In my recent Opinion article (Sensory theories of developmental dyslexia: three challenges for research. Nature Rev. Neurosci. 16, 43–54 (2015))1, I described the challenges in establishing causality for each of the main sensory-deficit theories of developmental dyslexia. In their comment (Visual attention deficits in developmental dyslexia cannot be ascribed solely to poor reading experience. Nature Rev. Neurosci. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrn3836-c1 (2015))2, Lobier and Valdois bring together 12 of their studies to argue that a visual attention (VA) span deficit meets the criteria that are required to demonstrate causality in developmental dyslexia3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14. Unfortunately, all of the studies that were discussed used letters to assess VA span; thus, the demonstrated deficit only affects letters and is causally ambiguous1. Lobier and Valdois do not address my key point — that a VA span deficit disappears if non-alphanumeric stimuli are used15,16 (Fig. 1). Furthermore, Lobier and Valdois rely on studies with adults and chronological age controls. Such research designs are ambiguous with respect to causality1, as the individuals with dyslexia and control individuals that were studied differed dramatically in their experience of recoding letters to sound.
Here, I focus on the reading level (RL) match and training data presented by Lobier and Valdois (see Table 1 in my Opinion article1), and a chronological-age match study using unfamiliar visual stimuli. Lobier and Valdois report an RL match study with 10-year-old children with dyslexia and 7-year-old typically developing children7. The VA span deficit (in letter report) was significant, but the younger children were markedly poorer at identifying single letters, which were the stimuli used in the VA span task. Consequently, this difference in identification accuracy could have caused the VA span difference7. Furthermore, the individuals with VA span dyslexia showed markedly worse pseudoword reading than those with 'phonological' dyslexia, indicating that they have very severely reduced experience in phonological recoding. This reduced practice in phonological recoding could explain the reduced VA span1. Lobier and Valdois also cite an RL match study that compared 11-year-old children with dyslexia (RL = 7 years) to 8-year-old typically developing children8. Unfortunately, the VA span task again used letters, but letter identification skills were not measured. Hence, the group difference in VA span could again arise from poorer letter identification skills in younger children.
In addition, Lobier and Valdois cite a training study that followed one 8-year-old child for 17 months9. The child received VA span training in months 3–6 and gained 4 months in reading age. Unfortunately, no control children who received a different type of training were tested, so the gain is impossible to interpret. Indeed, this child was not impaired in VA span when compared with RL match controls. Finally, a visual categorization study involving 10-year-old children was discussed11. Children were shown unfamiliar visual stimuli (Fig. 2), with strings of five stimuli from two categories displayed on any one trial. Children had to decide whether one, two or three stimuli were present from one of the two categories, which was visually cued before and after each trial. This task and stimuli are very similar to those used in a series of studies of visual processing in dyslexia by Vellutino17. Vellutino comprehensively established that, with unfamiliar visual stimuli, recognition and retention is affected by verbal labelling. Hence, a labelling (that is, phonological) difficulty could explain poorer categorization in individuals with dyslexia. Note that this was not a standard VA span study and that an RL match comparison was not included.
Clearly, the evidence presented does not critically touch on the challenges for sensory theories of dyslexia that are posed in my Opinion article1. Currently missing are studies measuring VA span before reading tuition commences, using both alphanumeric and non-alphanumeric stimuli, showing a reduced span in at-risk children. Studies of illiterate adults could also be informative, as no VA span difference should be found for letters versus symbols15. When verbal labels are overlearned, as for coloured dots, the VA span of individuals with dyslexia is equivalent to chronological age controls (Fig. 1). This fatally undermines the argument that the VA span deficit is a visually driven and independent cause of dyslexia11.
References
Goswami, U. Sensory theories of developmental dyslexia: three challenges for research. Nature Rev. Neurosci. 16, 43–54 (2015).
Lobier, M. & Valdois, S. Visual attention deficits in developmental dyslexia cannot be ascribed solely to poor reading experience. Nature Rev. Neurosci. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrn3836-c1 (2015).
Bosse, M.-L., Tainturier, M. J. & Valdois, S. Developmental dyslexia: the visual attention span deficit hypothesis. Cognition 104, 198–230 (2007).
Germano, G. D., Reilhac, C., Capellini, S. A. & Valdois, S. The phonological and visual basis of developmental dyslexia in Brazilian Portuguese reading children. Front. Psychol. 5, 1169 (2014).
Valdois, S. et al. Phonological and visual processing deficits can dissociate in developmental dyslexia: evidence from two case studies. Read. Writ. 16, 541–572 (2003).
Peyrin, C. et al. Neural dissociation of phonological and visual attention span disorders in developmental dyslexia: FMRI evidence from two case reports. Brain Lang. 120, 381–394 (2012).
Zoubrinetzky, R., Bielle, F. & Valdois, S. New insights on developmental dyslexia subtypes: heterogeneity of mixed reading profiles. PloS ONE 9, e99337 (2014).
Bosse, M. L. & Valdois, S. Patterns of developmental dyslexia according to a multi-trace memory model of reading. Curr. Psychol. Lett. 1, 10 (2003).
Valdois, S. et al. Dyslexia in a French–Spanish bilingual girl: behavioural and neural modulations following a specific visual-attention span intervention program. Cortex 53, 120–145 (2014).
Lallier, M., Valdois, S., Lassus-Sangosse, D., Prado, C. & Kandel, S. Impact of orthographic transparency on typical and atypical reading development: evidence in French–Spanish bilingual children. Res. Dev. Disabil. 35, 1177–1190 (2014).
Lobier, M., Zoubrinetzky, R. & Valdois, S. The visual attention span deficit in dyslexia is visual and not verbal. Cortex 48, 768–773 (2012).
Lobier, M., Peyrin, C., Pichat, C., Le Bas, J. F. & Valdois, S. Visual processing of multiple elements in the dyslexic brain: evidence for a superior parietal dysfunction. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 8, 479 (2014).
Ans, B., Carbonnel, S. & Valdois, S. A connectionist multiple-trace memory model for polysyllabic word reading. Psychol. Rev. 105, 678–723 (1998).
Lobier, M., Dubois, M. & Valdois, S. The role of visual processing speed in reading speed development. PLoS ONE 8, e58097 (2013).
Ziegler, J. C. et al. Rapid processing of letters, digits and symbols: what purely visual-attentional deficit in developmental dyslexia? Dev. Sci. 13, F8–F14 (2010).
Valdois, S., Lassus-Sangosse, D. & Lobier, M. Impaired letter string processing in developmental dyslexia: what visual-to-phonology code disorder? Dyslexia 18, 77–93 (2012).
Vellutino, F. R. Dyslexia: Theory and Research (MIT Press,1979).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
U.G. has funding to investigate the possible auditory sensory basis of developmental dyslexia in English.
PowerPoint slides
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Goswami, U. Visual attention span deficits and assessing causality in developmental dyslexia. Nat Rev Neurosci 16, 225–226 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn3836-c2
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn3836-c2
This article is cited by
-
Enhancing reading accuracy through visual search training using symbols
Scientific Reports (2023)
-
Reduced perceptual processing speed and atypical attentional weight at the cores of visual simultaneous processing deficits in Chinese children with developmental dyslexia: a parameter-based assessment of visual attention
Current Psychology (2023)
-
Improving sentence reading performance in Chinese children with developmental dyslexia by training based on visual attention span
Scientific Reports (2019)
-
Implicit learning deficits among adults with developmental dyslexia
Annals of Dyslexia (2016)
-
Translating dyslexia across species
Annals of Dyslexia (2016)