Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Correspondence
  • Published:

Epidemiology and Population Health

Critical evaluation of “Credibility of ChatGPT in the assessment of obesity in type 2 diabetes according to the guidelines”

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

References

  1. Barlas T, Altinova AE, Akturk M, Toruner FB. Credibility of ChatGPT in the assessment of obesity in type 2 diabetes according to the guidelines. Int J Obes (Lond). 2024;48:271–5. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41366-023-01410-5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Levitt HM, Surace FI, Wu MB, Chapin B, Hargrove JG, Herbitter C, et al. The meaning of scientific objectivity and subjectivity: From the perspective of methodologists. Psychol Methods. 2022;27:589.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Rice S, Crouse SR, Winter SR, Rice C. The advantages and limitations of using ChatGPT to enhance technological research. Technol Soc. 2024;76:102426.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Lai VD, Ngo NT, Veyseh APB, Man H, Dernoncourt F, Bui T, et al. Chatgpt beyond English: Towards a comprehensive evaluation of large language models in multilingual learning. arXiv preprint arXiv. 2023;1:1–21.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

SA conceptualized and designed the study, drafted the initial manuscript, and critically reviewed and revised the manuscript. All authors approved the final manuscript as submitted and agreed to be accountable for all aspects of the work.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sedat Arslan.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The author declares no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Arslan, S. Critical evaluation of “Credibility of ChatGPT in the assessment of obesity in type 2 diabetes according to the guidelines”. Int J Obes (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41366-024-01503-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41366-024-01503-9

Search

Quick links