Tetracycline (Tet)-controlled transcriptional activators allow for the inducible expression of protein-coding genes or shRNAs, and are frequently used to decipher gene function in cultured cells and in vivo [1]. The system is based on the bacterial Tet operon that mediates resistance to Tet derivatives, such as doxycycline (Dox). In the Tet-off system, fusion of a Tet repressor protein with the transcriptional activation domain of the herpes simplex virus protein VP16 results in a Tet-controlled transcriptional activator (tTA), which constitutively binds to Tet-responsive elements (TRE), but is inhibited in its transcriptional activity by Dox [1]. In contrast, in the more frequently used Tet-on system, a mutant tTA-version generates a reverse tTA (rtTA) that is only recruited to the TRE upon Dox binding and then mediates transgene expression [1]. Since the Tet-system allows transgene expression in a tissue-specific and temporal manner, it has been extensively used for regulating expression of oncogenes or silencing of tumor suppressor genes [1,2,3]. Despite its enormous success, however, we report here that, irrespective of the transgene, the Tet-system might compromise activated T-cells, thereby providing a cautionary note for its use in immunological studies.
To investigate T-cell responses, we used transgenic mice carrying an advanced Tet-on transactivator, driving expression of a miR30-based shRNA in frame with a turboGFP reporter. To reduce effects associated with random integration, the Dox-inducible shRNA-reporter transgene was delivered by a recombinase-mediated cassette exchange approach into the type-I collagen (Col1a1) locus. During an in-depth analysis of the transgenic mice, we discovered that specific splenic T-cell populations were absent not only in those mice expressing shRNAs targeting particular mRNAs, but surprisingly also in mice carrying a control shRNA for Renilla luciferase. These effects were independent of the promoter for rtTA expression, and observed in independent mouse lineages of both ROSA26 and CAG promoter-driven systems. Although total CD4+ T-cells in the spleen were only marginally reduced, antigen-experienced CD4+ T-cells, which we characterized as CD44+ and CD62Llow, were nearly absent in the GFP-positive fractions (Fig. 1). We confirmed the reduction of activated T-cells in the GFP-positive population by CD25 and CD69 staining (Fig. 1). Importantly, disappearance of antigen-experienced T-cells was not mediated by Dox itself, since Dox-treated mice lacking rtTA expression exhibited normal numbers of activated T-cells (Fig. 1). Already 6–10 days of Dox treatment were sufficient to trigger a profound reduction in CD25+/CD44+/CD4+ T-cells, which characterize effector memory or regulatory T-cells. Thus, their rapid disappearance suggests that Dox-activated rtTA/turboGFP expression induces toxicity in these cells (Fig. 1). Interestingly, the frequency of double-negative thymocytes expressing CD25 and CD44 was not altered (Suppl. Fig. S1). However, antigen-experienced GFP-positive CD8+ T-cells, characterized by CD44 expression, were reduced similarly to the CD4+ lineage (Suppl. Fig. S2).
Our findings demonstrate that, in contrast to thymocytes and naïve T-cells, antigen-experienced T-cells are depleted using the rtTA-system. Hundreds of mouse models have been generated with the rtTA-system for the expression of oncogenes or the silencing of tumor suppressor genes. In the latter condition, the blunting effects on T-cell activation might be even advantageous to identifying novel tumor suppressors. More recently, Tet-transactivators proved very useful for modulating gene activities by CRISPR/Cas9 and Cre/LoxP technologies [4, 5]. Adverse effects of the rtTA-protein might not be restricted to activated T-cells, but could also affect other cell populations [6, 7]. Importantly, a recent study provided compelling evidence that not only activated T-cells, but also B-cells are diminished in tTA-transgenic mice [8]. This study further showed an inhibition of lymphocyte depletion by Bcl-2, suggesting that tTA expression triggers an apoptotic response. Thus, in addition to the ability of Dox to interfere with mitochondrial functions [9], these results provide a cautionary note for using proper controls to reveal potential side effects of Tet transactivator expression alone.
References
Gossen M, Bujard H. Annu Rev Genet. 2002;36:153–73.
Welman A, et al. Transl Oncogenomics. 2007;2:17–33.
Premsrirut PK, et al. Cell. 2011;145:145–58.
Schonig K, et al. Nucleic Acids Res. 2002;30:e134.
Dow LE, et al. Nat Biotechnol. 2015;33:390–4.
Sisson TH, et al. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 2006;34:552–60.
Morimoto M, et al. Dev Biol. 2009;325:171–8.
Ottina E, et al. Nat Commun. 2017;8:1028.
Moullan N, et al. Cell Rep. 2015;10:1681–91
Acknowledgements
We thank A. Villunger for sharing data prior to publication and S. Autenrieth for helpful discussion. This work was supported by the Emmy–Noether Program, the CRC TR156 and TR209 of the German Research Foundation, and the Excellence Initiative of the University of Tübingen.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Electronic supplementary material
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Schmitt, A., Schulze-Osthoff, K. & Hailfinger, S. Correspondence: T cells are compromised in tetracycline transactivator transgenic mice. Cell Death Differ 25, 634–636 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41418-017-0042-y
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41418-017-0042-y