Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Clinical nutrition

A retrospective analysis on epidemiological characteristics of home enteral nutrition: results from a Chinese tertiary hospital in 2018

Abstract

Background

The use of home enteral nutrition (HEN) has increased enormously. HEN has been shown to decrease length of stays, improve clinical outcomes, and increase quality of life. Literature on HEN epidemiology has also sprouted recently. Nevertheless, studies on Chinese HEN users are hardly seen. The objective of this study was thus to describe the epidemiological characteristics of HEN users from a Chinese tertiary hospital in 2018.

Methods

Data were retrospectively analyzed using the personal patient profiles we created upon each HEN initiation. In the year of 2018, 2007 patients and a cumulative total of 3375 episodes were recorded.

Results

The median age was 61 (IQR 46–75) years, and 63 (IQR 49–75) for males and 55 (IQR 43–72) for females. The most frequent indication for HEN implementation was oncological diseases (35.8%), followed by digestive diseases (13.4%), and neurological diseases (9.0%). Overall, 90.0% of the episodes were prescribed for oral nutrition supplement (ONS) and 9.5% for tube feeding (TF). Majority (70.8%) of the episodes comprised standard commercial formula.

Conclusions

Our study revealed some fundamental epidemiological characteristics of Chinese HEN patients. This preliminary single-center study has multiple limitations but still possesses revelatory and referential significance for other Chinese practitioners in the field of HEN. In future, multicenter studies and qualified HEN registries are widely needed in China.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Selection and exclusion process.
Fig. 2: Number of episodes in different age range.
Fig. 3: Patient origins.
Fig. 4: Number of episodes with diagnosis.
Fig. 5: Types of formula prescribed.
Fig. 6: Episodes with energy range.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bischoff SC, Austin P, Boeykens K, Chourdakis M, Cuerda C, Jonkers-Schuitema C, et al. ESPEN guideline on home enteral nutrition. Clin Nutr. 2020;39:5–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Wong A, Goh G, Banks MD, Bauer JD. A systematic review of the cost and economic outcomes of home enteral nutrition. Clin Nutr. 2018;37:429–42.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Maeda M, Fukuda H, Shimizu S, Ishizaki T. A comparative analysis of treatment costs for home-based care and hospital-based care in enteral nutrition patients: a retrospective analysis of claims data. Health Policy. 2019;123:367–72.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Klek S, Hermanowicz A, Dziwiszek G, Matysiak K, Szczepanek K, Szybinski P, et al. Home enteral nutrition reduces complications, length of stay, and health care costs: results from a multicenter study. Am J Clin Nutr. 2014;100:609–15.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Klek S, Szybinski P, Sierzega M, Szczepanek K, Sumlet M, Kupiec M, et al. Commercial enteral formulas and nutrition support teams improve the outcome of home enteral tube feeding. J Parenter Enter Nutr. 2011;35:380–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Mazur CE, Zago RCC, Schieferdecker MEM, Maluf E. Home enteral nutrition: clinical-nutritional analysis and outcomes of 10 years of public policy. Nutr Hosp. 2019;36:758–63.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Mundi MS, Pattinson A, McMahon MT, Davidson J, Hurt RT. Prevalence of home parenteral and enteral nutrition in the United States. Nutr Clin Pract. 2017;32:799–805.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Pironi L, Candusso M, Biondo A, Bosco A, Castaldi P, Contaldo F, et al. Prevalence of home artificial nutrition in Italy in 2005: a survey by the Italian Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition (SINPE). Clin Nutr. 2007;26:123–32.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Cuerda C, Planas M, Gomez Candela C, Luengo LM, group N-S. Trends in home enteral nutrition in Spain: analysis of the NADYA registry 1992-2007. Nutr Hosp. 2009;24:347–53.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Howard L, Ament M, Fleming CR, Shike M, Steiger E. Current use and clinical outcome of home parenteral and enteral nutrition therapies in the United States. Gastroenterology. 1995;109:355–65.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Hebuterne X, Bozzetti F, Moreno Villares JM, Pertkiewicz M, Shaffer J, Staun M, et al. Home enteral nutrition in adults: a European multicentre survey. Clin Nutr. 2003;22:261–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Wanden-Berghe C, Matia Martin P, Luengo Perez LM, Cuerda Compes C, Burgos Pelaez R, Alvarez Hernandez J, et al. Home enteral nutrition in Spain; NADYA registry 2011-2012. Nutr Hosp. 2014;29:1339–44.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Wanden-Berghe C, Puiggros JC, Calanas A, Cuerda C, Garcia-Luna PP, Rabassa-Soler A, et al. The Spanish Home Enteral Nutrition registry of the year 2009: from the NADYA-SENPE group. Nutr Hosp. 2010;25:959–63.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Wanden-Berghe Lozano C, Campos C, Burgos Pelaez R, Alvarez J, Frias Soriano L, Matia Martin MP, et al. Spanish home enteral nutrition registry of the year 2016 and 2017 from the NADYA-SENPE Group. Nutr Hosp. 2019;36:233–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Song G, Liu H. Effect of Hospital to Home nutrition management model on postoperative clinical outcomes of patients with laryngeal carcinoma. Oncol Lett. 2017;14:4059–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. De Luis DA, Izaola O, Cuellar LA, Terroba MC, Cabezas G, De La Fuente B. Experience over 12 years with home enteral nutrition in a healthcare area of Spain. J Hum Nutr Diet. 2013;26:39–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Villar Taibo R, Martinez Olmos MA, Bellido Guerrero D, Vidal Casariego A, Peino Garcia R, Martis Sueiro A, et al. Epidemiology of home enteral nutrition: an approximation to reality. Nutr Hosp. 2018;35:511–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. de Luis DA, Aller R, Izaola O, Terroba MC, Cabezas G, Cuellar LA. Experience of 6 years with home enteral nutrition in an area of Spain. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2006;60:553–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Cawsey SI, Soo J, Gramlich LM. Home enteral nutrition: outcomes relative to indication. Nutr Clin Pract. 2010;25:296–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. de Luis Roman D, Aller de la Puente R, de Luis Roman J, Cuellar Olmedo LA, Terroba Larumbe MC, Izaola Jauregui O. Home enteral nutrition: analysis of efficiency in a Health District. Rev Clin Esp. 2003;203:317–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Wanden-Berghe C, Alvarez Hernandez J, Burgos Pelaez R, Cuerda Compes C, Matia Martin P, Luengo Perez LM, et al. A home enteral nutrition (HEN); spanish registry of NADYA-SENPE group; for the year 2013. Nutr Hosp. 2015;31:2518–22.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Campos-Martin C, Garcia-Torres MD, Castillo-Martin C, Dominguez-Rabadan R, Rabat-Restrepo JM. Patients discharged with home enteral nutrition from a third-level hospital in 2018. Nutrients. 2019;11:1–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Puiggros C, Lecha M, Rodriguez T, Perez-Portabella C, Planas M. Karnosfsky index as a mortality predicting factor in patients on home-based enteral nutrition. Nutr Hosp.2009;24:156–60.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Kwok T, Twinn S, Yan E. The attitudes of Chinese family caregivers of older people with dementia towards life sustaining treatments. J Adv Nurs. 2007;58:256–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. King PC, Barrimore SE, Pulle RC, Bell JJ. “I Wouldn’t Ever Want It”: a qualitative evaluation of patient and caregiver perceptions toward enteral tube feeding in hip fracture inpatients. JPEN J Parenter Enter Nutr. 2019;43:526–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. The Lancet Protecting Chinese doctors. Lancet. 2020;395:90.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Fan L, Li J, Xiang M, Yuan L, Zhang Y, Feng G, et al. Attitudes of radiation oncologists to percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy in patients with head and neck cancer and eating difficulties: a survey in China. J Int Med Res. 2018;46:1709–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Klek S, Chourdakis M, Bischoff S, Dubrov S, Forbes A, Galas A, et al. Economy matters to fight against malnutrition: results from a multicenter survey. Clin Nutr. 2017;36:162–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Li X, Zhou J, Chu C, You Q, Zhong R, Rao Z, et al. Home enteral nutrition may prevent myelosuppression of patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma treated by concurrent chemoradiotherapy. Head Neck. 2019;41:3525–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Wong A, Banks MD, Bauer JD. A Survey of Home Enteral Nutrition Practices and Reimbursement in the Asia Pacific Region. Nutrients. 2018;10.

  31. Santarpia L, Pagano MC, Pasanisi F, Contaldo F. Home artificial nutrition: an update seven years after the regional regulation. Clin Nutr 2014;33:872–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Gossum AV. Home enteral nutrition. epidemiology and legislation in Europe. Nestle Nutr Workshop Ser Clin Perform Program. 2005;10:59–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wen Hu.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

You, Q., Li, X., Ma, Y. et al. A retrospective analysis on epidemiological characteristics of home enteral nutrition: results from a Chinese tertiary hospital in 2018. Eur J Clin Nutr 75, 473–479 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41430-020-00755-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41430-020-00755-8

Search

Quick links