Correction to: Nature Communications https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-46743-5, published online 16 March 2024

The original version of this Article contained an error in Fig. 2, in which the intended panel 2c was replaced with the data in panel 2e. The correct and peer-reviewed version of Fig. 2 is:

which replaces the previous incorrect version:

This has been corrected in both the PDF and HTML versions of the Article.