Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Fertility preservation from the point of view of hematopoietic cell transplant specialists—a worldwide-web-based survey analysis

Abstract

With the increase in cancer survival, men and women have a chance to conceive children post-recovery. This study aims to better understand hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) specialist practices and opinions related to fertility preservation for hematological malignancy patients. Survey requests were emailed to 586 European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) members. Respondents completed the mostly multiple-choice questionnaire on the IVF-Worldwide.com website. Results were reported as a percentage of respondents. Responses were submitted by 150 HCT specialists from 41 (of 195) countries worldwide. The survey showed that most HCT specialists (87%) are aware of and inform patients that chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and transplantation could harm fertility. Specialists referred 56% of their male patients to fertility preservation but only 36% of their female patients; many pre-pubertal or near post-menopausal patients were not referred. This indicates that barriers may be preventing specialists from referring patients for fertility preservation. Many HCT specialists do not know about or use international fertility preservation recommendations, indicating that new protocols for enhancing awareness are needed. Establishing a referral process protocol to reproductive specialists should be considered. When non-urgent treatment can be deferred for 10–20 days, patients can have a sufficient window to undergo certain fertility preservation procedures.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sonmezer M, Oktay K. Fertility preservation in female patients. Hum Reprod Update. 2004;10:251–66.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Stewart BW, Wild CP (eds). World Cancer Report 2014. Lyon, France: International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC); 2014.

  3. American Cancer Society. Cancer treatment & survivorship facts and figures (2016–2017). https://www.cancer.org/content/dam/cancer-org/research/cancer-facts-and-statistics/cancer-treatment-and-survivorship-facts-and-figures/cancer-treatment-and-survivorship-facts-and-figures-2016-2017.pdf. Accessed 16 April 2018.

  4. Kaspers GJ, Creutzig U. Pediatric acute myeloid leukemia: international progress and future directions. Leukemia. 2005;19:2025–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Meirow D, Nugent D. The effects of radiotherapy and chemotherapy on female reproduction. Hum Reprod Update. 2001;7:535–43.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. ISFP Practice Committee, Kim SS, Donnez J, Barri P, Pellicer A, Patrizio P, et al. Recommendations for fertility preservation in patients with lymphoma, leukemia, and breast cancer. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2012;29:465–46.

    PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Maltaris T, Seufert R, Fischl F, Schaffrath M, Pollow K, Koelbl H, et al. The effect of cancer treatment on female fertility and strategies for preserving fertility. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2007;130:148–55.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Meirow D. Ovarian injury and modern options to preserve fertility in female cancer patients treated with high dose radio-chemotherapy for hemato-oncological neoplasias and other cancers. Leuk Lymphoma. 1999;33:65–76.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Panasiuk A, Nussey S, Veys P, Amrolia P, Rao K, Krawczuk-Rybak M, et al. Gonadal function and fertility after stem cell transplantation in childhood: comparison of a reduced intensity conditioning regimen containing melphalan with a myeloablative regimen containing busulfan. Br J Haematol. 2015;170:719–26.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Chatteriee R, Goldstone AH. Gonadal damage and effects on fertility in adult patients with haematological malignancy undergoing stem cell transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplant. 1996;17:5–11.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Schover LR. Motivation for parenthood after cancer: a review. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2005;34:2–5.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Matthews ML, Hurst BS, Marshburn PB, Usadi RS, Papadakis MA, Sarantou T, et al. Cancer, fertility preservation, and future pregnancy: a comprehensive review. Obstet Gynecol Int. 2012;2012:953937.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Letourneau JM, Ebbel EE, Katz PP, Katz A, Ai WZ, Chien AJ, et al. Pretreatment fertility counseling and fertility preservation improve quality of life in reproductive age women with cancer. Cancer. 2012;118:1710–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Loren AW, Mangu PB, Beck LN, Brennan L, Magdalinski AJ, Partridge AH, et al. Fertility preservation for patients with cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology clinical practice guideline update. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31:2500–10.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Anderson RA, Wallace WHB. Pregnancy and live birth after successful cancer treatment in young women: the need to improve fertility preservation and advice for female cancer patients. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther. 2018;18:1–2.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, American Society for Reproductive Medicine, Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology. 2015 Assisted Reproductive Technology National Summary Report. Atlanta (GA): US Department of Health and Human Services; 2017.

  17. Mature oocyte cryopreservation: a guideline. Practice committees of American Society for Reproductive Medicine, Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology. Fertil Steril. 2013;99:37–43.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Balduzzi A, Dalle JH, Jahnukainen K, von Wolff M, Lucchini G, Ifversen M, et al. Fertility preservation issues in pediatric hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: practical approaches from the consensus of the Pediatric Diseases Working Party of the EBMT and the International BFM Study Group. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2017;52:1406–15.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Dalle JH, Lucchini G, Balduzzi A, Ifversen M, Jahnukainen K, Macklon KT, et al. State-of-the-art fertility preservation in children and adolescents undergoing haematopoietic stem cell transplantation: a report on the expert meeting of the Paediatric Diseases Working Party (PDWP) of the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) in Baden, Austria, 29-30 September 2015. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2017;52:1029–35.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Ussher JM, Parton C, Perz J. Need for information, honesty and respect: patient perspectives on health care professionals communication about cancer and fertility. Reprod Health. 2018;15:2.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. IVF-Worldwide. Fertility preservation survey. https://ivf-worldwide.com/survey/fertility-preservation-hemato-oncologist.html. Accessed 5 September 2018.

  22. Diesch T, Rovo A, von der Weid N, Faraci M, Pillon M, Dalissier A, et al. Fertility preservation practices in pediatric and adolescent cancer patients undergoing HSCT in Europe: a population-based survey. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2017;52:1022–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Flink DM, Sheeder J, Kondapalli LA. A review of the oncology patient’s challenges for utilizing fertility preservation services. J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol. 2017;6:31–44.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Hathaway AR, Rocque GB. Referral to infertility counseling in cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol. 2017;35:220–2.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Schover LR, Brey K, Lichtin A, Lipshultz LI, Jeha S. Oncologists’ attitudes and practices regarding banking sperm before cancer treatment. J Clin Oncol. 2002;20:1890–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Adams E, Hill E, Watson E. Fertility preservation in cancer survivors: a national survey of oncologists’ current knowledge, practice and attitudes. Br J Cancer. 2013;108:1602–15.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Melo C, Fonseca A, Silva C, Almeida-Santos T, Canavarro MC. Portuguese oncologists’ practices regarding female fertility preservation: Which barriers most relate to these practices? Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) 2018; e12812.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Shimizu C, Bando H, Kato T, Mizota Y, Yamamoto S, Fujiwara Y, et al. Physicians’ knowledge, attitude, and behavior regarding fertility issues for young breast cancer patients: a national survey for breast care specialists. Breast Cancer. 2013;20:230–40.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Sheth KR, Sharma V, Helfand BT, Cashy J, Smith K, Hedges JC, et al. Improved fertility preservation care for male patients with cancer after establishment of formalized oncofertility program. J Urol. 2012;187:979–86.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Mayor S. Just 4% of young women treated for cancer take up fertility preservation services. BMJ. 2012;344:e2336.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Fallat ME, Hutter J. Preservation of fertility in pediatric and adolescent patients with cancer. Pediatrics. 2008;121:e1461.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Jadoul P, Dolmans MM, Donnez J. Fertility preservation in girls during childhood: Is it feasible, efficient and safe and to whom should it be proposed? Hum Reprod Update. 2010;16:617–30.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Stein DM, Victorson DE, Choy JT, Waimey KE, Pearman TP, Smith K, et al. Fertility preservation preferences and perspectives among adult male survivors of pediatric cancer and their parents. J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol. 2014;3:75–82.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Rashidi BH, Tehrani ES, Ghaffari F. Ovarian stimulation for emergency fertility preservation in cancer patients: a case series study. Gynecol Oncol Rep. 2014;10:19–21.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. von Wolff M, Thaler CJ, Frambach T, Zeeb C, Lawrenz B, Popovici RM, et al. Ovarian stimulation to cryopreserve fertilized oocytes in cancer patients can be started in the luteal phase. Fertil Steril. 2009;92:1360–5.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Cakmak H, Rosen MP. Random-start ovarian stimulation in patients with cancer. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2015;27:215–21.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Keskin U, Ercan CM, Yilmaz A, Babacan A, Korkmaz C, Duru NK, et al. Random-start controlled ovarian hyperstimulation with letrozole for fertility preservation in cancer patients: case series and review of literature. J Pak Med Assoc. 2014;64:830–2.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Döhner H, Estey EH, Amadori S, Appelbaum FR, Büchner T, Burnett AK, et al. Diagnosis and management of acute myeloid leukemia in adults: recommendations from an international expert panel, on behalf of the European LeukemiaNet. Blood. 2010;115:453–74.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Sekeres MA, Elson P, Kalaycio ME, Advani AS, Copelan EA, Faderl S, et al. Time from diagnosis to treatment initiation predicts survival in younger, but not older, acute myeloid leukemia patients. Blood. 2009;113:28–36.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Lee D-Y, Kim SK, Kim M, Hwang KJ, Kim SH. Fertility preservation for patients with hematologic malignancies: The Korean Society for Fertility Preservation clinical guidelines. Clin Exp Reprod Med. 2017;44:187–92.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Dolmans MM, Marinescu C, Saussoy P, Van LA, Amorim C, Donnez J. Reimplantation of cryopreserved ovarian tissue from patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia is potentially unsafe. Blood. 2010;116:2908–14.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Rosendahl M, Greve T, Andersen CY. The safety of transplanting cryopreserved ovarian tissue in cancer patients: a review of the literature. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2012;30:11–24.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Meirow D, Hardan I, Dor J, Fridman E, Elizur S, Ra’anani H, et al. Searching for evidence of disease and malignant cell contamination in ovarian tissue stored from hematologic cancer patients. Hum Reprod. 2008;23:1007–13.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Mahajan N. Fertility preservation in female cancer patients: an overview. J Hum Reprod Sci. 2015;8:3–13.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Practice Committee of American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Fertility preservation in patients undergoing gonadotoxic therapy or gonadectomy: a committee opinion. Fertil Steril. 2013;100:1214–23.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Lambertini M, Del Mastro L, Pescio MC, Andersen CY, Azim HA Jr, Peccatori FA, et al. Cancer and fertility preservation: international recommendations from an expert meeting. BMC Med. 2016;14:1.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Rodriguez-Wallberg KA, Oktay K. Fertility preservation during cancer treatment: clinical guidelines. Cancer Manag Res. 2014;6:105–17.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Metzger ML, Meacham LR, Patterson B, Casillas JS, Constine LS, Hijiya N, et al. Female reproductive health after childhood, adolescent, and young adult cancers: guidelines for the assessment and management of female reproductive complications. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31:1239–47.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Martinez F. Update on fertility preservation from the Barcelona International Society for Fertility Preservation–ESHRE–ASRM 2015 expert meeting: indications, results and future perspectives. Fertil Steril. 2017;108:407–15.e11.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Peccatori FA, Azim HA Jr, Orecchia R, Hoekstra HJ, Pavlidis N, Kesic V, et al. Cancer, pregnancy and fertility: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol. 2013;24(Suppl 6):vi160–70.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Mintziori G, Lambrinoudaki I, Ceausu I, Depypere H, Erel CT, Pérez-López FR, et al. EMAS position statement: fertility preservation. Maturitas. 2014;77:85–89.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Von Wolff M, Montag M, Dittrich R, Denschlag D, Nawroth F, Lawrenz B. Fertility preservation in women—a practical guide to preservation techniques and therapeutic strategies in breast cancer, Hodgkin’s lymphoma and borderline ovarian tumours by the fertility preservation network FertiPROTEKT. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2011;284:427–35.

    Google Scholar 

  53. AYA cancer fertility preservation guidance working group. Fertility preservation for AYAs diagnosed with cancer: Guidance for health professionals. Sydney: Cancer Council Australia; 2017. https://wiki.cancer.org.au/australia/COSA:AYA_cancer_fertility_preservation. Accessed 5 September 2018.

  54. RCOG Scientific Paper No. 35. Fertility Sparing Treatments in Gynaecological Cancers 2013. https://www.rcog.org.uk/globalassets/documents/guidelines/scientific-impact-papers/sip_35.pdf. Accessed 1 October 2018.

  55. Dutch Society for Obstetrics and Gynecology (NVOG) and Quality Institute for Health Care CB. Guideline cryopreservation of ovarian tissue. Utrecht: The Netherlands; 2007.

  56. Almeida-Santos T, Sousa G, Teixeira A, Cardoso P, Melo C, Teixeira A, et al. Recomendações para a preservação do potencial reprodutivo no doente oncológico. Revista Portuguesa de Oncologia. 2017;2:5–24.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Ronn R, Holzer HEG. Oncofertility in Canada: an overview of Canadian practice and suggested action plan. Current Oncology. 2013;20:e465–e474.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  58. Muñoz M, Santaballa A, Seguí MA, Beato C, de la Cruz S, Espinosa J, et al. SEOM Clinical Guideline of fertility preservation and reproduction in cancer patients (2016). Clin Translat Oncol. 2016;18:1229–36.

    Google Scholar 

  59. Kim J, Kim SK, Hwang KJ, Kim SH. Fertility preservation during cancer treatment: The Korean Society for Fertility Preservation clinical guidelines. Clin Exp Reprod Med. 2017;44:171–4.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  60. Köhler TS, Kondapalli LA, Shah A, Chan S, Woodruff TK, Brannigan RE. Results from the survey for preservation of adolescent reproduction (SPARE) study: gender disparity in delivery of fertility preservation message to adolescents with cancer. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2011;28:269–77.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Peddie VL, Porter MA, Barbour R, Culligan D, MacDonald G, King D, et al. Factors affecting decision making about fertility preservation after cancer diagnosis: a qualitative study. BJOG. 2012;119:1049–57.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Friedler S, Koc O, Gidoni Y, Raziel A, Ron-El R. Ovarian response to stimulation for fertility preservation in women with malignant disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Fertil Steril. 2012;97:125–33.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Robertson AD, Missmer SA, Ginsburg ES. Embryo yield after in vitro fertilization in women undergoing embryo banking for fertility preservation before chemotherapy. Fertil Steril. 2011;95:588–91.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Sabatini ME, Wolkovich AM, Macklin EA, Wright DL, Souter I, Toth TL. Pronuclear embryo cryopreservation experience: outcomes for reducing the risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome and for fertility preservation in cancer patients. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2011;28:279–84.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Cardozo ER, Thomson AP, Karmon AE, Dickinson KA, Wright DL, Sabatini ME. Ovarian stimulation and in-vitro fertilization outcomes of cancer patients undergoing fertility preservation compared to age matched controls: a 17-year experience. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2015;32:587–96.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  66. Stoop D, Cobo A, Silber S. Fertility preservation for age-related fertility decline. Lancet. 2014;384:1311–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Funding

Technical aspects of the IVF-Worldwide survey were supported by an unrestricted grant from Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. [Grant number: TST_TPU_SRVS_2017_21763].

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zeev Shoham.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

HA has nothing to disclose. GS has nothing to disclose. RL-T was a consultant for Teva Europe Medical Affairs. AN is on the board of the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT). MM is on the board of the EBMT. RD is on the board of the EBMT. ML is an executive at IVF-Worldwide. ZS is an executive at IVF-Worldwide.

Additional information

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Alexandroni, H., Shoham, G., Levy-Toledano, R. et al. Fertility preservation from the point of view of hematopoietic cell transplant specialists—a worldwide-web-based survey analysis. Bone Marrow Transplant 54, 1747–1755 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41409-019-0519-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41409-019-0519-z

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links