Abstract
Study design
Natural experiment
Objectives
To determine whether COVID-19 restrictions were associated with changes in the incidence of traumatic spinal cord injury (TSCI) in Scotland.
Setting
The Queen Elizabeth National Spinal Injuries Unit (QENSIU), the sole provider of treatment for TSCI in Scotland.
Methods
Time series analysis of all admissions for TSCI between 1st January 2015 and 31st August 2022.
Results
Over the 8-year study period, 745 patients were admitted to the QENSIU with a TSCI. Interrupted time series analysis showed that level 3 and 4 COVID-19 lockdown restrictions (the most severe levels) were associated with lower incidence of TSCI (RR 0.63, CI% CI 0.47, 0.82, p < 0.001). The associations were stronger in people aged over 45 (additive interaction p = 0.001), males (additive interaction p = 0.01) and non-tetraplegia (additive interaction p = 0.002). The incidence of TSCI due to deliberate self-harm was higher (0.41 versus 0.23 per month) during restrictions.
Conclusions
Overall, TSCI incidence reduced in Scotland when lockdowns were implemented, presumably due to lower engagement in risky activities. The increase in TSCI due to deliberate self-harm may reflect increased mental health problems and social isolation and should be anticipated and targeted in future pandemics. The change in incidence during the COVID-19 pandemic may have an economic impact and see a temporary reduction in the burden on health and social care. The results of this study will be useful for resource planning in future pandemics.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
A spinal cord injury (SCI) is a devastating event, with a global incidence rate of over 200,000 cases per year [1]. These injuries have a massive impact on both the person with the SCI and their families, with an estimated lifetime cost of care of £1.12 million in the United Kingdom [2]. Increasing our understanding of the epidemiology of SCI enables the development and targeting of prevention strategies, accurate evaluation of novel treatments and planning of immediate and long-term care provision [3].
There is a rapidly growing interest in the epidemiology of SCI, and the temporal trends associated with this, with five papers published in ‘Spinal Cord’ on this topic alone between January 2020 and August 2021 [4,5,6,7,8]. The COVID-19 pandemic, and associated lockdowns, impacted hospital admission patterns for a wide range of common conditions [9]. A change in the incidence of SCI caused by COVID-19 is likely to have broad and long-term implications; including economic impact and burden on health and social care.
Since 1994, all new traumatic spinal cord injuries (TSCIs) in Scotland have been treated solely at the Queen Elizabeth National Spinal Injuries Unit (QENSIU), Glasgow. A clinical database has been in operation since this time, collecting clinical and demographic data about every new admission. As this encompasses every new TSCI in Scotland, data from the QENSIU can be used to reliably assess changing trends in TSCI epidemiology at a population level [10]. Notably, despite the stresses placed on the healthcare system by the COVID-19 pandemic, there was no impact on the ability of the QENSIU to admit all patients with a TSCI during this period. We hypothesise that COVID-19 lockdowns, and the associated limitations on road traffic and outdoor/sporting activities, would be associated with reduced levels of TSCI. The aim of this study was to evaluate changes in the incidence of TSCI in Scotland during the COVID-19 pandemic to inform healthcare planning and improve the management of future pandemics.
Methods
Study setting
The QENSIU is Scotland’s sole centre for treating TSCI. Information about the Unit’s creation and funding has been previously described [10]. In 2019, the last full calendar year prior to COVID-19 reaching the UK, 41% of patients were admitted to the QENSIU within 48 h of injury, with 66% of all patients admitted within one week [11]. It is assumed all TSCIs that occur in Scotland will eventually be admitted to the QENSIU. Details of the aetiology, gender, age injury level and severity of all new admissions are entered into the QENSIU database. The database does not include information about people who die due to TSCI prior to admission.
Approval for the collection and evaluation of data within the database was granted by the Data Custodian for the Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, Glasgow, Scotland.
Participants
All patients admitted to the QENSIU during the study period (1st January 2015 to 31st August 2022) were ascertained from the clinical database. The neurological level of injury and degree of impairment after TSCI was assessed by a Consultant in Spinal Injuries on admission and defined according to the International Neurological Classification of Spinal Injury using the American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale (AIS) [12]. Patients who were neurologically intact, and who were recorded as an AIS E on admission, were excluded along with those under 16 years of age. TSCI aetiology was classified in accordance with the International SCI core data set as assault, fall, transport, sports and leisure (including cycling for consistency with previous work [10] and falls that occurred during sporting activities, such as rock and mountain climbing) and other traumatic (deliberate self-harm (DSH), iatrogenic [13], and industrial) [14].
Analyses
All data were analysed according to the level of restrictions placed on the public at that point in time. Scotland saw four different levels of lockdown applied during the COVID-19 pandemic, with Level 1 being the least severe and Level 4 being the most severe (equivalent to a full population-level lockdown) [15]. These levels are summarised in Fig. 1. January 2015 to 31st March 2020 inclusive were denoted as the pre COVID-19 period, while September 2021 to August 2022 was classified as the post COVID-19 period. Incidence per million was calculated by comparing the incidence of TSCI in a calendar year with the corresponding years midyear population estimate [16]. As data was not yet available for 2022, the 2021 midyear population estimate was also used for 2022.
Poisson regression models were used to examine the number of monthly TSCIs, adjusted for age, sex, year, season, tetraplegia, and injury completeness. The level of Covid-19 was the primary exposure variable. There is no evidence of over-dispersion. The model residual deviance/degrees of freedom was 1226.4/1462 = 0.84. This indicates mild under-inflation which could lead to slightly conservative standard error estimates. Year and month were initially modelled as penalised cubic splines in the generalised additive model framework as a preliminary analysis. The model revealed linear association for a year and non-linear association for a month (Supplementary Figure. 1). The Month variable was categorised into seasons (December-February; March-May; June-August; September-November) based on the inflection points in the spline. The exposure variable was collapsed into a binary variable: No restriction to level 2; level 3 and 4 restrictions. Additive interactions between Covid-19 restrictions and: age (<45 vs. >=45), sex (female vs. male), tetraplegia, and complete injury were examined using relative excess risk due to interaction (RERI). Under this model, we estimated the counterfactual number of SCI cases as if level 3 and 4 restrictions did not occur. These, compared with the observed SCI cases, were used to estimate the number of reduced SCI cases due to COVID-19. Incidence was also analysed with a supplementary exposure variable of COVID-19 Stringency Index [17]. This score is a measure of lockdown level summated over 9 domains - school closures; workplace closures; cancellation of public events; restrictions on public gatherings; closures of public transport; stay-at-home requirements; public information campaigns; restrictions on internal movements; and international travel controls. The index is calculated as the mean score of the nine metrics, each taking a value of between 0 and 100. A higher score indicates a stricter response (i.e. 100 = strictest response). If policies vary at the subnational level, the index is shown as the response level of the strictest sub-region. The incidence of deliberate self-harm was described in different periods since there was not sufficient power to conduct a formal analysis. R Statistical Software (version 4.2.2) was used with packages mgcv and interactionR. Descriptive data are presented as means plus standard deviations or 95% confidence intervals [14, 18]. Incidence rate ratio (IRR) and 95% CI were used to infer associations and their corresponding precision.
Results
Overall impact of COVID-19
There were 510 patients admitted to the QENSIU with a TSCI over the 73 months Pre-COVID-19, compared to 121 during the 16-month COVID-19 period and 114 in the 12 months post COVID-19. This corresponds to an annual incidence of 18.0 per million population over the entire study period [16]. The characteristics of people admitted to the QENSIU with TSCI during the study is shown in Table 1.
Effects of lockdown measures
A time series plot on the monthly number of TSCI is shown in Fig. 1. Preliminary analysis found no association between level 1 and 2 restrictions and no restriction periods (Supplementary Table 1). Level 3 and 4 restrictions were associated with a lower incidence of TSCI (RR 0.63, CI% CI 0.47, 0.82, p < 0.001) (Table 2). The effect of level 3 and 4 restrictions was stronger in people aged over 45 (additive interaction p = 0.001) and slightly stronger in tetraplegia (additive interaction p = 0.002). There is a strong sex difference in the effect of level 3 and 4 restrictions to TSCI (additive interaction p = 0.01), where the reduction in TSCI incidence is also observed in males.
When comparing with the COVID-19 Stringency Index [17], an alternative method of quantifying lockdown, there was no apparent association between this Index and incidence (IRR per 1 unit of Stringency Index: 0.997, 95% CI: 0.995–1.00, p = 0.066).
Level 3 and 4 restrictions were associated with 37 (95% CI 18-62) fewer SCI cases (Table 3). Among these, most were aged >=45 years; male, paraplegic and had incomplete injuries.
Deliberate self harm
During the 5 years Pre-COVID period there were 14 cases of TSCI caused by deliberate self-harm (DSH) in Scotland. There were no TSCIs caused by DSH observed in the first year of COVID. However, in the 3 month period from April-August 2021, representing months 13 to 17 of COVID associated lockdowns, there were seven TSCIs caused by DSH. This corresponds to an incidence rate of 0.41 (95% CI 0.23–0.73) per month during the COVID period, compared to 0.23 (95% CI 0.14–0.36) per month pre COVID. Defying the norms of other causes of TSCI, five of these seven cases were in females (71%), the mean age was 31.2 (10.0) years, only one (14%) resulted in a cervical injury and only two (28%) in a complete injury (1 AIS A, 1B, 2C, 3D).
Discussion
The findings of this study indicated that the implementation of lockdown measures during the COVID-19 pandemic was associated with a significant reduction in the overall incidence of TSCI. The highest levels of lockdown led to specific reductions in TSCI incidence in males and people older than 45 years of age, with these severe lockdowns also leading to reduced rates of tetraplegia. Of concern, the lockdowns were associated with an increase in TSCI caused by deliberate self-harm, particularly among young women. We postulate that lockdowns restricted activities commonly associated with TSCI, such as road traffic accidents and sporting activities, leading to an overall reduction, but increased mental health problems and social isolation leading to an increase in self-harm. The findings suggested that the benefits and risks to overall TSCI and TSCI due to self-harm respectively were associated with the imposition of any degree of lockdown being imposed. We found no evidence that the stringency of the restrictions (as proxied using the Stringency Index) was related to TSCI incidence. This could possibly be due to the null association between mild restrictions (Levels 1–2).
Our previous research demonstrated that in the twenty-year period from 1994–2014 there was a significant change in the demographics of new TSCIs in Scotland [10]. Specifically, the mean age at injury increased by almost 10 years, there was a significant increase in the number of TSCIs being caused by falls, and there was also a significant increase in incomplete injuries and injuries resulting in tetraplegia. Most of these changes can be explained by considering an ageing population, with associated increased risks of low impact falls, improved driving and workplace safety and a reduction in violent crime. However, the results of this study show that global pandemics are also likely to have a major, if all be it temporary, impact on the demographics of TSCI and that the response to such a pandemic–restrictions, changes to laws etc., can make a direct contribution to this change.
Previous studies have shown that COVID-19 was associated with worse mental health in students, healthcare workers and the general population [19,20,21]. The COVID-19 pandemic also saw increased rates of suicide attempts [22]. The increase in the incidence of deliberate self-harm seen here is likely to be related to this change in mental health and associated suicide attempts and identifies an area which may need further support in future pandemics. For example, mental health support service could proactively identify and intervene higher risk patients in the primary care system.
Strengths
This was an unselected cohort of TSCI across the whole of the Scottish population. Access to more than five years of data prior to COVID-19 restrictions provided information on the underlying numbers and time trends. We were able to adjust for a range of potential confounders. The interrupted time series models that we used provided a robust analysis of the population-level data, robust against time-invariant confounders. We were also able to examine the moderation of TSCI characteristics on the associations between Covid-19 restrictions and TSCI risk. We excluded non-traumatic SCI which might be impacted differently by COVID-19 restrictions as lockdown measures are unlikely to have impacted the natural time course of these nontraumatic conditions.
Limitations
People with a TSCI who died before being admitted to the QENSIU were not included in this study. Therefore, the incidence rates reported here may be an underestimate due to failure to capture peri-accident mortality. However, it is unlikely that the percentage of people dying from TSCI prehospital admission differed in both periods. As with all natural experiments, it is possible that other unknown or unmeasured interventions may have occurred at the same time as the intervention of interest; namely, COVID-19 lockdowns. Finally, due to the relatively low incidence of TSCI it was not practical to stratify by age, sex, injury level or completeness of injury. Larger international collaborations and/or meta-analyses should be conducted to allow sub-group analyses, which would add significant value to the literature.
Conclusion
Lockdowns associated with the COVID-19 pandemic saw a significant reduction in the overall incidence of TSCI in Scotland. The highest levels of lockdown saw a reduction in TSCI in males and those over 45 years of age, and a reduced incidence of tetraplegia. Concerningly, there was an increase in the incidence of TSCI caused by deliberate self-harm. These changes will have long-term implications for the delivery of health and social care and should inform the management of future pandemics.
Data availability
Deidentified data used to generate the results of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
References
Lee B, Cripps RA, Fitzharris M, Wing P. The global map for traumatic spinal cord injury epidemiology: update 2011, global incidence rate. Spinal Cord. 2014;52:110–6.
McDaid D, Park AL, Gall A, Purcell M, Bacon M. Understanding and modelling the economic impact of spinal cord injuries in the United Kingdom. Spinal Cord. 2019;57:778–88.
Singh A, Tetreault L, Kalsi-Ryan S, Nouri A, Fehlings MG. Global prevalence and incidence of traumatic spinal cord injury. Clin Epidemiol. 2014;6:309–31.
Du J, Hao D, He B, Yan L, Tang Q, Zhang Z, et al. Epidemiological characteristics of traumatic spinal cord injury in Xi’an, China. Spinal Cord. 2021;59:804–13.
Franceschini M, Bonavita J, Cecconi L, Ferro S, Pagliacci MC, Italian SCISG. Traumatic spinal cord injury in Italy 20 years later: current epidemiological trend and early predictors of rehabilitation outcome. Spinal Cord. 2020;58:768–77.
Johansson E, Luoto TM, Vainionpaa A, Kauppila AM, Kallinen M, Vaarala E, et al. Epidemiology of traumatic spinal cord injury in Finland. Spinal Cord. 2021;59:761–8.
Lee BS, Kim O, Ham D. Epidemiological changes in traumatic spinal cord injuries for the last 30 years (1990-2019) in South Korea. Spinal Cord. 2021;60:612–7.
Liu H, Liu J, Shen M, Yang X, Du L, Yang M, et al. The changing demographics of traumatic spinal cord injury in Beijing, China: a single-centre report of 2448 cases over 7 years. Spinal Cord. 2021;59:298–305.
Oseran AS, Nash D, Kim C, Moisuk S, Lai PY, Pyhtila J, et al. Changes in hospital admissions for urgent conditions during COVID-19 pandemic. Am J Manag Care. 2020;26:327–8.
McCaughey EJ, Purcell M, McLean AN, Fraser MH, Bewick A, Borotkanics RJ, et al. Changing demographics of spinal cord injury over a 20-year period: a longitudinal population-based study in Scotland. Spinal Cord. 2016;54:270–6.
Queen Elizabeth National Spinal Injuries Unit. Annual Report 2019/20. Glasgow, UK (2020).
Kirshblum SC, Burns SP, Biering-Sorensen F, Donovan W, Graves DE, Jha A, et al. International standards for neurological classification of spinal cord injury (revised 2011). J Spinal Cord Med. 2011;34:535–46.
ICECI Coordination and Maintenance Group. International classification of external causes of injuries (ICECI) version 1.2. Adelaide: Consumer safety institute and AIHW National Injury Surveillance Unit; (2004).
Biering-Sorensen F, DeVivo MJ, Charlifue S, Chen Y, New PW, Noonan V, et al. International Spinal Cord Injury Core Data Set (version 2.0)-including standardization of reporting. Spinal Cord. 2017;55:759–64.
Scottish Government. COVID-19 in Scotland https://data.gov.scot/coronavirus-covid-19/2022 [Accessed 11th April 2023]
National Records of Scotland. Mid-2021 Population Estimates, Scotland. Edinburgh, UK; 2022 13th July 2022.
Mathieu E, Ritchie H, Rodés-Guirao L, Appel C, Giattino C, Hasell J, et al. “Coronavirus Pandemic (COVID-19)”. Published online at OurWorldInData.org. Retrieved from: https://ourworldindata.org/coronavirus [Online Resource]. (2020).
DeVivo MJ, Biering-Sorensen F, New P, Chen Y. International Spinal Cord Injury Data Set. Standardization of data analysis and reporting of results from the International Spinal Cord Injury Core Data Set. Spinal Cord. 2011;49:596–9.
Pieh C, Budimir S, Delgadillo J, Barkham M, Fontaine JRJ, Probst T. Mental Health During COVID-19 Lockdown in the United Kingdom. Psychosom Med. 2021;83:328–37.
Catling JC, Bayley A, Begum Z, Wardzinski C, Wood A. Effects of the COVID-19 lockdown on mental health in a UK student sample. BMC Psychol. 2022;10:118.
De Kock JH, Latham HA, Leslie SJ, Grindle M, Munoz SA, Ellis L, et al. A rapid review of the impact of COVID-19 on the mental health of healthcare workers: implications for supporting psychological well-being. BMC Public Health. 2021;21:104.
Pathirathna ML, Nandasena H, Atapattu A, Weerasekara I. Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on suicidal attempts and death rates: a systematic review. BMC Psychiatry. 2022;22:506.
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank the numerous administrative staff who have successfully maintained the QENSIU database since its conception in 1994.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Study conception: EJM, MP. Data analysis: EJM, FH, DFM, JPP, PH. Manuscript draft: EJM. Manuscript review: All authors. Approval of final manuscript: All authors.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare nocompeting interests.
Ethical approval
Approval for the collection and evaluation of data within the database was granted by the Data Custodian of the Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, Glasgow, Scotland.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
McCaughey, E.J., Ho, F.K., Mackay, D.F. et al. The impact of COVID-19 and associated lockdowns on traumatic spinal cord injury incidence: a population based study. Spinal Cord 62, 1–5 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41393-023-00939-6
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41393-023-00939-6