Non-covalent inhibitors of thioredoxin glutathione reductase with schistosomicidal activity in vivo

Petukhova, Valentina Z.; Aboagye, Sammy Y.; Ardini, Matteo; Lullo, Rachel P.; Fata, Francesca; Byrne, Margaret E.; Gabriele, Federica; Martin, Lucy M.; Harding, Luke N. M.; Gone, Vamshikrishna; Dangi, Bikash; Lantvit, Daniel D.; Nikolic, Dejan; Ippoliti, Rodolfo; Effantin, Grégory; Ling, Wai Li; Johnson, Jeremy J.; Thatcher, Gregory R. J.; Angelucci, Francesco; Williams, David L.; Petukhov, Pavel A.

doi:10.1038/s41467-023-39444-y

Download PDF

Article
Open access
Published: 22 June 2023

Non-covalent inhibitors of thioredoxin glutathione reductase with schistosomicidal activity in vivo

Nature Communications volume 14, Article number: 3737 (2023) Cite this article

4304 Accesses
4 Citations
22 Altmetric
Metrics details

Subjects

Abstract

Only praziquantel is available for treating schistosomiasis, a disease affecting more than 200 million people. Praziquantel-resistant worms have been selected for in the lab and low cure rates from mass drug administration programs suggest that resistance is evolving in the field. Thioredoxin glutathione reductase (TGR) is essential for schistosome survival and a validated drug target. TGR inhibitors identified to date are irreversible and/or covalent inhibitors with unacceptable off-target effects. In this work, we identify noncovalent TGR inhibitors with efficacy against schistosome infections in mice, meeting the criteria for lead progression indicated by WHO. Comparisons with previous in vivo studies with praziquantel suggests that these inhibitors outperform the drug of choice for schistosomiasis against juvenile worms.

Streptomyces umbrella toxin particles block hyphal growth of competing species

Article Open access 17 April 2024

Lipid nanoparticles for mRNA delivery

Article 10 August 2021

Strategies to reduce the risks of mRNA drug and vaccine toxicity

Article 23 January 2024

Introduction

Schistosomiasis is a devastating but neglected tropical disease with more than 200 million people infected resulting in more than 200,000 deaths annually^1,2. In addition, almost everyone infected has a significant degree of disability³. Female genital schistosomiasis is a common complication, occurring in approximately 40 million girls and women, making it one of the most common gynecologic conditions in Africa, and schistosome infections have been implicated as cofactors in the acquisition and transmission of HIV and are a WHO-recognized risk factor for HIV infection^4,5. Schistosomiasis control strategies rely almost exclusively on mass drug administration (MDA) using praziquantel (PZQ) monotherapy. No alternatives to PZQ are currently available and few drugs or vaccines are in the clinical pipeline for schistosomiasis treatment^6,7,8. Given this situation it is particularly concerning that MDA campaigns show that PZQ cure rates are often less than 50% and modeling studies demonstrating that these campaigns with PZQ alone are unlikely to interrupt transmission, and once MDA is suspended, the prevalence of infection is likely to rebound to pre-MDA levels^9,10,11. Furthermore, with large-scale drug use it is inevitable that PZQ-resistant parasites will evolve, and PZQ resistance has been induced in laboratory infections¹². In addition, PZQ has limited activity against juvenile liver-stage worms¹³ and, although progress is being made¹⁴, it is difficult to administer to children. Therefore, the identification of new drugs for this disease is indispensable.

We have previously shown that schistosome redox defenses are limited, and that as such they can be disrupted pharmacologically leading to worm death in vitro and in vivo¹⁵. Additionally, we have found that schistosomes do not have either an authentic glutathione disulfide reductase (GR) or thioredoxin reductase (TrxR) enzymes. Instead, both these activities are provided by selenocysteine (Sec/U)-containing thioredoxin glutathione reductase (TGR)¹⁶. TGR is a 130 kDa obligate homodimer as the functional stereochemistry of the FAD redox site in each subunit is generated by protein dimerization. The enzymatic cycle of TGR (Fig. 1a) can be subdivided into a reductive half-reaction (electrons flow from NADPH to the enzyme) and an oxidative half-reaction (electrons from the enzyme are transferred to the oxidizing substrates)¹⁷. Reducing equivalents from NADPH are transferred to the FAD redox site of TGR comprised by the isoalloxazine ring of the flavin and a pair of nearby cysteines (C154/C159). From here, electrons are transferred to the C-terminal redox site of the other subunit where the Sec residue lies adjacent to another cysteine (C597’/U598’). This mobile redox active arm can transfer electrons to the incoming oxidized Trx or internally to the Grx domain (C28/C31) of the partner subunit where reduction of oxidized glutathione (GSSG) occurs. The TGR species with two electrons accepted from one NADPH is the EH₂ form. Following generation of the EH₂ a second NADPH binds and donates electrons generating the EH₄ form, which is competent for substrate reduction. Using both reverse genetic and pharmacological approaches, we have demonstrated that TGR is an essential and druggable target for the treatment of schistosomiasis^18,19,20.

**Fig. 1: From small molecules fragments bound to the doorstop pocket to the inhibitors designed in this study.**

Further development of TGR-based therapeutic approaches is impeded by the lack of non-covalent small molecule inhibitors of TGR, a well-known and general problem for all the members of the high molecular weight, Sec-containing TrxR subfamily that are considered attractive and unexploited drug targets for several human diseases^21,22. Known inhibitors of TGRs/TrxRs, which include metal complexes and compounds containing Michael acceptors or oxadiazole oxides^19,23,24, usually react with Sec and Cys residues and other biogenic nucleophiles irreversibly. Covalent/irreversible inhibitors target the redox/catalytic apparatus of TGR with almost no recognition elements that give affinity and selectivity for TGR over off-targets and the cellular redox apparatus resulting in undesirable cross-reactions and low specificity in vivo²⁵. Although anti-infective covalent inhibitors can offer long residence times in their targets and low systemic circulation time in the host (see ref. ²⁶ and the references therein), they have limitations associated with well-known multiple adverse reactions, genotoxicity, and special requirements for storage, handling, and administration, posing challenges with respect to the standard operating procedure (SOP) for MDA campaigns requiring single or double dose activity, oral administration, minimal toxicity, and stability in tropical settings²⁷. Both potassium antimonial tartrate and oltipraz inhibit TGR¹⁸ by a covalent mechanism and were used clinically for schistosomiasis treatment but were discontinued due to unacceptable side effects^28,29.

Our extensive biochemical analyses of TGR combined with 3D structures of TGR complexes with various substrates, inhibitors, and in different redox states^17,30,31,32, allow us to define in detail the catalytic mechanisms of TGR. In our recent studies, we have identified a different inhibition mechanism of TGR in which an inhibitor binds non-covalently at the so-called doorstop pocket interfering with enzyme function^33,34.

In this work, small molecule fragments obtained by X-ray crystallography are ligated and partially optimized as non-covalent, and orally bioavailable inhibitors of TGR. We report the cryo-EM structure of TGR demonstrating that these inhibitors bind at the doorstop pocket preventing the NADPH oxidation steps. These compounds display schistosomicidal activity against different parasite-life cycle stages reaching the nanomolar range. Most importantly, they demonstrate efficacy against schistosome infections in mice, meeting the criteria for lead progression indicated by WHO, and outperform the previously reported efficacy of praziquantel against juvenile worms¹³.

Results

Fragment-based drug design and chemistry

Utilizing “actives” identified in a quantitative high-throughput screen against Schistosoma mansoni TGR^20,35, 92 commercially available low molecular weight (MW) compounds/fragments were tested by X-ray crystallography^33,34,36. Some of the fragments, for which X-ray structures were obtained, were found in the doorstop pocket expected to be critical for TGR inhibition and adjacent to the NADPH binding site (Fig. 1b, c)³³. In the doorstop pocket, subpocket A binds 2-carboxynaphthyridine and subpockets B and C bind 4-(2-hydroxyethyl)−1-piperazineethane (HEPE) as shown in Fig. 1c. TGR IC₅₀s for these low MW fragments varied from 0.76 mM to 4.4 mM. Considering their low MW and non-covalent nature of inhibition of TGR, these compounds were deemed appropriate for fragment-based design.

Further structure-based iterative optimization resulting in inhibitors shown in Fig. 1d was driven by bioisosteric replacement of the fragments bound to subpockets A-C, scaffold-hopping, de novo design, and medicinal chemistry and was facilitated by SZMAP/GamePlan³⁷, vBrood³⁸, and MOE software³⁹. The computational analysis in Fig. 1e, f was facilitated by combining two X-ray fragments found in subpockets A-C in PDB:6FP4 and PBD:6FTC via a short CH₂CH₂ linker in a putative chimera molecule. Since all the fragments crystallized in subpocket C contained HEPE moiety with an additional polar substituent, it was tempting to think that a similar polar moiety should be placed in subpocket C. We noticed, however, that the bottom part of subpocket C in the vicinity of the fragments found in the X-ray structures is formed by the hydrophobic portions of D325, Y479, A481, H538, G483, V469, T471 and is likely to prefer bulky hydrophobic substituents. Consistent with this observation, all non-polar attachments proposed by GamePlan in subpocket C congregated near the piperazine ring of HEPE at the bottom of subpocket C (Fig. 1e). The published TGR X-ray structures also contained several water molecules in subpockets A and C (Fig. 1f). Considering that the water molecules were trapped largely in the hydrophobic pockets, often made contacts with or were displaced by the fragments, and did not appear to play a structural role, we anticipated that their displacement with larger non-polar moieties would improve binding of newly designed inhibitors. An analysis of the free energy minima and maxima for the water probe in subpockets A-C using SZMAP³⁷ and WaterOrientation extension in VIDA⁴⁰ is shown in Fig. 1f and Supplementary Movie 1. The bottom of subpocket C in proximity to the chimera ligand contained several mostly non-polar (purple) probes with positive free energy values, indicating that it may be filled with additional non-polar substituents. The locations of waters found in the X-ray structures either overlapped or were very close to the locations of the probes placed by SZMAP. This observation further strengthened the notion that additional binding free energy could be gained not only by forming meaningful interactions with the doorstop pocket but also by liberating the trapped waters.

Further visual inspection in VIDA of the vBrood search for candidates that can fill the doorstop pocket led us, among other possible scaffolds, to pinane in subpocket C. The sp³ carbon scaffold of the pinane rings offered an effective way to capture interactions with the hydrophobic portions of subpocket C while also displacing likely trapped waters. Subpockets A and B are also mostly hydrophobic and with only a few polar groups available to make polar interactions with the ligand. While subpockets B and C are rather large, subpocket A is narrow and restricted in depth by FAD at the bottom of the pocket, limiting the choice of modifications of the inhibitor in subpocket A. Although the SZMAP and GamePlan analyses (Fig. 1e, f) suggested placement of polar and non-polar substituents in multiple locations, including those that were relatively remote, we intentionally limited the modifications to those in proximity or to the putative chimera molecule itself to maximize the potential for further improvements during structure-activity relationship (SAR) studies. By advancing through several generations of inhibitors, a series of inhibitors of TGR was obtained (Fig. 1d) with activity against recombinant TGR improving from the mM range for the fragments alone to the single digit µM range. Of more than 100 compounds synthesized and tested for TGR inhibition (a more thorough description of compound design will form the basis of a future manuscript), the most promising were selected to be extensively characterized in the in vitro and in vivo studies described below. The candidates selected are predicted to be orally bioavailable according to the analysis of Lipinski et al.⁴¹ (Table 1, Supplementary Table 1). The synthesis and characterization of compounds in Table 1 are described in Supplementary Methods, Supplementary Figs. 1–20, and Supplementary Tables 1–14.

Table 1 Biochemical characterization of 1–10, controls 11, 12, auranofin (AF), praziquantel (PZQ), meclonazepam (MZM) and photoreactive probe (PRP)

Full size table

TGR is inhibited in S. mansoni worms

The activities against recombinant TGR of the inhibitors in Fig. 1d ranged from a modest 28.7% inhibition at 67 µM to robust activity with IC₅₀ = 2.5 µM (Table 1). A predicted outcome of TGR inhibition in worms is the accumulation of oxidized GSH (GSSG) because of attenuated reduction to GSH by TGR, leading to decreases in the GSH/GSSG ratio. To characterize compound engagement of TGR in adult worms ex vivo, the GSH/GSSG ratio was measured for compounds in Table 1. After a 3 h exposure to compounds at 50 µM, large decreases in GSH/GSSG of 20 to 75% were observed. Under the same conditions, treatment with the current drug of choice, PZQ, or the clinically tested and now discontinued meclonazepam (MZM)⁴², which have different schistosomicidal mechanisms and do not inhibit TGR, resulted in no change of that ratio. Treatment with positive control auranofin (AF), a covalent TGR inhibitor with schistosomicidal activity¹⁸, decreased GSH/GSSG ratio by 90%. Treatment with inactive, negative control compounds (11 and 12), structurally related to the active inhibitors 1-10, had minimal effect on the GSH/GSSG in treated worms.

To further characterize compound engagement of TGR in ex vivo worms using an orthogonal assay, inhibition of TGR activity in newly transformed schistosomula (NTS, skin-stage worms) was assessed using a TrxR-selective fluorescent probe^43,44, TRFS-Green. The fluorescence of TRFS-Green is induced by the TGR (or TrxR)-mediated disulfide cleavage followed by intramolecular cyclization to liberate the masked naphthalimide fluorophore. Treatment of NTS with inhibitors 1, 2, 4, 7, and 8, positive control AF, or negative control 12 for 2 h was followed by addition of TRFS-Green. Fluorescence in wells was determined hourly for the first 5 h and at the terminal point of 24 h after addition of probe. NTS treated with TRFS-Green only were clearly fluorescent after 2 h incubation (Fig. 2, Supplementary Fig. 21). Treatment with inhibitors 1, 2, 4, 7, and 8, and AF led to significant decreases in fluorescence. Consistent with the outcome of the measurements of the GSH/GSSG ratio, negative control 12 had negligible effects on TRFS-Green fluorescence (Fig. 2). Overall, these findings indicate that the TGR inhibitors engage TGR in ex vivo worms.

**Fig. 2: Inhibition of TGR in newly transformed schistosomula (NTS) visualized with TRFS-Green.**

TGR inhibitors do not react covalently with GSH, selenocysteine, or TGR, and inhibition of TGR is reversible

To evaluate stability of the TGR inhibitors in the presence of GSH and selenocysteine, compound 2 and a known covalent inhibitor of TGR, TRi-1^20,45, were incubated with GSH or the N-Boc protected methyl ester of selenocysteine, and the reaction mixtures were analyzed by LCMS (Supplementary Figs. 22 and 23). Unlike TRi-1, no reaction of 2 with either thiol or selenol groups in GSH or protected selenocysteine was observed. Incubation of inhibitor 2 under the biochemical assay conditions with TGR and with or without NADPH resulted in no formation of derivatives of 2. To evaluate reversibility, TGR inhibitors were tested in the jump dilution assay^46,47. In the jump dilution assay, after incubation of enzyme, NADPH, and inhibitor, the reactions are diluted to well below the IC₅₀ for the inhibitor allowing its release from the enzyme and activity is determined. We find that our inhibitors are reversible, while known covalent TGR inhibitors^20,45, including AF, Stattic, and TRi-1, are irreversible (Fig. 3a).

**Fig. 3: Functional characterization of the inhibitors.**

TGR inhibitors target a reduced form of TGR

Next, we investigated if the TGR redox state affects the binding and activity of the inhibitors. Inhibitors 6-8 were incubated with TGR with and without NADPH, and the inhibition of TGR activity was determined after adding a second aliquot of NADPH and 5,5’-dithiobis (2-nitrobenzoic acid) (DTNB). Incubation of these inhibitors with TGR in the absence of NADPH led to significantly attenuated enzyme inhibition compared to inhibition resulting from incubation in the presence of NADPH (Fig. 3b).

Typical TGR inhibitor studies utilize a 15-minute preincubation step of enzyme, NADPH, and inhibitor. The reaction is started by the addition of substrate, DTNB or GSSG, and a second aliquot of NADPH. While compounds 6-8 caused maximal inhibition of TGR within 15 min (referred to here as fast inhibitors; Table 1, Fig. 3c), compounds 1-5 were found to be slow inhibitors as they displayed little to no inhibition after 15 min, but time-dependent inhibition of TGR over 25 h (Fig. 3d and Table 1).

Steady state studies varying NADPH and inhibitor concentrations indicate that treatment with the fast inhibitors 7 and 8 or the slow inhibitor 3, (the only slow inhibitor reaching equilibrium in 6 h), resulted in decreases in both K_m and V_max values consistent with uncompetitive inhibition of TGR, while treatment with 9, a close analog of compound 8 synthesized ad hoc to facilitate structural studies (see below), changed only the V_max indicating noncompetitive inhibition (Supplementary Tables 15 and 16). Determination of steady state parameters for all the compounds was not possible due to low solubility at high micromolar concentrations. The change from uncompetitive to non-competitive mechanism induced by chemical modifications of the inhibitors is not rare in drug design studies^48,49,50. In general, both uncompetitive and noncompetitive inhibitors exert their action through the binding of the ES complex and/or downstream catalytic species, with the difference that noncompetitive ones bind also to free enzyme. In TGR, and more generally in TrxRs, electron transfer from NADPH to the enzyme is fast and practically irreversible and so an actual ES complex (NADPH-TGR) is not significantly populated during the catalytic cycle¹⁷. We refer to the species formed after NADPH binding (the ES downstream species) as NADP⁺-TGR(H) reduced complexes, indicating that electrons are inside the polypeptide chain of the enzyme giving rise to the EH₂ and the EH₄ species (Fig. 1a). To obtain orthogonal proof that our inhibitors bind to the NADP⁺-TGR(H) forms, we evaluated their effect on thermal stability of TGR using the thermal shift assay (TSA or differential scanning fluorometry). A modification of the assay developed for flavoproteins has been reported and was utilized here⁵¹. Oxidized TGR had a T_m of 73.7 °C, whereas TGR reduced with NADPH displayed a T_m of 66.5 °C (Fig. 3e), indicating destabilization of the polypeptide chain upon enzyme reduction. Neither fast 6-9 nor slow TGR inhibitors 1, 3, 5 affected the T_m of oxidized TGR. On the other hand, in the presence of NADPH there was an increase in the T_m of 3.5–7.2 °C providing further evidence that the ES complex is the target of the inhibitors. The same time dependence on the shift in T_m was seen for the compounds; fast inhibitors affected the T_m in 15 min., while the slow inhibitors required >2 h to cause a shift in T_m. Structurally similar non-inhibitors 11 and 12 had no effect on the T_m of either oxidized or reduced TGR. Next, we evaluated photocrosslinking between a photoreactive probe (PRP) (a slow inhibitor of TGR, Fig. 1d, Table 1) and recombinant TGR in the presence or absence of NADPH (Supplementary Fig. 24) using procedures we published previously⁵². In the presence of NADPH, labeling of TGR was more effective at both 5 and 50 μM of PRP than that without NADPH, indicating a higher yield of TGR-PRP adduct when NADPH was present. A control protein, S. mansoni histone deacetylase 8, was not labeled with or without NAPDH. Overall, the experiments clearly demonstrate preferable binding of our inhibitors to the NADP⁺-TGR(H) complexes.

Inhibitors do not convert TGR into an NADPH oxidase

Several covalent inhibitors of TGR are electrophilic compounds reacting with the Sec residue at the C-terminus, which induce a transition in the enzyme from an antioxidant to a pro-oxidant with increased NADPH consumption^20,45. As expected, Stattic and TRi-1 converted TGR to a pro-oxidant enzyme, whereas our non-covalent inhibitors did not increase NADPH consumption or superoxide production (Fig. 3f, g), indicating again the lack of involvement of the Sec-containing C-terminus in the mechanism of action of these TGR inhibitors.

TGR inhibitors bind to the doorstop pocket

To gain additional insights into the mechanism of inhibition, we conducted a series of structural studies. Our attempts to obtain X-ray co-crystal structures of TGR and inhibitors resulted in structures with no detectable density of the inhibitors, possibly owing to the limited solubility of the compounds in the crystallization conditions. To increase aqueous solubility of the compounds to facilitate structural studies, the cycloheptyl substituent in TGR uncompetitive inhibitor 8 was replaced with a sugar moiety, resulting in compound 9, a noncompetitive inhibitor and thus capable of binding the enzyme in absence of NADPH. However, co-crystallization trials failed again. We, therefore, used alternative approaches and have determined the structure of a high molecular weight TrxR subfamily member using cryo-EM, demonstrating the feasibility of this methodology to study this protein subfamily of importance in several human diseases (PDB ID 8A1R, EMD-15084) (Fig. 4, Supplementary Table 17, Supplementary Fig. 25). First, the TGR-9 complex was subjected to negative staining TEM to assess quality of TGR particles and then, upon sample vitrification, to a cryo-EM operating at 200 kV (Supplementary Fig. 25). After structural refinement of the X-ray structure of TGR into the cryo-EM map obtained at 3.6 Å resolution (as estimated by the gold-standard Fourier shell correlation at 0.143 Supplementary Fig. 25 and Fig. 4a), additional electron density ascribable to the compound is present in the doorstop pocket (Fig. 4b). Upon placement of the compound into the cryo-EM map and structural refinement we find that 9 adopts two conformations in both subunits, spanning the three subpockets A, B and C (Fig. 4b, c). Conformational changes induced by compound binding are not detected at this resolution. The correlation coefficient (CC) of 9 in the two different conformations is in the 0.67–0.71 range, close to the CCs of the FAD cofactor in each subunit (CC = 0.73–0.74). The two conformations differ in the position of the polar sugar moiety and in the orientation of the indole that is 180° rotated with respect to each other (Fig. 4b, c). In both conformations, the pinane ring of the compound interacts with F324, V469, T471, A481 and L484 in subpocket C (Supplementary Fig. 26), the indole interacts with F324, G325, P439 and L441 present in subpocket B (Fig. 1), while the sugar moiety, through its hydroxyl groups, is close to the main chain carbonyls of G323 and R322 in one conformation and with the analogous groups of G437 and Q440 occupying the hydrophilic portion of subpocket A in the other conformation. In agreement with the noncompetitive behavior of 9 and as determined by structural superposition of the cryo-EM structure and the X-ray NADPH-TGR- complex¹⁷, inhibitor 9 does not sterically interfere with NADPH binding. Instead, it contacts F324, a conserved residue in GRs and high molecular weight TrxRs involved in the recognition of the oxidized nicotinamide moiety of NADP⁺⁵³, suggesting that 9 may interfere with NADP⁺ release and/or with the structural changes associated with it, slowing down the oscillations between EH₂ and EH₄ during enzyme turn-over (Fig. 5).

**Fig. 4: Cryo-EM structure of the TGR-9 complex.**

**Fig. 5: Proposed mechanism of inhibition for the compounds described in this study.**

TGR inhibitors can achieve selectivity over mammalian enzymes

Compounds 1-8 affected viability of Vero cells (EC₅₀) mostly at concentrations >50 µM (Table 2). An analysis of the raw data shows that for 1, 4-7, and 9, EC₅₀ against Vero cells is likely to be >200 µM. A more accurate assessment of these values was not possible due to low solubility of these compounds at high micromolar concentrations. To gain insights into the mechanism of VERO cell toxicity at high compound concentrations, the compounds were tested for inhibition of human cytoplasmic TrxR1 and GR. While none of the compounds show any appreciable inhibition of GR, TrxR1 IC₅₀ values varied from 4.9 to >50 µM (Table 1). Compound 6 is at least 25 times more potent against TGR than human TrxR1 indicating that selective enzyme inhibition is possible.

Table 2 Ex vivo characterization of 1–10, controls 11, 12, auranofin (AF), praziquantel (PZQ), and meclonazepam (MZM)

Full size table

TGR inhibitors are potent schistosomicidal agents ex vivo

Compounds in Table 1 were tested for schistosomicidal activity against S. mansoni and S. japonicum adult worms and S. mansoni NTS and 21-day juvenile worms ex vivo (Table 2). Schistosomicidal LD₅₀s against both species of adult worms were between 9.36 and 32.6 µM, juvenile worms 7.2 to >30 µM, and 0.6 µM to 17.5 µM against NTS, with most NTS LD₅₀ values below 6 µM. No differences in response were observed between male and female adult worms for any of the compounds tested. TGR inhibitors 1-6 were found to have higher potency against S. mansoni adult and NTS worm stages than PZQ and MZM, drugs with schistosomicidal activity. The PZQ LD₅₀ for NTS was determined after just 24 h exposure using both the Cell TiterGlo (27.1 ± 2.27 µM, Table 2) and the phenotypic analysis (42.9 ± 0.83 µM, Supplementary Movie 2), which is also used by others⁵⁴. If incubation with compounds is prolonged, superior efficacies can be reached: after 72 h exposure of NTS to compounds 1 and 6 had LD₅₀s of 2.2 ± 0.19 and 7.8 ± 2.36 µM respectively, whereas 2 had 0.18 ± 0.007 µM. In the assay with juvenile S. mansoni worms, TGR inhibitors 1-5 displayed potency comparable to that against adult worms and superior to PZQ and MZM, whereas LD₅₀ for 6-8, PZQ and MZM were all >30 µM. Potency of inhibitors 1-4, 7, and 8 against S. mansoni and S. japonicum adult worms was generally comparable.

Efflux may affect efficacy of TGR inhibitors ex vivo

Compounds 7-9 were found to have significant NTS killing activity, but the decrease in GSH/GSSG ratio was attenuated and less adult schistosomicidal activity was observed. Helminths are known to possess ABC/MDR transporters, P-glycoprotein, and other efflux transporters that mediate the transport of molecules and antimicrobials across the membrane modulating drug susceptibility⁵⁵. To enhance the level of uptake and retention, we coupled treatments of 7-9 with channel blockers in ex vivo worms. Treatment with combinations of channel blockers, tariquidar (10 μM) and Ko143 (10 μM), resulted in increased adult worm killing compared to treatments without channel blockers (Table 3). Likewise, significant decreases in GSH/GSSG ratio in combination treatments compared to TGR inhibitors alone were also seen. Treatment with the channel blockers alone or in combination with negative control 11 resulted in insignificant decrease of the GSH/GSSG ratio and no effect on adult worm viability.

Table 3 Biological activity of compounds 7–9 and 11 alone and with channel blockers tariquidar (T) and Ko143 (K) both at 10 µM

Full size table

TGR inhibitors have efficacy as schistosomicidal agents in vivo

Encouraged by the activity of our non-covalent TGR inhibitors against ex vivo worms, we evaluated the schistosomicidal activity of these compounds in mice infected with S. mansoni (Fig. 6). A single treatment of mice 42 days post infection (d.p.i.) with 1 (100 mg/kg i.p.) resulted in a 44% decrease in worm and a 40% reduction in egg burdens, respectively. Administration, at 42 d.p.i., of two doses of 1 (100 mg/kg i.p. bid) resulted in 54% and 48% decrease in worm and egg burdens, respectively. A single dose of 2 (100 mg/kg i.p.) at 42 d.p.i. resulted in a 85% decrease in worm burden and 73% decrease in egg burden. Decreased efficacy was observed when this dose was spread over two administrations (50 mg/kg i.p. at 42 d.p.i. and 50 mg/kg i.p. at 45 d.p.i.), resulting in a 43% decrease in worm burden and a 69% decrease in egg production. A single dose of 6 (100 mg/kg i.p.) at 42 d.p.i. resulted in a 34% decrease in worm and 3% decrease in egg burdens, respectively, while two doses (100 mg/kg i.p. at 42 d.p.i. and 100 mg/kg i.p. at 45 d.p.i.), did not result in increased efficacy (38% decrease in worm and 18% reduction in egg burdens, respectively). A single administration of 8 at 42 d.p.i (200 mg/kg i.p.) resulted in a 19% and 7% decrease in worm and egg burdens, respectively.

**Fig. 6: Schistosomicidal efficacy in mice.**

The three TGR inhibitors with significant in vivo efficacy (1, 2, and 6) against adult worms were tested for efficacy against juvenile worms 21 d.p.i. (Fig. 6). As shown in previous studies, PZQ has very little activity in this context¹³. Treatment with either compound 1 (2 ×100 mg/kg) or 2 (1 ×100 mg/kg) resulted in significant decreases in both worm and egg burdens of 61% and 57% for 2 and 28% and 31% for 1, respectively. Compound 6 exhibited only marginal efficacy of 16% and 7% decrease in worm and egg burdens, respectively. Thus, the greater efficacy of inhibitor 2 observed against adult worms, translated to the greater efficacy in mice against juvenile worms.

Pharmacokinetic (PK) studies

Administration of 1 (100 mg/kg i.p.) achieved a C_max of 4.1 μM at 30 min and maintained plasma concentrations >2 μM at 2 h post administration: 4.1, 3.3, and 2.4 μM at 30, 60, and 120 min (Supplementary Table 18). A similar PK profile was observed for inhibitor 2 (100 mg/kg i.p.), with 4.8, 3.9, and 3.0 μM concentrations measured at 30, 60, and 120 min, respectively. Plasma exposure of mice to both 1 and 2 is compatible with observed efficacy and no overt toxicity was observed. Based on the time points available, the half-lives of 1 and 2 can be estimated at 90 min. The TGR inhibitor demonstrating greatest efficacy in treating infected mice, 2, was also studied after oral administration: 2 (200 mg/kg p.o.) gave plasma concentrations of 0.71, 0.77, and 0.40 µM at 30, 60, and 120 min, respectively (Supplementary Table 19).

Non-covalent inhibitors of TrxR class of redox proteins may have broad application

One of our recently synthesized TGR inhibitors compound 10 with IC₅₀ = 18.6 μM for TGR is even more potent against TrxR from Brugia malayi (BmTrxR; IC₅₀ = 2.5 μM) and is a weak inhibitor of TrxR from Plasmodium falciparum (PfTrxR; IC₅₀ = 32.5 μM) (Table 1 and Supplementary Table 20). Both BmTrxR and PfTrxR are validated drug targets against lymphatic filariasis and malaria, respectively^56,57. These results and the differences in the composition of the doorstop pockets (Supplementary Fig. 27) suggest that selectivity for individual TrxRs can be attainable, which may result in lower toxicity.

Discussion

We have identified compounds (1-10) that act as non-covalent inhibitors of TGR with druglike properties as demonstrated by efficacy in mice infected with S. mansoni. Inhibition of TGR was shown in biochemical assays with recombinant protein, and in ex vivo worms by measurement of both TGR-generated fluorescent products from TRFS-Green and the decrease in the GSH/GSSG ratio. Herein, we demonstrate that single particle cryo-EM can be applied to a member of the pyridine nucleotide-disulfide oxidoreductase protein family, which includes crucial drug targets for several human diseases. The cryo-EM data show inhibitor 9 bound in the doorstop pocket, indicating that the design strategy, based on the initial fragments found in X-ray co-crystal structures, is successful. We propose that this class of inhibitors trap the NADP⁺-TGR(H) species, preventing NADP⁺ release. The evidence is provided by: (i) the inhibitors are found in the secondary site known to interact with outgoing NADP⁺ in related pyridine nucleotide–disulfide oxidoreductases;⁵³ (ii) inhibition is reversible; and (iii) inhibition is exerted by binding to the NADP⁺-TGR(H) reduced species. One advantage of noncompetitive and uncompetitive inhibitors over competitive inhibitors in disruption of metabolic pathways, is the lack of competition with endogenous substrates that may be present at high cellular concentrations as a result of enzyme inhibition, making uncompetitive inhibitors, in particular, ideal for drug development⁵⁸.

All lines of evidence indicate that fast and slow TGR inhibitors bind different conformational states present in the TGR enzymatic cycle induced by both NADPH-dependent reduction and the concomitant destabilization of the polypeptide chain, as shown by TSA. We hypothesize that (i) the slow inhibition observed in the biochemical assay with the recombinant protein with some of the compounds is due to their preferential binding to a slowly populated conformer of the NADP⁺-TGR(H) complex and (ii) this conformer is already populated in the worm cell interior accounting for the more rapid inhibition of TGR observed in ex vivo worms with the slow inhibitors. To the best of our knowledge, the assays where DTNB, GSSG, Trx, and NADPH (at saturating concentrations) are utilized as substrates are the only assays used to measure activity of TGR and related enzymes, including human TrxR and GR⁵⁹. Considering that very little is known about the local and temporal concentrations of NADPH and TGR and the multiple redox-associated conformational states, it is difficult to assess how accurately the biochemical assay with recombinant TGR models the inhibition of TGR in worms ex vivo or in vivo. A comprehensive characterization of enzyme inhibition by slow inhibitors, which are well documented in the literature⁵⁸, is not straightforward. Hence, it certainly appears that measurements in worms ex vivo of GSH/GSSG ratio and fluorescent product from TRFS-Green are more reliable in assessing endogenous inhibition of TGR. The observed inhibition of GSSG reduction likely leads to redox stress resulting in the potent schistosomicidal activity observed. Despite similarity, TrxR and TGR proteins appear to be sufficiently different, as evidenced by the differential activity of our inhibitors against TGR and human, B. malayi, and P. falciparum TrxRs, and inhibitors selective for individual enzymes could be developed. Human TrxR1 (the cytosolic isoform) displays 74% sequence identity in the doorstop pocket residues with respect to TGR. Remarkably, the charge distribution and shape of TrxR1 in this site is different with respect to TGR³³ due to the presence of charged and bulky residues, i.e., E337, D338, E341, E368 and K389 in human TrxR1 in place of A436, G437, Q440, S467 and D488 in TGR. These structural differences suggest that selective inhibition of TGR over human TrxR may be attainable. Indeed, compound 6 has IC₅₀ = 2.5 µM against TGR and against human TrxR1 it is > 66.7 µM, at least 25 times more potent against TGR than human TrxR1. Human Trx and GSH systems have compensatory activities so that inhibition of one arm can be supplemented by the other⁶⁰, suggesting that the inhibition of hTrxR by some of the compounds presented here will not be detrimental for humans as it is for schistosomes. Better understanding of the mechanism and TGR/TrxR reduced species involved in the binding of inhibitors depending on microenvironment may offer an additional avenue to control inhibitor selectivity in organism, tissue, and cell type specific manner.

The TGR inhibitors, reported herein, are schistosomicidal both ex vivo and in vivo. These inhibitors outperform PZQ, the drug of choice to fight schistosomiasis. Disease eradication using PZQ monotherapy is severely limited by the low activity of this drug against juvenile worms. Against ex vivo S. mansoni juvenile worms, the LD₅₀ of PZQ (413 µM) is inferior to that of inhibitors 1-5 (7.2 < LD₅₀ < 26 µM)⁶¹. Under the assay conditions used herein (ex vivo worm viability assessed after 24 h exposure), all compounds had equal or superior potency to PZQ and all, except 9, were more active than MZM against S. mansoni adult worms and NTS (Table 2). The reported LD₅₀ for NTS after exposure to PZQ for 3 days is 1–2 µM⁶². After 3-days exposure of NTS, the LD₅₀ of compound 1 was similar to that of PZQ, whereas 2 was 5-fold more potent than PZQ. In other studies, the LD₅₀ for PZQ against adult worms has been reported as 1.5 µM and 5.1 µM for male and female worms, respectively;⁶¹ however, these LD₅₀s were determined after overnight exposure to PZQ followed by 8 days culture. Our comparison of PZQ activity against NTS in the phenotypic and Cell Titer Glo assays found similar LD₅₀s immediately after 24 h exposure. The compounds presented herein have similar activities against both S. mansoni and S. japonicum adult worms and show no differences between male and female parasites. The similar effect observed against S. japonicum can be rationalized by the 100% homology of the residues in the doorstop pocket of TGR from the two species (Supplementary Fig. 27). The complete reliance of all schistosome species¹⁵ on TGR for regulation of the redox defense network, and our previous results with several covalent TGR inhibitors^19,20, are compatible with species and sex concordance. Although some inhibitors (7-9), on the basis of adult schistosomicidal activity in combination with efflux transport blockers, appear to be substrates for efflux pumps, this does not cause species nor sex differences.

When targeting adult worms in mice, administration of inhibitors 1, 2, and 6, resulted in significant reductions in both worm and egg burdens. Treatment with a single dose of compound 2 (100 mg/kg) resulted in an 85% reduction in adult worm burdens. The WHO criterion for lead progression is ≥80% reduction in worm burden after five doses (100 mg/kg qd) over multiple days⁶³. This criterion is somewhat at odds with the current SOP for MDA, which does not entertain multiple doses over multiple days²⁷. Compound 2 is therefore a viable development lead for treatment of schistosome infection. Earlier studies found that the ED₅₀ for PZQ against adult worms in mice was 80 mg/kg;⁶¹ the activity for 2 reported here of 85% reduction at 100 mg/kg indicates similar activity. Targeting juvenile worms at 21 d.p.i. with a single injection of 2 (100 mg/kg) resulted in >60% reduction in worm burden, a significantly higher efficacy than observed for treatment with PZQ in previous studies¹³, which had 0% reduction at 21 and 28 d.p.i. (500 mg/kg) and reductions of 50 % and 17% at 21 and 28 d.p.i. (1,000 mg/kg), respectively. Titrating PZQ doses 28 d.p.i. resulted in ED₅₀ = 2,456 mg/kg⁶¹. Based on the single dose tested for 2, the estimated ED₅₀ is below 100 mg/kg. Comparing the schistosomicidal activity against juvenile worms with that of PZQ reported in previous in vivo studies⁶¹, the inhibitors reported herein show superior schistosomicidal activity to PZQ at the worm developmental stage in mice. Overall, treatment targeting juvenile worms resulted in smaller decreases in worm and egg burdens, which could be associated with higher ABC and MDR transporter activity in juvenile worms than adult worms⁵⁵.

The maximum plasma concentration (C_max) reached for a standard dose of PZQ (1,500 mg), in healthy volunteers, is 0.16 μg/ml or 513 nM⁶⁴. The PZQ plasma exposure, measured by C_max, is substantially lower than the LD₅₀ against adult worms and NTS reported by others^61,62, and substantially below the LD₅₀ for NTS killing measured herein (27–43 µM). The half-life of PZQ in healthy volunteers (1.6 h)⁶⁴ is also much shorter than the 3-8 days assays used by others to determine LD₅₀ for worms and NTS ex vivo. Discordance between ex vivo potency and in vivo PK/PD has many potential causes, one of which, in the case of schistosomicidal agents, is the involvement of the host immune response. The schistosomicidal activities of PZQ and of potassium antimonial tartrate, a drug used in the past for schistosomiasis and a TGR inhibitor, are reduced in immunosuppressed mice⁶⁵, indicating a crucial role of the host immune system in the mechanism of action of schistosomicidal agents in vivo. There is every reason to argue that the efficacy observed for compounds 1 and 2 in vivo incorporates a similar role for the host immune response as seen for other schistosomicidal agents. It is therefore unsurprising that the LD₅₀ values for compounds 1 and 2 determined ex vivo have a similar discordance to that seen for PZQ when considering in vivo PK/PD: much like PZQ these compounds are schistosomicidal in vivo at sub LD₅₀ concentrations. Although the maximum plasma concentration is lower when compound 2 is administered PO (0.77 µM) instead of IP (4.8 µM), it is still 4.3-fold higher than LD₅₀ for ex vivo NTS determined in the commonly used 72 h assay, also indicating that TGR inhibitor 2 is orally bioavailable and the initial prediction of oral bioavailability based on the Lipinski et al.⁴¹ criteria is correct. The observation that higher plasma concentrations of 2 can be achieved after oral delivery than for PZQ, coupled with the greater ex vivo potency of compound 2, strongly suggest that further optimization will yield an orally bioavailable schistosomicidal agent that will be transformative in the clinical setting. Inhibitors reported herein are effective against all stages of schistosome development, decrease egg production, improve liver pathology, and are orally bioavailable.

All parasitic flatworms have a redox system similar to that of S. mansoni with TGR serving an obligate role in the absence of TrxR and GR; therefore, our therapeutic approach can be extended to other human and veterinary flatworms⁶⁶. Given the mechanism of enzyme inhibition, our non-covalent inhibitors can be targeted to TrxR and can be applicable to development of therapeutics for a broad range of diseases. All TrxR enzymes require an NADPH-dependent reduction step to exert their function in vivo and TrxR is a therapeutic target for cancer and infectious diseases^21,67. Several currently used cancer drugs exert their anticancer activity in part through covalent inhibition of TrxR²¹ and two covalent TrxR inhibitors are currently in clinical trials⁶⁸. TrxRs from filarial nematodes and malaria parasites have been validated as druggable^56,57 and have structures available^69,70. The druglike and orally bioavailable compounds identified herein are active in animal models of schistosomiasis with a broader range of developmental stages targeted than the drug of choice, PZQ. Their mechanism of action is different from that of PZQ and combinations of PZQ and TGR inhibitors represent a promising approach to develop combination therapies essential for schistosomiasis elimination.

Methods

Computer-aided molecular design, synthesis, and characterization

All the computer-aided molecular design studies were performed in SZMAP/GamePlan³⁷ and vBrood³⁸ modules in OpenEye software and Molecular Operating Environment, MOE³⁹. The 3D structures of TGR in biological assembly (i.e., dimers) PDB:6FP4 and PDB:6FTC were downloaded from PDB. The proteins were subjected to the Structure Preparation procedure followed by addition of hydrogen atoms using the Protonate 3D application⁷¹ with all the default settings in MOE. The energy of the resulting structure was minimized utilizing AMBER14:EHT forcefield in MOE^72,73 with all the settings set default until the RMS gradient reached 0.001 kcal/mol/ Å². The resulting ligand-proteins complexes were aligned to match the position of the co-crystallized small molecule fragments. At this step, the water molecules found in the X-ray structures were removed. The co-crystallized fragments found in sub-pockets A-C and the protein were used as input for the SZMAP, Gameplan, and vBrood applications and visualization in MOE. To facilitate the calculations and analysis, an artificial chimera molecule was built using the X-ray fragments found in subpockets A-C in PDB:6FP4 and PDB:6FTC and connected by a short CH₂CH₂ linker. The resulting complex was additionally minimized as described above. The default settings for the SZMAP and Gameplan applications were used in all the calculations. SZMAP was used for analysis of energetics of stabilizing and destabilizing effects of water. The szmap command with keyword -stbl resulted in complex, apo, and ligand grids. Additional grids were generated using -results_set max keyword. To break-out the region displaced by the ligand, the grid_comp command was run on the results of the previous step. WaterColor and WaterOrientation VIDA extensions were applied to the results of SZMAP calculations to visualize the regions that favor polar and non-polar substituents. The water probes position, orientation, and energetics were determined for the chimera-TGR complex. The −1.5 kcal/mol and 0.75 kcal/mol cutoffs were used for the lower and upper cutoffs in the “Exclude free energy range” settings, the water molecules were visualized by energy. The grid point pruning was set to “more”. The positions of the probes and the free energy values were exported in a PDB file and visualized in Pymol⁷⁴. The S. mansoni X-ray structures of TGR 2X99, 2X8G, 2X8H⁷⁵, 6FP4, 6FTC³³, 6ZST, 6ZP3, 6ZLP, 6FMU, 6ZLB, 7B02, 7NPX³⁴, 2V6O⁷⁵,6RTJ, 6RTO, 6RTM³⁶, 3H4K⁷⁶ were downloaded from PDB, aligned in MOE, water molecules in the doorstop pocket were extracted and saved for visualization in Pymol. The same color scheme was used to visualize the water probes. Gameplan was used to generate a set of hypotheses for polar and non-polar ligand modifications. All the settings in Gameplan were set default. The fragment library for the vBrood application was prepared using the CHOMP application to fragment the ChEMBL database⁷⁷ version CHEMBL25⁷⁸. In the CHOMP application, no additional parameters were used except for the minimal required to run it (i.e. -in and -out). The total number of fragments in the resulting database was 17,697,078. vBrood was run to replace the piperazine portion of the molecule using the default settings in vBrood.

The synthesis and characterization of compounds 1–12 and PRP are given in Supplementary Methods, Supplementary Figs. 1–20, and Supplementary Tables 1–14.

Photolabeling of TGR with PRP

TGR (1 µM) or SmHDAC8 (1 µM) was incubated at concentrations of either 5 or 50 µM PRP with or without 100 µM NADPH totaling eight samples. The photocrosslinking and CuAAC click biotinylation were performed as previously described by our group⁵². After resolving samples on SDS-PAGE and nitrocellulose membrane transfer, western blot normalization was performed with the Licor Revert™ 700 Total Protein Stain Kit as described in their protocol. Protein was finally imaged with the Licor IRDye® 800CW streptavidin on the Odyssey Sa imager.

Enzyme inhibition, kinetics, ex vivo and in vivo activity

Enzyme preparation and activity determination

Recombinant TGR, human TrxR1, B. malayi (Bm)TrxR and human GR proteins were expressed and purified as described^20,69,79. The codon optimized sequence for P. falciparum (PfTrxR, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/protein/CAA60574.1/) with an N-terminal 6-His tag was synthesized and inserted into pET15b (GenScript) and expressed in BL21 (DE3) cells and purified as described for human GR²⁰. TGR and TrxR enzyme inhibition assays were performed in triplicate at 25 °C as described²⁰ in 0.1 M potassium phosphate (pH 7.4), 10 mM EDTA, 100 µM NADPH and 0.01% Tween-20. TGR, human TrxR1 and BmTrxR (all at 4 nM) and PfTrxR (50 nM) were preincubated with the compounds for 15 min. The reaction was started with addition of an equal volume of DTNB (6 mM) and NADPH (100 µM) and the increase in A₄₁₂ during the first 3 min was recorded. To determine inhibition of GR, GR (120 pM) was added to an assay mixture (100 μM NADPH, 0.1 M potassium phosphate (pH 6.9), 200 mM KCl, and 1 mM EDTA). The reaction was preincubated for 15 min. Activity was initiated with the addition of 1 mM GSSG and 100 μM NADPH and initial rates of NADPH oxidation were monitored at 340 nm. The reactions were done in triplicate. The IC₅₀ was calculated in GraphPad Prism.

Thermal shift assay (TSA)

Samples were prepared by using a final concentration of 0.25 mg/ml TGR diluted in TGR reaction buffer to the desired volume. To evaluate reduced TGR, 500 µM NADPH was added. Inhibitors were added at a concentration dependent on the compound’s IC₅₀, from 125–500 µM. The mixtures containing inhibitors 1-5 were incubated for 6 h and for 30 min for treatments with 6-8 at room temperature. After the preincubation period, 20 µL samples were pipetted into a BioRad un-skirted PCR 96 well plate and sealed with MicroAmp^TM Optical Adhesive film. The plate was then centrifuged for 5 min at 1000 × g. TSA was carried out using a BioRad CFX Connect qPCR instrument with a melt curve setting of 25 − 95 °C, in increments of 0.5 °C/10 seconds. The SYBR green channel was used to detect fluorescence as the wavelength of flavin fluorescence overlaps with that of SYBR green. BioRad CFX Maestro 5.2 was used to analyze TSA data.

NADPH dependence of inhibition

TGR was incubated at room temperature with inhibitor in the presence or absence of 100 µM NADPH for 15 min. DTNB (3 mM) and NADPH (100 µM) were added, and the reaction was monitored at A₄₁₂ for 5 min to determine reaction rate. The assay was done in triplicate.

Time dependence of inhibition

TGR was incubated at room temperature (up to 6 h) and at 4 °C for 6 to 24 h with 50 µM inhibitor and 100 µM NADPH for the indicated times. Then DTNB (3 mM) and NADPH (100 µM) were added, and the reaction was monitored at A₄₁₂ for 5 min. The assay was done in triplicate.

Reversibility by jump dilution

A reaction of 370 nM TGR, 100 µM NADPH, and 250 µM inhibitor was incubated for 15 min at room temperature. A 100x dilution of the reaction was made and the activity was determined immediately and after 60 min. The inhibition of 3.7 nM TGR with 250 µM inhibitor, 100 µM NADPH, and a 15 min pre-incubation at RT was measured to compare to the inhibition after the jump dilution.

NADPH competition

Master mixes with varying concentrations of NADPH were made, each with 2 nM TGR in reaction buffer. Inhibitor (2 µl) was added to a 96 well microplate in triplicate for each NADPH and inhibitor concentration, and 192 µl of the master buffer was added to each well. The reaction incubated for 15 min and 6 µl of 50 mM DTNB was added to each well. The kinetic rate was measured at A₄₁₂ for 5 min.

Superoxide production

The production of superoxide by TGR was determined by monitoring reaction of superoxide with pyrogallol red⁸⁰. Briefly, a 1 ml reaction mix (500 nM TGR, 100 µM NADPH, and 20–50 µM inhibitor) was incubated at room temperature for 30 min for fast inhibitors, or 2 h for slow inhibitors. For irreversible inhibitor controls TRi-1 (synthesized in house as reported⁴⁵), Stattic (Cayman Chemical), and AF (Cayman Chemical), the samples were desalted using a Zeba spin desalting column. 100 µL of sample was combined with pyrogallol buffer with and without superoxide dismutase (SOD) (50 µM pyrogallol red, 300 µM NADPH; ± 10 units SOD). The reaction was measured at A₃₄₀ and A₅₄₀ simultaneously for 2 h.

NADPH consumption

TRi-1, Stattic (both at 50 µM) and AF (20 µM) were incubated with 1 ml of 500 nM TGR and 100 µM NADPH in TGR reaction buffer for 30 min. The samples were desalted using a Zeba spin desalting column (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and 100 µl of the desalted sample was combined with 100 µl of 100 µM NADPH. NADPH consumption was monitored at 340 nm in triplicate. Compounds 1, 4, 6, and 7 (50 µM) were tested in the same fashion without the desalting step and with a first incubation step of 30 min for 6 and 7 and 2 h for 1 and 4.

Evaluation of schistosomicidal activity

Preparation of NTS

Oncomelania hupensis subsp. hupensis, Chinese strain, infected with S. japonicum, Chinese strain, and Biomphalaria glabrata, strain NMRI, infected with S. mansoni, strain NMRI, were provided by the NIAID Schistosomiasis Resource Center for distribution through BEI Resources, NIAID, NIH. After infections were patent, snails were exposed to bright light for 1 hr to obtain cercariae. Cercariae were mechanically transformed to schistosomula⁵⁴. Briefly, cercariae were placed on ice for 30 min and then centrifuged at 350 × g for 10 mins. The supernatant was decanted and 2 ml of serum-free M199 medium was added to cercarial pellets and vortexed for 1 min until cercarial tails were detached. NTS were purified by layering on 4 °C Percoll gradient suspension containing Eagle’s minimum essential medium, penicillin-streptomycin (10,000 U per ml penicillin/10,000 U per ml streptomycin), and 1 M HEPES in 0.85% NaCl with cercariae suspension and centrifuged at 500 × g for 15 min. Cercarial pellets were resuspended and washed thrice in serum-free M199 medium and collected at 100 × g for 5 min. NTS (240) were transferred to U-bottom 96 well assay plates containing 200 µl of M199 medium supplemented with 5.5 mM D-glucose, penicillin-streptomycin and 5% heat inactivated fetal bovine serum and incubated at 37 °C in a 5% CO₂ incubator overnight.

Preparation of juvenile and adult worms

All animal studies at Rush University Medical Center were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of the Rush University Medical Center (Department of Health and Human Services animal welfare assurance number A-3120 − 01) with protocol ID: 20-069. Three-week old, female Swiss-Webster mice obtained from the Charles River were housed in the Comparative Research Center of Rush University Medical Center. Mice were infected by percutaneous tail exposure to about 200 S. mansoni or 50 S. japonicum cercaria for adult worms and about 1000 cercaria for juvenile S. mansoni worms through natural transdermal penetration of the cercariae for 1 h⁸¹. Mice were euthanized three-and seven-weeks post infection for juvenile and adult worms, respectively, using a lethal dose of 0.018 ml of Euthasol and 5.85 mg/ml heparin to prevent blood coagulation (injection volume of 400 µl). Perfusion was performed by flushing pre-warmed RPMI containing phenol red and L-glutamine through a 25- and 3/8-gauge needle placed into the aorta attached to Tygon tubing aided by the Masterflex L/S perfusion pump as described⁸¹. Juvenile and adult worms were carefully washed in phenol red free RPMI medium and subsequently incubated in phenol red free RPMI medium supplemented with 5.5 mM D-glucose, penicillin-streptomycin and 5% heat inactivated fetal bovine serum and at 37 °C in a 5% CO₂ incubator overnight.

Schistosomicidal activity of compounds against NTS, juvenile and adult worms

DMSO formulated compounds were diluted with phenol red free M199 medium or RPMI medium for NTS or juvenile and adult worms, respectively, at <1% DMSO final concentrations. NTS, juvenile and adult worms from overnight cultures were tested against compounds in triplicate. Controls were treated with DMSO alone or 5 µM AF as a positive control in appropriate medium¹⁸. Worm viability was assessed at 24 or 72 h by measuring ATP content of worms using Cell Titer Glo Assay (Promega) as described⁸². Schistosome viabilities in the presence of the compounds were assessed using this formula: % Viability = Averages of Test / Averages of DMSO Control x 100.

Channel blockers enhanced schistosomicidal activity of compounds

To assess the involvement of efflux pumps in the diminished schistosomicidal activity observed in selected compounds (7-9) against S. mansoni adult worms, we treated adult worms with these compounds in the presence of channel blockers Tariquidar (T, 10 μM, Cayman Chemical) and Ko143 (K, 10 μM, Cayman Chemical) as described above.

Phenotypic assessment of PZQ activity on NTS

About 200 NTS incubated at 37 °C in a 5% CO₂ incubator overnight were exposed to different concentrations of PZQ (1, 5, 10, 20, 30, 40 and 50 µM) and control without treatment for 24 h in triplicate. Worm images were acquired using Keyence BZ-X800 microscope and PZQ activity evaluated phenotypically⁶². NTS viability was assessed by scoring worms based on morphological changes and motility. Viability scores of 3 = motile, no changes to morphology and transparency, 2 = reduced motility and/or some damage to tegument as well as reduced transparency and increased granularity, 1 = severe reduction of motility and/or damage to tegument with high opacity and high granularity, and 0 = dead. The effect of PZQ on NTS was determined using the formula % Effect = 100 – (Average (Test) x 100 / Average (Control)) and LD₅₀ determined in GraphPad Prism.

Cytotoxicity in mammalian cells

Vero cells (African Green Monkey Kidney cells, ATCC CCL-81) were grown in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM) containing glucose, L-glutamine and sodium pyruvate and supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum and 1X penicillin–streptomycin (Sigma) at 37 °C in culture flasks (TPT-90025) until confluent growth was attained. Vero cells were detached from the flasks by treatment with trypsin (0.5 mg/ml)/EDTA (0.2 mg/ml) in PBS for 5 min at 37 °C. Detached cells were suspended in the modified DMEM medium and seeded at 10⁴ cells/well in 96-well microtiter plates (Costar, Corning) and incubated in the presence of 5% CO₂ at 37 °C for 24 h. Following overnight incubation, formulated DMSO-compound stock solutions were diluted with DMEM at <1% DMSO final concentrations. Vero cells were treated with different concentrations of compounds with DMSO as control and incubated in the presence of 5% CO₂ at 37 °C for 24 h. Vero cells treated similarly with different concentrations of PZQ, MZM and AF (Cayman Chemicals) were used as positive controls. Vero cell viability was assessed at 24 h by measuring ATP content using Cell Titer Glo Assay as described⁸³.

Assessment of schistosomicidal activity in mice

To assess the efficacy of the compounds in vivo against juvenile and adult worms, five female Swiss-Webster mice were randomly assigned for the control and experiment groups using a randomization tool embedded in GraphPad Prism. Mice were percutaneously exposed for 1 h to about 80 S. mansoni cercariae. Three- and six-weeks post infection, respectively, for juvenile and adult worms, mice were treated depending on their weight with formulations of the compounds, while the control mice received only the vehicle. Compounds were formulated with 10% DMSO and 10% Tween-80, and vortexed to obtain a uniform mixture. The mixture was sonicated twice for 5 min each time using a digital ultrasonic cleaner heated to 50 °C. Sodium chloride 0.9% (80% normal saline) was added to the mixture, briefly vortexed and sonicated one more time using the same conditions as previous. The investigators were blinded by which group of mice received a treatment and the vehicle, as injection was done by technicians from the Comparative Research Center of Rush University Medical Center. Using a 26 G, 3/8 in intradermal bevel needle, each mouse was administered intraperitoneally with 100 µl of the formulated compound suspension at 50 mg/kg, 100 mg/kg and 200 mg/kg. Mice treated three weeks post infection for juvenile worms were euthanized three weeks post treatment and mice treated six weeks post infection were euthanized one week post treatment with 0.018 ml of Euthasol and 5.85 mg/ml heparin and perfused⁸¹. The mesenteric and hepatic portal veins of the mice were carefully scanned under the microscope to extract any remaining S. mansoni adult worms and worm burdens were determined. Egg burden was determined by weighing 50 mg of liver tissue from each of treated and control mice. The liver tissues were digested with 5% KOH at 37 °C overnight and washed twice with PBS. The number of eggs per 50 mg of liver tissue was determined using a Keyence BZ-X800 microscope using the egg autofluorescence⁸⁴.

TGR inhibition in worms: TRFS-Green fluorescence quantification and GSH/GSSG determination

TGR inhibition in NTS was assessed using a fluorescent probe TRFS-Green (Medchemexpress)⁴³. NTS prepared as previously described and cultured in M199 supplemented with 5.5 mM D-glucose, penicillin-streptomycin and 5% heat inactivated fetal bovine serum were incubated at 37 °C in a clear bottom flat well plate in a 5% CO₂ incubator overnight. To inhibit TGR activity, NTS were treated with compounds (30 µM) or auranofin (5 µM) for 2 h. NTS were further treated with TRFS-Green (10 µM) for additional 4 h and rinsed with M199 medium to remove residual TRFS-Green. Fluorescence images were obtained using Keyence BZ-X800. The quantification of fluorescence intensity upon the uptake of TRFS-Green by NTS was performed by a fluorescent microplate imager (BioTek Cytation3) (excitation, 438 nm; emission, 538 nm) hourly for 5 h and after 24 h.

We assessed GSH/GSSG levels experimentally by treating S. mansoni adult worms with 50 µM of compounds, or respective controls 5 µM Auranofin, 50 µM PZQ or 50 µM MZM and 0.01% DMSO for 3 h. Worm homogenate was prepared by washing three times with PBS to remove residual compounds and ten volumes of ice cold 5% sulfosalicylic acid was added. Worms were manually homogenized on ice using VWR Pellet Mixer Adaptor. The worm suspension was centrifuged at 14000 × g, 4 °C for 10 min and the acid supernatants transferred. An equal volume of ice-cold neutralization buffer (500 mM HEPES, pH 8.0) was added to the acid supernatants.

GSH/GSSG assay was performed by diluting the acid supernatant (5-fold) with ice-cold dilution buffer (250 mM HEPES, pH 7.5). Using white opaque luminescence plate on ice, 25 µl of the diluted worm acid supernatant was added each well in triplicates. Total glutathione lysis reagent and GSSG lysis reagent, which contains alkylating agent N-ethylmaleimide (25 mM) were prepared following manufactures protocol and added to respective wells along with blank for background. Total glutathione lysis reagent or oxidized glutathione lysis reagent (25 µl) was added to respective wells containing worm acid supernatants and the plate was shaken for 5 min. Luciferin generation reagent (LGR) (50 µl) was added to all wells, briefly shaken and incubated at room temperature for 30 min. Luciferin detection reagent (LDR) (100 µl) was added to all wells, briefly shaken and incubated for 15 min at room temperature and the luminescence measured using microplate imager (BioTek Cytation3). GSH/GSSH ratio for DMSO control and compounds were calculated using (Net DMSO total glutathione RFU) – (Net DMSO GSSG RFU)/ (Net DMSO GSSG RFU)/2 and (Net inhibitor total glutathione RFU) – (Net inhibitor GSSG RFU)/ (Net inhibitor GSSG RFU)/2 respectively.

Pharmacokinetics of 1 and 2 in vivo: intraperitoneal administration

Chemicals and reagents

HPLC-grade water was prepared by an in-house PURELAB Option filtration system (Elga lab water solution, UK). All reagents and solvents used were of HPLC grade. Methanol (VWR Chemicals), formic acid (Sigma-Aldrich, West Chester, PA, USA) & DMSO Sigma-Aldrich (West Chester, PA, USA), NADPH (Merk, USA).

Animals

Swiss Webster male mice were purchased from Charles River Laboratories (Wilmington, MA, US). At 6 weeks of age, mice were housed in plastic cages and received standard chow (AIN-76) and water ad libitum prior to experiment maintained on a 12 h/12 h light/dark cycle. All the mice were weighed and dosed intraperitoneally accordingly at 100 mg/kg body weight with freshly prepared 1 or 2.

Blood was collected by submandibular puncture into 1 mL Eppendorf tubes, the plasma was separated and stored in −80 °C until used. A 25 µl of mouse plasma was transferred into 1.5 ml centrifuge tube which was spiked with 2.5 µl of internal standard (IS) working standard solution (100 µg/ml) to get final IS contraction of 250 ng/ml and the solution was vortexed. An aliquot of 75 µl of methanol/0.15 formic acid was added and gently vortexed for 2 min. The samples then centrifuged for 20 min at 4 °C and 15000 × g. A clear supernatant (50 µl) with added 50 µl mobile phase (reconstitution solution) from each extraction was then transferred into a 250 µl autosampler vial. A 3 µl aliquot of each sample was injected for LC-MSMS analysis.

Animal experiments were performed according to the policies and guidelines of the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) of the University of Illinois at Chicago (Protocol 19-049).

LC-MS/MS conditions

The analyte molecules were eluted on Zorbax XDB-C18 column (3.5 μm, 2.1x20 mm) with the mobile phase composed of water/0.1% formic acid and methanol/0.1% formic acid in the ratio of 70:30 V/V with the flow rate of 0.2 ml/min. The total run time of 2 min with an injection volume of 3 μl at column temperature 40 °C were efficient to achieve accepted results.

A Shimadzu LC20AD, Ultra Performance Liquid Chromatography (UPLC) system (Shimadzu Corporation, Kyoto, Japan) equipped with Shimadzu 8040 triple quadrupole (QqQ) mass analyzer (Shimadzu Corporation, Kyoto, Japan) with an electrospray ionization source (ESI) operated in the positive charge mode for the quantification of 1 and 2.

Instrument control and data acquisition was achieved via LabSolutioFns software (Shimadzu Corporation, Kyoto, Japan).

Pharmacokinetics of 2 in vivo: oral gavage

Chemicals and reagents

HPLC-grade water was prepared by an in-house PURELAB Option filtration system (Elga lab water solution, UK). All reagents and solvents used were of HPLC grade. Methanol (VWR Chemicals), formic acid (Sigma-Aldrich, West Chester, PA, USA) & DMSO Sigma-Aldrich (West Chester, PA, USA), NADPH (Merk, USA).

Animals

Compound 2 was dissolved in DMSO. Tween 80 and saline were then added to the DMSO solution in that order. Final solution was 10% DMSO:10% Tween 80:80% saline.

Swiss Webster female mice were purchased from Charles River Laboratories (Wilmington, MA, USA). At 6 weeks of age, mice were housed in plastic cages and received standard chow (AIN-76) and water ad libitum prior to experiment maintained on a 12 h/12 h light/dark cycle. All the mice were weighed and gavaged orally at 200 mg/kg body weight with freshly prepared 2. Blood was collected by submandibular puncture at 0, 0.25, 0.5, 1, and 2 h.

Animal experiments were performed according to the policies and guidelines of the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) of the University of Illinois at Chicago (Protocol 19-049).

Analytical standard preparation

The multiplexed working standards were prepared by dilution from stock solutions in methanol at concentrations from 2.5 ng/ml – 2000 ng/ml. The working internal standards were also diluted from stock solutions in methanol with 0.1% formic acid. The working concentration of internal standard compound 1 was 750 ng/ml.

Sample preparation

Calibration curve for 2 was prepared by spiking 40 µl of blank mouse plasma with 10 µl of working standard solution to get final concentration ranging from 2.5 ng/ml – 2000 ng/ml. Samples were deproteinized with 150 µl of internal standard solution. This mixture was vortexed to mix properly and centrifuged at 13000 × g for 30 min. 160 µl of the supernatant was transferred to another set of tubes and dried using a nitrogen evaporator. Samples were reconstituted in 100 µl of methanol, vortexed and centrifuged at 13000 × g for 20 min. 30 µl of supernatant was transferred to autosampler vials.

LC-MS/MS conditions

Experiments were carried out on ThermoFisher Scientific Vanquish high-performance liquid chromatography connected to ThermoFisher Scientific TSQ Quantis – triple quadrupole mass spectrometer. The analyte molecules were separated on Phenomenex kinetex C18 column 100 Å (2.6 μm, 50 × 3 mm) with the mobile phase composed of Water/0.1% formic acid (A) and Acetonitrile (B) at the flow rate of 0.5 ml/min with the column temperature maintained at 40 °C and the sample of injection was 5 µl. The gradient program was set as follows: 0.1 min, 5% B; 0.1–0.5 min, 5–95% B; 0.5–2.5 min, 95% B; 2.5–3.5 min, 95–5%; 3.5–4 min and stop at 5 min.

Quantification was performed using electrospray in the positive mode with the spray voltage of 3500 V. Sheath gas (Arb) 20, Auxiliary gas (Arb) 8 and Sweep gas (Arb) 5.7. The ion transfer tube has a temperature of 325 °C and vaporizer temperature of 350 °C.

A Shimadzu LC20AD, Ultra Performance Liquid Chromatography (UPLC) system (Shimadzu Corporation, Kyoto, Japan) equipped with Shimadzu 8040 triple quadrupole (QqQ) mass analyzer (Shimadzu Corporation, Kyoto, Japan) with an electrospray ionization source (ESI) operated in the positive charge mode for the quantification of 2.

Instrument control and data acquisition was achieved via LabSolutions software (Shimadzu Corporation, Kyoto, Japan).

Evaluation of compound 2 stability under the biochemical assay conditions with recombinant TGR

TGR assay solutions (1 ml each) were prepared as described in the main manuscript. Compound 2, NADPH, and incubation time was varied as following: 1) TGR and 2, no preincubation, 2) TGR, 2, and NADPH, no preincubation, 3) TGR and 2, 15 min preincubation, 4) TGR, 2, and NADPH, 15 min preincubation, 5) TGR and NADPH followed by 15 min preincubation, 2 was added after 15 min preincubation, 6) TGR and 2 followed by 15 min preincubation, NADPH was added after 15 min preincubation. Each of the reaction mixtures were terminated by the addition of 250 µl of ethyl acetate, extracted with 1 ml of methyl tert-butyl ether. The organic layer was evaporated in vacuo, and the residue was redissolved in 0.5 mL of 50% MeOH before injection onto LC column. LC-MS analysis was done on a Waters SYNAPT quadrupole/time-of-flight mass spectrometer operated in positive ion electrospray mode. The column was Waters XBridge C8 column and gradient was from 20-90% MeCN/0.1% formic acid over 12 min. No additional ions except for those corresponding to 2 were detected.

Assessment of reactivity of 2 and TRi-1 with N-Boc protected methyl ester of L-selenocysteine

Dimethyl bis(N-tert-butoxycarbonyl)-L-selenocystine was synthesized as reported previously⁸⁵. (N-tert-butoxycarbonyl)-L-selenocysteine methyl ester was prepared in situ⁸⁶ in methanol or phosphate buffer. Compound 2 was added to the solution of (N-tert-butoxycarbonyl)-L-selenocysteine methyl ester in either methanol or phosphate buffer and incubated for 40 min, 24 h, and 120 h under N₂ gas balloon. Additional amounts of NaBH₄ were added at 12 h and 96 h to maintain the reducing conditions. Aliquots taken from methanol solution at each of the time points were concentrated in vacuo, mixed with water, and extracted with ethyl acetate. The organic layer was separated, concentrated in vacuo, re-dissolved in methanol and analyzed by LCMS. Aliquots taken from the phosphate buffer solution were extracted with ethyl acetate. The resulting organic layer was separated and concentrated in vacuo. The residue was re-dissolved in methanol and analyzed by LCMS. No additional peaks were detected either by UV or MS detection. No additional spots were detected by TLC as well.

Covalent TGR inhibitor TRi-1 was used as a positive control for the reaction with (N-tert-butoxycarbonyl)-L-selenocysteine methyl ester. The reactivity of TRi-1 was tested similarly as described above for compound 2. An adduct between TRi-1 was detected by TLC and LCMS analysis (Supplementary Fig. 22).

Cryo-EM methods

Negative staining transmission electron microscopy

The homogeneity of the protein before structural determination was assessed by negative staining electron microscopy. Around 4 µl of the mixture of 0.02 mg/ml TGR in 0.15% DMSO and 5 mM inhibitor was applied to home-made carbon film evaporated a mica film, which was floated off in about 200 µl of 2% sodium silicotungstate (SST) and recovered by a Cu grid. The stained sample was then air dried. The images were acquired on a Tecnai 12 (Thermo Fisher Scientific) LaB₆ electron microscope operating at 120 kV using a Gatan Orius 1000 CCD camera or on a Tecnai F20 (Thermo Fisher Scientific) FEG electron microscope operating at 200 kV using a Ceta CMOS camera (Thermo Fisher Scientific).

Cryogenic electron microscopy

The specimens for cryogenic electron microscopy (Cryo-EM) have been prepared onto 300 mesh Ultrafoil Au R1.2/1.3 grids (Quantifoil Micro Tools GmbH, Germany). First, 0.4 mg/ml TGR protein was mixed with 5 mM of inhibitor 9 in buffer solution containing 0.15% DMSO and incubated 30 min at room temperature (20 °C). Then, 3.5 µl of the sample was applied onto 45 s glow-discharged quantifoil grids and vitrified in liquid ethane using a Vitrobot Mark IV (ThermoFisher Scientific) at 100% humidity, 7 s blotting time and 10 s waiting time. A total number of 2635 raw movie stacks made of 50 frames each were collected with SerialEM⁸⁷ from a single individual session with a GLACIOS 200 kV FEG Cryo-TEM (ThermoFisher Scientific) using a K2 Summit detector (Gatan Inc., USA) at 36000× magnification and pixel size of 1.145 Å/pixel without pre-exposure and using a defocus of –2.6 to –1.8 µm and 50 e^-/Å² total dose per stack (1 e^-/Å² per frame). Single-particle structure determination has been carried out with Relion v3.1.2⁸⁸ after motion-correction using 5 × 5 patches⁸⁹ and CTF estimation⁹⁰. About 10000 particles were picked using a Laplacian-of-Gaussian approach to build 2D templates from eleven selected motion-corrected micrographs for further template-based picking to reach more than 1.7 × 10⁶ particles. After extraction with 2-fold binning (216 to 108 pixels), 2D classification was used to eliminate wrongly picked particles. An initial 3D model was built in Relion with both C1 and C2 symmetry and used for subsequent 3D classifications and refinements. All classes obtained after 3D classification and refinement showed the best results in terms of overall resolution and appearance of electron density. The final rounds of 3D classification and 3D refinement were performed using a larger box size (300 pixels) without binning along with CTF refinements and particle polishing. The final 3D map has an average resolution of 3.6 Å at FSC = 0.143. The crystal structure of TGR (PDB ID: 2V6O)³² was docked manually in the cryo-EM map using COOT^91,90. Map local anisotropic sharpening and real space refinement was carried out with Phenix⁹², while manual model building was done with COOT. After several cycles of refinement and model building, the inhibitor was placed into the cryo-EM map.

Reporting summary

Further information on research design is available in the Nature Portfolio Reporting Summary linked to this article.

Data availability

The cryo-EM data generated in this study have been deposited in the PDB and in the EM data bank under accession codes 8A1R and EMD-15084, respectively. The X-ray-derived data of small molecular fragments in complex with TGR used in this study to design the compounds here described are available in the PDB under accession codes 6FTC, 6FMU, 6FMZ, 6FP4, 2X99, 2X8G, 2X8H, 6ZST, 6ZP3, 6ZLP, 6ZLB, 7B02, 7NPX, 2V6O, 6RTJ, 6RTO, 6RTM, and 3H4K. The X-ray-derived data of human GR in complex with NAPD⁺ used in this study to formulate the inhibition mechanism of the compounds depicted in Fig. 5 is available in the PDB under accession codes 3D4K. The ChEMBL25 data used in this study are available in the ChEMBL25 database here [https://doi.org/10.6019/CHEMBL.database.25]. Source data are provided with this paper.

References

King, C. H. Parasites and poverty: the case of schistosomiasis. Acta Trop. 113, 95–104 (2010).
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Steinmann, P., Keiser, J., Bos, R., Tanner, M. & Utzinger, J. Schistosomiasis and water resources development: systematic review, meta-analysis, and estimates of people at risk. Lancet Infect. Dis. 6, 411–425 (2006).
Article PubMed Google Scholar
King, C. H. It’s time to dispel the myth of “asymptomatic” schistosomiasis. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 9, e0003504 (2015).
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Yegorov, S. et al. Impact of Endemic Infections on HIV Susceptibility in Sub-Saharan Africa. Trop. Dis. Travel Med. Vaccines 5, 22 (2019).
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Yegorov, S. et al. Schistosoma mansoni treatment reduces HIV entry into cervical CD4+ T cells and induces IFN-I pathways. Nat. Commun. 10, 2296 (2019).
Article ADS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Cioli, D., Pica-Mattoccia, L., Basso, A. & Guidi, A. Schistosomiasis control: praziquantel forever? Mol. Biochem. Parasitol. 195, 23–29 (2014).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Eyayu, T., Zeleke, A. J. & Worku, L. Current status and future prospects of protein vaccine candidates against Schistosoma mansoni infection. Parasite Epidemiol. Control 11, e00176 (2020).
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Gardner, J. M. F., Mansour, N. R., Bell, A. S., Helmby, H. & Bickle, Q. The discovery of a novel series of compounds with single-dose efficacy against juvenile and adult Schistosoma species. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 15, e0009490 (2021).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Lelo, A. E. et al. No apparent reduction in schistosome burden or genetic diversity following four years of school-based mass drug administration in mwea, central kenya, a heavy transmission area. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 8, e3221 (2014).
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Mwinzi, P. N. et al. Additional Evaluation of the Point-of-Contact Circulating Cathodic Antigen Assay for Schistosoma mansoni Infection. Front. Public Health 3, 48 (2015).
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Gurarie, D. et al. Modelling control of Schistosoma haematobium infection: predictions of the long-term impact of mass drug administration in Africa. Parasit. Vectors 8, 529 (2015).
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Fallon, P. G. & Doenhoff, M. J. Drug-resistant schistosomiasis: resistance to praziquantel and oxamniquine induced in Schistosoma mansoni in mice is drug specific. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 51, 83–88 (1994).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Gonnert, R. & Andrews, P. Praziquantel a new board-spectrum antischistosomal agent. Z. Parasitenkd. 52, 129–150 (1977).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Mahende, M. K. et al. Comparative palatability of orally disintegrating tablets (ODTs) of Praziquantel (L-PZQ and Rac-PZQ) versus current PZQ tablet in African children: A randomized, single-blind, crossover study. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 15, e0007370 (2021).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Huang, H. H., Rigouin, C. & Williams, D. L. The redox biology of schistosome parasites and applications for drug development. Curr. Pharm. Des. 18, 3595–3611 (2012).
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Alger, H. M. & Williams, D. L. The disulfide redox system of Schistosomamansoni and the importance of a multifunctional enzyme, thioredoxin glutathione reductase. Mol. Biochem. Parasitol. 121, 129–139 (2002).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Angelucci, F. et al. Mapping the catalytic cycle of Schistosoma mansoni thioredoxin glutathione reductase by X-ray crystallography. J. Biol. Chem. 285, 32557–32567 (2010).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Kuntz, A. N. et al. Thioredoxin glutathione reductase from Schistosoma mansoni: an essential parasite enzyme and a key drug target. PLoS Med. 4, e206 (2007).
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Sayed, A. A. et al. Identification of oxadiazoles as new drug leads for the control of schistosomiasis. Nat. Med. 14, 407–412 (2008).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Lyu, H. et al. Characterization of Lead Compounds Targeting the Selenoprotein Thioredoxin Glutathione Reductase for Treatment of Schistosomiasis. ACS Infect. Dis. 6, 393–405 (2020).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Gencheva, R. & Arner, E. S. J. Thioredoxin Reductase Inhibition for Cancer Therapy. Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 62, 177–196 (2022).
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Joardar, N., Guevara-Flores, A., Martinez-Gonzalez, J. J. & Sinha Babu, S. P. Thiol antioxidant thioredoxin reductase: A prospective biochemical crossroads between anticancer and antiparasitic treatments of the modern era. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 165, 249–267 (2020).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Rai, G. et al. Structure mechanism insights and the role of nitric oxide donation guide the development of oxadiazole-2-oxides as therapeutic agents against schistosomiasis. J. Med. Chem. 52, 6474–6483 (2009).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Zhang, J. et al. Small molecule inhibitors of mammalian thioredoxin reductase as potential anticancer agents: An update. Med. Res. Rev. 39, 5–39 (2019).
Article ADS CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Zhang, J., Li, X., Han, X., Liu, R. & Fang, J. Targeting the Thioredoxin System for Cancer Therapy. Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 38, 794–808 (2017).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Strelow, J. M. A Perspective on the Kinetics of Covalent and Irreversible Inhibition. SLAS Discov. 22, 3–20 (2017).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Caffrey, C. R. et al. Drug Discovery and Development for Schistosomiasis. In Neglected Tropical Diseases (eds Swinney, D., Pollastri, M., Mannhold, R., Buschmann, H. & Holenz, J.) (Wiley, 2019).
Trainor-Moss, S. & Mutapi, F. Schistosomiasis therapeutics: whats in the pipeline? Expert Rev. Clin. Pharmacol. 9, 157–160 (2016).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Benson, A. B. 3rd Oltipraz: a laboratory and clinical review. J. Cell. Biochem. Suppl. 17F, 278–291 (1993).
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Huang, H. H. et al. Investigations of the catalytic mechanism of thioredoxin glutathione reductase from Schistosoma mansoni. Biochemistry 50, 5870–5882 (2011).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Angelucci, F. et al. Inhibition of Schistosoma mansoni thioredoxin glutathione reductase by auranofin: Structural and kinetic aspects. J. Biol. Chem. 284, 28977–28985 (2009).
Angelucci, F. et al. Glutathione reductase and thioredoxin reductase at the crossroad: The structure of Schistosoma mansoni thioredoxin glutathione reductase. Proteins: Struct. Funct. Bioinform. 72, 936–945 (2008).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Silvestri, I. et al. Fragment-Based Discovery of a Regulatory Site in Thioredoxin Glutathione Reductase Acting as “Doorstop” for NADPH Entry. ACS Chem. Biol. 13, 2190–2202 (2018).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Fata, F. et al. Probing the Surface of a Parasite Drug Target Thioredoxin Glutathione Reductase Using Small Molecule Fragments. ACS Infect. Dis. 7, 1932–1944 (2021).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
National Center for Biotechnology Information. PubChem Bioassay Record for AID 485364, qHTS Assay for the Inhibitors of Schistosoma Mansoni Peroxiredoxins, Source: National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS). Retrieved from https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/bioassay/485364 (2023).
Silvestri, I. et al. Ectopic suicide inhibition of thioredoxin glutathione reductase. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 147, 200–211 (2020).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
SZMAP 1.6.1.0: OpenEye Scientific Software SF, NM. SZMAP 1.6.1.0: OpenEye Scientific Software, Santa Fe, NM.).
BROOD 3.1.4.0: OpenEye Scientific Software SF, NM. BROOD 3.1.4.0: OpenEye Scientific Software, Santa Fe, NM.).
Molecular Operating Environment (MOE), 2019.01; Chemical Computing Group LLC, 1010 Sherbooke St. West, Suite #910, Montreal, QC, Canada, H3A 2R7, 2019) (2019).
VIDA 5.0.3: OpenEye Scientific Software SF, NM. VIDA 5.0.3: OpenEye Scientific Software, Santa Fe, NM.).
Lipinski, C. A., Lombardo, F., Dominy, B. W. & Feeney, P. J. Experimental and computational approaches to estimate solubility and permeability in drug discovery and development settings. Adv. Drug Del. Rev. 23, 3–25 (1997).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Stohler, H. R. & Montavon, M. 9-Acridanone-hydrazones, a novel class of broad spectrum schistosomicidal agents. In Proceedings of XI International Congress for Tropical Medicine and Malaria (1984).
Zhang, L. et al. Highly selective off-on fluorescent probe for imaging thioredoxin reductase in living cells. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 136, 226–233 (2014).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Zeisel, L. et al. Selective cellular probes for mammalian thioredoxin reductase TrxR1: rational design of RX1, a modular 1,2-thiaselenane redox probe. Chem 8, 1493–1517 (2022).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Stafford, W. C. et al. Irreversible inhibition of cytosolic thioredoxin reductase 1 as a mechanistic basis for anticancer therapy. Sci. Transl. Med. 10, eaaf7444 (2018).
Zhang, R. et al. Moderate to high throughput in vitro binding kinetics for drug discovery. Front. Biosci. 8, 278–297 (2016).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Copeland, R. A. Evaluation of enzyme inhibitors in drug discovery. A guide for medicinal chemists and pharmacologists. Methods Biochem. Anal. 46, 1–265 (2005).
PubMed Google Scholar
Bartee, D., Morris, F., Al-Khouja, A. & Freel Meyers, C. L. Hydroxybenzaldoximes Are D-GAP-Competitive Inhibitors of E. coli 1-Deoxy-D-Xylulose-5-Phosphate Synthase. ChemBioChem 16, 1771–1781 (2015).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Kumar, S. et al. Structure based development of phenylimidazole-derived inhibitors of indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase. J. Med. Chem. 51, 4968–4977 (2008).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Kashtoh, H. et al. Dihydropyrano [2,3-c] pyrazole: Novel in vitro inhibitors of yeast alpha-glucosidase. Bioorg. Chem. 65, 61–72 (2016).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Forneris, F., Orru, R., Bonivento, D., Chiarelli, L. R. & Mattevi, A. ThermoFAD, a Thermofluor-adapted flavin ad hoc detection system for protein folding and ligand binding. FEBS J. 276, 2833–2840 (2009).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Hanigan, T. W., Aboukhatwa, S. M., Taha, T. Y., Frasor, J. & Petukhov, P. A. Divergent JNK Phosphorylation of HDAC3 in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Cells Determines HDAC Inhibitor Binding and Selectivity. Cell Chem. Biol. 24, 1356–1367.e1358 (2017).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Berkholz, D. S., Faber, H. R., Savvides, S. N. & Karplus, P. A. Catalytic cycle of human glutathione reductase near 1 A resolution. J. Mol. Biol. 382, 371–384 (2008).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Lombardo, F. C., Pasche, V., Panic, G., Endriss, Y. & Keiser, J. Life cycle maintenance and drug-sensitivity assays for early drug discovery in Schistosoma mansoni. Nat. Protoc. 14, 461–481 (2019).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Kasinathan, R. S., Sharma, L. K., Cunningham, C., Webb, T. R. & Greenberg, R. M. Inhibition or knockdown of ABC transporters enhances susceptibility of adult and juvenile schistosomes to Praziquantel. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 8, e3265 (2014).
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Bulman, C. A. et al. Repurposing auranofin as a lead candidate for treatment of lymphatic filariasis and onchocerciasis. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 9, e0003534 (2015).
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Krnajski, Z., Gilberger, T. W., Walter, R. D., Cowman, A. F. & Muller, S. Thioredoxin reductase is essential for the survival of Plasmodium falciparum erythrocytic stages. J. Biol. Chem. 277, 25970–25975 (2002).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Holdgate, G. A., Meek, T. D. & Grimley, R. L. Mechanistic enzymology in drug discovery: a fresh perspective. Nat. Rev. Drug. Discov. 17, 115–132 (2018).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Saccoccia, F. et al. Thioredoxin reductase and its inhibitors. Curr. Protein Pept. Sci. 15, 621–646 (2014).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Benhar, M., Shytaj, I. L., Stamler, J. S. & Savarino, A. Dual targeting of the thioredoxin and glutathione systems in cancer and HIV. J. Clin. Investig. 126, 1630–1639 (2016).
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Pica-Mattoccia, L. & Cioli, D. Sex- and stage-related sensitivity of Schistosoma mansoni to in vivo and in vitro praziquantel treatment. Int. J. Parasitol. 34, 527–533 (2004).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Panic, G., Flores, D., Ingram-Sieber, K. & Keiser, J. Fluorescence/luminescence-based markers for the assessment of Schistosoma mansoni schistosomula drug assays. Parasit. Vectors 8, 624 (2015).
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Nwaka, S. & Hudson, A. Innovative lead discovery strategies for tropical diseases. Nat. Rev. Drug. Discov. 5, 941–955 (2006).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Lima, R. M. et al. Albendazole-praziquantel interaction in healthy volunteers: kinetic disposition, metabolism and enantioselectivity. Br. J. Clin. Pharm. 71, 528–535 (2011).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Doenhoff, M. J. The immune-dependence of chemotherapy in experimental schistosomiasis. Mem. Inst. Oswaldo Cruz 84(Suppl 1), 31–37 (1989).
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Williams, D. L., Bonilla, M., Gladyshev, V. N. & Salinas, G. Thioredoxin glutathione reductase-dependent redox networks in platyhelminth parasites. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 19, 735–745 (2013).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
May, H. C. et al. Repurposing Auranofin, Ebselen, and PX-12 as Antimicrobial Agents Targeting the Thioredoxin System. Front. Microbiol. 9, 336 (2018).
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Ethaselen for the Treatment of Thioredoxin Reductase High Expression Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancers. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02166242. Updated March 16, 2022. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02166242. Phase I and II Study of Auranofin in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL). ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01419691. Updated January 18, 2016. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01419691. Auranofin and Sirolimus in Treating Participants With Ovarian Cancer. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03456700. Updated April 26, 2023. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03456700.
Fata, F. et al. Biochemical and structural characterizations of thioredoxin reductase selenoproteins of the parasitic filarial nematodes Brugia malayi and Onchocerca volvulus. Redox Biol. 51, 102278–102278 (2022).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Boumis, G. et al. Crystal structure of Plasmodium falciparum thioredoxin reductase, a validated drug target. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 425, 806–811 (2012).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Labute, P. Protonate3D: assignment of ionization states and hydrogen coordinates to macromolecular structures. Proteins 75, 187–205 (2009).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Maier, J. A. et al. ff14SB: Improving the Accuracy of Protein Side Chain and Backbone Parameters from ff99SB. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 11, 3696–3713 (2015).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Gerber, P. R. & Muller, K. MAB, a generally applicable molecular force field for structure modelling in medicinal chemistry. J. Comput. -Aided Mol. Des. 9, 251–268 (1995).
Article ADS CAS PubMed Google Scholar
The PyMOL Molecular Graphics System, Version 2.5.4, Schrödinger, LLC.
Angelucci, F. et al. Glutathione reductase and thioredoxin reductase at the crossroad: the structure of Schistosoma mansoni thioredoxin glutathione reductase. Proteins 72, 936–945 (2008).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Angelucci, F. et al. Inhibition of Schistosoma mansoni thioredoxin-glutathione reductase by auranofin: structural and kinetic aspects. J. Biol. Chem. 284, 28977–28985 (2009).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Mendez, D. et al. ChEMBL: towards direct deposition of bioassay data. Nucleic Acids Res. 47, D930–D940 (2019).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Dataset CHEMBL25, https://doi.org/10.6019/CHEMBL.database.25 (2018).
Cheng, Q. & Arner, E. S. J. Selenocysteine Insertion at a Predefined UAG Codon in a Release Factor 1 (RF1)-depleted Escherichia coli Host Strain Bypasses Species Barriers in Recombinant Selenoprotein Translation. J. Biol. Chem. 292, 5476–5487 (2017).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Cortés-Ríos, J. et al. NADPH oxidase activity: Spectrophotometric determination of superoxide using pyrogallol red. Anal. Biochem. 536, 96–100 (2017).
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Tucker, M. S., Karunaratne, L. B., Lewis, F. A., Freitas, T. C. & Liang, Y.-S. Schistosomiasis. Curr. Protoc. Immunol. 103, 19.11.11–19.11.58 (2013).
Article Google Scholar
Lalli, C. et al. Development and validation of a luminescence-based, medium-throughput assay for drug screening in Schistosoma mansoni. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 9, e0003484 (2015).
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Riss, T., Niles, A., Moravec, R., Karassina, N. & Vidugiriene, J. Cytotoxicity Assays: In Vitro Methods to Measure Dead Cells. In Assay Guidance Manual (eds Markossian, S. et al.) (Eli Lilly & Company and the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, 2004).
Wells, K. E. & Cordingley, J. S. Schistosoma mansoni: eggshell formation is regulated by pH and calcium. Exp. Parasitol. 73, 295–310 (1991).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Stocking, E. M., Schwarz, J. N., Senn, H., Salzmann, M. & Silks, L. A. Synthesis of L-selenocystine, L-[77Se]selenocystine and L-tellurocystine. J. Chem. Soc. Perkin 1, 2443–2448 (1997).
Article Google Scholar
Reddy, K. M. & Mugesh, G. Modelling the Inhibition of Selenoproteins by Small Molecules Using Cysteine and Selenocysteine Derivatives. Chem. Eur. J. 25, 8875–8883 (2019).
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Mastronarde, D. N. Automated electron microscope tomography using robust prediction of specimen movements. J. Struct. Biol. 152, 36–51 (2005).
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Zivanov, J. et al. New tools for automated high-resolution cryo-EM structure determination in RELION-3. Elife 7, e42166 (2018).
Zheng, S. Q. et al. MotionCor2: anisotropic correction of beam-induced motion for improved cryo-electron microscopy. Nat. Methods 14, 331–332 (2017).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Zhang, K. Gctf: Real-time CTF determination and correction. J. Struct. Biol. 193, 1–12 (2016).
Article ADS CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Emsley, P., Lohkamp, B., Scott, W. G. & Cowtan, K. Features and development of Coot. Acta Crystallogr. D. Biol. Crystallogr. 66, 486–501 (2010).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Afonine, P. V. et al. Real-space refinement in PHENIX for cryo-EM and crystallography. Acta Crystallogr. D. Struct. Biol. 74, 531–544 (2018).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Download references

Acknowledgements

Oncomelania hupensis subsp. hupensis, Chinese strain, infected with S. japonicum, Chinese strain, and Biomphalaria glabrata, strain NMRI, infected with S. mansoni, strain NMRI, were provided by the NIAID Schistosomiasis Resource Center for distribution through BEI Resources, NIAID, NIH. We are grateful to Dr. Guy Schoehn (Univ. Grenoble Alpes, CEA, CNRS, Institut de Biologie Structurale, Grenoble, France), Prof. Beatrice Vallone (Sapienza University of Rome, Italy) and Dr. Linda C. Montemiglio (IBPM, National Research Council, Italy) for helpful discussions of the cryo-EM studies. We acknowledge the Elettra-Sincrotrone Trieste (Italy) for support in X-ray data collections and the European Synchrotron Radiation Facility for provision of microscope time on CM01. The study was funded in part by US NIH/NIAID R33AI127635 to F.A., P.A.P., G.R.T. and D.L.W. This work benefited from access to Research Resources Centre and UICentre at University of Illinois at Chicago and used the platforms of the Grenoble Instruct-ERIC center (ISBG; UAR 3518 CNRS-CEA-UGA-EMBL) within the Grenoble Partnership for Structural Biology (PSB), supported by FRISBI (ANR-10-INBS-0005-02) and GRAL, financed within the University Grenoble Alpes graduate school (Ecoles Universitaires de Recherche) CBH-EUR-GS (ANR-17-EURE-0003). The IBS Electron Microscope facility is supported by the Auvergne Rhône-Alpes Region, the Fonds Feder, the Fondation pour la Recherche Médicale and GIS-IBiSA. The IBS acknowledges integration into the Interdisciplinary Research Institute of Grenoble (IRIG, CEA). M.A. has been supported by MIUR - Ministero dell’Istruzione Ministero dell’Università e della Ricerca (Ministry of Education, University and Research) under the national project FSE/FESR - PON Ricerca e Innovazione 2014-2020 (N° AIM1887574, CUP: E18H19000350007). M.A. stay in IBS (Grenoble, France) was funded by Instruct-ERIC (proposal number: 16046), part of the European Strategy Forum on Research Infrastructures (ESFRI) and supported by national member subscriptions by the proposal APPID1673. We acknowledge OpenEye/Cadence for providing us with an academic license for the software used in these studies.

Author information

These authors contributed equally: Valentina Z. Petukhova, Sammy Y. Aboagye, Matteo Ardini.

Authors and Affiliations

Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, College of Pharmacy, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
Valentina Z. Petukhova, Luke N. M. Harding, Dejan Nikolic & Pavel A. Petukhov
Department of Microbial Pathogens and Immunity, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
Sammy Y. Aboagye, Rachel P. Lullo, Margaret E. Byrne, Lucy M. Martin & David L. Williams
Department of Life, Health and Environmental Sciences, University of L’Aquila, L’Aquila, Italy
Matteo Ardini, Francesca Fata, Federica Gabriele, Rodolfo Ippoliti & Francesco Angelucci
UICentre, Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, College of Pharmacy, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
Vamshikrishna Gone & Daniel D. Lantvit
Department of Pharmacy Practice, College of Pharmacy, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
Bikash Dangi & Jeremy J. Johnson
University of Grenoble Alpes, CEA, CNRS, IBS, F-38000, Grenoble, France
Grégory Effantin & Wai Li Ling
Department of Pharmacology & Toxicology, R. Ken Coit College of Pharmacy, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA
Gregory R. J. Thatcher

Authors

Valentina Z. Petukhova
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Sammy Y. Aboagye
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Matteo Ardini
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Rachel P. Lullo
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Francesca Fata
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Margaret E. Byrne
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Federica Gabriele
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Lucy M. Martin
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Luke N. M. Harding
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Vamshikrishna Gone
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Bikash Dangi
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Daniel D. Lantvit
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Dejan Nikolic
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Rodolfo Ippoliti
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Grégory Effantin
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Wai Li Ling
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Jeremy J. Johnson
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Gregory R. J. Thatcher
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Francesco Angelucci
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
David L. Williams
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Pavel A. Petukhov
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

V.Z.P. performed inhibitor design, synthesis, characterization, and wrote the manuscript; P.A.P. performed computer-aided inhibitor design studies; W.L.L, M.A. carried out negative staining TEM, G.E., M.A. performed cryo-EM data collections; M.A. carried out sample preparation for cryo-EM, data processing and wrote the manuscript; M.A., F.F., F.G., R.I., F.A. carried out X-ray crystallographic studies, refined and analyzed both X-ray- and cryo-EM-derived structural data; D.N. performed characterization of inhibitor reactivity with TGR; D.D.L., V.G., B.D. performed PK studies; J.J.J. supervised PK studies; L.N.M.H. performed photolabeling experiments; S.Y.A. performed ex vivo and in vivo studies, biochemical studies, and wrote the manuscript; R.P.L. preformed biochemical studies and wrote the manuscript; M.E.B., L.M.M. preformed biochemical studies; G.R.J.T. wrote the manuscript; F.A., D.L.W., P.A.P. wrote the manuscript and supervised all the research.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Francesco Angelucci, David L. Williams or Pavel A. Petukhov.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

Compounds in this manuscript are a part of US Provisional Application No. 63/392,214. Applicants: University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, U.S.A.; Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, U.S.A.; University of L’Aquila, L’Aquila, Italy. Inventors: P.A.P., D.L.W., F.A., V.Z.P., S.Y.A., M.A. COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS FOR TREATING SCHISTOSOMIASIS, 2022. There are no other competing interests to declare.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Communications thanks Karl Hoffmann, and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. A peer review file is available.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Peer Review File

Description of Additional Supplementary Files

Supplementary Movie 1

Supplementary Movie 2

Reporting Summary

Source data

Source Data

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Petukhova, V.Z., Aboagye, S.Y., Ardini, M. et al. Non-covalent inhibitors of thioredoxin glutathione reductase with schistosomicidal activity in vivo. Nat Commun 14, 3737 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-39444-y

Download citation

Received: 28 October 2022
Accepted: 12 June 2023
Published: 22 June 2023
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-39444-y

This article is cited by

Fragment library screening by X-ray crystallography and binding site analysis on thioredoxin glutathione reductase of Schistosoma mansoni
- Lauro Ribeiro de Souza Neto
- Bogar Omar Montoya
- Floriano Paes Silva-Jr
Scientific Reports (2024)

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Subjects

Abstract

Similar content being viewed by others

Introduction

Results

Fragment-based drug design and chemistry

TGR is inhibited in S. mansoni worms

TGR inhibitors do not react covalently with GSH, selenocysteine, or TGR, and inhibition of TGR is reversible

TGR inhibitors target a reduced form of TGR

Inhibitors do not convert TGR into an NADPH oxidase

TGR inhibitors bind to the doorstop pocket

TGR inhibitors can achieve selectivity over mammalian enzymes

TGR inhibitors are potent schistosomicidal agents ex vivo

Efflux may affect efficacy of TGR inhibitors ex vivo

TGR inhibitors have efficacy as schistosomicidal agents in vivo

Pharmacokinetic (PK) studies

Non-covalent inhibitors of TrxR class of redox proteins may have broad application

Discussion

Methods

Computer-aided molecular design, synthesis, and characterization

Photolabeling of TGR with PRP

Enzyme inhibition, kinetics, ex vivo and in vivo activity

Enzyme preparation and activity determination

Thermal shift assay (TSA)

NADPH dependence of inhibition

Time dependence of inhibition

Reversibility by jump dilution

NADPH competition

Superoxide production

NADPH consumption

Evaluation of schistosomicidal activity

Preparation of NTS

Preparation of juvenile and adult worms

Schistosomicidal activity of compounds against NTS, juvenile and adult worms

Channel blockers enhanced schistosomicidal activity of compounds

Phenotypic assessment of PZQ activity on NTS

Cytotoxicity in mammalian cells

Assessment of schistosomicidal activity in mice

TGR inhibition in worms: TRFS-Green fluorescence quantification and GSH/GSSG determination

Pharmacokinetics of 1 and 2 in vivo: intraperitoneal administration

Chemicals and reagents

Animals

LC-MS/MS conditions

Pharmacokinetics of 2 in vivo: oral gavage

Chemicals and reagents

Animals

Analytical standard preparation

Sample preparation

LC-MS/MS conditions

Evaluation of compound 2 stability under the biochemical assay conditions with recombinant TGR

Assessment of reactivity of 2 and TRi-1 with N-Boc protected methyl ester of L-selenocysteine

Cryo-EM methods

Negative staining transmission electron microscopy

Cryogenic electron microscopy

Reporting summary

Data availability

References

Acknowledgements

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Contributions

Corresponding authors

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

Peer review

Peer review information

Additional information

Supplementary information

Source data

Rights and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Share this article

This article is cited by

Comments

Search

Quick links