Intercellular exchange of Wnt ligands reduces cell population heterogeneity during embryogenesis

Hatakeyama, Yudai; Saito, Nen; Mii, Yusuke; Takada, Ritsuko; Shinozuka, Takuma; Takemoto, Tatsuya; Naoki, Honda; Takada, Shinji

doi:10.1038/s41467-023-37350-x

Download PDF

Article
Open access
Published: 06 April 2023

Intercellular exchange of Wnt ligands reduces cell population heterogeneity during embryogenesis

Nature Communications volume 14, Article number: 1924 (2023) Cite this article

2605 Accesses
3 Citations
3 Altmetric
Metrics details

Subjects

Abstract

Wnt signaling is required to maintain bipotent progenitors for neural and paraxial mesoderm cells, the neuromesodermal progenitor (NMP) cells that reside in the epiblast and tailbud. Since epiblast/tailbud cells receive Wnt ligands produced by one another, this exchange may average out the heterogeneity of Wnt signaling levels among these cells. Here, we examined this possibility by replacing endogenous Wnt3a with a receptor-fused form that activates signaling in producing cells, but not in neighboring cells. Mutant mouse embryos show a unique phenotype in which maintenance of many NMP cells is impaired, although some cells persist for long periods. The epiblast cell population of these embryos increases heterogeneity in Wnt signaling levels as embryogenesis progresses and are sensitive to retinoic acid, an endogenous antagonist of NMP maintenance. Thus, mutual intercellular exchange of Wnt ligands in the epiblast cell population reduces heterogeneity and achieves robustness to environmental stress.

Transient loss of Polycomb components induces an epigenetic cancer fate

Article Open access 24 April 2024

Emx2 underlies the development and evolution of marsupial gliding membranes

Article Open access 24 April 2024

Simultaneous single-cell three-dimensional genome and gene expression profiling uncovers dynamic enhancer connectivity underlying olfactory receptor choice

Article Open access 15 April 2024

Introduction

The number of stem and progenitor cells is tightly controlled during embryogenesis and homeostasis. As the developmental context or external environment surrounding these cells changes, stem and progenitor cell populations respond to these changes, thereby keeping these cells under control. In many cases, secreted signal proteins control the maintenance and differentiation of stem/progenitor cells^1,2,3. However, mechanisms by which these proteins contribute to the robustness of these cell populations remain to be determined.

The body axis of vertebrate embryos elongates in an anterior-to-posterior fashion. During this elongation process, cells that constitute tissues in the trunk and tail are continuously generated from progenitor cells⁴. These progenitor cells are found in an area at the posterior end of embryos, termed the epiblast in early embryonic stages and called the tailbud in later stages. Clonal lineage analysis revealed that both neural and paraxial-mesodermal cell types are commonly generated from the same progenitor cells throughout the period of axis elongation⁵. These bipotent progenitor cells are called “neuromesodermal progenitor” (NMP) cells^6,7,8,9. NMP cells appear just before the onset of somitogenesis and are maintained until the conclusion of axis elongation. In mouse embryos, NMPs are located in the caudal lateral epiblast (CLE) posterior to the node-streak border of the primitive streak region and the chordoneural hinge (CNH) of the tailbud^{5,10,11,12,13,14}. Population and clonal analyses indicate that these cells behave like stem cells^10,11,15.

Cell signaling molecules and transcription factors are implicated in the regulation of axis elongation, probably by maintaining NMPs^{15,16,17,18,19}. For instance, in the mouse, at least three Wnt ligands are sequentially expressed in the epiblast and tailbud. Wnt3 expression is first activated in the posterior epiblast at E5.5, followed by Wnt8a and Wnt3a expression^16,17,18,19. While Wnt3 and Wnt8a expression cease by early somite stage, Wnt3a expression continues until E12.5, when tail elongation is almost completed²⁰. Along with the expression of these Wnt ligands, a T-box transcription factor, T/Brachyury (Bra), is continuously expressed in the same region from the onset to the end of Wnt3 expression²¹. Evidence suggests that Wnt signaling and Bra are important for the maintenance of NMPs. Genetic studies of null mutant embryos of Wnt3a and Bra, showed their importance for axis elongation^16,22, and lineage tracing of cells that express Bra revealed that both neural and paraxial mesoderm cells are derived from Bra-expressing cells^23,24,25. In addition to NMP maintenance, Wnt signaling and Bra are involved in fate determination between the neural and paraxial-mesodermal lineages^22,26. Of note, Wnt signaling directly activates Bra expression through Tcf transcription factor, while Bra is required for Wnt3a expression^22,27,28,29. Thus, Wnt and Bra form a positive feedback loop in which each actively regulates the expression of the other in NMP maintenance. Similarly, positive feedback between wnt8 and tbxta (ntl), a zebrafish ortholog of Bra, has been reported in zebrafish^30,31,32. During maintenance of NMPs, activation of Wnt signaling and Bra expression overlap widely in the epiblast and tailbud, including the area where NMPs exists²². Thus, some Wnt ligands may act in an autocrine manner in the epiblast and the tailbud, resulting in self-activation of a Wnt/Bra regulatory loop in each cell. On the other hand, given that cells adjoining NMP cells also express Wnt ligands and Bra, paracrine Wnt ligands supplied by neighboring cells may also be involved in NMP maintenance^33,34.

In this study, to examine the importance of Wnt paracrine function in the maintenance of NMPs, we generated knock-in mouse embryos in which endogenous Wnt3a is replaced with a receptor-fused form that lacks paracrine activity, but maintains autocrine activity. Exacting analysis of Wnt paracrine-deficient embryos revealed the significance of the paracrine signal for the maintenance of the NMP cell population and resilience to stress from surrounding tissue.

Results

Lack of paracrine activity in Wnt3a fused with Frizzled

To eliminate the paracrine activity of WNT3A, we fused mouse WNT3A to the N-terminus of human FRIZZLED5 via 2 MYC tags (WNT3A-FZD5; Fig. 1a). Activity of WNT3A-FZD5 was examined in cells stably expressing TOPFlash reporter (STF293 cells)^35,36 in comparison with authentic WNT3A, as well as GFP-fused WNT3A (GFP-WNT3A; Fig. 1a). Activity of GFP-WNT3A was lower than that of authentic WNT3A (Fig. 1b), but sufficient to replace endogenous Wnt3a in vivo³⁷. WNT3A-FZD5 activated canonical Wnt signaling to almost the same extent as authentic WNT3A and more strongly than GFP-WNT3A, 48 h after transfection. This activity was nearly saturated after even longer incubation (Fig. 1b). In contrast, whereas Wnt activity was activated in STF293 cells co-cultured with cells expressing intact WNT3A or GFP-WNT3A, almost no activation was detected in co-culture with WNT3A-FZD5-expressing cells (Fig. 1c). Consistent with this result, WNT3A-FZD5 was not detected in the culture supernatant (Supplementary Fig. 1). These results show that as expected, WNT3A-FZD5 possesses sufficient signaling activity, but almost no paracrine activity.

**Fig. 1: In vitro activity of WNT3A-FZD5 and generation of Wnt3a-Fzd5 knock-in mice.**

Impaired axis elongation in Wnt3a-Fzd5 homozygous embryos

We next generated mouse embryos in which endogenous Wnt3a is substituted for Wnt3a-Fzd5, using a CRISPR/Cas9-mediated knock-in approach (Supplementary Fig. 2a–f). Mice heterozygous for Wnt3a-Fzd5 were morphologically normal and fertile (Fig. 1d–g, Supplementary Fig. 2g–k). As expected, Wnt3a-Fzd5 exhibited an expression pattern identical to that of endogenous Wnt3a in these embryos (Fig. 1d–g, Supplementary Fig. 2g–j). In addition, Western blotting analysis revealed that Wnt3a-Fzd5 heterozygous and homozygous embryos expressed WNT3A-FZD5 proteins at the expense of authentic Wnt3a in the posterior region (Fig. 1h). Thus, Wnt3a-Fzd5 properly replaced endogenous Wnt3a, being expressed in the same spatial pattern as endogenous Wnt3a.

While Wnt3a-Fzd5 heterozygous mice (+/W3aF5) showed no obvious abnormality (Fig. 1i, j), Wnt3a-Fzd5 homozygotes (W3aF5/W3aF5), were embryonically lethal and died after E12.5 (Supplementary Fig. 2k). To better understand this puzzling phenotype of Wnt3a-Fzd5 homozygous embryos, we examined their morphology. While the gross morphology of Wnt3a-Fzd5 homozygous embryos appeared normal in the anterior trunk, it was highly disorganized posterior to the hindlimbs (Fig. 1i–k). Transverse images of E11.5 embryos stained with DAPI showed that neural tube morphology was gradually disturbed along the anterior-posterior axis in these embryos (Fig. 1l–n). This disruption was evident in the intermediate region between fore- and hindlimbs (Fig. 1n’) and pronounced in the more posterior region, resulting in an open neural tube at the hindlimb level (Fig. 1n”). Interestingly, a thin, kinked tail-like structure was found at the posterior end of these embryos (Fig. 1k: red arrowhead).

Whole-mount in situ hybridization analyses also revealed that the neural tube, marked by Sox2 expression, was morphologically abnormal posterior to the hindlimb at E10.5 in Wnt3a-Fzd5 homozygous embryos (Fig. 2i, j). Somites, stained with the Uncx 4.1 probe³⁸, were normally formed in the anterior trunk, but their size was reduced posterior to the hindlimb (Fig. 2l, m). Of note, Brachyury (Bra), which is expressed in the tailbud and notochord of normal embryos³⁹, was expressed at the tip of the thin and kinked tail, although the number of Bra-positive cells was decreased (Fig. 2a, b). In addition, Tbx6 expression, which is turned on immediately after specification of the paraxial mesoderm lineage⁴⁰, was also detected at this posterior end (Fig. 2e, f). Furthermore, expression of Bra and Tbx6 at the posterior tip was maintained even at E12.5, when tail elongation is nearly arrested in normal embryos (Fig. 2n–q) Thus, in Wnt3a-Fzd5 homozygous embryos, trunk morphogenesis was disrupted at the hindlimb level, accompanied by a reduction of tailbud size, but differentiation from the remaining progenitor cells in the reduced tailbud appears to be maintained throughout the period of axis elongation.

**Fig. 2: Expression of mesoderm and neural marker genes in *Wnt3a-Fzd5* homozygous embryos.**

The phenotype of Wnt3a-Fzd5 homozygotes was milder than that of Wnt3a null mutant embryos, which die around E9.5 with posterior truncation (Fig. 2d, h)¹⁶. On the other hand, GFP-Wnt3a homozygotes, in which the endogenous Wnt3a is replaced with a fusion gene encoding GFP-WNT3A shown in Fig. 1, exhibited almost normal elongation of the trunk and tail, except for a slight twist at the tip of the tail (Fig. 2c, g, k; Supplementary Fig. 3)³⁷, although the activity of GFP-Wnt3a was lower than the native Wnt3a in the epiblast as in in vitro experiments (Fig. 1b, c; Supplementary Fig. 4). Thus, even though WNT3A-FZD5 has a higher level of signaling activity than GFP-WNT3A, whose activity level is almost sufficient for axis elongation (Fig. 1b, c), Wnt3a-Fzd5 only partially substitutes for endogenous Wnt3a in embryos.

Development of Wnt(+) progenitors in Wnt3a-Fzd5 homozygotes

To examine the impact of tailbud reduction on posterior morphogenesis of Wnt3a-Fzd5 homozygous embryos, we followed cells that showed activated Wnt signaling, because Wnt signaling is activated in progenitor cells in the epiblast and tailbud region. To this end, Axin2-creERT2 and floxed tdTomato⁴¹ alleles were introduced into Wnt3a-Fzd5 homozygous embryos. Tamoxifen was injected into pregnant female mice at 7.5 or 8.5 days post-coitus (dpc) and embryos were fixed at E10.5 (Fig. 3a and Supplementary Fig. 5a). In wild-type, and Wnt3a-Fzd5 heterozygous embryos, labeled cells were detected in most tissues at the hindlimb level, when tamoxifen was injected at 7.5 dpc (Supplementary Fig. 5b–e). In contrast, when tamoxifen was injected at 8.5 dpc, labeled cells were rarely detected in the ventral neural tube at the hindlimb level (Fig. 3b, d; Supplementary Fig. 5d, e), showing that the origin of ventral neural cells loses Wnt signaling after E7.5. Because the proportion of labeled cells was not significantly changed between littermates in tissues except neural tube (Fig. 3e), i.e., somites (Fig. 3h) and the nephric duct (Fig. 3i), we confirmed that cells had once activated Wnt signaling in the epiblast/tailbud at E8.5 were labeled with a similar efficiency in control and Wnt3a-Fzd5 homozygous embryos. However, comparing with control littermates, the number of labeled cells was specifically reduced in neural tube (Fig. 3f) and somites (Fig. 3g) in Wnt3a-Fzd5 homozygous embryos. Thus, the number of cells derived from Wnt-positive progenitors at E8.5 was decreased in dorsal neural tube and somites of Wnt3a-Fzd5 homozygous embryos.

**Fig. 3: Differentiation of Wnt-positive progenitor cells in the neural tube and somites in *Wnt3a-Fzd5* homozygous embryos.**

As described above, Wnt3a is expressed in the roof plate of the neural tube, in addition to the epiblast and tailbud (Fig. 1d–g). Thus, it also seems probable that Wnt3a-Fzd5 expression in the roof plate region causes the morphological abnormality in Wnt3a-Fzd5 homozygous embryos. To test this possibility, we examined the contribution of Bra to this phenotype, because Bra interacts specifically with Wnt3a in development of the epiblast/tailbud, but not the roof plate. While Wnt3a-Fzd5 heterozygotes (Supplementary Fig. 6a, d) and Bra single heterozygotes (Supplementary Fig. 6b, e) appeared normal, Wnt3a-Fzd5 and Bra compound heterozygous embryos (Wnt3a^+/Fzd5;Bra^+/-) had open neural tubes and bent tails.(Supplementary Fig. 6c, f). Thus, Wnt3a-Fzd5 function in the epiblast and tailbud region appears to be involved in the phenotype of Wnt3a-Fzd5 homozygous embryos.

Wnt3a-Fzd5 phenotype due to lack of paracrine activity

Reduction of the Wnt3a signal impairs maintenance of the tailbud, including NMP cells^16,24. This defect results in truncation of A-P elongation in a manner dependent on Wnt3a activity⁴². To further investigate whether the characteristic phenotype of Wnt3a-Fzd5 homozygous embryos, including the persistence of small number of tail bud cells, was caused solely by decreased Wnt3a activity, we compared these embryos with Wnt3a hypomorphic mutant embryos that exhibit truncation of axial elongation to the same degree as in Wnt3a-Fzd5 homozygous embryos. To this end, we focused on Wnt3a^vt/- (vt/-) embryos, which possess one copy of a hypomorphic (vt) allele of Wnt3a with reduced Wnt3a expression after E8.0 in the tailbud (Supplementary Fig. 4, 7)⁴² and impair trunk development at the hindlimb level (Supplementary Fig.8). In contrast to Wnt3a-Fzd5 homozygotes, vt/- embryos failed to maintain the tailbud, marked by Bra and Tbx6 expression, at E10.5 (Supplementary Fig. 8d–k) and E12.5 (Supplementary Fig. 8i, m). Therefore, the phenotype of Wnt3a-Fzd5 homozygotes is unique, compared with other Wnt3a hypomorphic mutants, and is not simply due to decreased Wnt3a activity.

This characteristic phenotype of Wnt3a-Fzd5 homozygous embryos was also observed in Wnt3a^Fzd5/- embryos (Supplementary Fig. 9a–c, e–g), whereas Wnt3a-Fzd5 heterozygous embryos (Wnt3a^+/Fzd5) appeared normal, as previously described (Fig. 1j, Supplementary Fig. 9a, e). Thus, Wnt3a-Fzd5 seems to cause this phenotype in the absence of wild-type Wnt3a. Consistently, this phenotype can be rescued depending on the expression level of normal Wnt3a, because the phenotype of Wnt3a^Fzd5/- embryos was partially rescued by replacing the null allele to vt (Wnt3a^Fzd5/vt; Supplementary Fig. 9d, h). Based on the results of these analyses using various Wnt3a mutants, the characteristic phenotype of Wnt3a-Fzd5 homozygotes is due to some property lost in Wnt3a-Fzd5, most likely paracrine activity.

NMP cells in Wnt3a-Fzd5 homozygous embryos

In spite of improper development in the posterior neural tube and somites, our analyses with molecular markers revealed that differentiation of paraxial mesoderm and neural cells was partially maintained in Wnt3a-Fzd5 homozygous embryos (Fig. 2i–m). Furthermore, the tailbud, marked by expression of Bra, was maintained at the posterior tip of the tail of these embryos (Fig. 2a, b, e, f, n–q). These data suggest that a small number of NMP cells persist in Wnt3a-Fzd5 homozygous embryos.

Since one of the characteristics of NMP cells is the expression of Bra and Sox2⁴³, we compared the number of Bra and Sox2 double-positive cells using immunohistochemistry in Wnt3a-Fzd5 homozygous embryos and control littermates (Fig. 4a–r, u, v and Supplementary Fig. 10). The number of Bra and Sox2 double-positive cells was reduced at E8.75 in Wnt3a-Fzd5 homozygous embryos (Fig. 4a–p), but a small number of double-positive cells were still maintained even at E11.5 (Fig. 4q, r, u, v). In contrast, double-positive cells disappeared in vt/- embryos at E11.5 (Fig. 4s, w, t, x). These results support the idea that a small number of NMP cells are specifically maintained in Wnt3a-Fzd5 homozygous embryos, even after trunk development is impaired.

**Fig. 4: NMP cells in *Wnt3a-Fzd5* homozygous embryos.**

Wnt signaling activity in Wnt3a-Fzd5 homozygous embryos

To further investigate the defect of Wnt3a-Fzd5 homozygous embryos, we directly examined Wnt signaling activity in individual cells in the epiblast. To this end, we utilized the R26 WntVis reporter, the expression of which is driven by heptameric TCF/LEF1 binding sequences combined with a viral minimal promoter in the Rosa26 locus⁴⁴. This reporter responds in a graded fashion to a wide range of Wnt signal strengths. In addition, histone H2B-GFP protein, used as a fluorescent reporter, facilitates single-cell resolution analysis under confocal microscopy. In this study, the fluorescence of this reporter was measured in individual cells in a photon-counting mode. Epiblast cells in the areas surrounding the node (region 1) and/or those lateral to the node (region 2) were individually analyzed in a single confocal plane.

During the development of mouse epiblast, three Wnt ligands, Wnt3, Wnt8, and Wnt3a, sequentially activate Wnt signaling^16,18,21,45. Because Wnt3 and Wnt8 are expressed prior to Wnt3a, Wnt activity was detected even in Wnt3a null mutant embryos at the early headfold stage (E7.0)⁴⁴. At this stage, no obvious change in Wnt activity was detected in Wnt3a-Fzd5 homozygous embryos, as predicted (Supplementary Fig. 11a–e). Then, Wnt3a expression was activated, and the Wnt signaling level subsequently increased in both control and Wnt3a-Fzd5 homozygous embryos (Supplementary Fig. 11f–i), but not in Wnt3a null embryos (Supplementary Fig. 11j, u, v), at the late headfold stage (E7.5). Thus, Wnt signaling was properly activated in the initial phase of Wnt3a-dependent activation, even in Wnt3a-Fzd5 homozygous embryos. Of note, in these stages, the level of the fluorescent reporter differed among epiblast cells in both control and Wnt3a-Fzd5 homozygous embryos.

From the early somite stage (E8.0), Wnt signaling began to be perturbed in Wnt3a-Fzd5 homozygous embryos. At E8.0, around the 2-3-somite stage, the number of Wnt signaling-positive cells was reduced in the anterior and lateral epiblast regions of Wnt3a-Fzd5 homozygous embryos (Supplementary Fig. 11l–p). The reduction in Wnt signaling-positive cells was pronounced in both medial (region 1) and lateral (region 2) epiblast regions of Wnt3a-Fzd5 homozygous embryos at E8.75 (Fig. 5a–f). Considering that lack of paracrine activity can lead to heterogeneity in Wnt signaling between adjacent cells, we focused on the top 10% of cells with strong Wnt signaling to examine the extent to which cells with strong Wnt signaling affect Wnt signaling in surrounding cells. Actually, the heterogeneity of Wnt signaling between neighboring cells, defined as variation index, was significantly increased in Wnt3a-Fzd5 homozygous embryos at E8.75 (Fig. 5o–q, Supplementary Fig. 11k). The reduction in Wnt signaling-positive cells was enhanced by E9.5, but some Wnt-positive cells remained at the posterior end of Wnt3a-Fzd5 homozygous embryos (Supplementary Fig. 11w, x). On the other hand, in vt/- embryos, the decrease of Wnt signaling started at E8.75 (Fig. 5g–l, Supplementary Fig. 11q–t, y, z). In contrast to Wnt3a-Fzd5 homozygous embryos, Wnt signaling was almost abolished around E9.5 in epiblast (Supplementary Fig. 11w–z), and the deviation of Wnt-activity in epiblast population was not significantly changed in vt/- embryos (Fig. 5o–q).

**Fig. 5: Wnt signaling in the epiblast cell population of *Wnt3a-Fzd5* homozygous embryos.**

Taken together, in Wnt3a-Fzd5 homozygous embryos, reduction of Wnt activity occurred from early somite stage, but a small number of Wnt-positive cells remain longer. Notably, Wnt activity appeared to vary between adjacent cells, even in control embryos, but in Wnt3a-Fzd5 homozygous embryos this heterogeneity was significantly enhanced (Fig. 5o–q). Probably, the accelerated reduction of Wnt activity in many epiblast cells reduces the number of NMP cells, as well as of neural and somite cells produced by NMP cells in Wnt3a-Fzd5 homozygous embryos. In contrast, persistent activation of Wnt signaling in the other epiblast cells probably contributes to the maintenance of a small number of NMP cells, resulting in the formation of thin, kinked tails.

Effect of retinoic acid on Wnt3a-Fzd5 homozygous embryos

Retinoic acid (RA) antagonizes Bra and Wnt signaling at the caudal end of vertebrate embryos during body axis elongation³¹. In mouse embryos, RA signaling is activated in the epiblast, posterior mesoderm, and the node at E7.5, and then gradually disappears from these tissues, with strong activation eventually being limited to somites, anterior PSM and neural tube^{13,46,47,48,49}. The mutually exclusive spatial pattern of RA signaling and Wnt signaling suggests that progenitor cells in the epiblast/tailbud region, including NMP, are regulated by their antagonism. Thus, we examined whether the resistance of progenitor cells to RA is changed in Wnt3a-Fzd5 homozygous embryos. Female Wnt3a-Fzd5 heterozygous mice crossed with Wnt3a-Fzd5 heterozygous males were treated with RA 7.5 days post-coitus and the effects of RA on the phonotype of mutant embryos were examined. RA treatment specifically enhanced the abnormality in the gross morphology of Wnt3a-Fzd5 homozygous embryos (Fig. 6a–h). Furthermore, Wnt reporter analysis revealed that RA treatment reduced the average level of Wnt activity, but caused no significant change in heterogeneity, in Wnt3a-Fzd5 homozygous embryos (Fig. 6i–n). This result suggests that the entire epiblast cell population of Wnt3a-Fzd5 homozygous embryos is specifically susceptible to RA.

**Fig. 6: Effect of retinoic acid on the epiblast cell population of *Wnt3a-Fzd5* homozygous embryos.**

Study of Wnt paracrine function by mathematical modeling

The results described above strongly suggest that lack of paracrine signaling enhances heterogeneity of Wnt activity in the epiblast cell population and that a cell population with such enhanced heterogeneity is more sensitive to antagonists, like RA. Thus, we also tested the validity of these ideas by creating a mathematical model (Fig. 7a–g, Supplementary Fig. 12 and Movie1–5). In this model, spatiotemporal changes in Wnt activity were compared in a hypothetical epiblast plane with and without intercellular exchange of Wnt ligands. The temporal increase or decrease of Wnt activity in each cell is defined by the production rate regulated by autocatalysis, which represents a positive feedback loop of Wnt3a/Bra, in addition to the basic rate of production and degradation of Wnt ligands. The stochastic increase/decrease in Wnt activity is also incorporated as a noise term. In this virtual plane, we assume that each cell divides stochastically and that a newly produced daughter cell locates laterally or anteriorly to the original cell. It is also assumed that an RA gradient from anterior to posterior is imposed at a specific time, which represents anteroposterior diffusion of RA. However, in this virtual space, cells that are aligned along the left-right axis were treated as if there is no difference in their distance from the RA source (Fig. 7a).

**Fig. 7: Mathematical model to examine the effect of intercellular communication in cell populations.**

By using adjusted parameters, we first simulated spatiotemporal patterns of Wnt activity in the hypothetical epiblast plane under conditions in which intercellular exchange of Wnt ligands is present (Fig. 7b, d, e) and absent (Figs. 7c, f). Wnt activity levels decreased after the addition of RA (t > 0 shown in Supplementary Fig. 12 and Movie1, 2) and the number of Wnt-low cells (Fig. 7b, c) and heterogeneity between adjacent cells (variation index; Fig. 7g) increased in the absence of intercellular Wnt exchange. However, a relatively small number of Wnt-high cells remained for a while (until t = 4 shown in Fig. 7c Supplementary Fig. 12b and Movie 2). On the other hand, if there was no production except autocatalysis, mimicking the situation of vt/- embryos, Wnt-low cells gradually increased and few Wnt-high cell remained (Fig.7d and Supplementary Fig. 12b and Movie 3). These simulations showed that a lack of intercellular Wnt exchange reproduced the spatiotemporal pattern of Wnt activity observed in Wnt3a-Fzd5 homozygous embryos. Furthermore, we reproduced the increased sensitivity of Wnt3a-Fzd5 homozygote cells and no significant increase in heterogeneity between adjacent cells, when the RA concentration was uniformly increased in the hypothetical epiblast plane (Fig. 7e–g, and Supplementary Movies 4, 5). Taken together, these simulations based on our mathematical model support the idea that the Wnt paracrine signal reduces heterogeneity in Wnt activity in the epiblast cell population and increases robustness to RA. Finally, we note that the content of Wnt-negative cells was lower in the model than in the experiment, suggesting that some unrevealed mechanism involved in suppression of Wnt signaling in the NMP population may exist.

Discussion

It is widely believed that secreted signal proteins act on cells surrounding the source cells^50,51. In contrast, in the epiblast and tailbud, most cells both produce and receive Wnt ligands^24,52,53,54. As a result, in this cell population, each cell is activated by Wnt ligands secreted by each other. Thus, in contrast to unidirectional transfer from Wnt-producing cells to receiving cells, Wnt ligands seem to be reciprocally exchanged between cells in the epiblast and tailbud. To understand the biological significance of reciprocal ligand exchange within a cell population, we generated Wnt3a-Fzd5 homozygous embryos, in which Wnt3a-mediated intercellular communication, or paracrine function, is specifically impaired. In these embryos, the number of cells in which Wnt signaling is strongly activated (Wnt-strong cells) decreases rapidly from the anterior and lateral sides of the epiblast after E8.0, while a small number of Wnt-strong cells, including NMP cells, remain at the posterior end for a long time. Precise examination of Wnt3a-Fzd5 homozygous embryos and mathematical simulation support a model in which Wnt3a-mediated intercellular communication is crucial for the maintenance of the epiblast cell population, including NMP cells (Fig. 7h).

In epiblast and tailbud regions, including NMPs, Wnt3a-expressing cells also express the transcriptional regulator, Bra²². Bra is a direct transcriptional target of the Wnt signaling pathway, whereas Wnt3a expression is also dependent on Bra^22,55. Thus, Wnt3a and Bra are likely to mutually activate one another, forming a positive feedback regulatory loop. Therefore, once expression levels of Wnt3a and Bra in the cell begin to increase or decrease, this positive feedback can further amplify the change. On the other hand, it seems plausible that not all epiblast/tailbud cells are identical with respect to Wnt production and degradation rates, the efficiency of feedback amplification, and/or resistance to environmental factors that reduce Wnt activity. Actually, our analysis with EGFP-H2B Wnt reporter shows heterogeneity of epiblast/tailbud cells. Thus, when differences occur between cells in the direction of changes (increase or decrease) in Wnt signaling activity under certain conditions, such differences are amplified by positive feedback, resulting in increased disparity.

In the epiblast of Wnt3a-Fzd5 homozygotes, the number of cells with little or no Wnt activity rapidly increases from E8.0 in Wnt3a-Fzd5 homozygous embryos. Probably, this rapid decrease can be explained by Wnt3a/Bra-positive feedback, if we assume that the direction of amplification changes from increase to decrease in these cells after E8.0. One of the candidates to trigger this decrease is an antagonist to the Wnt/Bra positive feedback loop, like RA, as shown below. However, at present, it is uncertain whether RA or some other factor triggers this change in vivo. In contrast, a small, but significant number of cells maintain high Wnt activity for a long time in these embryos. A probable reason for the persistence of Wnt-high cells is that the change of Wnt activity in these cells is below the threshold to trigger a rapid decrease by positive feedback. Actually, our mathematical model, which assumes variation in Wnt activity and positive feedback regulation, produces similar spatial patterns of Wnt activity in Wnt3a-Fzd5 homozygous cell populations under conditions without Wnt-mediated intercellular communication.

In contrast, in control embryos, including Wnt3a-Fzd5 heterozygotes, the number of Wnt3a-positive cells slowly decreased and disappeared around E13.5, when axis elongation was terminated. Probably, in these embryos, Wnt ligands supplied by neighboring Wnt-high cells compensate to some extent for the decrease of Wnt activity in Wnt-low cells. Thus, the exchange of Wnt3a ligands appears to compensate for the rapid decrease in Wnt activity in individual cells. Taken together, positive feedback regulation can amplify heterogeneity among members of the cell population, but our results suggest that sharing of intercellular components of the feedback loop, such as Wnt ligands, counteracts the amplification of this heterogeneity.

In the epiblast of Wnt3a-Fzd5 homozygotes, Wnt activity rapidly decreases in many cells at E8.0, when several anterior somites are generated. In these embryos, the decrease in Wnt activity was more pronounced anteriorly and laterally in the epiblast (Fig. 5d–f). Of note, while somite and neural cells are generated from NMP cells, the RA-synthesizing enzyme, retinaldehyde dehydrogenase 2 (RALDH2/ALDH1a2), is mainly expressed in somites and lateral plate mesoderm in mouse embryos^56,57. In addition, a line of evidence has shown that RA signaling antagonizes Wnt/Bra activity gradually from the anterior side of the epiblast and tailbud region in the mouse embryo^{31,56,58,59,60}. Thus, we speculated that the epiblast cell population in Wnt3a-Fzd5 homozygotes is sensitive to RA stress originating from tissues developed anteriorly and laterally to the epiblast.

Actually, RA treatment reduces Wnt signaling in epiblast cells specifically in Wnt3a-Fzd5 homozygous embryos, indicating that the epiblast cell population in these embryos is more susceptible to RA. Probably due to a failure to reduce heterogeneity in these embryos, an RA-triggered decrease in Wnt activity may be amplified rapidly via a positive feedback loop in individual cells. Thus, maintaining cooperativity among members of the epiblast/tailbud cell population and reducing the disparity in Wnt signaling among members may render the cell population more resilient to external stress.

It has been shown that intercellular communication within a cell population is critical to regulate cell differentiation. In Xenopus gastrulas, muscle progenitor cells communicate with each other as they differentiate. In such a case, more than one hundred Xenopus muscle precursor cells transplanted into ectoderm sandwiches can differentiate, while smaller groups and single cells cannot^61,62,63. This cell number-dependent differentiation was described as a “community effect.” In this case, an intercellular interaction among precursor cells seems to be necessary for these cells to differentiate. Theoretical studies have suggested that the positive feedback mediated by intercellular communication is the mechanism underlying this cell number-dependent differentiation⁶⁴.

In this study, we showed that Wnt-mediated intercellular communication is actually involved in maintenance of the cell population in the epiblast/tailbud region. In this case, intercellular exchange of Wnt ligands is important to compensate for the disparity amplified via positive feedback from Wnt3a and Bra. An interesting question is whether a similar molecular network is involved in other events in which a community effect is exerted. Differences in the efficiency of cell signaling or the amplification efficiency of positive feedback loops probably generate differences in the features of cell populations. If this is the case, it will be important in future studies to identify key parameters in the molecular network to produce each of these events.

Methods

Mice

Animal care and experiments were performed in accordance with guidelines for animal experimentation of the National Institutes for Natural Sciences. All animal experiments were approved by the Animal Research Committee of National Institutes for Natural Sciences. Mice were maintained in a light- and temperature-controlled room using a 12 h:12 h light:dark cycle at 21 ± 2 °C. Wnt3a null and vt mice were gifted by Dr. Andrew McMahon. GFP-Wnt3a knock-in mice were previously generated by ST³⁷. Brachyury null mutant mice were distributed by RIKEN BRC (RBRC00113: C3H/HeSn-Ttf/+tf). Wnt vis reporter mice were previously generated by TT⁴⁴. C57BL/6 N mice, purchased from Japan SLC and CLEA-Japan, were used to mate with these mutant mice. Mice younger than 60 weeks were mated for collecting embryos. Embryos derived from timed matings were genotyped by PCR with DNA from yolk sacs or embryos. PCR conditions and primer sequences for Wnt3a null¹⁶ and Wnt vis reporter⁴⁴ mice have been previously described.

Cell culture and transfection

HEK293T and STF293 cells were provided by Dr. Takeichi (RIKEN) and Dr. Tsukiyama (Hokkaido University), respectively. All cells were routinely tested for the absence of mycoplasma. HEK293T cells and STF293 cells, which are HEK293 cells stably expressing Super 7x TOPFlash³⁵, were cultured at 37 °C in a 1:1 mixture of DMEM and Ham’s F12 medium supplemented with 8.3% fetal bovine serum. Cells were inoculated in 24-well plates at a concentration of 1 ×10⁵ cells/well. Plasmids were transfected into HEK 293T cells or STF293 cells using FuGENE6 transfection reagent (Roche). The culture medium was changed 6 h after transfection. At 24, 48, and 72 h after transfection, cells and culture medium were harvested for Western blotting and luciferase reporter assay. In co-culture experiments, HEK 293T cells transfected with each plasmid were collected 24 h after transfection and mixed 1:1 with STF293 cells. These cells were inoculated at a concentration of 1 ×10⁵ cells/well using 24-well plates. The luciferase reporter assay was performed 24 or 48 h after co-culture. Details of Western blotting and the luciferase reporter assay are described below.

Plasmid construction

To generate plasmid constructs from which Wnt3a fused with human Frizzled 5 (hFzd5) is expressed, a DNA fragment encoding the full length of mouse Wnt3a protein fused to the N-terminus of hFzd5 mediated with 2xMyc tag (TSEQKLISEEDLNEMEQKLISEEDLRS) (Supplementary Fig.1a), was integrated between the ClaI and XbaI sites of pCSf107 plasmid vector, which carries the CMV IE94 promoter. This fusion protein was designed to remove the signal peptide of hFzd5, resulting in direct fusion of the N-terminus of hFzd5 to the 2xMyc tag. DNA encoding the full length of mouse Wnt3a and EGFP fused Wnt3a(GFP-Wnt3a) was integrated into pCS2 plasmid vector.

Western blotting and luciferase reporter assay

For detection of proteins in cultured cells and culture supernatant, samples were collected at the time points described in “Cell Culture and Transfection.” To detect Wnt3a-Fzd5 proteins in embryos, the area posterior to the newly formed somite of E8.5 embryos was cut and collected. Samples prepared from two embryos were applied to each lane. SDS-PAGE was carried out according to a standard protocol⁶⁵. Briefly, each sample was mixed with 2x sample buffer [4% SDS, 20% glycerol, 0.001% bromophenol blue and 0.125 M Tris-HCl (pH 6.8)] and heated at 37 °C for 1 h. Samples were electrophoresed using 10% polyacrylamide gels. After electroporation, proteins on the gel were transferred to a polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF) membrane (Millipore). These membranes were treated overnight at 4 °C with primary antibody (rabbit anti-mouse Wnt3a antibody (polyclonal) prepared by us⁶⁶, 1:500, for Fig. 1h, and mouse anti-mouse Wnt3a antibody (monoclonal) prepared also by us⁶⁶, 1:2 dilution of hybridoma supernatant, for Supplementary Fig. 1a), followed by treatment with secondary antibodies (anti-rabbit-IgG HRP conjugated, Jackson Immuno Research 111-035-144, 1:8000, for Fig. 1h, and goat anti-mouse IgG: HRP conjugated, Promega W402B, 1:3000, for Supplementary for Fig. 1a, b) for 1 h at room temperature. Finally, these proteins were visualized using an Enhanced Chemiluminescent Detection System (Amersham).

Luciferase reporter assay was performed according to the manufacturer’s protocol (Dual-Glo Luciferase Assay System: Promega). Since STF293 cells contain a firefly Luciferase cDNA driven by eight tandem repeats of the TCF binding site, Wnt activity was quantified by monitoring the activity of firefly Luciferase. Renilla luciferase was used as an internal control to compensate for the mosaic nature of gene transfection. The activity of Luciferase was detected using a Luminometer (Turner Designs).

Generation of Wnt3a-Fzd5 knock-in mice

In Wnt3a-Fzd5 knock-in mice, a DNA fragment encoding the MYC-hFZD5 fragment was integrated just before the stop codon in exon4 of the mouse Wnt3a gene (Supplementary Fig. 1). The resulting protein expressed from this recombined locus is the same as that expressed in the cell culture experiment described above. To generate this knock-in allele, a pLSODN-3-based plasmid containing a DNA fragment of myc-Fzd5 was co-injected with plasmids to express gRNA and Cas9 in fertilized eggs. The sequence of the gRNA is as follows: 5′-TTAGGAGCTCTCCTACTTGC-3′. This gRNA was inserted into pX330. Genotyping was carried out by PCR using the following primers:

Wnt3a-Fzd5 5F, 5′-TGGTGCTTATCTGCCATTCC-3′;

Wnt3a-Fzd5 WTF2, 5′-GTCACATGCACCTCAAGTGC-3′;

Wnt3a-Fzd5 7F, 5′-GGTGTGCCAGGAAATCACGG-3′;

Wnt3a-Fzd5 7R, 5′-GGACACCTGCTTGTGGTAGG-3′;

Wnt3a-Fzd5 WTR2, 5′-AGGATCCTTCCTAGCAGTCC-3′;

Wnt3a-Fzd5 4R, 5′-TTTCTACAGTTGACCGGCTC-3′.

The combination of primers used for PCR is shown in Supplementary Fig. 1. Fragments of 2564-bp and 3,338-bp were expected from the 5′-region of wild-type Wnt3a and Wnt3a-Fzd5 alleles, respectively. On the other hand, a 2368-bp fragment and a 3564-bp fragment were expected in the 3′-region of wild-type Wnt3a and Wnt3a-Fzd5 alleles, respectively.

In situ hybridization

Whole-mount in situ hybridization was performed using digoxigenin-labeled, antisense RNA probes. Briefly, embryos collected at the indicated stages were fixed with 4% paraformadyhyde (PFA) overnight at 4 °C, washed with PBS, and treated with 20 µg/mL of proteinase K for 5 min. These embryos were incubated in hybridization buffer (50% formamide, 5× SSC, 1% SDS, 50 µg/mL tRNA) overnight at 55 °C. The next day, embryos were washed consecutively with 5× SSC, 2× SSC, and Tris-buffered saline with Tween 20 (TBST). Next, embryos were incubated with 1% sheep serum (Sigma) in TBST for 1 h and then treated with a 1:500 dilution of anti-digoxigenin-AP Fab fragments (Roche) overnight at 4 °C. The following day, embryos were washed with TBST and alkaline phosphatase buffer [100 mM NaCl, 100 mM Tris-HCl (pH 9.5), 50 mM MgCl₂, 0.5% Tween 20], and signals were developed using BM Purple (Roche). Wild-type and mutant embryos were stained for the same period in individual experiments. The following probes, which have been reported previously, were used: mouse Wnt3a⁶⁷, mouse Brachyury³⁹ and mouse Tbx6^22,40, mouse Uncx4.1³⁸, and human Fzd5⁶⁸. To generate a Sox2 probe, the first exon of mouse Sox2 was amplified from mouse genomic DNA and cloned to generate an antisense probe.

Immunofluorescence

Whole-mount immunofluorescence was performed on embryos collected at the indicated stages. These embryos were fixed with 4% PFA overnight at 4 °C, and washed with PBS. Embryos were incubated overnight at 4 °C with the following primary antibodies: rabbit anti-Sox2 (polyclonal, Millipore, AB5603, 1:200) and goat anti-Brachyury (polyclonal, Santacruz, 17745, 1:1000). After washing with PBS, embryos were incubated overnight at 4 °C with DAPI (Dojindo) and following secondary antibodies: donkey anti-rabbit IgG (Alexa fluor 647 conjugated, Invitrogen A31573, 1:500) and donkey anti-goat IgG (Alexa fluor 647 conjugated, Invitrogen A21432, 1:500). Then, embryos were rinsed with PBS again and mounted on 0.8% LMP agarose for observation. Fluorescent images were acquired using an inverted confocal microscope (Leica SP8).

Retinoic acid treatment

To detect sensitivity to RA signaling in Wnt3a-Fzd5 homozygotes, we crossed Wnt3a-Fzd5 heterozygotes. RA dissolved in DMSO was injected into the abdominal cavities of pregnant female mice at 7.5 dpc at a dose equivalent to 6 mg per whole body weight, and embryos were harvested at 8.5 dpc.

Wnt vis reporter detection

Embryos were harvested at each stage and fixed overnight in 4% PFA. Then, they were stained with DAPI in 1% Triton X-100 solution (1:2000) for several hours or overnight and mounted in 0.8% LMP agarose. Fluorescent images were acquired using an inverted confocal microscope (Leica SP8). The fluorescence of this reporter in the nucleus was measured in individual cells in a photon-counting mode. Epiblast cells in the region lateral to the node were individually analyzed in a single confocal plane. The area of the nuclei in each cell was identified by DAPI staining. GFP intensity in the identified area was determined. For cells with the top 10% GFP intensity in region 2, the relative GFP intensities of cells in contact with those high-GFP cells were summarized.

Quantification and statistical analysis

Information about statistical details and methods is indicated in the figure legend. Statistical analyses were performed using R for Mac (ver. 4.1.1) and Excel (ver.16.66.1) softwares. Data are expressed as mean ± SD (standard deviation). Differences were assessed for statistical significance as indicated in the figure legends. P values <0.05 were considered statistically significant.

Mathematical model

We considered an ideal situation in which ${L}_{x}\times {L}_{y}$ epiblast cells align on a regular square lattice such that the x and y axes coincide with the left-right and the anterior-posterior axes (Fig. 7a). Each cell has its Wnt signaling activity as a variable ${W}_{{ij}}$, where i and j are the indexes of the cell on the x–y coordinate. The activity ${W}_{{ij}}$ changes in time through the production, autocatalytic reaction, degradation, and intercellular diffusion of Wnt molecules (Fig. 7a), and its time evolution is given by Langevin equation:

$${\tau \frac{{{{{{\rm{d}}}}}}}{{{{{{{\rm{d}}}}}}t}}W}_{\!\!ij}=a+\frac{\alpha }{1+{{C}_{{RA}}(\,\,j,t)}^{2}}\frac{{{W}_{{ij}}}^{2}}{{K}^{2}+{{W}_{{ij}}}^{2}}-{W}_{{ij}}+D\mathop{\sum}\limits_{k,k{\prime} \in n.n.}\left({W}_{k,k{\prime} }-{W}_{{ij}}\right)+{\gamma \xi }_{{ij}}(t)$$

(1)

where $\tau$ is a constant parameter for determining timescale. The first and second terms on the right side represent the production of Wnt molecules; A constant production (1st term) is described by the parameter $a$, and the autocatalytic reaction (2nd term) is represented by the Hill equation with half saturation concentration K. RA-dependent repression of the autocatalytic reaction is described by the pre-factor of the Hill equation with the autocatalysis strength $\alpha$ and RA concentration ${C}_{{RA}}(j,t)$. When RA diffusion does not reach the region of epiblast cells (t < t_RA, e.g., before E.8.0), the value of ${C}_{{RA}}(j,t)$. is set to 0$.\,$After RA diffusion reaches this region $(t \ge {t}_{{RA}}\,{{{{{\rm{e}}}}}}.{{{{{\rm{g}}}}}}.,\,{{{{{\rm{after}}}}}} \; {{{{{\rm{E}}}}}}.8.0),$ ${C}_{{RA}}(j,t)$ creates the following time-independent spatial gradient that increases linearly along y-axis (the anterior-posterior axis) with a slope $\bigtriangleup$:

$${C}_{{RA}}(j,t)={c}_{0}+j\bigtriangleup .$$

The third term in Eq. (1) represents the degradation of Wnt molecules, while the fourth term denotes intercellular diffusion of Wnt molecules with diffusion constant D. The summation $\mathop{\sum}\nolimits_{k,{k}^{{\prime} }\in n.n.}(\,)\,$indicates the summation with respect to the nearest-neighbor cells around ${W}_{{ij}}$ (i.e., ${W}_{i\pm 1,j}$ and ${W}_{i,j\pm 1}$). The last term in Eq.(1) denotes the noise term: $\gamma$ and ${\xi }_{{ij}}(t)$ indicate the noise strength and independent Gaussian white noise with zero mean and variance $\langle {{\xi }_{ij}}(t){{\xi}_{i ^\prime j ^\prime}} (t ^{\prime} )\rangle=\delta \left(t-{t}{{^\prime}}\right){{\delta }_{i,i ^\prime}}{{\delta }_{j,\, j ^\prime}},$ respectively. Cell division events are also considered a stochastic Poisson process in the model. Each cell divides randomly at a constant rate $\lambda$. By cell division, surrounding cells are pushed stochastically toward either the left (in the negative direction of the x-axis with probability 1/4), right (along the positive direction of x-axis with probability 1/4) or upward (along the positive direction of y-axis with probability 1/2). For instance, when the left is chosen in the division of cell with $x=i$ and $y=j$, all cells with $x < i$ and $y=j$ move toward the left. The extruded cell outside the ${L}_{x}\times {L}_{y}$ lattice is removed. The ${W}_{{ij}}$ value of the dividing cell is inherited by daughter cells.

Equation (1) is numerically solved by the Euler–Maruyama method with $\triangle t={10}^{-5}$, while the presence or absence of a cell division event is determined at each time step following the probability ${\lambda L}_{x}{L}_{y}\Delta t$. The time unit is normalized so that $\lambda=1$, while the length scale is normalized by cell length (the lattice size). The diffusion constant D is set to D = 0.2 for paracrine (+) cells (Fig. 7b, d and e) and D = 0 for paracrine (-) cells (Fig. 7c and f). The production rate of Wnt molecules was chosen as $a=0.025$ for paracrine ($\pm$) cells (Fig. 7b, c, e and f) and $a=0.0$ for paracrine ($+$)-production ($\downarrow$) cells (Fig.7d). The parameter ${c}_{0}$ that represents basal RA concentration for $t\ge {t}_{{RA}}$ was chosen as$\,{c}_{0}=0.1$ for RA(-) situation (Fig.7b-d) and$\,{c}_{0}=0.15$ for RA(+) situation (Fig.7e and f). For other parameters, the following values were used: ${L}_{x}={L}_{y}=50$,$\,\alpha=0.8,{K}=0.38,\,\tau=0.02,\,\Delta=0.005,\,\gamma=0.01.$

Reporting summary

Further information on research design is available in the Nature Portfolio Reporting Summary linked to this article.

Data availability

All other data that support the findings of this study are provided in the article or Supplementary Information/Source Data file. Source data are provided with this paper.

References

Beumer, J. & Clevers, H. Cell fate specification and differentiation in the adult mammalian intestine. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 22, 39–53 (2021).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Chacón-Martínez, C. A., Koester, J. & Wickström, S. A. Signaling in the stem cell niche: regulating cell fate, function and plasticity. Development 145, dev165399 (2018).
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Clevers, H., Loh, K. M. & Nusse, R. Stem cell signaling. An integral program for tissue renewal and regeneration: Wnt signaling and stem cell control. Science 346, 1248012 (2014).
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Stern, C. D. et al. Head-tail patterning of the vertebrate embryo: one, two or many unresolved problems? Int. J. Dev. Biol. 50, 3–15 (2006).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Tzouanacou, E., Wegener, A., Wymeersch, F. J., Wilson, V. & Nicolas, J. F. Redefining the progression of lineage segregations during mammalian embryogenesis by clonal analysis. Dev. Cell 17, 365–376 (2009).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Brown, J. M. & Storey, K. G. A region of the vertebrate neural plate in which neighbouring cells can adopt neural or epidermal fates. Curr. Biol. 10, 869–872 (2000).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Kondoh, H. & Takemoto, T. Axial stem cells deriving both posterior neural and mesodermal tissues during gastrulation. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 22, 374–380 (2012).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Henrique, D., Abranches, E., Verrier, L. & Storey, K. G. Neuromesodermal progenitors and the making of the spinal cord. Development 142, 2864–2875 (2015).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Steventon, B. & Martinez Arias, A. Evo-engineering and the cellular and molecular origins of the vertebrate spinal cord. Dev. Biol. 432, 3–13 (2017).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Cambray, N. & Wilson, V. Two distinct sources for a population of maturing axial progenitors. Development 134, 2829–2840 (2007).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Cambray, N. & Wilson, V. Axial progenitors with extensive potency are localised to the mouse chordoneural hinge. Development 129, 4855–4866 (2002).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Tam, P. P. & Beddington, R. S. The formation of mesodermal tissues in the mouse embryo during gastrulation and early organogenesis. Development 99, 109–126 (1987).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Wilson, V., Olivera-Martinez, I. & Storey, K. G. Stem cells signals and vertebrate body axis extension. Development 136, 1591–1604 (2009).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Wilson, V. & Beddington, R. S. Cell fate and morphogenetic movement in the late mouse primitive streak. Mech. Dev. 55, 79–89 (1996).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Attardi, A. et al. Neuromesodermal progenitors are a conserved source of spinal cord with divergent growth dynamics. Development 145, dev166728 (2018).
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Takada, S. et al. Wnt-3a regulates somite and tailbud formation in the mouse embryo. Genes Dev. 8, 174–189 (1994).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Cunningham, T. J., Kumar, S., Yamaguchi, T. P. & Duester, G. Wnt8a and Wnt3a cooperate in the axial stem cell niche to promote mammalian body axis extension. Dev. Dyn. 244, 797–807 (2015).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Zhao, X. & Duester, G. Effect of retinoic acid signaling on Wnt/β-catenin and FGF signaling during body axis extension. Gene Expr. Patterns 9, 430–435 (2009).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Liu, P. et al. Requirement for Wnt3 in vertebrate axis formation. Nat. Genet. 22, 361–365 (1999).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Tenin, G. et al. The chick somitogenesis oscillator is arrested before all paraxial mesoderm is segmented into somites. BMC Dev. Biol. 10, 24 (2010).
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Rivera-Pérez, J. A. & Magnuson, T. Primitive streak formation in mice is preceded by localized activation of Brachyury and Wnt3. Dev Biol 288, 363–371 (2005).
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Yamaguchi, T. P., Takada, S., Yoshikawa, Y., Wu, N. & McMahon, A. P. T (Brachyury) is a direct target of Wnt3a during paraxial mesoderm specification. Genes Dev. 13, 3185–3190 (1999).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Anderson, M. J. et al. TCreERT2, a transgenic mouse line for temporal control of cre-mediated recombination in lineages emerging from the primitive streak or tail bud. PLoS ONE 8, e62479 (2013).
Article ADS CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Garriock, R. J. et al. Lineage tracing of neuromesodermal progenitors reveals novel wnt-dependent roles in trunk progenitor cell maintenance and differentiation. Development 142, 1628–1638 (2015).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Imuta, Y., Kiyonari, H., Jang, C. W., Behringer, R. R. & Sasaki, H. Generation of knock-in mice that express nuclear enhanced green fluorescent protein and tamoxifen-inducible Cre recombinase in the notochord from Foxa2 and T loci. Genesis 51, 210–218 (2013).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Yoshikawa, Y., Fujimori, T., McMahon, A. P. & Takada, S. Evidence that absence of Wnt-3a signaling promotes neuralization instead of paraxial mesoderm development in the mouse. Dev. Biol. 183, 234–242 (1997).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Dunty, W. C. et al. Wnt3a/β-catenin signaling controls posterior body development by coordinating mesoderm formation and segmentation. Development 135, 85–94 (2008).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Dunty, W. C., Kennedy, M. W. L., Chalamalasetty, R. B., Campbell, K. & Yamaguchi, T. P. Transcriptional profiling of Wnt3a mutants identifies Sp transcription factors as essential effectors of the Wnt/β-catenin pathway in neuromesodermal stem cells. PLoS ONE 9, e87018 (2014).
Article ADS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Galceran, J., Hsu, S. C. & Grosschedl, R. Rescue of a Wnt mutation by an activated form of LEF-1: regulation of maintenance but not initiation of Brachyury expression. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 98, 8668–8673 (2001).
Article ADS CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Martin, B. L. & Kimelman, D. Regulation of canonical Wnt signaling by brachyury is essential for posterior mesoderm formation. Dev Cell 15, 121–133 (2008).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Martin, B. L. & Kimelman, D. Brachyury establishes the embryonic mesodermal progenitor niche. Genes Dev. 24, 2778–2783 (2010).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Martin, B. L. & Kimelman, D. Canonical Wnt signaling dynamically controls multiple stem cell fate decisions during vertebrate body formation. Dev. Cell 22, 223–232 (2012).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Wymeersch, F. J. et al. Transcriptionally dynamic progenitor populations organised around a stable niche drive axial patterning. Development 146, dev168161 (2019).
PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Wymeersch, F. J. et al. Position-dependent plasticity of distinct progenitor types in the primitive streak. Elife 5, e10042 (2016).
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Tsukiyama, T. et al. Molecular role of RNF43 in canonical and noncanonical Wnt signaling. Mol. Cell Biol. 35, 2007–2023 (2015).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Xu, Q. et al. Vascular development in the retina and inner ear: control by Norrin and Frizzled-4, a high-affinity ligand-receptor pair. Cell 116, 883–895 (2004).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Shinozuka, T., Takada, R., Yoshida, S., Yonemura, S. & Takada, S. Wnt produced by stretched roof-plate cells is required for the promotion of cell proliferation around the central canal of the spinal cord. Development 146, dev159343 (2019).
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Mansouri, A. et al. Paired-related murine homeobox gene expressed in the developing sclerotome, kidney, and nervous system. Dev. Dyn. 210, 53–65 (1997).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Herrmann, B. G. Expression pattern of the Brachyury gene in whole-mount TWis/TWis mutant embryos. Development 113, 913–917 (1991).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Chapman, D. L., Agulnik, I., Hancock, S., Silver, L. M. & Papaioannou, V. E. Tbx6, a mouse T-Box gene implicated in paraxial mesoderm formation at gastrulation. Dev. Biol. 180, 534–542 (1996).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Shaner, N. C. et al. Improved monomeric red, orange and yellow fluorescent proteins derived from Discosoma sp. red fluorescent protein. Nat. Biotechnol. 22, 1567–1572 (2004).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Greco, T. L. et al. Analysis of the vestigial tail mutation demonstrates that Wnt-3a gene dosage regulates mouse axial development. Genes Dev. 10, 313–324 (1996).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Tsakiridis, A. et al. Distinct Wnt-driven primitive streak-like populations reflect in vivo lineage precursors. Development 141, 1209–1221 (2014).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Takemoto, T. et al. R26-WntVis reporter mice showing graded response to Wnt signal levels. Genes Cells 21, 661–669 (2016).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Yamaguchi, T. P. Genetics of Wnt signaling during early mammalian development. Methods Mol. Biol. 468, 287–305 (2008).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Ribes, V., le Roux, I., Rhinn, M., Schuhbaur, B. & Dollé, P. Early mouse caudal development relies on crosstalk between retinoic acid, Shh and Fgf signalling pathways. Development 136, 665–676 (2009).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Sirbu, I. O. & Duester, G. Retinoic-acid signalling in node ectoderm and posterior neural plate directs left-right patterning of somitic mesoderm. Nat. Cell Biol. 8, 271–277 (2006).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Vermot, J. et al. Retinoic acid controls the bilateral symmetry of somite formation in the mouse embryo. Science 308, 563–566 (2005).
Article ADS CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Ghyselinck, N. B. & Duester, G. Retinoic acid signaling pathways. Development 146, dev167502 (2019).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Briscoe, J. & Small, S. Morphogen rules: design principles of gradient-mediated embryo patterning. Development 142, 3996–4009 (2015).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Gurdon, J. B. & Bourillot, P. Y. Morphogen gradient interpretation. Nature 413, 797–803 (2001).
Article ADS CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Christian, J. L. & Moon, R. T. Interactions between Xwnt-8 and Spemann organizer signaling pathways generate dorsoventral pattern in the embryonic mesoderm of Xenopus. Genes Dev. 7, 13–28 (1993).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Petersen, C. P. & Reddien, P. W. Wnt signaling and the polarity of the primary body axis. Cell 139, 1056–1068 (2009).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Shimizu, T., Bae, Y. K., Muraoka, O. & Hibi, M. Interaction of Wnt and caudal-related genes in zebrafish posterior body formation. Dev. Biol. 279, 125–141 (2005).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Koch, F. et al. Antagonistic activities of Sox2 and brachyury control the fate choice of neuro-mesodermal progenitors. Dev. Cell 42, 514–526 (2017).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Abu-Abed, S. et al. Developing with lethal RA levels: genetic ablation of Rarg can restore the viability of mice lacking Cyp26a1. Development 130, 1449–1459 (2003).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Niederreither, K., McCaffery, P., Dräger, U. C., Chambon, P. & Dollé, P. Restricted expression and retinoic acid-induced downregulation of the retinaldehyde dehydrogenase type 2 (RALDH-2) gene during mouse development. Mech. Dev. 62, 67–78 (1997).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Abu-Abed, S. et al. The retinoic acid-metabolizing enzyme, CYP26A1, is essential for normal hindbrain patterning, vertebral identity, and development of posterior structures. Genes Dev. 15, 226–240 (2001).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
MacLean, G. et al. Cloning of a novel retinoic-acid metabolizing cytochrome P450, Cyp26B1, and comparative expression analysis with Cyp26A1 during early murine development. Mech. Dev. 107, 195–201 (2001).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Sakai, Y. et al. The retinoic acid-inactivating enzyme CYP26 is essential for establishing an uneven distribution of retinoic acid along the anterio-posterior axis within the mouse embryo. Genes Dev. 15, 213–225 (2001).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Gurdon, J. A community effect in animal development. Nature 336, 772–774 (1998).
Article ADS Google Scholar
Gurdon, J. B., Lemaire, P. & Kato, K. Community effects and related phenomena in development. Cell 75, 831–834 (1993).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Standley, H. J., Zorn, A. M. & Gurdon, J. B. eFGF and its mode of action in the community effect during Xenopus myogenesis. Development 128, 1347–1357 (2001).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Saka, Y., Lhoussaine, C., Kuttler, C., Ullner, E. & Thiel, M. Theoretical basis of the community effect in development. BMC Syst. Biol. 5, 54 (2011).
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Laemmli, U. K. Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature 227, 680–685 (1970).
Article ADS CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Takada, R. et al. Monounsaturated fatty acid modification of Wnt protein: its role in Wnt secretion. Dev Cell 11, 791–801 (2006).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Roelink, H. & Nusse, R. Expression of two members of the Wnt family during mouse development–restricted temporal and spatial patterns in the developing neural tube. Genes Dev. 5, 381–388 (1991).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Wang, Y. et al. A large family of putative transmembrane receptors homologous to the product of the Drosophila tissue polarity gene frizzled. J. Biol. Chem. 271, 4468–4476 (1996).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank members of the Spectrography and Bioimaging Facility of the NIBB Core Research Facilities for their technical support. We also thank Drs. Satoshi Takahashi and Seiya Mizuno at the University of Tsukuba for generating Wnt3a-Fzd5 knock-in mice using CRISPR/Cas9-mediated genome editing, Dr. Toshihiko Fujimori at NIBB for providing mice and technical support, and Dr. Andrew McMahon for providing vt mice. Dr. Kazuhiro Aoki at NIBB and ExCELLS and all members of ST’s laboratory are gratefully acknowledged for helpful discussions. This work was supported by the following programs: Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research (B), 18H02454 and 21H02498 to ST, Grants-in-aid for Scientific Research on Innovative Areas, 24111002, 17H05782, 19H04797 to ST, Grants-in-aid for Transformative Research Areas, 22H05642 to ST, and 21H05793 to NS, from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science. Additional support came from grants from the National Institutes of Natural Sciences (NINS Joint Research Program to ST) and the Cooperative Study Program of Exploratory Research Center on Life and Living Systems (ExCELLS; program Nos. 21-102 to HN and NS).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Exploratory Research Center on Life and Living Systems (ExCELLS), National Institutes of Natural Sciences, 5-1 Higashiyama, Myodaiji-cho, Okazaki, Aichi, 444-8787, Japan
Yudai Hatakeyama, Nen Saito, Yusuke Mii, Ritsuko Takada, Takuma Shinozuka, Naoki Honda & Shinji Takada
National Institute for Basic Biology, National Institutes of Natural Sciences, 5-1 Higashiyama, Myodaiji-cho, Okazaki, Aichi, 444-8787, Japan
Yudai Hatakeyama, Nen Saito, Yusuke Mii, Ritsuko Takada, Takuma Shinozuka & Shinji Takada
The Graduate University for Advanced Studies (SOKENDAI), 5-1 Higashiyama, Myodaiji-cho, Okazaki, Aichi, 444-8787, Japan
Yudai Hatakeyama, Nen Saito, Yusuke Mii, Takuma Shinozuka & Shinji Takada
Graduate School of Integrated Sciences for Life, Hiroshima University, 1-3-2 Kagamiyama, Higashi-Hiroshima, Hiroshima, 739-8511, Japan
Nen Saito & Naoki Honda
PREST, Japan Science and Technology Agency (JST), Kawaguchi, Saitama, 332-0012, Japan
Yusuke Mii
Nara Institute of Science and Technology, 8916-5 Takayama-cho, Ikoma, Nara, 630-0192, Japan
Takuma Shinozuka
Institute of Advanced Medical Sciences, Tokushima University, 3-18-5 Kuramoto-cho, Tokushima, Tokushima, 770-8503, Japan
Tatsuya Takemoto

Authors

Yudai Hatakeyama
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Nen Saito
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Yusuke Mii
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Ritsuko Takada
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Takuma Shinozuka
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Tatsuya Takemoto
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Naoki Honda
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Shinji Takada
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Y.H. performed the majority of experiments, participated in their planning, and wrote the text. N.S. formulated the mathematical concept, conducted computer modeling, and wrote the text. Y.M. participated in the planning of the experiments and the discussion of the results. R.T. performed a part of Western blotting. T.S. participated in the generation of mouse mutants. T.T. generated Wnt reporter mice. H.N. participated in modeling. S.T. formulated the initial key hypothesis, organized all the work, planned and managed experiments, and wrote the text. All authors reviewed and approved the manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Nen Saito or Shinji Takada.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Communications thanks the anonymous reviewers for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Description of Additional Supplementary Files

Supplementary Movie 1

Supplementary Movie 2

Supplementary Movie 3

Supplementary Movie 4

Supplementary Movie 5

Reporting Summary

Source data

Source Data

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hatakeyama, Y., Saito, N., Mii, Y. et al. Intercellular exchange of Wnt ligands reduces cell population heterogeneity during embryogenesis. Nat Commun 14, 1924 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-37350-x

Download citation

Received: 27 January 2022
Accepted: 13 March 2023
Published: 06 April 2023
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-37350-x

This article is cited by

Understanding and manipulating extracellular behaviors of Wnt ligands
- Yusuke Mii
In Vitro Cellular & Developmental Biology - Animal (2024)

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.