Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Cisplatin-induced immune modulation in ovarian cancer mouse models with distinct inflammation profiles

Abstract

The backbone of ovarian cancer treatment is platinum-based chemotherapy and aggressive surgical debulking. New therapeutic approaches using immunotherapy via immune checkpoint blockade, which have demonstrated clinical efficacy in other tumor types, have been less promising in ovarian cancer. To increase their clinical efficacy, checkpoint inhibitors are now being tested in clinical trials in combination with chemotherapy. Here, we evaluated the impact of cisplatin on tumor immunogenicity and its in vivo roles when used alone or in combination with anti-PD-L1, in two novel murine ovarian cancer cell models. The 2F8 and its platinum-resistant derivative 2F8cis model, display distinct inflammatory profiles and chemotherapy sensitivities, and mirror the primary and recurrent human disease, respectively. Acute and chronic exposure to cisplatin enhances tumor immunogenicity by increasing calreticulin, MHC class I, antigen presentation and T-cell infiltration. Cisplatin also upregulates PD-L1 expression in vitro and in vivo, demonstrating a dual, paradoxical immune modulatory effect and supporting the rationale for combination with immune checkpoint blockade. One of the pathways activated by cisplatin treatment is the cGAS/STING pathway. Chronic cisplatin treatment led to upregulation of cGAS and STING proteins in 2F8cis compared to parental 2F8 cells, while acute exposure to cisplatin further increases cGAS and STING levels in both 2F8 and 2F8cis cells. Overexpression of cGAS/STING modifies tumor immunogenicity by upregulating PD-L1, MHC I and calreticulin in tumor cells. Anti-PD-L1 alone in a platinum-sensitive model or with cisplatin in a platinum-resistant model increases survival. These studies have high translational potential in ovarian cancer.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

The data sets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2017. CA Cancer J Clin. 2017;67:7–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Markman M, Bookman MA. Second-line treatment of ovarian cancer. Oncologist. 2000;5:26–35.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. NCI. SEER Cancer Facts: Ovarian Cancer 2007–2013. https://seer.cancer.gov/statfacts/html/ovary.html.

  4. Le DT, Durham JN, Smith KN, Wang H, Bartlett BR, Aulakh LK. et al. Mismatch-repair deficiency predicts response of solid tumors to PD-1 blockade. Science. 2017;357:409–13.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. McDermott DF, Drake CG, Sznol M, Choueiri TK, Powderly JD, Smith DC, et al. Survival, durable response, and long-term safety in patients with previously treated advanced renal cell carcinoma receiving nivolumab. J Clin Oncol. 2015;33:2013–20.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Reck M, Rodriguez-Abreu D, Robinson AG, Hui R, Csoszi T, Fulop A, et al. Pembrolizumab versus chemotherapy for PD-L1-positive non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med. 2016;375:1823–33.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Topalian SL, Sznol M, McDermott DF, Kluger HM, Carvajal RD, Sharfman WH, et al. Survival, durable tumor remission, and long-term safety in patients with advanced melanoma receiving nivolumab. J Clin Oncol. 2014;32:1020–30.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Gaillard SL, Secord AA, Monk B. The role of immune checkpoint inhibition in the treatment of ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol Res Pract. 2016;3:11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Topalian SL, Drake CG, Pardoll DM. Immune checkpoint blockade: a common denominator approach to cancer therapy. Cancer Cell. 2015;27:450–61.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Hamanishi J, Mandai M, Iwasaki M, Okazaki T, Tanaka Y, Yamaguchi K, et al. Programmed cell death 1 ligand 1 and tumor-infiltrating CD8 + T lymphocytes are prognostic factors of human ovarian cancer. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2007;104:3360–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Hamanishi J, Mandai M, Ikeda T, Minami M, Kawaguchi A, Murayama T, et al. Safety and Antitumor Activity of Anti-PD-1 Antibody, Nivolumab, in Patients With Platinum-Resistant Ovarian Cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2015;33:4015–22.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Varga AP-PS, Ott PA, Mehnert JM, Berton-Rigaud D, Morosky A. Pembrolizumab in patients (pts) with PD-L1–positive (PD-L1 + ) advanced ovarian cancer: Updated analysis of KEYNOTE-028. J Clin Oncol. 2017;35:5513.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Disis MLPM, Pant S, Hamilton EP, Lockhart AC, Kelly K. Avelumab (MSB0010718C; anti-PD-L1) in patients with recurrent/refractory ovarian cancer from the JAVELIN Solid Tumor phase Ib trial: Safety and clinical activity. J Clin Oncol. 2016;34:5533.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Hamanishi J, Mandai M, Konishi I. Immune checkpoint inhibition in ovarian cancer. Int Immunol. 2016;28:339–48.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Sharma P, Hu-Lieskovan S, Wargo JA, Ribas A. Primary, adaptive, and acquired resistance to cancer immunotherapy. Cell. 2017;168:707–23.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Dasari S, Tchounwou PB. Cisplatin in cancer therapy: molecular mechanisms of action. Eur J Pharmacol. 2014;740:364–78.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Beyranvand Nejad E, van der Sluis TC, van Duikeren S, Yagita H, Janssen GM, van Veelen PA, et al. Tumor eradication by cisplatin is sustained by CD80/86-mediated costimulation of CD8 + T cells. Cancer Res. 2016;76:6017–29.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Di Blasio S, Wortel IM, van Bladel DA, de Vries LE, Duiveman-de Boer T, Worah K, et al. Human CD1c( + ) DCs are critical cellular mediators of immune responses induced by immunogenic cell death. Oncoimmunology. 2016;5:e1192739.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Merritt RE, Mahtabifard A, Yamada RE, Crystal RG, Korst RJ. Cisplatin augments cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-mediated antitumor immunity in poorly immunogenic murine lung cancer. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2003;126:1609–17.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Mesnage SJL, Auguste A, Genestie C, Dunant A, Pain E, Drusch F, et al. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) increases immune infiltration and programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression in epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). Ann Oncol. 2017;28:651–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Bast RC Jr., Feeney M, Lazarus H, Nadler LM, Colvin RB, Knapp RC. Reactivity of a monoclonal antibody with human ovarian carcinoma. J Clin Invest. 1981;68:1331–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Havrilesky LJ, Elbendary A, Hurteau JA, Whitaker RS, Rodriguez GC, Berchuck A. Chemotherapy-induced apoptosis in epithelial ovarian cancers. Obstet Gynecol. 1995;85:1007–10.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Mony JT, Zhang L, Ma T, Grabosch S, Tirodkar TS, Brozick J, et al. Anti-PD-L1 prolongs survival and triggers T cell but not humoral anti-tumor immune responses in a human MUC1-expressing preclinical ovarian cancer model. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2015;64:1095–108.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Budiu RA, Elishaev E, Brozick J, Lee M, Edwards RP, Kalinski P, et al. Immunobiology of human mucin 1 in a preclinical ovarian tumor model. Oncogene. 2013;32:3664–75.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Dieu-Nosjean MC, Goc J, Giraldo NA, Sautes-Fridman C, Fridman WH. Tertiary lymphoid structures in cancer and beyond. Trends Immunol. 2014;35:571–80.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Taube JM, Klein A, Brahmer JR, Xu H, Pan X, Kim JH, et al. Association of PD-1, PD-1 ligands, and other features of the tumor immune microenvironment with response to anti-PD-1 therapy. Clin Cancer Res. 2014;20:5064–74.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Garcia-Diaz A, Shin DS, Moreno BH, Saco J, Escuin-Ordinas H, Rodriguez GA, et al. Interferon Receptor Signaling Pathways Regulating PD-L1 and PD-L2 Expression. Cell Rep. 2017;19:1189–201.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Parker BS, Rautela J, Hertzog PJ. Antitumour actions of interferons: implications for cancer therapy. Nat Rev Cancer. 2016;16:131–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Feng M, Chen JY, Weissman-Tsukamoto R, Volkmer JP, Ho PY, McKenna KM, et al. Macrophages eat cancer cells using their own calreticulin as a guide: roles of TLR and Btk. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2015;112:2145–50.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Yang H, Wang H, Ren J, Chen Q, Chen ZJ. cGAS is essential for cellular senescence. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2017;114:E4612–20.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Cortez MA, Ivan C, Valdecanas D, Wang X, Peltier HJ, Ye Y. et al. PDL1 Regulation by p53 via miR-34. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2016;108:djv303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Hughes PE, Caenepeel S, Wu LC. Targeted therapy and checkpoint immunotherapy combinations for the treatment of cancer. Trends Immunol. 2016;37:462–76.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Webb JR, Milne K, Kroeger DR, Nelson BH. PD-L1 expression is associated with tumor-infiltrating T cells and favorable prognosis in high-grade serous ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2016;141:293–302.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Demaria O, De Gassart A, Coso S, Gestermann N, Di Domizio J, Flatz L, et al. STING activation of tumor endothelial cells initiates spontaneous and therapeutic antitumor immunity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2015;112:15408–13.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Tang CH, Zundell JA, Ranatunga S, Lin C, Nefedova Y, Del Valle JR, et al. Agonist-mediated activation of STING induces apoptosis in malignant B cells. Cancer Res. 2016;76:2137–52.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Bakhoum SF, Ngo B, Laughney AM, Cavallo JA, Murphy CJ, Ly P, et al. Chromosomal instability drives metastasis through a cytosolic DNA response. Nature. 2018;553:467–72.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Lemos H, Mohamed E, Huang L, Ou R, Pacholczyk G, Arbab AS, et al. STING promotes the growth of tumors characterized by low antigenicity via IDO activation. Cancer Res. 2016;76:2076–81.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Liang D, Xiao-Feng H, Guan-Jun D, Er-Ling H, Sheng C, Ting-Ting W, et al. Activated STING enhances Tregs infiltration in the HPV-related carcinogenesis of tongue squamous cells via the c-jun/CCL22 signal. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2015;1852:2494–503.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Jiang RD, Zhang LX, Yue W, Zhu YF, Lu HJ, Liu X, et al. [Establishment of a human nasopharyngeal carcinoma drug-resistant cell line CNE2/DDP and screening of drug-resistant genes]. Ai Zheng. 2003;22:337–45.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Gao W, Rzewski A, Sun H, Robbins PD, Gambotto A. UpGene: Application of a web-based DNA codon optimization algorithm. Biotechnol Prog. 2004;20:443–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Feili-Hariri M, Falkner DH, Gambotto A, Papworth GD, Watkins SC, Robbins PD, et al. Dendritic cells transduced to express interleukin-4 prevent diabetes in nonobese diabetic mice with advanced insulitis. Hum Gene Ther. 2003;14:13–23.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Hardy S, Kitamura M, Harris-Stansil T, Dai Y, Phipps ML. Construction of adenovirus vectors through Cre-lox recombination. J Virol. 1997;71:1842–9.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Bilbao R, Reay DP, Hughes T, Biermann V, Volpers C, Goldberg L, et al. Fetal muscle gene transfer is not enhanced by an RGD capsid modification to high-capacity adenoviral vectors. Gene Ther. 2003;10:1821–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Grabosch S, Tseng G, Edwards RP, Lankes HA, Moore K, Odunsi K. et al. Multiplex profiling identifies distinct local and systemic alterations during intraperitoneal chemotherapy for ovarian cancer: An NRG Oncology/Gynecologic Oncology Group Study. Gynecol Oncol. 2017;146:137–45.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Oliveros JC. An interactive tool for comparing lists with Venn’s diagrams. 2007–2015. http://bioinfogp.cnb.csic.es/tools/venny/index.html.

  46. Kim D, Pertea G, Trapnell C, Pimentel H, Kelley R, Salzberg SL. TopHat2: accurate alignment of transcriptomes in the presence of insertions, deletions and gene fusions. Genome Biol. 2013;14:R36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Quinlan AR, Hall IM. BEDTools: a flexible suite of utilities for comparing genomic features. Bioinformatics. 2010;26:841–2.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Robinson MD, McCarthy DJ, Smyth GK. edgeR: a Bioconductor package for differential expression analysis of digital gene expression data. Bioinformatics. 2010;26:139–40.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Cibulskis K, Lawrence MS, Carter SL, Sivachenko A, Jaffe D, Sougnez C, et al. Sensitive detection of somatic point mutations in impure and heterogeneous cancer samples. Nat Biotechnol. 2013;31:213–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was partly supported by the NIH/NCI R01 CA163462, Pennsylvania Department of Health and a philanthropic donation from Mr. Matthew Fletcher Deitch.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anda M. Vlad.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Supplementary Information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Grabosch, S., Bulatovic, M., Zeng, F. et al. Cisplatin-induced immune modulation in ovarian cancer mouse models with distinct inflammation profiles. Oncogene 38, 2380–2393 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41388-018-0581-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41388-018-0581-9

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links