To the Editor:
Comprehensive study of immunoglobulin (IG) and T cell receptor (TR) gene rearrangements has proven instrumental for understanding immune responses in health and disease, while also offering information with direct clinical utility e.g., for minimal residual disease detection or clonality assessment in patients with lymphoid malignancies [1]. However, immunogenetic analysis entails descriptive definitions that are often arbitrary.
A particular challenge is posed by the term “clonotype”, generally referring to a unique antigen receptor gene rearrangement, for which different definitions have been proposed (Supplementary Table 1). The lack of a consistent definition of what a clonotype is can lead to different interpretations. This is especially true in Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) repertoire studies, where clustering of rearrangement sequences to clonotypes happens at the initial stages of data processing, thus affecting (meta)data interpretation. That said, it is crucial to reach a consensus on the stringent definition of a clonotype while highlighting cases where an alternative definition could be appropriate, depending on a given context or specific research hypothesis.
Since each antigen receptor corresponds to a given B/T cell, strictly speaking, the term “clonotype” should correspond to a unique V(D)J nucleotide sequence (Fig. 1). This definition becomes more complicated when moving from single cells to clones of cells. In the latter case, derivation from a single ancestral cell means that, in principle, all clonal cells should share the same clonotype. However, in reality, variations exist leading to (sub)clonal heterogeneity: by extension this raises the need for “context-specific” definitions. Relevant examples are outlined below.
Different B/T cell clones in the same or unrelated individuals may carry quasi-identical, “stereotyped” BcR IG or TR.
BcR IG stereotypy has been documented in normal B cells but also in the context of vaccination and infections [2] or mature B-cell malignancies [3, 4]. In the context of stereotyped BcR IG, clonotypes should be considered as clusters of sequences from independent B-cell clones that are grouped together based on V gene and CDR3 identity/similarity, which herein we propose to be defined as “meta-clonotypes” (Fig. 1). Although this approach considers different clonοtypes as one, thereby reducing the complexity of a given repertoire, it can be biologically and clinically relevant, e.g., for refining patient risk stratification [3, 4] (also see Supplementary Material).
Stereotyped TRs have been reported in different contexts, unsurprisingly on a shared HLA background [5], extending from infections to graft-versus-host-disease, anti-tumor responses or T-cell lymphoproliferations (e.g., T-LGL leukemia, etc) [6]. In some relevant examples, the common TR alpha or beta chain CDR3 shared by different T-cell clones/patients may be encoded degenerately by different nucleotide sequences (“convergent recombination”) [7], however, it would be amiss to not cluster these sequences in a single, “archetypical” clonotype (Supplementary Fig. 2).
Whilst stereotypy stands at one end of the spectrum of repertoire diversity, in B cells, the other end of the spectrum is represented by intraclonal diversification (ID) within the rearranged IG genes due to ongoing somatic hypermutation (SHM) [8] or due to aberrant (antigen-independent) introduction of SHM as present in some lymphomas [9]. When studying ID, the aim is to accurately map the complexity of the sub-clonal architecture: in such cases, only stringent criteria for defining a clonotype are appropriate. For instance, even when the V gene and the CDR3 nucleotide sequences are identical, yet the SHMs in the FR1-FR3 part of the V domain differ, the respective IGHV-IGHD-IGHJ rearrangement nucleotide sequences should be considered as distinct clonotypes’, thus proposing the term “sub-clonotypes”; (Figs. 1, 2) despite that they originate from the same unique founder cell.
ID may also occur in malignancies of immature lymphoid cells. A prime example is B-acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) where multiple new but related IG rearrangements may result from RAG-mediated recombination that may still be active in the malignant clone [10, 11]. In this context, the term clonotype can also be utilized for partial and/or unproductive rearrangements which may not encode for a functional antigen receptor chain yet constitute another unique molecular identity for a given B/T-cell clone.
The ever-increasing application of NGS in hemato(patho)logy poses a significant challenge regarding the interpretation of the findings concerning the size of the clonal cell population. For example, when assessing the clonality or MRD status based on BcR IG gene repertoire analysis by NGS, one has to take into account sequence divergence throughout the variable domain, including the VH CDR3 [12]. In this case, loosening the criteria for defining a clonotype helps to fully capture all the ‘branches’ of the same clonal population. To that purpose, one could compute clonotypes not as unique V(D)J nucleotide sequences but instead as clusters of sequences with the same V gene and VH CDR3s of identical length displaying high (minimum 80%) identity in the amino acid sequence.
Another important issue concerns unproductive or partial IG gene rearrangements and rearrangements involving the kappa deleting element (KDE) that lead to the inactivation of the respective IGK locus [13, 14]. These may not encode for a productive antigen receptor chain yet represent clonal signatures and should be reported as such.
Besides the biological heterogeneity, there are also technical aspects that need to be considered when defining clonotypes in a diagnostic setting, since they may falsely impact clonal size estimation. In detail:
-
TR gene rearrangements do not carry SHM. By logical extension, variations in the TR gene rearrangement sequence have to be attributed to PCR and/or sequencing errors: they can be ignored biologically but should still be included in the computation of the T-cell clone size (Supplementary Fig. 2).
-
Intraclonal variations can be observed in sequences sharing identical V, D and J genes and identical amino acid junctions, although with differences in the alignment of the NDN regions due to PCR or sequencing errors. In such cases, all relevant sequences should be considered as belonging to a single clonotype.
It is worth mentioning that when working with suboptimal starting material, such as DNA extracted from formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissues or liquid biopsies, smaller fragments may be obtained. More generally, small PCR amplicons may also arise if PCR amplification is performed using FR2 or FR3 primers. This issue may lead to misalignment of the IGHV/TRBV genes on the germline sequences, eventually causing generic assignments to different genes. Hence, clonotype computation and clonality assessment should be carefully handled, as both over- and under-estimation of the clonal size could occur.
The EuroClonality-NGS Working Group presents here the following definitions for the terms clonotype, meta-clonotype and sub-clonotype:
-
Clonotype: a unique V(D)J nucleotide sequence
-
Meta-clonotype: clusters of sequences from independent B/T-cell clones that are grouped together based on V gene and CDR3 identity/similarity (antigen receptor stereotypy and convergent recombination)
-
Sub-clonotype: rearrangement sequences using the same V gene and identical CDR3 nucleotide sequences, yet with SHMs that may differ in the FR1—FR3 part of the V domain.
Our aim is to promote accurate interpretation of immunogenetic cues in both diagnostics and research through the adoption of a common glossary that will enable fully harnessing the available information.
References
Agathangelidis A, Vlachonikola E, Davi F, Langerak AW, Chatzidimitriou A. High-throughput immunogenetics for precision medicine in cancer. Semin Cancer Biol. 2022;84:80–88.
Dunand CJH, Wilson PC. Restricted, canonical, stereotyped and convergent immunoglobulin responses. Philos Trans R Soc B: Biol Sci. 2015;370:20140238.
Stamatopoulos K, Agathangelidis A, Rosenquist R, Ghia P. Antigen receptor stereotypy in chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Leukemia. 2017;31:282–91.
Gemenetzi K, Agathangelidis A, Zaragoza-Infante L, Sofou E, Papaioannou M, Chatzidimitriou A, et al. B Cell Receptor Immunogenetics in B Cell Lymphomas: Immunoglobulin Genes as Key to Ontogeny and Clinical Decision Making. Front Oncol. 2020;10:67.
Quigley MF, Greenaway HY, Venturi V, Lindsay R, Quinn KM, Seder RA, et al. Convergent recombination shapes the clonotypic landscape of the naïve T-cell repertoire. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2010;107:19414–9.
Garrido P, Ruiz-Cabello F, Bárcena P, Sandberg Y, Cantón J, Lima M, et al. Monoclonal TCR-Vβ13.1+/CD4+/NKa+/CD8−/+dim T-LGL lymphocytosis: evidence for an antigen-driven chronic T-cell stimulation origin. Blood. 2007;109:4890–8.
Venturi V, Kedzierska K, Price DA, Doherty PC, Douek DC, Turner SJ, et al. Sharing of T cell receptors in antigen-specific responses is driven by convergent recombination. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2006;103:18691–6.
Bagnara D, Tang C, Brown JR, Kasar S, Fernandes S, Colombo M, et al. Post-transformation IGHV-IGHD-IGHJ mutations in chronic lymphocytic leukemia b cells: implications for mutational mechanisms and impact on clinical course. Front Oncol. 2021;11:1769.
Okazaki IM, Kotani A, Honjo T. Role of AID in tumorigenesis. Adv Immunol. 2007;94:245–73.
Choi Y, Greenberg S, Du T, Ward P, Overturf P, Brecher M, et al. Clonal evolution in B-lineage acute lymphoblastic leukemia by contemporaneous VH-VH gene replacements and VH-DJH gene rearrangements. Blood. 1996;87:2506–12.
Steenbergen EJ, Verhagen OJHM, van den Berg H, van Leeuwen EF, Behrendt H, Slater RR, et al. Rearrangement status of the malignant cell determines type of secondary IgH rearrangement (V-replacement or V to DJ joining) in childhood B precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Leukemia. 1997;11:1258–65.
Sofou E, Zaragoza-Infante L, Pechlivanis N, Karakatsoulis G, Notopoulou S, Stavroyianni N, et al. Evidence of somatic hypermutation in the antigen binding sites of patients with CLL harboring IGHV genes with 100% germline identity. Front Oncol. 2022;12:1079772. https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.1079772.
Dunda O, Corcos D. Recombining sequence recombination in normal kappa-chain-expressing B cells. J Immunol. 1997;159:4362–6.
Darzentas F, Szczepanowski M, Kotrová M, Kelm M, Hartmann A, Beder T, et al. IGH rearrangement evolution in adult KMT2A-rearranged B-cell precursor ALL: implications for cell-of-origin and MRD monitoring. Hemasphere. 2023;7:e820.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported in part by: the Horizon 2020 RIA NEoteRIC under Grant Agreement No. 871330; TRANSCAN-2 grant NOVEL; and 3) the Dutch Cancer Society under project grant 225 8313.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version. ES, EV, and LZI wrote the manuscript. MB, ND, PJTAG, MH, EAM, FP, edited the text and gave final approval. FD, AWL and KS wrote the manuscript, edited the text, and gave final approval.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Sofou, E., Vlachonikola, E., Zaragoza-Infante, L. et al. Clonotype definitions for immunogenetic studies: proposals from the EuroClonality NGS Working Group. Leukemia 37, 1750–1752 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41375-023-01952-7
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41375-023-01952-7