Abstract
Purpose
To examine the difference in post-operative visual outcomes of cataract surgeries between a tertiary and secondary centre at Aravind Eye Hospitals in Tamil Nadu, India.
Methods
Our retrospective cross-sectional study analysed cataract surgeries at a secondary centre and its associated tertiary centre in 2021. Our main outcome measures were postoperative best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), spherical equivalent, and intraoperative and postoperative complications. Two-sample proportion tests and logistic regression analyses were performed.
Results
The analysis of 32,302 cataract surgeries in 2021 of which 4357 were performed at the secondary centre and 27,945 were performed at the tertiary centre showed that the tertiary centre operated on more advanced cataract condition (p < 0.001). Intraoperative (p < 0.001) and post-operative complication rates (p < 0.001) were higher in the tertiary centre. The odds of effective outcomes (BCVA > = 6/12) controlling for all covariates are poorer (p < 0.0001) in the tertiary centre for both phacoemulsification (phaco) and manual small incision cataract surgeries (MSICS).
Conclusion
World Health Organization recommendations for the effective outcome of cataract surgery are met by both the tertiary and secondary centres, but the odds of effective outcomes in the tertiary centre was lower after adjusting for all known factors. Further investigations of the causes of poor vision in both phaco and MSICS in the tertiary centre are needed to improve the situation.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 18 print issues and online access
$259.00 per year
only $14.39 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
References
Bourne RRA, Steinmetz JD, Saylan M, Mersha AM, Weldemariam AH, Wondmeneh TG, et al. Causes of blindness and vision impairment in 2020 and trends over 30 years, and prevalence of avoidable blindness in relation to VISION 2020: The Right to Sight: An analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study. Lancet Global Health. 2021;9:e144–e160.
Al-Qahtani B, Ahmad F, Alotaibi M, Al-Zughaibi M, Omair A, Al-Jobair K. Cataract surgery outcomes in a Tertiary Hospital Riyadh. J Health Specialties. 2016;4:110.
Vijaya L, George R, Rashima A, Raju P, Arvind H, Baskaran M, et al. Outcomes of cataract surgery in a rural and Urban South Indian population. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2010;58:223–8.
Ferdosh JU, Uddin M, Husain R. Visual outcome after cataract surgery in a tertiary eye hospital of Chittagong district Bangladesh. Asian J Med Biol Res. 2019;5:212–8.
Sparrow JM. Cataract surgery: benchmarks for established and trainee surgeons. Eye. 2008;22:1371–2.
Huang W, Huang G, Wang D, Yin Q, Foster PJ, He M. Outcomes of cataract surgery in urban southern China: The liwan eye study. Investig Ophthalmol Visual Sci. 2011;52:16–20.
Lindfield R, Vishwanath K, Ngounou F, Khanna RC. The challenges in improving outcome of cataract surgery in low and middle income countries. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2012;60:464–9.
Markos CM, Tamrat LT, Asferaw MA. Outcomes and Associated Factors of Cataract Surgery Among Adults Attending a Tertiary Hospital in Addis Ababa Ethiopia. Patient Relat Outcome Meas. 2020;11:231–9.
Congdon N, Yan X, Lansingh V, Sisay A, Müller A, Chan V, et al. Assessment of cataract surgical outcomes in settings where follow-up is poor: PRECOG, a multicentre observational study. The Lancet. Global Health. 2013;1:37–45.
Lewallen S, Thulasiraj RD. Eliminating cataract blindness - how do we apply lessons from Asia to sub-Saharan Africa? Glob Public Health. 2010;5:639–48.
Anon. Blindness and vision impairment. Available at: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/blindness-and-visual-impairment#:~:text=Mild –visual acuity worse than,acuity worse than 3%2F60. [Accessed May 2, 2023].
Subburaman GBB, Hariharan L, Ravilla TD, Ravilla RD, Kempen JH. Demand for Tertiary Eye Care Services in Developing Countries. Am J Ophthalmol. 2015;160:619–627.e1.
Liu Y, Zhong L, Yuan S, van de Klundert J. Why patients prefer high-level healthcare facilities: A qualitative study using focus groups in rural and urban China. BMJ. Global Health. 2018;3:1–11.
Bühn S, Holstiege J, Pieper D. Are patients willing to accept longer travel times to decrease their risk associated with surgical procedures? A systematic review. BMC Public Health. 2020;20:1–10.
Khanna RC, Rathi VM, Guizie E, Singh G, Nishant K, Sandhu S, et al. Factors associated with visual outcomes after cataract surgery: A cross-sectional or retrospective study in Liberia. PLoS One. 2020;15:e0233118.
Ilechie AA, Boadi-Kusi BS, Ndudiri OV, Ofori EA. Evaluation of post-operative visual outcomes of cataract surgery in Ghana. International Journal of Health Research. 2012;5:35–42.
Matta S, Park J, Shantha GPS, Khanna RC, Rao GN. Cataract surgery visual outcomes and associated risk factors in secondary level eye care centers of L V Prasad Eye Institute, India. PLoS ONE. 2016;11:1–11.
WHO Informal Consultation on Analysis of Blindness Prevention Outcomes (1998: Geneva, Switzerland) & WHO Programme for the Prevention of Blindness and Deafness.(1998). Informal Consultation on Analysis of Blindness Prevention Outcomes, Geneva, 16-18 16-18 February 1998. World Health Organization. WHO PBL Geneva, 16-18 February 1998. 1998: 23.
Johnston RL, Day AC, Donachie PHJ, Sparrow JM. The Royal College of Ophthalmologists’ National Ophthalmology Database study of cataract surgery: report 4, equity of access to cataract surgery. Eye (Lond). 2020;34:530–6.
Anon. State Planning Commission. Available at: https://www.spc.tn.gov.in/spc_reports/MDPI_FTM.pdf [Accessed May 2, 2023].
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
G-BSB was responsible for literature review, conceiving and designing the study, data acquisition, data analysis, interpretation, writing and reviewing the manuscript. AG and SC were responsible for conceiving the study, data acquisition and review the manuscript. TR and FvM were responsible for designing the study, data analysis, interpretation, and reviewing the manuscript. SG was responsible for data analysis, literature review and manuscript review. RDR was responsible for interpretation and review of manuscript. LB analysed the data and reviewed the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Subburaman, GB.B., Gunasekaran, A., Chandrashekaran, S. et al. Comparison of cataract surgery outcomes between a secondary and a tertiary eye hospital in Tamil Nadu, India. Eye 38, 335–342 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41433-023-02687-6
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41433-023-02687-6