Abstract
Study design
Cross-sectional study.
Objectives
Work-related disability is common in persons with spinal cord injury (SCI). The aims of this study are to examine the associations of employment with self-perceived health (SPH) and quality of life (QoL) across 22 countries and to explore the covariates around employment and SPH and QoL.
Setting
Community.
Methods
We analyzed 9494 community-dwelling persons with SCI aged 18–65. We performed an adjusted regression and path analysis. The independent variable was ‘employment’ and the dependent variables were two single items: QoL (very poor to very good) and SPH (excellent to poor). Covariates included the Gross Domestic Product (GDP), education, time since SCI, age, gender, years of employment after SCI, SCI level (paraplegia, tetraplegia), and completeness of SCI.
Results
Participants’ mean age was 47, 74% were male, and 63% had paraplegia. We found an association between employment and QoL and SPH. While the magnitude of the effect of employment on QoL did not differ across GDP quartiles, its perceived effect on QoL was found to be significant in the highest GDP quartile. Employment was predictive of good SPH in two GDP quartiles (Q1 and Q4), but significant across all quartiles when predicting poor perceptions, with the magnitude of effect varying significantly.
Conclusions
Employment is closely related to QoL and SPH depending on the GDP. We may positively influence the QoL and SPH in the SCI population to promote better employment outcomes by considering the infrastructure and economy.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$259.00 per year
only $21.58 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The datasets generated during and analyzed during the current study are not publicly available due to multinational data sharing agreement governed by institutional ethics/Institutional Review Boards and government policies on open data sharing.
References
WHO Rehabilitation Need Estimator | IHME Viz Hub. [cited 22 Aug 2022]. http://vizhub.healthdata.org/rehabilitation.
Post MW, Reinhardt JD, Avellanet M, Escorpizo R, Engkasan JP, Schwegler U, et al. Employment Among People With Spinal Cord Injury in 22 Countries Across the World: Results From the International Spinal Cord Injury Community Survey. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2020;101:2157–2166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2020.05.027.
Trenaman L, Miller WC, Querée M, Escorpizo R. SCIRE Research Team. Modifiable and non-modifiable factors associated with employment outcomes following spinal cord injury: A systematic review. J Spinal Cord Med. 2015;38:422–431. https://doi.org/10.1179/2045772315Y.0000000031.
Kent ML, Dorstyn DS. Psychological variables associated with employment following spinal cord injury: a meta-analysis. Spinal Cord. 2014;52:722–8. https://doi.org/10.1038/sc.2014.92.
Ottomanelli L, Lind L. Review of critical factors related to employment after spinal cord injury: implications for research and vocational services. J Spinal Cord Med. 2009;32:503–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/10790268.2009.11754553.
Baldassin V, Shimizu HE, Fachin-Martins E. Computer assistive technology and associations with quality of life for individuals with spinal cord injury: a systematic review. Qual Life Res Int J Qual Life Asp Treat Care Rehabil. 2018;27:597–607. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-018-1804-9.
Xu M, Li H, Zhao Z, Yang Y, Sun Z, Han H, et al. Environmental barriers, functioning and quality of life in 2008 Wenchuan earthquake victims with spinal cord injury eight years after the disaster: A cross-sectional study. J Rehabil Med. 2018;50:866–71. https://doi.org/10.2340/16501977-2380.
Connell J, O’Cathain A, Brazier J. Measuring quality of life in mental health: are we asking the right questions?. Soc Sci Med 1982. 2014;120:12–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.08.026.
Pacheco Barzallo D, Gross-Hemmi M, Bickenbach J, Juocevičius A, Popa D, Wahyuni LK, et al. Quality of Life and the Health System: A 22-Country Comparison of the Situation of People With Spinal Cord Injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2020;101:2167–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2020.04.030.
Tasiemski T, Kujawa J, Tederko P, Rubinelli S, Middleton JW, Craig A, et al. Comparison of Life Satisfaction in Persons With Spinal Cord Injury Living in 22 Countries With Different Economic Status. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2022;103:1285–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2021.11.008.
Giannico V, Spano G, Elia M, D’Este M, Sanesi G, Lafortezza R. Green spaces, quality of life, and citizen perception in European cities. Environ Res. 2021;196:110922. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2021.110922.
Kobelt G, Berg J, Lindgren P, Fredrikson S, Jönsson B. Costs and quality of life of patients with multiple sclerosis in Europe. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2006;77:918–26. https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp.2006.090365.
Stucki G, Bickenbach J. The Implementation Challenge and the Learning Health System for SCI Initiative. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2017;96:S55–S60. https://doi.org/10.1097/PHM.0000000000000672.
Fekete C, Brach M, Ehrmann C, Post MWM, Stucki G. Cohort profile of the International Spinal Cord Injury (InSCI) Community Survey implemented in 22 countries. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2020; S0003999320303671. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2020.01.022
Gross-Hemmi MH, Post MWM, Ehrmann C, Fekete C, Hasnan N, Middleton JW, et al. Study Protocol of the International Spinal Cord Injury (InSCI) Community Survey. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2017;96:S23–S34. https://doi.org/10.1097/PHM.0000000000000647.
World Health Organization. International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. Geneva: WHO; 2001.
Fekete C, Post MWM, Bickenbach J, Middleton J, Prodinger B, Selb M, et al. A Structured Approach to Capture the Lived Experience of Spinal Cord Injury: Data Model and Questionnaire of the International Spinal Cord Injury Community Survey. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2017;96:S5–S16. https://doi.org/10.1097/PHM.0000000000000622.
Skevington SM, Lotfy M, O’Connell KA. WHOQOL Group. The World Health Organization’s WHOQOL-BREF quality of life assessment: psychometric properties and results of the international field trial. A report from the WHOQOL group. Qual Life Res Int J Qual Life Asp Treat Care Rehabil. 2004;13:299–310. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:QURE.0000018486.91360.00.
Barker RN, Kendall MD, Amsters DI, Pershouse KJ, Haines TP, Kuipers P. The relationship between quality of life and disability across the lifespan for people with spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord. 2009;47:149–55. https://doi.org/10.1038/sc.2008.82.
Fekete C, Siegrist J, Post MWM, Brinkhof MWG. SwiSCI Study Group. Productive activities, mental health and quality of life in disability: exploring the role enhancement and the role strain hypotheses. BMC Psychol. 2019;7:1. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-018-0276-6.
Ware JE, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care. 1992;30:473–83.
Whitehurst DGT, Noonan VK, Dvorak MFS, Bryan S. A review of preference-based health-related quality of life questionnaires in spinal cord injury research. Spinal Cord. 2012;50:646–54. https://doi.org/10.1038/sc.2012.46.
Marti A, Boes S, Lay V, Escorpizo R, Reuben Escorpizo PT, Trezzini B. The association between chronological age, age at injury and employment: Is there a mediating effect of secondary health conditions?. Spinal Cord. 2016;54:239–44. https://doi.org/10.1038/sc.2015.159.
https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/ny.gdp.mktp.pp.cd GDP, PPP (current international $) | Data. [cited 23 Aug 2022].
Muthén LK, Muthén BO. Mplus User’s Guide. 6th ed. Los Angeles CA: Muthén & Muthén; 2007.
Clogg CC, Petkova E, Haritou A. Statistical Methods for Comparing Regression Coefficients Between Models. Am J Socio. 1995;100:1261–93. https://doi.org/10.1086/230638.
Paternoster R, Brame R, Mazerolle P, Piquero A. Using the correct statistical test for the equality of regression coefficients. Criminology. 1998;36:859–66. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.1998.tb01268.x.
Dijkers MPJM. Quality of life of individuals with spinal cord injury: a review of conceptualization, measurement, and research findings. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2005;42:87–110. https://doi.org/10.1682/jrrd.2004.08.0100.
Post MWM, van Leeuwen CMC. Psychosocial issues in spinal cord injury: a review. Spinal Cord. 2012;50:382–89. https://doi.org/10.1038/sc.2011.182.
Borg SJ, Geraghty T, Arora M, Foster M, Marshall R, Nunn A, et al. Employment outcomes following spinal cord injury: a population-based cross-sectional study in Australia. Spinal Cord. 2021;59:1120–31. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41393-021-00639-z.
Borg SJ, Borg DN, Arora M, Middleton JW, Marshall R, Nunn A, et al. Factors Related to Engagement in Employment After Spinal Cord Injury in Australia: A Cross-sectional Study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2022;S0003-9993:00401–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2022.04.011.
http://data.oecd.org/gdp/gross-domestic-product-gdp.htm GDP and spending - Gross domestic product (GDP) - OECD Data. In: theOECD. [cited 22 Aug 2022].
Rana RH, Alam K, Gow J. Health expenditure and gross domestic product: causality analysis by income level. Int J Health Econ Manag. 2020;20:55–77. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10754-019-09270-1.
Wehrmeister FC, da Silva ICM, Barros AJD, Victora CG. Is governance, gross domestic product, inequality, population size or country surface area associated with coverage and equity of health interventions? Ecological analyses of cross-sectional surveys from 80 countries. BMJ Glob Health. 2017;2:e000437. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2017-000437.
Bradley EH, Elkins BR, Herrin J, Elbel B. Health and social services expenditures: associations with health outcomes. BMJ Qual Saf. 2011;20:826–31. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs.2010.048363.
Mann R, Schaefer C, Sadosky A, Bergstrom F, Baik R, Parsons B, et al. Burden of spinal cord injury-related neuropathic pain in the United States: retrospective chart review and cross-sectional survey. Spinal Cord. 2013;51:564–70. https://doi.org/10.1038/sc.2013.34.
Zemedikun DT, Kigozi J, Wynne-Jones G, Guariglia A, Roberts T. Methodological considerations in the assessment of direct and indirect costs of back pain: A systematic scoping review. PloS One. 2021;16:e0251406. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0251406.
Davalos ME, French MT. This recession is wearing me out! Health-related quality of life and economic downturns. J Ment Health Policy Econ. 2011;14:61–72.
Sturm C, Bökel A, Korallus C, Geng V, Kalke YB, Abel R, et al. Promoting factors and barriers to participation in working life for people with spinal cord injury. J Occup Med Toxicol. 2020;15:37. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12995-020-00288-7.
Middleton JW, Arora M, Kifley A, Clark J, Borg SJ, Tran Y, et al. Australian arm of the International Spinal Cord Injury (Aus-InSCI) Community Survey: 2. Understanding the lived experience in people with spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord. 2022;60:1069–79. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41393-022-00817-7.
Fekete C, Reinhardt JD, Arora M, Patrick Engkasan J, Gross-Hemmi M, Kyriakides A, et al. Socioeconomic status and social relationships in persons with spinal cord injury from 22 countries: Does the countries’ socioeconomic development moderate associations? Inbaraj LR, editor. PLOS ONE. 2021;16:e0255448. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0255448.
Acknowledgements
This study is based on data from the International Spinal Cord Injury (InSCI) Community Survey, providing the evidence for the Learning Health System for Spinal Cord Injury (LHS-SCI, see Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2017;96(Suppl):S23–S34). The LHS-SCI is an effort to implement the recommendations described in the WHO report International Perspectives on Spinal Cord Injury (Bickenbach J et al. Geneva: WHO Press; 2013). The members of the InSCI Steering Committee are: James Middleton, Julia Patrick Engkasan, Gerold Stucki, Mirjam Brach, Jerome Bickenbach, Mirja Gross-Hemmi, Christine Thyrian, Linamara Battistella, Jianan Li, Brigitte Perrouin-Verbe, Christoph Gutenbrunner, Christina-Anastasia Rapidi, Luh Karunia Wahyuni, Mauro Zampolini, Eiichi Saitoh, Bum-Suk Lee, Alvydas Juocevicius, Nazirah Hasnan, Abderrazak Hajjioui, Marcel W.M. Post, Anne Catrine Martinsen, Piotr Tederko, Daiana Popa, Conran Joseph, Mercè Avellanet, Michael Baumberger, Apichana Kovindha, and Reuben Escorpizo. Funding: No financial assistance was received in support of the study.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
RE was responsible for conceptualizing the project, writing the protocol and report, interpreting results, and revision and reviewing of the manuscript prior to submission. SN was responsible for writing the protocol, analyzing data, interpreting results, writing, revision and reviewing of the manuscript prior to submission. MWMP participated in the conceptualization and writing of the protocol, interpreting results, writing, revision, and reviewing of the manuscript prior to submission. US participated in the conceptualization and writing of the protocol, interpreting results, writing, revision, and reviewing of the manuscript prior to submission. JE participated in the conceptualization and writing of the protocol, interpreting results, writing, revision, and reviewing of the manuscript prior to submission. AH participated in the conceptualization and writing of the protocol, interpreting results, writing, revision, and reviewing of the manuscript prior to submission. TG participated in the conceptualization and writing of the protocol, interpreting results, writing, revision, and reviewing of the manuscript prior to submission. CS participated in the conceptualization and writing of the protocol, interpreting results, writing, revision, and reviewing of the manuscript prior to submission.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Ethical approval
Each participating country received approval from its respective Institutional Review Boards or Ethical Committees. The study complied with the Declaration of Helsinki. All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were approved by the ethical committees of each country. Consent to participate was administered to participants before their participation.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Escorpizo, R., Naud, S., Post, M.W.M. et al. Relationship between employment and quality of life and self-perceived health in people with spinal cord injury: an international comparative study based on the InSCI Community Survey. Spinal Cord 62, 110–116 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41393-023-00953-8
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41393-023-00953-8