Dynamic methylation of histone H3K18 in differentiating Theileria parasites

Cheeseman, Kevin; Jannot, Guillaume; Lourenço, Nelly; Villares, Marie; Berthelet, Jérémy; Calegari-Silva, Teresa; Hamroune, Juliette; Letourneur, Franck; Rodrigues-Lima, Fernando; Weitzman, Jonathan B.

doi:10.1038/s41467-021-23477-2

Download PDF

Article
Open access
Published: 28 May 2021

Dynamic methylation of histone H3K18 in differentiating Theileria parasites

Kevin Cheeseman¹^na1,
Guillaume Jannot¹^na1,
Nelly Lourenço¹^na1,
Marie Villares¹^na1,
Jérémy Berthelet^1,2,
Teresa Calegari-Silva¹,
Juliette Hamroune³,
Franck Letourneur ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0001-9465-4774³,
Fernando Rodrigues-Lima² &
…
Jonathan B. Weitzman ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0001-8445-0102¹

Nature Communications volume 12, Article number: 3221 (2021) Cite this article

4632 Accesses
14 Citations
22 Altmetric
Metrics details

Subjects

Abstract

Lysine methylation on histone tails impacts genome regulation and cell fate determination in many developmental processes. Apicomplexa intracellular parasites cause major diseases and they have developed complex life cycles with fine-tuned differentiation events. Yet, apicomplexa genomes have few transcription factors and little is known about their epigenetic control systems. Tick-borne Theileria apicomplexa species have relatively small, compact genomes and a remarkable ability to transform leucocytes in their bovine hosts. Here we report enriched H3 lysine 18 monomethylation (H3K18me1) on the gene bodies of repressed genes in Theileria macroschizonts. Differentiation to merozoites (merogony) leads to decreased H3K18me1 in parasite nuclei. Pharmacological manipulation of H3K18 acetylation or methylation impacted parasite differentiation and expression of stage-specific genes. Finally, we identify a parasite SET-domain methyltransferase (TaSETup1) that can methylate H3K18 and represses gene expression. Thus, H3K18me1 emerges as an important epigenetic mark which controls gene expression and stage differentiation in Theileria parasites.

An epigenetic map of malaria parasite development from host to vector

Article Open access 14 April 2020

Theileria annulata histone deacetylase 1 (TaHDAC1) initiates schizont to merozoite stage conversion

Article Open access 26 July 2022

Transcriptome-wide dynamics of extensive m6A mRNA methylation during Plasmodium falciparum blood-stage development

Article 05 August 2019

Introduction

Our ability to control infectious diseases is improved by our understanding of their complex life cycles and the characterization of pathogen-specific mechanisms that can be targeted by drug strategies. Apicomplexa parasites are a major cause of disease in humans and domesticated animals across the world. For example, Plasmodium species cause malaria affecting millions of people each year, emphasizing the need for effective drugs targeting parasites^1,2. Cryptosporidium is a major cause of diarrhoea in developing countries following infection from contaminated water supplies and there is currently no effective drug therapy^3,4. Theileria species are bovine-specific pathogens that cause diseases with significant economic impact; Tropical Theileriosis kills over a million cattle per year and costs in the hundreds of millions of dollars. The development of new therapeutic strategies is challenging, as Apicomplexa are eukaryotic cells and share many metabolic pathways with their host animals².

Of all the apicomplexa parasites, Theileria is the only eukaryote known to transform its host cell and constitutes a unique model system to explore parasite–host interactions and microbial tumorigenesis^5,6. Two Theileria species, T. parva and T. annulata are bovine-specific pathogens that cause severe disease following tick transmission. Infection by these Theileria species causes a lymphoproliferative disease in cows with clinical features similar to some human leukaemias^5,7,8. T. annulata infects mainly bovine B cells and macrophages, whereas T. parva infects bovine B and T lymphocytes. Theileria-infected cells are transformed and immortalized; they display uncontrolled proliferation in vitro, independent of exogenous growth factors, and increased ability to migrate and form metastases in immunodeficient mice. Interestingly, Theileria-dependent transformation is reversible; animals treated with the theilericidal drug Buparvaquone are cured in most cases. When Theileria-infected cells are treated in vitro with Buparvaquone, the intracellular parasite diminishes in the host leucocytes, which lose the transformed phenotype, but drug resistance in the field is an emerging concern for disease control. To achieve transformation, the parasite manipulates the host cell signalling pathways that control cell proliferation and survival^5,6,8. Several host signaling pathways have been implicated in Theilieria-induced transformation including metabolic pathways^9,10, c-Jun Nterminal Kinase (JNK) signaling¹¹ and host nuclear factors, such as c-Myc, E2F and AP-1^12,13,14,15. A parasite secreted factor, TaPin1, activates host signaling pathways leading to activation of oncogenic host c-Jun and metabolic gene expression^16,17,18. While previous studies have focused on the host signaling pathways activated by intracellular parasites^6,15, very little is known about the regulation of the parasite genome and the mechanisms that orchestrate parasite differentiation and its complex life cycle. A previous study monitored gene expression through merogony, the process of parasite differentiation from intracellular schizonts to infectious merozoites, and reported interesting changes in the levels of transcription factors of the AP2 family¹⁹. However, the relative paucity of transcription factors in Theileria genomes²⁰ suggests that other mechanisms such as epigenetic pathways may also contribute to parasite differentiation.

Many diseases, especially cancer, are linked to epigenetic events that lead to changes in gene expression. Epigenetic changes associated with disease states include DNA methylation and histone modifications such as lysine methylation and acetylation^21,22. Epigenetic enzymes have been causally linked to many diseases making them promising targets for drug interventions²³. Recently novel drugs that inhibit methylation or deacetylation were developed and some obtained FDA approval to treat cancer. Notably, lysine methylation is emerging as a versatile and dynamic post-translational modification (PTMs) that contributes critically to cellular differentiation programmes²⁴. The human genome encodes about 50 biochemically validated lysine methyltransferases (KMTs) that ‘write’ the methylation code and 20 lysine demethylases (KDMs) that act as ‘erasers’. Numerous reports of misregulation of KMTs and KDMs in cancer drove an intense search for specific small-molecular inhibitors²¹. Despite these advances, relatively little is known about the role of epigenetic proteins (methylation Writers or Erasers) in infectious diseases or in infection-induced cancers^25,26. The posttranslational modification of lysine residues in the histone N-terminal tails plays an important role in regulating chromatin structure and gene expression in all eukaryotes²², but has not been previously studied in Theileria parasites. We hypothesized that epigenetic modifications, particularly lysine methylation of histone tails, could be a feature of parasite differentiation and that the characterization of parasite encoded epigenetic enzymes could be future drug targets for anti-parasite therapies. In this work we describe the role of methylation of histone H3K18 as an important gene regulatory event during the differentiation of Theileria parasites and identify the first parasite methyltransferase capable of methylating H3K18.

Results

Parasite histones are methylated at H3K18

To initiate a study of epigenetic regulation in Theileria parasites, we examined parasite histones focusing on H3. Our analysis of the T. annulata genome revealed the presence of two genes encoding histone H3 (Supplementary Fig. 1). The sequences of the N-terminal tails, especially the Lysine residues, are particularly well-conserved in the H3 proteins from T. annulata, T. parva and mammals (Supplementary Fig. 1). We, therefore, examined histone modifications using a panel of commercial antibodies recognizing different modified lysine residues in H3 tails. Many of the antibodies we tested by immunofluorescence staining showed strong signals in both host and parasite nuclei; these included relatively well-studied marks such as H3K4me3 and H3K36me3 (see below). However, one modification caught our attention: antibodies recognizing mono-methylated H3K18 (H3K18me1) detected T. annulata parasite nuclei, but did not stain bovine host nuclei (Fig. 1a, b). We conducted a series of experiments to pursue the specificity of this initial observation. In contrast to H3K18me1, antibodies against acetylated H3K18 (H3K18ac) displayed strong immunofluorescence signals in both host and parasite nuclei in infected and non-infected bovine B cells (Fig. 1a, b). We observed similar parasite-specific staining for H3K18me1, but not for H3K18Ac, in T. annulata-infected macrophages TaC12 (Fig. 1c, d) and in lymphocytes infected with related T. parva parasites (Supplementary Fig. 2). Further control experiments with three independent antibodies demonstrated the specificity of the antibody for mono-methylated H3K18 residues, with no cross-reaction to other well-studied H3 lysine methylations (Supplementary Fig. 3). Notably, the sequence around the H3K18 residue is extremely similar in parasite or bovine histones (Supplementary Fig. 1). The difference in monoisotopic mass between the Serine-22 and Threonine-22 residues is virtually the same as a methyl group (14.01565): so mass spectrometry could not be used effectively to distinguish between parasite and bovine H3K18 modifications. We confirmed the presence of methylated and acetylated H3K18 in TBL3, TpMD409 and TaC12²⁷ parasite-infected cells by immunoblot experiments (Fig. 1e, f and Supplementary Fig. 2b).

**Fig. 1: H3K18 methylation marks parasite nuclei.**

Treatment with the theilericidal drug Buparvaquone (Bup), which kills the parasites, reduced H3K18me1 levels in cell lines infected with T. annulata or T. parva (Fig. 1e, f and Supplementary Fig. 2b). From these experiments, and careful controls, we conclude that H3K18 mono-methylation appears to be a feature of Theileria parasite schizonts.

H3K18me1 is enriched on the gene bodies of repressed genes in Theileria schizonts

Acetylation of H3K18 is a well-studied epigenetic mark linked to gene activation²⁸, whereas no studies have focused on the functional role of H3K18 methylation in gene regulation. Indeed, no specific gene regulatory functions have been ascribed to H3K18me1. To investigate H3K18 modifications on the Theileria genome, we performed chromatin immunoprecipitation followed by sequencing (ChIP-Seq, performed in duplicates, which we subsequently merged upon good replicate correlations, see Supplementary Fig. 5, to generate the figures shown here) with several antibodies and parallel RNASeq transcriptome analysis. Our dual-sequencing in infected TBL3 cells, followed by reading mapping and bioinformatics analysis, allowed us to simultaneously map epigenomic features on both the parasite and the bovine host genomes. Our analysis of the parasite epigenome revealed some patterns previously described on mammalian genomes; namely, promoter regions around the transcriptional start site (TSS) were enriched for ‘activating’ epigenetic marks such as H3K4me3 or H3K18ac in the parasite genome (Fig. 2a). In contrast, H3K18me1 levels were lowest at the TSS and enriched on the gene bodies (Fig. 2a). Analysis of the bovine genome in the same ChIP-Seq experiments showed enrichment for H3K4me3 and H3K18ac on promoter regions, but no H3K18me1 enrichment on gene bodies, consistent with the parasite-specific immunofluorescence staining results (Supplementary Fig. 4a, b). Gene-body enrichment on actively transcribed genes is a feature of H3K36me3 methylation in mammals²⁹. We observed gene-body enrichment for H3K36me3 on genes in the parasite genome (Fig. 2e and Supplementary Fig. 4c). We observed a strong correlation between gene promoter H3K4me3 and H3K18ac, and a weaker correlation between H3K18me1 and H3K36me3 in the parasite genome (Supplementary Fig. 5a–c). The H3K18me1 and H3K36me3 profiles are, however, quite distinct; a differential peak-calling approach on these two modifications revealed differences in the number of peaks (1537 for H3K18me1, 3122 for H3K36me3). We performed k-means clustering analysis of the H3K18me1 profiles on the T. annulata parasite genome and defined five clusters (Fig. 2b). Cluster I and Cluster V had the lowest levels of H3K18me1, whereas Cluster IV genes (1103 genes) were enriched for gene-body H3K18me1 (Fig. 2c). In contrast, H3K36me3 levels were relatively high across all clusters, except Cluster V. Comparison with our RNA-Seq data revealed that Cluster IV genes were characterized by lower gene expression compared to Clusters I–III (Fig. 2d, e). Notably, Cluster IV genes were particularly enriched for gene-body H3K18me1 which appeared mutually exclusive with H3K18ac and correlated with exonic sequences (Fig. 2e and Supplementary Fig. 5d) (p < 0.0001). The genes enriched for H3K18me1 do not appear to cluster on the genome or to the group in particular chromosomal locations (Supplementary Fig. 6). Methylation of parasite H3K36 has been linked to repression of var genes in Plasmodium parasites³⁰, but we did not observe regions of strikingly high H3K36me3 enrichment in the Theileria genome (Supplementary Fig. 6). Hence, gene-body enrichment of the H3K18me1 modification appears to be correlated with repression of a large number of genes in T. annulata schizonts.

**Fig. 2: Mono-methylation of H3K18 is distributed on the gene bodies of repressed genes.**

Parasite differentiation is associated with dynamic changes in H3K18 modifications

In other apicomplexan species, dynamic changes in epigenetic histone modifications accompany changes in gene expression throughout the parasite life cycle^25,26,31. Important work from the Shiels laboratory began to define changes in gene expression in Theileria parasites during stage differentiation and implied roles for the ApiAP2 factors¹⁹. Little is known about the role of epigenetic mechanisms in regulating gene expression during Theileria differentiation. To investigate the dynamics of H3K18 modifications in Theileria parasites, we induced parasite differentiation from schizonts to merozoites (‘merogony’), by the sustained culture of infected macrophages at elevated temperatures³². The induction of merogony was accompanied by a reduction in H3K18me1 staining in some parasite nuclei (Fig. 3a). After 8 days in the culture at 41 °C, we observed large patches of parasite nuclei with reduced H3K18me1 staining, despite robust H3K4me3 staining across all nuclei (Supplementary Figs. 7 and 8). This suggested that H3K18 methylation dynamics might contribute to parasite differentiation. Unfortunately, there are currently no genetic techniques available to modify the Theileria genome, so we are limited to pharmacological intervention. To test H3K18 dynamics experimentally, we treated cells with inhibitors of lysine demethylases (KDMi) or deacetylases (KDACi), some of the many drugs being developed to inhibit epigenetic enzymes²³. Treatment with a demethylase inhibitor led to a 3-fold increase in parasite H3K18me1 levels and a modest decrease in H3K18ac (Fig. 3b). Conversely, treatment with an acetylase inhibitor robustly increased H3K18ac staining in parasites (Fig. 3b). Importantly, treatment with KDMi or KDACi did not affect the levels of parasite staining with antibodies against H3K4me3 or H3K36me3 (Fig. 3b), demonstrating that the inhibitors do not have a general broad effect on histone lysine methylation. With these pharmacological tools in hand, we sought to test whether these drug-induced effects on H3K18 methylation and acetylation could influence parasite differentiation. We speculate that increased H3K18 methylation might block differentiation, or increased acetylation might favour differentiation. We observed that KDMi treatment significantly reduced the extent of merogony and reduced the expression of the differentiation marker TamR1³² (Fig. 4a). Conversely, treatment with KDACi enhanced TamR1 expression, with a relatively mild impact on differentiation (Fig. 4a). These results suggested that dynamic changes in the H3K18 methylation/acetylation balance could affect parasite stage differentiation.

**Fig. 3: H3K18 methylation is dynamic across stage transitions.**

**Fig. 4: Pharmacological treatments impact parasite differentiation.**

Previous microarray analysis identified sets of genes associated with life-stage transitions in T. annulata¹⁹. Comparison with these data revealed that Cluster IV genes, which are enriched for genebody H3K18me1, are over-represented in differentially expressed genes linked to the sporozoite-tomacroschizont and macroschizont-to-merozoite stage transitions (Fig. 4b and Supplementary Fig. 8). Notably, nine genes encoding Theileria ApiAP2 genes that could be stage-transition determinants¹⁹ are also in the list of cluster IV genes (Supplementary Table 3). We analysed the overlap between these datasets, focusing on Cluster IV genes and correlations with genes reported to be downregulated in the sporozoite-to-macroschizont (S2M) transition and upregulated in macroschizont-to-merozoite (M2M) transition. We identified 20 candidate genes (that belong to both M2M_up and S2M_down gene sets, which we termed M2M1-M2M20) that are candidates for genes that are repressed by high H3K18me1 in macroschizonts and upregulated upon differentiation (Fig. 4b and Supplementary Table 1). We also performed a Blast2GO re-annotation of the additional 67 genes that are in the M2M_up group and contained in Cluster IV (Supplementary Table 2). Notably, the 87 genes on these lists (which are candidates for increased expression during the transition from macroschizont to merozoite) include several genes with FAINT domains and signal peptides or transmembrane domains that could be involved in host interactions. It is particularly noteworthy that three proteins (TA05870, TA16660 and TA19445) are homologues of rhoptry proteins characterized in Plasmodium or Toxoplasma as functionally linked to invasion and egress (Supplementary Tables 1 and 2). Gene expression analysis showed that 5 of these 20 genes are indeed significantly induced (over 10-fold) in our hands upon merogony culture conditions (Supplementary Fig. 9a). In contrast, control genes (e.g. parasite TaJmjC1) or bovine genes encoding actin or Hsp70 did not significantly vary upon merogony induction (Supplementary Fig. 9b). We tested whether the drugs that affected H3K18 methylation and acetylation levels could impact the expression of the M2M genes and noted a significant tendency to be induced by treatment with KDACi (see examples in Supplementary Fig. 9c). We chose to study the M2M13 gene (TA16660 encoding a homologue of rhoptry neck proteins) as a striking example (Fig. 4c). The M2M13 gene was induced 60-fold upon merogony differentiation compared to cells grown at 37 °C (Fig. 4c). The temperature-induced expression of M2M13 was blunted by treatment with KDMi at 41 °C (Fig. 4c). To test whether these changes in expression were linked to changes in epigenetic effects and chromatin marks, we performed ChIP analysis of the M2M13 gene locus (Fig. 5a). The M2M13 gene has a peak of H3K18Ac in the promoter region and enriched H3K18me1 across the gene body (Fig. 5a). Treatment with KDMi enhanced H3K18me1 on the M2M13 gene body and promoter (Fig. 5b), whereas the KDACi treatment led to increased H3K18ac on the promoter region (Fig. 5c). This pharmacological intervention changed H3K18 modifications that correlated with gene expression and differentiation (Fig. 4e). Thus, the balance between H3K18me1 on gene bodies and H3K18ac on gene promoters could determine the expression of key genes associated with differentiation stage transitions in Theileria parasites.

**Fig. 5: Chromatin analysis of a differentiation gene.**

The Theileria SET-domain methyltransferase TaSETup1 can methylate H3K18

The methylation of lysine residues is typically performed by methyltransferases with a characteristic SET domain³³. We mined the T. annulata genome²⁰ for genes encoding SET-domain containing proteins and identified five candidates (termed here TaSETup1–TaSETup5) (Supplementary Fig. 10 and Supplementary Table 4). Our analysis of expression levels showed that only one of these, the uncharacterized protein TaSETup1, was expressed in macroschizonts and significantly silenced upon merogony differentiation (Fig. 6a). We also identified two potential demethylases with JMJ domains, one of which was induced upon merogony (Supplementary Fig. 10a, b). These observations are consistent with a methylation shift during differentiation. We performed phylogenetic analysis of the parasite putative methyltransferases and found that TaSETup1 resembles a family of mammalian methyltransferases called SMYD^34,35,36 proteins that have been implicated in differentiation and cancer (Supplementary Fig. 11). We used knowledge of SMYD protein structure and function to predict residues whose mutation would lead to a catalytically inactive protein (Fig. 6b, c)³⁴. Modelling on the known structure of the mammalian SMYD3³⁷ protein predicted that mutation of the histidine residue at position 206 should inhibit activity. We performed a highly sensitive, in vitro SAM methyltransferase assays³⁸ with recombinant TaSETup1 or mutant H206F. Recombinant TaSETup1 could methylate peptides corresponding to H3K18 residues to produce H3K18me1 and H3K18me2/3, whereas the H206F mutant was inactive (Fig. 7a, b). Furthermore, the recombinant TaSETup1 protein methylated core histones (Fig. 7a) as well as recombinant histone H3 or human nucleosomes (Supplementary Fig. 12a–c). We compared the activity of TaSETup1 with SMYD3, the most similar mammalian SET-domain enzyme. Recombinant TaSETup1 could methylate H3K18me1 on recombinant H3, polynucleosomes or core histone isolated from HEK cells (Supplementary Fig. 13a). In contrast, the related SMYD3 enzyme failed to methylate any of these substrates on K18. But the SMYD3 protein could methylate its preferred substrate MAP3K2³⁹ in an in vitro SAM assay (Supplementary Fig. 13b), whereas TaSETup1 could not. Finally, we performed mass spectrometry analysis of histone peptides methylated by the recombinant TaSETup1 enzyme and demonstrated that the parasite enzyme catalyzed monomethylation of the lysine residue corresponding to H3K18 (Supplementary Fig 14). Thus, these two highly related methyltransferases exhibit a degree of specificity for different target substrates. No human methyltransferase has been demonstrated to methylate H3K18.

**Fig. 6: The *Theileria* methyltransferase TaSETup1.**

**Fig. 7: The *Theileria* TaSETup1 can methylate H3K18 and repress gene expression.**

The genetic tools do not currently exist to test TaSETup1 function in live parasites by mutational analysis or knockdown strategies. We attempted to make antibodies that specifically recognized the TaSETup1 protein. Although we obtained antisera that recognized the immunizing antigen and recombinant TaSETup1 protein, these antibodies failed to produce satisfying results in immunoblot or immunofluorescence analysis. To circumvent these constraints, we tested the functional capacity of TaSETup1 to repress gene expression in a heterologous system as H3K18me1 was enriched on the gene bodies of repressed genes. We fused the parasite gene to a GAL4 protein and tested its repressive activity in the T-REx system⁴⁰ in which HEK293 T-REx cells contain a stably integrated luciferase (Luc) reporter gene under the control of the thymidine kinase (TK) basal promoter with five GAL4 UAS (Supplementary Fig. 15). Tetracycline-induction led to a significant decrease in luciferase expression linked to TaSETup1, which was lost when the mutant H206F was used (Fig. 7c and Supplementary Fig. 15). Additional experiments using flow cytometry sorting (FACS) of low and high H3K18me1 populations during merogony supported our conclusions that parasite differentiation is accompanied by dynamic changes in histone methylation and changes in TaSETup1 expression (Supplementary Fig. 16).

Discussion

The role of epigenetic mechanisms and histone post-translational modifications in regulating gene transcription and cellular differentiation is well-established for a broad range of mammalian genomes and model organisms^21,22. Indeed, the enzymes responsible for methylating or acetylating lysine residues in histone tails are identified as targets for drug therapies in a wide range of human pathologies including cancer. However, relatively little is known about how parasite genomes are regulated and the mechanisms controlling differentiation. The paucity of transcription factors in the apicomplexan genomes, suggests that epigenetic mechanisms could play key regulatory roles^25,26.

This study presents the first insights into how dynamic changes in epigenetic marks might regulate gene expression and stage differentiation in Theileria parasites. We report the first characterization of mono-methylation of the H3K18 residue in parasite histone tails. Our experimental evidence includes immunofluorescence staining of individual cells and immunoblot analysis with three independent and specific antibodies, reinforced by flow cytometry experiments and mass spectrometry analysis with a candidate recombinant methyltransferase enzyme. The H3K18me1 was observed in B cells and macrophages infected with either T. annulata or T. parva parasites and decreased upon treatment with the thericidal Buparvaquone drug. These results suggest that H3K18 methylation is a general marker of Theileria schizonts. Future experiments with primary clinical samples from infected cows will be interesting to test when the H3K18me1 appears during the parasite life cycle. Our experiments with parasite differentiation towards merozoites suggest that H3K18me1 may prevent merogony and advancement through the parasite life cycle. Our results are consistent with a model in which the repressive function of H3K18me1 is lost on some loci during the differentiation to merozoites and that this allows the upregulation of a subclass of merogony-associated genes. Notably, the 87 proteins in the M2M_up:Cluster IV group include several potential secreted proteins (including Tpr and SfiI gene families) as well as three candidates resembling rhoptry proteins (TA05870, TA16660, and TA19445) which are good candidates for proteins involved in the invasion. We characterized the M2M13 gene encoding a potential rhoptry neck protein as a test case. The observation that expression of these M2M genes and merogony are affected by drug treatments (KDMi inhibitors) suggests that these drugs may be potential anti-parasite reagents that merit testing using in vivo models of infection.

Currently, relatively little is known about gene regulation in Theileria genomes. There is a paucity of transcription factors in all apicomplexan genomes. It is possible that some of the Theileria ApiAP2 genes could be stage-transition determinants¹⁹, and it is noteworthy that some are also in the list of cluster IV genes (Supplementary Table 3). This is interesting as ApiAP2 changes have been linked to Theileria differentiation and the PfAP2-G homologue drives an epigenetically regulated master switch that initiates gametocytogenesis in Plasmodium^19,41,42. The link between epigenetic and transcription factor networks in regulating parasite differentiation merits further investigation.

In addition to the novel H3K18me1 epigenetic mark, we identified TaSETup1 as the first SET-domain enzyme capable of H3K18 mono-methylation and the first characterized epigenetic actor in the Theileria genome. As there are only five SET-domain proteins in Theileria genomes, it is likely that parasite methyltransferases are multifunctional, with diverse substrate specificities. Furthermore, there is an emerging interest in non-histone targets⁴³ and TaSETup1 homologues in other apicomplexa species that may have non-histone substrates. Interestingly, the Toxoplasma homologue TgAKMT is a cytoplasmic protein important for parasite motility^44,45 and the Plasmodium homologue PfSET7 can methylate H3K4 and H3K9, but also has cytoplasmic functions⁴⁶. Nonetheless, H3K18 methylation has been detected in these parasites³¹ and these enzymes could have both cytoplasmic and nuclear functions depending on the parasite life stage. Indeed, TaSETup1 resembles SMYD proteins that have both cytoplasmic and nuclear targets and functions³⁴. Studies of parasite epigenetics shed new light on gene regulation mechanisms; another example is the recent discovery of mono-methylated H4K31⁴⁷ in Toxoplasma parasites. Methyltransferases represent versatile regulatory enzymes and the drugs²³ being developed to block methylation in cancers could be repurposed for infectious diseases. The study of epigenetic regulation in Theileria is likely to be rich and fruitful⁴⁸ and our results already suggest that targeting the methylation machinery to block merogony could be a promising therapeutic strategy.

Methods

Cell culture and treatment

All bovine cell lines were previously documented: TBL3 cells were derived from in vitro infection of the spontaneous bovine B lymphosarcoma cell line, BL3, with Hissar stock of T. annulata. TaC12²⁷ is a line of T. annulata-infected bovine macrophages. The TpMD409 lymphocyte cell line is infected with T. parva. Cells were cultured in RPMI 1640 (Gibco-BRL), supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated foetal bovine serum (FBS), 4 mM l-glutamine, 25 mM HEPES, 10 mM β-mercaptoethanol and 100 mg/ml of penicillin/streptomycin in a humidified 5% CO₂ atmosphere at 37 °C. HEK 293T-RexLuc cells were grown in DMEM supplemented with 10% FBS and 100 mg/ml of penicillin/streptomycin in a humidified 5% CO₂ atmosphere at 37 °C. The anti-parasite drug Buparvaquone (BW720c) was used at 50 ng/ml for 48 h (Chemos GmbH, ref: 88426-33-9). The KDM inhibitor (KDMi) is the well-characterized, broad-spectrum lysine demethylase inhibitor tranylcypromine (TCP) (a generous gift from A. Mai, Sapienza University, Rome) used at 1 µM, 48H and the KDAC inhibitor (KDACi) 24 h at 40 nM (compound FR235222, a generous gift from MA. Hakimi). The KDM inhibitor (KDMi) is used at 1 µM, 48 h and the KDAC inhibitor (KDACi) 24 h at 40 nM (compound fr235222 from MA. Hakimi, IAB, Grenoble, France).

Merogony induction

Macroschizont-infected TaC12 cells were induced to differentiate to merogony by increasing the culture temperature to 41 °C³². Cells were passaged each time they reached confluence and 2 × 10⁶ cells collected at day 0 (macroschizont stage) and day 8 (merogony stage) for RNA extraction and 4 × 10³ cells per immunofluorescence at the same time-points.

Immunofluorescence analysis

Cultured T. annulata-infected macrophages (TaC12) or B cells (TBL3) were washed with PBS containing 1 mM EDTA and 3 × 10⁴ cells per slide were centrifuged with Cytospin (10 min at 277×g) to adhere to the slide. Cells were fixed in 3.7% paraformaldehyde for 15 min and subsequently permeabilised in 0.2% Triton X-100 (prepared in PBS) for 10 min. Fixation, permeabilisation and all the following steps were carried out at room-temperature. Slides were blocked with PBS 0.2% Tween (PBST)–1% BSA for 30 min. Primary antibodies were diluted in PBST and incubated for 1 h at the following dilutions: rabbit anti-H3K18me1 (ab177253, Abcam), 1:5000; rabbit anti-H3K18ac (9675S, Cell signaling) 1:800, rabbit anti-H3K4me3 (pAb-003-050, Diagenode) 1:200. Cells were subsequently washed three times with PBST and incubated with secondary antibody for 30 min at the following dilutions: Alexa594-conjugated donkey anti-rabbit antibody, 1:1000. Cells were washed three times with PBST and finally, mounted on coverslips adding ProLong Diamond Antifade Mountant with DAPI mounting reagent (Thermo Fischer Scientific). Samples were analysed using a Leica DMI 6000 epifluorescence microscope. Images were generated and processed using Metamorph and ImageJ software. For H3K18ac and H3K18me1 intensity quantification in the parasite, for each cell, we calculated the mean intensity in the entire parasite using ICY software, divided by the number of parasite nuclei per host cell. The counting of cells in the macroschizont or merogony stage was done using ImageJ. We defined a threshold for the Schizont/Merogony cycle stage, at 80 parasites per cell.

Protein extraction and Western blot analysis

For all the cell lines, 2 × 10⁷ cells were collected and histone extraction was performed using the Abcam Kit protocol. Histones were resolved on NuPage 4–12% acrylamide gradient SDS–PAGE gel (Invitrogen) and transferred onto nitrocellulose membranes in Tris–glycine transfer buffer. Membranes were blocked and incubated overnight at 4 °C with the primary antibodies: H3K18me1(ab177253) 1:20,000; H3K18ac (ab1191) 1:2000; H3 (ab1791) 1:10,000. Membranes were incubated with the appropriate secondary antibody coupled to horseradish peroxidase (HRP), revealed using West Dura kit and the Licor detection system.

Luciferase reporter activity

HEK 293T-RexLuc cells were grown in DMEM supplemented with FBS Tetracycline-free (EuroBio) and transfected with the pcDNA4-TO-Gal4-G9a, pcDNA4-TO-Gal4-TaSetup1, pcDNA4-TO-Gal4-PrSet7, and pcDNA4-TO-Gal4-TaSETup1-H207F plasmids using lipofectamine 2000. The proteins were induced 5 h post-transfection with Tetracycline (final concentration of 1 µg/ml). Transfection efficiencies were normalized to Renilla activity by co-transfection of a pRL-TK Renilla reporter plasmid at 150 ng. Luciferase assays were performed 36 h post-induction using the Dual-Glo Luciferase assay system (Promega) in a microplate luminometer. The percentage of luciferase activity was represented as the ratio Firefly/Renilla luminescence, compared with the non-induced transfected cells.

Plasmids and transfection

pCDNA4-TO-Gal4-G9a and pcDNA4-TO-Gal4-PrSet7 were a gift from S. Ait-Si-Ali. pcDNA4-TO-Gal4TaSETup1 and pcDNA4-TO-Gal4-TaSETup1-H207F were generated from pcDNA4-TO-Gal4-G9a cloning TaSETup1 cDNA from Theileria infected macrophages RNA, with restriction enzymes EcoRI and NotI. Each plasmid was transfected in HEK 293T-RexLuc cells with Lipofectamine 2000 in a concentration gradient (0.5, 1 and 2 µg). pRL-TK Renilla reporter plasmid was co-transfected at 150 ng.

RNA extraction and RT-qPCR

For all cell conditions, total RNA was extracted using a Nucleospin RNA extraction kit (MachereyNagel) following the manufacturer’s protocol. 1 µg of total RNA was reverse transcribed with Superscript III Reverse transciptase Kit (Invitrogen). Real-time quantitative PCR was performed to analyse relative gene expression levels using SyberGreen Master Mix (Applied Biosystem) following the manufacturer’s protocol. Relative expression values were normalized with housekeeping gene mRNA HSP70. Primer sequences are listed in Supplementary Table 5.

RNA-Seq analysis

5 × 10⁶ cells (BL3 or TBL3) were used as starting material to extract RNA. Extraction was performed following the TRI-reagent (SIGMA, T-9424) protocol. Library preparation and sequencing were performed at the GenomIC’ sequencing facility (https://www.institutcochin.fr/core_facilities/genomesequencing-studies?set_language=en). Briefly, poly-A Library preparation was done using the Illimuna TrueSeq stranded protocol and paired end 75 bp sequencing was performed on a Illumina NextSeq 500 to a depth of over 40M reads per sample. Read-quality control was performed using fastQC (v0.11.7) and Rsubread⁴⁹ (v1.26.1) qualityScore function. Read mapping was performed using the Rsubread align function on an indexed version of T. annulata genome assembly ASM322v1.32. RPKM values were obtained using the featureCounts function from the Rsubread package using the same ASM322v1.32 annotations. Visualisation and snapshots of bam files were performed using IGV (v2.3.91) and further modified using inkscape (v0.92.3). Kruskal–Wallis and pairwise Wilcoxon Statistical testing on RPKM values from cluster I–V was performed using the ggpubr (v0.2) R package.

Chromatin immunoprecipitation and next-generation sequencing

BL3 and TBL3 cells (2 × 10⁷) were fixed for 10 min with 1% formaldehyde at room temperature. Fixation was stopped with 125 mM glycine for 5 min. Fixed cells were washed 2× with cold PBS. After washes, cells were resuspended in 1 ml cell lysis buffer (Hepes pH 7.8 25 mM, MgCl₂ 1.5 mM, KCl 10 mM, DTT 1 mM, NP-40 0.1%), incubated on ice for 10 min, centrifuged (492×g, 5 min, 4 °C) before resuspension in 1 ml Nuclear Lysis Buffer (Hepes pH 7.9 50 mM, NaCl 140 mM, EDTA 1 mM, Triton X100 1%, Na-deoxycholate 0.1%, SDS 0.5%). After the nuclei were obtained, the chromatin was sheared with a Bioruptor pico to yield 100–400 bp DNA fragments; the sonication conditions were high intensity 30 s ON/30 s OFF, for 12 min. Following centrifugation (10 min, 24,104×g) the supernatant was used for immunoprecipitation. Sheared chromatin were incubated overnight at 4 °C with anti-H3K18me1 (Abcam 177253), anti-H3K18Ac (Cell Signaling 9675S), anti-H3K4me3 (Millipore 07-473), anti-H3K36me3 (ab9050), or IgG isotype control (Cell Signaling 27295). The immunoprecipitation was carried out using Dynabeads protein G (Thermo Fisher Scientific) for 3 h at 4 °C. Immunoprecipitates were washed four times with IP buffer, once with wash buffer (Tris pH 8 20 mM, LiCl 250 mM, EDTA 1 mM, NP-40 0.5%, Na-deoxycholate 0.5%), and twice with elution buffer (Tris pH 8 20 mM, EDTA 1 mM). Ten immunoprecipitated chromatin was eluted by incubating beads with elution buffer supplemented with 1% SDS at 65 °C. Both input and ChIP DNA were then treated with RNase A for 1 h at 37 °C, followed by the addition of Proteinase K and overnight incubation at 65 °C to reverse cross-link. DNA was then purified with NucleoSpin Gel and PCR clean-up kit (MachereyNagel) following the manufacturer’s instructions.

ChIP-Seq libraries were prepared using the MicroPlex v2 kit (Diagenode) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. 10 µl of DNA material was used and a 10-cycle PCR was performed as a final amplification of the libraries. Libraries were sequenced on a NextSeq 500 system (Illumina). A 75-base single-end run was performed, with the libraries loaded as a 2pM equimolar pool with 1% of internal control sequences (PhiX–Illumina). 594 million reads were generated with Q30 = 86.37%. Raw reads were converted to Fastq files and their quality assessed using Aozan (version 2.2.1)39. Read-quality control was performed using fastQC (v0.11.7) and Rsubread⁴⁹ (v1.26.1) quality score function. Read mapping was performed using the Rsubread align function on an indexed version of Theileria annulata genome assembly ASM322v1.32. Biological replicates correlation was assessed using PCA and Spearman/Pearson correlation coefficient computation using deepTools⁵⁰ (v3.1.1) bamCoverage, multiBamSummary and plotCorrelation tools. K-means clustering on H3K18me1 ChIPseq analysis was performed using the computeMatrix and plotHeatmap tools. Circos plot of ChIP-seq and RNA-seq experiment was done using circlize⁵¹ (v0.4.5).

Gene set overlaps

Representation factor and associated probability between genes from Cluster IV and stage-specific differentially expressed genes (from reported study¹⁹) were calculated using the software available at http://nemates.org/MA/progs/overlap_stats.html. Briefly, the representation factor corresponds to the number of overlapping genes divided by the expected number of overlapping genes drawn from two independent groups. Associated probability was computed using an exact hypergeometric test. Details of the computations can be found at http://nemates.org/MA/progs/representation.stats.html. R and ggplot2 packages were used to produce several figure panels.

Phylogenetic analysis

SET domain proteins were retrieved from interproDBv66⁵² using the SET domain identifier IPR0014. Homo sapiens SET proteins were further curated to include only some representatives of the major SET families. Proteins were aligned using mafft⁵³ v7.245 with option --localpair --maxiterate 1000 --ep 0. Alignment was examined using Jalview⁵⁴ v2.10.5 and phylogenetic tree inferred with Ultra-Fast bootstrap and alrt branch support using iqtree^55,56,57 v1.5.5 with options –m TEST -bb 1000 –alrt 1000. FigTree v1.4.3 was used for tree annotation. Computations were performed using Docker containers available at https://hub.docker.com/u/parisepigenetics/.

Reannotation of parasite genes

T. annulata protein sequences were submitted to the blast2GO⁵⁸ pipeline for annotation using standard parameters.

Cloning and site-directed mutagenesis

Total cellular RNA from infected macrophages (TaC12) was converted to cDNA using Phusion high fidelity DNA polymerase (ThermoFisher). The open reading frame of TaSETup1 (TA06820, piroplasmaDB) (refseq_948938) was PCR amplified with Q5 high fidelity DNA polymerase (NEB) and cloned by BP recombination reaction into entry clone pDONR207 using GATEWAY^® cloning technology. The positive entry clone containing TaSETup1 was shuttled into pDEST17 His Tag Expression vector by LR recombination reaction using GATEWAY^® cloning technology. For site-directed mutagenesis of TaSETup1, Histidine 206 residue was mutated into phenylalanine using Phusion Site-Directed Mutagenesis Kit (Thermofisher). The resulting positive clone was transformed to competent E. coli host HI-control BL21 (DE3) cells for protein expression and purification.

Protein expression and purification

A single colony of pDEST17 TaSETup1 WT, or H206F, was inoculated into 5 ml of LB broth containing 100 µg/ml ampicillin. The overnight culture was transferred to 1 l of fresh medium and was grown at 37 °C until OD value of 0.7 at 600 nm was reached. Isopropyl β-d-1-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG) was added to a final concentration of 750 µM and grown overnight at 16 °C. Cells were harvested by centrifugation at 2490×g for 20 min and the pellet re-suspended for 30 min at 4 °C under agitation in cold lysis buffer (300 mM NaCl in PBS 1×, pH 8, triton 1%, lysozyme 1 mg/ml, 10 mM imidazole, cOmplete^TM Protease Inhibitor Cocktail). The cells were disrupted by sonication on ice and clarified by centrifugation at 16,000×g for 30 min at 4 °C. Proteins carrying the histidine tag were purified using HIS-Select^® Nickel Affinity Gel. Briefly, the clarified lysate was incubated with affinity beads for 3 h at 4 °C under agitation and then transferred to a chromatography column. After extensive washing, the histidine-containing protein was eluted from the column using 5 column volumes of elution buffer (300 mM NaCl in PBS 1×, pH 8, 300 mM Imidazole). Samples were subjected to buffer exchange into the low salt buffer (Tris–HCl 50 mM, NaCl 50 mM, pH 8) using PD-10 Desalting Columns containing Sephadex G25 resin (GE Healthcare). Desalted samples were concentrated using an Amicon Ultra centrifugal filter units (cutoff 10 kDa, EMD Millipore) and subjected to gel filtration using a HiLoad 16/60 Superdex 200 size-exclusion column using an AKTA purifier system (Cytvia). The sample was eluted using the low salt buffer and fractions containing HIS-tagged protein were pooled, concentrated using Amicon Ultra centrifugal filter units (cutoff 10 kDa) and analysed by SDS–PAGE gel electrophoresis and Coomassie staining.

RP-UFLC-based separation and quantification of the fluorescein-labelled peptide substrate of TaSETup1 (FAM-H3K18) and its methylated products (FAM-H3K18me)

A 9-amino-acid peptide derived from the sequence of human histone H3.1 protein and containing the lysine 18 residue was synthesized and conjugated to fluorescein amide (FAM) on its N-terminus and modified by amidation (NH2) on its C-terminus (Proteogenix, France). The lysine 14 was mutated to arginine in order to only monitor lys-18 TaSETup1-dependent methylation. The peptide was as follows: FAM- RAPRK₁₈QLAT-NH2. A mono, di, and tri-methylated different forms of H3K18 (H3K18_me1/me2/me3) peptide was also synthesized and used as standard. The lysine methyltransferase reaction was carried out overnight at room temperature in methylation buffer (Tris 50 mM pH 8, 50 mM NaCl, 1 mM DTT) containing 75 µM of the peptide substrate, 3 µM of enzyme and with or without 200 µM of S-Adenosyl methionine (SAM). Samples containing H3K18 peptide (substrate) and its methylated forms (products) were separated by RP-UFLC (Shimadzu) using Kromasil 100-5-C18 column 4.6 × 250 mm, 5 µm particle size at 40 °C. The mobile phase used for the separation consisted of two solvents. Solvent A containing water with 0.1% perchloric acid (HClO₄) and solvent B containing acetonitrile with 0.12% trifluoacetic acid (TFA). Separation was performed by an isocratic flow as followed: 80% A/20% B, rate of 1 ml/min, time of run = 27 min. H3K18 peptide (substrate) and its methylated forms (products) were monitored by the fluorescence emission (λ = 530 nm) after excitation at λ = 485 nm and quantified by integration of the peak absorbance area, employing a calibration curve established with various known concentrations of peptides.

Histone methyltransferase in vitro assays

Recombinant histone H3 (NEB), H3 from calf Thymus (Sigma), or core histone purified from chicken erythrocytes (Sigma) (500 ng) were mixed with or without S-adenosyl methionine (100 µM final) in 1× HMT buffer containing 50 mM Tris pH 8.0, 20 mM KCl, 5 mM MgCl2, 5% glycerol, 1 mM DTT in a final volume of 25 μl and incubated at room temperature for 2 h. Samples mixtures were immobilized on nitrocellulose membrane using Bio-Dot^®microfiltration apparatus (Bio-Rad) and blocked with 5% non-fat milk in TBS-Tween for 1 h. After three washes, membranes were incubated with antibodies against H3 (1:2000), H3K18me1 (1:1000), at 4 °C overnight. Membranes were washed three times for 10 min and incubated with a 1:5000 dilution of horseradish peroxidase-conjugated anti-rabbit antibody for 1 h at room temperature and developed with the Pierce ECL Western Blotting Substrate according to the manufacturer’s protocol.

Sample preparation for LC–MS/MS analysis

50 µg of an H3-derived 14-mer peptide flanking the lysine 18 (GGKAPRKQLATKAA-NH2, Proteogenix) were incubated with 3 µg TaSETup1 and with or without 1 mM SAM for 2 h at room temperature. The reaction was then stopped by cooling and the samples were analysed by LC–MS/MS as follows.

LC–MS/MS acquisition

The peptide solution was desalted using ZipTip µ-C18 Pipette Tips (Millipore) and analysed by an Orbitrap Tribrid Fusion mass spectrometer in positive mode (Thermo Scientific) coupled to a Nano-LC Proxeon 1200 equipped with a NSI EASY-spray ion source (Thermo Scientific). Peptides were separated by liquid chromatography with the following parameters: Acclaim PepMap100 C18 pre-column reversed-phase (2 cm, 3 μm, 100 Å), EASY-spray C18 column reversed phase (P/N ES805A, 75 cm, 75 μm, 2 μm, 100 Å), 300 nl/min flow rate, gradient from 95% solvent A (water, 0.1% formic acid) to 40% solvent B (80% acetonitrile, 0.1% formic acid) over a period of 120 min, followed by a column regeneration of 20 min, giving a total run time of 140 min. Peptides were analysed in the Orbitrap cell, in full ion scan mode, at a resolution of 120,000 with a mass range of m/z 350–1550 and an AGC target of 4 × 105. Fragments were obtained by high collision-induced dissociation (HCD) activation with a collisional energy of 27%, and a quadrupole isolation window of 1.6 Da. MS/MS data were acquired in the Ion trap in a Top-Speed mode with 3 s cycles, with an AGC target of 1 × 104 and with a dynamic exclusion of 60 s. MS/MS of most intense precursor were firstly acquired. Peptides with charge states = 1–8 and unassigned charge states were included for the acquisition. The maximum ion accumulation times were set to 100 ms for MS acquisition and 35 ms for MS/MS acquisition.

LC–MS/MS data processing

The LC–MS/MS.raw files were processed using the Sequest search engine of Proteome Discoverer 2.4 (Thermo Fisher Scientific). The peptide identification was done in No-enzyme mode with a custom database containing only the peptide sequence. The precursor mass tolerance was set to 7 ppm and the fragment mass tolerance to 0.5 Da. Validation of spectra was done with the “Fixed value PSMs validator” node, which performs validation of PSMs (Peptide Spectrum Matches) based on score thresholds defined for the search nodes.

On proteome Discoverer 2.4, the following dynamic modifications were searched: Methylation (K), Dimethylation (K), Trimethylation (K), amidated (C-terminus of peptide) and HCysThiolactone (K).

Characterization of H3K18me1 antibody specificity

2 µg of 5-FAM coupled short peptides (Proteogenix) flanking the unmodified, monomethylated, dimethylated, trimethylated or acetylated lysine of interest (H3K4: ARTKQTARRSK, H3K9: RQTARKSTGG, H3K14: STGGKAPRR, H3K18: RAPRKQLAT, H3K27: TKAARKSAPAT and H3K36:

TGGVKRPHR) were transfered on nitrocellulose membrane using Bio-Dot^®microfiltration apparatus (Bio-Rad) and blocked with 5% non-fat milk in PBS-Tween for 1 h. Membranes were then incubated with antibodies against H3K18me1 (Abcam #ab177253, Active Motif #31259 and a home-made antibody provided by Jane Mellor’s laboratory) (1:10,000) or H3K36me3 (Abcam #ab9050) (1:10,000) at 4 °C overnight. Membranes were washed three times with PBS-Tween for 10 min and incubated with a 1:20,000 dilution of horseradish peroxidase-conjugated anti-rabbit antibody for 1 h at room temperature. Membranes were finally developed with the Pierce ECL Western Blotting Substrate according to the manufacturer’s protocol.

Flow cytometry analysis

Cells were washed once with PBS and then fix overnight in 0.5% PFA in PBS at 4 °C. After centrifugation (5 min at 300×g, 4 °C), cells were washed in PBS, recentrifuged and resuspended in 0.1% Triton-X (5 min) then washed once in FACS Buffer (cold PBS, 20 mM Hepes and 0.5% BSA) Then, primary antibodies were added in FACS buffer and incubated 20 min at 4 °C. Cells were washed with FACS buffer and repeat with secondary antibody (at the same dilution conditions as immunofluorescence experiments above). Cells were washed again with FACS buffer and resuspended in 200 µl of FACS buffer for flow cytometry analysis.

The sequences of all primers and oligonucleotides used in this study are listed in Supplementary Table 5.

Reporting summary

Further information on research design is available in the Nature Research Reporting Summary linked to this article.

Data availability

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in this published article. The RNA-Sequencing and ChIP-Seq data have been deposited to the ENA database with the study identifier #PRJEB33792. The Zenodo access link is provided (https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3370034) DOI number: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3370034. Content description: This repository provides bigwig files for ChIP and RNA sequencing experiments in Theileria annulata. DeepTools generated Coverage files, ReadCount normalised files and SES normalised files are provided. Also provided are genome and annotation files for visualisation with IGV software. The Mass Spectrometry proteomics data were deposited in the ProteomeXchange Consortium via the PRIDE partner repository with the dataset identifier PXD024599. Source data are provided with this paper.

References

Maier, A. G., Matuschewski, K., Zhang, M. & Rug, M. Plasmodium falciparum. Trends Parasitol. 35, 481–482 (2019).
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Carolino, K. & Winzeler, E. A. The antimalarial resistome—finding new drug targets and their modes of action. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 57, 49–55 (2020).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Dumaine, J. E., Tandel, J. & Striepen, B. Cryptosporidium parvum. Trends Parasitol. 36, 485–486 (2020).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Innes, E. A., Chalmers, R. M., Wells, B. & Pawlowic, M. C. A one health approach to tackle Cryptosporidiosis. Trends Parasitol. 36, 290–303 (2020).
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Tretina, K., Gotia, H. T., Mann, D. J. & Silva, J. C. Theileria-transformed bovine leukocytes have cancer hallmarks. Trends Parasitol. 31, 306–314 (2015).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Cheeseman, K. & Weitzman, J. B. Host–parasite interactions: an intimate epigenetic relationship. Cell. Microbiol. 17, 1121–1132 (2015).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Dobbelaere, D. A. E. & Rottenberg, S. Theileria-induced leukocyte transformation. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 6, 377–382 (2003).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Dobbelaere, D. & Heussler, V. Transformation of leukocytes by Theileria parva and T. annulata. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 53, 1–42 (1999).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Medjkane, S., Perichon, M., Marsolier, J., Dairou, J. & Weitzman, J. B. Theileria induces oxidative stress and HIF1α activation that are essential for host leukocyte transformation. Oncogene 33, 1809–1817 (2014).
Metheni, M., Lombès, A., Bouillaud, F., Batteux, F. & Langsley, G. HIF-1α induction, proliferation and glycolysis of Theileria-infected leukocytes. Cell. Microbiol. 17, 467–472 (2015).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Lizundia, R. et al. The JNK/AP-1 pathway upregulates expression of the recycling endosome rab11a gene in B cells transformed by Theileria. Cell. Microbiol. 9, 1936–1945 (2007).
Tretina, K. et al. Theileria parasites subvert E2F signaling to stimulate leukocyte proliferation. Sci. Rep. 10, 3982 (2020).
Dessauge, F. et al. c-Myc activation by Theileria parasites promotes survival of infected Blymphocytes. Oncogene 24, 1075–1083 (2005).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Marsolier, J. et al. OncomiR addiction is generated by a miR-155 feedback loop in Theileria-transformed leukocytes. PLoS Pathog. 9, e1003222 (2013).
Villares, M., Berthelet, J. & Weitzman, J. B. The clever strategies used by intracellular parasites to hijack host gene expression. Semin. Immunopathol. 42, 215–226 (2020).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Marsolier, J., Perichon, M., Weitzman, J. B. & Medjkane, S. Secreted parasite Pin1 isomerase stabilizes host PKM2 to reprogram host cell metabolism. Commun. Biol. 2, 152 (2019).
Marsolier, J. et al. Theileria parasites secrete a prolyl isomerase to maintain host leukocyte transformation. Nature 520, 378–382 (2015).
Medjkane, S. & Weitzman, J. B. Intracellular Theileria parasites PIN down host metabolism. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 8, 134 (2020).
Pieszko, M., Weir, W., Goodhead, I., Kinnaird, J. & Shiels, B. ApiAP2 factors as candidate regulators of stochastic commitment to merozoite production in Theileria annulata. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 9, e0003933 (2015).
Article PubMed PubMed Central CAS Google Scholar
Pain, A. et al. Genome of the host-cell transforming parasite Theileria annulata compared with T. parva. Science 309, 131–133 (2005).
Article ADS CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Husmann, D. & Gozani, O. Histone lysine methyltransferases in biology and disease. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 26, 880–889 (2019).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Jambhekar, A., Dhall, A. & Shi, Y. Roles and regulation of histone methylation in animal development. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 20, 625–641 (2019).
Arrowsmith, C. H., Bountra, C., Fish, P. V., Lee, K. & Schapira, M. Epigenetic protein families: a new frontier for drug discovery. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 11, 384–400 (2012).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Greer, E. L. & Shi, Y. Histone methylation: a dynamic mark in health, disease and inheritance. Nat. Rev. Genet. 13, 343–357 (2012).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Bougdour, A., Braun, L., Cannella, D. & Hakimi, M. A. Chromatin modifications: implications in the regulation of gene expression in Toxoplasma gondii. Cell. Microbiol. 12, 413–423 (2010).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Scherf, A., Lopez-Rubio, J. J. & Riviere, L. Antigenic variation in Plasmodium falciparum. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 62, 445–470 (2008).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Huber, S., Karagenc, T., Ritler, D., Rottenberg, S. & Woods, K. Identification and characterisation of a Theileria annulata proline-rich microtubule and SH3 domain-interacting protein (TaMISHIP) that forms a complex with CLASP1, EB1, and CD2AP at the schizont surface. Cell. Microbiol. 20, e12838 (2018).
Article PubMed PubMed Central CAS Google Scholar
Peterson, C. L. & Laniel, M.-A. Histones and histone modifications. Curr. Biol. 14, R546–R551 (2004).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Li, J., Ahn, J. H. & Wang, G. G. Understanding histone H3 lysine 36 methylation and its deregulation in disease. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 76, 2899–2916 (2019).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Jiang, L. et al. PfSETvs methylation of histone H3K36 represses virulence genes in Plasmodium falciparum. Nature 499, 223–227 (2013).
Article ADS CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Coetzee, N. et al. Quantitative chromatin proteomics reveals a dynamic histone posttranslational modification landscape that defines asexual and sexual Plasmodium falciparum parasites. Sci. Rep. 7, 607 (2017).
Article ADS PubMed PubMed Central CAS Google Scholar
Schmuckli-Maurer, J., Shiels, B. & Dobbelaere, D. A. Stochastic induction of Theileria annulata merogony in vitro by chloramphenicol. Int. J. Parasitol. 38, 1705–1715 (2008).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Dillon, S. C., Zhang, X., Trievel, R. C. & Cheng, X. The SET-domain protein superfamily: protein lysine methyltransferases. Genome Biol. 6, 227 (2005).
Article PubMed PubMed Central CAS Google Scholar
Spellmon, N., Holcomb, J., Trescott, L., Sirinupong, N. & Yang, Z. Structure and function of SET and MYND domain-containing proteins. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 16, 1406–1428 (2015).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Cock-Rada, A. M. et al. SMYD3 promotes cancer invasion by epigenetic upregulation of the metalloproteinase MMP-9. Cancer Res. 72, 810–820 (2012).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Codato, R. et al. The SMYD3 methyltransferase promotes myogenesis by activating the myogenin regulatory network. Sci. Rep. 9, 17298 (2019).
Article ADS PubMed PubMed Central CAS Google Scholar
Xu, S., Wu, J., Sun, B., Zhong, C. & Ding, J. Structural and biochemical studies of human lysine methyltransferase Smyd3 reveal the important functional roles of its post-SET and TPR domains and the regulation of its activity by DNA binding. Nucleic Acids Res. 39, 4438–4449 (2011).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Duval, R. et al. An acetyltransferase assay for CREB-binding protein based on reverse phaseultra-fast liquid chromatography of fluorescent histone H3 peptides. Anal. Biochem. 486, 35–37 (2015).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Dai, B. et al. SET and MYND domain-containing protein 3 is overexpressed in human glioma and contributes to tumorigenicity. Oncol. Rep. 34, 2722–2730 (2015).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Li, G. et al. Jarid2 and PRC2, partners in regulating gene expression. Genes Dev. 24, 368–380 (2010).
Article PubMed PubMed Central CAS Google Scholar
Brancucci, N. M. B. et al. Heterochromatin Protein 1 secures survival and transmission of malaria parasites. Cell Host Microbe 16, 165–176 (2014).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Filarsky, M. et al. GDV1 induces sexual commitment of malaria parasites by antagonizing HP1dependent gene silencing. Science 359, 1259–1263 (2018).
Article ADS CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Carlson, S. M. & Gozani, O. Nonhistone lysine methylation in the regulation of cancer pathways. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Med. 6, a026435 (2016).
Heaslip, A. T., Nishi, M., Stein, B. & Hu, K. The motility of a human parasite, Toxoplasma gondii, is regulated by a novel lysine methyltransferase. PLoS Pathog. 7, e1002201 (2011).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Sivagurunathan, S., Heaslip, A., Liu, J. & Hu, K. Identification of functional modules of AKMT, a novel lysine methyltransferase regulating the motility of Toxoplasma gondii. Mol. Biochem. Parasitol. 189, 43–53 (2013).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Chen, P. B. et al. Plasmodium falciparum PfSET7: enzymatic characterization and cellular localization of a novel protein methyltransferase in sporozoite, liver and erythrocytic stage parasites. Sci. Rep. 6, 21802 (2016).
Article ADS CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Sindikubwabo, F. et al. Modifications at K31 on the lateral surface of histone H4 contribute to genome structure and expression in apicomplexan parasites. Elife 6, e29391 (2017).
Cheeseman, K. & Weitzman, J. B. Host-parasite interactions: an intimate epigenetic relationship. Cell. Microbiol. 17, 1121–1132 (2015).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Liao, Y., Smyth, G. K. & Shi, W. The Subread aligner: fast, accurate and scalable read mapping by seed-and-vote. Nucleic Acids Res. 41, e108 (2013).
Article PubMed PubMed Central CAS Google Scholar
Ramírez, F. et al. deepTools2: a next generation web server for deep-sequencing data analysis. Nucleic Acids Res. 44, W160–W165 (2016).
Article PubMed PubMed Central CAS Google Scholar
Gu, Z., Gu, L., Eils, R., Schlesner, M. & Brors, B. circlize Implements and enhances circular visualization in R. Bioinformatics 30, 2811–2812 (2014).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Mitchell, A. L. et al. InterPro in 2019: improving coverage, classification and access to protein sequence annotations. Nucleic Acids Res. 47, D351–D360 (2018).
Katoh, K. & Standley, D. M. MAFFT multiple sequence alignment software version 7: improvements in performance and usability. Mol. Biol. Evol. 30, 772–780 (2013).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Waterhouse, A. M., Procter, J. B., Martin, D. M. A., Clamp, M. & Barton, G. J. Jalview Version 2—a multiple sequence alignment editor and analysis workbench. Bioinformatics 25, 1189–1191 (2009).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Nguyen, L.-T., Schmidt, H. A., von Haeseler, A. & Minh, B. Q. IQ-TREE: a fast and effective stochastic algorithm for estimating maximum-likelihood phylogenies. Mol. Biol. Evol. 32, 268–274 (2015).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Hoang, D. T., Chernomor, O., von Haeseler, A., Minh, B. Q. & Vinh, L. S. UFBoot2: improving the ultrafast bootstrap approximation. Mol. Biol. Evol. 35, 518–522 (2018).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Kalyaanamoorthy, S., Minh, B. Q., Wong, T. K. F., von Haeseler, A. & Jermiin, L. S. ModelFinder: fast model selection for accurate phylogenetic estimates. Nat. Methods 14, 587–589 (2017).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Gotz, S. et al. High-throughput functional annotation and data mining with the Blast2GO suite. Nucleic Acids Res. 36, 3420–3435 (2008).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by the LabEx “Who Am I?” #ANR-11-LABX-0071 and the Université de Paris IdEx #ANR-18-IDEX-0001 funded by the French Government through its “Investments for the Future” programme, the Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR PATHO-METHYLOME #ANR-15-CE12-0020), and the Plan Cancer “Epigénétique et cancer” 2015 (PARA-CAN #PARA-15-RCA). K.C. was supported by the Fondation pour la Recherche Médicale (#FRMSPF20140129419). J.B.W. is a senior member of the Institut Universitaire de France (IUF). We thank the UMR7216 Bioinformatics platform for computational support. We thank S. Ait-Si-Ali, L. Del Maestro and the UMR7216 Functional Epigenomics platform for advice. We thank the proteomics core facility at the Institut Jacques Monod for the LC–MS/MS experiments, the region Ile-de-France (SESAME), and the Université de Paris and CNRS for funding part of the LC–MS/MS equipment. We thank the technical platform “BioProfiler” (BFA, CNRS UMR 8251, Université de Paris) for providing the UFLC facilities. We thank members of the Weitzman laboratory, M.D. Weitzman and the UMR7216 for discussions and critical reading of the manuscript. We thank G. Langsley (Institut Cochin, Paris, France) for the generous gift of TBL3, BL3 and TpMD409 cells, and K. Woods (University of Bern, Switzerland) for the gift of Tac12 cells. We thank J. Mellor (University of Oxford, UK) for the home-made H3K18me1 antibody. The KDM inhibitor (KDMi) and the KDAC inhibitor (KDACi) were generous gifts from A. Mai (Sapienza University, Rome, Italy) and M.A. Hakimi (IAB, Grenoble, France).

Author information

These authors contributed equally: Kevin Cheeseman, Guillaume Jannot, Nelly Lourenço, Marie Villares.

Authors and Affiliations

Université de Paris, Epigenetics and Cell Fate, CNRS, Paris, France
Kevin Cheeseman, Guillaume Jannot, Nelly Lourenço, Marie Villares, Jérémy Berthelet, Teresa Calegari-Silva & Jonathan B. Weitzman
Université de Paris, Functional and Adaptive Biology, CNRS, Paris, France
Jérémy Berthelet & Fernando Rodrigues-Lima
Université de Paris, Institut Cochin, Inserm, CNRS, Paris, France
Juliette Hamroune & Franck Letourneur

Authors

Kevin Cheeseman
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Guillaume Jannot
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Nelly Lourenço
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Marie Villares
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Jérémy Berthelet
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Teresa Calegari-Silva
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Juliette Hamroune
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Franck Letourneur
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Fernando Rodrigues-Lima
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Jonathan B. Weitzman
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

J.B.W. developed the conceptual framework, sought funding, wrote the manuscript and provided overall supervision. K.C., G.J., N.L., M.V., T.C.S., J.B., J.H., designed and performed experiments, analysed the data and helped write the paper. F.L. and F.R.L. provided supervision and expertise. K.C., G.J., N.L. and M.V. made equal contributions and are listed in alphabetical order.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jonathan B. Weitzman.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Peer review information Nature Communications thanks Karine Le Roch and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Reporting Summary

Source data

Source Data

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cheeseman, K., Jannot, G., Lourenço, N. et al. Dynamic methylation of histone H3K18 in differentiating Theileria parasites. Nat Commun 12, 3221 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-23477-2

Download citation

Received: 31 July 2020
Accepted: 14 April 2021
Published: 28 May 2021
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-23477-2

This article is cited by

Theileria parasites sequester host eIF5A to escape elimination by host-mediated autophagy
- Marie Villares
- Nelly Lourenço
- Jonathan B. Weitzman
Nature Communications (2024)
Histone modification analysis reveals common regulators of gene expression in liver and blood stage merozoites of Plasmodium parasites
- Ashley B. Reers
- Rodriel Bautista
- Evelien M. Bunnik
Epigenetics & Chromatin (2023)
Cancerogenic parasites in veterinary medicine: a narrative literature review
- Niccolò Fonti
- Francesca Parisi
- Alessandro Poli
Infectious Agents and Cancer (2023)
The Hypervariable Tpr Multigene Family of Theileria Parasites, Defined by a Conserved, Membrane-Associated, C-Terminal Domain, Includes Several Copies with Defined Orthology Between Species
- Nicholas C. Palmateer
- James B. Munro
- Joana C. Silva
Journal of Molecular Evolution (2023)
Metabolomic profiling of bovine leucocytes transformed by Theileria annulata under BW720c treatment
- Hong-xi Zhao
- Xia Li
- Xin-gang Dan
Parasites & Vectors (2022)

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.