Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • News & Views
  • Published:

Pediatrics

Measuring pediatric BMD—the bar raised but the glass half full

Extensive reference data sets of pediatric bone density measurements are now available, together with equations to translate BMD into relevant Z-scores and correct for abnormal stature. So now is the right time to ask: are you thinking about bone density in children correctly?

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

References

  1. Zemel, B. S. et al. Revised reference curves for bone mineral content and areal bone mineral density according to age and sex for black and non-black children: results of the Bone Mineral Density in Childhood Study. J. Clin. Endocrin. Metab. 96, 3160–3169 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Gafni, R. I. & Baron, J. Overdiagnosis of osteoporosis in children due to misinterpretation of dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA). J. Pediatr. 144, 253–257 (2004).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Leonard, M. B., Propert, K. J., Zemel, B. S., Stallings, V. A & Feldman, H. I. Discrepancies in pediatric bone mineral density reference data: Potential for misdiagnosis of osteopenia. J. Pediatr. 135, 182–188 (1999).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Gordon, C. M. et al. Dual energy X-ray absorptiometry interpretation and reporting in children and adolescents: the 2007 ISCD Pediatric Official Positions. J. Clin. Densitom. 11, 43–58 (2008).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Breukhoven, P. E., Leunissen, R. W, de Kort, S. W., Willemsen, R. H. & Hokken-Koelega, A. C. Preterm birth does not affect bone mineral density in young adults. Eur. J. Endocrinol. 164, 133–138 (2011).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Kanis, J. A. et al. Interpretation and use of FRAX in clinical practice. Osteoporos. Int. 22, 2395–2411 (2011).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Bachrach, L. K., Sills, I. N & Section on Endocrinology. Clinical report—bone densitometry in children and adolescents. Pediatrics 127, 189–194 (2011).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Lewiecki, E. M., Baim, S., Langman, C. B. & Bilezikian, J. P. The official positions of the International Society for Clinical Densitometry: perceptions and commentary. J. Clin. Densitom. 12, 267–271 (2009).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Leonard, M. B. et al. Effects of sex, race, and puberty on cortical bone and the functional muscle bone unit in children, adolescents, and young adults. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 95, 1681–1689 (2010).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The author declares no competing financial interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Langman, C. Measuring pediatric BMD—the bar raised but the glass half full. Nat Rev Endocrinol 8, 8–9 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1038/nrendo.2011.205

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nrendo.2011.205

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing