Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Comment
  • Published:

We need more-diverse biobanks to improve behavioural genetics

Nature Human Behaviour volume 8, pages 197–200 (2024)Cite this article

Subjects

Biobanks have emerged as valuable resources for studying behavioural and social genomics, but are not representative of global populations. Thus, current research findings do not generalize, and exacerbate knowledge and health inequalities. We call on researchers, publishers and funders to address barriers to biobank diversity.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Composition of biobank participants over time as compared to regional and global populations.
Fig. 2: Comparison of socioeconomic and exposure factors between participants of All of Us and the UK Biobank.

References

  1. Okbay, A. et al. Nat. Genet. 54, 437–449 (2022).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Hill, W. D. et al. Nat. Commun. 10, 5741 (2019).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Barcellos, S. H., Carvalho, L. S. & Turley, P. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 115, E9765–E9772 (2018).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. He, Y. et al. Diabetes Care 44, 935–943 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. He, Y. & Patel, C. J. Int. J. Epidemiol. 52, 633–640 (2023).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. He, Y. Supplementary Methods. figshare.com, https://doi.org/10.6084/M9.FIGSHARE.24073587 (2023).

  7. Martin, A. R. et al. Nat. Genet. 51, 584–591 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Gaziano, J. M. et al. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 70, 214–223 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Carey, D. J. et al. Genet. Med. 18, 906–913 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. The All of Us Research Program Investigators. N. Engl. J. Med. 381, 668–676 (2019).

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Zhou, W. et al. Cell Genomics 2, 100192 (2022).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Prictor, M., Teare, H. J. A. & Kaye, J. Front. Public Health 6, 253 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Rao, A. et al. Biopreserv. Biobank. 17, 129–138 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Odeh, H. et al. Biopreserv. Biobank. 13, 421–429 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health NHGRI under award number T32HG010464 (to Y.H.), and National Institute of Mental Health under award number K99/R00MH117229 (to A.R.M.).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Program in Medical and Population Genetics, Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA

    Yixuan He & Alicia R. Martin

  2. Stanley Center for Psychiatric Research, Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA

    Yixuan He & Alicia R. Martin

  3. Analytic and Translational Genetics Unit, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA

    Yixuan He & Alicia R. Martin

Authors
  1. Yixuan He
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Alicia R. Martin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alicia R. Martin.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

He, Y., Martin, A.R. We need more-diverse biobanks to improve behavioural genetics. Nat Hum Behav 8, 197–200 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-023-01795-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-023-01795-3

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing