Lactylation of METTL16 promotes cuproptosis via m6A-modification on FDX1 mRNA in gastric cancer

Sun, Lianhui; Zhang, Yuan; Yang, Boyu; Sun, Sijun; Zhang, Pengshan; Luo, Zai; Feng, Tingting; Cui, Zelin; Zhu, Ting; Li, Yuming; Qiu, Zhengjun; Fan, Guangjian; Huang, Chen

doi:10.1038/s41467-023-42025-8

Download PDF

Article
Open access
Published: 20 October 2023

Lactylation of METTL16 promotes cuproptosis via m⁶A-modification on FDX1 mRNA in gastric cancer

Lianhui Sun^1,2^na1,
Yuan Zhang ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0001-9284-9404¹^na1,
Boyu Yang³^na1,
Sijun Sun¹^na1,
Pengshan Zhang¹,
Zai Luo¹,
Tingting Feng⁴,
Zelin Cui ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-2700-5800⁵,
Ting Zhu²,
Yuming Li⁶,
Zhengjun Qiu¹,
Guangjian Fan ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0003-0684-1380² &
…
Chen Huang ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0003-0404-461X¹

Nature Communications volume 14, Article number: 6523 (2023) Cite this article

11k Accesses
14 Citations
2 Altmetric
Metrics details

Subjects

Abstract

Cuproptosis, caused by excessively high copper concentrations, is urgently exploited as a potential cancer therapeutic. However, the mechanisms underlying the initiation, propagation, and ultimate execution of cuproptosis in tumors remain unknown. Here, we show that copper content is significantly elevated in gastric cancer (GC), especially in malignant tumors. Screening reveals that METTL16, an atypical methyltransferase, is a critical mediator of cuproptosis through the m⁶A modification on FDX1 mRNA. Furthermore, copper stress promotes METTL16 lactylation at site K229 followed by cuproptosis. The process of METTL16 lactylation is inhibited by SIRT2. Elevated METTL16 lactylation significantly improves the therapeutic efficacy of the copper ionophore– elesclomol. Combining elesclomol with AGK2, a SIRT2-specific inhibitor, induce cuproptosis in gastric tumors in vitro and in vivo. These results reveal the significance of non-histone protein METTL16 lactylation on cuproptosis in tumors. Given the high copper and lactate concentrations in GC, cuproptosis induction becomes a promising therapeutic strategy for GC.

Ferroptosis: molecular mechanisms and health implications

Article Open access 02 December 2020

Ferroptosis: past, present and future

Article Open access 03 February 2020

Cancer-associated fibroblast-derived acetate promotes pancreatic cancer development by altering polyamine metabolism via the ACSS2–SP1–SAT1 axis

Article Open access 01 March 2024

Introduction

Copper, an essential trace element in organisms, is involved in cell growth and metabolism^1,2,3,4,5,6. Copper homeostasis disorder is relevant to various tumors, such as gynecological tumors^7,8 and colorectal cancer⁹. Indeed, increased serum copper levels in cancer patients are correlated with cancer grade and chemotherapy resistance¹⁰. Copper becomes toxic if its concentration exceeds a certain threshold, inducing a newly discovered form of cell death, named cuproptosis¹¹. Cuproptosis occurs when copper binds directly to lipoylated components of the tricarboxylic acid cycle, leading to subsequent loss of iron-sulfur cluster-containing proteins, proteotoxic stress and ultimately cell death. A recent study using genome-wide CRISPR-Cas9 loss-of-function screening identified ten critical factors of cuproptosis¹¹. Among them, ferredoxin 1 (FDX1) encodes a reductase known to reduce Cu²⁺ to its more toxic form Cu¹⁺, lipoylates dihydrolipoamide S-acetyltransferase (DLAT) that is essential for cuproptosis¹², and is the direct target of elesclomol that is an important copper ionophore¹³. However, the mechanisms underlying the initiation, propagation, and execution of cuproptosis in tumors remain unknown.

RNA modification, as an epigenetic regulator, has gained increasing attention in recent years¹⁴. N6-methyladenosine (m⁶A), the most abundant RNA modification in eukaryotic cells, plays a crucial role in tumorigenesis^15,16. The expression of regulatory proteins associated with m⁶A is abnormal in most tumors, leading to drug resistance and tumor development^17,18. METTL16, followed by classic METTL3/METTL14 methyltransferases^19,20, was recently identified as a second m⁶A writer²¹. Previous studies have demonstrated that METTL16 is responsible for m⁶A deposition in many transcripts, including the MAT2A transcript that encodes SAM synthetase²² and U6 snRNA²³. METTL16 shows tumorigenesis and tumor-promoting capabilities in an m⁶A-dependent manner in multiple tumors^{24,25,26,27,28,29}, while the regulatory mechanisms controlling METTL16 activity remain unclear. A comprehensive study about the regulation and function of METTL16 may therefore provide better insights into the prevention of tumor therapy and metastasis.

Recently, lactate-derived lactylation has been identified as a newly discovered post-translational modification (PTM)³⁰. Lactate is taken up by tumor cells and transported to mitochondria for oxidation to provide energy³¹, meanwhile derives lactylation of histone lysine (K) residue to stimulate gene transcription³⁰. Histone lactylated modification has been proven to involve multiple pathological processes, such as macrophage polarization^30,32 and tumorigenesis³³. Delactylases and lactyltransferases are also gradually being discovered. Delactylases mainly include SIRT1-3 and HDAC1-3^34,35,36 while lactyltransferases mainly include P300, MOF, ME-PCT, and RE-PCT^30,36,37 The abundance and specificity of non-histone proteins in cells yet were higher than that of histones. Whether there are numerous lactylated modifications on non-histone proteins and how these lactylated non-histone proteins operate and are regulated in tumor progression are urgently needed to be explored³⁸.

In this study, we found that copper content is significantly elevated in gastric cancer (GC), especially in malignant tumor types. Screening revealed that METTL16 is a critical mediator of cuproptosis in GC through the m⁶A modification on FDX1 mRNA. Interestingly, we found that high copper content promotes non-histone protein METTL16-K229 lactylation through increasing the interaction of potential lactyltransferases AARS1 / AARS2 to METTL16, and ultimately leads to cuproptosis. In addition, delactylases SIRT2 inhibits the process of METTL16 lactylation. Given that gastric tumors (especially malignant tumor types) have higher copper and lactate concentrations than normal tissues, combined treatment with copper ionophore– elesclomol and SIRT2-specific inhibitors to trigger cuproptosis obviously improves the efficacy of gastric cancer treatment. The study findings provide insights into the mechanisms underlying the initiation and execution of cuproptosis and suggest a promising therapeutic strategy for GC.

Results

Copper content is high in gastric cancer and related to tumor progression

Cuproptosis is caused by excessively high copper concentration, but the regulatory mechanisms of cuproptosis in tumors still need to be explored¹¹. Given copper is mainly absorbed through the stomach and upper small intestine, tumors of the gastrointestinal system are suitable for studying the initiation and propagation of cuproptosis. We analyzed copper concentrations in 48 pairs of GC tissues and adjacent tissues, finding higher copper concentrations in GC tissues than in normal gastric tissues (Fig. 1a, P < 0.01). Further analysis revealed that the relative copper content in patients with stage III GC was higher than that in patients with stage I and II GC (Fig. 1b, P < 0.05), indicating that copper content is correlated with tumor progression. Additionally, the copper content was negatively correlated with the overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) in patients with GC (Fig. 1c, d; log-rank P < 0.05). Meanwhile, the copper content was positively correlated with Ki-67 expression, an indicator of cell proliferation (Fig. 1e). Similarly, the copper content was positively correlated with platelet/lymphocyte and neutrophil/lymphocyte ratios in serum specimens of patients, both of which are inflammation-related prognostic biomarkers for invasive malignancy for GC (Fig. 1f, g). These results indicated that the high content of copper is involved in the progression and development of GC.

Additionally, we examined the differences of copper concentrations in different GC types, especially in malignant tumor types. Intriguingly, we discovered higher copper concentrations in mucinous adenocarcinomas than in overall gastric tumors (Fig. 1h). The copper content was positively correlated with invasive indicators such as lymph node metastasis (Fig. 1i) and vascular invasion (Fig. 1j) in mucinous adenocarcinomas. However, the copper content was not significantly associated with these invasive indicators or tumor differentiation in non-mucinous adenocarcinoma (Supplementary Fig. 1a–h). Mucinous adenocarcinoma, a rare histological subtype of GC, is associated with a more advanced stage and worse 5-year OS and DFS than non-mucinous adenocarcinoma³⁹. As a refractory GC, mucinous adenocarcinoma is characterized by chemoradiotherapy resistance and more effective therapeutic approaches are urgently needed.

Recently, researchers have found that high intracellular copper concentration triggers a reductase FDX1 to reduce Cu²⁺ to a more toxic form Cu¹⁺, leading to cuproptosis¹¹. We found that FDX1 protein level was higher in GC compared to normal gastric tissues (Fig. 1k). Given both FDX1 protein level and copper content are high in GC, cuproptosis may be more easily triggered. It provides a potential therapeutic strategy for GC, especially for malignant tumors—mucinous adenocarcinomas.

METTL16 is a critical mediator of cuproptosis

It has been reported that total m⁶A levels were significantly increased in GC groups compared with benign gastric disease and healthy control patients⁴⁰, and promoted the process of GC tumorigenesis, growth, invasion, epithelial mesenchymal transformation (EMT), metastasis, and even multidrug resistance^{41,42,43,44,45,46}. In addition, m⁶A modification is involved in several cell death types, including apoptosis, necroptosis, ferroptosis and pyroptosis⁴⁷. However, the relationship of m⁶A modification and cuproptosis remains elusive. Interestingly, we found that copper content was positive correlated with total m⁶A levels in GC tissues (R = 0.5116) (Fig. 2a). Furthermore, copper significantly upregulated total levels of m⁶A modification in GC cells (Fig. 2b). Given that the methyltransferase-like proteins (METTL) family plays a dominant role in promoting m⁶A modifications⁴⁸, we analyzed the viability of METTLs knockdown cells when treated with elesclomol/ disulfiram and copper in a 1:1 ratio. The results indicated that METTL16 knockdown led to resistance to elesclomol/ disulfiram-Cu treatment (Fig. 2c–e). Moreover, treatment with tetrathiomolybdate (TTM), a cuproptosis inhibitor, suppressed cuproptosis in control and METTL16-knockdown cells, indicating that METTL16 is involved in cuproptosis (Fig. 2f). To further verify these results, METTL16-knockout clone cell lines were successfully constructed and validated (Supplementary Fig. 2c) with similar results observed as in METTL16-knockdown cells (Fig. 2g, h). These results demonstrated that METTL16 plays a crucial role in cuproptosis.

METTL16 is an m⁶A methyltransferase that modifies several pre- and non-coding RNAs, promotes translation and carcinogenesis, and is an important potential target for cancer treatment^21,29. The mRNA levels of METTL16 were relatively higher in GC than in peri-tumors through TCGA and GTEx databases (Supplementary Fig. 2d and 2e). METTL16 protein levels were also significantly higher in GC tissues than in normal gastric tissues according to the immunohistochemical (IHC) scores (Supplementary Fig. 2f). METTL16 protein levels had no relevance with TNM staging, pathological patterns, nerve invasion, or vascular invasion (Supplementary Fig. 2g–2j). Interestingly, we found that the OS and DFS of gastric cancer patients with high METTL16 protein level was significantly increased (Supplementary Fig. 2k and 2l), which were consistent with those previously reported by Zhang et al.⁴⁹, implying that high METTL16 protein level has potential toxic effects on tumors.

METTL16 promotes cuproptosis by targeting FDX1

METTL16 is responsible for m⁶A deposition in many transcripts⁵⁰. Hence, methylated RNA immunoprecipitation (MeRIP) sequencing was performed in stable Ctrl-Sh and METTL16-Sh cell lines (Fig. 3a). The metagene plot showed that m⁶A abundance reduced in METTL16-Sh cells (Supplementary Fig. 3a). The potential m⁶A modifications in each sample were predicted using HOMER software and m⁶A modifications mapped primarily to the classical GGAC motif (Fig. 3b). We further analyzed the total m⁶A distribution patterns of mRNAs according to the MeRIP-seq results and found that m⁶A peaks were mainly enriched in CDS and 3’UTR regions (Supplementary Fig. 3b). KEGG pathway analysis indicated that genes methylated by METTL16 were mainly associated with cancer pathways (Supplementary Fig. 3c). GO enrichment analysis showed top 15 pathways enriched by METTL16-modified genes, some of which were correlated with mitochondrial pathways (Fig. 3c). Furthermore, we identified 10 typical factors from cuproptosis-related pathway that were related to low m⁶A methylation levels as well as downregulated mRNA levels in METTL16-Sh group (Fig. 3d and Supplementary Data 1). qPCR analysis showed that the mRNA levels of FDX1, MTF1, PDHB, ATP7A, and DLD were decreased in METTL16-sh cells. FDX1 exhibited the most significantly decreased mRNA level in METTL16-sh cells versus the control cells (Fig. 3e and Supplementary Fig. 3d). Furthermore, the significant decreased protein level of FDX1 was detected in METTL16-Sh or -KO cells (Fig. 3f, g). Considering that FDX1 is the key regulators of copper ionophore–induced cell death, we presumed that METTL16 induced cuproptosis is FDX1-dependent.

Next, we evaluated whether METTL16 regulated cuproptosis by affecting the expression of FDX1. Given that protein lipoylation are the key element of cuproptosis¹¹, we assessed whether METTL16 knockdown affected protein lipoylation using a lipoic acid-specific antibody as a measure of DLAT lipoylation. The result showed that METTL16 knockdown resulted in reduced DLAT lipoylation, as measured by immunoblotting (Fig. 3h). Moreover, FDX1 overexpression reversed the antagonistic effect of cuproptosis in METTL16 knockdown and knockout cell lines after elesclomol/ disulfiram-Cu treatment (Fig. 3i, j). Cuproptosis induced by METTL16-overexpression were inhibited by FDX1 knockdown (Fig. 3k). Collectively, these data suggested that METTL16 promotes cuproptosis by targeting FDX1.

METTL16 promotes FDX1 accumulation via m⁶A modification on FDX1 mRNA

To further explore how METTL16 regulated m⁶A modification and thus influenced FDX1 mRNA levels, gene-specific MeRIP-qPCR assays were performed. We found that the m⁶A levels on FDX1 mRNA is significantly decreased in METTL16 knockdown and knockout cells, and significantly increased in cells transfected with METTL16-overexpression plasmid (Fig. 4a, b). The decay rate of FDX1 mRNA was faster in METTL16-knockdown cells than in control cells when transcription was halted with actinomycin D (ActD) (Fig. 4c). It has been reported that METTL16 locates in cytoplasm to promote mRNA translation, and locates in the nucleus to deposit m⁶A into specific RNA targets²⁹. Endogenous METTL16 located in the nucleus in GC tumor cells (Supplementary Fig. 3e). These results indicated that METTL16-mediated methylation led to FDX1 mRNA stability. Integrative genomics viewer (IGV) analysis of enriched m⁶A peaks of FDX1 showed a decreased m⁶A level in METTL16-sh cells (green peak) compared with control cells (red peak), indicating that METTL16 may promote m⁶A modification of FDX1 in the CDS or 3’UTR regions (Fig. 4d). Therefore, part of CDS (selected region:110456920-110457047, and 110462353-110462468) as well as 3’UTR regions (selected region: 110462469-110464884) of FDX1 were fused into the downstream of pGL3 luciferase reporter for constructing FDX1-WT luciferase reporter. With co-transfection of FDX1 luciferase reporter and different doses of METTL16-OE plasmids, we found that METTL16 significantly promoted the FDX1-luciferase activity (Fig. 4e).

To explore it furtherly, we predicted the possible m⁶A modification sites on FDX1 mRNA using SRAMP, a sequence-based m⁶A modification site predictor. Integrating the prediction results and data in Fig. 4e, we identified two potential m⁶A modification sites with very high confidence: site 602 A in the CDS region and site 820 A in the UTR region of the FDX1 transcript (Fig. 4f, g). The following MeRIP-qPCR analysis with specific primers proved that the 602 site on FDX1 transcripts is the direct substrate of METTL16-mediated methylation (Fig. 4h). Additionally, we designed and constructed FDX1-602-Mut and FDX1-820-Mut luciferase reporters by replacing the specific adenosine (A) in m⁶A motif with thymine (T) based on FDX1-WT luciferase reporter (Fig. 4g). The results of the dual-luciferase assay indicated that METTL16 could not promote the luciferase activity of the reporter construct bearing FDX1-CDS/UTR with mutations at site 602 (Fig. 4i). Analysis of METTL16 and FDX1 expression in GEPIA database suggested that METTL16 and FDX1 were positively correlated in GC (Fig. 4j). In addition, immunohistochemical staining demonstrated that the expression of METTL16 was positively correlated with that of FDX1 in a tissue microarray containing 54 pairs of GC and adjacent normal tissues (Fig. 4k). Together, these results confirmed that METTL16-mediated m⁶A modification on FDX1 mRNA is critical for FDX1 mRNA stability.

METTL16 is lactylated at K229 under copper stress

Next, we evaluated whether METTL16 responded to copper stress in GC. Upon copper treatment, METTL16 mRNA and protein levels were unchanged but FDX1 protein levels were increased dramatically (Fig. 5a, b). To verify whether upregulation of FDX1 expression was METTL16-dependent under copper stress, we measured FDX1 protein expression in METTL16-knockdown or -knockout cells in the presence or absence of copper. The results showed that METTL16 deficiency abolished the copper-induced upregulation of FDX1 (Fig. 5c, d). Since METTL16 mRNA and protein levels were unchanged under copper stress, we then measured changes in PTM of METTL16 using mass spectrometry. The analysis revealed eleven lactylation and two acetylation sites on METTL16 protein sequence (Fig. 5e). PTM levels of the six lactylation (Red) sites were significantly increased after lactate treatment, implying that these six sites could be regulated in tumor cells. We then confirmed the presence of a lactylation or acetylation response to copper stress. The results showed that copper treatment markedly increased lactylation rather than acetylation level of METTL16 (Fig. 5f). To identify the important lactylation site of METTL16 in copper-related metabolism, lactylation-defective mutants (K to R) of these six lactylation sites and K410 (as a representative site, of which the lactylation was unchanged under lactate stress) were generated. We found that only the METTL16-K229R mutant showed reduced lactylation under copper stress (Fig. 5g). Subsequently, b-y ion matching diagram of METTL16-K229 and other lactylation sites were showed by LC-MS/MS analysis in Fig. 5e (Fig. 5h, Supplementary Fig. 4). To further confirm METTL16-K229 lactylation under copper stress, a METTL16 lacty-K229 antibody was generated, and its effectiveness and specificity were verified using the lacty-K229 peptide and cells expressing METTL16-WT, -K229R, or -K229E (Fig. 5i, j). Both copper and lactate treatments induced strong METTL16 lactylation at K229 (Fig. 5k, l), indicating that K229 is an essential lactylation site in copper-related metabolism. These results indicated that METTL16 is lactylated at K229 under copper stress.

Then, we analyzed potential impact of K229 lactylation on METTL16. Firstly, METTL16-K229 lactylation didn’t affect the nuclear location of METTL16 (Supplementary Fig. 5a). Crystal structure of METTL16 complexed with MAT2A RNA hairpin (PDB 6DU5), showed that K229 formed a salt bridge with E226 and K163 from the autoinhibition loop (pink) was inserted in the SAM binding site of METTL16 (Supplementary Fig. 5b). Our structure modelling indicated that R230 could stabilize the autoinhibited state by forming hydrogen bonds with K163 or Q162 of the loop. Lactylation of K229 will abolish its salt bridge with E226, which may lead to conformational changes in sidechains of E226 and allow the formation of salt bridge with R230 (Supplementary Fig. 5c). This would weaken the stability of the autoinhibited state leading to elevated enzymatic activity of METTL16. Then, the downstream targets of METTL16, such as BCAT1, BCAT2, and GPX4⁵¹ were selected to verified the effect of METTL16-K229 lactylation on the its methyltransferase activity. The result showed that METTL16-K229E promoted the methyltransferase activity (Supplementary Fig. 5d). FDX1 protein levels were further ensured in stable METTL16-rescued (METTL16-WT, -K229R, or -K229E) cell lines, in which endogenous METTL16 was replaced by wild-type (WT), lactylation-deficient (K229R), or lactylation-mimetic (K229E). The result showed that FDX1 protein levels were decreased in METTL16-knockdown cells and recovered after METTL16-WT or -K229E rescued cells, but not METTL16-K229R rescued cells (Fig. 5m). Together, METTL16-K229 lactylation is induced by copper stress and promotes the methyltransferase activity of METTL16.

SIRT2 delactylates METTL16-K229 and inhibits the activity of METTL16

The above data confirmed that copper activated the lactylation of METTL16-K229, but the specific delactylases and lactyltransferases involved in tumor cells remained unclear. Theoretically, the higher the lactate content, the more lactic acid is available, increasing the lactylation of proteins. Thus, we examined the intracellular lactate in copper-treated GC cells using the lactic acid content detection kit and found no significant difference after copper treatment (Supplementary Fig. 6a). Then, we investigated whether copper mediated the regulation of lactyltransferases or delactylases on METTL16. The LC-MS/MS assay to identify the binding proteins of METTL16 was performed (Supplementary Data 2). Identified as a binding protein of METTL16, SIRT2 is a typical deacetylation enzyme⁵² classified in the major delactylase and lactyltransferase groups (Fig. 6a). EIF3b was also identified as a binding protein of METTL16, consistently with previous research²⁹. To investigate and verify the interaction between METTL16 and SIRT2, METTL16-SIRT2 binding was detected in HGC-27 cells (Fig. 6b). The direct METTL16-SIRT2 association was verified using a His-pull-down assay (Fig. 6c). METTL16-K229 lactylation was markedly inhibited by SIRT2 overexpression (Fig. 6d), and promoted by SIRT2 knockdown or treatment with the SIRT2 inhibitor- AGK2 (Fig. 6e). Moreover, copper-induced lactylation of METTL16-K229 was inhibited by SIRT2 overexpression, whereas increased by SIRT2 knockdown or AGK2 treatment (Fig. 6f, g). Collectively, these results indicated that SIRT2 interacts with and delactylates METTL16 at site K229.

We further explored the regulation of METTL16 by SIRT2 in stable METTL16-rescued (METTL16-WT, -K229R, or -K229E) cell lines. SIRT2 overexpression inhibited FDX1 m⁶A levels in METTL16-WT cells but not in METTL16-K229R or -K229E cells, indicating that SIRT2 inhibited METTL16 activity through METTL16-K229 lactylation (Fig. 6h, i). Furthermore, SIRT2 overexpression suppressed FDX1 protein levels (Fig. 6j), whereas SIRT2 knockdown and AGK2 treatment promoted FDX1 protein levels (Fig. 6k). The results of immunofluorescence staining (IF) demonstrated that the SIRT2 protein levels were negatively correlated with FDX1 protein levels in the GC tissue microarray (Fig. 6l). In addition, SIRT2, as a deacetylation enzyme, may also regulated METTL16 deacetylation. We found that total METTL16 acetylation had a partial reduction after SIRT2 overexpression (Supplementary Fig. 6b). To examine whether SIRT2-mediated METTL16 deacetylation affects the methyltransferase activity of METTL16, cells with METTL16-Sh rescue of METTL16-WT, -K171R, -K171Q, -K348R, and -K348Q were generated and performed to detect m⁶A level. The results showed that acetylation sites had no effects on methyltransferase activity of METTL16 (Supplementary Fig. 6c and 6d). Moreover, there is no significant difference on increased mRNA level of FDX1 after METTL16-WT, -K171R, -K171Q, -K348R, and -K348Q overexpression (Supplementary Fig. 6e, 6f). These data indicated that SIRT2-mediated METTL16 deacetylation did not affect the FDX1 mRNA levels. There was no difference in METTL16 expression with or without SIRT2-knockdown or AGK2-treatment (Supplementary Fig. 6g and 6h). Taken together, these results indicated that SIRT2 negatively regulates METTL16 activity through delactylation at K229.

To further explore the regulation of SIRT2 on METTL16 under copper, we detected whether copper influences the interaction of SIRT2 and METTL16. Unexpectedly, the results showed that copper treatment slightly reduces the binding of SIRT2 and METTL16 (Supplementary Fig. 6i). Given that the lactylation of METTL16 increased under copper treatment, we have reasons to speculate that copper treatment is likely to enhance the binding of METTL16 and lactyltransferases. Therefore, ten potential lactyltransferases were selected, which has been reported or predicted, and were knockdown with specific siRNAs. These are as followed: KAT3B (EP300), CREBBP (CBP), ACSS2, AARS1, AARS2, KAT6A (MOZ), KAT8 (MOF), KAT5, NMT1, and NMT2. The results showed that just AARS1-Si and AARS2-Si decreased METTL16-K229 lactylation under copper treatment (Supplementary Fig. 7a). Furthermore, copper promotes the interaction of AARS1 or AARS2 with METTL16 significantly (Supplementary Fig. 7b). Overexpression of AARS1 or AARS2 promotes the lactylation of METTL16-K229 indeed after copper treatment (Supplementary Fig. 7c). Moreover, in vitro lactylation assay showed that AARS1/2 upregulates lactylation of METTL16-WT other than METTL16-K229R dramatically (Supplementary Fig. 7d and 7e). Moreover, synthesized unmodified peptide around K229 of METTL16 was lactylated at K229 by AARS1 or AARS2 (Supplementary Fig. 7f). These results indicated that AARS1 and AARS2 maybe lactyltransferases of METTL16. The promotion of METTL16 lactylation by copper could be due to the increased interaction between AARS1 or AARS2 with METTL16.

SIRT2–METTL16–FDX1–cuproptosis axis support a promising therapeutic strategy

FDX1 is an essential mediator of cuproptosis, which is a potential treatment for cancer⁵³. We showed that FDX1 protein level was increased after SIRT2-inhibition or copper-induced METTL16-K229 lactylation. Next, we examined the effect of METTL16-K229 lactylation on cuproptosis. The results showed that the decreased DLAT lipoylation mediated by METTL16 knockdown under copper stress was rescued in METTL16-WT/-K229E cells, but not in METTL16-K229R cells (Fig. 7a). Additionally, elesclomol treatment in the presence of copper induced cuproptosis in METTL16-WT or -K229E cells, but not in METTL16-K229R cells (Fig. 7b). Moreover, SIRT2-overexpression reversed the increase of DLAT lipoylation induced by METTL16-WT under copper stress, but not that induced by METT16-K229E, indicating that SIRT2 inhibited cuproptosis through delactylating METTL16-K229 (Fig. 7c). Consistently, AGK2 treatment promoted DLAT lipoylation in METTL16-WT cells, but not in METTL16-K229R cells under copper stress (Fig. 7d). In addition, AGK2 treatment promoted cuproptosis in the presence of elesclomol and copper (Fig. 7e).

We further evaluated whether METTL16 lactylation can enhance the therapeutic response of xenograft tumors in mice receiving elesclomol treatment. METTL16-WT, -K229R, -K229E cells were subcutaneously injected into nude mice above their left and right hind legs. Tumor growth was markedly inhibited in mice receiving elesclomol treatment in the METTL16-WT and -K229E groups but not in the METTL16-K229R group, as observed by a reduction in tumor volume and weight (Fig. 7f–h).

The FDX1 staining in tumor sections showed higher in METTL16-WT and -K229E groups than METTL16-K229R group in tumor xenografts (Fig. 7i). These results demonstrated that the lactylation status of METTL16 at K229 played a crucial role in determining cuproptosis. Additionally, combined treatment of elesclomol and AGK2 were used in tumor xenografts. Analysis of tumor sections showed that AGK2 sensitized elesclomol treatment in vivo, as observed by a reduction of tumor volume and weight (Fig. 7j–l). These results demonstrated that the combination of elesclomol and AGK2 is promising therapy in gastric cancer, especially in malignant tumors—mucinous adenocarcinomas (higher copper content).

Discussion

Altered copper homeostasis can promote tumor growth, invasiveness, or even confer chemotherapy resistance. However, excessively intracellular copper accumulation leads to a unique type of cell death termed cuproptosis¹¹. In this study, we found that copper content is significantly higher in gastric cancer than in normal gastric tissues. Moreover, high copper content is positively related with the TNM staging and worse OS and DFS of GC patients, especially in mucinous adenocarcinomas that are difficult to treated with a more advanced stage and worse OS and DFS than non-mucinous adenocarcinoma³⁹. Hence, how to utilize high content of copper in malignant tumors, such as mucinous adenocarcinomas to trigger cuproptosis will be developed as a promising strategy for cancer therapy, and which is worth further investigation. Furthermore, we demonstrated that the combination of elesclomol and SIRT2 inhibitor AGK2 is a promising therapeutic strategy, and tackles the research bottleneck of cuproptosis on tumor therapy. Given that there is no typical cell line for mucinous adenocarcinoma to validate the effectiveness of cuproptosis on cancer therapy, patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models of mucinous adenocarcinomas are constructing and will be used in our future work.

Cuproptosis induced by copper overload is a specific cell death pathway that differs from apoptosis, pyroptosis, and necroptosis¹¹. How the essential proteins of cuproptosis were activated, modified, and operated in the disruption of copper homeostasis remains unclear⁵⁴. In this study, we found that FDX1, responsible for reducing Cu²⁺ to a more toxic form Cu¹⁺, is dramatically increased under high level copper circumstances. Further research revealed that high copper content promotes METTL16-K229 lactylation, and then lactylated METTL16 upregulates FDX1 mRNA and protein levels via m⁶A-modification on FDX1 mRNA, which ultimately induces DLAT lipolylation and cuproptosis in GC. Consequently, clinical data from GC tissue microarray proved the correlation between METTL16 and FDX1. The copper–lactylated METTL16–FDX1–cuproptosis axis is a key regulatory process in copper-related metabolism, and fills the gap in cuproptosis manipulation.

Abnormal glycolipid metabolism is an typical characteristics of tumors, and tumor cells produce large amounts of lactate through glycolysis even under aerobic conditions⁵⁵. Lactate is taken up by tumor cells and transported to mitochondria for oxidation to provide energy³¹, while acting as a form of PTM to regulate histone lactylated modifications³⁰. Histone lactylated modification is involved in multiple pathological processes^30,32,33. Whether there are numerous lactylated modifications on non-histone proteins in tumor progress remain unclear³⁸. In this study, we found that non-histone protein METTL16 was lactylated at site K229 under copper stress screening from six lactylation sites that were identified by LC-MS/MS analysis. METTL16-K229 lactylation accelerated its role in DLAT lipoylation and cuproptosis via m⁶A-modification on FDX1 mRNA. Moreover, delactylase SIRT2, identified as a binding protein of METTL16 by LC-MS/MS, could reduce METTL16-K229 lactylation, and inhibited the function of METTL16 on cuproptosis. These results revealed a positive feedback loop in which high lactate levels produced by glycolysis promote METTL16 lactylation, which in turn regulates the lipoylation of TCA-related proteins, consequently inducing cuproptosis in the presence of high concentrations of copper in tumor cells. The lactylation of non-histone protein METTL16 is significant to understand the regulatory mechanism between glucose- and copper-related metabolisms in tumors.

Lactate functions as interlinkage between glycolysis and oxidative phosphorylation⁵⁶. Whatever in aerobic or anaerobic conditions, high level of glycolysis is present in almost all tumor types comparing to normal tissues⁵⁷. As a result, lactate was produced, thus providing sufficient substrate for the lactylation of proteins. In addition, lactate can be used to support oxidative phosphorylation⁵⁶. Interestingly, oxidative phosphorylation is upregulated in certain cancers, including leukemias, lymphomas, pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, and endometrial carcinoma, and can occur even in the face of active glycolysis⁵⁸. The decreases in mtDNA content have been observed in gastric cancers, showing reduced oxidative capacity⁵⁹. MSI/MSS sig-high gastric cancer is characterized by oxidative phosphorylation⁶⁰. This suggests that some gastric cancers with high level of oxidative phosphorylation may be suitable to be treated through cuproptosis.

There are mainly two sets of m⁶A RNA methyltransferases with verified mRNA targets in humans: METTL3/14/WTAP complex and METTL16. Although identified targets of METTL16 are limited until now, the roles of METTL16 as a potential target in many pathologic processes are emerging. There is a large similarity in protein structures between these two enzymes⁶¹, but some differences still exist, suggesting that they have unique responsibilities in cells. In our study, we found that METTL16 was significantly elevated in gastric cancer tissues, while METTL3 and METTL14 had no significant difference (Supplementary Fig. 2a). Further study showed that METTL16 is the methyltransferase of FDX1 by regulating the stability of FDX1 mRNA. In addition, we also analyzed the mRNA level of FDX1 is unchanged in METTL3 or METTL14 knockdown cells (Supplementary Fig. 2b). The above results prove that METTL16 mediated m⁶A modification is the key m⁶A modification for FDX1 stability.

Given that there is no direct evidence indicating that AARS1/2 is a lactyltransferase, we compared the lactylation modification group with other known aminoacylation modification groups and found that the lactylation modification group has a similar modification structure to the modification structure of the alanine modification group. Therefore, we speculate that AARS1 and AARS2, which have been shown to promote alanine modification, may also have a role in promoting lactylation modification^62,63,64. Our study showed that AARS1/2 directly regulate the lactylation modification of METTL16, suggesting that AARS1/2 maybe lactyltransferase for METTL16. In addition, we analyzed the protein structure of AARS1/2 and found that both have metal sulfur cluster binding sites in their amino acid sequences. Therefore, we showed that when cells are exposed to copper ions, copper ions may bind to the metal sulfur cluster binding region of AARS1/2 protein, causing a conformational change in AARS1/2 protein, enhancing its binding to METTL16, and thereby leading to the enhanced lactylation of METTL16. However, how AARS1/2 function as lactyltransferases and whether there are other factors involved in supporting or regulating enzymatic activities of AARS1/2 remain to be further explored.

Collectively, these results indicate that METTL16 acts as a driving force for cuproptosis. The lactylation of METTL16 at K229 upregulates FDX1 protein expression via m⁶A modification on FDX1 mRNA and serves as a pathway for triggering cuproptosis under copper stress. Additionally, the study findings demonstrate that METTL16 is a central hub in coordinating glucose and copper metabolism in GC. Moreover, the results indicate that METTL16 lactylation provide a potential target for evaluating the effectiveness of copper ionophore drugs. Given that gastric tumors (especially malignant tumor types) have higher copper and lactate concentrations than normal tissues, treatment with copper ionophores to bind copper ions and SIRT2-specific inhibitor may serve as a feasible and available strategy for gastric cancer therapy.

Methods

Cells and culturing conditions

AGS, HGC-27, or 293T cells (Culture Collection of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, China) were cultured in Roswell Park Memorial Institute (RPMI) 1640 medium (Bioagrio) or Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM) medium supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS, Bioagrio) and 1% penicillin and streptomycin (NCM Biotech). AGS and HGC-27 cells were subjected to cell-line authentication. All cell lines were cultured in a humidified incubator at 37 °C under at an atmosphere containing 5% CO₂. Cells were treated with different concentrations of elesclomol, disulfiram, and TTM (MCE, USA) for in vitro researches.

Tissue specimens and patient information

Three paired groups of GC and adjacent normal tissues were used in the present study. The first group included 48 pairs of fresh-frozen GC and adjacent normal tissue samples obtained from patients who underwent gastrectomy at Shanghai General Hospital (Shanghai, China) between October 2016 and May 2021. All samples were transferred to liquid nitrogen and stored at −80 °C until protein extraction. The second group included 57 pairs of GC and adjacent normal tissues obtained between 2013 and 2014 from Shanghai General Hospital⁶². The samples were fixed with formalin soon after surgery and embedded in paraffin to construct a tissue microarray (TMA). Three samples were lost due to producing an error, and thus we subsequently only had 54 pairs of samples. The third group included 44 plasma samples obtained from patients who underwent gastrectomy at Shanghai General Hospital (Shanghai, China) between December 2015 and October 2022. Plasma was isolated from the blood cellular component by primary centrifugation and stored at −80 °C till usage. All samples were collected with approval from the Ethics Committee of the Shanghai General Hospital (Research Ethics Approval Code: 2022SQ123), and informed consent was obtained from all patients.

Mouse xenograft tumor experiment

Animal experiments were performed according to the guidelines of the National Institutes of Health and approved by the Animal Care Committee of Shanghai General Hospital. Briefly, we performed two groups of xenograft tumor experiments. The first group includes 18 BALB/C nude mice aged among 4–6 weeks. Stably transfected METTL16-WT/K229R/K229E AGS cells were injected into the upper back of the nude mice (6 mice per group, 1 × 10⁷ cells, 100 μL per mouse). The second group includes 24 BALB/C with the same conditions presented above. AGK2 (MCE, USA) was dissolved in 100% DMSO at 10 mM stock concentration, while elesclomol (MCE, USA) was diluted into 800 μl of DMSO to reach a final concentration of 156.05 mM. Both of compounds were diluted into working solution at 10% concentration for better dissolution (the ingredients of the cosolvent contained 40% PEG300, 5% Tween-80 and 45% saline). When tumors reached a volume of 100 mm³, mice were intraperitoneally injected with the dissolved compounds (100 μl per time), and the dose frequency was 3 times per week for 3 weeks for AGK2, while 4 times for 3 weeks for elesclomol. The weights and volumes of tumors were measured and calculated after collection.

m⁶A dot blot assay

Total RNA was isolated from GC cells that were treated with different concentrations of Cu²⁺ (0, 1, and 5 μM Cu²⁺), diluted to 50 and 10 ng/μL and denatured at 95 °C for 3 min. The samples were deposited on nitrocellulose filter membranes (Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA) and cross-linked by UV light twice, each for 5 min, followed by incubation with anti-m⁶A antibody (2 μg/ml; Abclonal, A19841, Wuhan, China) overnight at 4 °C. The spots were visualized using an imaging system after incubation with the secondary antibodies.

Antibody production and purification

The site-specific antibody of lactylated METTL16-K229 was purchased from the Shanghai HuiOu Biotechnology Co., Ltd. The process of production and purification was operated by the company. In brief, the antibody was raised by immunizing rabbits with the synthetic peptide C-EGGELEFVK(lactyl)RIIHDS coupled with keyhole limpet hemocyanin (KLH). Anti-serum was collected after four immunization doses. The valence of the antibody was detected using competitive ELISA⁶³ with the synthetic peptide (C-EGGELEFVK(lactyl)RIIHDS) and an unmodified peptide (C-EGGELEFVKRIIHDS).

RNA extraction and quantitative real-time polymerase reaction (qRT-PCR)

The total RNA was extracted from GC cells and tissues using EasyZol Reagent (NovaBio, Shanghai, China). The protein concentration was measured using a Nanodrop 2000 spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). Total RNA was reverse transcribed using HiScript III All-in-one RT SuperMix Perfect for qPCR (Vazyme, Shanghai, China) and diluted 5-fold. cDNA amplification was performed using Taq Pro Universal SYBR qPCR Master Mix (Vazyme, Shanghai, China) with the QuantStudio™ 6 Flex Real-Time PCR System (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA) using the following cycling conditions: 1 cycle of 95 °C for 30 s; 40 cycles of 95 °C for 10 s, 60 °C for 30 s; 1 cycle of 95 °C for 15 s, 60 °C for 60 s and following 95 °C for 15 s. β-actin was used as the internal control, and each sample was analyzed in triplicated. The results were analyzed using the 2^-ΔΔCT method and gene expression was reported relative to that of the internal control⁶⁴.

Luciferase reporter assay

Part of CDS (selected region:110456920-110457047, and 110462353-110462468) as well as 3’UTR regions (selected region: 110462469-110464884) of FDX1 were cloned into pGL3-control vectors (Genewiz, USA) which was comprised of firefly luciferase (F-luc). For mutant 602 reporter plasmid, the predicted adenosine (A) in m⁶A motif were replaced by thr (T), respectively. Pre-treated AGS cells were seeded into 24-well plate followed by co-transfection of 0.5 μg of wild-type or mutated FDX1 reporter plasmids and 25 ng pRL-TK plasmids (renilla luciferase reporter vector) using jetPRIME Polyplus kit. After 24–36 h, cells were harvested to access the luciferase activity using Dual-Glo Luciferase system (Promega, USA) with the normalization to pRL-TK. Each group was conducted in triplicate.

Western Blot

GC cells or tissues lysates were extracted using RIPA lysis buffer (Biosharp, Hefei, China) containing 1% PMSF solution (Beyotime Biotech, Shanghai, China) and 1% protease inhibitor cocktail (MedChemexpress, Monmouth Junction, NJ, USA) at 4 °C for 20 min. The protein concentration was quantified using the bicinchoninic acid (BCA) assay kit (Beyotime Biotech, China) and samples were diluted to the same protein concentration. Equal amounts of protein were separated by 10% SDS-PAGE electrophoresis (Epizyme Biotech, Shanghai, China) and transferred to an Immobilon-P PVDF membrane (Millipore, USA). After blocking with NcmBlot blocking buffer (NCM Biotech, Suzhou, China), the membrane was incubated overnight with primary antibodies, including anti-β-actin, (Servicebio, Wuhan, China, 1:2000), anti-Klac (PTM Bio, Hangzhou, China, 1:1000), anti-METTL16 (ABclonal Technology, Wuhan, China, 1:2000), anti-FDX1 (Proteintech, USA, 1:1000), anti-Lipoic Acid (Abcam, UK, 1:1000), anti-DLAT (Cell Signaling Technology, USA, 1:1000), anti-Ac (Cell Signaling Technology, USA, 1:500), anti-Flag (Sigma-Aldrich, USA, 1:3000), anti-GST (Cell Signaling Technology, USA, 1:1000), anti-SIRT2 (Cell Signaling Technology, USA) overnight. Subsequently, the membranes were incubated with secondary antibodies for 1 h at room temperature and visualized using NcmECL Ultra (NCM Biotech, Suzhou, China) with the Tanon 4600 Automatic Chemiluminescence/Fluorescence Image Analysis System (Tanon, Shanghai, China).

His-pull-down assay

Purified recombinant His-METTL16 or GST-SIRT2 proteins were expressed in E.coli and purified with Ni-NTA beads (Qiagen, Dusseldorf, Germany) or GE28401748 GSTrap™ 4B (GE, USA), and then washed with wash buffer (tris-buffered saline (TBS) containing 40 mM imidazole). GST or GST-SIRT2 protein was incubated with Ni-NTA beads with or without His-METTL16, following incubation at 4 °C overnight. The beads were pelleted, washed five times, and resuspended in 150 µL SDS loading buffer, boiled and analyzed by Western blotting.

Point mutation construction

A total of 26 pairs of PCR primers were designed and synthesized by Sangon Biotech (Shanghai, China) according to the prediction of the HPLC/MS/MS analysis. Point mutation plasmids were synthesized after general PCR using the METTL16 plasmid as a template with 2 × Phanta Max Master Mix (Vazyme, Nanjing, China). The products were treated with the restriction enzyme DpnI (New England Biolabs, Beijing, China) to eliminate the remaining plasmids. After undergoing transformation, selection, and transfection in HGC-27 cells, the successfully constructed point mutation plasmids were used in further experiments.

shRNA/siRNA design and construction

Specific shRNA primers and PLKO.1-puro lentiviral vectors were designed and purchased from Sangon Biotech. The synthesized oligonucleotides were annealed and ligated using BstYI/EcoRI (New England Biolabs) to the sites of PLKO.1-puro to produce PLKO.1-GFP-shMETTL16. Agarose gel electrophoresis was used to separate the specific proteins using a DNA purification kit (BioTeke, Beijing, China). Subsequently, the enzyme-digested fragments were ligated using the DNA Ligation kit (Takara Bio, Dalian, China). Fast-T1 competent cells (Vazyme) were used to transform the ligation products. The amplified bacterial colonies were cultured and subjected to Sanger sequencing. Lactyltransferase siRNAs were designed and produced (AZENTA, Suzhou, China) for verifying the relative lactyltransferase of METTL16. SiRNAs were transfected into GC cells using Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instruction. The sequences of siRNAs were listed below: EP300, 5′-CAATTCCGAGACATCTTGAGAdTdT; CBP, CCCGATAACTTTGTGATGT-TTdTdT; ACSS2, 5′-GCTTCTGTTCTGGGTCTGAATdTdT; AARS1, CGATGTCCAGA-AACGAGTGTTdTdT; AARS2, 5′-CCATCATACCTTCTTTGAAATdTdT; KAT6A, 5′-CCGCTGTCACAGTGTAGTATGdTdT; KAT8, 5′-CGAAATTGATGCCTGGTATTTdTdT; KAT5, 5′-TCGAATTGTTTGGGCACTGATdTdT; NMT1, 5′-CGGAAATTGGTTG-GGTTCATTdTdT; NMT2, 5′-CGAAGT-GCTCAAGGAGTTATAdTdT. METTL16-Sh1 was generated with 5′-CCCTTGAGACTCAACTATATT. METTL16-Sh2 was generated with 5′-ATGGCTGG-TATTTCCTCGCAA. METTL3-Sh was generated with 5′-GCCAAGGAACA-ATCCATTGTT. METTL14-Sh was generated with 5′-CCATGTACTTACAAGCCGATA.

Copper microplate assay

The Copper Microplate Assay Kit was purchased from Absin Bioscience (Shanghai, China). The GC tissue lysates extracted from 48 GC patients were used as the liquid samples. The experiment was performed according to the user manual.

Immunoprecipitation (IP)

Immunoprecipitation was performed as previously described⁶⁵. Briefly, cultured cells were lysed on the ice for 30 min using an IP lysis solution containing 1% protease inhibitor cocktail (MCE, USA). After centrifugation for 10 min, a 100 µL aliquot containing the total cellular proteins was incubated with 90 µL anti-FLAG M2 magnetic beads (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) overnight at 4 °C. The precipitate was washed three times with lysis buffer and then boiled with SDS-PAGE loading buffer (NCM Biotech). The supernatant was extracted for immunoblotting using the appropriate antibodies.

Immunofluorescence staining

GC cells transfected with point mutation plasmids were washed with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde at room temperature for 15 min, permeabilized with 0.5% Triton X-100 for 20 min and blocked with 3% BSA (PBS) for 30 min. Then the samples were incubated at 4 °C overnight with the primary antibody METTL16 (Abclonal Technology, Wuhan, China) diluted in 3% BSA (PBS) overnight. Subsequently, the cells were washed three times with PBS and incubated with fluorescein-labeled secondary antibodies diluted in PBS for 1 h at room temperature. The cells were stained and sealed with DAPI Fluoromount-G (Yeasen, Shanghai, China), and observed using a confocal microscope (Leica, Wetzlar, Germany).

MeRIP-qPCR

The m⁶A modifications on FDX1 mRNA were determined using the Ribo MeRIP m⁶A Transcriptome Profiling Kit (RiboBio, Canton, China). Briefly, about 50–100 g total RNA was extracted and fragmented using RNA fragmentation buffer, and one-tenth of the fragmented RNA was preserved as the input group. Subsequently, 25 μL A/G magnetic beads were prewashed and mixed with 5 μg of anti-m⁶A antibody (supplied by the kit). The prepared MeRIP reaction buffer was added to the beads, and the mixture was incubated at 4 °C for 2 h followed by washing three times. The conjugate was eluted and purified using the Magen Hipure Serum/Plasma miRNA Kit (Magen, Canton, China) prior to qPCR analysis as described above. Specific primers were designed for MeRIP-qPCR analysis according to the motif-dependent m⁶A site predictor SRAMP (http://www.cuilab.cn/sramp) (FDX1-F: CCCTGGCTTGTTCAACCTGT; FDX1-R: CCCAACCGTGATCTGTCTGTTA). (FDX1-merip-602-F1: TGCAATCACTGATGAGGAGAA; FDX1-merip-602-R1: TGTTTCAGGCA-CTCGAACAG and FDX1-merip-820-F2: GGCAAGACCTCCTGAACTAGAA; FDX1-merip-820-R2: TGCAAGGTGAATTAAAATAGTAAAGC). Relative enrichment of m⁶A was normalized to the input: %Input =1/10 × 2Ct [IP]—Ct [input].

Methylated RNA immunoprecipitation sequencing (MeRIP-seq)

Methylated RNA immunoprecipitation sequencing was performed and the results were analyzed by Shanghai Genechem Co.,Ltd (Shanghai, China). In brief, three samples of m⁶A-modified mRNAs were extracted, captured and purified as described above, then underwent cDNA synthesis and PCR amplification for further RNA-seq analysis. Raw data were imported into the analysis process: HISAT2 was used for mapping the unique reads, exomePeak was used for Peak Calling and RNA methylation differential analysis, and HOMER was used for searching motifs.

RNA immunoprecipitation (RIP) assays

The binding between METTL16 and FDX1 was assessed using the RNA-Binding Protein Immunoprecipitation Kit (Magna, Shanghai, China). Briefly, A/G magnetic beads were incubated at 4 °C overnight with 5 μg of METTL16 antibody and subjected to immunoprecipitation. Then, the RNA was extracted and purified using the phenol-chloroform-ethanol method. The relative interaction between METTL16 and FDX1 was determined by qPCR later, as described above.

RNA stability assays

GC cells were seeded into 6-well plates and treated with actinomycin D (5 μg/mL, Sigma-Aldrich, USA) at 1, 3, and 6 h, while DMSO (Sangon, Shanghai, China) was added to the negative control group at 0 h. Total RNA was isolated using the phenol-chloroform-ethanol method and then analyzed using qPCR. The mRNA half-live time was calculated according to the linear regression analysis⁶⁶.

CRISPR/Cas9 knockout cell lines

The single guide RNAs (sgRNAs) targeting human METTL16, 5ʹ- TAGGATGCCAGATATGCAAAGTC-3ʹ and 5ʹ-AAACGACTTTGCATATCTGGCAT-3ʹ, were designed with CRISPR Designer (http://crispr.mit.edu/) and cloned into plenty-sgRNA (puromycin resistant) and then were introduced into inducible Cas9 cell lines by lentivirus transduction. Cas 9 was induced using 1 μg/mL doxycycline hyclate for 3 days. To generate stable cell lines, we used doxycycline to knockout the non-essential genes for several days. After single-cell sorting, cells were expanded without doxycycline and clones were screened by immunofluorescence and Western blotting.

In vitro lactylation assay

The purified AARS1 or AARS2 (5 μM) and METTL16 (10 μM) or unmodified peptide (ELEFVK(229)RIIHD, 10 μM, synthesized by Gl Biochem (Shanghai) Co., Ltd) were incubated in reaction buffer (100 mM HEPES, 100 mM MgCl₂, 10 mM KCl, and 0.1 mM lactyl-CoA (PH = 7, Shanghai Nafu Biotechnology Co., Ltd)) at 37 °C for 2 h. The reaction products were analyzed by Western blotting with anti-lactylation.

Bioinformatic analysis

A total of 443 human tumor samples and 174 normal human gastric tissues were obtained from the TCGA (http://gdc-portal.nci.nih.gov) and GTEx (http://www.gtexportal.org) datasets that were available in public repositories. Gene expressions were analyzed using the R package ‘limma’ and ‘DESeq2’. ClusterProfiler package was used to perform gene ontology annotation and gene enrichment analysis in R studio. The average optical density (AOD) values of IFC results were measured by Image J software according to the formula: AOD = Integrated density value/ fluorescent area, at a certain threshold.

Ethical statement

We have complied with all relevant ethical regulations for animal testing and research. The research protocol was approved by the Animal Experiment Ethics Committee of Shanghai General Hospital.

Statistics and reproducibility

Statistical analysis was carried out using two-tailed Student’s t test, and the results are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation (SD) of three independent experiments. P values are indicated in the Figure legends. Microscopy images shown are representative of at least 5 fields from 3 independent experiments. Western Blot images are representative of three independent experiments. All biological and biochemical experiments were performed with appropriate internal negative and/or positive controls as indicated. All statistical analysis was performed and visualized using GraphPad Prism 9.4 software (GraphPad Software, La Jolla, CA, USA).

Reporting summary

Further information on research design is available in the Nature Portfolio Reporting Summary linked to this article.

Data availability

The original MeRIP-seq data generated in this study have been deposited in the GEO database under accession code: GSE224890. Other data generated in this study are provided in the Supplementary Information/Source Data file. Source data are provided with this paper.

References

Fukai, T., Ushio-Fukai, M. & Kaplan, J. H. Copper transporters and copper chaperones: roles in cardiovascular physiology and disease. Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol. 315, C186–c201 (2018).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Kardos, J. et al. Copper signalling: causes and consequences. Cell Commun. Signal 16, 71 (2018).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Rihel, J. Copper on the brain. Nat. Chem. Biol. 14, 638–639 (2018).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Sensi, S. L. et al. Copper and zinc dysregulation in Alzheimer’s disease. Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 39, 1049–1063 (2018).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Xiao, Y. et al. Copper promotion of myocardial regeneration. Exp. Biol. Med. 245, 911–921 (2020).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Yang, H. et al. Obesity is associated with copper elevation in serum and tissues. Metallomics 11, 1363–1371 (2019).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Bossak, K. et al. The Cu(II) affinity of the N-terminus of human copper transporter CTR1: comparison of human and mouse sequences. J. Inorg. Biochem. 182, 230–237 (2018).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Pavithra, V. et al. Serum levels of metal ions in female patients with breast cancer. J. Clin. Diagn. Res. 9, BC25–c27 (2015).
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Stepien, M. et al. Pre-diagnostic copper and zinc biomarkers and colorectal cancer risk in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition cohort. Carcinogenesis 38, 699–707 (2017).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Majumder, S. et al. The role of copper in drug-resistant murine and human tumors. Biometals 22, 377–384 (2009).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Tsvetkov, P. et al. Copper induces cell death by targeting lipoylated TCA cycle proteins. Science 375, 1254–1261 (2022).
Article ADS CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Kahlson, M. A. & Dixon, S. J. Copper-induced cell death. Science 375, 1231–1232 (2022).
Article ADS CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Tsvetkov, P. et al. Mitochondrial metabolism promotes adaptation to proteotoxic stress. Nat. Chem. Biol. 15, 681–689 (2019).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Barbieri, I. & Kouzarides, T. Role of RNA modifications in cancer. Nat. Rev. Cancer 20, 303–322 (2020).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Deng, X. et al. RNA N(6)-methyladenosine modification in cancers: current status and perspectives. Cell Res. 28, 507–517 (2018).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Zhang, Y. et al. One stomach, two subtypes of carcinoma-the differences between distal and proximal gastric cancer. Gastroenterol. Rep. 9, 489–504 (2021).
Article Google Scholar
Liu, L. et al. Insights into N6-methyladenosine and programmed cell death in cancer. Mol. Cancer 21, 32 (2022).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Xu, Y. & Huang, C. Progress and application of epitranscriptomic m(6)A modification in gastric cancer. RNA Biol. 19, 885–896 (2022).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Satterwhite, E. R. & Mansfield, K. D. RNA methyltransferase METTL16: targets and function. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. RNA 13, e1681 (2022).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Ruszkowska, A. METTL16, methyltransferase-like protein 16: current Insights into structure and function. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 22, 2176 (2021).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Warda, A. S. et al. Human METTL16 is a N(6)-methyladenosine (m(6)A) methyltransferase that targets pre-mRNAs and various non-coding RNAs. EMBO Rep. 18, 2004–2014 (2017).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Shima, H. et al. S-Adenosylmethionine synthesis is regulated by selective N(6)-adenosine methylation and mRNA degradation involving METTL16 and YTHDC1. Cell Rep. 21, 3354–3363 (2017).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Pendleton, K. E. et al. The U6 snRNA m(6)A methyltransferase METTL16 regulates SAM synthetase intron retention. Cell 169, 824–835.e14 (2017).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Wang, X. K. et al. METTL16 promotes cell proliferation by up-regulating cyclin D1 expression in gastric cancer. J. Cell Mol. Med. 25, 6602–6617 (2021).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Wang, S. et al. The differentiation of colorectal cancer is closely relevant to m⁶A modification. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 546, 65–73 (2021).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Zhang, T., Sheng, P. & Jiang, Y. m⁶A regulators are differently expressed and correlated with immune response of pancreatic adenocarcinoma. J. Cancer Res. Clin. Oncol. 149, 2805–2822 (2023).
Dai, Y. Z. et al. METTL16 promotes hepatocellular carcinoma progression through downregulating RAB11B-AS1 in an m(6)A-dependent manner. Cell Mol. Biol. Lett. 27, 41 (2022).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Zhang, Y. & Yang, Y. Effects of m⁶A RNA methylation regulators on endometrial cancer. J. Clin. Lab. Anal. 35, e23942 (2021).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Su, R. et al. METTL16 exerts an m(6)A-independent function to facilitate translation and tumorigenesis. Nat. Cell Biol. 24, 205–216 (2022).
Article MathSciNet CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Zhang, D. et al. Metabolic regulation of gene expression by histone lactylation. Nature 574, 575–580 (2019).
Article ADS CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Brooks, G. A. et al. Role of mitochondrial lactate dehydrogenase and lactate oxidation in the intracellular lactate shuttle. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 96, 1129–1134 (1999).
Article ADS CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Hagihara, H. et al. Protein lactylation induced by neural excitation. Cell Rep 37, 109820 (2021).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Yu, J. et al. Histone lactylation drives oncogenesis by facilitating m(6)A reader protein YTHDF2 expression in ocular melanoma. Genome Biol. 22, 85 (2021).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Sun, Y. et al. Genetic encoding of epsilon-N-L-lactyllysine for detecting delactylase activity in living cells. Chem. Commun. 58, 8544–8547 (2022).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Zu, H. et al. SIRT2 functions as a histone delactylase and inhibits the proliferation and migration of neuroblastoma cells. Cell Discov. 8, 54 (2022).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Moreno-Yruela, C. et al. Class I histone deacetylases (HDAC1-3) are histone lysine delactylases. Sci. Adv. 8, eabi6696 (2022).
Article ADS CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Zhang, X. et al. Screening, expression, purification and characterization of CoA-transferases for lactoyl-CoA generation. J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 46, 899–909 (2019).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Yang, K. et al. Lactate promotes macrophage HMGB1 lactylation, acetylation, and exosomal release in polymicrobial sepsis. Cell Death Differ. 29, 133–146 (2021).
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Tseng, C. H. et al. The clinicopathological characteristics and genetic alterations of mucinous carcinoma of the stomach. J. Chin. Med. Assoc. 83, 141–147 (2020).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Ge, L. et al. Level of N6-methyladenosine in peripheral blood RNA: a novel predictive biomarker for gastric cancer. Clin. Chem. 66, 342–351 (2020).
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Fan, H. N. et al. METTL14-mediated m(6)A modification of circORC5 suppresses gastric cancer progression by regulating miR-30c-2-3p/AKT1S1 axis. Mol. Cancer 21, 51 (2022).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Gao, Q. et al. A WNT7B-m(6)A-TCF7L2 positive feedback loop promotes gastric cancer progression and metastasis. Signal Transduct. Target Ther. 6, 43 (2021).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Hu, Y. et al. Demethylase ALKBH5 suppresses invasion of gastric cancer via PKMYT1 m6A modification. Mol. Cancer 21, 34 (2022).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Wang, Q. et al. APAF1-binding long noncoding RNA promotes tumor growth and multidrug resistance in gastric cancer by blocking apoptosome assembly. Adv. Sci. 9, e2201889 (2022).
Article MathSciNet Google Scholar
Wei, X. et al. METTL3 preferentially enhances non-m(6)A translation of epigenetic factors and promotes tumourigenesis. Nat. Cell Biol. 24, 1278–1290 (2022).
Article MathSciNet CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Yue, B. et al. METTL3-mediated N6-methyladenosine modification is critical for epithelial-mesenchymal transition and metastasis of gastric cancer. Mol Cancer 18, 142 (2019).
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Zhang, F. et al. Crosstalk among m(6)A RNA methylation, hypoxia and metabolic reprogramming in TME: from immunosuppressive microenvironment to clinical application. J. Hematol. Oncol. 15, 84 (2022).
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Wong, J. M. & Eirin-Lopez, J. M. Evolution of methyltransferase-like (METTL) proteins in metazoa: a complex gene family involved in epitranscriptomic regulation and other epigenetic processes. Mol. Biol. Evol. 38, 5309–5327 (2021).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Zhang, C., Ding, Z. & Luo, H. The prognostic role of m⁶A-related genes in paediatric neuroblastoma patients. Comput. Math. Methods Med. 2022, 8354932 (2022).
PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Aoyama, T., Yamashita, S. & Tomita, K. Mechanistic insights into m⁶A modification of U6 snRNA by human METTL16. Nucleic Acids Res. 48, 5157–5168 (2020).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Colonna, L. et al. Evidence for persistence of the SHIV reservoir early after MHC haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Nat. Commun. 9, 4438 (2018).
Article ADS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Sarikhani, M. et al. SIRT2 regulates oxidative stress-induced cell death through deacetylation of c-Jun NH2-terminal kinase. Cell Death Differ. 25, 1638–1656 (2018).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Zhang, Z. et al. FDX1 can impact the prognosis and mediate the metabolism of lung adenocarcinoma. Front. Pharmacol. 12, 749134 (2021).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Linder, M. C. Copper homeostasis in mammals, with emphasis on secretion and excretion. a review. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 21, 4932 (2020).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Warburg, O. The metabolism of carcinoma cells. J. Cancer Res. 9, 148–163 (1924).
Article Google Scholar
Noe, J. T. et al. Lactate supports a metabolic-epigenetic link in macrophage polarization. Sci. Adv. 7, eabi8602 (2021).
Article ADS CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Liberti, M. V. & Locasale, J. W. The Warburg Effect: how does it benefit cancer cells? Trends Biochem. Sci. 41, 211–218 (2016).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Ashton, T. M. et al. Oxidative phosphorylation as an emerging target in cancer therapy. Clin. Cancer Res. 24, 2482–2490 (2018).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Zhang, G. et al. Variable copy number of mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) predicts worse prognosis in advanced gastric cancer patients. Diagn. Pathol. 8, 173 (2013).
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Li, Y. et al. Author Correction: Proteomic characterization of gastric cancer response to chemotherapy and targeted therapy reveals potential therapeutic strategies. Nat. Commun. 13, 6749 (2022).
Article ADS CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Doxtader, K. A. et al. Structural basis for regulation of METTL16, an S-adenosylmethionine homeostasis factor. Mol. Cell 71, 1001–1011 e4 (2018).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Zhu, Z. et al. The novel GINS4 axis promotes gastric cancer growth and progression by activating Rac1 and CDC42. Theranostics 9, 8294–8311 (2019).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Kohl, T. O. & Ascoli, C. A. Direct competitive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Cold Spring Harb. Protoc. 2017, pdb prot093740 (2017).
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Fan, G. et al. Loss of KLF14 triggers centrosome amplification and tumorigenesis. Nat Commun 6, 8450 (2015).
Article ADS CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Fan, G. et al. The ATM and ATR kinases regulate centrosome clustering and tumor recurrence by targeting KIFC1 phosphorylation. Nat. Commun. 12, 20 (2021).
Article ADS CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Fu, X., Djekidel, M. N. & Zhang, Y. A transcriptional roadmap for 2C-like-to-pluripotent state transition. Sci. Adv. 6, eaay5181 (2020).
Article ADS CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (32270749, 82072662, 31970720, and 32070770), Shanghai Three-year Action Plan to Promote Clinical Skills and Clinical Innovation in Municipal Hospitals (SHDC2020CR4022), Shanghai Municipal Education Commission—Gaofeng Clinical Medicine Grant Support (the second round, 20191425).

Author information

These authors contributed equally: Lianhui Sun, Yuan Zhang, Boyu Yang, Sijun Sun.

Authors and Affiliations

Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 201620, China
Lianhui Sun, Yuan Zhang, Sijun Sun, Pengshan Zhang, Zai Luo, Zhengjun Qiu & Chen Huang
Precision Research Center for Refractory Diseases, Institute for Clinical Research, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 201620, China
Lianhui Sun, Ting Zhu & Guangjian Fan
Department of Urology, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100050, China
Boyu Yang
Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 201620, China
Tingting Feng
Department of Laboratory Medicine, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 201620, China
Zelin Cui
Department of Critical Care Medicine, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 201620, China
Yuming Li

Authors

Lianhui Sun
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Yuan Zhang
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Boyu Yang
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Sijun Sun
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Pengshan Zhang
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Zai Luo
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Tingting Feng
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Zelin Cui
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Ting Zhu
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Yuming Li
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Zhengjun Qiu
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Guangjian Fan
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Chen Huang
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

L.S., Y.Z., S.S., T.F., Z.C., T.Z., Y.L., and G.F. performed experiments. B.Y., Y.Z., S.S., P.Z., Z.L., and G.F. interpreted data and wrote the manuscript. Z.Q., G.F., and C.H. supervised the study and reviewed the manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Guangjian Fan or Chen Huang.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Communications thanks Peter Tsvetkov and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. A peer review file is available.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Peer Review File

Description of Additional Supplementary Files

Supplementary Data 1

Supplementary Data 2

Reporting Summary

Source data

Source Data

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sun, L., Zhang, Y., Yang, B. et al. Lactylation of METTL16 promotes cuproptosis via m⁶A-modification on FDX1 mRNA in gastric cancer. Nat Commun 14, 6523 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-42025-8

Download citation

Received: 11 October 2022
Accepted: 27 September 2023
Published: 20 October 2023
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-42025-8

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.