placenta.2011.12.019 (2012).
Fazleabas, A. T. Progesterone resistance in a baboon model of endometriosis. Seminars in reproductive medicine 28, 75–80, https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0029-1242997 (2010).
Carter, A. M. Comparative studies of placentation and immunology in non-human primates suggest a scenario for the evolution of deep trophoblast invasion and an explanation for human pregnancy disorders. Reproduction (Cambridge, England) 141, 391–396, https://doi.org/10.1530/rep-10-0530 (2011).
Carter, A. M., Enders, A. C. & Pijnenborg, R. The role of invasive trophoblast in implantation and placentation of primates. Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences 370, 20140070, https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2014.0070 (2015).
Yeligulashvili, L. S. Gestation and Parturition in apes and monkeys. PhD thesis Moscow Russia (1955).
Bievenue, A. M., Jenkins, S. L. & Nathanielsz, P. W. The effects of photoperiod on the switching of myometrial contractility patterns of pregnant baboons: relationship to surgery and parturition. Journal of the Society for Gynecologic Investigation 9, 27–31 (2002).
Nathanielsz, P. W. et al. Regulation of the switch from myometrial contractures to contractions in late pregnancy: studies in the pregnant sheep and monkey. Reproduction, fertility, and development 7, 595–602 (1995).
Smith, R. Parturition. The New England journal of medicine 356, 271–283, https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMra061360 (2007).
Abegglen, H. & Abegglen, J. J. Field observation of a birth in hamadryas baboons. Folia Primatol (Basel) 26, (54–56 (1976).
Love, J. A. A note on the birth of a baboon (Papio anubis). Folia primatologica; international journal of primatology 29, 303–306 (1978).
Dunbar, R. I. & Dunbar, P. Behavior related to birth in wild gelada baboons (Theropithecus gelada). Behaviour 50, 185–191 (1974).
Schlabritz-Loutsevitch, N. E. et al. The baboon model (Papio hamadryas) of fetal loss: maternal weight, age, reproductive history and pregnancy outcome. Journal of medical primatology 37, 337–345, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0684.2008.00297.x (2008).
Mari, G. et al. A novel translational model of percutaneous fetoscopic endoluminal tracheal occlusion - baboons (Papio spp.). Fetal diagnosis and therapy 35, 92–100, https://doi.org/10.1159/000357139 (2014).
Buhimschi, C. S., Buhimschi, I. A., Malinow, A. M. & Weiner, C. P. Uterine contractility in women whose fetus is delivered in the occipitoposterior position. American journal of obstetrics and gynecology 188, 734–739 (2003).
Stoller, M. K. The obstetric pelvis and mechanism of labor in non-human primates PhD thesis, University of Chicago (1995).
Barrier, B. F., Joiner, L. L., Jimenez, J. B. & Leland, M. M. External cephalic version of the term breech baboon (Papio sp.) fetus. Journal of medical primatology 36, 148–150, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0684.2007.00201.x (2007).
Dunsworth, H. M., Warrener, A. G., Deacon, T., Ellison, P. T. & Pontzer, H. Metabolic hypothesis for human altriciality. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 109, 15212–15216, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1205282109 (2012).
Brocato, B. et al. Endocannabinoid crosstalk between placenta and maternal fat in a baboon model (Papio spp.) of obesity. Placenta 34, 983–989, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.placenta.2013.08.007 (2013).
McCance, R. A. & Widdowson, E. M. Fat. Pediatric research 11, 1081–1083 (1977).
Fantu, S., Segni, H. & Alemseged, F. Incidence, causes and outcome of obstructed labor in jimma university specialized hospital. Ethiopian journal of health sciences 20, 145–151 (2010).
Konje, J. C., Obisesan, K. A. & Ladipo, O. A. Obstructed labor in Ibadan. International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics 39, 17–21 (1992).
Trevathan, W. Primate pelvic anatomy and implications for birth. Philos. Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 370, 20140065, https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2014.0065 (2015).
Huseynov, A. et al. Developmental evidence for obstetric adaptation of the human female pelvis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 113, 5227–5232, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1517085113 (2016).
Rosenberg, K. & Trevathan, W. Birth, obstetrics and human evolution. BJOG: an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology 109, 1199–1206 (2002).
Mitteroecker, P., Huttegger, S. M., Fischer, B. & Pavlicev, M. Cliff-edge model of obstetric selection in humans. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 113, 14680–14685, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1612410113 (2016).
Wittman, A. B. & Wall, L. L. The evolutionary origins of obstructed labor: bipedalism, encephalization, and the human obstetric dilemma. Obstetrical & gynecological survey 62, 739–748, https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ogx.0000286584.04310.5c (2007).
Phillips-Conroy, J. E. & Rogers, J. A. Duration of the third stage of labor in a female yellow baboon from Mikumi National Park, Tanzania. Folia primatologica; international journal of primatology 45, 44–47 (1985).
Bauer, C. & Harrison, T. Retrospective Analysis of the Incidence of Retained Placenta in 3 Large Colonies of NHP. Comparative medicine 66, 143–149 (2016).
Kaelin Agten, A. et al. The clinical outcome of cesarean scar pregnancies implanted “on the scar” versus “in the niche”. American journal of obstetrics and gynecology 216, 510.e511–510.e516, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2017.01.019 (2017).
Jauniaux, E., Collins, S. L., Jurkovic, D. & Burton, G. J. Accreta placentation: a systematic review of prenatal ultrasound imaging and grading of villous invasiveness. American journal of obstetrics and gynecology 215, 712–721, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2016.07.044 (2016).
Silver, R. M. & Barbour, K. D. Placenta accreta spectrum: accreta, increta, and percreta. Obstetrics and gynecology clinics of North America 42, 381–402, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ogc.2015.01.014 (2015).
Mattson, J. A., Kuehl, T. J., Yandell, P. M., Pierce, L. M. & Coates, K. W. Evaluation of the aged female baboon as a model of pelvic organ prolapse and pelvic reconstructive surgery. American journal of obstetrics and gynecology 192, 1395–1398, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2004.12.046 (2005).
Wilson, P. M. Some observations on pelvic floor evolution in primates. South African medical journal = Suid-Afrikaanse tydskrif vir geneeskunde 47, 1203–1209 (1973).
Bommineni, Y. R., Dick, E. J. Jr., Malapati, A. R., Owston, M. A. & Hubbard, G. B. Natural pathology of the Baboon (Papio spp.). Journal of medical primatology 40, 142–155, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0684.2010.00463.x (2011).
Ebersole, J. L., Holt, S. C. & Cappelli, D. Periodontitis in pregnant baboons: systemic inflammation and adaptive immune responses and pregnancy outcomes in a baboon model. Journal of periodontal research 49, 226–236, https://doi.org/10.1111/jre.12099 (2014).
Acknowledgements
We acknowledge the help and dedication of the many excellent animal caretakers, technicians, and veterinarians of the Southwest National Primate Center. We would like to acknowledge the contribution of Miss Melissa Waggoner in manuscript editing and Mr. Elihu Arzate with images preparation. This investigation was supported by Southwest National Primate Research Center grant P51 RR013986 from the National Center for Research Resources and the National Institutes of Health, which are currently supported by the Office of Research Infrastructure Programs through P51 OD011133. This investigation was conducted in facilities constructed with support from the Office of Research Infrastructure Programs (ORIP) of the National Institutes of Health through grant numbers C06 RR015456 and C06 RR014578. The research was also supported by a New Investigator (UTHSCSA) grant, Southwest National Primate Center pilot grant, UTPB and TTUHSC start-ups to N.S-L., as well as NIH grant HD21350 to Dr. Peter Nathanielsz (UTHSCSA).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Each author’s contribution to this work is listed below. N. Schlabritz-Loutsevitch: Conceived and designed the manuscript, participated in the data collection, wrote the draft and approved the final version of the manuscript. J. Maher: Data analyses, manuscript writing, and approved the final version of the manuscript. R. Sullivan: Data collection, video-recording, and approved the final version of the manuscript. G. Mari: Data collection, ultrasound evaluation, and approved the final version of the manuscript. M. Schenone: Data collection, ultrasound evaluation, and approved the final version of the manuscript. H.L. Cohen: Data collection, manuscript writing, and approved the final version of the manuscript. R.A. Word: Design, data collection, manuscript writing, approved the final version of the manuscript. G.B. Hubbard: Design, data collection, manuscript writing, and approved the final version of the manuscript. E.J. Dick Jr.: Design, data collection, manuscript writing, and approved the final version of the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing Interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Schlabritz-Loutsevitch, N., Maher, J., Sullivan, R. et al. Parturition in baboons (PAPIO SPP.). Sci Rep 8, 1174 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-19221-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-19221-4
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.