Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Comment
  • Published:

Primetime for e-health in IBD?

The treatment of IBD is currently suboptimal. Continuous monitoring of patients with IBD, patient engagement and early treatment adjustments are still difficult hurdles. E-Health could be an efficient tool to improve these aspects, but the current evidence for its use in IBD is poor. An integrated cost-effective e-health system supported by a stable legal framework is eagerly needed.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Relevant articles

Open Access articles citing this article.

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1

References

  1. Pew Research Center. Three technology revolutions. PewInternet http://www.pewinternet.org/three-technology-revolutions/ (2017).

  2. FDA. FDA permits marketing of first system of mobile medical apps for continuous glucose monitoring. FDA http://www.fda.gov/newsevents/newsroom/pressannouncements/ucm431385.htm (2015).

  3. Madara, J. L. Digital dystopia. American Medical Association https://www.ama-assn.org/sites/default/files/media-browser/public/meeting/Madera-speech-annual-2016.pdf (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Jackson, B. D. et al. Ehealth technologies in inflammatory bowel disease: a systematic review. J. Crohns Colitis 10, 1103–1121 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Mistry, H., Garnvwa, H. & Oppong, R. Critical appraisal of published systematic reviews assessing the cost-effectiveness of telemedicine studies. Telemed. J. E. Health 20, 609–618 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Han, J. H. et al. Professional practice and innovation: chronic disease, geographic location and socioeconomic disadvantage as obstacles to equitable access to e-health. HIM J. 39, 30–36 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peter Bossuyt.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

P.B. is part of the advisory board for Dr Falk Benelux, Hospira, Janssens-Cilag, MSD, Mundipharma, Pfizer, Roche and Takeda, has received lecture fees from Abbvie, Takeda and Vifor Pharma, and has received an educational grant from Abbvie. L.P.-B. has received consulting fees from Abbvie, Amgen, Biogaran, BMS, Boerhinger-Ingelheim, Celgene, Celltrion, Ferring, Forward Pharma, Genentech, HAC-Pharma, Hospira, Index Pharmaceuticals, Janssen, Lilly, Merck, Mitsubishi, Norgine, Pfizer, Pharmacosmos, Pilège, Sandoz, Takeda, Therakos, Tillots, UCB-pharma and Vifor; received lecture fees from Merck, Abbvie, Takeda, Janssen, Takeda, Ferring, Norgine, Tillots, Vifor, Therakos, Mitsubishi, HAC-pharma. L.P. declares no competing interests.

PowerPoint slides

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bossuyt, P., Pouillon, L. & Peyrin-Biroulet, L. Primetime for e-health in IBD?. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 14, 133–134 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/nrgastro.2017.11

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nrgastro.2017.11

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing