Main

In the last three decades, advances in perinatal medicine have led to a substantial increase in survival rate for preterm infants (1). As neurodevelopmental morbidity did not decrease in a corresponding order (2), the focus has shifted toward prevention and early detection of brain injury. One approach is through continuous monitoring of brain activity using amplitude-integrated electroencephalography (aEEG). In term infants with perinatal hypoxic–ischemic encephalopathy, aEEG background pattern characteristics and changes in cycling activity provide prognostic information on neurodevelopmental outcome (3). Recent studies demonstrated that early aEEG pattern can predict both short- and long-term outcome in the preterm (4,5). Normal aEEG background pattern in preterm infants (6) differs, however, from that in the term infants (7), and interpretation of its tracing is problematic because it is strongly influenced by brain maturation (6,7). With increasing gestational age (GA) and postnatal age (PNA), immature aEEG pattern and low-voltage activity decrease (6,8). Additionally, medications, such as sedatives (9), frequently used in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) also influence aEEG activity, which makes aEEG interpretation in sick and immature infants particularly difficult. As aEEG is being increasingly used for clinical surveillance in many NICUs, clinicians face the challenges of interpreting preterm aEEG. However, it still remains to be elucidated how and under which conditions aEEG tracing evolves during the very early life period in this often critically ill patient population (10). Thus, our study investigates the evolution of aEEG tracing during the first 4 d of life in preterm infants with GA <32 wk without any brain injury on cranial ultrasound scan (cUS) and without any relevant hemodynamic disturbance. aEEG was measured repeatedly every 3 h. The influence of GA and PNA on the course of aEEG activity is analyzed, adjusting for several, potentially confounding perinatal factors. We hypothesize that early aEEG tracing activity increases during the first few days of life and that its interpretation is affected by perinatal non-neurological factors.

Results

Study Subjects

During the study period, of the 301 eligible newborns at the first day of life, 148 were prospectively monitored with aEEG and among them 96 were enrolled. Of the remaining 153 nonmonitored infants, 117 eligible infants could not be enrolled because of the limited capacity to simultaneously monitor brain activity of more than two infants in our division ( Figure 1 ). The aEEG tracings of 96 newborns with a mean (range) GA of 29.5 (24.4–31.9) wk and a mean birth weight of 1,260 (580–2,120) g were evaluated. The recordings started at a mean (range) age of 13.0 (1–21) h postpartum and were continuously performed until a mean (range) age of 90.0 (72–96) h after birth. Infants who received antenatal corticosteroids, mechanical ventilation, and morphine, caffeine, or indomethacin had significantly lower GA compared with those who did not (Mann–Whitney Test, all P < 0.001). No infant suffered from seizures. The perinatal baseline characteristics of the study infants listed in Table 1 did not differ from that of the eligible infants but from that of the nonmonitored infants (χ2 and Mann–Whitney test, all P > 0.1).

Figure 1
figure 1

Diagram flow of the study participants. Germinal matrix-intraventricular hemorrhage (GM-IVH) graded according to ref. 30: low-grade GM-IVH, grade I and II GM-IVH; high-grade GM-IVH, grade III GM-IVH and parenchymal hemorrhagic infarction. Periventricular leukomalacia (PVL) graded according to ref. 31: low-grade PVL, non-cystic PVL, grade I; cystic PVL, grades II, III, and IV. aEEG, amplitude-integrated electroencephalogram.

PowerPoint slide

Table 1 Perinatal variables of the study subjects

Interrater Agreement

Cohen’s κ (95% confidence interval) for interrater agreement was 0.79 (0.75–0.82) for the “maturity total score” and 0.60 (0.52–0.66) for the “cycling subscore,” respectively.

Univariate Effects of GA and PNA on aEEG Tracing

In the univariate analysis of the mixed model ( Table 2 ), GA was positively and significantly associated with all aEEG measures. PNA was also positively, but even stronger associated with all aEEG measures. Figure 2 shows an example of an aEEG development of a study subject from day 1 to day 3 of life with the corresponding aEEG measures. The slope for the PNA was 6.4 (total maturity score) to 11.3 times (maximum aEEG amplitude) steeper than for the GA. Figure 3a , b , c illustrates these effects for the total maturity score and the maximum and minimum aEEG amplitude.

Table 2 Univariate effect of perinatal factors on aEEG measures
Figure 2
figure 2

Amplitude-integrated electroencephalogram (aEEG) maturation in a study subject (gestational age: 30.0 wk) at (a) day 1 and (b) day 3 of life with the corresponding aEEG measures. (a) Day 1 (7−10 h after birth): maturity total score 1; cycling subscore 0; mean maximal aEEG amplitude 26.8 μV; and mean minimal aEEG amplitude 3.2 μV. (b) Day 3 (67−70 h after birth): maturity total score 8; cycling subscore 2; mean maximal aEEG amplitude 23.8 μV; and mean minimal aEEG amplitude 5.6 μV.

PowerPoint slide

Figure 3
figure 3

Effects on amplitude-integrated electroencephalogram (aEEG) tracing of gestational age (GA) and postnatal age (PNA) for (a) the “maturity total score,” (b) the maximum, and (c) minimum aEEG amplitude measurements. The continuous gray line represents the expected aEEG at birth for a reference infant in function of her GA (expressed here in weeks), estimated from our linear mixed model. The black segments of line represent the expected aEEG during the first 4 days (i.e., the first half of a week) of life, estimated from our linear mixed model. These segments are different for each GA because the expected aEEG at birth depends on GA (shown here are segments at 25, 27, 29, and 31 wk of GA). The slope of the GA is thus equal to the estimated GA effect, and the slope of the black segments is thus equal to the estimated PNA effect. The fact that the latter are steeper than the former illustrates the fact that the estimated PNA effect is higher than the estimated GA effect. Range of the four aEEG measures: total maturity score 0–12; cycling subscore: 0–4; maximum aEEG amplitude 4.5–36.0 μV; and minimum aEEG amplitude 1.6–8.5 μV. The results are corrected for sex, small for GA status, chorioamnionitis, antenatal steroids, 5-min Apgar, SNAPPE > 9. decile, administration of morphine, caffeine, and indomethacin, mechanical ventilation, and surfactant. SNAPPE-II, score for neonatal acute physiology perinatal extension-II.

PowerPoint slide

Univariate Effects of Perinatal Factors on aEEG Tracing

Univariate regression analyses of the linear mixed model revealed ( Table 2 ) that (i) infants born SGA displayed significant higher maximum aEEG amplitude than those born appropriate for GA; (ii) chorioamnionitis and administration of antenatal steroids were associated with a decrease in maximum aEEG amplitude; and (iii) and the administration of morphine, caffeine, indomethacin, surfactant, and mechanical ventilation were associated with less-mature aEEG measures. aEEG parameters were not associated with the sex of the subjects or any of the following measures of peri- and postnatal adaptation (arterial cord pH, 5-min Apgar score, score for neonatal acute physiology perinatal extension-II (SNAPPE-II), early sepsis, and hypoglycemia).

Multivariate Effects of GA, PNA, and Perinatal Factors on aEEG

Multivariate regression analysis of the linear mixed model revealed ( Table 3 ) that (i) GA (but the maximum aEEG amplitude) and PNA were still significantly associated with an increase in all aEEG measures; (ii) small-for-GA status was associated with increased maximum aEEG amplitude; and (iii) the administration of morphine and caffeine (but the “cycling subscore”) was associated with a decrease in the qualitative aEEG measures ( Figure 3 ).

Table 3 Multivariate effect of perinatal factors on aEEG measures

Discussion

This study describes changes of continuous aEEG tracings during the first 4 days of life in very preterm infants without cerebral injury on cUS. A significant increase in the aEEG activity during this early period of life was observed. Our findings are consistent with previous studies showing that qualitative (maturity scores) and quantitative (amplitudes) aEEG characteristics increase with advancing GA and PNA (8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15). According to our results, it seems that in very preterm infants, PNA is a more powerful drive for the development of aEEG measures than GA during this early period after birth, as observed previously by others over similar recording periods (13) and in serial recordings over longer observational periods (8) than in our study. The new analysis approach, the adjustment for several perinatal factors, and the large cohort size relative to the majority of studies on the same topic represent the strength of our study.

The observed increase of the electrocortical activity in preterm newborns immediately after birth may be the result of different processes. It may reflect an initial suppression following perinatal depression and consequent recover within 4 d ( Figure 2 ). The lack of any association between arterial cord pH, Apgar or severity illness scores, and the aEEG measures in our cohort does not support this hypothesis. Alternatively, the steeper developmental slope for PNA than for GA of the aEEG measures may be explained by an adaptation of the immature brain to postnatal stress factors such as sensorial stimuli and NICU interventions. NICU interventions are effectively performed more frequently during the first few days after birth, when these infants were monitored than at a later age. However, as we did not prospectively record and quantify these stimuli (pain, noise, light etc.) in our study, we cannot prove that this hypothesis holds true. There is evidence that the exposure to standard recorded stressors in the NICU is associated with regional alteration in brain structure when measured by magnetic resonance imaging (16). Other studies showed that preterm birth itself can alter functional brain maturation resulting in neurophysiological dysmaturity, with NICU interventions being a potential causative factor (17,18). Literature on neurosensory brain activity in preterm infants in relation to extrauterine life is inconsistent. The maturation of somatosensory pathways in preterm infants seems to be not altered in preterms without neurological deficit (19). The rapid decrease in latencies of the auditory (20) or visual (21) pathways, however, appears to be related to extrauterine factors rather than GA. EEG sleep studies, focusing on brain organization and maturation, reported both delayed and accelerated development of the cortical activity in healthy preterm infants (17), as well as the capacity of the immature brain to react differently to environment interventions (22).

This study shows that aside from GA and PNA, the administration of morphine and caffeine independently influenced the aEEG tracing, i.e., led to a less-mature background pattern and lower amplitude. Despite performing a multivariate analysis, controlling for GA and neonatal medical complications, it may be argued that newborns receiving these medications were more immature and sick, and thus, the underlying condition may have a greater impact on aEEG tracings than the interventions themselves.

We observed a suppressive effect of continuous morphine therapy on aEEG measures. This has not been reported in term cardiac infants (23), but it has already been demonstrated for preterms after morphine bolus application (24). According to multivariate analyses, the suppressive effect of morphine was only seen for the qualitative aEEG but not for the quantitative measures.

In our study, caffeine was associated with less-mature aEEG measures. This is in contrast with the findings of a study in which aEEG amplitudes and periods of continuity increased significantly in the immediate 2 h after caffeine administration (25). However, it remains unclear whether the effect on aEEG arises from the apneas and the underlying cerebral immaturity or from the caffeine administration. As we did not record the frequency of apneas in our sample, we are not able to draw a final conclusion.

The higher maximum aEEG amplitude observed in small-for-GA compared with appropriate-for-GA preterms could reflect a less-synchronous EEG activity pattern and possibly a less-mature ability to adapt to the extrauterine environment. EEG dysmature or disorganized pattern of activity has been already observed by others in intrauterine growth retarded preterms (26).

Our observation of an association between chorioamnionitis and lower maximum and minimum aEEG amplitudes in the univariate analysis is in agreement with the observation that high levels of tumor necrosis factor-α in preterms are associated with EEG depression (27). Similarly, recent data from animal studies suggest that subclinical exposure of preterm sheep to low-dose endotoxin can impair EEG maturation during the first 10 d of life, associated with neural inflammation (28).

The main limitation of this work is the rather small sample for the number of cofactors analyzed in a multivariate analysis. As only two aEEG devices were available in our unit, it was impossible to enroll the majority of newborns in our NICU. Recruitment bias, however, seems to be rather improbable considering the similar perinatal baseline characteristics of recruited vs. nonrecruited newborns. Furthermore, aEEG raters were blinded to the GA but not to the PNA of the subjects as they scored full aEEG tracings. This fact might have biased the visual assessment of the aEEG, potentially overestimating the postnatal increase of the scores. On the other hand, as our accuracy of GA estimate is not precise to 1 d, the estimation of the true GA effect on aEEG measures could have been attenuated. Finally, our interrater agreement for the visual aEEG assessment was of moderate degree, which may have decreased the power of the analysis of the course of the aEEG tracings over time. No bias should have implied the analysis of the difference between groups, however, as the same rater was used for both groups.

In conclusion, this study shows that in very preterm newborns, aEEG activity undergoes a significant maturational acceleration during the first few days of life. PNA and GA have the strongest influence on the development of the aEEG tracing; however, also non-neurologic clinical conditions and the administration of medications such as morphine and caffeine may relevantly alter the aEEG tracing and confound its interpretation. Knowledge on the impact of potential aEEG signal confounders is needed in order to improve the interpretation of aEEG tracings and thereby establish this neuromonitoring tool also for preterm born infants.

Methods

The institutional ethics boards of the University Children’s Hospital Zurich and of the Canton of Zurich approved the study protocol. Written informed consent was obtained from the parents or primary caretakers.

Subjects

In this prospective study, inborn infants with GA <32 wk admitted to the NICU of the neonatology division of the Zurich University Hospital between January 2009 and December 2011 were eligible. Exclusion criteria included chromosomal or congenital anomalies; any abnormality observed on cUS at any time after birth until discharge from the neonatology division; inborn errors of metabolism; or arterial hypotension (29), necessitating therapy with inotropes or vasopressors during aEEG monitoring. An abnormality on cUS was defined as any grade of germinal matrix-intraventricular hemorrhage according to Volpe (30), any grade of periventricular leukomalacia according to de Vries et al. (31), and ventriculomegaly according to Levene et al. (32). The NICU neonatologists performed the cUS, the findings were regularly reviewed within the board (including cUS specialists), and if disagreement was present, the rating was discussed and agreed upon. GA was assigned according to the best obstetrical estimate based on the last menstrual cycle and prenatal ultrasound scans, performed at the end of the first trimester. cUS was obtained on the first, third, and seventh day of life and repeated weekly until discharge. aEEG sequences of infants sedated with drugs other than morphine or treated with antiepileptics were excluded from the analysis.

Data Acquisition and Analysis Procedure

One-channel aEEG was recorded with biparietal hydrogel electrodes, corresponding to P3-P4, according to the international electroencephalogram classification 10–20 system, ground FZ, with the Brainz Instruments BRM3 monitor (Natus Medical, San Carlos, CA). The technique and the physiological background of the aEEG have been outlined in detail elsewhere (33). aEEG recording started within the first 24 h after birth and lasted until days 3–4. Each 3-h artifact-free period with impedance of less than 10 kOhm was analyzed. aEEG tracings were rated offline using two different rating methods based on preestablished criteria of visual and mechanical analysis (10,11). aEEG rating was performed by two authors (G.N. and C.H.) blinded toward the subject’s identity and clinical course. Results were compared, and if disagreement was present, the rating was discussed and agreed upon. Interrater agreement was expressed with the Cohen’s κ (see above). Analysis of the aEEG was performed as described in the following sections.

“Maturity total score” and “cycling subscore.” Visual analysis of each 3-h period was performed using the scoring system for brain maturity evaluation as described by Burdjalov et al. (11). Four components were graded (for details please see reference): continuity, cycling, amplitude of the lower border, and bandwidth of the aEEG amplitude. Each component was scored and summed to define a “maturity total score,” ranging from 0 to 13 with lower scores signifying less-mature brain activity. Because of its apparent role as indicator of brain maturity (11) and its prognostic relevance (4,5,7), the “cycling” component, ranging from 0 to 5, was separately analyzed and called “cycling subscore” (11,34).

Mechanical quantitative analysis. Mechanical quantitative analysis of the aEEG tracings was performed using the BrainZ Analyse Research software (Chart analyzer 1.71, The Liggins Institute, Auckland, New Zealand), which exports the raw data and calculates the 1-min average values for the maximum and minimum amplitudes of each 3-h aEEG trace period (10). The maximum and minimum aEEG amplitude corresponds to the upper and lower border of the aEEG envelope, respectively. We measured the mean amplitudes values for each aEEG period instead of measuring it during the quiet and active sleep period separately, because sleep phases are difficult to define in preterm infants.

Statistics

We assessed the effect of GA, PNA, and other perinatal factors on the various aEEG measurements using regression coefficients in a linear mixed model, calculated with the lme routine from the nlme package available in the free statistical (software R, version 2.5.1 (The R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria). We performed both univariate analyses, where a single factor was introduced in the model, and a multivariate analysis, with all factors in the model. Covariates included in the analyses were GA, PNA, and perinatal factors suspected to influence aEEG/EEG activity or neurologic outcome according to evidences from the literature (3,7,9,25,27,34,35,36), including male sex, small-for-GA status (birth weight <10 centile), chorioamnionitis (defined by histopathologic examination of the placenta), complete antenatal corticosteroids for lung maturation (37), arterial umbilical cord pH, 5-min Apgar score, the highest decile for GA of the SNAPPE-II (38). Furthermore, perinatal factors (recorded during aEEG monitoring) included mechanical ventilation, surfactant therapy, proven sepsis (positive blood or cerebrospinal fluid culture) (39), hypoglycemia (blood glucose level <2.5 mmol/l), and administration of morphine for sedation, caffeine for apnea therapy, and indomethacin for therapy of hemodynamically relevant patent ductus arteriosus (for dose and therapy duration please see Table 1 ). To account for repeated aEEG measures, a random “infant effect” was introduced in each model. Whereas the coefficient associated with PNA (the PNA effect) refers to the postnatal development of aEEG, being an estimation of the average daily development during the first 4 d of life, the coefficient associated with GA (the GA effect) refers to the prenatal development, being an estimation of the average difference of aEEG at birth between two groups of infants differing of 1 d with respect to GA. This 1-d difference is a statistical estimate, and it does not equal a true 1-d difference in GA, as the accuracy of GA estimation is not precise.

P values <0.05 were considered significant and 95% confidence intervals are provided for each coefficient.

Statement of Financial Support

G.N. was funded by the Swiss National Science Foundation, grant 33CM30-124101.

Disclosure

All authors declare no actual or potential conflict of interest.