Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Targeting the α4–α5 dimerization interface of K-RAS inhibits tumor formation in vivo

A Correction to this article was published on 01 February 2019

This article has been updated

Abstract

RAS genes are the most commonly mutated oncogenes in human cancers. Despite tremendous efforts over the past several decades, however, RAS-specific inhibitors remain elusive. Thus, targeting RAS remains a highly sought-after goal of cancer research. Previously, we have reported a new approach to inhibit RAS-dependent signaling and transformation in vitro by targeting the α4–α5 dimerization interface with a novel RAS-specific monobody termed NS1. Expression of NS1 inhibits oncogenic K-RAS and H-RAS signaling and transformation in vitro. Here, we evaluated the efficacy of targeting RAS dimerization as an approach to inhibit tumor formation in vivo. Using a doxycycline (DOX)-regulated NS1 expression system, we demonstrate that DOX-induced NS1 inhibited oncogenic K-RAS-driven tumor growth in vivo. Furthermore, we observed context-specific effects of NS1 on RAS-mediated signaling in 2D vs 3D growth conditions. Finally, our results highlight the potential therapeutic efficacy of targeting the α4–α5 dimerization interface as an approach to inhibit RAS-driven tumors in vivo.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Change history

  • 01 February 2019

    Additionally, a further error has been corrected on page five in the sentence: Subsequent improvements to the chemistry of these lead compounds have resulted in the most recent interaction, with ARS-1620, which demonstrates selective inhibition of K-RAS(G12C) mutant tumor models in vivo [23]. The word ‘with’ has been removed from this sentence to ensure the correct meaning is communicated, such that the sentence now is: Subsequent improvements to the chemistry of these lead compounds have resulted in the most recent interaction, ARS-1620, which demonstrates selective inhibition of K-RAS(G12C) mutant tumor models in vivo [23].

References

  1. Spencer-Smith R, O’Bryan JP. Direct inhibition of RAS: Quest for the Holy Grail? Semin Cancer Biol. 2017 pii: S1044-579X(17)30221–3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.semcancer.2017.12.005.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Karnoub AE, Weinberg RA. Ras oncogenes: split personalities. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2008;9:517–31.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Cox AD, Der CJ. Ras history: The saga continues. Small GTPases. 2010;1:2–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Vigil D, Cherfils J, Rossman KL, Der CJ. Ras superfamily GEFs and GAPs: validated and tractable targets for cancer therapy? Nat Rev Cancer. 2010;10:842–57.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Cherfils J, Zeghouf M. Regulation of small GTPases by GEFs, GAPs, and GDIs. Physiol Rev. 2013;93:269–309.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Simanshu DK, Nissley DV, McCormick F. RAS proteins and their regulators in human disease. Cell. 2017;170:17–33.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Cox AD, Fesik SW, Kimmelman AC, Luo J, Der CJ. Drugging the undruggable RAS: Mission possible? Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2014;13:828–51.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Lerner EC, Qian Y, Hamilton AD, Sebti SM. Disruption of oncogenic K-Ras4B processing and signaling by a potent geranylgeranyltransferase I inhibitor. J Biol Chem. 1995;270:26770–3.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Whyte DB, Kirschmeier P, Hockenberry TN, Nunez-Oliva I, James L, Catino JJ, et al. K- and N-Ras are geranylgeranylated in cells treated with farnesyl protein transferase inhibitors. J Biol Chem. 1997;272:14459–64.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Güldenhaupt J, Rudack T, Bachler P, Mann D, Triola G, Waldmann H, et al. N-Ras forms dimers at POPC membranes. Biophys J. 2012;103:1585–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Lin W-C, Iversen L, Tu H-L, Rhodes C, Christensen SM, Iwig JS, et al. H-Ras forms dimers on membrane surfaces via a protein–protein interface. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2014;111:2996–3001.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Nan X, Tamgüney TM, Collisson EA, Lin L-J, Pitt C, Galeas J, et al. Ras-GTP dimers activate the Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase (MAPK) pathway. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2015;112:7996–8001.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Plowman SJ, Muncke C, Parton RG, Hancock JF. H-ras, K-ras, and inner plasma membrane raft proteins operate in nanoclusters with differential dependence on the actin cytoskeleton. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2005;102:15500–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Kovrigina EA, Galiakhmetov AR, Kovrigin EL. The Ras G domain lacks the intrinsic propensity to form dimers. Biophys J. 2015;109:1000–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Chung JK, Lee YK, Denson J-P, Gillette WK, Alvarez S, Stephen AG, et al. K-Ras4B remains monomeric on membranes over a wide range of surface densities and lipid compositions. Biophys J. 2018;114:137–45.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Santos E. Dimerization opens new avenues into ras signaling research. Sci Signal. 2014;7:pe12–pe12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Spencer-Smith R, Koide A, Zhou Y, Eguchi RR, Sha F, Gajwani P, et al. Inhibition of RAS function through targeting an allosteric regulatory site. Nat Chem Biol. 2017;13:62–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Spencer-Smith R, Li L, Prasad S, Koide A, Koide S, O’Bryan JP. Targeting the α4–α5 interface of RAS results in multiple levels of inhibition. Small GTPases. 2017;1–10.

  19. Kim J-S, Lee C, Foxworth A, Waldman T. B-Raf is dispensable for K-Ras-mediated oncogenesis in human cancer cells. Cancer Res. 2004;64:1932–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Vartanian S, Bentley C, Brauer MJ, Li L, Shirasawa S, Sasazuki T, et al. Identification of mutant K-Ras-dependent phenotypes using a panel of isogenic cell lines. J Biol Chem. 2013;288:2403–13.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Porter AG, Jänicke RU. Emerging roles of caspase-3 in apoptosis. Cell Death Differ. 1999;6:99–104.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Ostrem JM, Peters U, Sos ML, Wells JA, Shokat KM. K-Ras(G12C) inhibitors allosterically control GTP affinity and effector interactions. Nature. 2013;503:548–51.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Janes MR, Zhang J, Li L-S, Hansen R, Peters U, Guo X, et al. Targeting KRAS mutant cancers with a covalent G12C-specific inhibitor. Cell. 2018;172:578–89.e17.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Muzumdar MD, Chen P-Y, Dorans KJ, Chung KM, Bhutkar A, Hong E, et al. Survival of pancreatic cancer cells lacking KRAS function. Nat Commun. 2017;8:1090.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Ambrogio C, Köhler J, Zhou Z-W, Wang H, Paranal R, Li J, et al. KRAS dimerization impacts MEK inhibitor sensitivity and oncogenic activity of mutant KRAS. Cell. 2018;172:857–68.e15.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Clark GJ, Cox AD, Graham SM, Der CJ. Biological assays for Ras transformation. Methods Enzymol. 1995;255:395–412.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank Drs. Andrei Karginov, Todd Waldman, Gregory Thatcher, Bernard Weisman, and Robert Winn for providing various cell lines. In addition, we wish to thank Drs. Shohei Koide and Andrei Karginov along with the O’Bryan and Karginov labs for many helpful discussions. R.S.S. was supported by an NIH F31 Predoctoral Award (CA192822). This work was supported in part by a Merit Review Award (1I01BX002095) from the US Department of Veterans Affairs Biomedical Laboratory Research and Development Service and NIH awards (CA212608 and CA201717) to J.P.O. The contents of this article do not represent the views of the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs or the United States Government.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John P. O’Bryan.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Khan, I., Spencer-Smith, R. & O’Bryan, J.P. Targeting the α4–α5 dimerization interface of K-RAS inhibits tumor formation in vivo. Oncogene 38, 2984–2993 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41388-018-0636-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41388-018-0636-y

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links