Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • News & Views
  • Published:

Glomerular disease

Perspectives on maintenance therapy in lupus nephritis

Maintenance immunosuppressive drug therapy is necessary to counter the propensity of lupus nephritis to relapse. Claims that mycophenolate mofetil might be the magic bullet for both induction and maintenance therapies merit critical reappraisal due to inconsistent evidence of the superiority of mycophenolate mofetil over azathioprine, as well as its inordinately greater cost.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Hypothetical life-cycle of a new drug.

References

  1. Austin, H. A. 3rd et al. Therapy of lupus nephritis: controlled trial of prednisone and cytotoxic drugs. N. Engl. J. Med. 314, 614–619 (1986).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ginzler, E. M. et al. Mycophenolate mofetil or intravenous cyclophosphamide for lupus nephritis. N. Engl. J. Med. 353, 2219–2228 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Donadio, J. V. Jr et al. Treatment of diffuse proliferative lupus nephritis with prednisone and combined prednisone and cyclophosphamide. N. Engl. J. Med. 299, 1151–1155 (1978).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Boumpas, D. T. et al. Controlled trial of pulse methylprednisolone versus two regimens of pulse cyclophosphamide in severe lupus nephritis. Lancet 340, 741–745 (1992).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Contreras, G. et al. Sequential therapies for proliferative lupus nephritis. N. Engl. J. Med. 350, 971–980 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Dooley, M. A. et al. Mycophenolate versus azathioprine as maintenance therapy for lupus nephritis. N. Engl. J. Med. 365, 1886–1895 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Stoenoiu, M. S. et al. Repeat kidney biopsies fail to detect differences between azathioprine and mycophenolate mofetil maintenance therapy for lupus nephritis: data from the MAINTAIN nephritis trial. Nephrol. Dial. Transplant. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ndt/gfr553.

  8. Remuzzi, G. et al. Mycophenolate mofetil versus azathioprine for prevention of chronic allograft dysfunction in renal transplantation: the MYSS follow-up randomized, controlled clinical trial. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 18, 1973–1985 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Pham, P. T. & Pham, P. C. The impact of mycophenolate mofetil versus azathioprine as adjunctive therapy to cyclosporine on the rates of renal allograft loss due to glomerular disease recurrence. Nephrol. Dial. Transplant. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ndt/gfr731.

  10. Hiemstra, T. F. et al. Mycophenolate mofetil vs azathioprine for remission maintenance in antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated vasculitis. JAMA 304, 2381–2388 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The author declares no competing financial interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Balow, J. Perspectives on maintenance therapy in lupus nephritis. Nat Rev Nephrol 8, 136–138 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1038/nrneph.2012.17

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nrneph.2012.17

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing