Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • News & Views
  • Published:

BLADDER CANCER

Two methods of prediction signatures

Bladder cancer molecular subtypes are promising for predicting patient outcomes. In contrast to most reports to date that used unsupervised clustering methods, a new study has demonstrated the value of a tumour differentiation signature based on normal biological expression patterns characteristic of basal or differentiated urothelial cells.

Refers to Mo, Q. et al. Prognostic power of a tumour differentiation gene signature for bladder urothelial carcinomas. J. Natl Cancer Inst. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djx243 (2018)

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Signatures for bladder cancer molecular subtyping and prognostication.

References

  1. International Bladder Cancer Nomogram Consortium, Bochner, B. H., Kattan, M. W. & Vora, K. C. Postoperative nomogram predicting risk of recurrence after radical cystectomy for bladder cancer. J. Clin. Oncol. 24, 3967–3972 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Mo, Q. et al. Prognostic power of a tumor differentiation gene signature for bladder urothelial carcinomas. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djx243 (2018).

  3. Lerner, S. et al. Bladder cancer molecular taxonomy: summary from a consensus meeting. Bladder Cancer 2, 37–47 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Ho, P. L., Kurtova, A. & Chan, K. S. Normal and neoplastic urothelial stem cells: getting to the root of the problem. Nat. Rev. Urol. 9, 583–594 (2012).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Dancik, G. M., Owens, C. R., Iczkowski, K. A. & Theodorescu, D. A cell of origin gene signature indicates human bladder cancer has distinct cellular progenitors. Stem Cells 32, 974–982 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Hedegaard, J. et al. Comprehensive transcriptional analysis of early-stage urothelial carcinoma. Cancer Cell 30, 27–42 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Lal, S., McCart Reed, A. E., de Luca, X. M. & Simpson, P. T. Molecular signatures in breast cancer. Methods 131, 135–146 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Dancik, G. M. & Theodorescu, D. Robust prognostic gene expression signatures in bladder cancer and lung adenocarcinoma depend on cell cycle related genes. PLoS ONE 9, e85249 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Seiler, R. et al. Impact of molecular subtypes in muscle-invasive bladder cancer on predicting response and survival after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Eur. Urol. 72, 544–554 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. GenomeDx. GenomeDx launches decipher bladder cancer classifier following publication of study on development, validation of molecular subtyping in muscle-invasive bladder cancer patients. GenomeDx https://genomedx.com/press-releases/genomedx-launches-decipher-bladder-cancer-classifier-following-publication-study-development-validation-molecular-subtyping-muscle-invasive-bladder-cancer-patients/

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank G. M. Dancik and T. C. M. Zuiverloon for their helpful suggestions and review of this article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dan Theodorescu.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jones, R.T., Theodorescu, D. Two methods of prediction signatures. Nat Rev Urol 15, 340–342 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41585-018-0004-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41585-018-0004-2

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing